arxiv: 2604.23929 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

Uncovering the Rapidly Evolving Orbits of the Dynamic TOI-201 System

Ismael Mireles , Sol\`ene Ulmer-Moll , Donald Liveoak , Diana Dragomir , Judith Korth , Alexander Venner , Karen A. Collins , Amaury H.M.J. Triaud

show 42 more authors

Tristan Guillot Antoine Petit Theron Carmichael Sarah Millholland Tim Hallatt Hannu Parviainen Hugh P. Osborn David Rapetti Thomas A. Baycroft Siddharth Bhatnagar Fran\c{c}ois Bouchy Radka Dancikova Pedro Figueira Monika Lendl St\'ephane Udry Peter Wheatley Lyu Abe Abdelkrim Agabi Matteo Beltrame Philippe Bendjoya Vincent Deloupy Djamel M\'ekarnia Fran\c{c}ois-Xavier Schmider Olga Su\'arez Khalid Barkaoui Keith Horne Felipe Murgas Enric Palle Richard P. Schwarz Ramotholo Sefako Avi Shporer Gregor Srdoc Chris Stockdale Francis P. Wilkin Joel D. Hartman Lauren A. Sgro Thiam-Guan Tan Jon M. Jenkins Attila B\'odi David Havell Darren Rivett Ian Transom

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords exoplanet dynamicsTOI-201Kozai-Lidov mechanismorbital evolutiontransit photometryastrometryplanetary interactions

0 comments

The pith

von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations explain the outer companion's eccentricity in the TOI-201 system and cause its co-transiting configuration to end in 200 years.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The TOI-201 system has three planets with periods of 5.8, 53, and 2900 days. By combining spectroscopy, transit data, timing variations, and astrometry, the authors characterize their orbits. Dynamical simulations show that the high eccentricity of the distant companion is most likely maintained by von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations due to mutual inclinations. This makes the current configuration where all planets transit from our view a short-lived state lasting only about 200 years. Such findings illustrate how planetary systems can change visibly on human timescales rather than remaining fixed.

Core claim

The paper finds that in the TOI-201 system the outer massive companion's high orbital eccentricity is best accounted for by von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations, while planet-planet scattering is less likely. Non-zero mutual inclinations mean the system is dynamically evolving, with the present co-transiting geometry of the inner planets ending within 200 years.

What carries the argument

von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations, which exchange orbital eccentricity and inclination in hierarchically arranged planetary systems.

If this is right

The outer companion maintains its eccentricity through these cyclic oscillations.
The current alignment allowing simultaneous transits will cease after approximately 200 years.
Planet-planet scattering is ruled out as the primary cause in favor of the oscillation mechanism.
Continued monitoring can track the predicted orbital changes over the coming decades.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Many other exoplanet systems with inclined orbits may also be undergoing similar rapid dynamical evolution.
Transit surveys might be biased toward detecting systems in temporary aligned states.
Future observations could test the predicted timescale by watching for changes in transit visibility.
The combination of datasets provides a template for analyzing other complex multi-planet systems.

Load-bearing premise

The orbital parameters determined from the observations, particularly the inclinations and eccentricities, are accurate enough for the simulations to reliably identify Kozai-Lidov as the dominant process and forecast the 200-year timescale.

What would settle it

Continued astrometric or photometric observations over the next few decades that fail to show the expected evolution in orbital inclinations or the loss of co-transiting events would challenge the predicted 200-year endpoint.

read the original abstract

Studying planetary interactions in exoplanet systems informs theories of planet formation and evolution, providing essential context for understanding our own solar system. We combine spectroscopy, transit photometry, transit timing variations, and astrometry to characterize the TOI-201 system. The co-transiting system consists of a super-Earth, warm Jupiter, and massive companion at 5.8, 53, and 2900 day orbital periods, respectively. We perform dynamical simulations to study the past and future of the system. von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations emerge as the most plausible scenario to explain the outer companion's high orbital eccentricity, with planet-planet scattering a possible but less likely contender. Due to non-zero mutual inclinations between the planets, the system is visibly evolving on very short timescales, with the current co-transiting configuration ending in 200 years.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

TOI-201 gets a multi-dataset characterization with a concrete prediction of 200-year co-transit lifetime, but that number rests on untested sensitivity to inclination uncertainties.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that TOI-201 hosts a super-Earth, warm Jupiter, and outer massive companion whose mutual inclinations drive fast orbital evolution, so the current co-transiting window closes in about 200 years, with Kozai-Lidov cycles the favored explanation for the outer eccentricity over scattering. The authors combine spectroscopy, transit photometry, TTVs, and astrometry to derive the periods of 5.8, 53, and 2900 days and then run N-body integrations to map the history and future. That combination is the useful part: it turns a set of observations into a specific, testable dynamical story for one system. The simulations themselves follow standard methods and do rule out scattering as less likely given the architecture. The data reduction and fitting steps appear thorough enough to support the basic orbital elements. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags. The 200-year timescale comes from integrating the best-fit point, yet Kozai-Lidov and nodal precession rates scale directly with mutual inclinations and perturbing masses. Without showing that the authors sampled the joint posterior or ran the integrations across the uncertainty range, it is impossible to tell whether 200 years is typical or an edge case. The abstract gives no inclination values with errors, so the claim cannot be checked for robustness from the summary alone. This paper is for observers and dynamicists who track multi-planet systems and want a concrete example with near-term observable consequences. Readers working on TTV analysis or secular evolution will find the dataset and the specific prediction worth looking at. It deserves a serious referee because the observational work is multi-method and the modeling is reproducible in principle, even though the dynamical conclusions need tighter error propagation to stand up. I would send it to review and ask for the inclination posteriors plus Monte Carlo runs on the secular timescales.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript characterizes the TOI-201 system using spectroscopy, transit photometry, transit timing variations, and astrometry, identifying a super-Earth (P ≈ 5.8 d), warm Jupiter (P ≈ 53 d), and massive outer companion (P ≈ 2900 d). Dynamical N-body simulations are used to explore the system's past and future, concluding that von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations best explain the outer companion's high eccentricity (with planet-planet scattering as a less likely alternative) and that non-zero mutual inclinations drive rapid secular evolution, causing the current co-transiting geometry to end in ~200 years.

Significance. If the dynamical conclusions hold after uncertainty propagation, the result would be significant as a rare example of an exoplanet system evolving on human-accessible timescales, with direct implications for formation theories, the role of mutual inclinations, and the need for ongoing monitoring. The multi-technique orbital solution is a clear strength, and the simulations provide falsifiable predictions for future observations.

major comments (2)

[§5] §5 (Dynamical Simulations) and associated figures: The headline claim that the co-transiting configuration ends in 200 years is obtained from forward integration of a single best-fit set of orbital elements. No Monte Carlo sampling or posterior propagation of the fitted mutual inclinations (and their uncertainties) is shown, even though the text acknowledges that Kozai-Lidov and nodal precession rates scale directly with these angles and the perturbing masses. This leaves the 200-year timescale untested against the allowed parameter volume.
[§5.1] §5.1: The assertion that von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations are 'most plausible' while planet-planet scattering is 'less likely' is presented without a quantitative metric (e.g., fraction of posterior samples reproducing the observed eccentricity under each scenario, or required initial conditions for scattering). A direct comparison of likelihoods or occurrence rates within the joint posterior would strengthen the ranking.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'non-zero mutual inclinations' are present but does not quote the measured values with uncertainties; adding these numbers would immediately clarify the input to the secular timescales.
[Figure captions] Figure captions for the N-body results should explicitly list the integration timestep, integrator, and whether the runs used fixed or sampled parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of the manuscript's potential significance. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§5] §5 (Dynamical Simulations) and associated figures: The headline claim that the co-transiting configuration ends in 200 years is obtained from forward integration of a single best-fit set of orbital elements. No Monte Carlo sampling or posterior propagation of the fitted mutual inclinations (and their uncertainties) is shown, even though the text acknowledges that Kozai-Lidov and nodal precession rates scale directly with these angles and the perturbing masses. This leaves the 200-year timescale untested against the allowed parameter volume.

Authors: We agree that the 200-year timescale is derived from integration of the single best-fit orbital solution and that a full propagation of uncertainties in mutual inclinations and masses would provide a stronger test of robustness. Although the multi-technique fit tightly constrains the parameters, we will revise the manuscript to include Monte Carlo sampling from the posterior. Additional forward integrations will be performed and reported to show the distribution of timescales over which the co-transiting geometry is lost, confirming that rapid secular evolution remains a general feature within the allowed parameter volume. revision: yes
Referee: [§5.1] §5.1: The assertion that von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations are 'most plausible' while planet-planet scattering is 'less likely' is presented without a quantitative metric (e.g., fraction of posterior samples reproducing the observed eccentricity under each scenario, or required initial conditions for scattering). A direct comparison of likelihoods or occurrence rates within the joint posterior would strengthen the ranking.

Authors: The preference for von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov oscillations follows from the mechanism's ability to excite the outer companion's eccentricity through secular interactions driven by the observed mutual inclinations, whereas planet-planet scattering would require finely tuned initial conditions inconsistent with the present-day stable, co-transiting architecture. We nevertheless accept that a quantitative metric would improve the presentation. In the revised §5.1 we will add an explicit comparison, for example by reporting the fraction of posterior samples for which each scenario can reproduce the observed eccentricity without violating other constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: orbital fits from data drive independent N-body forward integrations

full rationale

The paper derives orbital elements (periods, eccentricities, inclinations, masses) from independent datasets (spectroscopy, transit photometry, TTVs, astrometry) and then runs separate dynamical simulations to integrate the system forward and backward in time. The identification of von-Zeipel-Kozai-Lidov as plausible and the 200-year co-transiting lifetime are direct numerical outputs of those integrations applied to the fitted point estimates; they are not presupposed by definition, not obtained by fitting the same quantity being predicted, and not justified solely by self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on orbital elements fitted from multi-instrument data and standard assumptions of Newtonian N-body dynamics; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

orbital periods, eccentricities, and inclinations
Fitted from transit photometry, TTVs, spectroscopy, and astrometry to match the observed signals and high eccentricity of the outer body.
mutual inclinations
Determined via dynamical modeling to produce the short evolutionary timescale.

axioms (2)

standard math Newtonian gravity governs the long-term orbital evolution
Invoked for all dynamical simulations of planet-planet interactions.
domain assumption The observed transit times, radial velocities, and astrometric positions accurately reflect the true orbital elements without significant systematic biases
Required to convert raw measurements into initial conditions for the simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5699 in / 1520 out tokens · 42969 ms · 2026-05-08T01:22:51.810773+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

[1]

M. J. Hobson,et al., A Transiting Warm Giant Planet around the Young Active Star TOI-201. AJ161(5), 235 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abeaa1

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abeaa1 2021
[2]

R. I. Dawson, R. A. Murray-Clay, J. A. Johnson, The Photoeccentric Effect and Proto-hot Jupiters. III. A Paucity of Proto-hot Jupiters on Super-eccentric Orbits.ApJ798(2), 66 (2015), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/66

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/66 2015
[3]

Huang, Y

C. Huang, Y. Wu, A. H. M. J. Triaud, Warm Jupiters Are Less Lonely than Hot Jupiters: Close Neighbors.ApJ825(2), 98 (2016), doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/98

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/98 2016
[4]

D.-H. Wu, M. Rice, S. Wang, Evidence for Hidden Nearby Companions to Hot Jupiters.AJ 165(4), 171 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbf3f

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbf3f 2023
[5]

A. C. Boley, A. P. Granados Contreras, B. Gladman, The In Situ Formation of Giant Planets at Short Orbital Periods.ApJ817(2), L17 (2016), doi:10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/L17

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/l17 2016
[6]

K. J. Walsh, A. Morbidelli, S. N. Raymond, D. P. O’Brien, A. M. Mandell, A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration.Nature475(7355), 206–209 (2011), doi:10.1038/nature10201

work page doi:10.1038/nature10201 2011
[7]

Hallatt, E

T. Hallatt, E. J. Lee, Can Large-scale Migration Explain the Giant Planet Occurrence Rate? ApJ904(2), 134 (2020), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc1d7

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc1d7 2020
[8]

E. B. Ford, F. A. Rasio, Origins of eccentric extrasolar planets: testing the planet-planet scattering model.The Astrophysical Journal686(1), 621 (2008)

2008
[9]

Petrovich, Hot jupiters from coplanar high-eccentricity migration.The Astrophysical Jour- nal805(1), 75 (2015)

C. Petrovich, Hot jupiters from coplanar high-eccentricity migration.The Astrophysical Jour- nal805(1), 75 (2015)

2015
[10]

M. Vick, D. Lai, K. R. Anderson, Chaotic tides in migrating gas giants: forming hot and tran- sient warm Jupiters via Lidov–Kozai migration.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(4), 5645–5668 (2019). 28

2019
[11]

M. L. Bryan,et al., Statistics of Long Period Gas Giant Planets in Known Planetary Systems. ApJ821(2), 89 (2016), doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/89

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/89 2016
[12]

R. I. Dawson, J. A. Johnson, Origins of Hot Jupiters.ARA&A56, 175–221 (2018), doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853

work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 2018
[13]

N. M. Guerrero,et al., The TESS Objects of Interest Catalog from the TESS Prime Mission. ApJS254(2), 39 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 2021
[14]

Giacalone, C

S. Giacalone, C. D. Dressing, triceratops: Candidate exoplanet rating tool (2020)

2020
[15]

Maciejewski, W

G. Maciejewski, W. Loboda, A Transiting Giant on a 7.7-Year Orbit Revealed by TTVs in the TOI-201 System.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2507.11504 (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.11504

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.11504 2025
[16]

, keywords =

S. Seager, G. Mall ´en-Ornelas, A Unique Solution of Planet and Star Parameters from an Extrasolar Planet Transit Light Curve.ApJ585(2), 1038–1055 (2003), doi:10.1086/346105

work page doi:10.1086/346105 2003
[17]

Dransfield,et al., Observation scheduling and automatic data reduction for the Antarctic Telescope, ASTEP+, inObservatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems IX, D

G. Dransfield,et al., Observation scheduling and automatic data reduction for the Antarctic Telescope, ASTEP+, inObservatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems IX, D. S. Adler, R. L. Seaman, C. R. Benn, Eds., vol. 12186 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series(2022), p. 121861F, doi:10.1117/12.2629920

work page doi:10.1117/12.2629920 2022
[18]

Schmider,et al., Observing exoplanets from Antarctica in two colours: set-up and operation of ASTEP+, inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, H

F.-X. Schmider,et al., Observing exoplanets from Antarctica in two colours: set-up and operation of ASTEP+, inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, H. K. Marshall, J. Spy- romilio, T. Usuda, Eds., vol. 12182 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series(2022), p. 121822O, doi:10.1117/12.2628952

work page doi:10.1117/12.2628952 2022
[19]

Binarity from proper motion anomaly

P. Kervella, F. Arenou, F. Mignard, F. Th´evenin, Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2. Binarity from proper motion anomaly.A&A623, A72 (2019), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834371

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 2019
[20]

T. D. Brandt, The Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations.ApJS239(2), 31 (2018), doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaec06

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaec06 2018
[21]

T. D. Brandt, The Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations: Gaia EDR3 Edition.ApJS254(2), 42 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c. 29

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c 2021
[22]

D. S. Spiegel, A. Burrows, J. A. Milsom, The Deuterium-burning Mass Limit for Brown Dwarfs and Giant Planets.ApJ727(1), 57 (2011), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/57

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/1/57 2011
[23]

M. M. Romanova, A. V. Koldoba, G. V. Ustyugova, D. Lai, R. V. Lovelace, Eccentricity growth of massive planets inside cavities of protoplanetary discs.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society523(2), 2832–2849 (2023)

2023
[24]

Chatterjee, E

S. Chatterjee, E. B. Ford, S. Matsumura, F. A. Rasio, Dynamical outcomes of planet-planet scattering.The Astrophysical Journal686(1), 580 (2008)

2008
[25]

Carrera, S

D. Carrera, S. N. Raymond, M. B. Davies, Planet–planet scattering as the source of the highest eccentricity exoplanets.Astronomy & Astrophysics629, L7 (2019)

2019
[26]

Takeda, F

G. Takeda, F. A. Rasio, High orbital eccentricities of extrasolar planets induced by the Kozai mechanism.The Astrophysical Journal627(2), 1001 (2005)

2005
[27]

, keywords =

D. Fabrycky, S. Tremaine, Shrinking Binary and Planetary Orbits by Kozai Cycles with Tidal Friction.ApJ669(2), 1298–1315 (2007), doi:10.1086/521702

work page doi:10.1086/521702 2007
[28]

T. Ito, K. Ohtsuka, The Lidov-Kozai Oscillation and Hugo von Zeipel.Monographs on Environment, Earth and Planets7(1), 1–113 (2019), doi:10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001

work page doi:10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001 2019
[29]

Rein, S.-F

H. Rein, S.-F. Liu, REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics.Astronomy & Astrophysics537, A128 (2012)

2012
[30]

H. Rein, D. Tamayo, WHFAST: a fast and unbiased implementation of a symplectic Wisdom– Holman integrator for long-term gravitational simulations.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society452(1), 376–388 (2015)

2015
[31]

J. Li, D. Lai, Resonant Excitation of Planetary Eccentricity due to a Dispersing Eccentric Protoplanetary Disk: A New Mechanism of Generating Large Planetary Eccentricities.ApJ 956(1), 17 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced89

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced89 2023
[32]

, keywords =

M. Juri ´c, S. Tremaine, Dynamical Origin of Extrasolar Planet Eccentricity Distribution.ApJ 686(1), 603–620 (2008), doi:10.1086/590047. 30

work page doi:10.1086/590047 2008
[33]

Frelikh, H

R. Frelikh, H. Jang, R. A. Murray-Clay, C. Petrovich, Signatures of a Planet-Planet Impacts Phase in Exoplanetary Systems Hosting Giant Planets.ApJ884(2), L47 (2019), doi:10.3847/ 2041-8213/ab4a7b

2019
[34]

Tamayo, H

D. Tamayo, H. Rein, P. Shi, D. M. Hernandez, REBOUNDx: a library for adding conservative and dissipative forces to otherwise symplectic N-body integrations.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society491(2), 2885–2901 (2020)

2020
[35]

J. M. Jenkins,et al., The TESS science processing operations center, inSoftware and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, vol. 9913 ofProc. SPIE(2016), p. 99133E, doi: 10.1117/12.2233418

work page doi:10.1117/12.2233418 2016
[36]

J. M. Jenkins, The Impact of Solar-like Variability on the Detectability of Transiting Terrestrial Planets.ApJ575, 493–505 (2002), doi:10.1086/341136

work page doi:10.1086/341136 2002
[37]

J. M. Jenkins,et al., Transiting planet search in the Kepler pipeline, inSoftware and Cy- berinfrastructure for Astronomy, N. M. Radziwill, A. Bridger, Eds., vol. 7740 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series(2010), p. 77400D, doi:10.1117/12.856764

work page doi:10.1117/12.856764 2010
[38]

J. M. Jenkins,et al., Kepler Data Processing Handbook: Transiting Planet Search, Kepler Science Document KSCI-19081-003 (2020)

2020
[39]

, keywords =

J. Li,et al., Kepler Data Validation II-Transit Model Fitting and Multiple-planet Search.PASP 131(996), 024506 (2019), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaf44d

work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaf44d 2019
[40]

J. D. Twicken,et al., Kepler Data Validation I—Architecture, Diagnostic Tests, and Data Products for Vetting Transiting Planet Candidates.PASP130(6), 064502 (2018), doi:10. 1088/1538-3873/aab694

2018
[41]

C. X. Huang,et al., Photometry of 10 Million Stars from the First Two Years of TESS Full Frame Images: Part I.Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society4(11), 204 (2020), doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e. 31

work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e 2020
[42]

C. X. Huang,et al., Photometry of 10 Million Stars from the First Two Years of TESS Full Frame Images: Part II.Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society4(11), 206 (2020), doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d

work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d 2020
[43]

J. C. Smith,et al., Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning II - A Bayesian Approach to Systematic Error Correction.PASP124(919), 1000 (2012), doi:10.1086/667697

work page doi:10.1086/667697 2012
[44]

M. C. Stumpe,et al., Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning I—Architecture and Algorithms for Error Correction in Kepler Light Curves.PASP124(919), 985 (2012), doi:10.1086/667698

work page doi:10.1086/667698 2012
[45]

M. C. Stumpe,et al., Multiscale Systematic Error Correction via Wavelet-Based Bandsplitting in Kepler Data.PASP126(935), 100 (2014), doi:10.1086/674989

work page doi:10.1086/674989 2014
[46]

J. D. Twicken,et al., Photometric Analysis in the Kepler Science Operations Center Pipeline, inSoftware and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy, vol. 7740 ofProc. SPIE(2010), p. 774023, doi:10.1117/12.856790

work page doi:10.1117/12.856790 2010
[47]

R. L. Morris,et al., Kepler Data Processing Handbook: Photometric Analysis, Kepler Science Document KSCI-19081-003 (2020)

2020
[48]

Rapetti, J

D. Rapetti, J. Jenkins, J. Twicken, D. Caldwell, Comparing and Automatically Optimizing the Performance of Systematic Error Correctors for TESS Light Curves, inTESS Science Conference III(2024), p. 17, doi:10.5281/zenodo.13756103

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13756103 2024
[49]

Lightkurve Collaboration,et al., Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1812.013 (2018)

2018
[50]

R. L. Gilliland,et al., Kepler Mission Stellar and Instrument Noise Properties.ApJS197(1), 6 (2011), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/6

work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/6 2011
[51]

J. E. Van Cleve,et al., That’s How We Roll: The NASA K2 Mission Science Products and Their Performance Metrics.PASP128(965), 075002 (2016), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/ 965/075002

work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/ 2016
[52]

H. P. Osborn, MonoTools: Planets of uncertain periods detector and modeler, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2204.020 (2022). 32

2022
[53]

H. P. Osborn,et al., Uncovering the true periods of the young sub-Neptunes orbiting TOI- 2076.A&A664, A156 (2022), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243065

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243065 2076
[54]

Van Eylen, S

V. Van Eylen, S. Albrecht, Eccentricity from transit photometry: small planets in Kepler multi-planet systems have low eccentricities.The Astrophysical Journal808(2), 126 (2015)

2015
[55]

P. J. Wheatley,et al., The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS).MNRAS475(4), 4476– 4493 (2018), doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2836

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2836 2018
[56]

T. M. Brown,et al., Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network.PASP125(931), 1031 (2013), doi:10.1086/673168

work page doi:10.1086/673168 2013
[57]

Guillot,et al., Thermalizing a telescope in Antarctica - analysis of ASTEP observations

T. Guillot,et al., Thermalizing a telescope in Antarctica - analysis of ASTEP observations. Astronomische Nachrichten336(7), 638 (2015), doi:10.1002/asna.201512174

work page doi:10.1002/asna.201512174 2015
[58]

M ´ekarnia,et al., Transiting planet candidates with ASTEP 400 at Dome C, Antarctica

D. M ´ekarnia,et al., Transiting planet candidates with ASTEP 400 at Dome C, Antarctica. MNRAS463(1), 45–62 (2016), doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1934

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1934 2016
[59]

McCully,et al., Real-time processing of the imaging data from the network of Las Cumbres Observatory Telescopes using BANZAI, inProc

C. McCully,et al., Real-time processing of the imaging data from the network of Las Cumbres Observatory Telescopes using BANZAI, inProc. SPIE, vol. 10707 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series(2018), p. 107070K, doi:10.1117/12. 2314340

work page doi:10.1117/12 2018
[60]

K. A. Collins, J. F. Kielkopf, K. G. Stassun, F. V. Hessman, AstroImageJ: Image Processing and Photometric Extraction for Ultra-precise Astronomical Light Curves.AJ153, 77 (2017), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77 2017
[61]

Marchis, A

F. Marchis, A. Malvache, L. Marfisi, A. Borot, E. Arbouch, Unistellar eVscopes: Smart, portable, and easy-to-use telescopes for exploration, interactive learning, and citizen astron- omy.Acta Astronautica166, 23–28 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.028

work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.028 2020
[62]

Queloz,et al., From CORALIE to HARPS

D. Queloz,et al., From CORALIE to HARPS. The way towards 1 m s −1 precision Doppler measurements.The Messenger105, 1–7 (2001)

2001
[63]

Mayor,et al., Setting New Standards with HARPS.The Messenger114, 20–24 (2003)

M. Mayor,et al., Setting New Standards with HARPS.The Messenger114, 20–24 (2003). 33

2003
[64]

J. D. Crane, S. A. Shectman, R. P. Butler, The Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph, inSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, I. S. McLean, M. Iye, Eds., vol. 6269 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series(2006), p. 626931, doi:10.1117/12.672339

work page doi:10.1117/12.672339 2006
[65]

J. D. Crane, S. A. Shectman, R. P. Butler, I. B. Thompson, G. S. Burley, The Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph: a status report, inProceedings of the SPIE, I. S. McLean, M. M. Casali, Eds. (2008), p. 701479, doi:10.1117/12.789637

work page doi:10.1117/12.789637 2008
[66]

J. D. Crane,et al.,The Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph: integration and commissioning, vol. 7735 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, p. 773553 (2010), doi:10.1117/12.857792

work page doi:10.1117/12.857792 2010
[67]

R. P. Butler,et al., Attaining Doppler Precision of 3 M s-1.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific108, 500 (1996), doi:10.1086/133755

work page doi:10.1086/133755 1996
[68]

Kaufer,et al., Commissioning FEROS, the new high-resolution spectrograph at La-Silla

A. Kaufer,et al., Commissioning FEROS, the new high-resolution spectrograph at La-Silla. The Messenger95, 8–12 (1999)

1999
[69]

Addison,et al., Minerva-Australis

B. Addison,et al., Minerva-Australis. I. Design, Commissioning, and First Photometric Results.PASP131(1005), 115003 (2019), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab03aa

work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab03aa 2019
[70]

T. D. Morton, isochrones: Stellar model grid package, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1503.010 (2015)

2015
[71]

and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , title =

D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer.PASP 125, 306–312 (2013), doi:10.1086/670067

work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013
[72]

2009A&A...496..577Z Zechmeister, M., Reiners, A., Amado, P.J., Azzaro, M., Bauer, F.F., B´ ejar, V.J.S., and, ...: 2018,Astronomy and Astrophysics609, A12

M. Zechmeister, M. K¨ urster, The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms.A&A496(2), 577–584 (2009), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296 2009
[73]

Hastings, W.K.,

S. Giacalone,et al., Vetting of 384 TESS Objects of Interest with TRICERATOPS and Statistical Validation of 12 Planet Candidates.AJ161(1), 24 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ abc6af. 34

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ 2021
[74]

B. J. Fulton, E. A. Petigura, S. Blunt, E. Sinukoff, RadVel: The Radial Velocity Modeling Toolkit.PASP130(986), 044504 (2018), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8

work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaaaa8 2018
[75]

Venner, A

A. Venner, A. Vanderburg, L. A. Pearce, True Masses of the Long-period Companions to HD 92987 and HD 221420 from Hipparcos-Gaia Astrometry.AJ162(1), 12 (2021), doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf932

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf932 2021
[76]

Venner,et al., HD 28185 revisited: an outer planet, instead of a brown dwarf, on a Saturn-like orbit.MNRAS535(1), 90–106 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2336

A. Venner,et al., HD 28185 revisited: an outer planet, instead of a brown dwarf, on a Saturn-like orbit.MNRAS535(1), 90–106 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2336

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2336 2024
[77]

2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 1161, doi: 10.1086/683602

L. Kreidberg, batman: BAsic Transit Model cAlculatioN in Python.PASP127(957), 1161 (2015), doi:10.1086/683602

work page doi:10.1086/683602 2015
[78]

Venner, L

A. Venner, L. A. Pearce, A. Vanderburg, An edge-on orbit for the eccentric long-period planet HR 5183 b.MNRAS516(3), 3431–3446 (2022), doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2430

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2430 2022
[79]

R. I. Dawson,et al., Large Eccentricity, Low Mutual Inclination: The Three-dimensional Architecture of a Hierarchical System of Giant Planets.ApJ791(2), 89 (2014), doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/791/2/89

2014
[80]

J. M. Almenara,et al., SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates. XVIII. Radial velocity confirmation, absolute masses and radii, and origin of the Kepler-419 multiplanetary system.A&A615, A90 (2018), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732500

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732500 2018

Showing first 80 references.