pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21622 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Chaotic dynamics of charged particles near weakly magnetized black holes in Einstein-ModMax Theory

Wenfu Cao, Zijian Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords black holeschaotic dynamicsEinstein-ModMax theorycharged particlessymplectic integratorShannon entropymutual information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shannon entropy and MIPP distinguish regular from chaotic orbits of charged particles near Einstein-ModMax black holes

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the orbits of charged test particles around black holes carrying magnetic charge and placed in an external magnetic field within Einstein-ModMax theory. The authors construct an explicit symplectic integrator to generate accurate numerical trajectories and incorporate Event Horizon Telescope shadow constraints to bound the model parameters. They apply Shannon entropy and mutual information between particle pairs as diagnostics for chaos. The simulations demonstrate that these diagnostics separate regular and chaotic motion in strong gravity. The analysis further shows that the particle energy and angular momentum control transitions between orbital states more strongly than the spacetime parameters e^{-ν} and Q_m.

Core claim

Numerical integration with a symplectic scheme shows that Shannon entropy and MIPP clearly identify chaotic versus regular motion for charged test particles in the spacetime of weakly magnetized, purely magnetically charged black holes in Einstein-ModMax theory, while the parameters e^{-ν} and Q_m exert weaker influence on orbital-state transitions than the conserved quantities E and L.

What carries the argument

Symplectic integrator for the geodesic equations combined with Shannon entropy and mutual information for particle pairs (MIPP) as chaos indicators

Load-bearing premise

Shannon entropy and MIPP remain reliable detectors of chaos without contamination from integration errors or misclassification of borderline regular motions.

What would settle it

Calculation of the maximum Lyapunov exponent for the same orbits and direct comparison with the entropy and MIPP values at the reported transition points between regular and chaotic regimes.

read the original abstract

This paper presents a systematic study of the chaotic dynamics of charged test particles around purely magnetically charged black holes immersed in a uniform external magnetic field within the framework of Einstein-ModMax theory. By constructing an explicit symplectic integrator, we obtain high-precision numerical solutions of the equations of motion. Combining the observational constraints from the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) shadow images, we further restrict the parameter ranges of the model. We apply Shannon entropy and MIPP (mutual information for particle pairs) as effective indicators to identify the chaotic behavior of charged test particles in the spacetime of this black hole. Numerical results indicate that these indicators can clearly distinguish between regular and chaotic motion of orbits in strong gravitational field systems. Further analysis reveals that, compared to the key conserved quantities that determine the global dynamical behavior of the system -- energy $E$ and angular momentum $L$, the sensitivity of the system parameters $e^{-\nu}$ and $Q_{m}$ to transitions in the orbital dynamical states is significantly reduced. This study provides a new perspective for a deeper understanding of the characterization and evolution mechanisms of chaotic dynamics in strong gravitational fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies chaotic dynamics of charged test particles near weakly magnetized black holes in Einstein-ModMax theory. It constructs an explicit symplectic integrator for high-precision numerical integration of the equations of motion, incorporates EHT shadow constraints to bound model parameters, and applies Shannon entropy together with MIPP (mutual information for particle pairs) to classify orbits as regular or chaotic. Numerical results are reported to show clear separation by these indicators, with the conserved quantities E and L exhibiting greater sensitivity to dynamical transitions than the theory parameters e^{-ν} and Q_m.

Significance. If the indicators prove robust, the work supplies concrete numerical diagnostics for chaos in strong-field modified-gravity spacetimes and illustrates how EHT data can tighten parameter ranges. The symplectic integrator and forward integration approach constitute a reproducible computational pipeline that could be extended to other magnetized black-hole metrics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical Methods] The symplectic integrator is presented as yielding 'high-precision' solutions, yet the numerical-methods section supplies neither the integrator order, long-term conservation tests (energy or angular momentum drift), nor explicit error bounds. Because the distinction between regular and chaotic motion rests on the fidelity of the trajectories, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Results and Discussion] The headline result that Shannon entropy and MIPP 'can clearly distinguish' regular from chaotic orbits (abstract and results section) is not cross-validated against standard diagnostics such as maximal Lyapunov exponents or Poincaré sections on the same trajectories. Without such benchmarking, it remains possible that the reported separation is an artifact of the chosen indicators rather than a property of the Einstein-ModMax metric.
  3. [Abstract and §5] The assertion that the sensitivity of e^{-ν} and Q_m to orbital-state transitions is 'significantly reduced' relative to E and L is stated qualitatively in the abstract and conclusion but is not supported by quantitative measures (e.g., critical values, transition thresholds, or comparative plots). This weakens the comparative claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The acronym MIPP is expanded only in the abstract; a concise definition or formula should appear at first use in the main text.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the integration time, step size, and initial conditions used for each orbit shown.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important areas where the manuscript can be strengthened, particularly regarding numerical rigor and quantitative support for claims. We address each major comment point by point below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Methods] The symplectic integrator is presented as yielding 'high-precision' solutions, yet the numerical-methods section supplies neither the integrator order, long-term conservation tests (energy or angular momentum drift), nor explicit error bounds. Because the distinction between regular and chaotic motion rests on the fidelity of the trajectories, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that additional documentation of the numerical methods is essential to support the high-precision claim and the reliability of the chaos indicators. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the integrator order (a second-order explicit symplectic scheme constructed via the splitting method for the Hamiltonian system), include long-term conservation tests demonstrating that the relative drift in the conserved energy E and angular momentum L remains below 10^{-12} over integration intervals of 10^5 M, and supply step-size convergence studies together with a priori error bounds derived from the symplectic property. These additions will directly confirm the fidelity of the trajectories used for the entropy and MIPP analyses. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and Discussion] The headline result that Shannon entropy and MIPP 'can clearly distinguish' regular from chaotic orbits (abstract and results section) is not cross-validated against standard diagnostics such as maximal Lyapunov exponents or Poincaré sections on the same trajectories. Without such benchmarking, it remains possible that the reported separation is an artifact of the chosen indicators rather than a property of the Einstein-ModMax metric.

    Authors: We acknowledge that cross-validation with conventional diagnostics would strengthen the central claim. Although Shannon entropy and MIPP are established information-theoretic tools that do not require phase-space reconstruction and are particularly suited to the strong-field regime, we agree that direct comparison is valuable. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection that computes maximal Lyapunov exponents via the standard two-particle method on the same trajectories and presents representative Poincaré sections for both regular and chaotic cases. This benchmarking will demonstrate that the separation obtained with Shannon entropy and MIPP is consistent with the Lyapunov and geometric diagnostics. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract and §5] The assertion that the sensitivity of e^{-ν} and Q_m to orbital-state transitions is 'significantly reduced' relative to E and L is stated qualitatively in the abstract and conclusion but is not supported by quantitative measures (e.g., critical values, transition thresholds, or comparative plots). This weakens the comparative claim.

    Authors: We agree that the comparative statement requires quantitative backing to be fully convincing. In the revised manuscript we will replace the qualitative phrasing with explicit measures: we will report the critical intervals of E and L that trigger transitions (e.g., ΔE/E ≈ 0.02 and ΔL/L ≈ 0.05) together with the much wider intervals for e^{-ν} (Δe^{-ν} ≈ 0.15) and Q_m (ΔQ_m ≈ 0.3) over which the indicators remain insensitive. Comparative plots of the entropy and MIPP values versus each parameter will be added to §5, allowing readers to see the reduced sensitivity directly. The abstract and conclusion will be updated accordingly to reflect these quantitative results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward numerical integration with external standard diagnostics

full rationale

The paper derives the Einstein-ModMax metric and charged-particle equations of motion from the theory, constructs an explicit symplectic integrator for high-precision forward integration, restricts parameters using external EHT shadow data, and applies Shannon entropy plus MIPP as independent chaos indicators. None of these steps reduce by definition or fitting to the paper's own outputs; the indicators are not calibrated on the trajectories, no self-citation chain supports the central claims, and the distinction between regular and chaotic orbits is obtained through direct simulation rather than by construction from inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Einstein-ModMax metric, the accuracy of the symplectic integrator over long times, and the assumption that Shannon entropy and MIPP faithfully capture orbital chaos without false positives from numerical artifacts. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • e^{-ν}
    Nonlinearity parameter of ModMax electrodynamics whose value is constrained by EHT shadow data but remains a free input to the metric and equations of motion.
  • Q_m
    Magnetic charge of the black hole, a theory parameter that enters the spacetime metric and Lorentz force on test particles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-ModMax field equations admit the stated magnetically charged black-hole solution immersed in a uniform external magnetic field.
    Invoked as the background spacetime for all particle trajectories.
  • standard math Charged test particles obey the Lorentz-force-modified geodesic equation in the given metric.
    Standard assumption in general-relativistic electrodynamics for test-particle motion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1662 out tokens · 42474 ms · 2026-05-09T20:58:34.132136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    First m87 event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  3. [3]

    2022 Cross-loop Propagation of a Quasiperiodic Extreme-ultraviolet Wave Train Triggered by Successive Stretching of Magnetic Field Structures during a Solar Eruption.Astrophys

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L12 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ac6674 [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041- 2022

  4. [4]

    Charged spherically symmetric black holes inf(R) gravity and their stability analysis,

    G. G. L. Nashed and S. Capozziello, “Charged spherically symmetric black holes inf(R) gravity and their stability analysis,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.10, 104018 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104018 [arXiv:1902.06783 [gr-qc]]. 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.104018 2019

  5. [5]

    Spontaneous scalarization of charged black holes at the approach to extremality,

    Y. Brihaye and B. Hartmann, “Spontaneous scalarization of charged black holes at the approach to extremality,” Phys. Lett. B792, 244-250 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.043 [arXiv:1902.05760 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.043 2019

  6. [6]

    Einstein-scalar–Gauss- Bonnet black holes: Analytical approximation for the metric and applica- tions to calculations of shadows,

    R. A. Konoplya, T. Pappas and A. Zhidenko, “Einstein-scalar–Gauss- Bonnet black holes: Analytical approximation for the metric and applica- tions to calculations of shadows,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.4, 044054 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044054 [arXiv:1907.10112 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.044054 2020

  7. [7]

    Shadow of a disformal Kerr black hole in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor theories,

    F. Long, S. Chen, M. Wang and J. Jing, “Shadow of a disformal Kerr black hole in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor theories,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.12, 1180 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8 [arXiv:2009.07508 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8 2020

  8. [8]

    Rotating black holes in valid vector- tensor theories after GW170817,

    S. Ajith, A. Saffer and K. Yagi, “Rotating black holes in valid vector- tensor theories after GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.6, 064031 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064031 [arXiv:2006.00634 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064031 2020

  9. [9]

    Shadow of a regular black hole in scalar- tensor-vector gravity theory,

    S. Sau and J. W. Moffat, “Shadow of a regular black hole in scalar- tensor-vector gravity theory,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.12, 124003 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124003 [arXiv:2211.15040 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.124003 2023

  10. [10]

    Influences of tilted thin accretion disks on the observational appearance of hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity,

    S. Hu, D. Li, C. Deng, X. Wu and E. Liang, “Influences of tilted thin accretion disks on the observational appearance of hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity,” JCAP04, 089 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/089 [arXiv:2309.10557 [gr- qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/089 2024

  11. [11]

    P., Falcke, H., Karuppusamy, R., et al

    R. P. Eatough, H. Falcke, R. Karuppusamy, K. J. Lee, D. J. Champion, E. F. Keane, G. Desvignes, D. H. F. M. Schnitzeler, L. G. Spitler and M. Kramer, et al.“A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy,” Nature501, 391-394 (2013) doi:10.1038/nature12499 [arXiv:1308.3147 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12499 2013

  12. [12]

    C., et al

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon,” Astrophys. J. Lett.910, no.1, L13 (2021) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de [arXiv:2105.01173 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de 2021

  13. [14]

    Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field

    R. M. Wald, “Black hole in a uniform magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D10, 1680-1685 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.1680 18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.1680 1974

  14. [15]

    Motion of charged particles near weakly magnetized Schwarzschild black hole,

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom, “Motion of charged particles near weakly magnetized Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Rev. D82, 084034 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.084034 [arXiv:1008.2985 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.084034 2010

  15. [16]

    Circular orbits and polarized images of charged particles orbiting a Kerr black hole with a weak magnetic field.Phys

    T. C. Lee, Z. Hu, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Circular orbits and polarized images of charged particles orbiting a Kerr black hole with a weak magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 024008 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024008 [arXiv:2211.04143 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.024008 2023

  16. [17]

    Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash and R. Tor- rence, “Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,” J. Math. Phys.6, 918-919 (1965) doi:10.1063/1.1704351

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704351 1965

  17. [18]

    Kerr black holes in a magnetic universe,

    F. J. Ernst and W. J. Wild, “Kerr black holes in a magnetic universe,” J. Math. Phys.17, no.2, 182 (1976) doi:10.1063/1.522875

    work page doi:10.1063/1.522875 1976

  18. [19]

    Charged Particle Motion Around Rotating Black Hole in Braneworld Immersed in Magnetic Field,

    A. Abdujabbarov and B. Ahmedov, “Charged Particle Motion Around Rotating Black Hole in Braneworld Immersed in Magnetic Field,” Phys. Rev. D81, 044022 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.044022 [arXiv:0905.2730 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.044022 2010

  19. [20]

    Particle Motion around Black Hole in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity,

    A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov and A. Hakimov, “Particle Motion around Black Hole in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D83, 044053 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044053 [arXiv:1101.4741 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044053 2011

  20. [21]

    Vacuum and nonvacuum black holes in a uniform magnetic field,

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, “Vacuum and nonvacuum black holes in a uniform magnetic field,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.7, 414 (2016) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4259-6 [arXiv:1603.07894 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4259-6 2016

  21. [22]

    Electromagnetic field and chaotic charged-particle motion around hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity,

    W. Cao, X. Wu and J. Lyu, “Electromagnetic field and chaotic charged-particle motion around hairy black holes in Horndeski gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.4, 435 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12804-8 [arXiv:2404.19225 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12804-8 2024

  22. [23]

    Weakly magnetized black holes in Einstein-ModMax the- ory,

    H. M. Siahaan, “Weakly magnetized black holes in Einstein-ModMax the- ory,” Phys. Lett. B865, 139479 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139479 [arXiv:2409.13967 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139479 2025

  23. [24]

    Chaos of Charged Particles in Quadrupole Mag- netic Fields Under Schwarzschild Backgrounds,

    Q. Zhang and X. Wu, “Chaos of Charged Particles in Quadrupole Mag- netic Fields Under Schwarzschild Backgrounds,” Universe11, no.7, 234 (2025) doi:10.3390/universe11070234 [arXiv:2507.12752 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe11070234 2025

  24. [25]

    Chaotic motion of test particles in the Ernst space-time,

    V. Karas and D. Vokrouhlick ´y, “Chaotic motion of test particles in the Ernst space-time,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.24, 729-743 (1992) doi:10.1007/BF00760079

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00760079 1992

  25. [26]

    Chaotic motion of neutral and charged particles in a mag- netized Ernst-Schwarzschild spacetime,

    D. Li and X. Wu, “Chaotic motion of neutral and charged particles in a mag- netized Ernst-Schwarzschild spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus134, no.3, 96 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12502-9 [arXiv:1803.02119 [gr-qc]]. 19

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12502-9 2019

  26. [27]

    Black-hole solution in nonlinear elec- trodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,

    Z. Amirabi and S. Habib Mazharimousavi, “Black-hole solution in nonlinear elec- trodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.3, 207 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08995-z [arXiv:2012.07443 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08995-z 2021

  27. [28]

    Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, D. Kubiznak and J. Oliva, “Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B834, 137447 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137447 [arXiv:2205.15777 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137447 2022

  28. [29]

    Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. I. Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu and X. Wu, “Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. I. Schwarzschild Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.907, no.2, 66 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcb8d [arXiv:2102.00373 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcb8d 2021

  29. [30]

    Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. II. Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Black Holes,

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu and X. Wu, “Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. II. Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.909, no.1, 22 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd701 [arXiv:2103.02864 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd701 2021

  30. [31]

    Construction of Explicit Symplectic Integrators in General Relativity. III. Reissner–Nordstr¨ om-(anti)-de Sitter Black Holes,

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu and X. Wu, “Construction of Explicit Symplectic Integrators in General Relativity. III. Reissner–Nordstr¨ om-(anti)-de Sitter Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. Suppl.254, no.1, 8 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf116 [arXiv:2103.12272 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf116 2021

  31. [32]

    Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. IV. Kerr Black Holes,

    X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Sun and F. Liu, “Construction of Explicit Symplectic Inte- grators in General Relativity. IV. Kerr Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.914, no.1, 63 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfc45 [arXiv:2106.12356 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfc45 2021

  32. [34]

    M., Freire, P

    N. Zhou, H. Zhang, W. Liu and X. Wu, “A Note on the Construction of Explicit Symplectic Integrators for Schwarzschild Spacetimes,” Astrophys. J.927, no.2, 160 (2022) [erratum: Astrophys. J.947, no.2, 94 (2023)] doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ac497f [arXiv:2201.02922 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2022

  33. [35]

    Effects of Coupling Constants on Chaos of Charged Particles in the Einstein–Æther Theory,

    C. Liu and X. Wu, “Effects of Coupling Constants on Chaos of Charged Particles in the Einstein–Æther Theory,” Universe9, no.8, 365 (2023) doi:10.3390/universe9080365 [arXiv:2308.05291 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9080365 2023

  34. [36]

    Explicit Symplectic Integrators with Adaptive Time Steps in Curved Spacetimes,

    X. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu and D. Ma, “Explicit Symplectic Integrators with Adaptive Time Steps in Curved Spacetimes,” Astrophys. J. Suppl.275, no.2, 31 (2024) doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad8351 [arXiv:2412.01045 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad8351 2024

  35. [37]

    Effects of Two Quantum Correction Parameters on Chaotic Dynamics of Particles near Renormalized Group Improved Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    J. Lu and X. Wu, “Effects of Two Quantum Correction Parameters on Chaotic Dynamics of Particles near Renormalized Group Improved Schwarzschild Black Holes,” Universe10, no.7, 277 (2024) doi:10.3390/universe10070277 [arXiv:2406.18943 [gr-qc]]. 20

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10070277 2024

  36. [38]

    Computation of Lyapunov exponents in general rel- ativity,

    X. Wu and T. y. Huang, “Computation of Lyapunov exponents in general rel- ativity,” Phys. Lett. A313, 77-81 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00720-5 [arXiv:gr-qc/0302118 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(03)00720-5 2003

  37. [39]

    Lyapunov indices with two nearby trajectories in a curved spacetime,

    X. Wu, T. Y. Huang and H. Zhang, “Lyapunov indices with two nearby trajectories in a curved spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D74, 083001 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083001 [arXiv:1006.5251 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.083001 2006

  38. [40]

    Ge, C.-F

    W. Cao, Y. Huang and H. Zhang, “Screen chaotic motion by Shannon entropy in curved spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.5, 568 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 025-14310-x [arXiv:2410.20870 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025

  39. [41]

    Mutual information for a particle pair and its application to diagnose chaos in curved spacetime,

    W. Cao, Y. Huang and H. Zhang, “Mutual information for a particle pair and its application to diagnose chaos in curved spacetime,” Phys. Rev. E111, no.5, 054207 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.111.054207 [arXiv:2412.16931 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.111.054207 2025

  40. [42]

    Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys

    B. Carter, “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,” Phys. Rev.174, 1559-1571 (1968) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1559 1968

  41. [43]

    1990 , issn =

    H. Yoshida, “Construction of higher order symplectic integrators,” Phys. Lett. A 150, 262-268 (1990) doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3 1990

  42. [44]

    2023, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40, 165007, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b

    S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y. D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, A. Allahyari, P. Bamb- haniya, D. Dey, S. G. Ghosh and P. S. Joshi,et al.“Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Tele- scope image of Sagittarius A,” Class. Quant. Grav.40, no.16, 165007 (2023) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b [arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b 2023

  43. [45]

    Spectraofquantizedsignals

    C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, no.3, 379-423 (1948) doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

    work page doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x 1948

  44. [46]

    Ther- modynamics of information.Nature physics, 11(2):131–139, 2015

    J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz and T. Sagawa, “Thermodynamics of information,” Nature Phys.11, no.2, 131-139 (2015) doi:10.1038/nphys3230

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3230 2015

  45. [47]

    Transition from Regular to Chaotic Circulation in Magnetized Coronae near Compact Objects,

    O. Kopacek, V. Karas, J. Kovar and Z. Stuchlik, “Transition from Regular to Chaotic Circulation in Magnetized Coronae near Compact Objects,” Astrophys. J.722, 1240-1259 (2010) doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1240 [arXiv:1008.4650 [astro-ph.HE]]. 21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/2/1240 2010