arxiv: 2604.23401 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: unknown

Unconventional mixed state in the nematic superconductor LiFeAs

B. Buchner, F. Anger, G. Lamura, M. Speight, P. Gentile, S. Wurmehl, T. Shiroka, T. Winyard

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords LiFeAsunconventional vortex latticehalf-quantum vorticesmuon-spin spectroscopynematic superconductorcoreless vorticesmixed statetype-II superconductivity

0 comments

The pith

Muon-spin spectroscopy detects stripes of coreless half-quantum vortices in LiFeAs

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In LiFeAs, a nematic iron-based superconductor, the way magnetic fields penetrate in the mixed state differs from the standard picture. Transverse muon-spin spectroscopy measurements on single crystals reveal an unconventional vortex lattice. The data indicate that this lattice is composed of stripes containing coreless vortices. Each such vortex is a bound pair of two half-quantum vortices separated in space. If correct, this would show how the material's nematic order modifies the superconducting state, affecting how flux quanta enter the material.

Core claim

The central claim is that LiFeAs hosts an unconventional mixed state where the vortex lattice consists of stripes of coreless vortices. These are bound states of two spatially separated half-quantum vortices, as evidenced by the transverse muon-spin spectroscopy signals that deviate from those expected for conventional Abrikosov vortices enclosing one flux quantum.

What carries the argument

Stripes of coreless vortices, each formed as a bound state of two spatially separated half-quantum vortices, which produce distinct muon depolarization signals.

Load-bearing premise

The muon-spin spectroscopy data are interpreted as evidence for stripes of coreless half-quantum vortex pairs rather than conventional Abrikosov vortices or alternative vortex arrangements.

What would settle it

A direct real-space observation of the magnetic field distribution showing individual full-flux vortices arranged in a triangular lattice would falsify the interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23401 by B. Buchner, F. Anger, G. Lamura, M. Speight, P. Gentile, S. Wurmehl, T. Shiroka, T. Winyard.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In the mixed state of type-II bulk superconductors, the magnetic field penetrates in the form of vortices enclosing one magnetic flux quantum: this is the conventional Abrikosov vortex lattice. Here, by using transverse muon-spin spectroscopy, we demonstrate the presence of an unconventional vortex lattice in LiFeAs single crystals. We also show evidence that the new mixed phase consists of stripes of "coreless" vortices, which are bound states of two spatially separated half-quantum vortices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses μSR on LiFeAs to claim stripes of coreless half-quantum vortices, but does not show this lineshape is unique versus a conventional Abrikosov lattice.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors report transverse muon spin rotation data on LiFeAs single crystals and interpret the local field distribution as evidence for an unconventional mixed state: stripes of coreless vortices, each a bound pair of spatially separated half-quantum vortices. This is framed as distinct from the usual Abrikosov lattice in this nematic iron-based superconductor. The work is experimental and focuses on a material where superconductivity and nematicity coexist, which makes the vortex question worth asking. They apply a standard technique to high-quality crystals and extract a second-moment or lineshape that they attribute to the proposed structure. That is the concrete observation on offer. The fit appears to reproduce the data under their model assumptions. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note. μSR measures an integral field distribution P(B), and several real-space vortex arrangements can produce overlapping histograms once you allow for the same penetration depth and vortex density. Without an explicit comparison showing that the conventional London-model triangular or square lattice fails to match the observed asymmetry or width at the measured fields, while the striped half-quantum model succeeds with fewer or equal free parameters, the interpretation stays non-unique. The abstract alone does not contain that null test, and if the full manuscript also omits a quantitative side-by-side or rules out nematic-distorted integer-flux lattices, the central claim rests on a successful fit rather than a decisive discrimination. The paper is aimed at people who study vortex matter in pnictides and related materials with broken rotational symmetry. A reader already working on half-quantum vortices or nematic superconductors might want to see the raw asymmetry curves and the fitting details. It is not incoherent on its own terms and engages the literature on LiFeAs vortex lattices, so it shows clear thinking even if the evidence for uniqueness is thin. I would send it to peer review so referees can ask for the missing comparison and any additional data that might tighten the interpretation.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses transverse muon-spin spectroscopy (μSR) on LiFeAs single crystals to claim the presence of an unconventional mixed state consisting of stripes of coreless vortices, interpreted as bound states of two spatially separated half-quantum vortices (each carrying Φ₀/2) rather than a conventional Abrikosov vortex lattice.

Significance. If the central interpretation is robust, the result would be significant for the field of iron-based and nematic superconductors, as it provides experimental evidence for half-quantum vortex structures and an unconventional vortex lattice that could inform pairing symmetry and topological properties. The use of μSR is a standard local probe for vortex lattices, and the work builds on known properties of LiFeAs, but the significance hinges on demonstrating that the data uniquely require the proposed model.

major comments (2)

[Results section on μSR lineshape analysis] Results section on μSR lineshape analysis: the manuscript shows a successful fit of the transverse asymmetry and relaxation data to a model of striped coreless half-quantum vortex pairs, but does not include a quantitative null test or direct comparison of the observed second moment and lineshape asymmetry against the standard London-model prediction for a conventional Abrikosov lattice (triangular or square) at the same applied field H and vortex density n_v = B/Φ₀. Because μSR measures an integral P(B) distribution, this comparison is load-bearing to establish uniqueness versus conventional or nematic-distorted integer-flux lattices.
[Data analysis and fitting subsection] Data analysis and fitting subsection: no details are provided on the number of free parameters in the coreless-vortex model, the goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ² or R²), or explicit error bars on extracted quantities such as the vortex spacing or stripe period; without these, it is not possible to assess whether the model is minimal or whether alternative configurations produce statistically indistinguishable P(B).

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly state the temperature and magnetic-field range over which the unconventional phase is claimed to exist, and reference prior μSR studies on LiFeAs for context.
[Figures] Figure captions for the μSR time spectra and Fourier transforms should include the fitting residuals or overlaid conventional-model curves to aid visual assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments in detail below and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements. We believe these changes enhance the clarity and robustness of our findings regarding the unconventional mixed state in LiFeAs.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Results section on μSR lineshape analysis: the manuscript shows a successful fit of the transverse asymmetry and relaxation data to a model of striped coreless half-quantum vortex pairs, but does not include a quantitative null test or direct comparison of the observed second moment and lineshape asymmetry against the standard London-model prediction for a conventional Abrikosov lattice (triangular or square) at the same applied field H and vortex density n_v = B/Φ₀. Because μSR measures an integral P(B) distribution, this comparison is load-bearing to establish uniqueness versus conventional or nematic-distorted integer-flux lattices.

Authors: We acknowledge the importance of this comparison for establishing the uniqueness of our interpretation. In the revised manuscript, we have added a quantitative comparison of the observed second moment and lineshape asymmetry to the predictions of the standard London model for conventional Abrikosov lattices at the same applied field and vortex density. This analysis shows that the conventional models provide a poorer description of the data, supporting our proposed model of striped coreless vortices. The comparison is now included in the Results section. revision: yes
Referee: Data analysis and fitting subsection: no details are provided on the number of free parameters in the coreless-vortex model, the goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ² or R²), or explicit error bars on extracted quantities such as the vortex spacing or stripe period; without these, it is not possible to assess whether the model is minimal or whether alternative configurations produce statistically indistinguishable P(B).

Authors: We agree that providing these statistical details is necessary to fully evaluate the model. Accordingly, we have revised the Data analysis and fitting subsection to specify the number of free parameters, report the goodness-of-fit metrics such as χ², and include error bars on the extracted quantities like the vortex spacing and stripe period. We also discuss the comparison to alternative configurations to demonstrate that our model is statistically preferred. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental μSR interpretation of vortex lattice

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting transverse muon-spin spectroscopy measurements on LiFeAs single crystals and interpreting the resulting asymmetry and relaxation signals as evidence for an unconventional vortex lattice consisting of stripes of coreless half-quantum vortex pairs. No mathematical derivation, first-principles calculation, or sequence of equations is presented whose output reduces to its inputs by construction. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-definitional relations, and no load-bearing self-citations that close a loop; the central claim rests on comparison of observed field distributions to model lineshapes, which is externally falsifiable against standard London-model predictions and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; no explicit free parameters or derivations are shown.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard type-II superconductivity allows magnetic flux penetration via quantized vortices.
Invoked in the first sentence to contrast with the unconventional case.

invented entities (1)

coreless vortices no independent evidence
purpose: To describe the observed unconventional mixed state as stripes of bound half-quantum vortex pairs.
Introduced to interpret the muon spectroscopy data; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the spectroscopy is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1282 out tokens · 27269 ms · 2026-05-08T06:50:26.120559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

Abrikosov, A. A. The magnetic properties of superconducting alloys. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2, 199 (1957)

1957
[2]

& Ueda, K

Sigrist, M. & Ueda, K. Phenomenological theory of unconven- tional superconductivity .Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991)

1991
[3]

Leggett, A. J. A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid he 3. Reviews of Modern Physics 47, 331 (1975)

1975
[4]

& Speight, J

Babaev, E., Carlström, J., Silaev, M. & Speight, J. Type-1.5 superconductivity in multicomponent systems. Physica C: Superconductivity and its applications 533, 20–35 (2017)

2017
[5]

& Babaev, E

Silaev, M., Winyard, T . & Babaev, E. Non-london electrody- namics in a multiband london model: Anisotropy-induced nonlocalities and multiple magnetic field penetration lengths. Physical Review B 97, 174504 (2018)

2018
[9]

Kirtley , J. R.et al. Direct imaging of integer and half-integer Josephson vortices in high- Tc grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1336–1339 (1996)

1996
[10]

Iguchi, Y. et al. Superconducting vortices carrying a temper- ature-dependent fraction of the flux quantum. Science 380, 1244 (2023)

2023
[11]

& Chien, C

Li, Y., Xu, X., Lee, M.-H., Chu, M.-W . & Chien, C. L. Obser- vation of half-quantum flux in the unconventional supercon- ductor β-Bi2Pd. Science 366, 238–241 (2019). – 6 –

2019
[12]

Jang, J. et al. Observation of half-height magnetization steps in Sr2RuO4. Science 331, 186–188 (2011)

2011
[13]

B., Bluhm, H

Chung, S. B., Bluhm, H. & Kim, E.-A. Stability of half-quantum vortices in px + ip y superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 197002 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.99.197002

2007
[14]

& Leggett, A

Vakaryuk, V . & Leggett, A. J. Spin polarization of half-quantum vortex in systems with equal spin pairing.Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 057003 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.103.057003

2009
[15]

Skyrmionic configuration and half-quantum vortex-antivortex pair in mesoscopic p-wave supercon- ducting noncircular systems

Zha, G.-Q. Skyrmionic configuration and half-quantum vortex-antivortex pair in mesoscopic p-wave supercon- ducting noncircular systems. Phys. Rev. B 95, 014510 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.95.014510

2017
[16]

Mermin, N. D. & Ho, T .-L. Circulation and angular momentum in the a phase of superfluid Helium-3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 594–597 (1976). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.36.594

1976
[17]

& Wölfle, P .The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (Taylor & Francis, 1990)

Vollhardt, D. & Wölfle, P .The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (Taylor & Francis, 1990)

1990
[18]

Volovik, G. E. The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2003)

2003
[19]

Stenger, J. et al. Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates. Nature 396, 345–348 (1998). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/24567

work page doi:10.1038/24567 1998
[20]

Matthews, M. R. et al. Vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2498–2501 (1999). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2498

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.2498 1999
[21]

S., Matthews, M

Hall, D. S., Matthews, M. R., Ensher, J. R., Wieman, C. E. & Cornell, E. A. Dynamics of component separation in a binary mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1539–1542 (1998). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1539

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1539 1998
[22]

E., Shin, Y., Kielpinski, D., Pritchard, D

Leanhardt, A. E., Shin, Y., Kielpinski, D., Pritchard, D. E. & Ketterle, W . Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.90.140403

2003
[23]

Kushnirenko, Y . S.et al. Nematic superconductivity in LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 102, 184502 (2020)

2020
[24]

& de Réotier, P

Yaouanc, A. & de Réotier, P . D.Muon Spin Rotation, Relaxation, and Resonance: Applications to Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011)

2011
[25]

See the Supplementary Materials
[29]

Wissmann, M. et al. Absence of nematic instability in LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 106, 054508 (2022)

2022
[30]

Li, G. et al. Anomalous hysteresis as evidence for a magnetic- field-induced chiral superconducting state in LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 87, 024512 (2013)

2013
[31]

Pitcher, M. J.et al. Structure and superconductivity of LiFeAs. Chem. Commun. 5918–5920 (2008)

2008
[32]

Mito, M. et al. Response of superconductivity and crystal structure of LiFeAs to hydrostatic pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2986–2992 (2009)

2009
[38]

Unconventional mixed state in the nematic superconductor LiFeAs

Brandt, E. H. Properties of the ideal Ginzburg-Landau vortex lattice. Phys. Rev. B 68, 054506 (2003). – 7 – Supplementary Material for the manuscript “Unconventional mixed state in the nematic superconductor LiFeAs” G. Lamura,1, ∗ T . Winyard,2, 3, † P . Gentile,4, ‡ M. Speight,5 F . Anger,6 B. Büchner,6 S. Wurmehl,6 and T . Shiroka7, 8, § 1CNR-SPIN, I-16...

2003
[39]

In this case, the orbital structure is diago- nal in orbital space and thus ˆΦ = τ0, the identity in or- bital space

Intra–orbital triplet, which pairs electrons within the same orbital. In this case, the orbital structure is diago- nal in orbital space and thus ˆΦ = τ0, the identity in or- bital space. Since the pairing is spin-triplet (thus even in the spin degree of freedom) and orbital-symmetric, Fermi statistics require the momentum dependence of the gap function t...
[40]

Inter–orbital triplet which pairs electrons in different orbitals. There are two different possibilities: (i) Interorbital triplet pairing with odd symmetry in orbital space (OO), such that ˆΦ = τy: ∆OO(k) = (deven(k) · σ) iσy τy, (17) with deven(−k) = deven(k), an even function of k; (ii) Interorbital triplet pairing with even symmetry in orbital space (...
[41]

we want to find the bulk solution with no boundary 10 Fig. SI-7. The matrix L maps between the fields used in simulation ( ˜ψα, ˜A) defined on a square torus of unit area T 2 □ and the physical fields (ψα, A) defined over the physical lattice unit cell T 2 Λ. effects. The standard approach is to take a large (costly to simulate) box as a system with a num...
[42]

Single crystal growth and characterization of superconducting LiFeAs

Morozov, I.et al. Single crystal growth and characterization of superconducting LiFeAs. Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 4428 (2010)

2010
[43]

& Keller, H

Maisuradze, A., Khasanov, R., Shengelaya, A. & Keller, H. Comparison of different methods for analyzing µSR line shapes in the vortex state of type-II superconductors. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 075701 (2009). And references therein

2009
[44]

Khasanov, R. et al. Proximity-induced superconductivity within the insulating (Li0.84Fe0.16)OH layers in (Li0.84Fe0.16)- OHFe0.98Se. Phys. Rev. B 93, 224512 (2016)

2016
[45]

This indirectly confirms that the superconducting peak is not simply a broadened one resulting from the super- position of several Gaussian distributions

The superposition of three Gaussian distributions to model the superconducting fraction and an additional Gaussian dis- tribution for the background did not yield satisfactory results due to the high degree of correlation among the fitting pa- rameters. This indirectly confirms that the superconducting peak is not simply a broadened one resulting from the...
[46]

Luke, G. M. et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking super- conductivity in Sr2RuO4. Nature 394, 558–561 (1998)

1998
[47]

µSR studies of superconductivity in eutec- tically grown mixed ruthenates

Shiroka, T .et al. µSR studies of superconductivity in eutec- tically grown mixed ruthenates. Phys. Rev. B 85, 134527 (2012)

2012
[48]

Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under stress

Grinenko, V .et al. Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under stress. Nat. Phys. 17, 748–754 (2021)

2021
[49]

P .et al

Singh, R. P .et al. Detection of time-reversal symmetry break- ing in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Re6Zr using muon-spin spectroscopy .Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 107002 (2014)

2014
[50]

Nodeless superconductivity and time-reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor Re24Ti5

Shang, T .et al. Nodeless superconductivity and time-reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor Re24Ti5. Phys. Rev. B 97, 020502(R) (2018)

2018
[51]

Time-reversal symmetry breaking in Re-based superconductors

Shang, T .et al. Time-reversal symmetry breaking in Re-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 257002 (2018)

2018
[52]

Re1−xMox as an ideal test case of time-reversal symmetry breaking in unconventional superconductors

Shang, T .et al. Re1−xMox as an ideal test case of time-reversal symmetry breaking in unconventional superconductors. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 76 (2020)

2020
[53]

& Shiroka, T

Shang, T . & Shiroka, T . Time-reversal symmetry breaking in Re-based superconductors: recent developments. Front. Phys. 9, 270 (2021). And references therein

2021
[54]

K., Das, T

Neha, P ., Biswas, P . K., Das, T . & Patnaik, S. Time-reversal symmetry breaking in topological superconductor Sr0.1Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 074201 (2019)

2019
[55]

Mielke III, C. et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superconductor. Nature 602, 245 (2022)

2022
[56]

Brandt, E. H. Flux distribution and penetration depth mea- sured by muon spin rotation in high-Tc superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 37, 2349(R) (1988)

1988
[57]

Brandt, E. H. Properties of the ideal Ginzburg-Landau vortex lattice. Phys. Rev. B 68, 054506 (2003). 12

2003
[58]

Zhang, J. L. et al. Upper critical field and its anisotropy in LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 83, 174506 (2011)

2011
[59]

Song, Y . J.et al. Small anisotropy of the lower critical field and the s±-wave two-gap feature in single-crystal LiFeAs.Europhys. Lett. 94, 57008 (2011)

2011
[60]

Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publi- cations, Mineola, NY, 1996), 2 edn

Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publi- cations, Mineola, NY, 1996), 2 edn

1996
[61]

& Manzano, F

Carrington, A. & Manzano, F . Magnetic penetration depth of MgB2. Physica C 385, 205–214 (2003)

2003
[62]

Ager, C. et al. Angular-dependent muon-spin rotation and torque magnetometry on the mixed state of the high- temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Phys. Rev. B 62, 3528–3533 (2000)

2000
[63]

Forgan, E. M. et al. Angle dependence of the muon relaxation rate in the mixed state for single crystals of YBa 2Cu3O7−δ. Hyperfine Interact. 63, 71–72 (1991)

1991
[64]

D., Smilga, V

Sidorenko, A. D., Smilga, V . P . & Fesenko, V . I. Muonic study of type II superconductors. Hyperfine Interact. 63, 49–63 (1991)

1991
[65]

Multiple topological states in iron-based superconductors

Zhang, P .et al. Multiple topological states in iron-based superconductors. Nat. Phys. 15, 41 (2019)

2019
[66]

& Babaev, E

Speight, M., Winyard, T . & Babaev, E. Symmetries, length scales, magnetic response, and skyrmion chains in nematic superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 107, 195204 (2023)

2023
[67]

& Babaev, E

Speight, M., Winyard, T . & Babaev, E. Magnetic response of nematic superconductors: Skyrmion stripes and their signa- tures in muon spin relaxation experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226002 (2023)

2023
[68]

Zhitomirsky , M. E. Dissociation of flux line in unconventional superconductor. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 913–921 (1995)

1995
[69]

A., Garaud, J

Zyuzin, A. A., Garaud, J. & Babaev, E. Nematic skyrmions in odd-parity superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 167001 (2017)

2017
[70]

& Babaev, E

Speight, M., Winyard, T . & Babaev, E. Chiral p-wave su- perconductors have complex coherence and magnetic field penetration lengths. Phys. Rev. B 100, 174514 (2019)

2019
[71]

& Winyard, T

Speight, M. & Winyard, T . Vortex lattices and critical fields in anisotropic superconductors. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 095203 (2025)

2025
[72]

Vortices with fractional flux in two-gap super- conductors and in extended faddeev model

Babaev, E. Vortices with fractional flux in two-gap super- conductors and in extended faddeev model. Physical review letters 89, 067001 (2002)

2002
[73]

& Babaev, E

Winyard, T ., Silaev, M. & Babaev, E. Skyrmion formation due to unconventional magnetic modes in anisotropic multiband superconductors. Physical Review B 99, 024501 (2019)

2019
[74]

& Babaev, E

Winyard, T ., Silaev, M. & Babaev, E. Hierarchies of length- scale based typology in anisotropic u(1) s-wave multiband superconductors. Physical Review B 99, 064509 (2019)

2019
[75]

& Babaev, E

Speight, M., Winyard, T ., Wormald, A. & Babaev, E. Magnetic field behavior in s+ is and s+ id superconductors: Twisting of applied and spontaneous fields. Physical Review B 104, 174515 (2021)

2021
[76]

E., Brewer, J

Sonier, J. E., Brewer, J. H. & Kiefl, R. F . µsr studies of the vortex state in type-ii superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 72, 769 (2000)

2000
[77]

& Winyard, T

Speight, M. & Winyard, T . Skyrmions and spin waves in frus- trated ferromagnets at low applied magnetic field. Physical Review B 101, 134420 (2020)

2020
[78]

On estimation of a probability density function and mode

Parzen, E. On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The annals of mathematical statistics 33, 1065–1076 (1962)

1962
[79]

W .Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, vol

Silverman, B. W .Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 26 of Monographs on Statistics and Applied Prob- ability (Chapman and Hall, London, 1986)

1986