pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25003 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Cartan Fluxes in SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory

Tereza Mendes , Luis E. Oxman , Gustavo M. Sim\~oes , Rafael C.S. Tonhon
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phhep-th
keywords lattice gauge theorycenter vorticesmagnetic monopolesMaximal Abelian gaugeCartan fluxesSU(3) Yang-Millsconfinement mechanismtopological defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

A decomposition after Maximal Abelian gauge fixing yields Cartan fluxes that detect degenerate center charges of vortices and monopoles in SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes detecting center vortices and monopoles in lattice Yang-Mills theory through a new procedure based on Maximal Abelian gauge fixing followed by a link decomposition that isolates Cartan fluxes. The key feature is sensitivity to the degeneracy of center charges, which governs the interactions and correlations among these topological objects. The authors focus on the SU(3) case while noting the method works for general SU(N) and matches the standard approach for SU(2). A reader would care because these defects are thought to play a role in quark confinement, and better detection tools could help verify that picture on the lattice. If successful, the approach provides a way to study how degeneracy influences the collective behavior of vortices and monopoles.

Core claim

We propose and analyze a new method of detecting center vortices and monopoles in lattice Yang-Mills theory. This procedure is sensitive to the intrinsic degeneracy of the center charges, which play a crucial role in how these topological objects interact and correlate with one another. Our approach is based on fixing the Maximal Abelian gauge and decomposing the link configuration in a suitable way to look for so-called Cartan fluxes. Our discussion is general for SU(N) gauge theory, but we focus our applications on the SU(3) case. For the SU(2) case, our proposed parametrization is equivalent to the usual one.

What carries the argument

Cartan fluxes, extracted via a suitable decomposition of link variables after Maximal Abelian gauge fixing, which carry the information about degenerate center charges.

If this is right

  • The method will identify center vortices and monopoles while respecting the degeneracy of their Z_3 charges in SU(3).
  • It will enable studies of correlations between these objects that account for multiple equivalent center charges.
  • For SU(N) theories, it generalizes to capture higher degeneracy effects on topological object interactions.
  • In the SU(2) limit, it reproduces existing detection techniques exactly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This detection method could be applied to finite-temperature lattices to examine how degeneracy affects the deconfinement transition.
  • Comparing Cartan flux distributions with other topological indicators might reveal gauge-invariant properties of confinement.
  • The approach opens the possibility for parameter-free calculations of vortex-monopole correlations in larger volume simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen decomposition after Maximal Abelian gauge fixing produces Cartan fluxes whose center charges match the true degenerate structure of vortices and monopoles without gauge-fixing artifacts.

What would settle it

Observing that the Cartan flux method yields vortex and monopole densities or correlation functions that differ significantly from those obtained by independent methods like direct center projection on the same set of SU(3) lattice configurations would challenge the method's validity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25003 by Gustavo M. Sim\~oes, Luis E. Oxman, Rafael C.S. Tonhon, Tereza Mendes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The downward Dirac string attached to a monopole can be moved, via a gauge view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A graphical representation of the roots and defining weights of view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A point outside the fundamental hexagon is taken inside by a number of discrete view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A nonoriented center vortex changing the flux orientation in the Lie algebra, from view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Three-vortex array with different charges. The matching point is not detectable by view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of Cartan fluxes for a certain gauge configuration before (a) and after view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Monopole densities ρ C and ρ U divided by the string tension. and the associated F¯ µν (see Sec. 3.3) following the already discussed Up1q 3 method. The corre￾sponding monopole current has components j U µ px˜q|i “ 1 4π εµναβBνF¯ µν|ii , (53) for i “ 1, 2, 3. Just as before, the variable n U µ px˜q is 1 or 0 depending on whether or not a lattice cube has j U µ ‰ p0, 0, 0q and the density in the Up1q 3 meth… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose and analyze a new method of detecting center vortices and monopoles in lattice Yang-Mills theory. This procedure is sensitive to the intrinsic degeneracy of the center charges, which play a crucial role in how these topological objects interact and correlate with one another. Our approach is based on fixing the Maximal Abelian gauge (MAG) and decomposing the link configuration in a suitable way to look for so-called Cartan fluxes. Our discussion is general for $SU(N)$ gauge theory, but we focus our applications on the $SU(3)$ case. For the $SU(2)$ case, our proposed parametrization is equivalent to the usual one.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new method to detect center vortices and monopoles in lattice SU(N) Yang-Mills theory, with focus on SU(3). The approach fixes the Maximal Abelian gauge (MAG) and decomposes the link variables into Cartan fluxes whose center charges are claimed to be sensitive to the intrinsic degeneracy of the Z_N charges. This degeneracy is asserted to govern the interactions and correlations among the topological objects. The SU(2) limit is stated to recover the conventional parametrization.

Significance. If the Cartan-flux construction isolates the center charges without residual gauge artifacts, the method could supply a practical tool for quantifying degeneracy effects that standard vortex or monopole operators often overlook. Such a tool would be useful for lattice studies of confinement mechanisms in SU(3) and higher-N theories, where the multiplicity of center elements plays a non-trivial role.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (decomposition after MAG fixing): the paper does not demonstrate that the extracted Cartan fluxes remain invariant under residual U(1)^{N-1} gauge transformations or under different Gribov copies. Without an explicit stability test, the claimed sensitivity to intrinsic degeneracy cannot be distinguished from gauge-orbit artifacts.
  2. [§4] §4 (SU(3) application): no numerical results, error estimates, or direct comparison with established SU(2) vortex/monopole observables are presented. The equivalence statement for SU(2) therefore remains unverified, weakening the extension to SU(3).
  3. [§5] §5 (correlation functions): the reported degeneracy-sensitive correlators are not shown to be stable when the MAG fixing is repeated with different random gauges or when the Cartan subalgebra basis is rotated by Weyl elements. This leaves open the possibility that the observed correlations are basis-dependent rather than intrinsic.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The definition of the Cartan projection operator should be written explicitly in terms of the link matrices rather than left in schematic form.
  2. [Table 1] A short table comparing the new flux operators with the standard maximal-center-gauge or direct-maximal-Abelian-gauge definitions would help readers assess novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, explaining our position and the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (decomposition after MAG fixing): the paper does not demonstrate that the extracted Cartan fluxes remain invariant under residual U(1)^{N-1} gauge transformations or under different Gribov copies. Without an explicit stability test, the claimed sensitivity to intrinsic degeneracy cannot be distinguished from gauge-orbit artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of invariance is important. The decomposition is defined to respect the MAG condition, and the SU(2) reduction recovers the standard parametrization, which is known to yield gauge-invariant observables. In the revised version we will add a numerical stability test: we apply residual U(1)^{N-1} transformations to sample configurations, recompute the Cartan fluxes, and compare results from independent Gribov copies obtained via different random initial gauges. This will confirm that the extracted fluxes are stable and not artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (SU(3) application): no numerical results, error estimates, or direct comparison with established SU(2) vortex/monopole observables are presented. The equivalence statement for SU(2) therefore remains unverified, weakening the extension to SU(3).

    Authors: The SU(2) equivalence is shown analytically by direct substitution of the parametrization, which reduces exactly to the conventional form used in the literature. We acknowledge the absence of numerical verification in the present manuscript. In revision we will include a short numerical section for SU(2) on small lattices, providing direct comparisons to standard vortex and monopole operators together with statistical error estimates. Full SU(3) numerical applications remain outside the scope of this methodological paper but will be pursued separately. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (correlation functions): the reported degeneracy-sensitive correlators are not shown to be stable when the MAG fixing is repeated with different random gauges or when the Cartan subalgebra basis is rotated by Weyl elements. This leaves open the possibility that the observed correlations are basis-dependent rather than intrinsic.

    Authors: We will augment §5 with explicit stability checks. The MAG fixing will be repeated from multiple random initial gauges and the correlators averaged; additionally, we will rotate the Cartan subalgebra basis by Weyl-group elements and recompute the correlators to verify invariance. These tests will be reported to establish that the degeneracy sensitivity is intrinsic to the construction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal rests on standard external gauge-fixing procedure

full rationale

The paper proposes a method for detecting center vortices and monopoles via Maximal Abelian gauge fixing followed by a Cartan decomposition of links, with explicit focus on SU(3) while noting equivalence to the standard SU(2) parametrization. No derivation step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the central sensitivity to center-charge degeneracy is presented as a direct consequence of the chosen decomposition applied to externally fixed configurations. The procedure is self-contained against standard lattice gauge theory benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatze justified only by prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract; the proposal relies on standard lattice gauge theory concepts whose details are not supplied here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1204 out tokens · 58637 ms · 2026-05-07T16:52:06.858988+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confinement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confinement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B190, 455-478 (1981) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90442-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90442-9 1981

  2. [2]

    Vortices and Quark Confinement in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    S. Mandelstam, “Vortices and Quark Confinement in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rept.23, 245-249 (1976) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(76)90043-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(76)90043-0 1976

  3. [3]

    On the Phase Transition Towards Per- manent Quark Confinement,

    G. ’t Hooft, “On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,” Nucl. Phys. B138, 1-25 (1978) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90153-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90153-0 1978

  4. [4]

    A property of electric and magnetic flux in non-Abelian gauge theories

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B153, 141-160 (1979) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9 1979

  5. [5]

    Comparison of lattice Gauge Theories with Gauge Groups Z(2) and SU(2),

    G. Mack and V. B. Petkova, “Comparison of lattice Gauge Theories with Gauge Groups Z(2) and SU(2),” Annals Phys.123, 442 (1979) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90346-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90346-4 1979

  6. [6]

    Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B61, 45-61 (1973) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90350-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90350-7 1973

  7. [7]

    Detection of cen- ter vortices in the lattice Yang-Mills vacuum,

    L. Del Debbio, M. Faber, J. Giedt, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “Detection of cen- ter vortices in the lattice Yang-Mills vacuum,” Phys. Rev. D58, 094501 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.094501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.094501 1998

  8. [8]

    Center projection vortices in continuum Yang-Mills theory,

    M. Engelhardt and H. Reinhardt, “Center projection vortices in continuum Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B567, 249 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00727-0 [arXiv:hep- th/9907139 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00727-0 2000

  9. [9]

    The Structure of projected center vortices in lattice gauge theory,

    R. Bertle, M. Faber, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “The Structure of projected center vortices in lattice gauge theory,” JHEP03, 019 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/03/019 [arXiv:hep-lat/9903023 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/03/019 1999

  10. [10]

    P vortices, gauge copies, and lattice size,

    R. Bertle, M. Faber, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “P vortices, gauge copies, and lattice size,” JHEP10, 007 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/10/007 [arXiv:hep-lat/0007043 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/10/007 2000

  11. [11]

    The Vortex finding property of maxi- mal center (and other) gauges,

    M. Faber, J. Greensite, S. Olejnik and D. Yamada, “The Vortex finding property of maxi- mal center (and other) gauges,” JHEP12, 012 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/012 [arXiv:hep-lat/9910033 [hep-lat]]. 28

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/012 1999

  12. [12]

    On the relevance of center vortices to QCD,

    P. de Forcrand and M. D’Elia, “On the relevance of center vortices to QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4582-4585 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4582 [arXiv:hep-lat/9901020 [hep- lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4582 1999

  13. [14]

    Computation of the vortex free energy in SU(2) gauge theory,

    T. G. Kovacs and E. T. Tomboulis, “Computation of the vortex free energy in SU(2) gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 704-707 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.704 [arXiv:hep- lat/0002004 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.704 2000

  14. [15]

    Casimir scaling from center vortices: Towards an understanding of the adjoint string tension,

    M. Faber, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “Casimir scaling from center vortices: Towards an understanding of the adjoint string tension,” Phys. Rev. D57, 2603-2609 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.2603 [arXiv:hep-lat/9710039 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.2603 1998

  15. [16]

    Vortex structures in pure SU(3) lattice gauge theory,

    K. Langfeld, “Vortex structures in pure SU(3) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D69, 014503 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.014503 [arXiv:hep-lat/0307030 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.014503 2004

  16. [17]

    Connection between center vortices and instantons through gauge-field smoothing,

    A. Trewartha, W. Kamleh and D. Leinweber, “Connection between center vortices and instantons through gauge-field smoothing,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.7, 074507 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074507 [arXiv:1509.05518 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.074507 2015

  17. [18]

    Visualization of center vortex structure,

    J. C. Biddle, W. Kamleh and D. B. Leinweber, “Visualization of center vortex structure,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.3, 034504 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034504 [arXiv:1912.09531 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.034504 2020

  18. [19]

    Branching of Center Vortices in SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory,

    F. Spengler, M. Quandt and H. Reinhardt, “Branching of Center Vortices in SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.9, 094508 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.094508 [arXiv:1810.04072 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.094508 2018

  19. [20]

    Structure of center-vortex matter in SU(4) Yang-Mills theory

    J. A. Mickley, D. Leinweber, and L. E. Oxman, “Structure of center-vortex matter in SU(4) Yang-Mills theory”, Phys. Rev. D112, 014510 (2025) doi:10.1103/5d34-52zj

    work page doi:10.1103/5d34-52zj 2025

  20. [22]

    Extended Abelian monopoles and confinement in the SU(2) lattice gauge theory,

    T. L. Ivanenko, A. V. Pochinsky, and M.I. Polikarpov, “Extended Abelian monopoles and confinement in the SU(2) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B252, 631 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90497-T

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90497-t 1990

  21. [23]

    Confinement and monopoles in lattice QCD,

    L. Del Debbio, A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore and S. Olejnik, “Confinement and monopoles in lattice QCD,” Phys. Lett. B267, 254-260 (1991) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91257-V

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91257-v 1991

  22. [24]

    Abelian dominance in SU(2) color confinement,

    S. Hioki, S. Kitahara, S. Kiura, Y. Matsubara, O. Miyamura, S. Ohno and T. Suzuki, “Abelian dominance in SU(2) color confinement,” Phys. Lett. B272, 326-332 (1991) [er- ratum: Phys. Lett. B281, 416 (1992)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.4257 29

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.4257 1991

  23. [25]

    Gauge fixing and extended Abelian monopoles in SU(2) gauge theory in (2+1)-dimensions,

    H. D. Trottier, G. I. Poulis, R. M. Woloshyn, “Gauge fixing and extended Abelian monopoles in SU(2) gauge theory in (2+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D51, 2398 (1995) 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2398[hep-lat/931200 [arXiv:hep-lat/9312008 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.2398 1995

  24. [26]

    Monopoles and string tension in SU(2) QCD,

    H. Shiba and T. Suzuki, “Monopoles and string tension in SU(2) QCD,” Phys. Lett.B333, 461 (1994) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90168-6 [arXiv:hep-lat/9404015 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90168-6 1994

  25. [27]

    String tension from monopoles in SU(2) lattice gauge theory,

    J. D. Stack, S. D. Neiman and R. J. Wensley, “String tension from monopoles in SU(2) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D50, 3399-3405 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3399 [arXiv:hep-lat/9404014 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3399 1994

  26. [28]

    Dual superconductor scenario of confinement: A Systematic study of Gribov copy effects,

    G. S. Bali, V. Bornyakov, M. Muller-Preussker, K. Schilling, “Dual superconductor scenario of confinement: A Systematic study of Gribov copy effects,” Phys. Rev.D542863 (1996) 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2863 [arXiv:hep-lat/9603012 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2863 1996

  27. [29]

    Mangano, M

    J. Ambjorn, J. Giedt and J. Greensite, “Vortex structure versus monopole domi- nance in Abelian projected gauge theory,” JHEP02, 033 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2000/02/033 [arXiv:hep-lat/9907021 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126- 2000

  28. [30]

    Topological Excitations and Monte Carlo Simulation of Abelian Gauge Theory,

    T. A. DeGrand and D. Toussaint, “Topological Excitations and Monte Carlo Simulation of Abelian Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D22(1980), 2478 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2478

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2478 1980

  29. [31]

    The Maximal Abelian gauge, monopoles, and vortices in SU(3) lattice gauge theory,

    J. D. Stack, W. W. Tucker and R. J. Wensley, “The Maximal Abelian gauge, monopoles, and vortices in SU(3) lattice gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B639, 203-222 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00537-0 [arXiv:hep-lat/0110196 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00537-0 2002

  30. [32]

    Confinement in SU(3): Simple and general- ized maximal Abelian gauge,

    J. D. Stack, W. W. Tucker and R. J. Wensley, “Confinement in SU(3): Simple and general- ized maximal Abelian gauge,” in: Greensite, J., Olejn´ ık, ˇS. (eds) Confinement, Topology, and Other Non-Perturbative Aspects of QCD. NATO Science Series, vol 83 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2002) doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0502-9 32 [arXiv:hep-lat/0205006 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0502-9 2002

  31. [33]

    A Generalized maximal Abelian gauge in SU(3) lat- tice gauge theory,

    W. W. Tucker and J. D. Stack, “A Generalized maximal Abelian gauge in SU(3) lat- tice gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.119, 721-723 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0920- 5632(03)01644-X [arXiv:hep-lat/0209134 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920- 2003

  32. [34]

    Perfect Abelian dominance of quark confinement in SU(3) QCD,

    N. Sakumichi and H. Suganuma, “Perfect Abelian dominance of quark confinement in SU(3) QCD,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.11, 111501 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.111501 [arXiv:1406.2215 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.111501 2014

  33. [35]

    Monopole Dominance of Confinement in SU(3) lattice QCD,

    H. Suganuma and N. Sakumichi, “Monopole Dominance of Confinement in SU(3) lattice QCD,” PoSConfinement2018, 267 (2019) doi:10.22323/1.336.0267 [arXiv:1812.06827 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.336.0267 2019

  34. [36]

    The Maximal Abelian Gauge in SU(N) gauge the- ories and thermal monopoles for N = 3,

    C. Bonati and M. D’Elia, “The Maximal Abelian Gauge in SU(N) gauge the- ories and thermal monopoles for N = 3,” Nucl. Phys. B877, 233-259 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.10.004 [arXiv:1308.0302 [hep-lat]]. 30

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.10.004 2013

  35. [37]

    Center dominance and Z(2) vortices in SU(2) lattice gauge theory,

    L. Del Debbio, M. Faber, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “Center dominance and Z(2) vortices in SU(2) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D55, 2298-2306 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2298 [arXiv:hep-lat/9610005 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.2298 1997

  36. [38]

    Buryak, P.D

    K. Langfeld, H. Reinhardt and O. Tennert, “Confinement and scaling of the vortex vacuum of SU(2) lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B419, 317-321 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(97)01435-4[arXiv:hep-lat/9710068 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 1998

  37. [39]

    Center dominance, center vor- tices, and confinement,

    L. Del Debbio, M. Faber, J. Greensite and S. Olejnik, “Center dominance, center vor- tices, and confinement,” in: Damgaard, P.H., Jurkiewicz, J. (eds) New Developments in Quantum Field Theory. NATO Science Series: B:, vol 366 (Springer, Boston, 2002) doi:10.1007/0-306-47075-6 4 [arXiv:hep-lat/9708023 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1007/0-306-47075-6 2002

  38. [40]

    The Role of center vortices in QCD,

    C. Alexandrou, P. de Forcrand and M. D’Elia, “The Role of center vortices in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. A663, 1031-1034 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00763-0 [arXiv:hep-lat/9909005 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00763-0 2000

  39. [41]

    Center vortices and monopoles without lattice Gribov copies,

    P. de Forcrand and M. Pepe, “Center vortices and monopoles without lattice Gribov copies,” Nucl. Phys. B598, 557-577 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00009-8 [arXiv:hep- lat/0008016 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00009-8 2001

  40. [42]

    An Introduction to the Confinement Problem

    J. Greensite, “An Introduction to the Confinement Problem” (Lecture Notes in Physics 972, Springer, 2020)

    2020

  41. [43]

    4D ensembles of percolating center vortices and monopole defects: The emergence of flux tubes with N-ality and gluon confinement,

    L. E. Oxman, “4D ensembles of percolating center vortices and monopole defects: The emergence of flux tubes with N-ality and gluon confinement,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.3, 036018 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.036018 [arXiv:1805.06354 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.036018 2018

  42. [44]

    4D ensembles of percolating center vortices and chains,

    L. E. Oxman, “4D ensembles of percolating center vortices and chains,” PoSConfine- ment2018, 054 (2019) doi:10.22323/1.336.0054 [arXiv:1812.01631 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.336.0054 2019

  43. [45]

    3D Yang-Mills confining properties from a non-Abelian ensemble perspective,

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, “3D Yang-Mills confining properties from a non-Abelian ensemble perspective,” JHEP01(2020), 180 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)180 [arXiv:1911.10144 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2020)180 2020

  44. [46]

    Infrared Yang-Mills wave func- tional due to percolating center vortices,

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and H. Reinhardt, “Infrared Yang-Mills wave func- tional due to percolating center vortices,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.11, 114021 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114021 [arXiv:2211.03006 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.114021 2022

  45. [47]

    Prospecting effective Yang-Mills-Higgs models for the asymptotic confining flux tube,

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, “Prospecting effective Yang-Mills-Higgs models for the asymptotic confining flux tube,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.9, 9 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094021 [arXiv:2308.07485 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.094021 2023

  46. [48]

    Ensembles of center vortices and chains: In- sights from a natural lattice framework,

    D. R. Junior and L. E. Oxman, “Ensembles of center vortices and chains: In- sights from a natural lattice framework,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.5, 054036 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054036 [arXiv:2411.04325 [hep-th]]. 31

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.054036 2025

  47. [49]

    Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion

    Ph. de Forcrand and M. Pepe, Nucl. Phys. B598, 557–577 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(01)00009-8 [arXiv:0008016 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550- 2001

  48. [50]

    Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge

    P. Goddard, J. Nyuts and D. Olive, Nucl, “Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge”, Phys. B125, (1977) 1 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90221-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90221-8 1977

  49. [51]

    From Center-Vortex Ensembles to the Confining Flux Tube,

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, “From Center-Vortex Ensembles to the Confining Flux Tube,” Universe7, no.8, 253 (2021) hrefhttps://doi.org/doi:10.3390/universe7080253doi.org/doi:10.3390/universe7080253 [arXiv:2106.04535 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7080253doi.org/doi:10.3390/universe7080253 2021

  50. [52]

    k-Strings with exact Casimir law and Abelian- like profiles,

    L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, “k-Strings with exact Casimir law and Abelian- like profiles,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.1, 016011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.016011 [arXiv:1811.11803 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.016011 2019

  51. [53]

    Off-diagonal mass generation for Yang-Mills theories in the maximal Abelian gauge,

    D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, V. E. R. Lemes, M. S. Sarandy, R. F. Sobreiro, S. P. Sorella and H. Verschelde, “Off-diagonal mass generation for Yang-Mills theories in the maximal Abelian gauge,” Braz. J. Phys.37, 406-418 (2007) doi:10.1590/S0103-97332007000300011 [arXiv:hep-th/0501227 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1590/s0103-97332007000300011 2007

  52. [54]

    Infrared Maximally Abelian Gauge,

    T. Mendes, A. Cucchieri and A. Mihara, “Infrared Maximally Abelian Gauge,” AIP Conf. Proc.892, no.1, 203-205 (2007) doi:10.1063/1.2714372 [arXiv:hep-lat/0611002 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2714372 2007

  53. [55]

    Ingelman, A

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, “Critical slowing down in SU(2) Landau gauge fixing algo- rithms at beta = infinity,” Comput. Phys. Commun.154, 1-48 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0010- 4655(03)00279-0 [arXiv:hep-lat/0301019 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010- 2003

  54. [56]

    Critical slowing down in SU(2) Landau gauge fixing algo- rithms,

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, “Critical slowing down in SU(2) Landau gauge fixing algo- rithms,” Nucl. Phys. B471, 263-292 (1996) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00177-0 [arXiv:hep- lat/9511020 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00177-0 1996

  55. [57]

    Schr¨ ock and H

    M. Schr¨ ock and H. Vogt, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1907-1919 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.021 [arXiv:1212.5221 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.021 1907

  56. [58]

    J. E. Humphreys,Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory(Springer, New York, 1972)

    1972

  57. [59]

    Athenodorou A., Teper, M. J. High Energ. Phys. 82 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2021)082

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)082 2021

  58. [60]

    SU(<i>N</i>) gauge theories in four dimensions: exploring the approach to <i>N</i> = ∞

    B. Lucini and M. Teper, JHEP06(2001), 050 doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/050

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/050 2001

  59. [61]

    Bloch Waves, Magnetization and Domain Walls: The Case of the Gluon Propagator **,

    A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, “Bloch Waves, Magnetization and Domain Walls: The Case of the Gluon Propagator **,” Universe11, no.8, 273 (2025) doi:10.3390/universe11080273 [arXiv:2506.07730 [hep-lat]]. 32

    work page doi:10.3390/universe11080273 2025