arxiv: 2604.24889 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Phase diagram of a dual-species Rydberg atom ladder

Jian Cui, Lei-Yi-Nan Liu, Shi-Rong Peng, Su Yi, Xing-Man Wei, Yun-Han Zou, Ze-Yuan Huang

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

keywords dual-species Rydberg atomsRydberg atom ladderphase diagramZ2 ordermulti-critical pointDMRG calculationsfloating phasescrossover physics

0 comments

The pith

Dual-species Rydberg atom ladders host a smooth crossover between distinct Z2-ordered regimes and a multi-critical point where Ising, chiral, and first-order lines meet.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the ground-state phases of a one-dimensional ladder made from two different types of Rydberg atoms. Using large-scale numerical simulations, it finds several ordered phases with discrete symmetries, disordered regions, and floating phases with incommensurate patterns. A notable result is that two Z2-ordered states connect via a smooth crossover caused by a shift in low-energy excitations, without any phase transition. The work also locates a special multi-critical point separating Z2-tensor-Z2 from Z3-tensor-Z3 order, where Ising, chiral, and first-order transitions all meet. These features arise because the two species introduce competing interaction strengths and stronger fluctuations than in single-species setups.

Core claim

In the dual-species Rydberg atom ladder, the ground state exhibits a smooth crossover between distinct Z2-ordered regimes that reflects a reorganization of low-energy degrees of freedom rather than a true phase transition, a feature absent in single-species Rydberg arrays. Large-scale DMRG calculations further reveal a multi-critical point at the boundary between the Z2 ⊗ Z2 and Z3 ⊗ Z3 ordered phases, where Ising, chiral, and first-order transition lines intersect. The phase diagram also includes disordered phases, ordered phases with Z3 and Z4 symmetry, and floating phases with incommensurate wave vectors and algebraically decaying correlations.

What carries the argument

The dual-species Rydberg atom ladder Hamiltonian, whose competing interaction scales and enhanced quantum fluctuations enable the crossover and multi-critical behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical DMRG results with the used bond dimensions and finite system sizes faithfully capture the infinite-system behavior, including the smooth nature of the crossover and the precise location of the multi-critical point.

What would settle it

Numerical calculations on much larger systems or with significantly higher bond dimensions showing a sharp discontinuity or first-order jump instead of a smooth crossover in the Z2 regime, or experimental measurements in a physical dual-species array failing to show the predicted intersection of transition lines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24889 by Jian Cui, Lei-Yi-Nan Liu, Shi-Rong Peng, Su Yi, Xing-Man Wei, Yun-Han Zou, Ze-Yuan Huang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Ladder lattice of two-species Rydberg atoms. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Ground-state phase diagram of the ladder system. Four distinct ordered phases are identified, as illustrated in (c). view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Binder cumulant view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Finite size scaling analysis of binder cumulant and view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustration of the wave vector view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Illustration of the wave vector view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Data collapse of the Binder cumulant along view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Data analysis of the floating phase at (∆ view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Dual-species Rydberg atom arrays extend single-species platforms by introducing competing interaction scales and enhanced quantum fluctuations, enabling phenomena beyond homogeneous settings. In this work, we study the ground-state phase diagram of a one-dimensional dual-species Rydberg atom ladder using large-scale density-matrix renormalization group calculations. We identify disordered phases, multiple ordered phases with $\mathbb{Z}_2$, $\mathbb{Z}_3$, and $\mathbb{Z}_4$ symmetry, as well as floating phases characterized by incommensurate wave vectors and algebraically decaying correlations. Importantly, we observe a smooth crossover between distinct $\mathbb{Z}_2$-ordered regimes, reflecting a reorganization of low-energy degrees of freedom rather than a true phase transition, which is absent in single-species Rydberg arrays. We further uncover a multi-critical point at the boundary between the $\mathbb{Z}_2 \otimes \mathbb{Z}_2$ and $\mathbb{Z}_3 \otimes \mathbb{Z}_3$ ordered phases, where Ising, chiral, and first-order transition lines intersect. Our results demonstrate that dual-species Rydberg atom arrays provide a unique platform for realizing crossover physics and multi-critical behavior inaccessible in single-species architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Dual-species Rydberg ladders add a Z2 crossover and multi-critical point via DMRG, but the numerics lack the convergence checks needed to back those distinctions.

read the letter

The main thing here is that dual-species Rydberg ladders produce a smooth crossover between different Z2-ordered regimes and a multi-critical point where Ising, chiral, and first-order lines meet, neither of which appears in single-species arrays. That is the concrete new observation the paper puts forward from its DMRG runs on the ladder geometry with competing interaction scales. The work maps out the expected phases—disordered, Z2, Z3, Z4 ordered, and floating incommensurate ones—while showing how the extra species reorganizes low-energy degrees of freedom without forcing an extra transition. That part is useful and cleanly stated. The authors correctly note that single-species Rydberg literature does not contain these features, so the dual-species extension is doing real work. The numerics themselves are standard large-scale DMRG on a 1D model, which is the appropriate method. The soft spot is the missing support for the headline claims. The abstract and methods give no bond dimensions, system sizes, truncation errors, or finite-size scaling checks. Without those, it is difficult to tell whether the reported smooth crossover is genuinely smooth or just a weakly first-order line rounded by truncation, and whether the multi-critical intersection point is located accurately or shifted by finite-size effects. The stress-test concern lands here because the distinctions the paper emphasizes require precisely that level of control. This paper is for groups working on Rydberg atom arrays, 1D quantum ladders, or numerical studies of multi-criticality and crossovers. Readers who want a new experimental platform with intersecting transition lines will find the phase diagram relevant. It shows clear engagement with the model and prior literature, so it deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review but require the authors to add explicit convergence data and scaling plots before acceptance.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical study of the ground-state phase diagram for a one-dimensional dual-species Rydberg atom ladder using large-scale DMRG calculations. It identifies disordered phases, ordered phases with Z2, Z3, and Z4 symmetries, and floating phases with incommensurate wave vectors and algebraically decaying correlations. Central results include a smooth crossover between distinct Z2-ordered regimes (explicitly not a phase transition) and a multi-critical point at the Z2⊗Z2 / Z3⊗Z3 boundary where Ising, chiral, and first-order transition lines intersect.

Significance. If the DMRG identifications are robust, the work is significant for showing how dual-species Rydberg ladders realize crossover physics and multi-critical behavior absent in single-species arrays, due to competing interactions and enhanced fluctuations. This provides a platform for studying low-energy degree-of-freedom reorganization and intersecting transition lines. The choice of large-scale DMRG is a strength, as it is a standard and appropriate method for 1D quantum lattice models.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claims of 'a smooth crossover between distinct Z2-ordered regimes... rather than a true phase transition' and 'a multi-critical point... where Ising, chiral, and first-order transition lines intersect' are load-bearing for the paper's novelty. However, the abstract (and by extension the supporting results) provides no details on bond dimensions, system sizes, convergence criteria, or error estimates, leaving the support for distinguishing a crossover from a weak transition or locating the intersection point difficult to assess.
[Results section on ordered phases and multi-critical point] Results on Z2 and Z2⊗Z2 / Z3⊗Z3 phases: Distinguishing a smooth crossover from a weak first-order transition and accurately locating the multi-critical point requires that correlation lengths, order-parameter derivatives, and wave-vector incommensurability are free of truncation artifacts and finite-size rounding. No bond-dimension extrapolation, finite-size scaling, or explicit convergence checks at these points are reported, which could shift the intersection by O(1) in parameter space or misclassify the crossover.

minor comments (2)

[Figure captions] Figure captions for the phase diagram could explicitly note the numerical criteria used to identify floating phases versus ordered phases.
[Introduction] The notation Z2 ⊗ Z2 and Z3 ⊗ Z3 is clear but could be briefly defined in the text upon first use for readers less familiar with tensor-product symmetry labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments on the presentation of numerical details. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The abstract lacks details on bond dimensions, system sizes, convergence criteria, or error estimates, leaving the support for distinguishing a crossover from a weak transition or locating the intersection point difficult to assess.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional technical context to support the central claims. In the revised version we will expand the abstract to specify the largest bond dimension employed (D = 400), the maximum system sizes studied (L = 120), the truncation-error threshold (below 10^{-10}), and the procedure used to confirm convergence of correlation lengths and order parameters. These additions will allow readers to directly evaluate the robustness of the reported smooth Z2 crossover and the location of the multi-critical point. revision: yes
Referee: Distinguishing a smooth crossover from a weak first-order transition and accurately locating the multi-critical point requires correlation lengths, order-parameter derivatives, and wave-vector incommensurability to be free of truncation artifacts and finite-size rounding. No bond-dimension extrapolation, finite-size scaling, or explicit convergence checks at these points are reported.

Authors: We acknowledge that systematic extrapolation strengthens the identification of crossovers versus transitions. Although our DMRG runs were performed at multiple bond dimensions up to D = 400 and system sizes up to L = 120, with convergence verified by monitoring the discarded weight and comparing observables between successive D values, explicit extrapolations were not included in the original manuscript. In the revision we will add (i) bond-dimension extrapolation plots for the Z2 order parameters and correlation lengths at representative points along the crossover and near the multi-critical point, and (ii) a finite-size scaling analysis of the transition lines to confirm the intersection location and the absence of a true phase transition in the Z2 regime. These data will be presented in a new appendix. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical DMRG phase diagram with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript reports ground-state phases and transitions obtained exclusively from large-scale DMRG simulations of the dual-species Rydberg ladder Hamiltonian. No analytical derivations, parameter fits, or self-referential predictions are present; the claims of a smooth Z2 crossover and a multi-critical point at the Z2⊗Z2 / Z3⊗Z3 boundary follow directly from the computed correlation functions, order parameters, and entanglement spectra. Because the central results are numerical outputs rather than reductions of prior fitted quantities or self-cited theorems, the derivation chain contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study relies on standard numerical techniques and quantum mechanics without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain standards, or invented entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption DMRG provides a reliable approximation to the ground state of one-dimensional quantum lattice models when bond dimension is sufficiently large
Invoked implicitly by using large-scale DMRG to determine the phase diagram

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1373 out tokens · 59696 ms · 2026-05-07T17:02:48.556684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Henriet, L

L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, G.-O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum computing with neutral atoms, Quantum4, 327 (2020)

2020
[2]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with in- dividually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020)

2020
[3]

Schneider and A

P.-I. Schneider and A. Saenz, Quantum computation with ultracold atoms in a driven optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 85, 050304 (2012)

2012
[4]

Martinez-Dorantes, W

M. Martinez-Dorantes, W. Alt, J. Gallego, S. Ghosh, L. Ratschbacher, Y. V¨ olzke, and D. Meschede, Fast non- destructive parallel readout of neutral atom registers in optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 180503 (2017)

2017
[5]

Urban, T

E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Observation of rydberg blockade between two atoms, Nature Physics5, 110–114 (2009)

2009
[6]

Ga¨ etan, Y

A. Ga¨ etan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Observation of collective excitation of two individual atoms in the rydberg blockade regime, Nature Physics5, 115–118 (2009)

2009
[7]

Schauß, M

P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two- dimensional rydberg gas, Nature491, 87–91 (2012)

2012
[8]

Schauß, J

P. Schauß, J. Zeiher, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, T. Macr` ı, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Crystalliza- tion in ising quantum magnets, Science347, 1455–1458 (2015)

2015
[9]

Labuhn, D

H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Macr` ı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable two- dimensional arrays of single rydberg atoms for realizing quantum ising models, Nature534, 667–670 (2016)

2016
[10]

Bernien, S

H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

2017
[11]

M. J. O’Rourke and G. K.-L. Chan, Entanglement in the quantum phases of an unfrustrated rydberg atom array, Nature Communications14, 5397 (2023)

2023
[12]

Samajdar, W

R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Complex density wave orders and quantum phase transitions in a model of square-lattice rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 103601 (2020)

2020
[13]

Samajdar, W

R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2015785118 (2021)

2021
[14]

Zhang, S

J. Zhang, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, A. Bylinskii, B. Braver- man, F. Huber, J. Amato-Grill, A. Lukin, N. Gemelke, 11 A. Keesling, S.-T. Wang, Y. Meurice, and S.-W. Tsai, Probing quantum floating phases in rydberg atom arrays, Nature Communications16, 712 (2025)

2025
[15]

C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nature Physics14, 745 (2018)

2018
[16]

W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Pe- riodic orbits, entanglement, and quantum many-body scars in constrained models: Matrix product state ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 040603 (2019)

2019
[17]

S. Choi, C. J. Turner, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, A. A. Michailidis, Z. Papi´ c, M. Serbyn, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Emergent su(2) dynamics and perfect quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 220603 (2019)

2019
[18]

Verresen, M

R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Prediction of toric code topological order from rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. X11, 031005 (2021)

2021
[19]

K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth, C. Gidney, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. R...

2021
[20]

Rader and A

M. Rader and A. M. L¨ auchli, Floating phases in one-dimensional rydberg ising chains (2019), arXiv:1908.02068 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

X.-J. Yu, S. Yang, J.-B. Xu, and L. Xu, Fidelity susceptibility as a diagnostic of the commensurate- incommensurate transition: A revisit of the pro- grammable rydberg chain, Phys. Rev. B106, 165124 (2022)

2022
[22]

I. A. Maceira, N. Chepiga, and F. Mila, Conformal and chiral phase transitions in rydberg chains, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043102 (2022)

2022
[23]

Soto-Garcia and N

J. Soto-Garcia and N. Chepiga, Numerical investigation of quantum phases and phase transitions in a two-leg lad- der of rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013215 (2025)

2025
[24]

S.-A. Liao, J. Zhang, and L.-P. Yang, Phase diagram of rydberg atoms in a two-leg rectangular ladder, Phys. Rev. B111, 165154 (2025)

2025
[25]

Tsitsishvili, T

M. Tsitsishvili, T. Chanda, M. Votto, P. Fromholz, M. Dalmonte, and A. Nersesyan, Phase diagram of rydberg-dressed atoms on two-leg square ladders: Cou- pling supersymmetric conformal field theories on the lat- tice, Phys. Rev. B105, 155159 (2022)

2022
[26]

Fromholz, M

P. Fromholz, M. Tsitsishvili, M. Votto, M. Dalmonte, A. Nersesyan, and T. Chanda, Phase diagram of rydberg- dressed atoms on two-leg triangular ladders, Phys. Rev. B106, 155411 (2022)

2022
[27]

Y. Han, H. Zhang, and L. He, Exploring the finite- temperature behavior of rydberg atom arrays: A tensor network approach, Phys. Rev. B111, 235133 (2025)

2025
[28]

C.-X. Li, S. Yang, and J.-B. Xu, Quantum phases of ryd- berg atoms on a frustrated triangular-lattice array, Opt. Lett.47, 1093 (2022)

2022
[29]

Yang and J.-B

S. Yang and J.-B. Xu, Density-wave-ordered phases of rydberg atoms on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. E106, 034121 (2022)

2022
[30]

Kornjaˇ ca, R

M. Kornjaˇ ca, R. Samajdar, T. Macr` ı, N. Gemelke, S.-T. Wang, and F. Liu, Trimer quantum spin liquid in a hon- eycomb array of rydberg atoms, Communications Physics 6, 10.1038/s42005-023-01470-z (2023)

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01470-z 2023
[31]

M. R. Hirsbrunner, M. Kornjaˇ ca, R. Samajdar, S. Darbha, M. Hamdan, J. Balewski, E. Rrapaj, S.-T. Wang, D. Camps, F. Liu, P. L. S. Lopes, and K. Klymko, Quantum criticality and nonequilibrium dynamics on a lieb lattice of rydberg atoms (2025), arXiv:2508.05737 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[32]

Anand, C

S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species rydberg array, Nature Physics20, 1744 (2024)

2024
[33]

Y. Zeng, P. Xu, X. He, Y. Liu, M. Liu, J. Wang, D. J. Papoular, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Zhan, Entangling two individual atoms of different isotopes via rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 160502 (2017)

2017
[34]

Sheng, J

C. Sheng, J. Hou, X. He, K. Wang, R. Guo, J. Zhuang, B. Mamat, P. Xu, M. Liu, J. Wang, and M. Zhan, Defect- free arbitrary-geometry assembly of mixed-species atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 083202 (2022)

2022
[35]

Singh, S

K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-element, two-dimensional atom ar- ray with continuous-mode operation, Phys. Rev. X12, 011040 (2022)

2022
[36]

Liu, S.-Y

L.-Y.-N. Liu, S.-Y. Yu, S.-R. Peng, J. Sheng, S. Yi, P. Xu, S.-S. Gong, T. Shi, and J. Cui, Novel ground states and emergent quantum many-body scars in a two-species rydberg atom array (2024), arXiv:2408.15965 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

C. Li, S. Liu, H. Wang, W. Zhang, Z.-X. Li, H. Zhai, and Y. Gu, Uncovering emergent spacetime supersymmetry with rydberg atom arrays, Physical Review Letters133, 10.1103/physrevlett.133.223401 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.223401 2024
[38]

Quantum cellular automata on a dual-species rydberg processor,

R. White, V. Ramesh, A. Impertro, S. Anand, F. Cesa, G. Giudici, T. Iadecola, H. Pichler, and H. Bernien, Quantum cellular automata on a dual-species rydberg processor (2026), arXiv:2601.16257 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[39]

F. Cesa, A. D. Fini, D. A. Korbany, R. Tricarico, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, and L. Piroli, Engineering dis- crete local dynamics in globally driven dual-species atom arrays (2026), arXiv:2601.16961 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[40]

B. Li, D. Dilley, A. Gonzales, T. A. Hahn, R. White, R. Arnon, H. Bernien, Z. Saleem, and L. Jiang, Efficient entanglement purification circuit design for dual-species atom arrays (2025), arXiv:2509.12370 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

ˇSibali´ c, J

N. ˇSibali´ c, J. Pritchard, C. Adams, and K. Weatherill, Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms, Computer Physics Communica- tions220, 319 (2017)

2017
[42]

S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992). 12

1992
[43]

S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

1993
[44]

Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

2011
[45]

Fishman, S

M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

2022
[46]

Fishman, S

M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Code- base release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

2022
[47]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical42, 504005 (2009)

2009
[48]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

2004
[49]

Binder, Critical properties from monte carlo coarse graining and renormalization, Phys

K. Binder, Critical properties from monte carlo coarse graining and renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 693 (1981)

1981
[50]

Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter43, 119 (1981)

K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter43, 119 (1981)

1981
[51]

D. A. Huse and M. E. Fisher, Domain walls and the melt- ing of commensurate surface phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 793 (1982)

1982
[52]

Zauner-Stauber, L

V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M. T. Fishman, F. Verstraete, and J. Haegeman, Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B97, 045145 (2018)

2018
[53]

Samajdar, S

R. Samajdar, S. Choi, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Numerical study of the chiral𭟋 3 quantum phase transition in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023614 (2018)

2018
[54]

Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

2003
[55]

Karrasch and J

C. Karrasch and J. E. Moore, Luttinger liquid physics from the infinite-system density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B86, 155156 (2012)

2012
[56]

M. Cea, M. Grossi, S. Monaco, E. Rico, L. Taglia- cozzo, and S. Vallecorsa, Exploring the phase diagram of the quantum one-dimensional annni model (2024), arXiv:2402.11022 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

S. R. White, I. Affleck, and D. J. Scalapino, Friedel oscil- lations and charge density waves in chains and ladders, Phys. Rev. B65, 165122 (2002)

2002
[58]

Fendley, K

P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B69, 075106 (2004)

2004
[59]

X. Wu, X. Liang, Y. Tian, F. Yang, C. Chen, Y.-C. Liu, M. K. Tey, and L. You, A concise review of rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation*, Chinese Physics B30, 020305 (2021)

2021