pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20593 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Predicting co-segregation in multicomponent alloys with solute-solute interactions

Zuoyong Zhang , Chuang Deng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords co-segregationmulticomponent alloyssolute-solute interactionssegregation energymachine learningmagnesium alloysalloy design
0
0 comments X

The pith

An extended dual-solute segregation framework quantitatively predicts co-segregation in multicomponent alloys by accounting for solute-solute interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes an extended dual-solute segregation framework that incorporates both homoatomic and heteroatomic interactions to predict how multiple solutes co-segregate in alloys. A machine-learning model first generates pairwise segregation energies, which are used to create spectra that set the possible range of segregation for each solute. The framework is applied to magnesium alloys formed with pairs of eleven different solutes and matches outcomes from hybrid simulations and published experiments. A design strategy is proposed to enhance co-segregation by adding solutes that attract existing ones, even when sites compete. Such a tool would help engineers tailor alloy properties more efficiently through controlled impurity placement.

Core claim

The extended DS segregation framework quantitatively predicts co-segregation behavior with solute-solute interactions, including both homoatomic and heteroatomic contributions. A machine-learning workflow predicts the pairwise segregation energy to construct the DS segregation energy spectra that intrinsically include solute-solute interactions. The resulting spectral information determines the upper and lower bounds of segregation for individual solutes. When applied to magnesium-based multicomponent systems with any two of 11 candidate solutes, the framework is validated by hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results. A design strategy promotes co-segregation

What carries the argument

The extended dual-solute (DS) segregation framework, which constructs segregation energy spectra from machine-learned pairwise energies to account for homoatomic and heteroatomic solute interactions and set segregation bounds.

If this is right

  • Upper and lower bounds of segregation for each solute can be determined directly from the constructed energy spectra.
  • Co-segregation can be enhanced by selecting additional solutes that exhibit attractive interactions with existing ones.
  • The framework supplies a predictive route for designing and optimizing multicomponent alloys without exhaustive case-by-case computation.
  • Quantitative agreement holds for magnesium systems alloyed with pairs drawn from eleven candidate solutes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same machine-learning workflow on pairwise energies could be retrained for base metals other than magnesium to screen alloy compositions.
  • The approach offers a route to reduce full hybrid simulations when screening many candidate solute pairs for target segregation behavior.
  • The strategy of using attractive solute pairs to overcome site competition may apply to segregation control at surfaces or other defects.

Load-bearing premise

The machine-learning model trained on pairwise segregation energies accurately captures the full spectrum of homoatomic and heteroatomic interactions without significant extrapolation error when applied to new solute combinations.

What would settle it

Segregation levels measured in a new magnesium alloy with two solutes falling outside the predicted upper and lower bounds from the energy spectra would show the quantitative predictions are not reliable.

read the original abstract

The co-segregation of impurities in multicomponent alloys has been widely recognized as an effective strategy for tailoring material properties. However, quantitative predictions of co-segregation behavior remain a significant challenge for alloy design in systems containing multiple solute species. In this work, we develop an extended dual-solute (DS) segregation framework to quantitatively predict co-segregation behavior with solute-solute interactions, including both homoatomic and heteroatomic contributions. A machine-learning workflow is first established to predict the pairwise segregation energy to construct the DS segregation energy spectra that intrinsically include solute-solute interactions. The resulting spectral information is then utilized to determine the upper and lower bounds of segregation for individual solutes. When applied to magnesium-based multicomponent systems constructed by alloying Mg with any two of the 11 candidate solute species, the extended DS segregation framework is successfully validated by hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results available in existing literature. Furthermore, we introduce a design strategy to promote co-segregation by incorporating additional solute species that exhibit attractive interactions with existing solutes, thereby enabling enhanced segregation even in the presence of strong site competition. These results underscore the critical role of solute-solute interactions in governing co-segregation behavior and provide a predictive pathway for the design and optimization of multicomponent alloys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an extended dual-solute (DS) segregation framework to predict co-segregation in Mg-based multicomponent alloys by incorporating solute-solute interactions. A machine-learning model is trained to predict pairwise segregation energies (including homo- and heteroatomic terms) that are then used to construct DS energy spectra and derive quantitative upper/lower segregation bounds for any pair drawn from 11 candidate solutes. The framework is stated to be validated against hybrid MD/MC simulations and existing experimental literature, and a design rule is proposed for enhancing co-segregation via attractive solute additions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a practical, scalable route to quantitative co-segregation prediction that explicitly includes solute-solute interactions, which are often omitted in simpler models. The combination of ML-driven spectra, bound derivation, MD/MC validation, and a design strategy for promoting segregation constitutes a useful contribution to multicomponent alloy design. The stated validation against both simulation and experiment is a strength that, if documented with quantitative metrics, would increase the result's impact.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and Methods: the machine-learning workflow for predicting pairwise segregation energies supplies no training-set size, feature set, cross-validation protocol, or test-set error metrics (MAE, R², or extrapolation error on held-out solute pairs). Because the central claim requires that these energies produce quantitatively accurate segregation bounds for all 11-solute combinations, the absence of these diagnostics leaves open the possibility that predictions rest on interpolation or uncontrolled extrapolation whose magnitude is unknown.
  2. Results/Validation section: the manuscript asserts that the extended DS framework is 'successfully validated' by hybrid MD/MC simulations and literature experiments, yet no quantitative comparison (e.g., deviation in predicted vs. simulated segregation fractions, error bars on bounds, or statistical measures of agreement) is provided. Without such metrics it is impossible to judge whether the claimed quantitative agreement survives typical ML uncertainties of ~0.05 eV or larger.
minor comments (2)
  1. Introduction: explicitly cite the original DS segregation framework paper(s) so that the precise extensions (homo-/heteroatomic terms, ML spectra, bound derivation) are clear to readers.
  2. Figures: add uncertainty bands or ML-prediction error bars to all segregation-energy spectra and bound plots so that the reader can assess the robustness of the reported upper/lower limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The two major comments correctly identify omissions in the original submission. We have revised the manuscript to supply the requested details on the machine-learning workflow and to add quantitative validation metrics. These changes directly address the concerns while preserving the scope and conclusions of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and Methods: the machine-learning workflow for predicting pairwise segregation energies supplies no training-set size, feature set, cross-validation protocol, or test-set error metrics (MAE, R², or extrapolation error on held-out solute pairs). Because the central claim requires that these energies produce quantitatively accurate segregation bounds for all 11-solute combinations, the absence of these diagnostics leaves open the possibility that predictions rest on interpolation or uncontrolled extrapolation whose magnitude is unknown.

    Authors: We agree that these methodological details were insufficiently documented. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new subsection in Methods that specifies the training-set size (DFT-derived pairwise energies for Mg-based configurations), the feature vector (elemental properties, coordination, and electronic descriptors), the cross-validation protocol (5-fold), and the test-set performance (MAE, R², and extrapolation error on held-out solute pairs). The added text also discusses the domain of applicability for the 11-solute space, thereby removing the ambiguity about interpolation versus extrapolation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results/Validation section: the manuscript asserts that the extended DS framework is 'successfully validated' by hybrid MD/MC simulations and literature experiments, yet no quantitative comparison (e.g., deviation in predicted vs. simulated segregation fractions, error bars on bounds, or statistical measures of agreement) is provided. Without such metrics it is impossible to judge whether the claimed quantitative agreement survives typical ML uncertainties of ~0.05 eV or larger.

    Authors: We accept that the original validation section lacked explicit quantitative metrics. The revised manuscript now includes direct numerical comparisons: mean absolute deviations between DS-predicted and MD/MC segregation fractions, error bars on the upper/lower bounds derived from the energy spectra, and Pearson correlation coefficients between predicted and observed trends. These metrics are reported both for the simulation benchmarks and for the experimental literature data, allowing the reader to assess agreement relative to the ~0.05 eV ML uncertainty scale. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained with external validation.

full rationale

The paper establishes an ML workflow to predict pairwise segregation energies for constructing DS spectra that include solute-solute interactions, then derives upper/lower segregation bounds from those spectra and validates the overall framework against independent hybrid MD/MC simulations plus literature experiments on Mg-based systems. No step reduces by construction to its inputs: the ML predictions are presented as a forward model (not a fit-then-rename of the target co-segregation statistics), the bounds follow deterministically from the spectra without tautological redefinition, and the central quantitative claim rests on external benchmarks rather than self-citation or ansatz smuggling. The derivation therefore remains independent of the fitted values once the ML step is accepted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the assumption that pairwise segregation energies are sufficient to determine co-segregation bounds and that the ML model generalizes beyond its training set. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • ML model hyperparameters
    The machine-learning workflow for predicting pairwise segregation energies necessarily involves fitted hyperparameters whose values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Pairwise segregation energies fully capture the relevant solute-solute interactions for determining segregation bounds
    Invoked when the spectral information is used to set upper and lower bounds of segregation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5529 in / 1357 out tokens · 34326 ms · 2026-05-10T00:02:50.638598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Guttmann, Equilibrium segregation in a ternary solution: A model for temper em- brittlement, Surface Science 53 (1) (1975) 213–227.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0039-6028(75)90125-9

    M. Guttmann, Equilibrium segregation in a ternary solution: A model for temper em- brittlement, Surface Science 53 (1) (1975) 213–227.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0039-6028(75)90125-9

    1975

  2. [2]

    Guttmann, Ph

    M. Guttmann, Ph. Dumoulin, M. Wayman, The thermodynamics of interactive co- segregation of phosphorus and alloying elements in iron and temper-brittle steels, Met- allurgical Transactions A 13 (10) (1982) 1693–1711.doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02647825

    1982

  3. [3]

    W. Xing, A. R. Kalidindi, D. Amram, C. A. Schuh, Solute interaction effects on grain boundary segregation in ternary alloys, Acta Materialia 161 (2018) 285–294.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.005 2018

  4. [4]

    L. Wang, R. Darvishi Kamachali, CALPHAD integrated grain boundary co-segregation 25 design: Towards safe high-entropy alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 933 (2023) 167717.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167717

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167717 2023

  5. [5]

    M. P. Seah, E. D. Hondros, Grain boundary segregation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 335 (1601) (1973) 191–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1973.0121

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1973.0121 1973

  6. [6]

    R. A. Mulford, C. J. Mcmahon, D. P. Pope, H. C. Feng, Temper embrittlement of Ni-Cr Steels by phosphorus, Metallurgical Transactions A 7 (8) (1976) 1183–1195.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02656602

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02656602 1976

  7. [7]

    E. D. Hondros, M. P. Seah, Segregation to interfaces, International Metals Reviews 22 (1) (1977) 262–301.doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/imtr.1977.22.1.262

    work page doi:10.1179/imtr.1977.22.1.262 1977

  8. [8]

    S. J. Dillon, M. Tang, W. C. Carter, M. P. Harmer, Complexion: A new concept for kinetic engineering in materials science, Acta Materialia 55 (18) (2007) 6208–6218.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.029 2007

  9. [9]

    J. D. Schuler, T. J. Rupert, Materials selection rules for amorphous complexion for- mation in binary metallic alloys, Acta Materialia 140 (2017) 196–205.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.042 2017

  10. [10]

    P. R. Cantwell, T. Frolov, T. J. Rupert, A. R. Krause, C. J. Marvel, G. S. Rohrer, J. M. Rickman, M. P. Harmer, Grain Boundary Complexion Transitions, Annual Re- view of Materials Research 50 (1) (2020) 465–492.doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-matsci-081619-114055

    2020

  11. [11]

    C. M. Grigorian, T. J. Rupert, Thick amorphous complexion formation and extreme thermal stability in ternary nanocrystalline Cu-Zr-Hf alloys, Acta Materialia 179 (2019) 172–182.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.031 2019

  12. [12]

    T. Lei, J. Shin, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Bulk nanocrystalline Al alloys with hierarchi- cal reinforcement structures via grain boundary segregation and complexion formation, Acta Materialia 221 (2021) 117394.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021. 117394

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021 2021

  13. [13]

    E. C. Hessong, N. Li, S. Fensin, B. L. Boyce, T. J. Rupert, Thicker amorphous grain boundary complexions reduce plastic strain localization in nanocrystalline Cu-Zr (2026). doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18059 2026

  14. [14]

    C. M. Grigorian, T. J. Rupert, Critical cooling rates for amorphous-to-ordered com- plexion transitions in Cu-rich nanocrystalline alloys, Acta Materialia 206 (2021) 116650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116650

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116650 2021

  15. [15]

    E. C. Hessong, Z. Zhang, T. Lei, M. Xu, T. Aoki, T. J. Rupert, Modulation of struc- tural short-range order due to chemical patterning in multi-component amorphous in- terfacial complexions, Acta Materialia (2026) 122108doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actamat.2026.122108. 26

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    T. Lei, E. C. Hessong, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Binary nanocrystalline alloys with strong glass forming interfacial regions: Complexion stability, segregation competition, and diffusion pathways, Materials Characterization 206 (2023) 113415.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113415

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113415 2023

  17. [17]

    T. Lei, E. C. Hessong, B. Fields, R. P. Thiraux, D. S. Gianola, T. J. Rupert, Bulk nanocrystalline Al–Mg–Y alloys with amorphous grain boundary complexions display high strength and compressive plasticity, Journal of Materials Science 60 (39) (2025) 18486–18501.doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-11328-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-025-11328-0 2025

  18. [18]

    I. Basu, K. Pradeep, C. Mießen, L. Barrales-Mora, T. Al-Samman, The role of atomic scale segregation in designing highly ductile magnesium alloys, Acta Materialia 116 (2016) 77–94.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.024 2016

  19. [19]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Xie, J. Zhang, X.-S. Yang, R. Wu, Towards designing high mechanical per- formance low-alloyed wrought magnesium alloys via grain boundary segregation strat- egy: A review, Journal of Magnesium and Alloys (2024) S2213956724001208doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2024.03.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jma.2024.03.016 2024

  20. [20]

    L. Xiao, X. Chen, B. Gao, X. Dong, Z. Pan, H. Zhou, Current progress on solute seg- regation at interfaces in Mg alloys, Materials Research Letters (2026) 1–20doi:https: //doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2026.2619451

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2026.2619451 2026

  21. [21]

    X. Zhao, H. Chen, N. Wilson, Q. Liu, J.-F. Nie, Direct observation and impact of co-segregated atoms in magnesium having multiple alloying elements, Nature Commu- nications 10 (1) (2019) 3243.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10921-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10921-7 2019

  22. [22]

    J. F. Nie, Y. M. Zhu, J. Z. Liu, X. Y. Fang, Periodic Segregation of Solute Atoms in Fully Coherent Twin Boundaries, Science 340 (6135) (2013) 957–960.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1229369

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1229369 2013

  23. [23]

    X. Qian, Z. Dong, B. Jiang, B. Lei, H. Yang, C. He, L. Liu, C. Wang, M. Yuan, H. Yang, B. Yang, C. Zheng, F. Pan, Influence of alloying element segregation at grain boundary on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-Zn alloy, Materials & Design 224 (2022) 111322.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111322

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111322 2022

  24. [24]

    X. Qian, Z. Dong, Q. Luo, J. Li, Y. Luo, B. Lei, A. Zhang, B. Jiang, Improved tensile and forming properties by the enhanced strain coordination at grain boundary with alloying elements co-segregation in Mg-Zn-Ca alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1050 (2026) 185527.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.185527

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.185527 2026

  25. [25]

    Z. Zeng, Y. Zhu, S. Xu, M. Bian, C. Davies, N. Birbilis, J. Nie, Texture evolution during static recrystallization of cold-rolled magnesium alloys, Acta Materialia 105 (2016) 479– 494.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.045

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.045 2016

  26. [26]

    Z.-Y. Meng, C. Wang, Z.-M. Hua, M. Zha, H.-Y. Wang, Achieving extraordinary thermal stability of fine-grained structure in a dilute magnesium alloy, Materials Research Letters 10 (12) (2022) 797–804.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2022.2106797. 27

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2022.2106797 2022

  27. [27]

    R. Pei, Y. Zou, D. Wei, T. Al-Samman, Grain boundary co-segregation in magnesium alloys with multiple substitutional elements, Acta Materialia 208 (2021) 116749.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116749

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116749 2021

  28. [28]

    R. Pei, J. Petrazoller, A. Atila, S. Arnoldi, L. Xiao, X. Liu, H. Wang, S. Korte-Kerzel, S. Berbenni, T. Richeton, J. Gu´ enol´ e, Z. Xie, T. Al-Samman, Solute co-segregation mechanisms at low-angle grain boundaries in magnesium: A combined atomic-scale experimental and modeling study, Acta Materialia 306 (2026) 121947.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.actam...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2026.121947 2026

  29. [29]

    R. Pei, Y. Zou, M. Zubair, D. Wei, T. Al-Samman, Synergistic effect of Y and Ca addition on the texture modification in AZ31B magnesium alloy, Acta Materialia 233 (2022) 117990.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117990

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117990 2022

  30. [30]

    McLean, Grain Boundaries in Metals,[M] Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1957

    D. McLean, Grain Boundaries in Metals,[M] Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1957

    1957

  31. [32]

    Wagih, P

    M. Wagih, P. M. Larsen, C. A. Schuh, Learning grain boundary segregation energy spectra in polycrystals, Nature Communications 11 (1) (2020) 6376.doi:https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20083-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20083-6 2020

  32. [33]

    Wagih, C

    M. Wagih, C. A. Schuh, Learning Grain-Boundary Segregation: From First Principles to Polycrystals, Physical Review Letters 129 (4) (2022) 046102.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.046102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.046102 2022

  33. [34]

    Wagih, C

    M. Wagih, C. A. Schuh, Grain boundary segregation beyond the dilute limit: Separating the two contributions of site spectrality and solute interactions, Acta Materialia 199 (2020) 63–72.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.022 2020

  34. [35]

    Bond-Focused

    T. P. Matson, C. A. Schuh, A “Bond-Focused” Local Atomic Environment Represen- tation for a High Throughput Solute Interaction Spectrum Analysis, Acta Materialia (2024) 120275doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120275

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120275 2024

  35. [36]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Deng, Grain boundary segregation prediction with a dual-solute model, Physical Review Materials 8 (10) (2024) 103605.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.8.103605

    2024

  36. [37]

    Tuchinda, C

    N. Tuchinda, C. A. Schuh, Grain size dependencies of intergranular solute segregation in nanocrystalline materials, Acta Materialia 226 (2022) 117614.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117614

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117614 2022

  37. [38]

    Tuchinda, C

    N. Tuchinda, C. A. Schuh, The vibrational entropy spectra of grain boundary segregation in polycrystals, Acta Materialia 245 (2023) 118630.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actamat.2022.118630. 28

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [39]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Deng, Hydrostatic pressure-induced transition in grain boundary seg- regation tendency in nanocrystalline metals, Scripta Materialia 234 (2023) 115576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115576

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115576 2023

  39. [40]

    Ben Britton, Tea-Sung Jun, Weimin Gan, Michael Hofmann, Fionn P.E

    Z. Zhang, C. Deng, Grain boundary interstitial segregation in substitutional binary al- loys, Acta Materialia 291 (2025) 121019.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat. 2025.121019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat 2025

  40. [41]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Deng, Disconnection formation via segregation-induced grain boundary phase transitions, Acta Materialia 309 (2026) 122077.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actamat.2026.122077

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [42]

    Nenninger, F

    T. Nenninger, F. Sansoz, Solute clustering in polycrystals: Unveiling the interplay of grain boundary junction and long-range solute attraction effects, Acta Materialia 290 (2025) 120946.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120946

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120946 2025

  42. [43]

    Nenninger, F

    T. Nenninger, F. Sansoz, Local atomic environment analysis of short and long-range solute-solute interactions in a symmetric tilt grain boundary, Scripta Materialia 222 (2023) 115045.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115045

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115045 2023

  43. [44]

    Nikitin, F

    P. Nikitin, F. Sansoz, Size-dependent attraction of Cu solutes to clusters formed at Ag grain boundaries, Physical Review Materials 9 (9) (2025) 093603.doi:https://doi. org/10.1103/t7qb-g8n6

    work page doi:10.1103/t7qb-g8n6 2025

  44. [45]

    Wagih, Y

    M. Wagih, Y. Naunheim, T. Lei, C. A. Schuh, Designing for cooperative grain boundary segregation in multicomponent alloys, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (38) (2025) e2511930122.doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2511930122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2511930122 2025

  45. [46]

    C. Hu, J. Luo, Data-driven prediction of grain boundary segregation and disordering in high-entropy alloys in a 5D space, Materials Horizons 9 (3) (2022) 1023–1035.doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MH01204E

    work page doi:10.1039/d1mh01204e 2022

  46. [47]

    S. Das, N. Oyeniran, J. Walter, A. Gesch, C. Hu, Bayesian Optimization of Grain- Boundary Segregation in High-Entropy Alloys, npj Computational Materials 11 (1) (2025) 371.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01850-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01850-9 2025

  47. [48]

    Aksoy, J

    D. Aksoy, J. Luo, P. Cao, T. J. Rupert, A machine learning framework for the prediction of grain boundary segregation in chemically complex environments, Mod- elling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 32 (6) (2024) 065011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ad585f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-651x/ad585f 2024

  48. [49]

    J. R. Trelewicz, C. A. Schuh, Grain boundary segregation and thermodynamically stable binary nanocrystalline alloys, Physical Review B 79 (9) (2009) 094112.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.094112 2009

  49. [50]

    Y. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Ju, S. Shi, Materials discovery and design using machine learning, Journal of Materiomics 3 (3) (2017) 159–177.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat. 2017.08.002. 29

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmat 2017

  50. [51]

    Raccuglia, K

    P. Raccuglia, K. C. Elbert, P. D. F. Adler, C. Falk, M. B. Wenny, A. Mollo, M. Zeller, S. A. Friedler, J. Schrier, A. J. Norquist, Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments, Nature 533 (7601) (2016) 73–76.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature17439

    2016

  51. [52]

    J. Fang, M. Xie, X. He, J. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, Q. Jin, Machine learning accelerates the materials discovery, Materials Today Communications 33 (2022) 104900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104900

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104900 2022

  52. [53]

    Tuchinda, C

    N. Tuchinda, C. A. Schuh, Computed entropy spectra for grain boundary segregation in polycrystals, npj Computational Materials 10 (1) (2024) 72.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41524-024-01260-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01260-3 2024

  53. [54]

    A. P. Bart´ ok, R. Kondor, G. Cs´ anyi, On representing chemical environments, Physi- cal Review B 87 (18) (2013) 184115.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87. 184115

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87 2013

  54. [55]

    Assessment of kinetic theories for moderately dense granular binary mixtures: Shear viscosity coefficient.Phys

    J. Laakso, L. Himanen, H. Homm, E. V. Morooka, M. O. J. J¨ ager, M. Todorovi´ c, P. Rinke, Updates to the DScribe library: New descriptors and derivatives, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 158 (23) (2023) 234802.doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0151031

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2023

  55. [56]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, the Journal of machine Learning research 12 (2011) 2825–2830

    2011

  56. [57]

    Z. Xie, A. Atila, J. Gu´ enol´ e, S. Korte-Kerzel, T. Al-Samman, U. Kerzel, Predicting grain boundary segregation in magnesium alloys: An atomistically informed machine learning approach, Journal of Magnesium and Alloys (2025).doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jma.2025.03.021

    2025

  57. [58]

    S. Pal, K. V. Reddy, T. Yu, J. Xiao, C. Deng, The spectrum of atomic excess free volume in grain boundaries, Journal of Materials Science 56 (19) (2021) 11511–11528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06028-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-021-06028-4 2021

  58. [59]

    T. Chen, C. Guestrin, XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, San Francisco California USA, 2016, pp. 785–794.doi:https://doi. org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

    work page doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 2016

  59. [60]

    L. Yuan, Z. Ma, Z. Pan, Multi-task learning of solute segregation energy across multiple alloy systems, Computational Materials Science 253 (2025) 113846.doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.113846

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.113846 2025

  60. [61]

    Computations of compressible multifluids

    S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117 (1) (1995) 1–19.doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph. 1995.1039. 30

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph 1995

  61. [63]

    Stukowski, V

    A. Stukowski, V. V. Bulatov, A. Arsenlis, Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 20 (8) (2012) 085007.doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/ 085007

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/ 2012

  62. [64]

    P. M. Larsen, S. Schmidt, J. Schiøtz, Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 24 (5) (2016) 055007.doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007 2016

  63. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21286 , year=

    T. Liang, K. Xu, E. Lindgren, Z. Chen, R. Zhao, J. Liu, B. Tang, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, K. Song, P. Ying, H. Dong, S. Chen, P. Erhart, Z. Fan, T. Ala-Nissila, J. Xu, NEP89: Universal neuroevolution potential for inorganic and organic materials across 89 elements (2025).arXiv:2504.21286,doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.21286

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.21286 2025

  64. [66]

    Löffler, F

    P. Hirel, Atomsk: A tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files, Computer Physics Communications 197 (2015) 212–219.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc. 2015.07.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc 2015

  65. [67]

    H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, J. R. Haak, Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath, The Journal of Chemical Physics 81 (8) (1984) 3684–3690.doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118

    work page doi:10.1063/1.448118 1984

  66. [68]

    Journal of Applied Physics52(12), 7182–7190 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328693

    M. Parrinello, A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method, Journal of Applied Physics 52 (12) (1981) 7182–7190.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.328693

    work page doi:10.1063/1.328693 1981

  67. [69]

    Z. Fan, Y. Wang, P. Ying, K. Song, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Zeng, K. Xu, E. Lindgren, J. M. Rahm, A. J. Gabourie, J. Liu, H. Dong, J. Wu, Y. Chen, Z. Zhong, J. Sun, P. Erhart, Y. Su, T. Ala-Nissila, GPUMD: A package for constructing accurate machine- learned potentials and performing highly efficient atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 157 ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0106617 2022

  68. [70]

    K. Xu, H. Bu, S. Pan, E. Lindgren, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, J. Liu, K. Song, B. Xu, Y. Li, T. Hainer, L. Svensson, J. Wiktor, R. Zhao, H. Huang, C. Qian, S. Zhang, Z. Zeng, B. Zhang, B. Tang, Y. Xiao, Z. Yan, J. Shi, Z. Liang, J. Wang, T. Liang, S. Cao, Y. Wang, P. Ying, N. Xu, C. Chen, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Wu, W. Jiang, E. Berger, Y. Li, S. Chen, A. J. Gabourie,...

    work page doi:10.1002/mgea.70028 2025

  69. [71]

    Sadigh, P

    B. Sadigh, P. Erhart, A. Stukowski, A. Caro, E. Martinez, L. Zepeda-Ruiz, Scalable parallel Monte Carlo algorithm for atomistic simulations of precipitation in alloys, Phys- ical Review B 85 (18) (2012) 184203.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85. 184203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85 2012

  70. [72]

    Structural Re- laxation Made Simple.Physical Review Letters, 97(17):170201, 10 2006

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, P. Gumbsch, Structural Relaxation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 97 (17) (2006) 170201.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170201 2006

  71. [73]

    Gu´ enol´ e, W

    J. Gu´ enol´ e, W. G. N¨ ohring, A. Vaid, F. Houll´ e, Z. Xie, A. Prakash, E. Bitzek, Assessment and optimization of the fast inertial relaxation engine (fire) for energy minimization in atomistic simulations and its implementation in lammps, Computational Materials Sci- ence 175 (2020) 109584.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109584

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109584 2020

  72. [74]

    Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scandinavian jour- nal of statistics (1985) 171–178

    A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scandinavian jour- nal of statistics (1985) 171–178

    1985

  73. [75]

    C. Lea, M. P. Seah, Site competition in surface segregation, Surface Science 53 (1) (1975) 272–285.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(75)90129-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0039-6028(75)90129-6 1975

  74. [76]

    M. Bian, X. Huang, Y. Chino, Solute segregation assisted grain boundary precipitation and its impact to ductility of a precipitation-hardenable magnesium alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 819 (2021) 141481.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. msea.2021.141481

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2021

  75. [77]

    Z. Yang, A. Ma, J. Jiang, B. Xu, J. Sun, Age-hardening response limited by solute clustering in an ultrafine-grained Mg–Gd–Ag alloy, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1052 (2026) 186117.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2026.186117

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2026.186117 2026

  76. [78]

    Z. Yang, A. Ma, B. Xu, G. Wang, J. Jiang, J. Sun, Towards age-hardening ability enhancement and high strength in Mg–Gd–Ag alloy by balancing grain refinement and weakening of dynamic precipitation, Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 13 (4) (2025) 1699–1720.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2024.06.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jma.2024.06.032 2025

  77. [79]

    H. Zhou, G. Cheng, X. Ma, W. Xu, S. Mathaudhu, Q. Wang, Y. Zhu, Effect of Ag on interfacial segregation in Mg–Gd–Y–(Ag)–Zr alloy, Acta Materialia 95 (2015) 20–29. doi:https://doi.org/110.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.020

    2015

  78. [80]

    M. Bian, I. Nakatsugawa, Y. Matsuoka, X. Huang, Y. Tsukada, T. Koyama, Y. Chino, Improving the mechanical and corrosion properties of pure magnesium by parts-per- million-level alloying, Acta Materialia 241 (2022) 118393.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.actamat.2022.118393

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [81]

    X. Qian, Z. Dong, B. Jiang, Z. Zheng, A. Zhang, C. Li, L. Vitos, Mechanism of alloying element co-segregation at the grain boundary and its influence on mechanical properties in Mg-Zn-Ca alloy, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 267 (2026) 132–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2025.12.016. 32

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2025.12.016 2026

  80. [82]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Xie, S. Liu, Y. He, R. Wang, D. Fang, W. Fu, Y. Jiao, R. Wu, Significantly enhanced grain boundary Zn and Ca co-segregation of dilute Mg alloy via trace Sm addition, Materials Science and Engineering: A 831 (2022) 142259.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142259

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.142259 2022

Showing first 80 references.