pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21075 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Performance of the LHCb muon detector in Run 3

A.Balla, A.Cardini, A.Casais Vidal, A.Chubykin, A.Contu, A.Dzyuba, A.Granik, A.Lai, A.Pastore, A.Saputi, A.Satta, B.Schmidt, B.Sciascia, C.Satriano, C.Y.Yu, D.Brundu, D.Ilin, D.Pinci, E.De Lucia, E.Minucci, E.Santovetti, F.Archilli, F.Debernardis, F.Dettori, F.Manganella, G.De Robertis, G.Felici, G.Graziani, G.Manca, G.Martellotti, G.Passaleva, J.Swallow, L.Congedo, L.Dreyfus, L.Paolucci, M.Anelli, M.Atzeni, M.Carletti, M.De Serio, M.Gatta, M.Palutan, M.Santimaria, N.Bondar, P.Albicocco, P.Ciambrone, P.De Simone, R.Kristic, R.Litvinov, R.Oldeman, R.Quagliani, R.Santacesaria, R.Vazquez Gomez, S.Belin, S.Cadeddu, S.Cal\`i, S.Kotriakhova, S.Mariani, S.Simone, S.Vecchi, S.Zhang, T.Rong, T.Schneider, V.Chulikov, W.Baldini

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords LHCbmuon detectorRun 3muon identificationefficiencyhadron misidentificationcalibrationLHC
0
0 comments X

The pith

The upgraded LHCb muon detector achieves over 90% muon identification efficiency with sub-percent hadron misidentification in Run 3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the operation, calibration, and measured performance of the LHCb muon detector after hardware upgrades for the fivefold higher luminosity of LHC Run 3. New readout electronics and refined trigger algorithms were introduced to maintain identification quality under increased particle rates. On 2024 calibration samples the team reports muon efficiency above 90% while keeping the probability of mistaking hadrons for muons below one percent by using the spatial pattern of detector hits. A sympathetic reader would care because reliable muon tagging is required for the bulk of LHCb physics results, and failure to sustain this capability would waste the extra data collected at higher luminosity.

Core claim

The muon identification algorithms, improved to handle higher rates, achieve a muon detection efficiency above 90 percent with sub-percent hadron misidentification probability by exploiting the pattern of hits recorded in the muon detector, as demonstrated on data calibration samples collected in 2024.

What carries the argument

The pattern of hits in the muon detector, which the identification algorithms use to distinguish true muons from hadrons.

Load-bearing premise

The 2024 calibration samples accurately represent the particle rates, backgrounds, and conditions present in the full physics dataset collected during Run 3.

What would settle it

A later measurement on Run 3 physics data showing muon identification efficiency below 90 percent or hadron misidentification probability above one percent when the same algorithms and hit-pattern criteria are applied would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21075 by A.Balla, A.Cardini, A.Casais Vidal, A.Chubykin, A.Contu, A.Dzyuba, A.Granik, A.Lai, A.Pastore, A.Saputi, A.Satta, B.Schmidt, B.Sciascia, C.Satriano, C.Y.Yu, D.Brundu, D.Ilin, D.Pinci, E.De Lucia, E.Minucci, E.Santovetti, F.Archilli, F.Debernardis, F.Dettori, F.Manganella, G.De Robertis, G.Felici, G.Graziani, G.Manca, G.Martellotti, G.Passaleva, J.Swallow, L.Congedo, L.Dreyfus, L.Paolucci, M.Anelli, M.Atzeni, M.Carletti, M.De Serio, M.Gatta, M.Palutan, M.Santimaria, N.Bondar, P.Albicocco, P.Ciambrone, P.De Simone, R.Kristic, R.Litvinov, R.Oldeman, R.Quagliani, R.Santacesaria, R.Vazquez Gomez, S.Belin, S.Cadeddu, S.Cal\`i, S.Kotriakhova, S.Mariani, S.Simone, S.Vecchi, S.Zhang, T.Rong, T.Schneider, V.Chulikov, W.Baldini.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Layout of the upgraded LHCb detector. b Upgrade I detector [1]. The muon stations in th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Front view of one quadrant of M2 showing the four regions. The intersection of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the LHCb trigger system. Figure 3: The LHCb trigger scheme in Run 2 [2]. [1]. Both these changes were aim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average currents for each station and region of the detector as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: time spectrum for a nODE channel in region R3 of station M4. The blue vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sketch of the method used to measure the hit efficiency of station M4. Details are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Horizontal (red) and vertical (blue) spatial resolutions of each station and region of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hit efficiency for every station and region of the detector. The statistical uncertainties [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Invariant mass spectra of the calibration samples with the fit curves overlaid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Background subtracted distributions of log(χ 2 corr) for muons and hadrons with a minimum momentum of 10 GeV/c. The contribution of decays in flight is visible as a peak at lower χ 2 corr values in the pion and kaon distributions. 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 Efficiency ( ) 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 P r o b a b i l i t y ( h ) LHCb 2024 2 corr & IsMuon K p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: ROC curve of the product of the IsMuon and χ 2 corr operators for each hadron type for tracks having a momentum greater than 10 GeV/c and a transverse momentum greater than 0.8 GeV/c. tion probability of high-momentum protons in each of the four detector regions using the IsMuon selection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Efficiency and hadron misidentification probability for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Muon efficiency and proton misidentification probability of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Proton misidentification probability for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In Run 3 of the LHC, the instantaneous luminosity at the LHCb interaction point has been increased by a factor of five, from $4\times 10^{32}\rm{cm}^{-2}\rm{s}^{-1}$ to $2\times 10^{33}\rm{cm}^{-2}\rm{s}^{-1}$. Several hardware interventions, including a complete overhaul of the readout electronics, have been carried out on the muon detector. The muon identification algorithms in the software trigger were improved with the aim of ensuring Run 2 performance under a higher particle rate. The operation and calibration of the upgraded muon detector are presented. The muon detection efficiency and muon identification performance are evaluated on data calibration samples collected during the year 2024. A muon identification efficiency above 90\% with sub-percent hadron misidentification probability is achieved by exploiting the pattern of hits in the muon detector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes hardware upgrades to the LHCb muon detector for Run 3 (new readout electronics and a five-fold luminosity increase to 2×10^33 cm^{-2}s^{-1}), improvements to the software trigger muon identification algorithms, and the detector's operation and calibration. Performance is evaluated on 2024 data calibration samples, with the central claim being a muon identification efficiency above 90% and sub-percent hadron misidentification probability obtained by exploiting hit patterns in the muon detector.

Significance. If the reported performance holds under full Run 3 conditions, the results confirm that the upgraded muon system maintains high efficiency and low misidentification rates despite substantially higher particle rates. This is important for LHCb's physics program, as muon identification underpins many B- and D-meson analyses. The data-driven calibration approach on real 2024 samples provides direct empirical support rather than relying solely on simulation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The muon identification efficiency and misidentification probabilities are measured exclusively on 2024 calibration samples (Abstract). The manuscript must demonstrate that these samples accurately represent the instantaneous luminosity, pile-up, background composition, and time-dependent effects across the full Run 3 physics dataset; explicit cross-checks (e.g., rate comparisons, efficiency stability versus time or luminosity, or direct comparisons to physics samples) are required. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the >90% efficiency with sub-percent misID is achieved under Run 3 conditions.
  2. [Performance evaluation section] The abstract states that systematic uncertainties, selection criteria, and statistical methods are used to derive the efficiency and misidentification rates, but without the full text these cannot be verified for robustness (e.g., control of backgrounds in the calibration samples or propagation of uncertainties). The paper should provide a dedicated section detailing these, including any data-driven corrections or simulation cross-checks.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains LaTeX markup (e.g., rm and math mode) that should be properly rendered or removed in the published version for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the recognition of the importance of the muon detector performance for the LHCb physics program. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The muon identification efficiency and misidentification probabilities are measured exclusively on 2024 calibration samples (Abstract). The manuscript must demonstrate that these samples accurately represent the instantaneous luminosity, pile-up, background composition, and time-dependent effects across the full Run 3 physics dataset; explicit cross-checks (e.g., rate comparisons, efficiency stability versus time or luminosity, or direct comparisons to physics samples) are required. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the >90% efficiency with sub-percent misID is achieved under Run 3 conditions.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration of representativeness is essential for the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (5.2) to the performance evaluation section containing the requested cross-checks. These include direct comparisons of instantaneous luminosity and pile-up distributions between the calibration samples and the full 2024 physics dataset, efficiency stability versus time and integrated luminosity, and data-driven verification of background composition. The results confirm that the calibration samples accurately reflect Run 3 operating conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Performance evaluation section] The abstract states that systematic uncertainties, selection criteria, and statistical methods are used to derive the efficiency and misidentification rates, but without the full text these cannot be verified for robustness (e.g., control of backgrounds in the calibration samples or propagation of uncertainties). The paper should provide a dedicated section detailing these, including any data-driven corrections or simulation cross-checks.

    Authors: We have added a dedicated subsection (5.3) that fully details the systematic uncertainties, selection criteria, and statistical methods. This includes explicit description of background control in the calibration samples via data-driven techniques, the full propagation of uncertainties, and simulation cross-checks. The revised text now allows independent verification of the robustness of the quoted efficiency and misidentification values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical efficiencies measured directly on 2024 calibration data

full rationale

The paper presents direct experimental measurements of muon detection efficiency (>90%) and hadron misidentification probability (sub-percent) evaluated on collected 2024 calibration samples. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are present that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The central claims are statistical evaluations on data rather than theoretical derivations, so the result is self-contained against external benchmarks and independent of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on empirical data evaluation using standard detector calibration techniques rather than new theoretical constructs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions about muon detector response, particle interactions, and calibration sample representativeness in high-energy physics experiments
    Invoked implicitly when reporting efficiencies from calibration data without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5746 in / 1068 out tokens · 46348 ms · 2026-05-09T22:10:51.424190+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr.et al.,The LHCb detector at the LHC, JINST3 (2008) S08005

    2008

  3. [3]

    A. A. Alves Jr.et al.,Performance of the LHCb muon system, JINST8(2013) P02022,arXiv:1211.1346

    work page arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Archilliet al.,Performance of the muon identification at LHCb, JINST8(2013) P10020,arXiv:1306.0249

    F. Archilliet al.,Performance of the muon identification at LHCb, JINST8(2013) P10020,arXiv:1306.0249

    work page arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    F. P. Albicoccoet al.,Long-term operation of the multi-wire-proportional- chambers of the LHCb muon system, JINST14(2019) P11031,arXiv:1908.02178

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    LHCb collaboration,LHCb PID Upgrade Technical Design ReportCERN-LHCC- 2013-022, CERN, Geneva, 2013

    2013

  7. [7]

    L. Anderliniet al.,Measurement of the front-end dead-time of the LHCb muon detector and evaluation of its contribution to the muon detection inefficiency, JINST 11(2016) P04010,arXiv:1602.08699. 18

    work page arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    LHCb collaboration,LHCb muon system: Technical Design ReportCERN-LHCC- 2001-010, CERN, Geneva, 2001

    2001

  9. [9]

    https://cds.cern

    LHCb collaboration,Framework TDR for the LHCb Upgrade II: Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era, CERN, 2021. https://cds.cern. ch/record/2776420/

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    LHCb Upgrade II Scoping Document

    LHCb collaboration,LHCb Upgrade II Scoping Document, CERN, Geneva, 2024. doi: 10.17181/CERN.2RXP.HDK0

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.2rxp.hdk0 2024

  11. [11]

    Cadedduet al.,The nSYNC ASIC for the new readout electronics of the LHCb Muon Detector Upgrade, Nucl

    S. Cadedduet al.,The nSYNC ASIC for the new readout electronics of the LHCb Muon Detector Upgrade, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A936(2019) 378

    2019

  12. [12]

    Moreiraet al.,The GBT Project, 2009

    P. Moreiraet al.,The GBT Project, 2009. doi: 10.5170/CERN-2009-006.342

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2009-006.342 2009

  13. [13]

    Aaijet al.,A comprehensive real-time analysis model at the LHCb experiment, JINST14(2019) P04006,arXiv:1903.01360

    R. Aaijet al.,A comprehensive real-time analysis model at the LHCb experiment, JINST14(2019) P04006,arXiv:1903.01360

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    E. Dane, G. Penso, D. Pinci, and A. Sarti,Detailed study of the gain of the MWPCs for the LHCb muon system, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A572(2007) 682

    2007

  15. [15]

    Sarti, R

    A. Sarti, R. Nobrega, and A. Kashchuk,Procedure for determination and setting of thresholds implemented in the LHCb Muon system, CERN, Geneva, 2008. https: //cds.cern.ch/record/1131816

    work page arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Adinolfiet al.,LHCb data quality monitoring, J

    M. Adinolfiet al.,LHCb data quality monitoring, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.898(2017) 092027

    2017

  17. [17]

    Paluch, R

    R. Paluch, R. Oldeman, and B. Schmidt,Additional shielding behind the LHCb muon detector, CERN, Geneva, 2013.https://cds.cern.ch/record/1630392

    work page arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Follin and D

    F. Follin and D. Jacquet,Implementation and experience with luminosity levelling with offset beam, inICFA Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, 183–187, 2014,arXiv:1410.3667

    work page arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    LHCb collaboration,LHCb PLUME: Probe for LUminosity MEasurementCERN- LHCC-2021-002, CERN, Geneva, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    LHCb collaboration,PLUME detector performance during the 2024 LHCb data taking campaign, CERN, 2025.https://cds.cern.ch/record/2925973

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Boente Garcia et al.,High-density gas target at the LHCb experiment, Phys

    O. Boente Garciaet al.,High-density gas target at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams27(2024) 111001,arXiv:2407.14200

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Valassiet al.,CORAL and COOL during the LHC Long Shutdown., J

    LHCb, CMS, ATLAS collaboration, A. Valassiet al.,CORAL and COOL during the LHC Long Shutdown., J. Phys. Conf. Ser.513(2014) 042045

    2014

  23. [23]

    Anderlini et al., Muon identification for LHCb Run 3 , JINST 15 (2020) T12005, arXiv:2008.01579

    L. Anderliniet al.,Muon identification for LHCb Run 3, JINST15(2020) T12005, arXiv:2008.01579

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Lanfranchiet al.,The Muon Identification Procedure of the LHCb Experiment for the First Data, CERN, Geneva, 2009.https://cds.cern.ch/record/1202759

    G. Lanfranchiet al.,The Muon Identification Procedure of the LHCb Experiment for the First Data, CERN, Geneva, 2009.https://cds.cern.ch/record/1202759. 19

    work page arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    De Cian, S

    M. De Cian, S. Farry, P. Seyfert, and S. Stahl,Fast neural-net based fake track rejection in the LHCb reconstruction, CERN, Geneva, 2017. https://cds.cern. ch/record/2255039

    work page arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Pivk and F

    M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder,SPlot: A Statistical tool to unfold data distributions, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A555(2005) 356, arXiv:physics/0402083

    work page arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Skwarnicki,A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-prime and Upsilon resonances, PhD thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, 1986, DESY-F31-86-02

    T. Skwarnicki,A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-prime and Upsilon resonances, PhD thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, 1986, DESY-F31-86-02. 20

    1986