pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22681 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

The potential of directional neutrino detection to observe neutrino spin oscillations

Konstantin A. Kouzakov , Fedor M. Lazarev , Alexander I. Studenikin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords neutrino magnetic momentspin oscillationsazimuthal asymmetrydirectional detectionelastic scatteringhelicity superpositionrecoil momentaneutrino interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A superposition of left- and right-handed neutrino helicity states produces an azimuthal asymmetry in the angular distribution of recoil momenta.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how a nonzero neutrino magnetic moment leads to spin oscillations in an external magnetic field, altering the behavior of neutrinos in low-energy scattering. It demonstrates that an incoming neutrino in a coherent mixed-helicity state generates an azimuthal asymmetry in the directions of recoiling particles when scattering off electrons, protons, or nuclei such as argon-40 and xenon-132. This asymmetry is absent in pure helicity states and arises directly from the interference in the scattering amplitude. Directional detectors could therefore register a distinctive pattern that reveals the presence of spin oscillations, offering an alternative to flux measurements that might miss the effect. The calculations illustrate the size of the asymmetry for realistic targets and scattering kinematics.

Core claim

The central claim is that the coherent superposition of left- and right-handed helicity components in the neutrino state produces a nonzero azimuthal asymmetry in the differential cross section for elastic scattering. This effect is derived from the general treatment of arbitrary spin-flavor states and is shown numerically for scattering on electrons, protons, and the specified nuclei, indicating that directional information in the recoil momenta can serve as a direct signature of neutrino spin oscillations induced by magnetic moments.

What carries the argument

Azimuthal asymmetry in the angular distribution of recoil momenta, generated by interference between left- and right-handed helicity amplitudes in the neutrino scattering matrix element.

If this is right

  • The asymmetry supplies an observable signature of neutrino spin oscillations in magnetic fields that is independent of overall flux reduction.
  • Numerical results indicate the asymmetry is present and potentially measurable for elastic scattering on electrons, protons, argon-40, and xenon-132.
  • Directional detection provides a new experimental channel to study neutrino magnetic moments through scattering rather than solely through propagation effects.
  • The magnitude and form of the asymmetry depend on the precise spin-flavor composition of the incoming neutrino state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This signature might enable inference of magnetic field strengths or coherence lengths in astrophysical neutrino sources if directional data are combined with energy spectra.
  • The approach could be tested in existing or planned detectors with angular resolution by searching for the predicted left-right interference pattern in recoil tracks.
  • If coherence is preserved over long distances, similar asymmetries might appear in other interaction channels or at higher energies where directional information remains accessible.

Load-bearing premise

The incoming neutrino arrives in a coherent superposition of left- and right-handed helicity states produced by spin oscillations, and this superposition remains intact until the scattering occurs.

What would settle it

Directional measurements of recoil particles in low-energy neutrino scattering events that show no azimuthal dependence despite the neutrino having traversed a region with a known magnetic field capable of inducing spin oscillations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22681 by Alexander I. Studenikin, Fedor M. Lazarev, Konstantin A. Kouzakov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The angular differential cross sections for elastic neutrino-proton scattering for different incident neutrino spin states. In the first row, the 3D plot presents the cross sections for fully unpolarized neutrinos (i) within the SM limits and (ii) taking into account the neutrino magnetic moments of 10−11µB, while the 2D density plot shows only the latter cross section. In the second row, the 3D plot compa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The angular differential cross sections for elastic neutrino scattering on a proton and the 40Ar and 132Xe nuclei in the case of transverse spin polarization of neutrinos. A neutrino magnetic moment of 10−11µB and the SM values of neutrino charge radii and anapole moments are taken into account. Standard Model Fully unpolarized neutrino with magnetic moment Transversely polarized neutrino with magnetic moment view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The double differential cross section (11) for elastic neutrino-electron scattering for different incident neutrino spin states. On the left is the νe case, and on the right is the νµ,τ case. 7 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A nonzero neutrino magnetic moment arises already in the minimally extended Standard Model with right-handed massive Dirac neutrinos. The well-known consequence of the neutrino magnetic moment is the phenomenon of neutrino spin oscillations in a magnetic field. It can manifest itself not only as a lack in the flux of active cosmic neutrinos arriving on Earth but also as characteristic features in low-energy neutrino elastic scattering processes. Following our approach developed earlier, in this work we study the influence of arbitrary spin-flavor state of incoming neutrino on low-energy neutrino scattering off different particles in a detector. We demonstrate that superposition of left- and right-handed helicity neutrino states gives rise to an azimuthal asymmetry in the angular distribution of the recoil momenta. We present numerical calculations for elastic neutrino scattering on electrons, protons and 40Ar and 132Xe nuclei, demonstrating the azimuthal-asymmetry effect. Our results indicate the unique potential of directional neutrino detection to observe the neutrino spin oscillations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that neutrino spin oscillations in an external magnetic field produce an arbitrary spin-flavor superposition of left- and right-handed helicity states. When such a neutrino scatters elastically at low energy, the interference between the weak amplitude for left-helicity and the electromagnetic amplitude for right-helicity neutrinos generates an azimuthal asymmetry in the angular distribution of recoil momenta. Numerical results are shown for scattering on electrons, protons, 40Ar and 132Xe, and the authors conclude that directional neutrino detectors could thereby observe spin oscillations.

Significance. If the coherence of the helicity superposition is preserved and the asymmetry survives realistic detector effects, the result would supply a distinctive, directional signature of a nonzero neutrino magnetic moment that is complementary to flux-suppression searches. The explicit calculations for several detector-relevant targets give the claim concrete phenomenological content.

major comments (2)
  1. [theoretical framework and incoming-state description] The interference term 2 Re(A_L^* A_R) that produces the azimuthal asymmetry requires a stable relative phase between the left- and right-helicity amplitudes at the scattering vertex. The manuscript states that an arbitrary spin-flavor superposition reaches the detector but supplies no estimate of the coherence length, no integration over turbulent or stochastic magnetic-field realizations, and no minimum field-uniformity requirement; without these, it is impossible to judge whether the predicted φ modulation survives propagation to a terrestrial detector.
  2. [numerical results for elastic scattering] The abstract asserts that numerical calculations demonstrate the azimuthal-asymmetry effect, yet the provided text contains neither the explicit differential cross sections, the integration procedure over recoil angles, nor any assessment of statistical or systematic uncertainties. Consequently it is not possible to determine whether the asymmetry remains observable once finite angular resolution, backgrounds, and event statistics are included.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract refers to 'our approach developed earlier' without a specific citation; adding the reference would help readers locate the prior formalism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [theoretical framework and incoming-state description] The interference term 2 Re(A_L^* A_R) that produces the azimuthal asymmetry requires a stable relative phase between the left- and right-helicity amplitudes at the scattering vertex. The manuscript states that an arbitrary spin-flavor superposition reaches the detector but supplies no estimate of the coherence length, no integration over turbulent or stochastic magnetic-field realizations, and no minimum field-uniformity requirement; without these, it is impossible to judge whether the predicted φ modulation survives propagation to a terrestrial detector.

    Authors: We agree that a stable relative phase between helicity components is essential for the interference term to generate the azimuthal asymmetry. Our manuscript considers the general case of an arbitrary spin-flavor superposition arriving at the detector, as is standard in theoretical treatments of neutrino spin oscillations. We do not provide a coherence-length estimate or average over stochastic field realizations because these quantities are highly dependent on the specific magnetic-field environment (e.g., astrophysical source or terrestrial laboratory conditions) and lie outside the scope of the present work, which focuses on the scattering signature itself. In a revised version we will add an explicit statement of this assumption together with a brief discussion of the field-uniformity conditions required for coherence to be preserved. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [numerical results for elastic scattering] The abstract asserts that numerical calculations demonstrate the azimuthal-asymmetry effect, yet the provided text contains neither the explicit differential cross sections, the integration procedure over recoil angles, nor any assessment of statistical or systematic uncertainties. Consequently it is not possible to determine whether the asymmetry remains observable once finite angular resolution, backgrounds, and event statistics are included.

    Authors: The numerical results are obtained from the differential cross section that includes the interference between the weak left-helicity and electromagnetic right-helicity amplitudes. We will insert the explicit analytic expression for this differential cross section and describe the numerical integration over recoil energy and polar angle that yields the azimuthal distribution. The presented plots illustrate the ideal-case asymmetry for the listed targets. We acknowledge that a quantitative evaluation of finite angular resolution, backgrounds, and required event statistics is necessary to assess real-world observability; we will add a qualitative discussion of these detector effects in the revised conclusions section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior approach; central asymmetry calculation remains independent

full rationale

The paper states it follows 'our approach developed earlier' for studying spin-flavor states in scattering, but the core demonstration—that a left-right helicity superposition produces azimuthal asymmetry via the interference term in the differential cross section—is a direct kinematic calculation using standard weak and electromagnetic amplitudes. No equations reduce the predicted asymmetry to a fitted parameter or to the input superposition by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The coherence assumption is an external premise rather than a derived output, leaving the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that neutrinos possess a nonzero magnetic moment in the minimally extended Standard Model and that spin oscillations occur in external magnetic fields; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neutrinos have a nonzero magnetic moment arising in the minimally extended Standard Model with right-handed Dirac neutrinos
    Explicitly stated in the opening sentence of the abstract as the origin of spin oscillations.
  • domain assumption Spin oscillations in a magnetic field produce a coherent superposition of left- and right-handed helicity states that reaches the detector
    Required for the azimuthal asymmetry to appear; invoked throughout the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1333 out tokens · 57429 ms · 2026-05-08T11:09:03.873455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kajita, Nobel lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neu- trino oscillations, Rev

    T. Kajita, Nobel lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neu- trino oscillations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 030501. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030501

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.030501 2016

  2. [2]

    A. B. McDonald, Nobel lecture: The sudbury neu- trino observatory: Observation of flavor change for so- lar neutrinos, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 030502. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030502

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.030502 2016

  3. [3]

    Drewes, The phenomenology of right handed neu- trinos, Int

    M. Drewes, The phenomenology of right handed neu- trinos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22 (2013) 1330019. doi:10.1142/S0218301313300191

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301313300191 2013

  4. [4]

    Fujikawa, R

    K. Fujikawa, R. E. Shrock, Magnetic moment of a mas- sive neutrino and neutrino-spin rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 963–966. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.963

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.45.963 1980

  5. [5]

    Cisneros, Effect of neutrino magnetic moment on solar neutrino observations, Astrophys

    A. Cisneros, Effect of neutrino magnetic moment on solar neutrino observations, Astrophys. Space Sci. 10 (1971) 87–92. doi:10.1007/BF00654607

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00654607 1971

  6. [6]

    V oloshin, Resonant helicity flip ofν e due to magnetic moment and dynamics of supernova, Phys

    M. V oloshin, Resonant helicity flip ofν e due to magnetic moment and dynamics of supernova, Phys. Lett. B 209 (1988) 360–364. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90963-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90963-x 1988

  7. [7]

    Akhmedov, Resonant amplification of neutrino spin ro- tation in matter and the solar neutrino problem, Phys

    E. Akhmedov, Resonant amplification of neutrino spin ro- tation in matter and the solar neutrino problem, Phys. Lett. B 213 (1988) 64–68. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91048-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91048-9 1988

  8. [8]

    C.-S. Lim, W. Marciano, Resonant spin - flavor precession of solar and supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 1368–1373. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.1368

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.1368 1988

  9. [9]

    Pulido, E

    J. Pulido, E. Akhmedov, Resonance spin flavor pre- cession and solar neutrinos, Astropart. Phys. 13 (2000) 227–244. doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(99)00121-8. arXiv:hep-ph/9907399

    work page doi:10.1016/s0927-6505(99)00121-8 2000

  10. [11]

    Akhmedov, J

    E. Akhmedov, J. Pulido, Distinguishing magnetic moment from oscillation solutions of the solar neu- trino problem with Borexino, Phys. Lett. B 529 (2002) 193–198. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01254-6. arXiv:hep-ph/0201089

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01254-6 2002

  11. [12]

    Buryak, P.D

    E. Akhmedov, J. Pulido, Solar neutrino oscillations and bounds on neutrino magnetic moment and solar magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B 553 (2003) 7–17. doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(02)03182-9.arXiv:hep-ph/0209192

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 2003

  12. [13]

    Giunti, A

    C. Giunti, A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic inter- actions: A window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 531–591. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.531

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.531 2015

  13. [14]

    Giunti, K

    C. Giunti, K. A. Kouzakov, Y .-F. Li, A. V . Lokhov, A. I. Studenikin, S. Zhou, Electromagnetic neutrinos in labora- tory experiments and astrophysics, Ann. Phys. 528 (2016) 198–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201500211

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201500211 2016

  14. [15]

    A. I. Studenikin, K. A. Kouzakov, The electromag- netic properties of the neutrino as a window to new physics, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 75 (2020) 379–397. doi:10.3103/S0027134920050215

    work page doi:10.3103/s0027134920050215 2020

  15. [16]

    Giunti, K

    C. Giunti, K. Kouzakov, Y . Li, A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic properties, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75 (2025) 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102122-023242. arXiv:2411.03122

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102122-023242 2025

  16. [17]

    Bernabéu, L

    J. Bernabéu, L. G. Cabral-Rosetti, J. Papavassiliou, J. Vi- dal, Charge radius of the neutrino, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 113012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.113012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.113012 2000

  17. [18]

    Bernabéu, J

    J. Bernabéu, J. Papavassiliou, J. Vidal, Observability of the neutrino charge radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 101802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.101802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.101802 2002

  18. [19]

    Bernabéu, J

    J. Bernabéu, J. Papavassiliou, J. Vidal, Erratum: Observ- ability of the neutrino charge radius [phys. rev. lett. 89, 101802 (2002)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 229902(E). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.229902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.229902 2002

  19. [20]

    Bernabéu, J

    J. Bernabéu, J. Papavassiliou, J. Vidal, The neutrino charge radius as a physical observ- able, Nucl. Phys. B 680 (2004) 450–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.12.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.12.025 2004

  20. [21]

    M. A. Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Momentum dependent flavor radiative corrections to the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering for the neutrino charge-radius determina- tion, J. High Energy Phys. 2024 (2024) 271. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)271

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)271 2024

  21. [22]

    Cadeddu, C

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, K. A. Kouzakov, Y . F. Li, A. I. Studenikin, Y . Y . Zhang, Neutrino charge radii from co- herent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.113010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.113010 2018

  22. [23]

    Cadeddu, C

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, K. A. Kouzakov, Y . F. Li, A. I. Studenikin, Y . Y . Zhang, Erratum: Neutrino charge radii from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering [phys. rev. d 98, 113010 (2018)], Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 059902(E). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.059902. 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.059902 2018

  23. [24]

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. S. Garcia, O. Sanders, M. Tórtola, J. W. F. Valle, Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (cevns) with liquid argon, J. High Energy Phys. 2020 (2020) 130. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)130

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)130 2020

  24. [25]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y . F. Li, E. Pic- ciau, Y . Y . Zhang, Physics results from the first co- herent observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in argon and their combination with cesium- iodide data, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015030. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.015030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.015030 2020

  25. [26]

    Bonet, et al

    H. Bonet, et al. (C. O. N. U. S. Collaboration), First upper limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties from the conus experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 813. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10722-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10722-1 2022

  26. [27]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y . F. Li, C. A. Ternes, Y . Y . Zhang, Im- pact of the dresden-ii and coherent neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and elec- troweak physics, J. High Energy Phys. 2022 (2022) 164. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)164

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)164 2022

  27. [28]

    Cadeddu, et al., SATURNE: Current status and physics potential, Int

    M. Cadeddu, et al., SATURNE: Current status and physics potential, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33 (2024) 2441011. doi:10.1142/S0218301324410118

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301324410118 2024

  28. [29]

    Monroe, P

    J. Monroe, P. Fisher, Neutrino backgrounds to dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 033007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.033007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.033007 2007

  29. [30]

    Vergados, H

    J. Vergados, H. Ejiri, Can solar neutrinos be a serious background in direct dark matter searches?, Nuclear Physics B 804 (2008) 144–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.06.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.06.004 2008

  30. [31]

    L. E. Strigari, Neutrino coherent scattering rates at direct dark matter detectors, New Journal of Physics 11 (2009) 105011. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105011

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105011 2009

  31. [32]

    Billard, E

    J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, L. Strigari, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 023524. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023524

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.023524 2014

  32. [33]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, New definition of the neutrino floor for direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 251802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.251802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.251802 2021

  33. [34]

    Grothaus, M

    P. Grothaus, M. Fairbairn, J. Monroe, Directional dark matter detection beyond the neutrino bound, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 055018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.055018 2014

  34. [35]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, A. M. Green, J. Billard, E. Figueroa- Feliciano, L. E. Strigari, Readout strategies for di- rectional dark matter detection beyond the neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 063518. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063518

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.063518 2015

  35. [36]

    Mayet, A

    F. Mayet, A. Green, J. Battat, J. Billard, N. Bozorgnia, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, B. Kavanagh, S. Lee, D. Loomba, J. Monroe, B. Morgan, C. O’Hare, A. Peter, N. Phan, S. Vahsen, A review of the discovery reach of directional dark matter detection, Physics Reports 627 (2016) 1–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.007 2016

  36. [37]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, B. J. Kavanagh, A. M. Green, Time- integrated directional detection of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 083011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.083011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.083011 2017

  37. [38]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, Can we overcome the neutrino floor at high masses?, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 063024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063024

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063024 2020

  38. [39]

    Aad and et

    M. Askins, et al. (Theia collaboration), Theia: an ad- vanced optical neutrino detector, The European Physical Journal C 80 (2020) 416. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020- 7977-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020- 2020

  39. [40]

    Z. Yang, J. Liu, H. Duyang, W. Guo, X. He, Y . Hu, T. Li, Z. Liu, W. Luo, X. Luo, W. Y . Ma, X. Tan, F. Zeng, Y . Zhang, First attempt of directionality reconstruction for atmospheric neutrinos in a large homogeneous liquid scintillator detector, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 052005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.052005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.052005 2024

  40. [41]

    Lisotti, et al., CYGνS: detecting solar neu- trinos with directional gas time projection chambers, The European Physical Journal C 84 (2024) 1021

    C. Lisotti, et al., CYGνS: detecting solar neu- trinos with directional gas time projection chambers, The European Physical Journal C 84 (2024) 1021. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13392-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13392-3 2024

  41. [42]

    Agafonova, et al

    N. Agafonova, et al. (NEWSdm collaboration), Discovery potential for directional dark matter detection with nuclear emulsions, The European Physical Journal C 78 (2018)

    2018

  42. [43]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6060-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6060-1

  43. [44]

    M. C. Marshall, M. J. Turner, M. J. H. Ku, D. F. Phillips, R. L. Walsworth, Directional detection of dark matter with diamond, Quantum Science and Technology 6 (2021) 024011. doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe5ed

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe5ed 2021

  44. [45]

    Bernabei, P

    R. Bernabei, P. Belli, F. Nozzoli, A. Incicchitti, Anisotropic scintillators for wimp direct detection: re- visited, The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields 28 (2003) 203–209. doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003- 01190-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003- 2003

  45. [46]

    Belli, et al., Measurements of ZnWO 4 anisotropic response to nuclear recoils for the ADAMO project, The European Physical Journal A 56 (2020) 83

    P. Belli, et al., Measurements of ZnWO 4 anisotropic response to nuclear recoils for the ADAMO project, The European Physical Journal A 56 (2020) 83. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00094-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00094-z 2020

  46. [47]

    New Dark Matter Detectors using DNA or RNA for Nanometer Tracking

    A. Drukier, K. Freese, A. Lopez, D. Spergel, C. Can- tor, G. Church, T. Sano, New Dark Matter Detectors using DNA or RNA for Nanometer Tracking (2012). arXiv:1206.6809

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  47. [48]

    Capparelli, G

    L. Capparelli, G. Cavoto, D. Mazzilli, A. Polosa, Di- rectional dark matter searches with carbon nanotubes, Physics of the Dark Universe 9-10 (2015) 24–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2015.08.002. 10

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2015.08.002 2015

  48. [49]

    directional dark matter searches with carbon nanotubes

    L. Capparelli, G. Cavoto, D. Mazzilli, A. Polosa, Cor- rigendum to “directional dark matter searches with carbon nanotubes” [phys. dark univ. 9–10 (2015) 24–30], Physics of the Dark Universe 11 (2016) 79–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2015.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2015.12.004 2015

  49. [50]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, V . G. Matsos, J. Newton, K. Smith, J. Hochstetter, R. Jaiswar, W. Kyaw, A. McNamara, Z. Kuncic, S. N. Grellscheid, C. Bœhm, Particle detection and tracking with dna, The European Physical Journal C 82 (2022) 306. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10264-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10264-6 2022

  50. [51]

    K. A. Kouzakov, F. M. Lazarev, A. I. Stu- denikin, Electromagnetic interactions in elastic neutrino-nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 035025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.035025. arXiv:2412.02169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.035025 2025

  51. [52]

    M. A. Corona, W. M. Bonivento, M. Cadeddu, N. Car- gioli, F. Dordei, New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from lux-zeplin dark matter search results, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 053001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.053001. 11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.053001 2023