pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21535 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Fermion Condensate Inflation, Dynamical Waterfall Mechanism and Primordial Black Holes

Antonino Marciano, Jinglong Liu, Misao Sasaki, Pisin Chen, Stephon Alexander, Xuan-Lin Su

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords fermion condensatespacetime torsionhybrid inflationwaterfall mechanismprimordial black holesQ-ballsChern-Simons gravityparity violation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inflation arises from four-fermion interactions induced by spacetime torsion, using only Standard Model fields and forming primordial black holes through a dynamical waterfall.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a condensate of fermions can drive inflation through torsion-generated four-fermion couplings, avoiding any extra scalar fields. Decomposing the fermion into two sectors and integrating them out produces effective bound states that act as the inflaton and auxiliary field in a hybrid inflation setup. An axial chemical potential supplies a natural end to inflation, triggers instant preheating, and allows Q-balls to form in the waterfall phase as seeds for primordial black holes. The construction ties directly to Chern-Simons gravity, so the universe is predicted to be parity-violating, with both black-hole abundance and parity signals available as tests.

Core claim

Fermion condensate inflation emerges from four-fermion interactions induced by spacetime torsion without additional scalar fields. The fermion decomposes into two sectors whose bound states, after integration, serve as the inflaton and auxiliary fields of hybrid inflation with a dynamical waterfall. An axial chemical potential ends inflation naturally and initiates instant preheating, while the waterfall potential supports Q-ball formation that seeds primordial black holes. The framework links to Chern-Simons gravity and therefore predicts a parity-violating universe whose signatures can be checked through PBH dark-matter abundance and parity-violating observables.

What carries the argument

Effective potential from integrating out two fermion sectors, with axial chemical potential supplying the dynamical termination and Q-ball formation.

If this is right

  • Inflation requires no scalar fields beyond the Standard Model.
  • Inflation ends through a waterfall that produces instant preheating.
  • Q-balls form during the waterfall and act as seeds for primordial black holes.
  • The model connects to Chern-Simons gravity and therefore predicts observable parity violation.
  • PBH dark-matter abundance and parity-violation signals both serve as direct observational tests.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fermions correspond to known Standard Model species, collider searches could constrain the torsion scale independently of cosmology.
  • Parity violation would imprint a specific handedness pattern on CMB polarization that could be separated from other sources.
  • The Q-ball mass distribution might produce a PBH population distinguishable from astrophysical black holes by future gravitational-wave observatories.
  • Torsion effects could alter other early-universe processes such as phase transitions or baryogenesis.

Load-bearing premise

Decomposing the fermion into two sectors and integrating them out produces bound states that precisely reproduce the hybrid-inflation potential and waterfall dynamics without extra tuning.

What would settle it

Absence of the predicted parity-violating signatures in the cosmic microwave background or gravitational-wave background, or a PBH mass spectrum and abundance inconsistent with Q-ball formation in the waterfall phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21535 by Antonino Marciano, Jinglong Liu, Misao Sasaki, Pisin Chen, Stephon Alexander, Xuan-Lin Su.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: We plot the normalized effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The magnitude of the right-hand side of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: We plot the values of the second derivative of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fermion condensate inflation, where inflation emerges from four-fermion interactions induced by spacetime torsion, removes the need for additional scalar fields beyond the Standard Model. In this framework, the fermion field can be decomposed into two distinguished sectors, each giving rise to bound states. After integrating out fermions, the bound fields play the roles of the inflaton and the auxiliary fields, resembling hybrid inflation with a waterfall mechanism. The inclusion of an axial chemical potential naturally introduces a mechanism to end inflation and trigger instant preheating. During the waterfall phase, the effective potential of the fermion condensate supports the formation of non-topological solitons such as Q-balls, which act as seeds of primordial black holes. This model is intrinsically connected to Chern-Simons gravity, which implies a parity-violating universe. Consequently, both the primordial black hole (PBH) dark-matter abundance and parity-violation signatures could provide observational tests of the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes fermion condensate inflation arising from torsion-induced four-fermion interactions in a Chern-Simons gravity framework. The fermion field is decomposed into two sectors whose bound states, after integration, are claimed to serve as the inflaton and waterfall auxiliary fields, reproducing a hybrid inflation potential with a dynamical waterfall. An axial chemical potential terminates inflation, triggers instant preheating, and enables Q-ball formation that seeds primordial black holes. The model predicts observable PBH dark-matter abundance and parity-violation signatures without introducing scalar fields beyond the Standard Model.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the result would be significant: it realizes inflation and a waterfall mechanism using only Standard Model fermions plus torsion, supplies a dynamical end to inflation via the axial chemical potential, and links PBH production to parity-violating gravity. This would offer a concrete, potentially testable alternative to scalar-driven hybrid inflation while making falsifiable predictions for PBH abundance and parity-violating observables.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model construction] Abstract and central construction: the assertion that a decomposition of the single fermion field into two distinguished sectors, followed by integration, yields bound-state fields whose effective potential exactly reproduces the hybrid-inflation form (inflaton plus waterfall auxiliary) is load-bearing for the 'no additional scalar fields' claim. No explicit Lagrangian, torsion-induced four-fermion vertex, or integration steps are supplied to demonstrate that the resulting potential parameters are fixed by the torsion scale rather than chosen by hand; without this, the resemblance to hybrid inflation and the Q-ball/PBH seeding mechanism remain unverified.
  2. [Inflation termination and preheating] Inflation termination: the axial chemical potential is introduced specifically to end inflation and trigger preheating. Its value appears selected to produce the desired waterfall dynamics rather than derived from the torsion scale or fermion couplings, which would make the termination mechanism a fitted parameter by construction and undermine the naturalness of the end-of-inflation mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Add explicit equation numbers for the effective potential, the axial chemical potential term, and the Q-ball formation condition, and reference them consistently in the text.
  2. [References] Expand the reference list to include standard hybrid-inflation literature and prior work on torsion-induced four-fermion interactions to clarify the novelty of the decomposition step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, the positive assessment of the work's potential significance, and the recommendation for major revision. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that strengthen the derivations without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and model construction] Abstract and central construction: the assertion that a decomposition of the single fermion field into two distinguished sectors, followed by integration, yields bound-state fields whose effective potential exactly reproduces the hybrid-inflation form (inflaton plus waterfall auxiliary) is load-bearing for the 'no additional scalar fields' claim. No explicit Lagrangian, torsion-induced four-fermion vertex, or integration steps are supplied to demonstrate that the resulting potential parameters are fixed by the torsion scale rather than chosen by hand; without this, the resemblance to hybrid inflation and the Q-ball/PBH seeding mechanism remain unverified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the central construction. The manuscript sketches the torsion-induced four-fermion interaction, the decomposition into two fermion sectors, and the subsequent integration leading to the effective hybrid potential (see Sections 2 and 3). However, we agree that the integration steps and the demonstration that all parameters are fixed by the torsion scale (rather than introduced by hand) should be presented more transparently to fully support the no-additional-scalars claim and the Q-ball/PBH mechanism. In the revised manuscript we will insert the explicit Lagrangian, the four-fermion vertex, the decomposition procedure, and the key integration steps (including how the hybrid form and its parameters emerge directly from the torsion coupling), together with a short appendix summarizing the calculation. This will make the resemblance to hybrid inflation and the subsequent dynamics fully verifiable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Inflation termination and preheating] Inflation termination: the axial chemical potential is introduced specifically to end inflation and trigger preheating. Its value appears selected to produce the desired waterfall dynamics rather than derived from the torsion scale or fermion couplings, which would make the termination mechanism a fitted parameter by construction and undermine the naturalness of the end-of-inflation mechanism.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding naturalness. The axial chemical potential is not an independent fitted parameter; it arises from the parity-violating Chern-Simons term coupled to the torsion-induced fermion condensate, and its magnitude is fixed by the underlying fermion couplings and the torsion scale (Section 4). Nevertheless, the current presentation may not make this derivation sufficiently explicit. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection that derives the chemical-potential value step by step from the torsion scale and the effective four-fermion couplings, showing that it is determined by the requirement of dynamical waterfall termination rather than chosen to fit the desired outcome. This will strengthen the claim that inflation ends naturally within the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Decomposition into two fermion sectors and axial chemical potential chosen to reproduce hybrid inflation and its termination by construction

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "In this framework, the fermion field can be decomposed into two distinguished sectors, each giving rise to bound states. After integrating out fermions, the bound fields play the roles of the inflaton and the auxiliary fields, resembling hybrid inflation with a waterfall mechanism."

    The decomposition into 'two distinguished sectors' is stipulated such that integration produces bound states whose effective potential exactly matches the inflaton + waterfall auxiliary of hybrid inflation. The resemblance is therefore true by the choice of decomposition rather than derived from the underlying torsion-induced four-fermion Lagrangian.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The inclusion of an axial chemical potential naturally introduces a mechanism to end inflation and trigger instant preheating."

    The axial chemical potential is added specifically to supply the termination of inflation and preheating trigger. Its value and role are not shown to be fixed by the torsion scale or fermion couplings; instead it is introduced to produce the desired end to inflation, rendering the 'natural' termination a modeling input by construction.

full rationale

The central claim—that torsion-induced four-fermion interactions yield inflation without extra scalars, via bound states mimicking hybrid inflation with a natural waterfall end—is load-bearing on two steps that reduce to the paper's own modeling choices. The fermion decomposition is defined to produce the exact inflaton + auxiliary structure, and the axial chemical potential is introduced to terminate inflation. Both are presented as emerging naturally but function as fitted inputs that force the resemblance and termination. No independent derivation from the torsion scale is shown that would fix these without the target hybrid form. This yields partial circularity (score 6) while leaving room for the torsion-Chern-Simons connection to be independently testable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the torsion-induced four-fermion interaction, the two-sector decomposition of the fermion field, and the emergence of an effective hybrid potential after integration; these steps introduce several domain assumptions and one ad-hoc decomposition whose validity is not independently verified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • axial chemical potential
    Introduced to terminate inflation and initiate preheating; its magnitude must be chosen to match the desired waterfall dynamics.
  • four-fermion coupling scale
    Sets the energy scale of the condensate and inflation; expected to be fitted to CMB observables.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spacetime torsion generates effective four-fermion interactions among fermions
    This is the foundational premise that allows the condensate to form without new fields.
  • ad hoc to paper The fermion field admits a decomposition into two sectors whose bound states behave as inflaton and auxiliary fields
    This step is required to reproduce the hybrid-inflation structure after integrating out the fermions.
invented entities (1)
  • Q-balls formed from the fermion condensate during the waterfall no independent evidence
    purpose: Non-topological solitons that collapse into primordial black holes
    The effective potential is stated to support their formation, but no independent evidence or mass prediction is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1766 out tokens · 47332 ms · 2026-05-09T21:40:36.387290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Differentiating Eq

    The Gap Equation The physical mass gapAis determined by the minimum of the total effective potential, which satisfies the gap equation∂V total/∂A= 0. Differentiating Eq. (C17) with respect toAbefore performing the energy integration drastically simplifies the algebraic structure: ∂Vflat ∂A = A λ − 1 4π3 Z Λ 0 |⃗ q|2d|⃗ q| 18 × Z Wq −Wq dω 2A ω2 +E 2 + + 2...

  2. [2]

    It governs the asymmetry between the left- handed and right-handed fermion populations

    Axial Number Density The conjugate thermodynamic variable to the chiral chemical potentialµis the axial number density,n A = ⟨ ¯ψγ0γ5ψ⟩. It governs the asymmetry between the left- handed and right-handed fermion populations. Using the thermodynamic relationn A =−∂V total/∂µand operating under the decoupling approximation (where ∂V1/∂µ≈0), we obtain: nA = ...

  3. [3]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  4. [4]

    Linde, Physics Letters B129, 177 (1983)

    A. Linde, Physics Letters B129, 177 (1983)

    1983

  5. [5]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  6. [6]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    work page arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2491 (1990)

    1990

  9. [9]

    Farhi, N

    E. Farhi, N. Graham, A. H. Guth, N. Iqbal, R. R. Ros- ales, and N. Stamatopoulos, Phys. Rev. D77, 085019 (2008), arXiv:0712.3034 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. D61, 041301 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9909509

    work page arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    S. R. Coleman, Nucl. Phys. B262, 263 (1985), [Adden- dum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)]

    1985

  12. [12]

    Kusenko, Physics Letters B404, 285 (1997)

    A. Kusenko, Physics Letters B404, 285 (1997)

    1997

  13. [13]

    Shaposhnikov

    A. Kusenko and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B418, 46 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9709492

    work page arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Kusenko, L

    A. Kusenko, L. C. Loveridge, and M. Shaposhnikov, JCAP08, 011, arXiv:astro-ph/0507225

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. D94, 123006 (2016), arXiv:1609.00970 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 031103 (2017), arXiv:1612.02529 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. D96, 103002 (2017), arXiv:1706.09003 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki, and V. Takhistov, JCAP10, 077, arXiv:1907.10613 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1907

  19. [19]

    Enqvist and J

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald, Nucl. Phys. B538, 321 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9803380

    work page arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. D64, 123515 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106119

    work page arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Kasuya and M

    S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. D89, 103534 (2014), arXiv:1402.4546 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Kusenko, Phys

    A. Kusenko, Phys. Lett. B405, 108 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9704273

    work page arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    Enqvist and J

    K. Enqvist and J. McDonald, Phys. Lett. B440, 59 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9807269

    work page arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    Enqvist and A

    K. Enqvist and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rept.380, 99 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0209244

    work page arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    Kusenko, V

    A. Kusenko, V. Kuzmin, M. E. Shaposhnikov, and P. G. Tinyakov, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3185 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9712212

    work page arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, Sov. Astron.10, 602 (1967)

    1967

  27. [27]

    Hawking, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society152, 75 (1971)

    S. Hawking, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society152, 75 (1971)

    1971

  28. [28]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society168, 399 (1974)

    1974

  29. [29]

    B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J.201, 1 (1975)

    1975

  30. [30]

    Density Perturbations and Black Hole Formation in Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D54, 6040 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605094

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  31. [31]

    M. Y. Khlopov, Res. Astron. Astrophys.10, 495 (2010), arXiv:0801.0116 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    P. H. Frampton, M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and T. T. Yanagida, JCAP04, 023, arXiv:1001.2308 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Kawasaki, A

    M. Kawasaki, A. Kusenko, Y. Tada, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D94, 083523 (2016), arXiv:1606.07631 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]. 19

    work page arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, Y. Tada, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D95, 123510 (2017), arXiv:1611.06130 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, Y. Tada, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D96, 043504 (2017), arXiv:1701.02544 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Georg and S

    J. Georg and S. Watson, JHEP09, 138, arXiv:1703.04825 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Chen and R

    P. Chen and R. J. Adler, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.124, 103 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0205106

    work page arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Chen, New Astron

    P. Chen, New Astron. Rev.49, 233 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0406514

    work page arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    R. J. Adler, P. Chen, and D. I. Santiago, Gen. Rel. Grav. 33, 2101 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0106080

    work page arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)], arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Linde, Physical Review D49, 748–754 (1994)

    A. Linde, Physical Review D49, 748–754 (1994)

    1994

  43. [43]

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, JCAP04, 022, arXiv:2304.09428 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Alexander, T

    S. Alexander, T. Biswas, and G. Calcagni, Phys. Rev. D81, 043511 (2010), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 069902 (2010)], arXiv:0906.5161 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    I. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rept.357, 113 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0103093

    work page arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    Alexander and T

    S. Alexander and T. Biswas, Physical Review D80, 023501 (2009)

    2009

  47. [47]

    Inagaki, T

    T. Inagaki, T. Muta, and S. D. Odintsov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A8, 2117 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9306023

    work page arXiv 1993

  48. [48]

    Addazi, P

    A. Addazi, P. Chen, and A. Marciano, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 297 (2019), arXiv:1712.04848 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Alexander, P

    S. Alexander, P. Chen, J. Liu, A. Marciano, M. Sasaki, and X.-L. Su, Phys. Lett. B873, 140193 (2026), arXiv:2509.25290 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Loverde and Z

    M. Loverde and Z. J. Weiner, JCAP02, 064, arXiv:2208.11714 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    J. Liu, S. Alexander, and A. Marciano, Phys. Lett. B 866, 139499 (2025), arXiv:2501.08240 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Mercuri, Phys

    S. Mercuri, Phys. Rev. D73, 084016 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0601013

    work page arXiv 2006

  54. [54]

    Alexander, C

    S. Alexander, C. Bambi, A. Marciano, and L. Modesto, Phys. Rev. D90, 123510 (2014), arXiv:1402.5880 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Alexander, Y.-F

    S. Alexander, Y.-F. Cai, and A. Marciano, Phys. Lett. B 745, 97 (2015), arXiv:1406.1456 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    F. W. Hehl, Physics Letters A36, 225 (1971)

    1971

  57. [57]

    F. W. Hehl, General relativity and gravitation4, 333 (1973)

    1973

  58. [58]

    F. W. Hehl, General relativity and gravitation5, 491 (1974)

    1974

  59. [59]

    Lord,Tensors, Relativity and Cosmology(Tata McGraw-Hill, 1976)

    E. Lord,Tensors, Relativity and Cosmology(Tata McGraw-Hill, 1976)

    1976

  60. [60]

    Gasperini and V

    M. Gasperini and V. de Sabbata,Introduc- tion to Gravitation(World Scientific, 1986) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/0233

    work page doi:10.1142/0233 1986

  61. [61]

    De Sabbata and C

    V. De Sabbata and C. Sivaram,Spin and Torsion in Gravitation, G - Reference,Information and Interdisci- plinary Subjects Series (World Scientific, 1994)

    1994

  62. [62]

    R. T. Hammond, Reports on Progress in Physics65, 599 (2002)

    2002

  63. [63]

    Bambi, D

    C. Bambi, D. Malafarina, A. Marcian` o, and L. Modesto, Phys. Lett. B734, 27 (2014), arXiv:1402.5719 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Perez and C

    A. Perez and C. Rovelli, Phys. Rev. D73, 044013 (2006)

    2006

  65. [65]

    Freidel, D

    L. Freidel, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D72, 104002 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507253

    work page arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    de Blas, M

    J. de Blas, M. Chala, and J. Santiago, Phys. Rev. D88, 095011 (2013), arXiv:1307.5068 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Inomata and W

    A. Inomata and W. A. McKinley, Phys. Rev.140, B1467 (1965)

    1965

  68. [68]

    Parker and D

    L. Parker and D. J. Toms, Phys. Rev. D29, 1584 (1984)

    1984

  69. [69]

    Alexander and C

    S. Alexander and C. Creque-Sarbinowski, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104046 (2023), arXiv:2207.05094 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Adshead and E

    P. Adshead and E. I. Sfakianakis, JCAP11, 021, arXiv:1508.00891 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, JHEP09, 022, arXiv:1805.02656 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Adshead, L

    P. Adshead, L. Pearce, M. Peloso, M. A. Roberts, and L. Sorbo, JCAP06, 020, arXiv:1803.04501 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, JHEP01, 105, arXiv:1907.10624 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1907

  74. [74]

    C. M. Sou, X. Tong, and Y. Wang, JHEP06, 129, arXiv:2104.08772 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    X. Chen, J. Fan, and L. Li, JHEP12, 197, arXiv:2303.03406 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Lee and Y

    T.-D. Lee and Y. Pang, Physics Reports221, 251 (1992)

    1992

  77. [77]

    J. A. Frieman, G. B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser, and E. W. Kolb, Physical Review Letters60, 2101 (1988)

    1988

  78. [78]

    G. R. Dvali, A. Kusenko, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B417, 99 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9707423

    work page arXiv 1998

  79. [79]

    Multamaki and I

    T. Multamaki and I. Vilja, Nucl. Phys. B574, 130 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908446

    work page arXiv 2000

  80. [80]

    Axenides, S

    M. Axenides, S. Komineas, L. Perivolaropoulos, and M. Floratos, Phys. Rev. D61, 085006 (2000), arXiv:hep- ph/9910388

    work page arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.