arxiv: 2604.21522 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian accuracy

Andrea Geralico, Donato Bini, Thibault Damour

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords gravitational wavespost-Newtonian approximationbremsstrahlungscatteringquadrupole momenthyperbolic motionmemory effect

0 comments

The pith

The quadrupolar part of the gravitational waveform from two-mass scattering is calculated to 3.5 post-Newtonian accuracy in both time and frequency domains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the time-domain expression for the helicity-2 radiative quadrupole moment during the hyperbolic encounter of two masses at 3.5PN order. It uses the radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian parametrization of the motion to achieve this accuracy. The frequency-domain version is then derived up to the two-loop level, corresponding to higher-order contributions in the waveform. This allows explicit calculation of the nonlinear memory effect and verification against the soft limit of the waveform. Such calculations provide precise analytic templates for gravitational radiation from unbound orbits in general relativity.

Core claim

Using the multipolar post-Minkowskian formalism and the 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian representation of hyperbolic motion, the time-domain quadrupolar waveform is obtained at 3.5PN accuracy. Its frequency-domain counterpart is evaluated explicitly up to the two-loop level, providing O(G^4) contributions to the waveform, along with the nonlinear memory term verified in the soft limit. The one-loop truncation matches results from other methods after accounting for the dipolar supertranslation between frames.

What carries the argument

The 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian representation of the hyperbolic motion, which parametrizes the scattering trajectory including radiation reaction effects to compute the radiative quadrupole moment.

If this is right

The nonlinear memory contribution to the waveform is explicitly computed in the center-of-mass frame.
Consistency with the soft-limit of the waveform is verified.
The result provides O(G^3) contributions to the Fourier transform of the quadrupole moment.
The one-loop truncation aligns with corresponding results from other methods after frame adjustment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These expressions could serve as benchmarks for numerical modeling of gravitational wave emission in high-velocity two-body encounters.
Patterns in the expansion for unbound orbits might be compared to similar calculations for bound orbits to identify shared structures.
Higher-order extensions of the same method could test the convergence of the post-Newtonian series for scattering processes.

Load-bearing premise

The post-Newtonian expansion remains valid for the scattering dynamics without breakdowns at higher orders.

What would settle it

A mismatch between this analytic waveform and high-precision numerical simulations of hyperbolic two-body encounters at equivalent accuracy would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We study the quadrupolar part of the gravitational waveform $h_{ij}$ (encoded in the helicity-($-2)$ radiative quadrupole moment $U_2 = \frac{1}{2!} \bar m^{i} \bar m^{j } U_{i j} \in\frac{R}{4G} \bar m^{i} \bar m^{j } h_{i j}\equiv W $) emitted during the scattering of two masses. Working within the Multipolar Post-Minkowskian (MPM) formalism, we compute the time-domain value of $U_2$ at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian (3.5PN) accuracy by using the 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian representation of the hyperbolic motion. We then explicitly evaluate the {\it frequency-domain} value of $U_2$ up to the 2-loop level, i.e. $ O(G^4)$ contributions to $h_{ij}(\omega, \theta,\phi)$, corresponding to $O(G^3)$ contributions to $\hat U_2(\omega, \theta,\phi)$. The nonlinear memory contribution to the waveform in the center-of-mass frame is computed too, and checked against the soft-limit of the waveform. The 1-loop truncation of our 3.5PN frequency-domain MPM waveform is found to agree with corresponding existing Effective Field Theory (EFT) results when subtracting the dipolar part of the Veneziano-Vilkovisky supertranslation connecting the MPM and EFT Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (BMS) frames.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper delivers a clean 3.5PN MPM computation of the quadrupolar waveform for hyperbolic scattering, with explicit frequency-domain results and EFT consistency checks after frame adjustment.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that Bini, Damour, and Geralico have extended the MPM formalism to give the time-domain quadrupolar moment U_2 at 3.5PN for two-body scattering and then evaluated the frequency-domain version up to two loops, including the nonlinear memory term. They check the memory against the soft limit and show that the 1-loop truncation matches existing EFT results once the dipolar part of the Veneziano-Vilkovisky supertranslation is subtracted to align the BMS frames. That agreement is useful because it bridges two different approaches without introducing free parameters or fits. The work stays strictly analytic and uses the standard radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian parametrization of the hyperbolic orbit as input. The derivation follows the established MPM machinery, and the soft-limit and EFT cross-checks provide independent support for the central expressions. The soft spot is the reliance on that 3.5PN quasi-Keplerian trajectory. The paper inserts it directly into the waveform formula but does not supply an independent cross-check of the trajectory coefficients against the equations of motion at the same order. If radiation-reaction corrections to the asymptotic velocities or time parametrization are incomplete, they could propagate into U_2 at the claimed accuracy. This is a standard assumption in the field rather than a new gap, and the memory and soft-limit verifications still hold, so it does not undermine the main results. The paper is aimed at researchers who need high-order analytic waveforms for scattering or hyperbolic encounters in gravitational-wave data analysis and in tests of general relativity. Anyone working on matching MPM to EFT calculations will also find the frame-adjustment discussion relevant. It deserves a serious referee because the computation fills a concrete gap at high PN order for non-circular motion and includes verifiable consistency checks. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes the quadrupolar component of the gravitational waveform (encoded in the radiative quadrupole moment U_2) for two-body hyperbolic scattering at 3.5PN accuracy in the time domain within the multipolar post-Minkowskian (MPM) formalism, employing a radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian parametrization of the motion. It then evaluates the frequency-domain waveform up to O(G^4) (two-loop level), computes the nonlinear memory contribution in the center-of-mass frame, verifies consistency with the soft limit, and shows agreement of the 1-loop truncation with existing EFT results after subtracting the dipolar part of the Veneziano-Vilkovisky supertranslation between MPM and EFT BMS frames.

Significance. If the central derivation is valid, this provides a high-precision analytic waveform for hyperbolic encounters, which are of increasing interest for gravitational-wave astronomy. The explicit two-loop frequency-domain result, the memory/soft-limit cross-check, and the EFT agreement after frame adjustment are concrete strengths that enhance the utility of both MPM and EFT methods for scattering observables.

major comments (1)

The central claim for the 3.5PN time-domain U_2 (and all subsequent frequency-domain and memory results) rests on inserting the 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian hyperbolic trajectory into the MPM waveform formula. The manuscript states that this representation is used but does not supply an independent cross-check that all required 3.5PN corrections—including radiation-reaction modifications to the asymptotic velocities and the time parametrization—are present without secular artifacts or omissions. This validation is load-bearing for the accuracy claim; its absence leaves open the possibility that the trajectory parametrization misses terms that propagate into U_2 at the stated order.

minor comments (1)

The notation relating U_2 to the strain h_ij and to the helicity component W is introduced in the abstract but would benefit from an explicit equation in the main text for clarity when readers compare with other MPM or EFT literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our results and for the detailed comment on the validation of the trajectory parametrization. We address the concern below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested cross-checks and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim for the 3.5PN time-domain U_2 (and all subsequent frequency-domain and memory results) rests on inserting the 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian hyperbolic trajectory into the MPM waveform formula. The manuscript states that this representation is used but does not supply an independent cross-check that all required 3.5PN corrections—including radiation-reaction modifications to the asymptotic velocities and the time parametrization—are present without secular artifacts or omissions. This validation is load-bearing for the accuracy claim; its absence leaves open the possibility that the trajectory parametrization misses terms that propagate into U_2 at the stated order.

Authors: We agree that an explicit validation of the 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian parametrization strengthens the central claim. The trajectory is taken from the standard 3.5PN hyperbolic solution derived in the literature (specifically, the radiation-reaction corrected quasi-Keplerian parametrization of Blanchet, Faye, and collaborators, which incorporates the 3.5PN dissipative terms, asymptotic velocity shifts, and time reparametrization designed to remove secular growth). In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in Section II that (i) lists the explicit 3.5PN corrections to the semi-latus rectum, eccentricity, and mean anomaly, (ii) recalls the absence of secular terms by construction in the radiation-reaction gauge, and (iii) verifies that the leading 1PN and 2PN truncations of our U_2 reproduce the known lower-order MPM results. These steps constitute an independent consistency check internal to the MPM framework and confirm that no omitted radiation-reaction contributions propagate into U_2 at 3.5PN order. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard MPM inputs and EFT cross-checks keep derivation independent

full rationale

The derivation inserts the established 3.5PN radiation-reacted quasi-Keplerian hyperbolic trajectory (a prior literature result) into the MPM waveform formula to obtain time-domain U_2, then performs explicit frequency-domain evaluation up to O(G^4) and memory/soft-limit checks. The 1-loop truncation agrees with independent EFT results after BMS frame adjustment. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the central computation builds on external benchmarks rather than re-deriving its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Relies on established general relativity formalisms without new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Validity of the multipolar post-Minkowskian formalism for computing radiative moments
Standard framework invoked for waveform computation in the abstract.
domain assumption Quasi-Keplerian representation of hyperbolic motion at 3.5PN order
Used to represent the scattering trajectory in the time-domain calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1249 out tokens · 44326 ms · 2026-05-09T21:22:20.758996+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).
Gravitational waveform from radial infall at the third-and-half Post-Newtonian order
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Gravitational waveform from radial infall of a particle into a Schwarzschild black hole computed to 3.5 post-Newtonian order.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

(A19) forl= 2 Iij = FP B=0 Z d3xerB ˆxij r1r2 =− 2π 3 r12(ˆyij 1 +y ⟨i 1 yj⟩ 2 + ˆyij 2 ),(A20) 21 and forl= 3 Iijk = FP B=0 Z d3xerB ˆxijk r1r2 =− π 2 r12(ˆyijk 1 +y ⟨ij 1 yk⟩ 2 +y ⟨i 1 yjk⟩ 2 + ˆyijk 2 ).(A21) Several identities are easily derived. For example, ∂ ∂y i 1 1 r1 = ni 1 r2 1 =− ∂ ∂xi 1 r1 .(A22) Similarly, for forr 12 =|y 1 −y 2|we find ∂ ∂y...
[2]

Proceeding in successive steps, one needs to compute (at the Newtonian order level) the expressions of∂ tV, ∂iV,∂ iV ∂jV,∂ iVk −∂ kVi

=− 1 r12 P(n 12)ij , (A24) whereP(n 12)ij projects orthogonally ton i 12. Proceeding in successive steps, one needs to compute (at the Newtonian order level) the expressions of∂ tV, ∂iV,∂ iV ∂jV,∂ iVk −∂ kVi. For their non singular parts (denoted below by the symbol∼) we find ∂tV= Gm1 r2 1 (n1 ·v 1) + Gm2 r2 2 (n2 ·v 2) ∂iV=− Gm1 r2 1 ni 1 − Gm2 r2 2 ni 2...
[3]

Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravita- tional Waves,

L. Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravita- tional Waves,” Living Rev.Rel. 27 (2024) 1, 4; doi:10.1007/s41114-024-00050-z [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr- qc]]

work page doi:10.1007/s41114-024-00050-z 2024
[4]

The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,

R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,” Phys. Rept.633, 1-104 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003 [arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003 2016
[5]

The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes.J

G. Travaglini, A. Brandhuber, P. Dorey, T. McLough- lin, S. Abreu, Z. Bern, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, 27 TABLE V: The various nonzero multipolar coefficients ofE cmvk lm in an expansion in powers ofv= p∞√ 1+p2∞ , evaluated forl= 3 and allmcorresponding to nonzero values. Ecmv2 33 79 288 ip π 35 √1−4ν Ecmv2 31 653 240 ip π 21 √1−4ν Ecmv4 33 ip π 35 √1−4ν 2204...

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac8380 2022
[6]

Buonanno, M

A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Snowmass White Pa- per: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes,” [arXiv:2204.05194 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[7]

Brunello, S

G. Brunello, S. De Angelis and D. A. Kosower, “Ana- lytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativ- ity,” [arXiv:2511.05412 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[8]

Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,

L. Barack and A. Pound, “Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, no.1, 016904 (2019) doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae552 [arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae552 2019
[9]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006 , eid =

A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one- body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006 [arXiv:gr-qc/9811091 [gr-qc]]. 28 TABLE VII: The various nonzero multipolar coefficients ofE cmvk lm in an expansion in powers ofv= p∞√ 1+p2∞ , evaluated forl= 5 and allmcorresponding to nonzero ...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.084006 1999
[10]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064015 , eid =

A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D62, 064015 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064015 [arXiv:gr-qc/0001013 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.064015 2000
[11]

Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,

D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.2, 024061 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024061 [arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.024061 2020
[12]

The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: from source to canonical moment,

L. Blanchet, G. Faye and F. Larrouturou, “The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: from source to canonical moment,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, no.19, 195003 (2022) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac840c [arXiv:2204.11293 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac840c 2022
[13]

Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircu- lar Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post-Newtonian Order,

L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini, “Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircu- lar Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post-Newtonian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, no.12, 121402 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.121402 [arXiv:2304.11185 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.121402 2023
[14]

Phys Rev D 108(6):064041

L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini, “Gravitational-wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircular nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.6, 064041 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064041 [arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.064041 2023
[15]

Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,

D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 125008 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.125008 [arXiv:2402.06604 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.125008 2024
[16]

Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,

D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 064035 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064035 [arXiv:2407.02076 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.064035 2024
[17]

Compar- ing one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung ampli- tudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian wave- form,

D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Compar- ing one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung ampli- tudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian wave- form,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124052 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124052 [arXiv:2309.14925 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124052 2023
[18]

PostNewtonian generation of gravitational waves. 2. The Spin moments,

T. Damour and B. R. Iyer, “PostNewtonian generation of gravitational waves. 2. The Spin moments,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.54, 115-164 (1991) IHES-P-90-85

1991
[19]

On the multipole expansion of the gravitational field,

L. Blanchet, “On the multipole expansion of the gravitational field,” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 1971- 1999 (1998) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/7/013 [arXiv:gr- qc/9801101 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/7/013 1971
[20]

PostNewtonian approx- imation for isolated systems calculated by matched asymptotic expansions,

O. Poujade and L. Blanchet, “PostNewtonian approx- imation for isolated systems calculated by matched asymptotic expansions,” Phys. Rev. D65, 124020 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.124020 [arXiv:gr-qc/0112057 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.124020 2002
[21]

Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379-430 (1986) doi:10.1098/rsta.1986.0125

work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1986.0125 1986
[22]

Postnewtonian Generation of Gravitational Waves,

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Postnewtonian Generation of Gravitational Waves,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.50, 377-408 (1989)

1989
[23]

The Gen- eration of Gravitational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formulas,

S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Gen- eration of Gravitational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formulas,” Astrophys. J.217, 252-280 (1977) doi:10.1086/155576

work page doi:10.1086/155576 1977
[24]

S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Generation of Grav- 29 TABLE VIII: The various nonzero multipolar coefficients ofE cmvk lm in an expansion in powers ofv= p∞√ 1+p2∞ , evaluated for l= 6 and allmcorresponding to nonzero values. Ecmv3 66 q 7π 429 475 1024 − 25ν 16 Ecmv3 64 q 7π 26 27 2816 − 3ν 88 Ecmv3 62 q 3π 455 189ν 176 − 3627 11264 Ecmv3 60 p π 13 59...

work page doi:10.1086/156350 1978
[25]

Classical gravitational bremsstrahlung from a worldline quantum field theory,

G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a World- line Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.20, 201103 (2021) [arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Mougiakakos, M

S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi, “Gravi- tational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effec- tive field theory,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 024041 (2021) [arXiv:2102.08339 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,

A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De An- gelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,” JHEP06, 048 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)048 [arXiv:2303.06111 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)048 2023
[28]

The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,

A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,” JHEP06, 004 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)004 [arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)004 2023
[29]

In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scat- tering at one loop,

A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm, “In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scat- tering at one loop,” JHEP2023, no.06, 126 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)126 [arXiv:2303.07006 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)126 2023
[30]

An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravita- tional scattering waveform,

A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, “An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravita- tional scattering waveform,” JHEP03, 089 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)089 [arXiv:2312.07452 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)089 2024
[31]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064035 , eid =

K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer and M. S. S. Qu- sailah, “Inspiralling compact binaries in quasi-elliptical orbits: The Complete 3PN energy flux,” Phys. Rev. D77, 064035 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064035 [arXiv:0711.0302 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.064035 2008
[32]

Third post-Newtonian gravitational waveforms for compact binary systems in general orbits: Instantaneous terms,

C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun and B. R. Iyer, “Third post-Newtonian gravitational waveforms for compact binary systems in general orbits: Instantaneous terms,” Phys. Rev. D91, no.8, 084040 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084040 [arXiv:1501.07096 [gr- qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.084040 2015
[33]

Blanchet, G

L. Blanchet, G. Faye, E. Seraille and D. Trestini, “Gravi- tational radiation reaction for compact binary systems at the fourth-and-a-half post-Newtonian order in harmonic coordinates,” [arXiv:2601.06743 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[34]

doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175004 , eid =

G. Faye, S. Marsat, L. Blanchet and B. R. Iyer, “The third and a half post-Newtonian gravita- tional wave quadrupole mode for quasi-circular in- spiralling compact binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 175004 (2012) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175004 30 [arXiv:1204.1043 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175004 2012
[35]

Non-linear multipole interactions and gravitational-wave octupole modes for inspiralling compact binaries to third-and- a-half post-Newtonian order,

G. Faye, L. Blanchet and B. R. Iyer, “Non-linear multipole interactions and gravitational-wave octupole modes for inspiralling compact binaries to third-and- a-half post-Newtonian order,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, no.4, 045016 (2015) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/4/045016 [arXiv:1409.3546 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/4/045016 2015
[36]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124015 , eid =

W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, “Gravitational radia- tive corrections from effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D81, 124015 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124015 [arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.124015 2010
[37]

Gravitational wave tails of tails,

L. Blanchet, “Gravitational wave tails of tails,” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 113-141 (1998) [erratum: Class. Quant. Grav.22, 3381 (2005)] doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/1/009 [arXiv:gr-qc/9710038 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/1/009 1998
[38]

Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,

D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.2, 024012 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024012 [arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.024012 2023
[39]

Grav- itational waves from compact binaries in post-Newtonian accurate hyperbolic orbits,

G. Cho, A. Gopakumar, M. Haney and H. M. Lee, “Grav- itational waves from compact binaries in post-Newtonian accurate hyperbolic orbits,” Phys. Rev. D98, no. 2, 024039 (2018) [arXiv:1807.02380 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2018
[40]

Radiation- reaction correction to scattering binary dynamics at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order,

D. Bini, A. Geralico and S. Rufrano Aliberti, “Radiation- reaction correction to scattering binary dynamics at the next-to-leading post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.10, 104005 (2025) doi:10.1103/ggbn-fw7j [arXiv:2509.17853 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/ggbn-fw7j 2025
[41]

Iterated Bessel Function

Ancillary file. It contains the complete results forU 2 up toO(G 3η7) as well as all the “Iterated Bessel Function” master integrals needed for their explicit evaluation
[42]

Heissenberg and R

C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, “Reconstructing the Gravitational Waveform from Its Probe Limit,” [arXiv:2511.13835 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[43]

Higher-order tail contribu- tions to the energy and angular momentum fluxes in a two-body scattering process,

D. Bini and A. Geralico, “Higher-order tail contribu- tions to the energy and angular momentum fluxes in a two-body scattering process,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.10, 104020 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104020 [arXiv:2108.05445 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.104020 2021
[44]

Rel.6 6 [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120]

M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2003
[45]

Ana- lytic solutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post-Minkowskian expansion,

S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,” Prog. Theor. Phys.96, 549 (1996) [gr-qc/9605057]

work page arXiv 1996
[46]

Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 1079 (1996) [gr- qc/9603020]

work page arXiv 1996
[47]

High post-Minkowskian gravitational wave- form for hyperbolic encounters in the extreme-mass-ratio limit,

A. Geralico, “High post-Minkowskian gravitational wave- form for hyperbolic encounters in the extreme-mass-ratio limit,” [arXiv:2603.11774 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[48]

Fujita and B

R. Fujita and B. R. Iyer, “Spherical harmonic modes of 5.5 post-Newtonian gravitational wave polarisa- tions and associated factorised resummed waveforms for a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D82, 044051 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044051 [arXiv:1005.2266 [gr- qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.044051 2010
[49]

Weinberg, Phys

S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravi- tons,” Phys. Rev.140, B516-B524 (1965) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.B516

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.b516 1965
[50]

Proof of the clas- sical soft graviton theorem inD= 4,

A. P. Saha, B. Sahoo and A. Sen, “Proof of the clas- sical soft graviton theorem inD= 4,” JHEP06, 153 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)153 [arXiv:1912.06413 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)153 2020
[51]

Classical soft gravi- ton theorem rewritten,

B. Sahoo and A. Sen, “Classical soft gravi- ton theorem rewritten,” JHEP01, 077 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)077 [arXiv:2105.08739 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)077 2022
[52]

Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Hereditary effects in grav- itational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D46, 4304-4319 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4304

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.4304 1992
[53]

Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation

A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will, “Christodoulou’s non- linear gravitational wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,” Phys. Rev. D44, no.10, R2945-R2949 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.R2945

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.r2945 1991
[54]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002 , eid =

M. Favata, “Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, in- spiralling compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D80, 024002 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002 [arXiv:0812.0069 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.024002 2009
[55]

Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,

D. Christodoulou, “Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1486-1489 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1486 1991
[56]

Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,

K. S. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,” Phys. Rev. D45, no.2, 520- 524 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.520

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.520 1992
[57]

Nonlinear Gravitational Mem- ory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg and J. Parra-Martinez, “Nonlinear Gravitational Mem- ory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, no.12, 121401 (2026) doi:10.1103/8m17-s2y8 [arXiv:2506.20733 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/8m17-s2y8 2026
[58]

Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at (O(G 3)): quadratic-in-spin effects,

L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at (O(G 3)): quadratic-in-spin effects,” JHEP12, 100 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)100 [arXiv:2505.15724 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)100 2025
[59]

Angular momen- tum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reac- tion, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity,

G. Veneziano and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Angular momen- tum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reac- tion, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity,” Phys. Lett. B 834, 137419 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137419 [arXiv:2201.11607 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137419 2022
[60]

Energy losses by gravitational radia- tion in inspiraling compact binaries to five halves postNewtonian order,

L. Blanchet, “Energy losses by gravitational radia- tion in inspiraling compact binaries to five halves postNewtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D54, 1417-1438 (1996) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D71, 129904 (2005)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.129904 [arXiv:gr-qc/9603048 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.129904 1996
[61]

Gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries: Energy loss and wave form to second post-Newtonian order,

L. Blanchet, T. Damour and B. R. Iyer, “Gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries: Energy loss and wave form to second post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D51, 5360 (1995) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D54, 1860 (1996)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5360 [arXiv:gr- qc/9501029 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.5360 1995
[62]

Second postNewtonian generation of gravitational radiation,

L. Blanchet, “Second postNewtonian generation of gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D51, 2559- 2583 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2559 [arXiv:gr- qc/9501030 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.2559 1995
[63]

Phys Rev D 85:124034

D. Bini, T. Damour and G. Faye, “Effective ac- tion approach to higher-order relativistic tidal in- teractions in binary systems and their effective one body description,” Phys. Rev. D85, 124034 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124034 [arXiv:1202.3565 [gr- qc]]. 31

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.124034 2012
[64]

Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,

E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,” JHEP10, 148 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)148 [arXiv:2104.03957 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)148 2021
[65]

Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,

D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, 084031 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084031 [arXiv:2107.08896 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084031 2021
[66]

Fourth post-Minkowskian local-in-time conservative dynamics of binary sys- tems,

D. Bini and T. Damour, “Fourth post-Minkowskian local-in-time conservative dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 064005 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064005 [arXiv:2406.04878 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.064005 2024
[67]

Whiler 0 enters theU ij[Mij] link as an ultraviolet cutoff, it enters the PN-expanded integral expression ofI ij as an infrared cutoff
[68]

These relations are PM-exact and do not containG