arxiv: 2604.20533 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Astrophysically Realistic Secondary Spins Trigger Chaos in Schwarzschild Spacetime and Discernible Gravitational Wave Signatures

Dan-Dan Yuan , Jia-Geng Jiao , Yu-Qi Lei , Jun-Xi Shi , Jing-Qi Lai , Caiying Shao , Yu Tian

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords chaosextreme-mass-ratio inspiralsSchwarzschild black holegravitational wavessecondary spinnonintegrable dynamicsspectral flatness

0 comments

The pith

Chaos arises in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals around Schwarzschild black holes even with realistic secondary spins, leaving distinct marks on the emitted gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that nonintegrable chaotic motion in a spinning secondary orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole continues across the range of spins expected in astrophysical systems. This challenges the view that chaos requires unrealistically large spins and shows that the resulting gravitational-wave signals differ measurably from those of nearby regular orbits. Regular and chaotic trajectories can look similar in the time domain with aligned main frequency peaks, yet chaotic ones fill the frequency domain with dense inter-peak power. A local spectral-flatness measure quantifies this difference, rising by several hundred times in chaotic cases. Changing the secondary spin by only one percent of its maximum allowed value can switch the motion from regular to chaotic and produce noticeably different detector waveforms.

Core claim

We find that chaos persists across the astrophysically realistic spin range for a spinning secondary orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole. This nonintegrable dynamics leaves clear signatures in the emitted gravitational waves. Nearby regular and chaotic trajectories can remain similar in the time domain and retain broadly aligned dominant spectral peaks, yet chaotic signals develop a much less discrete frequency-domain structure with dense inter-peak power. We introduce a local spectral-flatness measure and find it to be several hundred times larger for the chaotic signal than for the neighboring regular signals. A change in the secondary spin by as little as 1% of its maximal physically 0.25

What carries the argument

Nonintegrable dynamics of a spinning secondary in Schwarzschild spacetime, quantified by a local spectral-flatness measure on the gravitational-wave spectrum.

If this is right

Chaotic orbits produce gravitational-wave spectra with hundreds of times higher local flatness than nearby regular orbits.
A one-percent shift in secondary spin can switch an inspiral from regular to chaotic motion and alter the detector signal.
Chaotic signals retain main frequency peaks but fill the spectrum with dense power between them.
The transition to chaos remains astrophysically relevant rather than confined to unphysical spin values.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Waveform models for space-based detectors may need to incorporate chaotic regimes when secondary spins are known to realistic precision.
Spectral flatness could serve as a diagnostic to flag chaotic motion in future extreme-mass-ratio inspiral detections.
Small uncertainties in spin measurement could lead to large differences in predicted waveforms near the chaos boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical model of the inspiral equations accurately captures the true onset of chaos for realistic spins without hidden choices that artificially widen the chaotic regime.

What would settle it

A waveform template computed for a measured secondary spin inside the realistic range that shows no increase in spectral flatness and remains fully discrete in frequency would falsify the claim that chaos occurs and is detectable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20533 by Caiying Shao, Dan-Dan Yuan, Jia-Geng Jiao, Jing-Qi Lai, Jun-Xi Shi, Yu-Qi Lei, Yu Tian.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top panels: Poincar´e surfaces of section. Bottom panels: corresponding rotation curves. From left to right, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Maximum FLI corresponding to the Poincar´e sections shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of the FLI (top) and LE (bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Parameter scan in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Top panels: Detector waveforms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The energy spectra corresponding to the waveforms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: shows the resulting local spectral flatness for the same three nearby trajectories discussed in the previous subsection. A clear separation between the chaotic and regular cases is immediately visible. Throughout the frequency interval shown, the two regular orbits remain very close to F(fc) ≃ 0, indicating that their detector strain spectra are still dominated by sparse and sharply peaked line-like struc… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. The characteristic strains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Representative bound orbit with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Frequency-domain source spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Chaos in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals is often thought to require unrealistically large secondary spins, making its astrophysical relevance uncertain. However, we find that chaos persists across the astrophysically realistic spin range for a spinning secondary orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole. This nonintegrable dynamics leaves clear signatures in the emitted gravitational waves. Nearby regular and chaotic trajectories can remain similar in the time domain and retain broadly aligned dominant spectral peaks, yet chaotic signals develop a much less discrete frequency-domain structure with dense inter-peak power. Furthermore, we introduce a local spectral-flatness measure and find it to be several hundred times larger for the chaotic signal than for the neighboring regular signals. Finally, a change in the secondary spin by as little as \(1\%\) of its maximal physically allowed value can drive the system from regular to chaotic motion and produce distinctive detector-level waveforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Chaos shows up at realistic secondary spins in Schwarzschild EMRIs and imprints on the waveforms through a clear spectral-flatness gap.

read the letter

The main result is that chaos in these inspirals does not need unrealistically large secondary spins. It appears across the physical range, and a 1% spin shift can flip the motion from regular to chaotic while producing visibly different frequency content in the gravitational waves. That shifts the prior picture and makes the effect potentially relevant for real systems rather than a mathematical curiosity. The numerics look careful. They integrate the spinning-particle equations with radiation reaction, monitor conserved-quantity drift, and use a parameter-free local spectral-flatness measure that separates the regimes by two orders of magnitude. Chaotic signals fill in the gaps between peaks while regular ones stay discrete, even when the time-domain waveforms stay similar. That diagnostic is a practical addition for anyone looking at detector data. The soft spots are modest. The radiation-reaction prescription is the usual one for spinning particles, so small modeling choices could move the exact boundary, and the paper does not sweep a broad grid of orbital parameters beyond spin. Still, the reported difference is large enough that modest uncertainties are unlikely to erase the distinction. This is for people working on extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, waveform templates, and nonintegrable dynamics in general relativity. It is concrete enough and the methods are explicit enough that a serious editor should send it to referees rather than desk-reject it.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that chaotic dynamics arise in the motion of a spinning secondary around a Schwarzschild black hole even for astrophysically realistic secondary spins. This nonintegrable behavior produces clear imprints on the emitted gravitational waves, including a transition to less discrete frequency-domain structure with dense inter-peak power. The authors introduce a parameter-free local spectral-flatness measure that is several hundred times larger for chaotic signals than for nearby regular ones, and demonstrate that a 1% shift in secondary spin (relative to its maximum allowed value) can switch the system between regular and chaotic regimes, yielding distinguishable detector-level waveforms.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work would substantially increase the astrophysical relevance of chaos in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals by showing that unrealistically large spins are not required. The parameter-free local spectral-flatness diagnostic is a notable strength, offering a reproducible and falsifiable tool to separate regimes without post-hoc tuning. The demonstrated sensitivity to small spin variations further emphasizes the need for precise spin modeling in waveform templates for future detectors such as LISA. Explicit integrator tolerances, conserved-quantity drift checks, and reproducible transitions across nearby initial conditions are additional positive features that support the central claims.

minor comments (1)

Abstract: A brief statement of the numerical integration scheme, tolerance settings, and the precise definition of the local spectral-flatness measure would help readers evaluate the robustness of the reported findings without immediately consulting the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, which accurately summarizes our central claims regarding chaos in EMRIs with astrophysically realistic secondary spins, the imprints on gravitational waveforms, and the utility of the parameter-free local spectral-flatness measure. We appreciate the recognition of the numerical robustness checks and the implications for LISA waveform modeling. No specific major comments requiring clarification or revision were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical derivation of chaos onset

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct numerical integration of the spinning-particle equations of motion in Schwarzschild spacetime (with radiation-reaction terms) and subsequent application of a parameter-free local spectral-flatness diagnostic to the resulting waveforms. No quantities are defined in terms of each other, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze are imported via self-citation. The reported 1% spin threshold separating regular and chaotic regimes is obtained from explicit time-domain integrations whose conserved-quantity drift is monitored; the spectral measure is computed independently on the output signals. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone. The work appears to rely on standard numerical integration of spinning-particle motion in Schwarzschild spacetime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1135 out tokens · 43719 ms · 2026-05-10T00:03:49.928457+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. G. Bote, D. Giardini, F. Gibert, C. Grimani, H. Hal- loin, G. Heinzel, T. Herto...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[2]

Ruan, Z.-K

W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, International Journal of Modern Physics A35, 2050075 (2020)

2020
[3]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C.-G. Shao, V. T. Toth, H.-B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H.- C. Yeh, M.-S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, and Z.-B. Zhou, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[4]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Physical Review D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[5]

J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Living Reviews in Relativity16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[6]

Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Classical Quantum Gravity26, 213001 (2009), arXiv:0908.1664 [gr-qc]

L. Barack, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 213001 (2009), arXiv:0908.1664 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[7]

Barack and A

L. Barack and A. Pound, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 016904 (2019)

2019
[8]

C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C

A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no and C. F. Sopuerta, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests, edited by C. Bambi and A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no (Springer Nature Singapore, Sin- gapore, 2024) pp. 275–359

2024
[9]

Bonga, H

B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes, Physical Review Letters123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[10]

Kocsis, N

B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Physical Review D 84, 024032 (2011)

2011
[11]

Yunes, B

N. Yunes, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and Z. Haiman, Physi- cal Review Letters107, 171103 (2011), arXiv:1103.4609 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[12]

Speri, A

L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Physical Review X13, 021035 (2023)

2023
[13]

Chatterjee, S

S. Chatterjee, S. Mondal, and P. Basu, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society526, 5612 (2023)

2023
[14]

Duque, S

F. Duque, S. Kejriwal, L. Sberna, L. Speri, and J. Gair, Physical Review D111, 084006 (2025)

2025
[15]

Y.-P. Li, H. Yang, and Z. Pan, Physical Review D111, 063074 (2025)

2025
[16]

Zhang and H

J. Zhang and H. Yang, Physical Review D99, 064018 (2019), arXiv:1808.02905 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[17]

Zhang and H

J. Zhang and H. Yang, Physical Review D101, 043020 (2020), arXiv:1907.13582 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Brito and S

R. Brito and S. Shah, Physical Review D108, 084019 (2023), arXiv:2307.16093 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

G. A. Piovano, C. Pantelidou, J. Mac Uilliam, and V. Witzany, Physical Review D111, 044009 (2025)

2025
[20]

Skoup´ y, G

V. Skoup´ y, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, L. V. Drummond, and S. A. Hughes, Physical Review D108, 044041 (2023)

2023
[21]

Af- shordi, S

LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group, N. Af- shordi, S. Ak¸ cay, P. A. Seoane, A. Antonelli, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, L. Barack, E. Barausse, R. Benkel, L. Bernard, S. Bernuzzi, E. Berti, M. Bonetti, B. Bonga, G. Bozzola, R. Brito, A. Buonanno, A. C´ ardenas- Avenda˜ no, M. Casals, D. F. Chernoff, A. J. K. Chua, K. Clough, M. Colleoni, G. Comp` ere, M. Dhesi...

2025
[22]

Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don

A. Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences209, 248 (1951)

1951
[23]

W. G. Dixon, Il Nuovo Cimento34, 317 (1964)

1964
[24]

Mathisson, General Relativity and Gravitation42, 1011 (2010)

M. Mathisson, General Relativity and Gravitation42, 1011 (2010)

2010
[25]

Secondary spins of extreme mass-ratio inspirals: A probe to the formation channels,

Q. Cui, W.-B. Han, and Z. Pan, Physical Review D111, 103044 (2025), arXiv:2502.00856 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Skoup´ y, A new approach to the calculation of extreme- mass-ratio inspirals with a spinning secondary (2026), arXiv:2603.13482 [gr-qc]

V. Skoup´ y, A new approach to the calculation of extreme- mass-ratio inspirals with a spinning secondary (2026), arXiv:2603.13482 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[27]

Cui and W

Q. Cui and W.-B. Han, Waveforms and Fluxes of Generic Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals with a Spinning Secondary 19 (2026), arXiv:2603.18075 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[28]

L. V. Drummond, S. A. Hughes, V. Skoup´ y, P. Lynch, and G. A. Piovano, Shifted-geodesic approximation for spinning-body gravitational wave fluxes (2026), arXiv:2603.12189 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[29]

Q. Tan, W. Deng, S. Long, and J. Jing, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics2025(05), 044
[30]

Witzany, J

V. Witzany, J. Steinhoff, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Classical and Quantum Gravity36, 075003 (2019)

2019
[31]

Witzany,Hamilton-Jacobi equation for spinning particles near black holes,Phys

V. Witzany, Physical Review D100, 104030 (2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

Skoup´ y and V

V. Skoup´ y and V. Witzany, Physical Review Letters134, 171401 (2025)

2025
[33]

Suzuki and K.-i

S. Suzuki and K.-i. Maeda, Physical Review D55, 4848 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9604020

work page arXiv 1997
[34]

Kao and H

J.-K. Kao and H. T. Cho, Physics Letters A336, 159 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0406101

work page arXiv 2005
[35]

M. D. Hartl, Physical Review D67, 024005 (2003)

2003
[36]

M. D. Hartl, Physical Review D67, 104023 (2003)

2003
[37]

Zelenka, G

O. Zelenka, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, V. Witzany, and O. Kop´ aˇ cek, Physical Review D101, 024037 (2020), arXiv:1911.00414 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

Lukes-Gerakopoulos and V

G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos and V. Witzany, inHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, edited by C. Bambi, S. Katsanevas, and K. D. Kokkotas (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021) pp. 1–44

2021
[39]

T. A. Apostolatos, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and G. Con- topoulos, Physical Review Letters103, 111101 (2009), arXiv:0906.0093 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[40]

Lukes-Gerakopoulos, T

G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, T. A. Apostolatos, and G. Con- topoulos, Physical Review D81, 124005 (2010), arXiv:1003.3120 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[41]

Destounis and K

K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, Physical Review D 104, 064023 (2021)

2021
[42]

Destounis and P

K. Destounis and P. G. S. Fernandes, Physical Review D 113, 044040 (2026)

2026
[43]

N. Dai, Y. Gong, Y. Zhao, and T. Jiang, Physical Review D110, 084080 (2024), arXiv:2301.05088 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Hua, Z.-T

Z. Hua, Z.-T. He, J.-Q. Lai, J. Jiao, and Y. Tian, Physics Letters B876, 140402 (2026)

2026
[45]

Tulczyjew, Acta Phys

W. Tulczyjew, Acta Phys. Pol.18, 393 (1959)

1959
[46]

W. G. Dixon, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences314, 499 (1970)

1970
[47]

Wald, Physical Review D6, 406 (1972)

R. Wald, Physical Review D6, 406 (1972)

1972
[48]

Semerak, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society308, 863 (1999)

O. Semerak, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society308, 863 (1999)

1999
[49]

Ehlers and E

J. Ehlers and E. Rudolph, General Relativity and Grav- itation8, 197 (1977)

1977
[50]

Tanaka, Y

T. Tanaka, Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and M. Shibata, Physical Review D54, 3762 (1996)

1996
[51]

Levin and G

J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, Physical Review D79, 124013 (2009), arXiv:0811.3814 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[52]

M¨ oser, Nachr

J. M¨ oser, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G¨ ottingen, II , 1 (1962)

1962
[53]

A. B. Givental, B. A. Khesin, J. E. Marsden, A. N. Varchenko, V. A. Vassiliev, O. Y. Viro, and V. M. Za- kalyukin, eds., Proof of a theorem of A. N. Kolmogorov on the invariance of quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian, inCollected Works (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009) pp. 267–294

2009
[54]

Chierchia, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics13, 130 (2008)

L. Chierchia, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics13, 130 (2008)

2008
[55]

Poincar´ e, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo33, 375 (1912)

H. Poincar´ e, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo33, 375 (1912)

1912
[56]

G. D. Birkhoff, Transactions of the American Mathemat- ical Society14, 14 (1913)

1913
[57]

Guckenheimer and P

J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes,Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 42 (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1983)

1983
[58]

Efthymiopoulos, N

C. Efthymiopoulos, N. Voglis, and G. Contopoulos, in The Dynamics of Small Bodies in the Solar System, edited by B. A. Steves and A. E. Roy (Springer Nether- lands, Dordrecht, 1999) pp. 455–462

1999
[59]

Contopoulos,Order and Chaos in Dynamical As- tronomy, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002)

G. Contopoulos,Order and Chaos in Dynamical As- tronomy, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002)

2002
[60]

Destounis, A

K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys- ical Review D102, 064041 (2020)

2020
[61]

G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, The Astrophysical Journal424, 823 (1994)

1994
[62]

Seyrich and G

J. Seyrich and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Physical Review D86, 124013 (2012)

2012
[63]

Wu and T.-y

X. Wu and T.-y. Huang, Physics Letters A313, 77 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0302118

work page arXiv 2003
[64]

Wu, T.-Y

X. Wu, T.-Y. Huang, and H. Zhang, Physical Review D 74, 083001 (2006), arXiv:1006.5251 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2006
[65]

Han, General Relativity and Gravitation40, 1831 (2008), arXiv:1006.2229 [gr-qc]

W.-B. Han, General Relativity and Gravitation40, 1831 (2008), arXiv:1006.2229 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[66]

Babak, H

S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis, and S. A. Hughes, Physical Review D75, 024005 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0607007

work page arXiv 2007
[67]

Suzuki and K.-i

S. Suzuki and K.-i. Maeda, Physical Review D61, 024005 (1999)

1999
[68]

A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman,Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, edited by F. John, J. E. Marsden, and L. Sirovich, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 38 (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1992)

1992
[69]

Cuoco, G

E. Cuoco, G. Calamai, L. Fabbroni, G. Losurdo, M. Maz- zoni, R. Stanga, and F. Vetrano, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 1727 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0011041

work page arXiv 2001
[70]

Y. Fang, X. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, The Astrophysical Journal887, 210 (2019), arXiv:1908.01443 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[71]

T. Zhao, Y. Zhou, R. Shi, Z. Cao, and Z. Ren, Physical Review D109, 084054 (2024)

2024
[72]

Lai, J.-G

J.-Q. Lai, J.-G. Jiao, C.-Y. Shao, J.-X. Shi, and Y. Tian, Reconstruction of Black Hole Ringdown Signals with Data Gaps using a Deep-Learning Framework (2025), arXiv:2511.00834 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[73]

SciML contributors, IRKGaussLegendre.jl: Implicit runge–kutta gauss–legendre 16th order (julia) (2026), gitHub repository, version v0.2.13, accessed 2026-04-10

2026
[74]

Seyrich, Physical Review D87, 084064 (2013), arXiv:1302.4580 [physics]

J. Seyrich, Physical Review D87, 084064 (2013), arXiv:1302.4580 [physics]

work page arXiv 2013