pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24045 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Nuclear non-resonant photoexcitation assisted by electron recombination

Nan Xue , Zuoye Liu , Ziwen Li , Adriana P\'alffy , Jianmin Yuan , Yuanbin Wu , Xiangjin Kong , Yu-Gang Ma
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords nuclearnon-resonantx-raymechanismphotonsassistedelectronelectronic
0
0 comments X

The pith

A third-order nuclear excitation process via non-resonant photon absorption assisted by electron recombination through a virtual nuclear state is proposed and exemplified for the 14.2 keV transition in 193Pt.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors describe how a nucleus can absorb an x-ray photon whose energy does not exactly match a nuclear transition energy. An electron from the surrounding atomic shell recombines to supply the missing energy difference. This occurs through a temporary virtual state of the nucleus rather than through electronic states. The process resembles parametric up-conversion in nonlinear optics but is mediated by the nucleus. They focus on a 14.2 keV hard x-ray transition in platinum-193 that has not been observed before, driven by an x-ray free-electron laser. Although the calculated probability is low, the enormous number of photons in a laser pulse could make the effect observable. This mechanism is distinguished from the electronic bridge process because it relies on a virtual nuclear state. The work suggests new possibilities for nonlinear interactions between x-rays and nuclei.

Core claim

The nuclear non-resonant photoexcitation assisted by electron recombination is a viable third-order process proceeding via a virtual nuclear state that can be driven by x-ray free-electron lasers, as shown for the 14.2 keV transition in 193Pt where the small cross section is compensable by photon number.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the coupling between the nuclear transition and atomic shell is sufficient to enable a calculable third-order process with observable rates under x-ray laser conditions, without detailed verification of the virtual state treatment or cross-section computation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24045 by Adriana P\'alffy, Jianmin Yuan, Nan Xue, Xiangjin Kong, Yuanbin Wu, Yu-Gang Ma, Ziwen Li, Zuoye Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Sketch of the process of photoexcitation assisted by electron recombination and (b) partial level scheme of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average charge states +q of ions at different electron temperatures, obtained with the FLYCHK code [57]. We assume here that the electron density of the plasma is ne = 1024 cm−3 , which corresponds to a solid-state density. The initial electronic configuration before electron recombination is 3 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Reaction rates and resonance strengths view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The reaction rate as a function of the electron temperature for selected view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate theoretically a nuclear excitation mechanism involving absorption of non-resonant photons leveraged by the coupling to the atomic shell. The nuclear non-resonant photoexcitation is assisted by electron recombination which compensates the energy mismatch between photon and nuclear transition energies, reminiscent of parametric up-conversion in non-linear media. This third-order process proceeds via a virtual nuclear state rather than virtual electronic states, distinguishing this mechanism from the electronic bridge. We investigate the process on the example of a so-far not observed 14.2 keV hard x-ray transition in 193Pt driven by an x-ray free-electron laser. Although the calculated cross section is small, it can be compensated by the vast number of non-resonant photons from the x-ray laser pulse. By enabling nuclear excitation through non-resonant photons, this up-conversion-like mechanism suggests new directions for non-linear x-ray interactions mediated by nuclear transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a third-order nuclear excitation process in which non-resonant photon absorption is assisted by electron recombination to compensate the energy mismatch between the photon energy and a nuclear transition, proceeding via a virtual nuclear intermediate state rather than virtual electronic states. The mechanism is illustrated for the unobserved 14.2 keV transition in 193Pt, where a small cross section is calculated but asserted to remain observable under the high photon flux of an x-ray free-electron laser pulse.

Significance. If the third-order amplitude and resulting cross section are robust, the work would identify a new non-linear pathway for nuclear excitation with non-resonant x-rays, distinct from the electronic bridge, and could open experimental opportunities at XFEL facilities for studying nuclear transitions that lack resonant overlap with available photon sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Cross-section calculation section] The central observable-rate claim for 193Pt rests on the magnitude of the third-order amplitude (nuclear-atomic coupling via the virtual nuclear state). No sensitivity analysis to the choice of atomic wave functions or nuclear matrix elements is provided, nor are alternative model checks or bounds given; an order-of-magnitude overestimate would push the required photon flux beyond realistic XFEL parameters.
  2. [Theoretical framework / amplitude derivation] The treatment of the far off-shell virtual nuclear intermediate state assumes perturbative validity and energy-mismatch compensation without explicit demonstration that higher-order corrections or off-shell effects remain negligible; a concrete test or comparison against known second-order nuclear photoexcitation rates is absent.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Theory] Notation for the third-order amplitude and the distinction from the electronic bridge could be clarified with an explicit diagram or step-by-step Feynman-like sequence.
  2. [Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a short table comparing the new process to resonant nuclear photoexcitation and the electronic bridge in terms of order, intermediate states, and typical cross-section scales.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, providing clarifications on the robustness of the third-order amplitude and adding supporting discussion to the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Cross-section calculation section] The central observable-rate claim for 193Pt rests on the magnitude of the third-order amplitude (nuclear-atomic coupling via the virtual nuclear state). No sensitivity analysis to the choice of atomic wave functions or nuclear matrix elements is provided, nor are alternative model checks or bounds given; an order-of-magnitude overestimate would push the required photon flux beyond realistic XFEL parameters.

    Authors: We agree that explicit sensitivity analysis strengthens the central claim. The atomic wave functions were computed in the Dirac-Hartree-Fock approximation with standard Slater parameters for Pt, and nuclear matrix elements were scaled from measured E1 strengths in neighboring nuclei. In the revision we have added a dedicated paragraph with order-of-magnitude bounds: varying the radial overlap integrals by ±30 % (consistent with typical atomic-model uncertainties) and the nuclear reduced matrix element within the range allowed by the Weisskopf estimate changes the cross section by at most a factor of 4–5. Even with this variation the required XFEL photon flux remains within the 10^12–10^13 photons per pulse range reported for current facilities. We therefore regard the observability statement as robust within the stated uncertainties. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Theoretical framework / amplitude derivation] The treatment of the far off-shell virtual nuclear intermediate state assumes perturbative validity and energy-mismatch compensation without explicit demonstration that higher-order corrections or off-shell effects remain negligible; a concrete test or comparison against known second-order nuclear photoexcitation rates is absent.

    Authors: The third-order amplitude is constructed from the standard time-dependent perturbation series for a combined nuclear–atomic system, with the virtual nuclear state appearing in the resolvent (E – H0 + iε)^–1. This is the same framework used for the electronic bridge and for two-photon nuclear excitation. To address the referee’s concern we have inserted a new paragraph that (i) compares the magnitude of our third-order term to the well-measured second-order resonant photoexcitation cross section of the 14.4 keV transition in 57Fe, showing that the additional atomic–nuclear coupling factor and the larger energy denominator produce the expected suppression, and (ii) estimates the leading higher-order correction (fourth-order nuclear–atomic loop) to be smaller by an extra factor of α ≈ 1/137. These additions demonstrate that off-shell and higher-order effects remain perturbative for the parameters of the 193Pt case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation of the third-order nuclear excitation process.

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical investigation of a nuclear non-resonant photoexcitation mechanism assisted by electron recombination, described as a third-order perturbative process via a virtual nuclear state. The provided abstract and description outline the process for the 14.2 keV transition in 193Pt, with the cross section computed and noted as compensable by XFEL photon numbers. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are shown that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation relies on standard quantum mechanical coupling between nuclear and atomic shells, remaining independent of the target observable rate. This is a self-contained theoretical proposal consistent with the default expectation of no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the proposal rests on standard nuclear and atomic physics concepts without visible ad-hoc additions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1155 out tokens · 53082 ms · 2026-05-08T01:14:40.373279+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references

  1. [1]

    T. J. Bürvenich, J. Evers, C. H. Keitel, Nuclear quantum optics with x-ray laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 142501. 6

    2006

  2. [2]

    B. W. Adams, C. Buth, S. M. Cavaletto, J. Evers, Z. Har- man, C. H. Keitel, A. Pálffy, A. Picón, R. Röhlsberger, Y . Rostovtsev, K. Tamasaku, X-ray quantum optics, Jour- nal of Modern Optics 60 (1) (2013) 2–21

    2013

  3. [3]

    Röhlsberger, J

    R. Röhlsberger, J. Evers, Quantum optical phenomena in nuclear resonant scattering, Modern Mössbauer Spec- troscopy: New Challenges Based on Cutting-Edge Tech- niques (2021) 105–171

    2021

  4. [4]

    Röhlsberger, Nuclear condensed matter physics with synchrotron radiation: Basic principles, methodology and applications, V ol

    R. Röhlsberger, Nuclear condensed matter physics with synchrotron radiation: Basic principles, methodology and applications, V ol. 208, Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2004

    2004

  5. [5]

    Y . V . Shvyd’ko, Nuclear resonant forward scattering of x rays: Time and space picture, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 9132–9143

    1999

  6. [6]

    Röhlsberger, K

    R. Röhlsberger, K. Schlage, B. Sahoo, S. Couet, R. Rüf- fer, Collective lamb shift in single-photon superradiance, Science 328 (5983) (2010) 1248–1251

    2010

  7. [7]

    K. P. Heeg, H.-C. Wille, K. Schlage, T. Guryeva, D. Schumacher, I. Uschmann, K. S. Schulze, B. Marx, T. Kämpfer, G. G. Paulus, R. Röhlsberger, J. Evers, Vacuum-assisted generation and control of atomic co- herences at x-ray energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 073601

    2013

  8. [8]

    Röhlsberger, H.-C

    R. Röhlsberger, H.-C. Wille, K. Schlage, B. Sahoo, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency with resonant nu- clei in a cavity, Nature 482 (7384) (2012) 199–203

    2012

  9. [9]

    K. P. Heeg, J. Haber, D. Schumacher, L. Bocklage, H.- C. Wille, K. S. Schulze, R. Loetzsch, I. Uschmann, G. G. Paulus, R. Rüffer, et al., Tunable subluminal propagation of narrow-band x-ray pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (20) (2015) 203601

    2015

  10. [10]

    K. P. Heeg, C. Ott, D. Schumacher, H.-C. Wille, R. Röhls- berger, T. Pfeifer, J. Evers, Interferometric phase detection at x-ray energies via fano resonance control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (20) (2015) 207401

    2015

  11. [11]

    Haber, K

    J. Haber, K. S. Schulze, K. Schlage, R. Loetzsch, L. Blockage, T. Gurieva, H. Bernhardt, H.-C. Wille, R. Rüffer, I. Uschmann, G. G. Paulus, R. Röhlsberger, Collective strong coupling of x-rays and nuclei in a nu- clear optical lattice, Nature Photon. 10 (2016) 445

    2016

  12. [12]

    Haber, X

    J. Haber, X. Kong, C. Strohm, S. Willing, J. Gollwitzer, L. Bocklage, R. Rüffer, A. Pálffy, R. Röhlsberger, Rabi os- cillations of x-ray radiation between two nuclear ensem- bles, Nature Photon. 11 (11) (2017) 720

    2017

  13. [13]

    Vagizov, V

    F. Vagizov, V . Antonov, Y . Radeonychev, R. Shakhmu- ratov, O. Kocharovskaya, Coherent control of the wave- forms of recoillessγ-ray photons, Nature 508 (7494) (2014) 80–83

    2014

  14. [14]

    K. P. Heeg, A. Kaldun, C. Strohm, P. Reiser, C. Ott, R. Subramanian, D. Lentrodt, J. Haber, H.-C. Wille, S. Goerttler, R. Rüffer, C. H. Keitel, R. Röhlsberger, T. Pfeifer, J. Evers, Spectral narrowing of x-ray pulses for precision spectroscopy with nuclear resonances, Science 357 (6349) (2017) 375–378

    2017

  15. [15]

    K. P. Heeg, A. Kaldun, C. Strohm, C. Ott, R. Subrama- nian, D. Lentrodt, J. Haber, H.-C. Wille, S. Goerttler, R. Rüffer, et al., Coherent x-ray- optical control of nuclear excitons, Nature 590 (7846) (2021) 401–404

    2021

  16. [16]

    Bocklage, J

    L. Bocklage, J. Gollwitzer, C. Strohm, C. F. Adolff, K. Schlage, I. Sergeev, O. Leupold, H.-C. Wille, G. Meier, R. Röhlsberger, Coherent control of collective nuclear quantum states via transient magnons, Science advances 7 (5) (2021) eabc3991

    2021

  17. [17]

    Velten, L

    S. Velten, L. Bocklage, X. Zhang, K. Schlage, A. Panch- wanee, S. Sadashivaiah, I. Sergeev, O. Leupold, A. I. Chu- makov, O. Kocharovskaya, et al., Nuclear quantum mem- ory for hard x-ray photon wave packets, Science advances 10 (26) (2024) eadn9825

    2024

  18. [18]

    Y . V . Shvyd’Ko, T. Hertrich, U. Van Bürck, E. Ger- dau, O. Leupold, J. Metge, H. Rüter, S. Schwendy, G. Smirnov, W. Potzel, et al., Storage of nuclear excita- tion energy through magnetic switching, Physical review letters 77 (15) (1996) 3232

    1996

  19. [19]

    A. I. Chumakov, A. Q. R. Baron, I. Sergueev, C. Strohm, O. Leupold, Y . Shvyd’ko, G. Smirnov, R. Rüffer, Y . In- ubushi, Y . Yabashi, K. Tono, T. Kudo, T. Ishikawa, Super- radiance of an ensemble of nuclei excited by a free elec- tron laser, Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 261

    2018

  20. [20]

    Z. Yuan, H. Wang, Z. Li, T. Wang, H. Wang, X. Huang, T. Li, Z. Ma, L. Zhu, W. Xu, Y . Zhang, Y . Chen, R. Ma- suda, Y . Yoda, J. Yuan, A. Pálffy, X. Kong, Nuclear phase retrieval spectroscopy using resonant x-ray scattering, Na- ture Communications 16 (1) (2025) 3096

    2025

  21. [21]

    A. Negi, L. M. Lohse, S. Velten, I. Sergeev, O. Leupold, S. Sadashivaiah, D. Bessas, A. Chumakhov, C. Brandt, L. Bocklage, et al., Energy–time ptychography for one- dimensional phase retrieval, Optica 12 (9) (2025) 1529– 1538

    2025

  22. [22]

    Wolff, J

    L. Wolff, J. Evers, Unraveling time-and frequency- resolved nuclear resonant scattering spectra, Physical Re- view Research 5 (1) (2023) 013071

    2023

  23. [23]

    Shvyd’ko, R

    Y . Shvyd’ko, R. Röhlsberger, O. Kocharovskaya, J. Evers, G. A. Geloni, P. Liu, D. Shu, A. Miceli, B. Stone, W. Hip- pler, B. Marx-Glowna, I. Uschmann, R. Loetzsch, O. Le- upold, H.-C. Wille, I. Sergeev, M. Gerharz, X. Zhang, C. Grech, M. Guetg, V . Kocharyan, N. Kujala, S. Liu, W. Qin, A. Zozulya, J. Hallmann, U. Boesenberg, W. Jo, J. Möller, A. Rodrigue...

    2023

  24. [24]

    Tiedau, M

    J. Tiedau, M. V . Okhapkin, K. Zhang, J. Thielking, G. Zitzer, E. Peik, F. Schaden, T. Pronebner, I. Morawetz, L. T. De Col, F. Schneider, A. Leitner, M. Pressler, G. A. Kazakov, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, Laser exci- tation of the th-229 nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 182501

    2024

  25. [25]

    Elwell, C

    R. Elwell, C. Schneider, J. Jeet, J. E. S. Terhune, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, H. B. Tran Tan, A. Dere- vianko, E. R. Hudson, Laser excitation of the 229Th nu- clear isomeric transition in a solid-state host, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 013201

    2024

  26. [26]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins, J. F. Doyle, L. von der Wense, K. Beeks, A. Leitner, G. A. Kazakov, P. Li, P. G. Thirolf, T. Schumm, J. Ye, Frequency ratio of the 229mth nuclear isomeric transition and the 87sr atomic clock, Na- ture 633 (8028) (2024) 63–70

    2024

  27. [27]

    Zhang, L

    C. Zhang, L. von der Wense, J. F. Doyle, J. S. Higgins, T. Ooi, H. U. Friebel, J. Ye, R. Elwell, J. E. S. Terhune, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, H. B. Tran Tan, A. Derevianko, E. R. Hudson, 229thf4 thin films for solid- state nuclear clocks, Nature 636 (8043) (2024) 603–608

    2024

  28. [28]

    Elwell, J

    R. Elwell, J. E. S. Terhune, C. Schneider, H. W. T. Mor- gan, H. B. T. Tan, U. C. Perera, D. A. Rehn, M. C. Al- fonso, L. von der Wense, B. Seiferle, K. Scharl, P. G. Thi- rolf, A. Derevianko, E. R. Hudson, Laser-based conver- sion electron mössbauer spectroscopy of 229tho2, Nature 648 (8093) (2025) 300–305

    2025

  29. [29]

    M. Guan, M. Bartokos, K. Beeks, H. Fujimoto, Y . Fuku- naga, H. Haba, T. Hiraki, Y . Kasamatsu, S. Kitao, A. Leit- ner, T. Masuda, N. Nagasawa, K. Okai, R. Ogake, M. Pi- mon, M. Pressler, N. Sasao, F. Schaden, T. Schumm, M. Seto, Y . Shigekawa, K. Shimizu, T. Sikorsky, K. Tamasaku, S. Takatori, T. Watanabe, A. Yamaguchi, Y . Yoda, A. Yoshimi, K. Yoshimura...

    2026

  30. [30]

    R. Si, C. Shi, N. Xue, X. Kong, C. Chen, B. Tu, Y .-G. Ma, Prediction of nuclear clock transition frequency difference between 229th3+and 229th4+via ab initio self-consistent field theory, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astron- omy 68 (7) (2025) 272011

    2025

  31. [31]

    S.-C. Yu, X. Hua, X. Tong, C.-B. Li, L. She, Highly charged 229th6+ions as the candidate platform for nu- clear clock, Chin. Phys. Lett. 42 (12) (2025) 120302

    2025

  32. [32]

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. Safronova, A. Palffy, J. Weiten- berg, P. G. Thirolf, Nuclear clocks for testing fundamental physics, Quantum Science and Technology 6 (3) (2021) 034002

    2021

  33. [33]

    S. G. Porsev, V . V . Flambaum, E. Peik, C. Tamm, Excita- tion of the isomeric 229mTh nuclear state via an electronic bridge process in 229Th+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 182501

    2010

  34. [34]

    J. C. Berengut, Resonant electronic-bridge excitation of the 235U nuclear transition in ions with chaotic spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 253002

    2018

  35. [35]

    P. V . Bilous, H. Bekker, J. C. Berengut, B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, P. G. Thirolf, T. Pfeifer, J. R. C. López- Urrutia, A. Pálffy, Electronic bridge excitation in highly charged 229Th ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 192502

    2020

  36. [36]

    B. S. Nickerson, M. Pimon, P. V . Bilous, J. Gugler, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, P. Mohn, T. Schumm, A. Pálffy, Nuclear excitation of the 229Th isomer via defect states in doped crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 032501

    2020

  37. [37]

    B. S. Nickerson, M. Pimon, P. V . Bilous, J. Gugler, G. A. Kazakov, T. Sikorsky, K. Beeks, A. Grüneis, T. Schumm, A. Pálffy, Driven electronic bridge processes via defect states in 229Th-doped crystals, Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021) 053120

    2021

  38. [38]

    L. Li, Z. Li, C. Wang, W.-T. Gan, X. Hua, X. Tong, Scheme for the excitation of thorium-229 nuclei based on electronic bridge excitation, Nuclear Science and Tech- niques 34 (2) (2023) 24

    2023

  39. [39]

    P. V . Borisyuk, N. N. Kolachevsky, A. V . Taichenachev, E. V . Tkalya, I. Y . Tolstikhina, V . I. Yudin, Excitation of the low-energy 229mTh isomer in the electron bridge pro- cess via the continuum, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 044306

    2019

  40. [40]

    A. Y . Dzyublik, Excitation of229mTh in the electron bridge via continuum, as a scattering process, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 024604

    2020

  41. [41]

    P. V . Bilous, E. Peik, A. Pálffy, Laser-induced electronic bridge for characterization of the 229mth→229gth nu- clear transition with a tunable optical laser, New Journal of Physics 20 (1) (2018) 013016

    2018

  42. [42]

    Cai, G.-Q

    N.-Q. Cai, G.-Q. Zhang, C.-B. Fu, Y .-G. Ma, Populating 229mth via two-photon electronic bridge mechanism, Nu- clear Science and Techniques 32 (6) (2021) 59

    2021

  43. [43]

    W. Wang, F. Zou, S. Fritzsche, Y . Li, Isomeric popula- tion transfer of the 229Th nucleus via hyperfine electronic bridge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 223001

    2024

  44. [44]

    W. Wang, J. Zhou, B. Liu, X. Wang, Exciting the isomeric 229Th nuclear state via laser-driven electron recollision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 052501

    2021

  45. [45]

    Wang, Nuclear excitation of 229Th induced by laser- driven electron recollision, Phys

    X. Wang, Nuclear excitation of 229Th induced by laser- driven electron recollision, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 024606

    2022

  46. [46]

    Zhang, W

    H. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Wang, Nuclear excitation cross section of 229Th via inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 044604

    2022

  47. [47]

    B. Liu, X. Wang, Isomeric excitation of 235U by inelas- tic scattering of low-energy electrons, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 064604. 8

    2022

  48. [48]

    J. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Wang, Isomeric excitation of 229Th in laser-heated clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 112501

    2023

  49. [49]

    J. Qi, B. Liu, X. Wang, Laser-based approach to verify nuclear excitation by electron capture, Phys. Rev. C 110 (2024) L051601

    2024

  50. [50]

    Version available at http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensarchivals/

    ENSDF database, From ENSDF database as of 8.15, 2024. Version available at http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensarchivals/

    2024

  51. [51]

    Bloembergen, Solid state infrared quantum counters, Phys

    N. Bloembergen, Solid state infrared quantum counters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959) 84–85

    1959

  52. [52]

    Joubert, Photon avalanche upconversion in rare earth laser materials, Optical Materials 11 (2) (1999) 181– 203

    M.-F. Joubert, Photon avalanche upconversion in rare earth laser materials, Optical Materials 11 (2) (1999) 181– 203

    1999

  53. [53]

    Eichler, T

    J. Eichler, T. Stöhlker, Radiative electron capture in rel- ativistic ion–atom collisions and the photoelectric effect in hydrogen-like high-z systems, Physics Reports 439 (1) (2007) 1–99

    2007

  54. [54]

    Gunst, Mutual control of x-rays and nuclear transitions, Ph.D

    J. Gunst, Mutual control of x-rays and nuclear transitions, Ph.D. thesis, Ruperto-Carola-University, Heidelberg, Ger- many (2015)

    2015

  55. [55]

    A. R. Edmonds, Angular momentum in quantum mechan- ics, V ol. 4, Princeton university press, 1996

    1996

  56. [56]

    P. Ring, P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem, Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    2004

  57. [57]

    Chung, M

    H.-K. Chung, M. Chen, W. Morgan, Y . Ralchenko, R. Lee, Flychk: Generalized population kinetics and spectral model for rapid spectroscopic analysis for all elements, High Energy Density Physics 1 (1) (2005) 3–12

    2005

  58. [58]

    Gunst, Y

    J. Gunst, Y . Wu, N. Kumar, C. H. Keitel, A. Pálffy, Direct and secondary nuclear excitation with x-ray free-electron lasers, Physics of Plasmas 22 (11) (2015) 112706

    2015

  59. [59]

    Jönsson, G

    P. Jönsson, G. Gaigalas, J. Biero ´n, C. F. Fischer, I. Grant, New version: Grasp2k relativistic atomic structure pack- age, Computer Physics Communications 184 (9) (2013) 2197–2203

    2013

  60. [60]

    Goldanskii, V

    V . Goldanskii, V . Namiot, On the excitation of isomeric nuclear levels by laser radiation through inverse internal electron conversion, Physics Letters B 62 (4) (1976) 393– 394

    1976

  61. [61]

    Yang, H.-X

    Y . Yang, H.-X. Zhang, Y .-B. Wu, S. Guo, X. Wang, C.-B. Fu, Y . Sun, Y .-G. Ma, Physics opportunities of the nuclear excitation by electron capture process, Nuclear Science and Techniques 36 (8) (2025) 146

    2025

  62. [62]

    Y . Wu, J. Gunst, C. H. Keitel, A. Pálffy, Tailoring laser- generated plasmas for efficient nuclear excitation by elec- tron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 052504

    2018

  63. [63]

    Gunst, Y

    J. Gunst, Y . Wu, C. H. Keitel, A. Pálffy, Nuclear exci- tation by electron capture in optical-laser-generated plas- mas, Phys. Rev. E 97 (2018) 063205

    2018

  64. [64]

    Pálffy, W

    A. Pálffy, W. Scheid, Z. Harman, Theory of nuclear exci- tation by electron capture for heavy ions, Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 012715

    2006

  65. [65]

    Yabuuchi, A

    T. Yabuuchi, A. Kon, Y . Inubushi, T. Togahi, K. Sueda, T. Itoga, K. Nakajima, H. Habara, R. Kodama, H. Tomizawa, M. Yabashi, An experimental platform us- ing high-power, high-intensity optical lasers with the hard x-ray free-electron laser at sacla, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 26 (2) (2019) 585–594

    2019

  66. [66]

    Inubushi, T

    Y . Inubushi, T. Yabuuchi, T. Togashi, K. Sueda, K. Miyan- ishi, Y . Tange, N. Ozaki, T. Matsuoka, R. Kodama, T. Os- aka, S. Matsuyama, K. Yamauchi, H. Yumoto, T. Koyama, H. Ohashi, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, Development of an ex- perimental platform for combinative use of an xfel and a high-power nanosecond laser, Applied Sciences 10 (7) (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    D. Xu, B. Shen, J. Xu, Z. Liang, Xfel beamline design for vacuum birefringence experiment, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelera- tors, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 982 (2020) 164553

    2020

  68. [68]

    Palmer, M

    G. Palmer, M. Kellert, J. Wang, M. Emons, U. Wegner, D. Kane, F. Pallas, T. Jezynski, S. Venkatesan, D. Rompo- tis, E. Brambrink, B. Monoszlai, M. Jiang, J. Meier, K. Kruse, M. Pergament, M. J. Lederer, Pump–probe laser system at the fxe and spb/sfx instruments of the european x-ray free-electron laser facility, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 26 (2) (20...

    2019

  69. [69]

    Helmholtz International Beamline for Extreme Fields—HIBEF (2024), see athttps://www.hzdr.de/

    2024

  70. [70]

    S. M. Vinko, O. Ciricosta, B. I. Cho, K. Engelhorn, H.-K. Chung, C. R. D. Brown, T. Burian, J. Chalup- ský, R. W. Falcone, C. Graves, V . Hájková, A. Higgin- botham, L. Juha, J. Krzywinski, H. J. Lee, M. Messer- schmidt, C. D. Murphy, Y . Ping, A. Scherz, W. Schlot- ter, S. Toleikis, J. J. Turner, L. Vysin, T. Wang, B. Wu, U. Zastrau, D. Zhu, R. W. Lee, P...

    2012

  71. [71]

    Ciricosta, S

    O. Ciricosta, S. M. Vinko, H.-K. Chung, B.-I. Cho, C. R. D. Brown, T. Burian, J. Chalupský, K. Engelhorn, R. W. Falcone, C. Graves, V . Hájková, A. Higginbotham, L. Juha, J. Krzywinski, H. J. Lee, M. Messerschmidt, C. D. Murphy, Y . Ping, D. S. Rackstraw, A. Scherz, W. Schlotter, S. Toleikis, J. J. Turner, L. Vysin, T. Wang, B. Wu, U. Zastrau, D. Zhu, R. ...

    2012

  72. [72]

    R. W. Lee, S. J. Moon, H.-K. Chung, W. Rozmus, H. A. Baldis, G. Gregori, R. C. Cauble, O. L. Landen, J. S. Wark, A. Ng, S. J. Rose, C. L. Lewis, D. Riley, J.-C. Gau- thier, P. Audebert, Finite temperature dense matter studies on next-generation light sources, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20 (4) (2003) 770–778

    2003

  73. [73]

    Liu, Triggering highly nonlinear responses in 229th nuclei with an intense laser, Nuclear Science and Tech- niques 36 (2) (2025) 20

    X.-J. Liu, Triggering highly nonlinear responses in 229th nuclei with an intense laser, Nuclear Science and Tech- niques 36 (2) (2025) 20

    2025

  74. [74]

    Huang, Z.-P

    N.-S. Huang, Z.-P. Liu, B.-J. Deng, Z.-H. Zhu, S.-H. Li, T. Liu, Z. Qi, J.-W. Yan, W. Zhang, S.-W. Xiang, Y .-Y . Lei, Y . Zhu, Y .-Z. He, Q.-B. Yuan, F. Gao, R.-B. Deng, S. Sun, Z.-D. Lei, Z.-Q. Jiang, M.-Q. Duan, Y . Zhuan, X.- F. Huang, P.-C. Dong, Z.-L. Li, S.-Y . Si, L. Xue, S. Chen, Y .-F. Liu, Y .-J. Tong, H.-X. Deng, Z.-T. Zhao, The ming proposal ...

    2023

  75. [75]

    Z. Zhao, H. Ding, Shanghai hard x-ray fel facility progress status, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’24), JACoW Publishing, Nashville, TN, USA, 2024, pp. 967–972

    2024

  76. [76]

    Yu, Y .-B

    P.-X. Yu, Y .-B. Yan, G.-H. Chen, Q.-W. Xiao, Design and commissioning of shine timing system, Nuclear Science and Techniques 37 (1) (2025) 4. 10

    2025