pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22916 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

String theory in the infrared

Ivano Basile
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords string theoryswamplandeffective field theoryworldsheet analysisUV/IR relationsholographic boundsvacuum energyhigher-derivative terms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Worldsheet analysis shows string theory imposes UV/IR scaling relations on higher-derivative Wilson coefficients and vacuum energy that effective field theory cannot detect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines low-energy effective theories from string theory and claims they are constrained by universal scaling relations that emerge in species limits. A worldsheet analysis uncovers connections between higher-derivative operators and the vacuum energy that remain hidden when viewed through effective field theory alone. These connections produce parametric inequalities resembling holographic bounds. A sympathetic reader would care because the relations offer theoretical grounding for swampland ideas and point toward possible observable patterns in cosmology that could indicate string theory.

Core claim

A worldsheet analysis reveals that higher-derivative Wilson coefficients and the vacuum energy exhibit UV/IR relations which are invisible from the viewpoint of effective field theory, leading to parametric inequalities which take the form of holographic bounds.

What carries the argument

Worldsheet analysis in species limits that extracts universal UV/IR scaling relations linking higher-derivative Wilson coefficients to the vacuum energy in string-derived gravity theories.

If this is right

  • Effective theories of gravity from string theory obey universal scaling relations between infrared data that generic theories lack.
  • Higher-derivative Wilson coefficients are parametrically tied to the vacuum energy through UV/IR connections.
  • The resulting inequalities take the form of holographic bounds that constrain the landscape of low-energy string phases.
  • These features lend theoretical support to swampland-motivated phenomenological scenarios with potential cosmological signatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relations could distinguish string-derived models from generic quantum-gravity effective theories via precision measurements of Wilson coefficients in cosmological data.
  • Extending the worldsheet approach to broader classes of compactifications might generate additional testable bounds on early-universe parameters.
  • Because the relations are invisible in pure effective field theory, they suggest string theory supplies new constraints that observations of dark energy or inflation could probe indirectly.

Load-bearing premise

The worldsheet analysis in species limits accurately captures universal infrared data of string-derived effective theories and produces relations that remain valid beyond the specific setups considered.

What would settle it

A explicit computation in a concrete string compactification where the higher-derivative Wilson coefficients and vacuum energy fail to obey the predicted parametric scaling from the worldsheet relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22916 by Ivano Basile.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The three universal quantities in any gravitational EFT are the mass gap 𝑚, the gravitational cutoff ΛQG and the vacuum energy 𝑉. I will review the parametric UV/IR relations connecting these quantities that emerge from string theory via the worldsheet approach. where ≲ is the logical negation of the asymptotic relation ≫6 . String theory in the infrared. To pursue the search for UV/IR relations in string … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A depiction of the landscape of gravitational EFTs arising from string theory. The figure is meant to emphasize the sparse nature of the set of UV-consistent EFTs relative to the set of all gravitational EFTs, which is the main driving force behind many aspects of the swampland program. Summary of results. The main findings of the one-loop analysis of [17, 31], subsequently extended in [32] including argum… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The (low-energy expansions of the) zero-point and four-point amplitudes, defined in eq. (6), which extract the vacuum energy 𝑉 and the “internal free energy” 𝐹 (a probe of the gravitational cutoff ΛQG in closed-string perturbation theory. The tree-level (sphere) contribution to the vacuum amplitude vanishes, since it is related to the (on-shell) tree-level effective action on a flat background. This is an … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A depiction of the standard choice for the SL(2, Z) fundamental domain F, which parametrizes by a complex coordinate 𝜏 = 𝜏1 + 𝑖𝜏2 the moduli space M1 of conformal (equivalently complex) structures of a two-torus. 𝐹, as found in [17]. I now turn to the vacuum energy 𝑉, or scalar potential, which was studied with the same worldsheet approach in [31]. Extending the methodology outlined below, which was introd… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A cartoon of the possible species limits in string theory, in accord with the emergent string conjecture of [33]. The bounds in eqs. (18) and (20) suggest that our world might be located somewhat close to a decompactification limit. This was the conclusion of [47], which led to the dark dimension proposal. landscape in much sharper mathematical terms. As a result, the IR data of gravitational EFTs is manif… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

I briefly summarize a recent research program aiming to probe the landscape of low-energy phases of string theory from a global perspective. Borrowing conceptual lessons from the swampland program, I will discuss how the effective theories of gravity produced by low-energy string theory are far from generic; rather, their infrared data is connected by universal scaling relations which become non-trivial in species limits. In particular, a worldsheet analysis reveals that higher-derivative Wilson coefficients and the vacuum energy exhibit UV/IR relations which are invisible from the viewpoint of effective field theory, leading to parametric inequalities which take the form of holographic bounds. This lends a more solid theoretical support to swampland-motivated phenomenological scenarios, and to the broader hopes of extracting less direct, but empirically accessible, signatures of string theory from cosmological observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript summarizes a research program that employs worldsheet analysis in species limits to identify universal UV/IR scaling relations connecting higher-derivative Wilson coefficients and the vacuum energy in string-derived effective theories of gravity. These relations are presented as invisible to standard EFT reasoning and as yielding parametric inequalities that resemble holographic bounds, thereby lending theoretical support to swampland conjectures and suggesting possible cosmological signatures of string theory.

Significance. If the claimed relations hold with the asserted generality, the work would provide a concrete bridge between worldsheet string methods and low-energy data, offering a mechanism to constrain the string landscape from IR observables and strengthening the case for swampland-motivated phenomenology. The approach could open avenues for extracting string-theoretic predictions from cosmology, but its impact hinges on demonstrating that the relations are both rigorously derived and universal beyond the specific setups examined.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'a worldsheet analysis reveals' UV/IR relations and parametric inequalities is stated without any equations, derivations, or explicit computations. No section supplies the worldsheet correlators, species-limit scalings, or steps that produce the claimed relations for Wilson coefficients or vacuum energy, preventing verification of whether they follow rigorously or remain model-dependent.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the relations are 'universal' and 'invisible from the viewpoint of effective field theory' rests on the assumption that the chosen worldsheet regimes in species limits capture all relevant IR data for generic string-derived EFTs. No cross-checks, general derivation, or argument ruling out model-specific artifacts are provided to support extending the results beyond the concrete examples considered.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript is written as a brief summary of a research program; expanding it with at least one explicit worked example (e.g., a specific worldsheet computation and the resulting inequality) would substantially improve clarity and allow readers to assess the method.
  2. Terminology such as 'species limits' and 'holographic bounds' is used without a concise definition or reference to the precise parametric regime in which the inequalities are claimed to hold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our summary of the research program. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'a worldsheet analysis reveals' UV/IR relations and parametric inequalities is stated without any equations, derivations, or explicit computations. No section supplies the worldsheet correlators, species-limit scalings, or steps that produce the claimed relations for Wilson coefficients or vacuum energy, preventing verification of whether they follow rigorously or remain model-dependent.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and current manuscript text are high-level and do not contain the explicit worldsheet correlators or step-by-step derivations. This work is structured as a concise summary of an ongoing research program whose technical details appear in the cited papers. To address the concern, we will revise the manuscript by adding a brief outline of the key worldsheet analysis steps and species-limit scalings, together with precise references to the sections of the cited works where the full computations are carried out. This will enable verification while preserving the summary character of the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the relations are 'universal' and 'invisible from the viewpoint of effective field theory' rests on the assumption that the chosen worldsheet regimes in species limits capture all relevant IR data for generic string-derived EFTs. No cross-checks, general derivation, or argument ruling out model-specific artifacts are provided to support extending the results beyond the concrete examples considered.

    Authors: The claim of universality rests on the fact that the species limit is a general regime in perturbative string theory and that the relevant worldsheet CFT data are determined by the string spectrum rather than by model-specific details. The invisibility to standard EFT follows because the relations encode string-scale information not accessible from IR data alone. We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit general argument and at least one additional cross-check. In revision we will add a short paragraph outlining why the scaling relations follow from the structure of the worldsheet theory in the species limit and reference existing checks in related compactifications. We do not assert that the relations hold for arbitrary EFTs, only for those realized by string theory. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on worldsheet computations

full rationale

The paper summarizes a research program deriving UV/IR scaling relations for Wilson coefficients and vacuum energy via worldsheet analysis in species limits, yielding parametric inequalities resembling holographic bounds. These relations are presented as emerging from explicit worldsheet computations rather than being defined into the inputs or forced by self-citation chains. No equations or steps in the abstract reduce the claimed predictions to fitted parameters or prior self-referential results by construction. The universality claim for string-derived EFTs is an interpretive extension but does not exhibit the enumerated circular patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation) based on the provided text. The derivation chain remains independent of its target conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract; the summary relies on the prior swampland framework and worldsheet techniques without detailing new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1140 out tokens · 47037 ms · 2026-05-08T10:39:20.923910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The weak gravity conjecture in perturbative strings

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A summary of a proposed proof that the Weak Gravity Conjecture follows from the structure of perturbative bosonic string theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bachmaier, G

    M. Bachmaier, G. Dvali and J. S. Valbuena-Bermúdez, [arXiv:2510.05237 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Caron-Huot, Y

    S. Caron-Huot, Y. Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin, JHEP05(2023), 122 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)122 [arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)122 2023

  3. [3]

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, JHEP09(2011), 045 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)045 [arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2011)045 2011

  4. [4]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) no.9, 091402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.091402 [arXiv:2303.07358 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.091402 2023

  5. [5]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen and J. E. Santos, JHEP05(2024), 122 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)122 [arXiv:2403.00051 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)122 2024

  6. [6]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calderón-Infante, A. Castellano and A. Herráez, SciPost Phys.19(2025) no.4, 096 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.4.096 [arXiv:2501.14880 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.19.4.096 2025

  7. [7]

    G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, M. Kolanovic and F. Nitti, Phys. Rev. D65(2002), 024031 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.024031 [arXiv:hep-th/0106058 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.024031 2002

  8. [8]

    Veneziano, JHEP06(2002), 051 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/051 [arXiv:hep- th/0110129 [hep-th]]

    G. Veneziano, JHEP06(2002), 051 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/051 [arXiv:hep- th/0110129 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/051 2002

  9. [9]

    Dvali, Fortsch

    G. Dvali, Fortsch. Phys.58(2010), 528-536 doi:10.1002/prop.201000009 [arXiv:0706.2050 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201000009 2010

  10. [10]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi, Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 045027 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.045027 [arXiv:0710.4344 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.045027 2008

  11. [11]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. Lust, Fortsch. Phys.58(2010), 505-527 doi:10.1002/prop.201000008 [arXiv:0912.3167 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201000008 2010

  12. [12]

    Species and Strings

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, [arXiv:1004.3744 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  13. [13]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. Lust, Fortsch. Phys.61(2013), 768-778 doi:10.1002/prop.201300002 [arXiv:1206.2365 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201300002 2013

  14. [14]

    Caron-Huot and Y

    S. Caron-Huot and Y. Z. Li, JHEP02(2025), 115 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)115 [arXiv:2408.06440 [hep-th]]. 14 String theory in the infraredIvano Basile

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)115 2025

  15. [15]

    Valeixo Bento and J

    B. Valeixo Bento and J. F. Melo, JHEP05(2025), 212 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)212 [arXiv:2501.08230 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2025)212 2025

  16. [16]

    Blumenhagen, A

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou, JHEP10(2023), 145 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)145 [arXiv:2305.10490 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)145 2023

  17. [17]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile and G. Leone, JHEP12(2024), 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)111 [arXiv:2405.03683 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)111 2024

  18. [18]

    Lectures in quantum gravity.SciPost Phys

    I. Basile, L. Buoninfante, F. Di Filippo, B. Knorr, A. Platania and A. Tokareva, SciPost Phys. Lect.Notes98(2025),1doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.98[arXiv:2412.08690[hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.98 2025

  19. [19]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra and M. Wiesner, JHEP01(2025), 144 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)144 [arXiv:2405.00083 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2025)144 2025

  20. [20]

    Clunan, S

    T. Clunan, S. F. Ross and D. J. Smith, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004), 3447-3458 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/14/009 [arXiv:gr-qc/0402044 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/14/009 2004

  21. [21]

    P. A. Cano and Á. Murcia, JHEP08(2021), 042 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)042 [arXiv:2104.07674 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)042 2021

  22. [22]

    Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,

    A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa and D. H. Wu, [arXiv:2507.03090 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, JHEP02(2016), 020 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)020 [arXiv:1407.5597 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)020 2016

  24. [24]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.6, 064076 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064076 [arXiv:1509.00851 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.064076 2016

  25. [25]

    Caron-Huot, Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Z. Komargodski, A. Sever and A. Zhiboedov, JHEP10(2017), 026 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)026 [arXiv:1607.04253 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)026 2017

  26. [26]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. Lüst and C. Montella, JHEP07(2024), 208 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)208 [arXiv:2311.12113 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)208 2024

  27. [27]

    Herráez, D

    A. Herráez, D. Lüst, J. Masias and M. Scalisi, SciPost Phys.18(2025), 083 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.3.083 [arXiv:2406.17851 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.3.083 2025

  28. [28]

    D. Lust, S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B808(2009), 1-52 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.09.012 [arXiv:0807.3333 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.09.012 2009

  29. [29]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999), 4971-4974 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4971 [arXiv:hep-th/9803132 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4971 1999

  30. [30]

    R.Bousso,JHEP07(1999),004doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004[arXiv:hep-th/9905177 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 1999

  31. [31]

    Basile and D

    I. Basile and D. Lust, Fortsch. Phys.73(2025) no.4, 2400265 doi:10.1002/prop.202400265 [arXiv:2409.12231 [hep-th]]. 15 String theory in the infraredIvano Basile

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.202400265 2025

  32. [32]

    UV/IR relations from the worldsheet,

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile, G. Leone and M. Lotito, [arXiv:2603.11157 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    S. J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, JHEP02(2022), 190 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)190 [arXiv:1910.01135 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)190 2022

  34. [34]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D61(2000), 104011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.104011 [arXiv:hep-th/9910056 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.104011 2000

  35. [36]

    Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter,

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind, Phys. Lett. B171(1986), 383-389 doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(86)91425-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1986

  36. [37]

    Kitazawa, Phys

    N. Kitazawa, Phys. Lett. B660(2008), 415-421 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.028 [arXiv:0801.1702 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.028 2008

  37. [38]

    Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry

    G. Leone and S. Raucci, [arXiv:2509.24703 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [39]

    Ooguri and Y

    H. Ooguri and Y. Wang, JHEP12(2024), 154 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)154 [arXiv:2405.00674 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)154 2024

  39. [40]

    Stout, [arXiv:2208.08444 [hep-th]]

    J. Stout, [arXiv:2208.08444 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  40. [41]

    Hellerman, JHEP08(2011), 130 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)130 [arXiv:0902.2790 [hep- th]]

    S. Hellerman, JHEP08(2011), 130 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)130 [arXiv:0902.2790 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2011)130 2011

  41. [42]

    Hellerman and C

    S. Hellerman and C. Schmidt-Colinet, JHEP08(2011), 127 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)127 [arXiv:1007.0756 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2011)127 2011

  42. [43]

    Benjamin, S

    N. Benjamin, S. Collier, A. L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney and E. Perlmutter, JHEP09(2021), 174 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)174 [arXiv:2107.10744 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2021)174 2021

  43. [44]

    Aoufia, A

    C. Aoufia, A. Castellano and L. Ibáñez, JHEP02(2026), 203 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)203 [arXiv:2506.03253 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)203 2026

  44. [45]

    Mangano, M

    I. Antoniadis, S. Dimopoulos and A. Giveon, JHEP05(2001), 055 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2001/05/055 [arXiv:hep-th/0103033 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126- 2001

  45. [46]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust, Fortsch. Phys.73(2025) no.8, e70015 doi:10.1002/prop.70015 [arXiv:2501.11690 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.70015 2025

  46. [47]

    Montero, C

    M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela, JHEP02(2023), 022 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)022 [arXiv:2205.12293 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2023)022 2023

  47. [48]

    Averaging over Narain moduli space

    A. Maloney and E. Witten, JHEP10(2020), 187 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)187 [arXiv:2006.04855 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2020)187 2020

  48. [49]

    Mirzakhani, J

    M. Mirzakhani, J. Diff. Geom.94(2013) no.2, 267-300 [arXiv:1012.2167 [math.GN]]. 16 String theory in the infraredIvano Basile

    work page arXiv 2013

  49. [50]

    M.Etheredge, B.Heidenreich, J.McNamara, T.Rudelius, I.RuizandI.Valenzuela, JHEP12 (2023), 182 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)182 [arXiv:2306.16440 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)182 2023

  50. [51]

    Alice in Warpland: KK modes, Warped Compactifications and the Swampland

    S. Raucci, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, [arXiv:2603.11163 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez, JHEP08(2022), 217 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)217 [arXiv:2112.10796 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)217 2022

  52. [53]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez, JHEP06(2023), 047 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)047 [arXiv:2212.03908 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)047 2023

  53. [54]

    Cribiori and F

    N. Cribiori and F. Tonioni, JHEP02(2026), 035 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)035 [arXiv:2507.02738 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)035 2026

  54. [55]

    A domain wall bound on anti-de Sitter vacua,

    N. Cribiori, A. Paraskevopoulou and T. Van Riet, [arXiv:2603.08779 [hep-th]]. 17

    work page arXiv