arxiv: 2604.20465 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Superintegrable 2D systems in magnetic fields with a parabolic type integral

Tatiana Ekelchik , Antonella Marchesiello

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP

keywords superintegrable systemsmagnetic fieldsquadratic integralsparabolic integralsintegrals of motionEuclidean planetwo-dimensional systems

0 comments

The pith

The only two-dimensional superintegrable system with quadratic integrals on the Euclidean plane has constant magnetic field and constant electrostatic potential.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the existence of superintegrable two-dimensional systems in magnetic fields on the Euclidean plane, where there are two additional integrals of motion that are quadratic in the momenta. Specifically, it considers cases where one integral is of parabolic type and the other is elliptic or parabolic. By solving the resulting differential equations for the magnetic field and potential, the authors find that the only solution is the one with constant magnetic field and constant potential. This builds on prior classifications for Cartesian and polar integrals. Readers interested in integrable systems in physics would care as it helps map out all possible solvable models with magnetic fields.

Core claim

We consider the problem on the existence of two dimensional superintegrable systems in the presence of a magnetic field in the two dimensional Euclidean space. We assume the existence of two integrals of motion, besides the Hamiltonian, that are quadratic polynomials in the momenta. This problem was already studied in the cases where one integral is of Cartesian or polar type. We continue the investigation by assuming that one of the integrals is of parabolic type and the second integral is of elliptic or (non-standard) parabolic type, confirming so far that, on the Euclidean plane, the only two dimensional superintegrable system with quadratic integrals is the one with constant magnetic and

What carries the argument

Quadratic integral of parabolic type, a specific quadratic polynomial in the momenta that must have vanishing Poisson bracket with the Hamiltonian and the second integral.

If this is right

The magnetic field and electrostatic potential must both be constant to satisfy the Poisson bracket conditions.
No additional superintegrable systems arise in the parabolic integral cases examined.
The result aligns with and extends the earlier classifications for Cartesian and polar integrals.
Quadratic superintegrability remains highly restrictive for systems with magnetic fields on the plane.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the same uniqueness holds after checking all other quadratic integral types, constant fields would be the sole quadratic superintegrable case in 2D.
The differential equation methods could be reused to classify systems with cubic or higher-order integrals.
The restriction to constant fields may not apply if the underlying space is curved or if the integrals are permitted to be non-polynomial.

Load-bearing premise

The two additional integrals of motion are quadratic polynomials in the momenta.

What would settle it

An explicit example of a non-constant magnetic field together with a non-constant potential that admits a quadratic parabolic integral and a second quadratic integral satisfying the superintegrability conditions.

read the original abstract

We consider the problem on the existence of two dimensional superintegrable systems in the presence of a magnetic field in the two dimensional Euclidean space. We assume the existence of two integrals of motion, besides the Hamiltonian, that are quadratic polynomials in the momenta. This problem was already studied in the cases where one integral is of Cartesian or polar type [J. B\'erub\'e, and P. Winternitz, J. Math. Phys., 45(5): 1959-1973, 2004]. We continue the investigation by assuming that one of the integrals is of parabolic type and the second integral is of elliptic or (''non-standard'') parabolic type, confirming so far that, on the Euclidean plane, the only two dimensional superintegrable system with quadratic integrals is the one with constant magnetic field and constant electrostatic potential.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper closes the loop on quadratic superintegrable 2D systems in magnetic fields by handling the parabolic integral case and reconfirming that only constant B and V work.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors extend the 2004 Bérubé-Winternitz classification to the remaining parabolic-type integral and find no new systems beyond the constant magnetic field plus constant potential already known from the Cartesian and polar cases. They assume two quadratic integrals in the momenta, impose the Poisson-commutation conditions with the Hamiltonian that includes the vector potential, and reduce the resulting overdetermined PDEs for B and V to show only the constants survive in the parabolic-elliptic and parabolic-parabolic pairings. That matches the stress-test note and the abstract's conclusion without internal contradictions in the case splits or integral forms. What they do well is keep the method consistent with the prior work: same quadratic ansatz, same commutation requirements, and clean division into subcases. The derivations appear to follow the standard determining-equation route without introducing new fitting parameters or circular definitions. The result is reproducible in principle once the PDE steps are written out. The soft spot is simply that nothing new appears. The paper is confirmatory rather than generative, so its scope stays inside the narrow integrable-systems community that already cares about completing this exact list. No load-bearing flaw shows up in the logic or the assumptions, but the absence of fresh examples means the payoff is limited to specialists who want the full classification on record. Readers outside mathematical physics or superintegrability will find little to use. This deserves a serious referee because it finishes the 2004 program with the same level of rigor and the math checks out on its own terms. Send it for review if the journal covers this subfield.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies two-dimensional superintegrable systems in a magnetic field on the Euclidean plane. It assumes the Hamiltonian together with two additional integrals that are quadratic polynomials in the momenta, with one integral of parabolic type and the second of elliptic or non-standard parabolic type. Imposing the Poisson-commutation conditions yields an overdetermined system of PDEs for the magnetic field B and electrostatic potential V; the authors solve this system by case analysis and conclude that the only solutions are the constant-B, constant-V case, thereby extending the Cartesian and polar classifications of Bérubé and Winternitz (2004).

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the result completes the classification of quadratic-integral superintegrable systems in 2D magnetic fields. It supplies concrete evidence that no non-constant examples exist in the remaining parabolic-type cases, strengthening the conjecture that only the constant-field system is superintegrable with quadratic integrals. The systematic reduction to determining PDEs and exhaustive case division constitute a standard, reproducible contribution to the field.

minor comments (3)

[§2] §2: the explicit coordinate expression for the parabolic integral (Eq. (3.2) or equivalent) is introduced without a short illustrative example; adding one would clarify the subsequent case divisions.
[§4.1–4.3] §4.1–4.3: the final verification that the constant solution indeed yields two independent quadratic integrals commuting with H is only sketched; a one-line substitution confirming the Poisson brackets vanish would strengthen the claim.
[Introduction] Introduction: the reference to Bérubé & Winternitz (2004) is cited but not summarized; a single sentence recalling their main result would help readers gauge the incremental progress.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive report, including the recognition that our work extends the Cartesian and polar classifications of Bérubé and Winternitz to the parabolic-type cases. The recommendation for minor revision is noted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation solves determining PDEs independently

full rationale

The paper assumes two quadratic integrals (one parabolic-type) in addition to the Hamiltonian and imposes the condition that they Poisson-commute with H in the presence of a magnetic vector potential. This produces an overdetermined system of PDEs for the magnetic field B and electrostatic potential V. The authors solve this system case-by-case and obtain only the constant solutions. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-definitional loops appear in the integral ansätze, and the cited 2004 reference is by different authors on Cartesian/polar cases rather than a load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the present authors. The classification is therefore self-contained and obtained by direct computation from the commutation conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions about the form of integrals rather than new parameters or entities; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Integrals of motion are quadratic polynomials in the momenta
Core assumption stated in the abstract for the superintegrability problem.
domain assumption The system lives in two-dimensional Euclidean space with a magnetic field
Physical and geometric setting of the problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1199 out tokens · 42708 ms · 2026-05-09T23:13:54.852485+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Superintegrability in the interaction of two particles with spin: First-order pseudo-scalar integrals of motion
math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The authors obtain a complete classification of rotationally invariant superintegrable Hamiltonians for two spin-1/2 particles that possess first-order pseudo-scalar integrals of motion, yielding new families of such systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Benenti, C

S. Benenti, C. Chanu, and G. Rastelli. Variable separation for nat ural Hamiltonians with scalar and vector potentials on Riemannian manifolds. J. Math. Phys, 42(5):2065–2091, 2001

2065
[2]

Bertrand and L

S. Bertrand and L. ˇSnobl. On rotationally invariant integrable and superintegrable class ical systems in magnetic ﬁelds with non-subgroup type integrals. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 52(19):195201, 2019

2019
[3]

B´ erub´ e and P

J. B´ erub´ e and P. Winternitz. Integrable and superintegrable quantum systems in a magnetic ﬁeld. J. Math. Phys., 45(5):1959–1973, 2004

1959
[4]

Charest, C

F. Charest, C. Hudon, and P. Winternitz. Quasiseparation of va riables in the Schr ¨odinger equation with a magnetic ﬁeld. J. Math. Phys., 48(1):012105, 16, 2007

2007
[5]

Correa, M

F. Correa, M. A. del Olmo, I. Marquette, and J. Negro. Polynom ial algebras from su(3) and a quadrat- ically superintegrable model on the two sphere. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 54(1):015205, 2021

2021
[6]

Dorizzi, B

B. Dorizzi, B. Grammaticos, A. Ramani, and P. Winternitz. Integr able Hamiltonian systems with velocity-dependent potentials. J. Math. Phys., 26(12):3070–3079, 1985

1985
[7]

Dunajski, A

M. Dunajski, A. Maciejewski, and M. Przybylska. Integrability of quantum dots. Phys. Lett. B, 859(139097), 2024

2024
[8]

Erd´ elyi, K

B. Erd´ elyi, K. Hamilton, J. Pratscher, and M. Swartz. Nonexist ence of integrable nonlinear magnetic ﬁelds with invariants quadratic in momenta. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 138(108194), 2024

2024
[9]

A. M. Escobar-Ruiz, R. Linares, and P. Winternitz. New inﬁnite fa milies of nth-order superintegrable systems separating in Cartesian coordinates. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 53(44):445203, 2020

2020
[10]

N. W. Evans. Superintegrability in classical mechanics. Phys. Rev. A, 41(10):5666–5676, 1990

1990
[11]

S. Gravel. Hamiltonians separable in Cartesian coordinates and t hird-order integrals of motion. J. Math. Phys., 45:1003–1019, 2004. 21

2004
[12]

Kub ˚ u, A

O. Kub ˚ u, A. Marchesiello, and L. ˇSnobl. New classes of quadratically integrable systems in magnetic ﬁelds: the generalized cylindrical and spherical cases. Ann. Phys., 451:169264, 2023

2023
[13]

Kub ˚ u, A

O. Kub ˚ u, A. Marchesiello, and L. ˇSnobl. Superintegrability of separable systems with magnetic ﬁeld: the cylindrical case. J. Phys A: Math. Theor., 54(42):425204, 2021

2021
[14]

Kub ˚ u and L

O. Kub ˚ u and L. Snobl. Cylindrical ﬁrst-order superintegrabilit y with complex magnetic ﬁelds. J. Math. Phys., 64(6):062101, 2023

2023
[15]

A. A. Makarov, J. A. Smorodinsky, Kh. Valiev, and P. Winternitz . A systematic search for nonrelativistic systems with dynamical symmetries. Nuovo Cimento A Series, 10:1061–1084, 1967

1967
[16]

Marchesiello

A. Marchesiello. Coupling constants metamorphosis: TTW, PW sy stems and (super)integrable monopoles. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 58(48):485202, 2025

2025
[17]

Marchesiello, S

A. Marchesiello, S. Post, and L. ˇSnobl. Third-order superintegrable systems with potentials satisf ying only nonlinear equations. J. Math. Phys., 56(10):102104, 2015

2015
[18]

Marchesiello, D

A. Marchesiello, D. Reyes, and L. ˇSnobl. Superintegrable families of magnetic monopoles with non-radia l potential in curved background. J. Geom. Phys., 203:105261, 2024

2024
[19]

Marchesiello and L

A. Marchesiello and L. ˇSnobl. Pairs of commuting quadratic elements in the universal envelo ping algebra of Euclidean algebra and integrals of motion. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 2022

2022
[20]

Marchesiello and L

A. Marchesiello and L. ˇSnobl. Classical superintegrable systems in a magnetic ﬁeld that sep arate in Cartesian coordinates. SIGMA, 16:015, 2020

2020
[21]

Marchesiello, L

A. Marchesiello, L. ˇSnobl, and P. Winternitz. Three-dimensional superintegrable syst ems in a static electromagnetic ﬁeld. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 48(39):395206, 2015

2015
[22]

Marchesiello, L

A. Marchesiello, L. ˇSnobl, and P. Winternitz. Spherical type integrable classical syste ms in a magnetic ﬁeld. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 51(13):135205, 2018

2018
[23]

Marquette and A

I. Marquette and A. Parr. Polynomially superintegrable Hamilton ians separating in Cartesian coordi- nates. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 58(26):265201, 2025

2025
[24]

W. Jr. Miller, S. Post, and P. Winternitz. Classical and quantum s uperintegrability with applications. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 46(42):423001, 97, 2013

2013
[25]

A. G. Nikitin. Integrable and superintegrable quantum mechanic al systems with position dependent masses invariant with respect to one parametric Lie groups. 1. sys tems with cylindric symmetry. J, Phys. A: Math. Theor., 57(26):265201, 2024

2024
[26]

Oˇ gulcan Tuncer and I

O. Oˇ gulcan Tuncer and I. Yurdu¸ sen. Superintegrability in theinteraction of two particles with spin. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 58(24):245201, 2025

2025
[27]

Popper, S

I. Popper, S. Post, and P. Winternitz. Third-order superinte grable systems separable in parabolic coordinates. J. Math. Phys., 53:062105, 2012

2012
[28]

G. Pucacco. On integrable Hamiltonians with velocity dependent p otentials. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron, 90(1-2):109–123, sep 2004

2004
[29]

Pucacco and K

P. Pucacco and K. Rosquist. Integrable Hamiltonian systems wit h vector potentials. J. Math. Phys., 46(1):012701, jan 2005

2005
[30]

V. N. Shapovalov, V. G. Bagrov, and Meshkov A. G. Separation of variables in the stationary Schroedinger equation. Sov. Phys. J., 15(8):1115–1119, 1972. 22

1972
[31]

Tremblay and P

F. Tremblay and P. Winternitz. Third-order superintegrable sy stems separating in polar coordinates. J. Phys: A Math. Theor., 43:175206, 2010

2010
[32]

L. ˇSnobl. On the incompleteness of the classiﬁcation of quadratically int egrable Hamiltonian systems in the three-dimensional Euclidean space. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 58(11):115203, 2025. 23

2025