pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21842 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Critical role of phase-dependent properties in modeling photothermal sintering of LiCoO2 cathodes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords photothermal sinteringLiCoO2amorphous phasethermal conductivityneural network potentialgrain sizeoptical propertiessolid-state batteries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase-dependent properties cause amorphous LiCoO2 to reach higher peak temperatures during photothermal sintering than constant-property models predict.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard models for photothermal sintering of LiCoO2 cathodes rely on averaged, constant properties that do not distinguish between amorphous and crystalline phases. The paper shows that amorphous LiCoO2 absorbs light more strongly and has lower thermal conductivity, resulting in higher local temperatures and narrower safe operating windows. A data-driven approach using a neural network potential provides accurate phase-specific thermal conductivities, which are then used in a grain-size aware model and combined with optical measurements. Simulations reveal that ignoring these differences leads to overestimation of safe conditions. This matters because accurate modeling is needed to prevent thermal damage in manufacturing thin-film solid-state batteries.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that crystalline, constant-property models systematically overestimate safe operating windows for photothermal sintering of LiCoO2 because amorphous LiCoO2 absorbs more strongly at the relevant wavelengths and conducts heat less efficiently. They achieve this by training an Allegro neural network potential to compute thermal conductivities via Green-Kubo methods for both phases, employing a thin-interface model to capture grain-size dependence with amorphous material as the intergranular phase, and integrating these with measured optical properties in multiphysics simulations.

What carries the argument

The Allegro neural network potential trained to near-ab initio accuracy for computing phase-specific thermal conductivities, integrated with a thin-interface model that treats amorphous LiCoO2 as an effective intergranular phase to reproduce grain-size effects on thermal transport.

Load-bearing premise

The trained neural network potential accurately reproduces thermal conductivities for both amorphous and crystalline LiCoO2 phases, and the thin-interface model correctly represents grain-size effects on heat transport.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of peak temperatures reached during photothermal sintering of LiCoO2 films starting in amorphous versus crystalline states, or experimental thermal conductivity data as a function of grain size in sintered films.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21842 by Benoit Skl\'enard, Vladyslav Turlo, Wouter Vels, Yang Hu, Yaroslav E. Romanyuk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Detailed workflow of the study. (i) A foundational neural network potential, Matlantis [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Amorphous LCO generated at different densities exhibits negligible structural differences. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Grain-size dependence of the thermal conductivity at 100, 200, 300, 1000, and 1500 K. Experi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multiphysics simulations, informed by measured optical and computed thermal properties, show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Photothermal (photonic) sintering crystallizes as-deposited amorphous LiCoO2 (LCO) cathodes for solid-state thin-film batteries using millisecond, surface-localized heating. However, process design often relies on 1D models with phase-averaged, temperature-independent properties, which can mispredict peak temperatures and thermal damage margins. Here we develop a multiscale, data-driven framework that provides phase- and grain size-resolved thermophysical inputs for stoichiometric LCO. We train an Allegro neural network potential with near-ab initio accuracy, enabling Green-Kubo calculations of thermal conductivity for crystalline and amorphous phases. The low, weakly density-dependent conductivity of amorphous LCO motivates its use as an effective intergranular phase in a thin-interface model that reproduces observed grain-size-dependent thermal transport. Combined with measured wavelength-resolved optical properties in 1D multiphysics simulations, we show amorphous LCO absorbs more strongly and reaches higher peak temperatures than crystalline LCO; thus crystalline, constant-property models systematically overestimate safe operating windows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a multiscale framework for modeling photothermal sintering of LiCoO2 cathodes. It trains an Allegro neural network potential to enable Green-Kubo calculations of thermal conductivity in crystalline and amorphous phases, incorporates a thin-interface model for grain-size effects, and combines these with measured wavelength-resolved optical properties in 1D multiphysics simulations. The central claim is that amorphous LCO absorbs more strongly and reaches higher peak temperatures than crystalline LCO, so that constant-property models systematically overestimate safe operating windows.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, the work is significant for highlighting how phase-dependent thermophysical properties (particularly lower thermal conductivity and higher optical absorption in the amorphous phase) affect peak temperature predictions and process margins in photothermal sintering of thin-film battery cathodes. The integration of machine-learned potentials with Green-Kubo transport calculations and a grain-size model represents a methodological advance over phase-averaged approaches, provided the underlying accuracy is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (Allegro potential training and Green-Kubo calculations)] The validation of the Allegro neural network potential for amorphous-phase thermal conductivity is insufficiently documented. No direct comparisons of computed κ_amorphous to DFT benchmarks or experimental data are reported, nor are training-set details (e.g., fraction of amorphous configurations) or error bars on the resulting 1-D temperature fields; this directly undermines the quantitative claim that amorphous LCO produces measurably higher peak temperatures.
  2. [Thin-interface model and grain-size effects] The thin-interface grain-size model is presented as reproducing observed grain-size-dependent transport, but the mapping from Green-Kubo bulk conductivities to effective intergranular properties is not shown to be parameter-free or independently validated against grain-boundary scattering data; this assumption is load-bearing for the phase-resolved temperature predictions.
  3. [Abstract and Results] No quantitative results (e.g., peak temperature differences, error bars, or direct comparison of phase-dependent vs. constant-property 1D simulations) are supplied in the abstract or summary, making it impossible to assess the magnitude of the claimed overestimation of safe operating windows.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for thermal conductivity (κ) and optical absorption coefficients should be defined consistently across sections and figures.
  2. Figure captions for the 1D temperature profiles should explicitly state the pulse parameters, boundary conditions, and which curves correspond to crystalline vs. amorphous cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help us improve the clarity and documentation of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested changes where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods (Allegro potential training and Green-Kubo calculations)] The validation of the Allegro neural network potential for amorphous-phase thermal conductivity is insufficiently documented. No direct comparisons of computed κ_amorphous to DFT benchmarks or experimental data are reported, nor are training-set details (e.g., fraction of amorphous configurations) or error bars on the resulting 1-D temperature fields; this directly undermines the quantitative claim that amorphous LCO produces measurably higher peak temperatures.

    Authors: We agree that the validation details for the amorphous phase require more explicit documentation to support the quantitative temperature predictions. In the revised manuscript, we will add direct comparisons of the computed amorphous thermal conductivity to available DFT benchmarks, include training-set composition details such as the fraction of amorphous configurations used, and report error bars on the 1-D temperature fields propagated from the neural network potential uncertainties. These additions will be placed in the Methods section and Supporting Information. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Thin-interface model and grain-size effects] The thin-interface grain-size model is presented as reproducing observed grain-size-dependent transport, but the mapping from Green-Kubo bulk conductivities to effective intergranular properties is not shown to be parameter-free or independently validated against grain-boundary scattering data; this assumption is load-bearing for the phase-resolved temperature predictions.

    Authors: The thin-interface model derives effective intergranular properties directly from the phase-specific Green-Kubo conductivities to match literature observations of grain-size-dependent transport. While the mapping incorporates some assumptions about interface resistance, it is not fitted to arbitrary parameters. In the revision, we will explicitly detail the mapping procedure, clarify its grounding in the bulk conductivities, and add a discussion of any available grain-boundary scattering data for independent validation to the extent such data exist. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract and Results] No quantitative results (e.g., peak temperature differences, error bars, or direct comparison of phase-dependent vs. constant-property 1D simulations) are supplied in the abstract or summary, making it impossible to assess the magnitude of the claimed overestimation of safe operating windows.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract and summary sections currently lack specific numerical results. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to include quantitative values such as the peak temperature differences between amorphous and crystalline phases, associated uncertainties, and a concise comparison of phase-dependent versus constant-property 1D simulation outcomes to quantify the overestimation of safe operating windows. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses externally trained NN potential and measured optical data

full rationale

The paper trains an Allegro neural network potential (with near-ab initio accuracy) on separate reference data, then applies Green-Kubo to obtain phase-specific thermal conductivities and combines these with independently measured wavelength-resolved optical properties in 1D multiphysics simulations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz imported from the authors' prior work; the temperature predictions and overestimation claim follow directly from these external inputs without redefinition or statistical forcing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on two domain assumptions about the neural-network potential and the thin-interface representation; no explicit free parameters or new entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Allegro neural network potential achieves near-ab initio accuracy for thermophysical properties of both crystalline and amorphous stoichiometric LCO.
    Invoked to justify Green-Kubo calculations of thermal conductivity.
  • domain assumption Amorphous LCO can be treated as a low-conductivity effective intergranular phase in a thin-interface model that reproduces grain-size-dependent transport.
    Used to motivate the multiscale thermal-transport description.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1296 out tokens · 50956 ms · 2026-05-09T21:15:19.291569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Atomic resolution of lithium ions in LiCoO 2,

    Y. Shao-Horn, L. Croguennec, C. Delmas, E. C. Nelson, and M. A. O’Keefe, “Atomic resolution of lithium ions in LiCoO 2,”Nature Materials, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 464–467, 2003

  2. [2]

    Sputtered LiCoO 2 cathode materials for all-solid-state thin-film lithium microbatteries,

    C. M. Julien, A. Mauger, and O. M. Hussain, “Sputtered LiCoO 2 cathode materials for all-solid-state thin-film lithium microbatteries,”Materials, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 2687, 2019

  3. [3]

    Solid-state redox reactions of LiCoO2 (R3m) for 4 volt secondary lithium cells,

    T. Ohzuku and A. Ueda, “Solid-state redox reactions of LiCoO2 (R3m) for 4 volt secondary lithium cells,”Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 141, no. 11, p. 2972, 1994

  4. [4]

    LiCoO 2: Formation, structure, lithium and oxygen nonstoichiometry, elec- trochemical behaviour and transport properties,

    E. Antolini, “LiCoO 2: Formation, structure, lithium and oxygen nonstoichiometry, elec- trochemical behaviour and transport properties,”Solid State Ionics, vol. 170, no. 3-4, pp. 159–171, 2004

  5. [5]

    Electrochemical evaluation of LiCoO 2 synthesized by decomposition and intercalation of hydroxides for lithium-ion battery ap- plications,

    B. Huang, Y. Jang, Y. Chiang, and D. Sadoway, “Electrochemical evaluation of LiCoO 2 synthesized by decomposition and intercalation of hydroxides for lithium-ion battery ap- plications,”Journal of applied electrochemistry, vol. 28, pp. 1365–1369, 1998

  6. [6]

    Trace doping of multiple elements enables stable battery cycling of LiCoO 2 at 4.6 V,

    J.-N. Zhang, Q. Li, C. Ouyang, X. Yu, M. Ge, X. Huang, E. Hu, C. Ma, S. Li, R. Xiao, et al., “Trace doping of multiple elements enables stable battery cycling of LiCoO 2 at 4.6 V,”Nature Energy, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 594–603, 2019

  7. [7]

    Ni-Al-Cr superalloy as high temperature cathode current collector for advanced thin film Li batteries,

    A. N. Filippin, T.-Y. Lin, M. Rawlence, T. Z¨ und, K. Kravchyk, J. Sastre-Pellicer, S. G. Haass, A. W¨ ackerlin, M. V. Kovalenko, and S. Buecheler, “Ni-Al-Cr superalloy as high temperature cathode current collector for advanced thin film Li batteries,”Rsc Advances, vol. 8, no. 36, pp. 20304–20313, 2018

  8. [8]

    Chromium nitride as a sta- ble cathode current collector for all-solid-state thin film Li-ion batteries,

    A. N. Filippin, M. Rawlence, A. W¨ ackerlin, T. Feurer, T. Z¨ und, K. Kravchyk, M. V. Kovalenko, Y. E. Romanyuk, A. N. Tiwari, and S. Buecheler, “Chromium nitride as a sta- ble cathode current collector for all-solid-state thin film Li-ion batteries,”RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 43, pp. 26960–26967, 2017

  9. [9]

    Directly integrated all-solid- state flexible lithium batteries on polymer substrate,

    H. Yim, S.-H. Yu, S. H. Baek, Y.-E. Sung, and J.-W. Choi, “Directly integrated all-solid- state flexible lithium batteries on polymer substrate,”Journal of Power Sources, vol. 455, p. 227978, 2020

  10. [10]

    Recent advances in printed thin-film batteries,

    B. Clement, M. Lyu, E. S. Kulkarni, T. Lin, Y. Hu, V. Lockett, C. Greig, and L. Wang, “Recent advances in printed thin-film batteries,”Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 238–261, 2022

  11. [11]

    Rebohle, S

    L. Rebohle, S. Prucnal, and D. Reichel,Flash lamp annealing. Switzerland: Springer, 2019

  12. [12]

    Photonic methods for rapid crystallization of LiMn 2O4 cathodes for solid-state thin-film batteries,

    X. Chen, J. Sastre, M. Rumpel, A. Flegler, A. Singhania, J. B. Bonner, P. Hoffmann, and Y. E. Romanyuk, “Photonic methods for rapid crystallization of LiMn 2O4 cathodes for solid-state thin-film batteries,”Journal of Power Sources, vol. 495, p. 229424, 2021

  13. [13]

    Temperature measurement in rapid thermal processing with focus on the application to flash lamp annealing,

    D. Reichel, W. Skorupa, W. Lerch, and J. Gelpey, “Temperature measurement in rapid thermal processing with focus on the application to flash lamp annealing,”Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 102–128, 2011. 15

  14. [14]

    Simulating the thermal response of thin films during photonic curing,

    M. J. Guillot, S. C. McCool, and K. A. Schroder, “Simulating the thermal response of thin films during photonic curing,” inASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 45233, pp. 19–27, 2012

  15. [15]

    Anisotropic heat conduction in ion-substituted layered cobalt oxides,

    H. J. Cho, Y. Takashima, Y. Nezu, T. Onozato, and H. Ohta, “Anisotropic heat conduction in ion-substituted layered cobalt oxides,”Advanced Materials Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 1901816, 2020

  16. [16]

    Electrochemically tunable thermal conductivity of lithium cobalt oxide,

    J. Cho, M. D. Losego, H. G. Zhang, H. Kim, J. Zuo, I. Petrov, D. G. Cahill, and P. V. Braun, “Electrochemically tunable thermal conductivity of lithium cobalt oxide,”Nature communications, vol. 5, no. 4035, pp. 1–6, 2014

  17. [17]

    Thermal conductivity of A xBO2-type layered oxides Na0.77MnO2 and LiCoO 2,

    K. Takahata and I. Terasaki, “Thermal conductivity of A xBO2-type layered oxides Na0.77MnO2 and LiCoO 2,”Japanese journal of applied physics, vol. 41, no. 2R, p. 763, 2002

  18. [18]

    Thermoelec- tric properties of LiCo 1−xMxO2 (M= Cu, Mg, Ni, Zn): Comparison with LiyCoO 2 and NayCoO2 systems,

    S. Mizuno, H. Fujishiro, M. Ishizawa, T. Naito, H. Katsui, and T. Goto, “Thermoelec- tric properties of LiCo 1−xMxO2 (M= Cu, Mg, Ni, Zn): Comparison with LiyCoO 2 and NayCoO2 systems,”Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 56, no. 2, p. 021101, 2017

  19. [19]

    Phon: A program to calculate phonons using the small displacement method,

    D. Alf` e, “Phon: A program to calculate phonons using the small displacement method,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 12, pp. 2622–2633, 2009

  20. [20]

    Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, “Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 35, no. 35, p. 353001, 2023

  21. [21]

    Quantum prediction of ultra-low thermal conductivity in lithium intercalation materials,

    T. Feng, A. O’hara, and S. T. Pantelides, “Quantum prediction of ultra-low thermal conductivity in lithium intercalation materials,”Nano Energy, vol. 75, p. 104916, 2020

  22. [22]

    Lattice model calculation of the strain energy density and other properties of crystalline LiCoO 2,

    F. Hart and J. Bates, “Lattice model calculation of the strain energy density and other properties of crystalline LiCoO 2,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 7560– 7566, 1998

  23. [23]

    An interatomic potential for the Li-Co-O ternary system,

    E. Lee, K.-R. Lee, and B.-J. Lee, “An interatomic potential for the Li-Co-O ternary system,”Computational Materials Science, vol. 142, pp. 47–58, 2018

  24. [24]

    Diffusion behaviors of lithium ions at the cathode/electrolyte interface from a global neural network potential,

    Y. Sun, C. Shang, Y.-B. Fang, Z.-P. Liu, X.-G. Gong, and J.-H. Yang, “Diffusion behaviors of lithium ions at the cathode/electrolyte interface from a global neural network potential,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 12, no. 48, pp. 33808–33817, 2024

  25. [25]

    Matlantis, software as a service style material discovery tool

    S. Takamoto, C. Shinagawa, D. Motoki, K. Nakago, W. Li, I. Kurata, T. Watan- abe, Y. Yayama, H. Iriguchi, Y. Asano, T. Onodera, T. Ishii, T. Kudo, H. Ono, R. Sawada, R. Ishitani, M. Ong, T. Yamaguchi, T. Kataoka, A. Hayashi, N. Charoen- phakdee, and T. Ibuka, “Matlantis, software as a service style material discovery tool.” https://matlantis.com/

  26. [26]

    Towards universal neural network potential for material discovery applicable to arbitrary combination of 45 elements,

    S. Takamoto, C. Shinagawa, D. Motoki, K. Nakago, W. Li, I. Kurata, T. Watanabe, Y. Yayama, H. Iriguchi, Y. Asano,et al., “Towards universal neural network potential for material discovery applicable to arbitrary combination of 45 elements,”Nature Commu- nications, vol. 13, no. 2991, pp. 1–11, 2022

  27. [27]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,”Physical review letters, vol. 77, no. 18, p. 3865, 1996

  28. [28]

    The DFT+U: Approaches, accuracy, and applications,

    S. A. Tolba, K. M. Gameel, B. A. Ali, H. A. Almossalami, and N. K. Allam, “The DFT+U: Approaches, accuracy, and applications,” inDensity Functional Calculations-Recent Pro- gresses of Theory and Application, IntechOpen, 2018

  29. [29]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu,

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 132, no. 15, p. 154104, 2010

  30. [30]

    Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics,

    A. Musaelian, S. Batzner, A. Johansson, L. Sun, C. J. Owen, M. Kornbluth, and B. Kozin- sky, “Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics,”Na- ture Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 579, 2023

  31. [31]

    A new model for the effective thermal conductivity of polycrys- talline solids,

    F. Badry and K. Ahmed, “A new model for the effective thermal conductivity of polycrys- talline solids,”AIP advances, vol. 10, 2020

  32. [32]

    Anisotropic thermal diffusivity and conductivity of ybco (123) and ybco (211) mixed crystals. i,

    H. Fujishiro, M. Ikebe, T. Naito, K. Noto, S. Kohayashi, and S. Yoshizawa, “Anisotropic thermal diffusivity and conductivity of ybco (123) and ybco (211) mixed crystals. i,” Japanese journal of applied physics, vol. 33, no. 9R, p. 4965, 1994

  33. [33]

    Thermal diffusivity by the laser flash technique,

    S. F. Corbin and D. M. Turriff, “Thermal diffusivity by the laser flash technique,”Char- acterization of Materials, pp. 1–10, 2002. 16

  34. [34]

    Johra,Description of the Laser Flash Analysis Method for Thermal Diffusivity Mea- surement with the LFA 447

    H. Johra,Description of the Laser Flash Analysis Method for Thermal Diffusivity Mea- surement with the LFA 447. No. 73 in DCE Lecture notes, Denmark: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2019

  35. [35]

    Decreasing the uncertainty of classical laser flash analysis using numerical algorithms robust to noise and systematic errors,

    A. Lunev and R. Heymer, “Decreasing the uncertainty of classical laser flash analysis using numerical algorithms robust to noise and systematic errors,”Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 91, no. 6, 2020

  36. [36]

    Model for lattice thermal conductivity at low temperatures,

    J. Callaway, “Model for lattice thermal conductivity at low temperatures,”Physical Re- view, vol. 113, p. 1046, 1959

  37. [37]

    Effect of point imperfections on lattice thermal con- ductivity,

    J. Callaway and H. C. von Baeyer, “Effect of point imperfections on lattice thermal con- ductivity,”Physical Review, vol. 120, p. 1149, 1960

  38. [38]

    Introduction to comsol multiphysics®,

    C. Multiphysics, “Introduction to comsol multiphysics®,”COMSOL Multiphysics, Burlington, MA, accessed Feb, vol. 9, no. 2018, p. 32, 1998

  39. [39]

    Analytical model for the optical functions of amorphous semiconductors from the near-infrared to ultraviolet: Applications in thin film photovoltaics,

    A. S. Ferlauto, G. M. Ferreira, J. M. Pearce, C. R. Wronski, R. W. Collins, X. Deng, and G. Ganguly, “Analytical model for the optical functions of amorphous semiconductors from the near-infrared to ultraviolet: Applications in thin film photovoltaics,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 2424–2436, 2002. 531 citations - Most comprehensive mode...

  40. [40]

    A universal Urbach rule for disordered organic semiconductors,

    C. Kaiser, O. J. Sandberg, N. Zarrabi, W. Li, P. Meredith, and A. Armin, “A universal Urbach rule for disordered organic semiconductors,”Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 3988, 2021. 181 citations - Demonstrates universal relationship between Urbach energy and disorder

  41. [41]

    Black TiO 2 synthesis by chemical reduction methods for photocatalysis applications,

    L. Andronic and A. Enescu, “Black TiO 2 synthesis by chemical reduction methods for photocatalysis applications,”Frontiers in Chemistry, vol. 8, p. 565489, 2020. 101 citations - Discusses defect-enhanced optical absorption in transition metal oxides

  42. [42]

    Thermodynamic properties of stoichiometric lithium cobaltite LiCoO 2,

    O. Jankovsky, J. Kovarik, J. Leitner, K. Ruzicka, and D. Sedmidubsky, “Thermodynamic properties of stoichiometric lithium cobaltite LiCoO 2,”Thermochimica Acta, vol. 634, pp. 26–30, 2016

  43. [43]

    Flash lamp annealing enables thin-film solid-state batteries on aluminum foil,

    X. Chen, J. Sastre, A. Aribia, E. Gilshtein, and Y. E. Romanyuk, “Flash lamp annealing enables thin-film solid-state batteries on aluminum foil,”ACS Applied Energy Materials, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 5408–5414, 2021

  44. [44]

    Lithium cobalt oxide cathode film prepared by rf sputtering,

    C.-L. Liao and K.-Z. Fung, “Lithium cobalt oxide cathode film prepared by rf sputtering,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2004

  45. [45]

    Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics,

    S. Plimpton, “Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1995

  46. [46]

    The atomic simulation environ- ment—a python library for working with atoms,

    A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Du lak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus,et al., “The atomic simulation environ- ment—a python library for working with atoms,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 29, no. 27, p. 273002, 2017

  47. [47]

    Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool,

    A. Stukowski, “Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool,”Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 015012, 2010

  48. [48]

    Robust structural identification via polyhe- dral template matching,

    P. M. Larsen, S. Schmidt, and J. Schiøtz, “Robust structural identification via polyhe- dral template matching,”Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 055007, 2016

  49. [49]

    The materials project: Accelerating materials design through theory-driven data and tools,

    A. Jain, J. Montoya, S. Dwaraknath, N. E. Zimmermann, J. Dagdelen, M. Horton, P. Huck, D. Winston, S. Cholia, S. P. Ong, and K. Persson, “The materials project: Accelerating materials design through theory-driven data and tools,” inHandbook of Materials Mod- eling: Methods: Theory and Modeling(W. Andreoni and Y. S., eds.), pp. 1751–1784, Switzerland: Spri...

  50. [50]

    Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress,

    W. Shinoda, M. Shiga, and M. Mikami, “Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress,”Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 13, p. 134103, 2004

  51. [51]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 558–561, 1993

  52. [52]

    Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid- metalamorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid- metalamorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 49, no. 20, pp. 14251–14269, 1994. 17

  53. [53]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy cal- culations using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy cal- culations using a plane-wave basis set,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 54, no. 16, pp. 11169–11186, 1996

  54. [54]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,”Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–50, 1996

  55. [55]

    Ab-initio simulations of materials using vasp: Density-functional theory and beyond,

    J. Hafner, “Ab-initio simulations of materials using vasp: Density-functional theory and beyond,”Journal of computational chemistry, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2044–2078, 2008

  56. [56]

    Electron- energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study,

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, “Electron- energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study,” Physical Review B, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 1505, 1998

  57. [57]

    An efficient algorithm for finding the minimum energy path for cation migration in ionic materials,

    Z. Rong, D. Kitchaev, P. Canepa, W. Huang, and G. Ceder, “An efficient algorithm for finding the minimum energy path for cation migration in ionic materials,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 145, no. 7, p. 74112, 2016

  58. [58]

    E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials,

    S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, L. Sun, M. Geiger, J. P. Mailoa, M. Kornbluth, N. Molinari, T. E. Smidt, and B. Kozinsky, “E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials,”Nature communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 2453, 2022

  59. [59]

    Directional message passing for molecu- lar graphs,

    J. Gasteiger, J. Groß, and S. G¨ unnemann, “Directional message passing for molecu- lar graphs,”arXiv preprint, 2020. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003. 03123

  60. [60]

    Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)

    D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, “Gaussian error linear units (gelus),” 2016. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08415

  61. [61]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D. P. Kingma and B. J., “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” 2014. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/abs/1412.6980

  62. [62]

    Pytorch: an im- perative style, high-performance deep learning library,

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. K¨ opf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Te- jani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, “Pytorch: an im- perative style, high-performance deep learning library,” inProceedings of the 33rd Inter- nationa...

  63. [63]

    The conjugate gradient method in extremal problems,

    B. T. Polyak, “The conjugate gradient method in extremal problems,”USSR Computa- tional Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 94–112, 1969

  64. [64]

    Structural relaxation made simple,

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, “Structural relaxation made simple,”Physical review letters, vol. 97, no. 17, p. 170201, 2006

  65. [65]

    Band structure diagram paths based on crystallography,

    Y. Hinuma, G. Pizzi, Y. Kumagai, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, “Band structure diagram paths based on crystallography,”Computational Materials Science, vol. 128, pp. 140–184, 2017

  66. [66]

    Spglib: a software library for crystal symmetry search,

    A. Togo, K. Shinohara, and I. Tanaka, “Spglib: a software library for crystal symmetry search,”Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2384822, 2024

  67. [67]

    Equivariant graph neural network inter- atomic potential for green-kubo thermal conductivity in phase change materials,

    S.-H. Lee, J. Li, V. Olevano, and B. Skl´ enard, “Equivariant graph neural network inter- atomic potential for green-kubo thermal conductivity in phase change materials,”Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 8, p. 033802, Mar 2024. 18