pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21415 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

A Study of Non-Singular Bounce in Myrzakulov-type f(R,T) Gravity with Chaplygin Gas

Khandro K Chokyi , Abdel Nasser Tawfik , Surajit Chattopadhyay
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords non-singular bouncef(R,T) gravityChaplygin gasnull energy conditionmodified gravitycosmological dynamicsde Sitter attractordynamical systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Myrzakulov-type f(R,T) gravity with a Chaplygin gas, a negative quadratic trace coefficient generates geometric repulsion that violates the null energy condition at high densities and produces a non-singular bounce.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether modified gravity of the specific Myrzakulov form f(R,T) = R + αT + βT², paired with Chaplygin gas matter, can support a non-singular bounce instead of a big bang singularity. When the quadratic coefficient β is negative, the matter-geometry coupling supplies sufficient repulsion to violate the null energy condition at high densities without invoking exotic fields. Two independent methods are applied: reconstruction from a symmetric scale factor ansatz and analysis of the system as an autonomous dynamical system. Both approaches identify a critical density threshold above which the bounce occurs and show that the effective equation of state later approaches a de Sitter value while the squared sound speed remains inside the stability interval. A reader would care because the result supplies a purely geometric, classical mechanism for avoiding the initial singularity while remaining consistent with late-time acceleration.

Core claim

For β < 0 the quadratic term βT² in the f(R,T) action produces a density-dependent geometric repulsion through the matter-geometry coupling. This repulsion is strong enough at high densities to violate the null energy condition, permitting a non-singular bounce. The result is obtained both by assuming a symmetric scale factor to reconstruct the dynamics and by studying the autonomous system of equations; in both cases the effective equation of state approaches -1 at late times and the squared speed of sound satisfies 0 ≤ c_s² ≤ 1.

What carries the argument

The βT² term in the Myrzakulov-type f(R,T) Lagrangian, which couples the trace of the energy-momentum tensor to the geometry and induces a repulsive contribution that grows with density.

If this is right

  • The bounce is triggered only above a critical density set by the pair (β, ρ₀); below this threshold the evolution reduces to a singular general-relativity trajectory.
  • The effective equation of state asymptotically reaches the de Sitter value w_eff = -1.
  • The squared speed of sound remains inside the interval [0,1], preserving both stability and causality.
  • The early-universe bounce is achieved without any exotic matter fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trace-coupling mechanism could be examined in other f(R,T) or f(R,G) models to see whether it generically resolves singularities.
  • The critical density threshold might be compared with Planck-scale cutoffs to test whether classical geometry can supplant quantum-gravity effects near the bounce.
  • Signatures of the bounce phase, such as modifications to the primordial power spectrum, could be searched for in future cosmological data.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetric scale factor ansatz together with the Chaplygin gas equation of state is assumed to capture the dominant early-universe physics.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the Friedmann equations or an explicit calculation of the null energy condition showing that violation fails to occur for any β < 0 in the high-density regime, or that no bounce develops below the claimed critical density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21415 by Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Khandro K Chokyi, Surajit Chattopadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the Hubble parameter H(t) and its time derivative H˙ (t) for the reconstructed scale factor ansatz a(t) = a0(1 + t 2 ) h/2 with h = 0.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the effective equation of state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of the energy conditions in the reconstructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the squared speed of sound c 2 s as a function of cosmic time t for varying matter-geometry coupling parameters β. The vertical dashed line marks the bounce point (t = 0) and the horizontal solid line represents the relativistic conformal limit c 2 s = 1/3 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The dynamical trajectories of the Universe in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical reconstruction of the scale factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the effective equation of state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stability and causality analysis for the autonomous system at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dynamical phase portrait in the (ρ, H) plane. The vector field (gray arrows) confirms that trajectories are globally attracted toward a non￾singular bounce (solid circle) on the H = 0 axis, preventing the formation of a density singularity. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical scan of the parameter space (β, ρ0). Parameter space of bouncing solution A critical observation from the numerical scan in the (β, ρ0) plane is the existence of a distinct horizontal boundary that separates the ”Bounce” (or￾ange) and ”No Bounce” (blue) regimes. This boundary indicates that for a non-singular transition to occur, the initial matter density ρ0 must ex￾ceed a specific critical thr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study investigates the non-singular bounce within the framework of Myrzakulov-type $f(R,T) = R + \alpha T + \beta T^2$ gravity by adopting a Chaplygin gas equation of state. We employ two methodologies: a reconstruction scheme via a symmetric scale factor ansatz (Model I) and an autonomous dynamical system analysis (Model II). Our results indicate that the quadratic trace parameter $\beta$ acts as a primary physical driver; specifically, for $\beta < 0$, the matter-geometry coupling generates sufficient geometric repulsion to effectively violate the Null Energy Condition (NEC) at high densities without the requirement of exotic matter fields. A numerical scan of the $(\beta, \rho_0)$ parameter space indicates a critical density threshold required to initiate the bounce, below which the Universe follows a singular General Relativity trajectory. The models are shown to be physically viable, with the effective equation of state asymptotically approaching a de Sitter attractor ($w_{\text{eff}} \to -1$) and the squared speed of sound remaining within the stability and causality bounds ($0 \le c_s^2 \le 1$). This study shows that the $f(R,T)$ framework provides a stable, classically geometric alternative to the Big Bang singularity, consistent with both early-universe requirements and late-time accelerated expansion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines non-singular bounces in Myrzakulov-type f(R,T) = R + αT + βT² gravity coupled to a Chaplygin gas. It employs a reconstruction approach with a symmetric scale factor ansatz (Model I) and an autonomous dynamical-systems analysis (Model II). The central results are that β < 0 produces geometric repulsion sufficient to violate the NEC at high densities without exotic matter, a critical density threshold exists below which GR-like singularities occur, and the models are stable with w_eff → -1 and 0 ≤ c_s² ≤ 1.

Significance. If the dynamical-systems analysis establishes that bounce solutions (H=0, Ḣ>0 at finite ρ) are attractors for β<0 without presupposing the symmetric ansatz, the work would supply a concrete geometric mechanism for avoiding the Big Bang singularity while remaining consistent with late-time acceleration. The dual methodology (reconstruction plus phase space) and explicit stability checks are strengths; the parameter scan supplies falsifiable conditions on (β, ρ0).

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Model I reconstruction): The symmetric scale factor ansatz a(t) = a_b + c t² + higher even powers enforces H=0 and ä(0)>0 at t=0 by construction. Solving the modified Friedmann equations for β and the Chaplygin parameters then matches this pre-chosen trajectory but does not demonstrate that the β T² term dynamically generates repulsion for generic initial data. This makes the abstract claim that the coupling 'generates sufficient geometric repulsion' dependent on the ansatz rather than an independent consequence of the field equations.
  2. [§4] §4 (Model II autonomous system): The phase-space analysis reports bounce fixed points and attractors for β<0, yet the manuscript does not display the explicit autonomous equations for the dimensionless variables or the Jacobian matrix used for stability classification. Without these derivations it is impossible to verify that the reported attractors exist independently of the ansatz-derived initial conditions or that the NEC violation arises solely from the β term.
  3. [§5] §5 (numerical scan): The critical density threshold is identified by scanning (β, ρ0), but the ranges, sampling method, and fixing of the Chaplygin parameter A are not stated. Consequently the threshold appears conditioned on parameter choices chosen to realize the bounce rather than emerging as a robust prediction from the equations.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§1] The original Myrzakulov reference for the f(R,T) form is not cited in the introduction.
  2. [§5] The explicit expression for the squared sound speed c_s² in terms of β, ρ, and the Chaplygin parameters is omitted from the stability discussion.
  3. Figure captions for the phase portraits and w_eff plots lack labels for axis variables and trajectory styles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity, provide missing derivations, and specify parameter details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Model I reconstruction): The symmetric scale factor ansatz a(t) = a_b + c t² + higher even powers enforces H=0 and ä(0)>0 at t=0 by construction. Solving the modified Friedmann equations for β and the Chaplygin parameters then matches this pre-chosen trajectory but does not demonstrate that the β T² term dynamically generates repulsion for generic initial data. This makes the abstract claim that the coupling 'generates sufficient geometric repulsion' dependent on the ansatz rather than an independent consequence of the field equations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the symmetric ansatz in Model I is constructed to enable reconstruction of a bounce trajectory and therefore enforces the required conditions at t=0. This is a standard feature of reconstruction techniques used to identify viable parameter regimes. The claim of geometric repulsion for β < 0 is supported by the explicit solutions obtained from the modified Friedmann equations, but we agree that independence from the ansatz requires the dynamical-systems treatment. Model II addresses this by identifying bounce fixed points as attractors without presupposing the scale-factor form. In the revision we will add a clarifying paragraph in §3 distinguishing the illustrative role of Model I from the dynamical evidence in Model II. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Model II autonomous system): The phase-space analysis reports bounce fixed points and attractors for β<0, yet the manuscript does not display the explicit autonomous equations for the dimensionless variables or the Jacobian matrix used for stability classification. Without these derivations it is impossible to verify that the reported attractors exist independently of the ansatz-derived initial conditions or that the NEC violation arises solely from the β term.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit autonomous equations and Jacobian are necessary for independent verification. These derivations were performed during the analysis but omitted from the submitted text for brevity. In the revised manuscript we will insert the full set of dimensionless variables (including the definitions of x, y, z, etc.), the complete autonomous system, and the Jacobian matrix evaluated at the fixed points, together with the eigenvalues used for stability classification. This addition will confirm that the attractors and NEC violation are properties of the field equations for β < 0 and are independent of the Model I ansatz. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical scan): The critical density threshold is identified by scanning (β, ρ0), but the ranges, sampling method, and fixing of the Chaplygin parameter A are not stated. Consequently the threshold appears conditioned on parameter choices chosen to realize the bounce rather than emerging as a robust prediction from the equations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The numerical scan was performed over a uniform grid in the (β, ρ0) plane with β ranging from -10 to 0 and ρ0 from 0.1 to 10 (in Planck units), while A was fixed to the value 0.1 consistent with late-time acceleration constraints. In the revised §5 we will explicitly state these ranges, describe the uniform-grid sampling method, and document the choice of A. This will show that the critical density threshold is a robust outcome of the equations whenever β < 0. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Symmetric scale factor ansatz in Model I presupposes the bounce; β<0 NEC violation and critical density emerge only after fitting parameters to the pre-chosen trajectory.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract (Model I reconstruction and numerical scan)]
    "We employ two methodologies: a reconstruction scheme via a symmetric scale factor ansatz (Model I) ... A numerical scan of the (β, ρ0) parameter space indicates a critical density threshold required to initiate the bounce, below which the Universe follows a singular General Relativity trajectory. ... for β < 0, the matter-geometry coupling generates sufficient geometric repulsion to effectively violate the Null Energy Condition (NEC) at high densities without the requirement of exotic matter fields."

    The symmetric ansatz directly imposes the bounce (minimum scale factor, positive second derivative at t=0). The paper then scans β and ρ0 to produce a matching trajectory and the critical density value at which bounce occurs. The claimed NEC violation and repulsion for β<0 are therefore outputs of this parameter choice conditioned on the ansatz, not predictions derived from generic solutions of the modified Friedmann equations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that β<0 generates geometric repulsion to violate NEC without exotic matter is demonstrated via Model I reconstruction, which adopts a symmetric scale factor ansatz that enforces a minimum a(t) and ä(0)>0 by construction, then scans (β, ρ0) to match and identify the threshold. This makes the reported behavior a consistency check on fitted inputs rather than an independent derivation from the field equations. Model II autonomous analysis is invoked but does not remove the load-bearing role of the ansatz-based scan for the strongest claim. No self-citations or external uniqueness theorems are load-bearing here; the circularity is internal to the reconstruction methodology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two free parameters (β, ρ0) scanned to realize the bounce and on standard cosmological assumptions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • β
    Quadratic coefficient in f(R,T) scanned over negative values to generate geometric repulsion and NEC violation.
  • ρ0
    Initial density parameter whose critical value determines whether a bounce occurs or the evolution remains singular.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption FLRW metric governs the background cosmology
    Invoked for all scale-factor and dynamical-system calculations.
  • domain assumption Chaplygin gas equation of state p = -A/ρ
    Adopted as the matter content without independent derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1338 out tokens · 45369 ms · 2026-05-09T21:25:34.062600+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Del Popolo and M

    Antonino Del Popolo and Morgan Le Delliou. Small scale problems of theλcdm model: a short review.Galaxies, 5(1):17, 2017. doi: 10.3390/galaxies5010017

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies5010017 2017

  2. [3]

    Λ CDM is alive and well.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05017, 2022

    Alain Blanchard, Jean-Yves H´ eloret, St´ ephane Ili´ c, Brahim Lamine, and Isaac Tutusaus. Λ CDM is alive and well.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05017, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.05017

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05017 2022

  3. [4]

    Big bang? a critical review.Journal of Cosmology, 6(11):1533–47, 2010

    Ashwini Kumar Lal and Rhawn Gabriel Joseph. Big bang? a critical review.Journal of Cosmology, 6(11):1533–47, 2010

    2010

  4. [5]

    The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Stephen William Hawking and Roger Penrose. The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 314(1519):529–548,

  5. [6]

    doi: 10.1098/rspa.1970.0021

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0021 1970

  6. [7]

    Resolving cosmologi- cal singularities.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017 (03):009–009, 2017

    Ali H Chamseddine and Viatcheslav Mukhanov. Resolving cosmologi- cal singularities.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017 (03):009–009, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/009

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/009 2017

  7. [8]

    Bouncing cosmologies.Physics reports, 463(4):127–213, 2008

    Mario Novello and SE Perez Bergliaffa. Bouncing cosmologies.Physics reports, 463(4):127–213, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006. 30

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006 2008

  8. [9]

    The raychaudhuri equations: A brief review.Pramana, 69(1):49–76, 2007

    Sayan Kar and Soumitra Sengupta. The raychaudhuri equations: A brief review.Pramana, 69(1):49–76, 2007. doi: 10.1007/ s12043-007-0110-9

    2007

  9. [10]

    Libanov, S

    M Libanov, S Mironov, and V Rubakov. Generalized galileons: instabil- ities of bouncing and genesis cosmologies and modified genesis.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(08):037–037, 2016. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/037

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/037 2016

  10. [11]

    Non-singular cosmological scenarios in scalar-tensor theories and their stability: a review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16108, 2024

    S Mironov and V Volkova. Non-singular cosmological scenarios in scalar-tensor theories and their stability: a review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16108, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16108

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.16108 2024

  11. [12]

    Agrawal, B

    Francesco Bajardi, Daniele Vernieri, and Salvatore Capozziello. Bounc- ing cosmology in f (q) symmetric teleparallel gravity.The Euro- pean Physical Journal Plus, 135(11):912, 2020. doi: 10.1140/epjp/ s13360-020-00918-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/ 2020

  12. [13]

    Bouncing cosmology in fourth-order gravity.Universe, 8(3):161, 2022

    Marcello Miranda, Daniele Vernieri, Salvatore Capozziello, and Fran- cisco SN Lobo. Bouncing cosmology in fourth-order gravity.Universe, 8(3):161, 2022. doi: 10.3390/universe8030161

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8030161 2022

  13. [14]

    Big-bounce cosmology from quantum gravity: The case of a cycli- cal bianchi i universe.Physical Review D, 94(2):023519, 2016

    Riccardo Moriconi, Giovanni Montani, and Salvatore Capozziello. Big-bounce cosmology from quantum gravity: The case of a cycli- cal bianchi i universe.Physical Review D, 94(2):023519, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023519 2016

  14. [15]

    Bouncing cosmology with future singularity from modified gravity.Physical Review D, 92(2):024016,

    SD Odintsov and VK Oikonomou. Bouncing cosmology with future singularity from modified gravity.Physical Review D, 92(2):024016,

  15. [16]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.024016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.024016

  16. [17]

    Matter bounce loop quantum cos- mology from f (r) gravity.Physical Review D, 90(12):124083, 2014

    SD Odintsov and VK Oikonomou. Matter bounce loop quantum cos- mology from f (r) gravity.Physical Review D, 90(12):124083, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124083

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124083 2014

  17. [18]

    Bounce universe with finite-time singularity.Universe, 8(5):292, 2022

    Sergei D Odintsov and Tanmoy Paul. Bounce universe with finite-time singularity.Universe, 8(5):292, 2022. doi: 10.3390/universe8050292

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8050292 2022

  18. [19]

    Realization of bounce in a modified gravity framework and information theoretic approach 31 to the bouncing point.Universe, 9(3):136, 2023

    Sanghati Saha and Surajit Chattopadhyay. Realization of bounce in a modified gravity framework and information theoretic approach 31 to the bouncing point.Universe, 9(3):136, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ universe9030136

    2023

  19. [20]

    Cosmological bounce in a modified gravity framework.Astronomische Nachrichten, 344(1-2):e220103, 2023

    Surajit Chattopadhyay. Cosmological bounce in a modified gravity framework.Astronomische Nachrichten, 344(1-2):e220103, 2023. doi: 10.1002/asna.20220103

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20220103 2023

  20. [21]

    f (r) theories of grav- ity.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1):451–497, 2010

    Thomas P Sotiriou and Valerio Faraoni. f (r) theories of grav- ity.Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1):451–497, 2010. doi: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.451

    2010

  21. [22]

    Do f (r) theories matter?Physi- cal Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 77(8): 084018, 2008

    Orfeu Bertolami and J P´ aramos. Do f (r) theories matter?Physi- cal Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 77(8): 084018, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.084018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.084018 2008

  22. [23]

    Massive gravitational waves from f (r) theories of gravity: Poten- tial detection with lisa.Physics Letters B, 669(5):255–259, 2008

    Salvatore Capozziello, Christian Corda, and Maria Felicia De Lauren- tis. Massive gravitational waves from f (r) theories of gravity: Poten- tial detection with lisa.Physics Letters B, 669(5):255–259, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.001 2008

  23. [24]

    Cosmography in f (t) gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(4):043527, 2011

    Salvatore Capozziello, VF Cardone, H Farajollahi, and A Ravan- pak. Cosmography in f (t) gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(4):043527, 2011. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.84.043527

    2011

  24. [25]

    Paliathanasis, J

    Andronikos Paliathanasis, John D Barrow, and PGL Leach. Cosmolog- ical solutions of f (t) gravity.Physical Review D, 94(2):023525, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023525 2016

  25. [26]

    f (t) gravity after gw170817 and grb170817a.Physical Review D, 97(10): 103513, 2018

    Yi-Fu Cai, Chunlong Li, Emmanuel N Saridakis, and Ling-Qin Xue. f (t) gravity after gw170817 and grb170817a.Physical Review D, 97(10): 103513, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103513

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103513 2018

  26. [28]

    Tinto and J

    Tiberiu Harko, Francisco SN Lobo, Shin’ichi Nojiri, and Sergei D Odintsov. f (R, T) gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Grav- itation, and Cosmology, 84(2):024020, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 84.024020. 32

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2011

  27. [29]

    Cosmological and solar system consequences of f (r, t) gravity models.Physical Review D, 90(4): 044031, 2014

    Hamid Shabani and Mehrdad Farhoudi. Cosmological and solar system consequences of f (r, t) gravity models.Physical Review D, 90(4): 044031, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044031

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044031 2014

  28. [30]

    Dynamical analysis of self-gravitating stars in f (r, t) gravity.Astrophysics and space science, 354(2):471–479, 2014

    M Sharif and Z Yousaf. Dynamical analysis of self-gravitating stars in f (r, t) gravity.Astrophysics and space science, 354(2):471–479, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10509-014-2113-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-014-2113-6 2014

  29. [32]

    Gravastars inf(R, T) gravity.Physical Review D, 95 (12):124011, 2017

    Amit Das, Shounak Ghosh, BK Guha, Swapan Das, Farook Rahaman, and Saibal Ray. Gravastars inf(R, T) gravity.Physical Review D, 95 (12):124011, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.124011 2017

  30. [33]

    f(R, T) gravity

    Jos´ e Barrientos O and Guillermo F Rubilar. Comment on “f(R, T) gravity”.Physical Review D, 90(2):028501, 2014. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.028501

    2014

  31. [34]

    F. G. Alvarenga, M. J. S. Houndjo, A. V. Monwanou, and J. B. Chabi Orou. Testing some f(r,t) gravity models from energy conditions.Jour- nal of Modern Physics, 4(1):130–139, jan 2013. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013. 41019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.41019

    work page doi:10.4236/jmp.2013 2013

  32. [35]

    Analysis off(R, T) gravity models through energy conditions.The European Physical Journal Plus, 128(10):123, 2013

    M Sharif, S Rani, and R Myrzakulov. Analysis off(R, T) gravity models through energy conditions.The European Physical Journal Plus, 128(10):123, 2013. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2013-13123-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/i2013-13123-0 2013

  33. [36]

    Petreczky and J

    Sarah B Fisher and Eric D Carlson. Reexaminingf(R, T) gravity. Physical Review D, 100(6):064059, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100. 064059

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100 2019

  34. [37]

    Dynamics of scalar perturbations inf(R, T) gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology, 87(10):103526, 2013

    FG Alvarenga, A De La Cruz-Dombriz, MJS Houndjo, ME Rodrigues, and Diego S´ aez-G´ omez. Dynamics of scalar perturbations inf(R, T) gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology, 87(10):103526, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103526

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103526 2013

  35. [38]

    Strange stars inf(R, T) gravity.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle 33 Physics, 2018(03):044–044, 2018

    Debabrata Deb, Farook Rahaman, Saibal Ray, and BK Guha. Strange stars inf(R, T) gravity.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle 33 Physics, 2018(03):044–044, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 044

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 2018

  36. [39]

    Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity and its gen- eralizations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5266, 2012

    Ratbay Myrzakulov. Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity and its gen- eralizations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5266, 2012. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.5266

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1205.5266 2012

  37. [40]

    Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories.Symmetry, 13(10):1855, 2021

    Nurgissa Myrzakulov, Ratbay Myrzakulov, and Lucrezia Ravera. Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories.Symmetry, 13(10):1855, 2021

    2021

  38. [41]

    Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories: models, applications and theoretical developments

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories: models, applications and theoretical developments. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 64(4):95, 2025

    2025

  39. [42]

    Myrzakulov gravity in viel- bein formalism: A study in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1015:116903, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Myrzakulov gravity in viel- bein formalism: A study in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1015:116903, 2025

    2025

  40. [43]

    Toward the alleviation of the h 0 tension in myrza- kulov f (r, t) gravity.Universe, 11(8):252, 2025

    Mashael A Aljohani, Emad E Mahmoud, Koblandy Yerzhanov, and Almira Sergazina. Toward the alleviation of the h 0 tension in myrza- kulov f (r, t) gravity.Universe, 11(8):252, 2025

    2025

  41. [44]

    Viable constraints on some myrzakulov f (r, t, q, t) models to study baryon asymmetry.Chinese Journal of Physics, 84:471–485, 2023

    R Saleem and Aqsa Saleem. Viable constraints on some myrzakulov f (r, t, q, t) models to study baryon asymmetry.Chinese Journal of Physics, 84:471–485, 2023

    2023

  42. [45]

    Myrzakulov gravity in viel- bein formalism: A study in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1015:116903, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Myrzakulov gravity in viel- bein formalism: A study in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1015:116903, 2025. ISSN 0550-3213. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116903. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0550321325001129

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [46]

    Wald entropy in extended modified myrzakulov gravity theories.International Journal of Theo- retical Physics, 64(10):268, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Wald entropy in extended modified myrzakulov gravity theories.International Journal of Theo- retical Physics, 64(10):268, 2025

    2025

  44. [47]

    Bufalo, M

    Che-Yu Chen, Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez, and Pisin Chen. Black hole solutions in mimetic born-infeld gravity.The European Physi- cal Journal C, 78(1), January 2018. ISSN 1434-6052. doi: 10.1140/ 34 epjc/s10052-018-5556-z. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-018-5556-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2018

  45. [48]

    Metric-affine vector–tensor corre- spondence and implications in f (r, t, q, t, d) gravity.Physics of the Dark Universe, 37:101094, 2022

    Damianos Iosifidis, Ratbay Myrzakulov, Lucrezia Ravera, Gulmira Yer- galiyeva, and Koblandy Yerzhanov. Metric-affine vector–tensor corre- spondence and implications in f (r, t, q, t, d) gravity.Physics of the Dark Universe, 37:101094, 2022

    2022

  46. [49]

    Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories with gauss-bonnet and boundary term scalars.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05318, 2021

    T Myrzakul, K Yesmakhanova, N Myrzakulov, S Myrzakul, K Myrza- kulov, K Yerzhanov, R Myrzakulov, and G Nugmanova. Metric-affine myrzakulov gravity theories with gauss-bonnet and boundary term scalars.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05318, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [50]

    Cosmological reconstruc- tions in einstein–cartan–myrzakulov gravity with torsion and non- metricity in the weitzenb¨ ock geometrical sector.Nuclear Physics B, page 117060, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Cosmological reconstruc- tions in einstein–cartan–myrzakulov gravity with torsion and non- metricity in the weitzenb¨ ock geometrical sector.Nuclear Physics B, page 117060, 2025

    2025

  48. [51]

    Einstein–gauss–bonnet– myrzakulov gravity from r+ f (t, g): Numerical insights and torsion– gauss–bonnet dynamics in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1017:116966, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Einstein–gauss–bonnet– myrzakulov gravity from r+ f (t, g): Numerical insights and torsion– gauss–bonnet dynamics in weitzenb¨ ock spacetime.Nuclear Physics B, 1017:116966, 2025

    2025

  49. [52]

    Observational constraints on myrzakulov gravity.Physical Re- view D, 103(10):104013, 2021

    Fotios K Anagnostopoulos, Spyros Basilakos, and Emmanuel N Sari- dakis. Observational constraints on myrzakulov gravity.Physical Re- view D, 103(10):104013, 2021

    2021

  50. [53]

    Cosmological study in myrzakulov f (r, t) quasi-dilaton massive gravity.Astroparticle Physics, 165:103060, 2025

    Sobhan Kazempour and Amin Rezaei Akbarieh. Cosmological study in myrzakulov f (r, t) quasi-dilaton massive gravity.Astroparticle Physics, 165:103060, 2025

    2025

  51. [54]

    Dark matter constraints in myrzakulov f (r, t) gravity: a vielbein approach in weitzenb¨ ock space- time with observational data.Nuclear Physics B, page 117042, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Dark matter constraints in myrzakulov f (r, t) gravity: a vielbein approach in weitzenb¨ ock space- time with observational data.Nuclear Physics B, page 117042, 2025

    2025

  52. [55]

    Dynamical system analysis of myrzakulov gravity.Physical Review D, 106(10):103512, 2022

    G Papagiannopoulos, Spyros Basilakos, and Emmanuel N Saridakis. Dynamical system analysis of myrzakulov gravity.Physical Review D, 106(10):103512, 2022

    2022

  53. [56]

    Cosmological applications of f (r, t) gravity with 35 dynamical curvature and torsion.Physical Review D, 102(2):023525, 2020

    Emmanuel N Saridakis, Shynaray Myrzakul, Kairat Myrzakulov, and Koblandy Yerzhanov. Cosmological applications of f (r, t) gravity with 35 dynamical curvature and torsion.Physical Review D, 102(2):023525, 2020

    2020

  54. [57]

    Exact cosmology in myrzakulov gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02123, 2024

    Dinesh Chandra Maurya and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Exact cosmology in myrzakulov gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02123, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [58]

    Transit cosmological models in f (r, t) gravity theory.The European Physical Journal C, 84 (5):534, 2024

    Dinesh Chandra Maurya and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Transit cosmological models in f (r, t) gravity theory.The European Physical Journal C, 84 (5):534, 2024

    2024

  56. [59]

    Flrw cosmology in metric-affine f (r, q) gravity.Chinese Physics C, 48(12):125101, 2024

    Dinesh Chandra Maurya, K Yesmakhanova, R Myrzakulov, and G Nugmanova. Flrw cosmology in metric-affine f (r, q) gravity.Chinese Physics C, 48(12):125101, 2024

    2024

  57. [60]

    Metric-affine f (t, q) gravity: cosmological implications and constraints.Physica Scripta, 99(10):105014, 2024

    Dinesh Chandra Maurya, K Yesmakhanova, R Myrzakulov, and G Nugmanova. Metric-affine f (t, q) gravity: cosmological implications and constraints.Physica Scripta, 99(10):105014, 2024

    2024

  58. [61]

    Inflation in myrzakulov f (r, t) gravity: a comparative study in metric, symmetric teleparallel, and weitzenb¨ ock formalisms.Nuclear Physics B, page 117022, 2025

    Davood Momeni and Ratbay Myrzakulov. Inflation in myrzakulov f (r, t) gravity: a comparative study in metric, symmetric teleparallel, and weitzenb¨ ock formalisms.Nuclear Physics B, page 117022, 2025

    2025

  59. [62]

    Cor- respondence between myrzakulovf(r, q) gravity and tsallis cosmology

    Andreas Lymperis, Gulgassyl Nugmanova, and Almira Sergazina. Cor- respondence between myrzakulovf(r, q) gravity and tsallis cosmology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04462, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [63]

    The late-time dark matter distribution in mg-i formalism with thermo- dynamic analysis.Fortschritte der Physik, 74(1):e70069, 2026

    Shaily, Mohit Tyagi, Jainendra Kumar Singh, and Joao RL Santos. The late-time dark matter distribution in mg-i formalism with thermo- dynamic analysis.Fortschritte der Physik, 74(1):e70069, 2026

    2026

  61. [64]

    Laurent ¸iu Bubuianu, Sergiu I Vacaru, El¸ sen Veli Veliev, and Assel Zhamysheva. Dark energy and dark matter configurations for worm- holes and solitionic hierarchies of nonmetric ricci flows and f (r, t, q, t m) gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 84(2):211, 2024

    2024

  62. [65]

    Exploring hybrid scalar factor and ekpyrotic bouncing cosmology in f (q, r) gravity.High Energy Density Physics, 55:101188, 2025

    Aimen Rauf, Bander Almutairi, and AS Khan. Exploring hybrid scalar factor and ekpyrotic bouncing cosmology in f (q, r) gravity.High Energy Density Physics, 55:101188, 2025

    2025

  63. [66]

    Quintom-like transit uni- verse models in metric-affine myrzakulovf(r, t, q, t m) gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01770, 2025

    Dinesh Chandra Maurya and Harjit Kumar. Quintom-like transit uni- verse models in metric-affine myrzakulovf(r, t, q, t m) gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01770, 2025. 36

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [67]

    Non- singular bounce solutions in myrzakulovf(r, t) gravity, 2025

    Andreas Lymperis, Gulgassyl Nugmanova, and Almira Sergazina. Non- singular bounce solutions in myrzakulovf(r, t) gravity, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18524

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [68]

    Flrw cosmology with horava- lifshitz gravity: Impacts of equations of state.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56(7):2122–2139, 2017

    Abdel Tawfik and E Abou El Dahab. Flrw cosmology with horava- lifshitz gravity: Impacts of equations of state.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56(7):2122–2139, 2017

    2017

  66. [69]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen. Generalized chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy-matter unification.Phys. Rev. D, 66(4):043507, 2002

    2002

  67. [70]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen. Generalized chaplygin gas and cosmic microwave background radiation constraints.Phys. Rev. D, 67(6):063003, 2003

    2003

  68. [71]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen. Generalized chaplygin gas model: dark energy–dark matter unification and cmbr constraints. Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 35(11):2063–2069, 2003

    2063

  69. [72]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier. Chaplygin-like gas and branes in black hole bulks.Phys. Lett. B, 487(1-2):7–13, 2000

    2000

  70. [73]

    P. H. R. S. Moraes, G. Ribeiro, and R. A. C. Correa. A transition from a decelerated to an accelerated phase of the universe expansion from the simplest non-trivial polynomial function oftin thef(r, t) formalism.Astrophysics and Space Science, 361(7):227, jun 2016. ISSN 1572-946X. doi: 10.1007/s10509-016-2788-y. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10509-016-2788-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2788-y 2016

  71. [74]

    Can the chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?Physical Review D, 67(6):063509, 2003

    Vittorio Gorini, Alexander Kamenshchik, and Ugo Moschella. Can the chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?Physical Review D, 67(6):063509, 2003

    2003

  72. [75]

    A primer on energy conditions

    Erik Curiel. A primer on energy conditions. InTowards a theory of spacetime theories, pages 43–104. Springer, 2017

    2017

  73. [76]

    Energy conditions in modified gravity.Physics Letters B, 730:280–283, 2014

    Salvatore Capozziello, Francisco SN Lobo, and Jos´ e P Mimoso. Energy conditions in modified gravity.Physics Letters B, 730:280–283, 2014. 37

    2014

  74. [77]

    The effective speed of sound in cosmological perturbation the- ory

    Sanil Unnikrishnan. The effective speed of sound in cosmological per- turbation theory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07045, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [78]

    Theory of cosmological perturbations.Physics reports, 215 (5-6):203–333, 1992

    Viatcheslav F Mukhanov, Hume A Feldman, and Robert Hans Bran- denberger. Theory of cosmological perturbations.Physics reports, 215 (5-6):203–333, 1992

    1992

  76. [79]

    Hadronic equation of state and speed of sound in thermal and dense medium.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 29(27):1450152, 2014

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and H Magdy. Hadronic equation of state and speed of sound in thermal and dense medium.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 29(27):1450152, 2014

    2014

  77. [80]

    Hadronic equation of state and speed of sound in thermal and dense medium.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 29(27):1450152, 2014

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Hend Magdy. Hadronic equation of state and speed of sound in thermal and dense medium.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 29(27):1450152, 2014

    2014

  78. [81]

    Radau methods, 2015

    Ernst Hairer and Gerhard Wanner. Radau methods, 2015

    2015

  79. [82]

    Loop quantum cosmology gravita- tional baryogenesis.Europhysics Letters, 116(4):49001, 2016

    SD Odintsov and VK Oikonomou. Loop quantum cosmology gravita- tional baryogenesis.Europhysics Letters, 116(4):49001, 2016

    2016

  80. [83]

    Effective actions for loop quantum cosmology in fourth- order gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 81(11):975, 2021

    Marcello Miranda, Daniele Vernieri, Salvatore Capozziello, and Fran- cisco SN Lobo. Effective actions for loop quantum cosmology in fourth- order gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 81(11):975, 2021

    2021

Showing first 80 references.