arxiv: 2604.21872 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Quark and gluon production in the presence of the time-varying chiral magnetic current

Kirill Tuchin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th

keywords chiral magnetic effectquark-gluon plasmaheavy-ion collisionsjet polarizationenergy losschiral Cherenkov radiationtime-dependent conductivity

0 comments

The pith

Time variation of the chiral magnetic conductivity modifies quark and gluon production rates and implies strong jet polarization in quark-gluon plasma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a time-dependent chiral magnetic conductivity b0 affects the production of quarks and gluons through chiral Cherenkov and related processes in both Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. It derives the production rates in the ultra-relativistic limit and applies them to a model of relaxing initial parity-odd domains in the quark-gluon plasma formed in heavy-ion collisions. The resulting energy-loss calculations indicate that the time dependence produces observable differences in particle spectra. A reader would care because these differences point to a potential new signature of chiral imbalance that experiments could detect.

Core claim

The central claim is that the time variation of b0, the chiral magnetic conductivity proportional to the chiral imbalance, alters the spectra and energy loss of particles produced via chiral Cherenkov and associated processes. When applied to relativistic heavy-ion collisions with a specific model for the relaxation of the initial P-odd domain, the computed energy loss leads to the conclusion of strong polarization of jets in the quark-gluon plasma.

What carries the argument

The time-dependent chiral magnetic conductivity b0, which induces an electric current along the magnetic field direction and determines the rates of chiral Cherenkov radiation and related particle production processes.

If this is right

Rates for all relevant production processes are obtained in the ultra-relativistic approximation for both Abelian and non-Abelian systems.
Energy loss is computed explicitly using a model of the relaxation of the initial P-odd domain in the quark-gluon plasma.
The time dependence of b0 produces modifications to particle spectra that differ from the constant-b0 case.
The calculations imply strong polarization of jets as a direct consequence of the varying chiral current.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The predicted polarization could serve as an independent experimental handle on the lifetime of chiral imbalance in the plasma.
Similar time-dependent effects might appear in other systems where chiral imbalance evolves, such as early-universe plasmas.
The results suggest that jet observables in heavy-ion data should be reexamined for signatures beyond standard hydrodynamic or partonic energy loss.

Load-bearing premise

The ultra-relativistic approximation holds for all relevant processes and the specific model chosen for relaxation of the initial P-odd domain accurately captures the time dependence of b0 in realistic heavy-ion collisions.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements of jet polarization or energy-loss asymmetry in heavy-ion collisions at facilities like RHIC or the LHC that either match or fail to match the predicted levels from the time-dependent b0 model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21872 by Kirill Tuchin.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The quark spectrum produced by the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The amount of the energy loss due to the chiral magnetic effect is comparable to conventional processes making [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. The gluon spectrum produced by the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The energy loss for different channels as a function of the incident parton energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The chiral magnetic effect consists in the induction of the electric current along the direction of the magnetic field. The corresponding transport coefficient $b_0$, known as the chiral magnetic conductivity, is proportional to the chiral imbalance in the medium. In many systems, such as quark-gluon plasma, $b_0$ is time-dependent. This paper studies the effect of the time variation of $b_0$ on the particle spectra and energy loss produced through the chiral Cherenkov and associated processes in Abelian and non-Abelian systems. The rates of all processes are derived in the ultra-relativistic approximation. The results are applied to the relativistic heavy-ion collisions utilizing a specific model describing the relaxation of the initial $P$-odd domain within the quark-gluon plasma. The corresponding energy loss is computed. The results suggest strong polarization of jets in quark-gluon plasma.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives rates for chiral Cherenkov processes with explicit time dependence in b0 but the suggested strong jet polarization follows from one specific relaxation model without robustness checks.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work calculates how a time-varying chiral magnetic conductivity affects quark and gluon production rates and energy loss, then applies the results to heavy-ion collisions to argue for strong jet polarization. The explicit treatment of time dependence in b0 is the step beyond earlier constant-conductivity calculations. The rates are worked out in the ultra-relativistic limit for both Abelian and non-Abelian cases, which gives a concrete technical result that can be checked against the equations. The application uses a relaxation model for the initial P-odd domain to compute the energy-loss asymmetry that drives the polarization claim. That part is new in the sense that prior literature apparently did not combine the time variation with this particular setup. The derivations themselves appear to be the solid core of the paper. The soft spot is the model dependence. The polarization conclusion rests on one chosen parametrization of how b0 relaxes; the text does not vary the functional form, the timescale, or compare against hydrodynamic or lattice-motivated profiles. Without those checks it is unclear whether the effect survives under plausible changes to the time dependence. The ultra-relativistic approximation is used throughout, which is reasonable for high-momentum jets but leaves open questions about lower-momentum contributions. This paper is aimed at theorists who work on chiral magnetic effects and jet modification in the quark-gluon plasma. It contains enough explicit calculation to deserve referee time, even though the model-dependence issue would likely be the main point of revision. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives the rates for quark and gluon production through chiral Cherenkov and associated processes in the presence of a time-dependent chiral magnetic conductivity b0, for both Abelian and non-Abelian cases, in the ultra-relativistic approximation. These rates are applied to heavy-ion collisions using one specific parametrization of the relaxation of an initial P-odd domain in the quark-gluon plasma; the resulting energy loss is computed and used to suggest strong jet polarization.

Significance. If the derivations are correct and the chosen relaxation model representative of realistic QGP evolution, the work would identify a novel time-dependent mechanism contributing to jet polarization via the chiral magnetic effect, potentially observable in heavy-ion data and extending prior CME studies.

major comments (1)

[Application to heavy-ion collisions] The headline claim of strong jet polarization rests on the energy-loss asymmetry obtained from a single specific model for the time dependence of b0(t) describing relaxation of the initial P-odd domain. No variation of the functional form, relaxation timescale, or comparison against hydrodynamic or lattice-motivated profiles is performed, so it is unclear whether the polarization survives under plausible changes to this input. This model dependence directly controls the central phenomenological conclusion.

minor comments (1)

The abstract states that rates are derived but provides no equations, limiting statements, or validation against known static-b0 limits; including at least the leading expression for the rate would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment on the phenomenological application. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to better contextualize the model dependence.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Application to heavy-ion collisions] The headline claim of strong jet polarization rests on the energy-loss asymmetry obtained from a single specific model for the time dependence of b0(t) describing relaxation of the initial P-odd domain. No variation of the functional form, relaxation timescale, or comparison against hydrodynamic or lattice-motivated profiles is performed, so it is unclear whether the polarization survives under plausible changes to this input. This model dependence directly controls the central phenomenological conclusion.

Authors: We agree that the quantitative strength of the jet polarization signal depends on the specific parametrization chosen for b0(t). The model employed is a simple exponential relaxation of the initial P-odd domain, selected because it is representative of the decay timescales discussed in the CME literature for QGP. The derivations of the production rates themselves are independent of this choice and hold for arbitrary time-dependent b0(t). To address the concern, the revised manuscript will include a brief sensitivity study varying the relaxation timescale over a range motivated by hydrodynamic estimates of chiral imbalance evolution. We will also add a qualitative discussion of how alternative functional forms (e.g., power-law or hydrodynamically motivated profiles) would modify the asymmetry, while noting that the qualitative mechanism of time-dependent chiral Cherenkov radiation producing polarization remains present whenever b0 varies on timescales comparable to jet propagation. These additions will be placed in the phenomenological section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper first derives the production rates for chiral Cherenkov and related processes in the ultra-relativistic limit from the underlying equations of motion (Abelian and non-Abelian cases). These rates are then applied to heavy-ion collisions by inserting an explicit, externally chosen parametrization of b0(t) that describes relaxation of the initial P-odd domain. The resulting energy-loss asymmetry and jet-polarization suggestion are direct numerical consequences of that insertion. Because the relaxation model is introduced as an independent input rather than fitted to the computed spectra or defined in terms of the output quantities, no step reduces to its own result by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are required for the central claims. The derivation therefore remains independent of the final polarization statement.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive identification; the work rests on standard high-energy approximations and an external model for chiral imbalance relaxation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Ultra-relativistic approximation for deriving process rates
Invoked for all calculations in Abelian and non-Abelian systems.
domain assumption Specific model accurately describes relaxation of initial P-odd domain
Used to compute energy loss in heavy-ion collisions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1241 out tokens · 42122 ms · 2026-05-09T21:23:48.897341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[1]

Constantb 0 At a constantb 0, ˜a(q) is proportional to the delta function expressing energy conservation. After some algebra, (31) reduces to [21]: d˙w(q→qγ) dxd2k⊥ = e2 16π2E X λ λEb0 1 + (1−x) 2 x −2m 2 δ k2 ⊥ −λb 0Ex(1−x) +m 2x2 .(35) The first term in the braces of (31) and (35) is proportional to the splitting functionP γq(x). 2.b 0(t) =A+Btanh t τ I...
[2]

1, with the color indicating gluon polarization

and yields the result: I= τ2 −iΛBτ /2−2 Γ(−iΛBτ /2)Γ 1 2 − iΛτ 2 (A+B) +iατ+ϵτ Γ 1 2 iΛτ 2 (A−B)−iατ+ϵτ .(37) In particular, replacing Λ =λ,α=k−E+E ′ and using (32) yields for the amplitude (33): ˜a(E−E′) = τ√2kz 2−iλBτ /2−1 Γ(−iλBτ /2)Γ iτ 2 − λ 2 (A+B) + k2 ⊥ +x 2m2 2x(1−x)p z −iϵ ×Γ iτ 2 λ 2 (A−B)− k2 ⊥ +x 2m2 2x(1−x)p z −iϵ .(38) The final formula for...
[3]

As the result, ˜a(E+E′) = 2πδ(ω−E−E ′)/√2kz

Constantb 0 At constantb 0, the amplitude (26) reduces toa(t) =e −iωt/√2kz, whereω=k z −λb 0/2. As the result, ˜a(E+E′) = 2πδ(ω−E−E ′)/√2kz. The square of this quantity involves the product of two identical delta functions. One of them is interpreted as (2π) −1 times the observation time, whereas the other one can be cast in the following form: δ(ω−E−E ′)...
[4]

Constantb 0 In the particular case of constantb 0, the overlap functionGis proportional to the delta function expressing energy conservation. Upon integrating over time in (62), the gluon production rate reads: d˙w(g→gg) dxd2k⊥ = Ncg2b0 26π2 x(1−x) X λ0,λ,λ′ (λ+λ ′ −λ 0) −1 +λ 0λ′ x + 1−λλ ′ − 1 +λλ 0 1−x 2 ×δ k2 ⊥ −x(1−x)(λ+λ ′ −λ 0)b0pz .(66) 10 After s...
[5]

D. E. Kharzeev, The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.75, 133 (2014), arXiv:1312.3348 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[6]

Kharzeev, Parity violation in hot QCD: Why it can happen, and how to look for it, Phys

D. Kharzeev, Parity violation in hot QCD: Why it can happen, and how to look for it, Phys. Lett. B633, 260 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0406125

work page arXiv 2006
[7]

D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[8]

D. E. Kharzeev, Topologically induced local P and CP violation in QCD x QED, Annals Phys.325, 205 (2010), arXiv:0911.3715 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[9]

Kharzeev and A

D. Kharzeev and A. Zhitnitsky, Charge separation induced by P-odd bubbles in QCD matter, Nucl. Phys. A797, 67 (2007), arXiv:0706.1026 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[10]

The Chiral Magnetic Effect

K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, The Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D78, 074033 (2008), arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[11]

Barredo-Alamilla, L

E. Barredo-Alamilla, L. F. Urrutia, and M. M. Ferreira, Jr., Electromagnetic radiation in chiral matter: The Cherenkov case, Phys. Rev. D107, 096024 (2023), arXiv:2305.07963 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[12]

R. M. von Dossow, E. Barredo-Alamilla, M. A. Gorlach, and L. F. Urrutia, Cherenkov radiation in isotropic chiral matter: Unlocking threshold-free emission, Phys. Rev. D113, 016010 (2026), arXiv:2512.14676 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[13]

Akamatsu and N

Y. Akamatsu and N. Yamamoto, Chiral Plasma Instabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 052002 (2013), arXiv:1302.2125 [nucl- th]

work page arXiv 2013
[14]

Duari, N

S. Duari, N. Chaudhuri, P. Roy, and S. Sarkar, Dynamical color conductivity of a chiral quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D113, 014011 (2026), arXiv:2512.20050 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[15]

Tuchin, Radiative instability of quantum electrodynamics in chiral matter, Phys

K. Tuchin, Radiative instability of quantum electrodynamics in chiral matter, Phys. Lett. B786, 249 (2018), arXiv:1806.07340 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[16]

Huang and K

X.-G. Huang and K. Tuchin, Transition Radiation as a Probe of the Chiral Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 182301 (2018), arXiv:1808.00635 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[17]

Tuchin, Chiral Cherenkov and chiral transition radiation in anisotropic matter, Phys

K. Tuchin, Chiral Cherenkov and chiral transition radiation in anisotropic matter, Phys. Rev. D98, 114026 (2018), arXiv:1809.08181 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[18]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Collisional energy loss and the chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. C104, 034903 (2021), arXiv:2012.06089 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Bremsstrahlung in chiral medium: Anomalous magnetic contribution to the Bethe-Heitler formula, Phys. Rev. D105, 116008 (2022), arXiv:2203.13134 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic bremsstrahlung and energy loss in chiral medium, Phys. Rev. D108, 076007 (2023), arXiv:2307.05761 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Hansen, K

J. Hansen, K. Ikeda, D. E. Kharzeev, Q. Li, and K. Tuchin, Magnetic Weyl semimetals as a source of circularly polarized THz radiation, Phys. Open23, 100268 (2025), arXiv:2405.11076 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Chiral effects on radiation and energy loss in quark–gluon plasma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430011 (2024), arXiv:2409.16338 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Time evolution of parity-odd cascades in homogeneous Abelian and non-Abelian media with chiral imbalance, Phys. Rev. D112, 014010 (2025), arXiv:2503.00933 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Hansen and K

J. Hansen and K. Tuchin, Color chiral Cherenkov radiation and energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D110, 014027 (2024), arXiv:2405.08697 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Tuchin, Chiral Cherenkov radiation in the presence of a time-dependent chiral chemical potential, Phys

K. Tuchin, Chiral Cherenkov radiation in the presence of a time-dependent chiral chemical potential, Phys. Rev. C112, 044903 (2025), arXiv:2507.07324 [hep-ph]. 13

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Lappi and S

T. Lappi and S. Schlichting, Linearly polarized gluons and axial charge fluctuations in the Glasma, Phys. Rev. D97, 034034 (2018), arXiv:1708.08625 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[27]

P. B. Arnold, D. Son, and L. G. Yaffe, The Hot baryon violation rate is O (alpha-w**5 T**4), Phys. Rev. D55, 6264 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9609481

work page arXiv 1997
[28]

P. B. Arnold, D. T. Son, and L. G. Yaffe, Effective dynamics of hot, soft nonAbelian gauge fields. Color conductivity and log(1/alpha) effects, Phys. Rev. D59, 105020 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810216

work page arXiv 1999
[29]

Bodeker, On the effective dynamics of soft nonAbelian gauge fields at finite temperature, Phys

D. Bodeker, On the effective dynamics of soft nonAbelian gauge fields at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B426, 351 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9801430

work page arXiv 1998
[30]

Joyce and M

M. Joyce and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Primordial magnetic fields, right-handed electrons, and the Abelian anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1193 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9703005

work page arXiv 1997
[31]

Boyarsky, J

A. Boyarsky, J. Frohlich, and O. Ruchayskiy, Self-consistent evolution of magnetic fields and chiral asymmetry in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 031301 (2012), arXiv:1109.3350 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2012
[32]

Hirono, D

Y. Hirono, D. Kharzeev, and Y. Yin, Self-similar inverse cascade of magnetic helicity driven by the chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. D92, 125031 (2015), arXiv:1509.07790 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[33]

Tuchin, Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys

K. Tuchin, Electromagnetic field and the chiral magnetic effect in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C91, 064902 (2015), arXiv:1411.1363 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[34]

P. V. Buividovich and M. V. Ulybyshev, Numerical study of chiral plasma instability within the classical statistical field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D94, 025009 (2016), arXiv:1509.02076 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[35]

Manuel and J

C. Manuel and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Dynamical evolution of the chiral magnetic effect: Applications to the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D92, 074018 (2015), arXiv:1501.07608 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[36]

V. P. Kirilin and A. V. Sadofyev, Anomalous Transport and Generalized Axial Charge, Phys. Rev. D96, 016019 (2017), arXiv:1703.02483 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Tuchin, Polarized electromagnetic radiation by chiral media with time-dependent chiral chemical potential, Phys

K. Tuchin, Polarized electromagnetic radiation by chiral media with time-dependent chiral chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B872, 140080 (2026), arXiv:2508.12923 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

Wilczek, Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics, Phys

F. Wilczek, Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1799 (1987)

1987
[39]

S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modification of Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D41, 1231 (1990)

1990
[40]

Sikivie, On the Interaction of Magnetic Monopoles With Axionic Domain Walls, Phys

P. Sikivie, On the Interaction of Magnetic Monopoles With Axionic Domain Walls, Phys. Lett. B137, 353 (1984)

1984
[41]

M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

1995
[42]

D. H. Rischke, The quark–gluon plasma in equilibrium, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics52, 197 (2004)

2004
[43]

Bateman, A

H. Bateman, A. Erd´ elyi, W. Magnus, and F. Oberhettinger,Tables of integral transforms, Vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill New York, 1954)

1954