Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 78 references

Light 'em Up: Enabling Few-Shot Low-Light 3D Gaussian Splatting with Multi-Scale Explicit Retinex Illumination Decoupling

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read MERID-GS decouples illumination from reflectance at multiple scales to stabilize few-shot low-light 360° 3D Gaussian Splatting.

desk verdict MERID-GS gives a concrete way to bolt explicit multi-scale Retinex decoupling onto 3DGS for few-shot low-light 360 synthesis, but the per-view separation risks new consistency problems. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.24053 v1 submitted 2026-04-27 cs.CV

YuHao Yin , Zongji Wang , Yuanben Zhang , Biqing Li , Jiesong Bai , Junyi Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords low-lightnovelviewsynthesis3DGaussianSplattingRetinexilluminationdecouplingfew-shotreconstruction360degreescenesmulti-scalefrequencygatingcross-scenegeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to enable consistent novel-view synthesis in poorly lit 360° scenes when only a handful of input images are available. Existing 3D Gaussian Splatting pipelines break down under low light because noise amplifies and lighting varies sharply with viewpoint, while pure 2D enhancement networks fail to generalize across scenes. By explicitly factoring each image into an illumination map and a reflectance map according to Retinex theory, then feeding the reflectance into a 3D Gaussian pipeline, the method suppresses noise in dark regions and removes view-dependent color shifts without retraining. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns ordinary low-light phone captures into reliable 3D models for robotics, AR, or virtual tourism.

What carries the argument

Multi-scale explicit Retinex illumination decoupling, which factors each view into separate illumination and reflectance components before they enter the 3D Gaussian Splatting optimization.

What would settle it

A controlled test on the paper's own low-light 360° multi-view dataset showing large color drift or broken geometry in novel views synthesized from only a few input frames would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MERID-GS achieves state-of-the-art low-light 360° novel-view synthesis by explicitly separating illumination and reflectance via multi-scale Retinex processing, applying a learnable gain and Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating to suppress noise while preserving structure, and combining the resulting reflectance with a lightweight Reflection Head inside 3D Gaussian Splatting; the resulting model adapts to new scenes from sparse views and maintains geometric and photometric consistency across large viewpoint changes.

Load-bearing premise

That factoring illumination away from reflectance at multiple scales will not create new geometric or color inconsistencies when the reflectance is later reconstructed in 3D from sparse low-light inputs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • New scenes can be modeled from only a few low-light photographs without per-scene retraining.
  • Noise is suppressed and dark structures are enhanced while view-to-view photometric consistency is preserved.
  • Full 360° synthesis becomes feasible under illumination conditions that defeat prior unsupervised and supervised baselines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decoupling might reduce artifacts in other challenging capture conditions such as motion blur or mixed indoor-outdoor lighting.
  • The released low-light multi-view dataset offers a concrete benchmark that future 3D reconstruction methods can be measured against for generalization.
  • Integrating the illumination-reflectance split into real-time 3D Gaussian pipelines could support low-light AR or robotic navigation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MERID-GS, a Multi-Scale Explicit Retinex Illumination-Decoupled Gaussian framework for few-shot low-light 360° novel view synthesis. It explicitly separates illumination and reflectance per Retinex theory, applies a learnable gain and Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating to handle noise and dark regions, and feeds a lightweight Reflection Head into 3D Gaussian Splatting for adaptation to new scenes from sparse views. The authors also introduce a low-light multi-view 360° dataset and claim SOTA results with superior cross-scene generalization and view consistency.

Significance. If the performance claims hold with proper validation, the work could advance practical few-shot 3D reconstruction in low-light settings by reducing reliance on per-scene supervised retraining and addressing photometric inconsistencies, with potential applications in robotics and immersive environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of SOTA performance, superior cross-scene generalization, and view consistency are asserted without any quantitative tables, ablation results, error analysis, or specific metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM, or consistency measures), making it impossible to verify that the method outperforms baselines rather than merely describing it.
  2. [Methods] Methods (Retinex decoupling and Reflection Head): The per-image operations (learnable gain, Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating) are described without an explicit multi-view reflectance consistency loss, 3D-aware regularization term, or cross-view constraint in the optimization. This leaves the view-consistency claim vulnerable, as independent per-view decoupling on sparse noisy inputs can introduce photometric inconsistencies that 3DGS optimization may bake in rather than suppress.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The acronym MERID-GS is introduced without immediate expansion in the abstract, which could be clarified for readability.
  2. [Experiments] The dataset construction is mentioned but lacks details on capture conditions, number of scenes/views, or lighting variation ranges, which would strengthen reproducibility claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below with clarifications and indicate revisions to the manuscript where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of SOTA performance, superior cross-scene generalization, and view consistency are asserted without any quantitative tables, ablation results, error analysis, or specific metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM, or consistency measures), making it impossible to verify that the method outperforms baselines rather than merely describing it.

    Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise summary of contributions and claims. The full manuscript contains quantitative tables in the Experiments section reporting PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, and other metrics, along with ablations, error analysis, and baseline comparisons that support the SOTA claims, cross-scene generalization, and view consistency. We agree that key numerical results would strengthen the abstract. We will revise the abstract to include specific metrics (e.g., average PSNR improvement) drawn from the experimental results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (Retinex decoupling and Reflection Head): The per-image operations (learnable gain, Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating) are described without an explicit multi-view reflectance consistency loss, 3D-aware regularization term, or cross-view constraint in the optimization. This leaves the view-consistency claim vulnerable, as independent per-view decoupling on sparse noisy inputs can introduce photometric inconsistencies that 3DGS optimization may bake in rather than suppress.

    Authors: The referee is correct that no explicit multi-view reflectance consistency loss or cross-view regularization term is defined for the per-image decoupling stage. Our design relies on the 3D Gaussian Splatting optimization and the lightweight Reflection Head to enforce consistency via the shared 3D representation and rendering losses across views. This implicit mechanism is intended to suppress inconsistencies from sparse low-light inputs. To strengthen the presentation, we will add a discussion in the Methods section explaining the role of 3DGS in view consistency and include a quantitative analysis of photometric consistency in the experiments. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces MERID-GS as a novel architectural combination of multi-scale explicit Retinex decoupling (learnable gain, frequency gating) with a lightweight Reflection Head and 3D Gaussian Splatting. No equations or derivations are presented that reduce the claimed SOTA cross-scene generalization or view consistency to quantities defined by the method's own fitted parameters or prior self-citations. Retinex theory is invoked as an external standard reference rather than a self-derived result, and performance assertions rest on empirical evaluation across datasets rather than tautological reduction. The construction is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on Retinex theory as a domain assumption and introduces several new algorithmic components whose independent validation is not provided in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • learnable gain
    A trainable scalar or map used to enhance dark-region structures; its value is learned during optimization rather than derived from first principles.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Retinex theory applies directly to multi-view low-light images and permits clean separation of illumination and reflectance without residual view-dependent effects
    The method is built on the premise that illumination and reflectance can be explicitly decoupled at multiple scales while preserving geometric consistency in 3D splatting.
invented entities (1)
  • Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating
    purpose: To suppress noise propagation and enhance dark-region structures during illumination decoupling
    A new gating mechanism conditioned on illumination state that is introduced as part of the framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Light 'em Up: Enabling Few-Shot Low-Light 3D Gaussian Splatting with Multi-Scale Explicit Retinex Illumination Decoupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.24053

@misc{pith2026260424053,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Light 'em Up: Enabling Few-Shot Low-Light 3D Gaussian Splatting with Multi-Scale Explicit Retinex Illumination Decoupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.24053}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.24053}
}
abstract

Full 360$^\circ$ novel view synthesis under low-light conditions remains challenging. Insufficient illumination, noise amplification, and view-dependent photometric inconsistencies prevent existing methods from jointly preserving geometric consistency and photorealism. Unsupervised approaches often exhibit color drift under large viewpoint variations, while supervised low-light enhancement models, though effective for 2D tasks, struggle to generalize to new scenes and typically require retraining. To address this issue, we propose MERID-GS, a Multi-Scale Explicit Retinex Illumination-Decoupled Gaussian framework for low-light 360$^\circ$ synthesis. Based on Retinex theory, the method explicitly separates illumination and reflectance, and suppresses noise propagation while enhancing dark-region structures via a learnable gain and Illumination-State-Guided Frequency Gating. Combined with lightweight Reflection Head and 3D Gaussian Splatting, MERID-GS adapts to new scenes with only a few shots and enables stable low-light novel view synthesis from sparse-view observations. In addition, we construct a low-light multi-view dataset covering full 360$^\circ$ scenes for joint evaluation. Thorough experiments across multiple datasets in this area demonstrate that MERID-GS achieves SOTA performance, exhibiting superior cross-scene generalization and view consistency. The source code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/YhuoyuH/MERID-GS..

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24053 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of MERID-GS. The first stage (a)(b) corresponds to Multi-scale Ex￾plicit Retinex Illumination Decoupling (MERID), which explicitly separates illumina￾tion and reflectance based on Retinex theory, and incorporates an Illumination-State￾guided Frequency Gated Attention (IS-FGA, see (d)) within a U-Net-like architecture. The second stage (c) is the Reflection Head, which performs lightweight fine-tuning on the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visual comparison on the bike scene in LLD, including our result, ground truth , the input, and the model without the Reflection Head, along with the corresponding brightness curves. Let the reflectance feature predicted by MERID be R0 ∈ R H×W×3 , the final reflectance output is expressed as: \mathbf {R}=\mathbf {R}_0+\psi (\mathbf {R}_0), (9) where ψ(·) denotes a lightweight channel mapping network. Due to its mini… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparisons on representative scenes (bike, sofa, kitchen) from the NeRF360, LOM_full, and LLD datasets, against representative baseline methods
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparisons on representative scenes (bike, chair, and counter) from the NeRF360, LOM_full, and LLD datasets, against representative baseline methods
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparisons on representative scenes (bike, chair, and bonsai) from the NeRF360, LOM_full, and LLD datasets, along with comparative analysis against four ablation settings. MERID-GS outperforms existing methods in synthesis quality and cross-scene generaliz…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    IEEE TCE53(2), 593–600 (2007) 4

    Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Kabir, M.H., Dewan, M.A.A., Chae, O.: A dynamic his- togram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE TCE53(2), 593–600 (2007) 4

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    In: CVPR

    Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B., Verbin, D., Srinivasan, P.P., Hedman, P.: Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In: CVPR. pp. 5470–5479 (2022) 2, 3, 4

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    In: ICCV

    Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B., Verbin, D., Srinivasan, P.P., Hedman, P.: Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid-based neural radiance fields. In: ICCV. pp. 19697–19705 (2023) 2, 4

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    In: ICCV

    Cai, Y., Bian, H., Lin, J., Wang, H., Timofte, R., Zhang, Y.: Retinexformer: One- stage retinex-based transformer for low-light image enhancement. In: ICCV. pp. 12504–12513 (2023) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    In: NeurIPS

    Cai, Y., Lin, J., Wang, H., Yuan, X., Ding, H., Zhang, Y., Timofte, R., Gool, L.V.:Degradation-awareunfoldinghalf-shuffletransformerforspectralcompressive imaging. In: NeurIPS. pp. 37749–37761 (2022) 5

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    In: NeurIPS

    Cai,Y.,Xiao,Z.,Liang,Y.,Qin,M.,Zhang,Y.,Yang,X.,Liu,Y.,Yuille,A.L.:Hdr- gs: Efficient high dynamic range novel view synthesis at 1000x speed via gaussian splatting. In: NeurIPS. pp. 68453–68471 (2024) 2

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    IEEE TIP20(12), 3431–3441 (2011) 4

    Celik, T., Tjahjadi, T.: Contextual and variational contrast enhancement. IEEE TIP20(12), 3431–3441 (2011) 4

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Charatan,D.,Li,S.L.,Tagliasacchi,A.,Sitzmann,V.:pixelsplat:3dgaussiansplats fromimagepairsforscalablegeneralizable3dreconstruction.In:CVPR.pp.19457– 19467 (2024) 2, 4

    work page 2024

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    In: ICCV

    Chen, C., Chen, Q., Do, M.N., Koltun, V.: Seeing motion in the dark. In: ICCV. pp. 3185–3194 (2019) 3

    2019

  2. [10]

    In: CVPR

    Chen, H., Wang, Y., Guo, T., Xu, C., Deng, Y., Liu, Z., Ma, S., Xu, C., Xu, C., Gao, W.: Pre-trained image processing transformer. In: CVPR. pp. 12299–12310 (2021) 5 16 Y. Yin et al

    2021

  3. [11]

    In: CVPR

    Chen, X., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Chen, Y., Feng, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J.: Hallucinated neural radiance fields in the wild. In: CVPR. pp. 12943–12952 (2022) 2

    2022

  4. [12]

    Digital Signal Processing14(2), 158–170 (2004) 4

    Cheng, H.D., Shi, X.: A simple and effective histogram equalization approach to image enhancement. Digital Signal Processing14(2), 158–170 (2004) 4

    2004

  5. [13]

    In: SIGGRAPH Asia

    Chugunov, I., Joshi, A., Murthy, K., Bleibel, F., Heide, F.: Neural light spheres for implicit image stitching and view synthesis. In: SIGGRAPH Asia. pp. 1–11 (2024) 4

    2024

  6. [14]

    In: CVPR

    Cui, Z., Chu, X., Harada, T.: Luminance-gs: Adapting 3d gaussian splatting to challenging lighting conditions with view-adaptive curve adjustment. In: CVPR. pp. 26472–26482 (2025) 2, 5, 10, 11

    2025

  7. [15]

    In: AAAI

    Cui, Z., Gu, L., Sun, X., Ma, X., Qiao, Y., Harada, T.: Aleth-nerf: Illumination adaptive nerf with concealing field assumption. In: AAAI. pp. 1435–1444 (2024) 2, 3, 5

    2024

  8. [16]

    In: CVPR

    Deng, K., Liu, A., Zhu, J.Y., Ramanan, D.: Depth-supervised nerf: Fewer views and faster training for free. In: CVPR. pp. 12882–12891 (2022) 2, 4

    2022

  9. [17]

    In: NeurIPS

    Fan, Z., Wang, K., Wen, K., Zhu, Z., Xu, D., Wang, Z.: Lightgaussian: Un- bounded 3d gaussian compression with 15x reduction and 200+ fps. In: NeurIPS. pp. 140138–140158 (2024) 2

    2024

  10. [18]

    In: CVPR

    Fu, X., Zeng, D., Huang, Y., Zhang, X.P., Ding, X.: A weighted variational model for simultaneous reflectance and illumination estimation. In: CVPR. pp. 2782–2790 (2016) 4

    2016

  11. [19]

    Knowledge-Based Systems240, 108010 (2022) 4

    Fu, Y., Hong, Y., Chen, L., You, S.: Le-gan: Unsupervised low-light image enhance- ment network using attention module and identity invariant loss. Knowledge-Based Systems240, 108010 (2022) 4

    2022

  12. [20]

    In: CVPR

    Guo, C., Li, C., Guo, J., Loy, C.C., Hou, J., Kwong, S., Cong, R.: Zero-reference deep curve estimation for low-light image enhancement. In: CVPR. pp. 1780–1789 (2020) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2020

  13. [21]

    In: ACM SIGGRAPH

    Huang, B., Yu, Z., Chen, A., Geiger, A., Gao, S.: 2d gaussian splatting for geo- metrically accurate radiance fields. In: ACM SIGGRAPH. pp. 1–11 (2024) 4

    2024

  14. [22]

    IEEE TIP22(3), 1032–1041 (2012) 4

    Huang, S.C., Cheng, F.C., Chiu, Y.S.: Efficient contrast enhancement using adap- tive gamma correction with weighting distribution. IEEE TIP22(3), 1032–1041 (2012) 4

    2012

  15. [23]

    IEEE TIP30, 2340–2349 (2021) 4

    Jiang, Y., Gong, X., Liu, D., Cheng, Y., Fang, C., Shen, X., Yang, J., Zhou, P., Wang, Z.: Enlightengan: Deep light enhancement without paired supervision. IEEE TIP30, 2340–2349 (2021) 4

    2021

  16. [24]

    IEEE TIP6(7), 965–976 (1997) 4

    Jobson, D.J., Rahman, Z.u., Woodell, G.A.: A multiscale retinex for bridging the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes. IEEE TIP6(7), 965–976 (1997) 4

    1997

  17. [25]

    IEEE TIP6(3), 451–462 (1997) 4

    Jobson, D.J., Rahman, Z.u., Woodell, G.A., et al.: Properties and performance of a center/surround retinex. IEEE TIP6(3), 451–462 (1997) 4

    1997

  18. [26]

    ACM TOG42(4), 1–14 (2023) 2, 4, 11

    Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkühler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM TOG42(4), 1–14 (2023) 2, 4, 11

    2023

  19. [27]

    In: NeurIPS

    Kulhanek, J., Peng, S., Kukelova, Z., Pollefeys, M., Sattler, T.: Wildgaussians: 3d gaussian splatting in the wild. In: NeurIPS. pp. 21271–21288 (2024) 2

    2024

  20. [28]

    Scientific American237(6), 108–129 (1977) 3

    Land, E.H.: The retinex theory of color vision. Scientific American237(6), 108–129 (1977) 3

    1977

  21. [29]

    IEEE TIP27(6), 2828–2841 (2018) 4

    Li, M., Liu, J., Yang, W., Sun, X., Guo, Z.: Structure-revealing low-light image enhancement via robust retinex model. IEEE TIP27(6), 2828–2841 (2018) 4

    2018

  22. [30]

    In: ECCV

    Li, R., Fidler, S., Kanazawa, A., Williams, F.: Nerf-xl: Scaling nerfs with multiple gpus. In: ECCV. pp. 92–107. Springer (2024) 2 Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 17

    2024

  23. [31]

    In: ICCV

    Li, R., Gao, H., Tancik, M., Kanazawa, A.: Nerfacc: Efficient sampling accelerates nerfs. In: ICCV. pp. 18537–18546 (2023) 2, 4

    2023

  24. [32]

    In: ECCV

    Liu, T., Wang, G., Hu, S., Shen, L., Ye, X., Zang, Y., Cao, Z., Li, W., Liu, Z.: Mvsgaussian: Fast generalizable gaussian splatting reconstruction from multi-view stereo. In: ECCV. pp. 37–53. Springer (2024) 2, 4

    2024

  25. [33]

    PR61, 650–662 (2017) 5

    Lore,K.G.,Akintayo,A.,Sarkar,S.:Llnet:Adeepautoencoderapproachtonatural low-light image enhancement. PR61, 650–662 (2017) 5

    2017

  26. [34]

    In: CVPR

    Lu, T., Yu, M., Xu, L., Xiangli, Y., Wang, L., Lin, D., Dai, B.: Scaffold-gs: Struc- tured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering. In: CVPR. pp. 20654–20664 (2024) 4

    2024

  27. [35]

    In: BMVC

    Lv, F., Lu, F., Wu, J., Lim, C.: Mbllen: Low-light image/video enhancement using cnns. In: BMVC. p. 4. Northumbria University (2018) 5

    2018

  28. [36]

    In: CVPR

    Ma, L., Ma, T., Liu, R., Fan, X., Luo, Z.: Toward fast, flexible, and robust low-light image enhancement. In: CVPR. pp. 5637–5646 (2022) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2022

  29. [37]

    In: CVPR

    Martin-Brualla,R.,Radwan,N.,Sajjadi,M.S.,Barron,J.T.,Dosovitskiy,A.,Duck- worth, D.: Nerf in the wild: Neural radiance fields for unconstrained photo collec- tions. In: CVPR. pp. 7210–7219 (2021) 2

    2021

  30. [38]

    In: CVPR

    Mildenhall, B., Hedman, P., Martin-Brualla, R., Srinivasan, P.P., Barron, J.T.: Nerf in the dark: High dynamic range view synthesis from noisy raw images. In: CVPR. pp. 16190–16199 (2022) 2

    2022

  31. [39]

    In: ECCV (2020) 2, 4

    Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In: ECCV (2020) 2, 4

    2020

  32. [40]

    In: CVPR

    Moran, S., Marza, P., McDonagh, S., Parisot, S., Slabaugh, G.: Deeplpf: Deep local parametric filters for image enhancement. In: CVPR. pp. 12826–12835 (2020) 5

    2020

  33. [41]

    ACM TOG41(4), 1–15 (2022) 4

    Müller, T., Evans, A., Schied, C., Keller, A.: Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM TOG41(4), 1–15 (2022) 4

    2022

  34. [42]

    In: CVPR

    Niedermayr, S., Stumpfegger, J., Westermann, R.: Compressed 3d gaussian splat- ting for accelerated novel view synthesis. In: CVPR. pp. 10349–10358 (2024) 2, 4

    2024

  35. [43]

    In: NeurIPS (2019) 9

    Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al.: Pytorch: An imperative style, high- performance deep learning library. In: NeurIPS (2019) 9

    2019

  36. [44]

    Journal of Digital Imaging11(4), 193 (1998) 4

    Pisano, E.D., Zong, S., Hemminger, B.M., DeLuca, M., Johnston, R.E., Muller, K., Braeuning, M.P., Pizer, S.M.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equaliza- tion image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging...

    1998

  37. [45]

    Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 39(3), 355–368 (1987) 4

    Pizer, S.M., Amburn, E.P., Austin, J.D., Cromartie, R., Geselowitz, A., Greer, T., ter Haar Romeny, B., Zimmerman, J.B., Zuiderveld, K.: Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 39(3), 355–368 (1987) 4

    1987

  38. [46]

    In: SIGGRAPH Asia

    Pu, G., Zhao, Y., Lian, Z.: Pano2room: Novel view synthesis from a single indoor panorama. In: SIGGRAPH Asia. pp. 1–11 (2024) 4

    2024

  39. [47]

    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing2016(1), 35 (2016) 4

    Rahman, S., Rahman, M.M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Al-Quaderi, G.D., Shoyaib, M.: An adaptive gamma correction for image enhancement. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing2016(1), 35 (2016) 4

    2016

  40. [48]

    In: CVPR

    Sharma, A., Tan, R.T.: Nighttime visibility enhancement by increasing the dy- namic range and suppression of light effects. In: CVPR. pp. 11977–11986 (2021) 5 18 Y. Yin et al

    2021

  41. [49]

    Sun, H., Yu, F., Xu, H., Zhang, T., Zou, C.: Ll-gaussian: Low-light scene recon- structionandenhancementviagaussiansplattingfornovelviewsynthesis.In:ACM MM. pp. 4261–4270 (2025) 2, 4, 5

    2025

  42. [50]

    In: CVPR

    Tancik, M., Casser, V., Yan, X., Pradhan, S., Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Bar- ron, J.T., Kretzschmar, H.: Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis. In: CVPR. pp. 8248–8258 (2022) 4

    2022

  43. [51]

    In: ICCV

    Wang, H., Xu, X., Xu, K., Lau, R.W.: Lighting up nerf via unsupervised decom- position and enhancement. In: ICCV. pp. 12632–12641 (2023) 2

    2023

  44. [52]

    In: ICCV

    Wang, R., Xu, X., Fu, C.W., Lu, J., Yu, B., Jia, J.: Seeing dynamic scene in the dark: A high-quality video dataset with mechatronic alignment. In: ICCV. pp. 9700–9709 (2021) 3

    2021

  45. [53]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, R., Zhang, Q., Fu, C.W., Shen, X., Zheng, W.S., Jia, J.: Underexposed photo enhancement using deep illumination estimation. In: CVPR. pp. 6849–6857 (2019) 5

    2019

  46. [54]

    IEEE TIP22(9), 3538–3548 (2013) 4

    Wang, S., Zheng, J., Hu, H.M., Li, B.: Naturalness preserved enhancement algo- rithm for non-uniform illumination images. IEEE TIP22(9), 3538–3548 (2013) 4

    2013

  47. [55]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, W., Yang, H., Fu, J., Liu, J.: Zero-reference low-light enhancement via physical quadruple priors. In: CVPR. pp. 26057–26066 (2024) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2024

  48. [56]

    ACM TOG43(4), 1–13 (2024) 2

    Wang, Y., Wang, C., Gong, B., Xue, T.: Bilateral guided radiance field processing. ACM TOG43(4), 1–13 (2024) 2

    2024

  49. [57]

    Displays30(3), 133–139 (2009) 4

    Wang, Z.G., Liang, Z.H., Liu, C.L.: A real-time image processor with combin- ing dynamic contrast ratio enhancement and inverse gamma correction for pdp. Displays30(3), 133–139 (2009) 4

    2009

  50. [58]

    In: BMVC (2018) 3

    Wei, C., Wang, W., Yang, W., Liu, J.: Deep retinex decomposition for low-light enhancement. In: BMVC (2018) 3

    2018

  51. [59]

    In: NeurIPS

    Weng, J., Yan, Z., Tai, Y., Qian, J., Yang, J., Li, J.: Mamballie: Implicit retinex- aware low light enhancement with global-then-local state space. In: NeurIPS. pp. 27440–27462 (2024) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    2024

  52. [60]

    In: CVPR

    Wu, G., Yi, T., Fang, J., Xie, L., Zhang, X., Wei, W., Liu, W., Tian, Q., Wang, X.: 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering. In: CVPR. pp. 20310–20320 (2024) 4

    2024

  53. [61]

    In: CVPR

    Xu, X., Wang, R., Fu, C.W., Jia, J.: Snr-aware low-light image enhancement. In: CVPR. pp. 17714–17724 (2022) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    2022

  54. [62]

    In: ICCV

    Xu, X., Wu, J., Yan, Q., Cui, J., Hong, R., Yu, B.: Learnable feature patches and vectors for boosting low-light image enhancement without external knowledge. In: ICCV. pp. 7761–7770 (2025) 10, 11, 12

    2025

  55. [63]

    In: ICCV

    Yang, S., Ding, M., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, J.: Implicit neural representation for cooperative low-light image enhancement. In: ICCV. pp. 12918–12927 (2023) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2023

  56. [64]

    IEEE TIP30, 2072– 2086 (2021) 3

    Yang, W., Wang, W., Huang, H., Wang, S., Liu, J.: Sparse gradient regularized deep retinex network for robust low-light image enhancement. IEEE TIP30, 2072– 2086 (2021) 3

  57. [65]

    In: ICCV

    Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Tan, M.: Cross-ray neural radiance fields for novel-view synthesis from unconstrained image collections. In: ICCV. pp. 15901–15911 (2023) 2

    2023

  58. [66]

    JMLR 26(34), 1–17 (2025) 10 Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 19

    Ye, V., Li, R., Kerr, J., Turkulainen, M., Yi, B., Pan, Z., Seiskari, O., Ye, J., Hu, J., Tancik, M., et al.: gsplat: An open-source library for gaussian splatting. JMLR 26(34), 1–17 (2025) 10 Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length 19

    2025

  59. [67]

    In: CVPR

    Zamir, S.W., Arora, A., Khan, S., Hayat, M., Khan, F.S., Yang, M.H.: Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In: CVPR. pp. 5728– 5739 (2022) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    2022

  60. [68]

    In: ECCV

    Zamir, S.W., Arora, A., Khan, S., Hayat, M., Khan, F.S., Yang, M.H., Shao, L.: Learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement. In: ECCV. pp. 492–511. Springer (2020) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    2020

  61. [69]

    In: ECCV

    Zhang, D., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, P., Qin, M., Wang, H.: Gaussian in the wild: 3d gaussian splatting for unconstrained image collections. In: ECCV. pp. 341–359. Springer (2024) 2

    2024

  62. [70]

    In: CVPR

    Zhang, F., Li, Y., You, S., Fu, Y.: Learning temporal consistency for low light video enhancement from single images. In: CVPR. pp. 4967–4976 (2021) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2021

  63. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07492 (2020) 2

    Zhang, K., Riegler, G., Snavely, N., Koltun, V.: Nerf++: Analyzing and improving neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07492 (2020) 2

    2010

  64. [72]

    IJCV129(4), 1013–1037 (2021) 3

    Zhang, Y., Guo, X., Ma, J., Liu, W., Zhang, J.: Beyond brightening low-light images. IJCV129(4), 1013–1037 (2021) 3

    2021

  65. [73]

    In: ACM MM

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, X.: Kindling the darkness: A practical low-light image enhancer. In: ACM MM. pp. 1632–1640 (2019) 3, 5

    2019

  66. [74]

    In: WACV

    Zheng, S., Gupta, G.: Semantic-guided zero-shot learning for low-light image/video enhancement. In: WACV. pp. 581–590 (2022) 3, 4, 10, 11

    2022

  67. [75]

    In: ECCV

    Zhou, S., Li, C., Change Loy, C.: Lednet: Joint low-light enhancement and deblur- ring in the dark. In: ECCV. pp. 573–589. Springer (2022) 5

    2022

  68. [76]

    In: NeurIPS

    Zhu, C., Wan, R., Shi, B.: Neural transmitted radiance fields. In: NeurIPS. pp. 38994–39006 (2022) 4

    2022

  69. [77]

    In: ACM MM

    Zou, W., Gao, H., Yang, W., Liu, T.: Wave-mamba: Wavelet state space model for ultra-high-definition low-light image enhancement. In: ACM MM. pp. 1534–1543 (2024) 3, 5, 10, 11, 12

    2024

  70. [78]

    In: AAAI

    Zou, Y., Li, X., Jiang, Z., Liu, J.: Enhancing neural radiance fields with adaptive multi-exposure fusion: A bilevel optimization approach for novel view synthesis. In: AAAI. pp. 7882–7890 (2024) 2

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.