arxiv: 2604.25075 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Influence of Heterogeneity on the Response of Architected Metamaterials

Sarvesh Joshi , Jingye Tan , Craig M. Hamel , Stavros Gaitanaros , Nikolaos Bouklas

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords architected metamaterialsheterogeneitynonlocal modelGaussian random fieldslocalizationphase nucleationinstabilityfinite element simulation

0 comments

The pith

Heterogeneity fundamentally changes phase nucleation and macroscopic response in architected metamaterials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a way to add random material property differences into a model of metamaterials that already handles nonlocal effects and localization. By using Gaussian random fields with adjustable strength and spacing, the model keeps physical rules intact while allowing study of real-world imperfections from manufacturing. Finite element simulations of compression and indentation tests show that these random variations shift where new phases start, change the patterns of deformation bands, and modify the overall force-displacement curve. Importantly, the variations can remove the initial linear elastic part, change how flat the plateau is, and affect when instability occurs. The approach gives a single framework to connect microscale randomness to the big-picture mechanical behavior.

Core claim

Extending the gradient-enhanced nonlocal continuum formulation by imposing Gaussian random fields on constitutive parameters allows independent control of fluctuation amplitude and spatial correlation through a lengthscale ratio; finite element results establish that such heterogeneity alone alters phase nucleation, localization morphology, and macroscopic features including stability, plateau slope, and the presence of an initial elastic regime.

What carries the argument

A gradient-enhanced nonlocal continuum formulation with Gaussian random fields applied to constitutive parameters, using a ratio of nonlocal lengthscale to correlation lengthscale to control microstructure randomness.

If this is right

Heterogeneity alters phase nucleation and localization morphology in simulations of confined compression and indentation.
Material fluctuations can eliminate the initial elastic regime in the macroscopic response.
The slope of the stress plateau region is influenced by the level of heterogeneity.
Overall stability of the architected structure changes with stochastic material variations.
The framework links stochastic variability to instability-driven mechanics for better design understanding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Manufacturers of metamaterials should consider how process-induced randomness affects performance predictions instead of relying on idealized uniform models.
Adjusting the lengthscale ratio could allow systematic study of defect correlation effects in other architected materials.
Insights from this approach may extend to predicting variability in biological or soft matter systems that exhibit similar localization phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that Gaussian random fields on constitutive parameters preserve thermodynamic consistency and that the finite element simulations capture the localization effects accurately.

What would settle it

Performing physical compression experiments on metamaterial samples fabricated with controlled levels of material property variation and comparing the observed localization bands and stress-strain curves to the simulation predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25075 by Craig M. Hamel, Jingye Tan, Nikolaos Bouklas, Sarvesh Joshi, Stavros Gaitanaros.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The realizations showcase the variation of view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The realizations showcase the variation of view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Adapted from Joshi et al. [65]. Influence of vertical grading in the bulk modulus view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Influence of coefficient of variation of confined compression response for view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Effect of stochastic heterogeneity on densification patterns under confined compression. Jacobian view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Cyclic confined compression response with stochastic heterogeneity in all constitutive parameters view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Effect of correlation length on localization under confined compression for view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Effect of heterogeneity magnitude and indenter radius on the indentation response. Force– view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Jacobian contours for indentation with strong heterogeneity. Shown are the four realizations with view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Cyclic indentation response for heterogeneous materials. Loading–unloading force–displacement view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Architected metamaterials like foams and lattices exhibit complex responses governed by microstructural instabilities, localization, and phase-transition-like phenomena. Their behavior is further affected by heterogeneities inherent in their microstructure often caused through manufacturing processes. In this study we extend a gradient-enhanced, nonlocal continuum formulation to incorporate stochastic material heterogeneity through Gaussian random fields imposed on selected constitutive parameters. The framework enables independent control of both the amplitude and spatial correlation of material fluctuations while preserving thermodynamic consistency and regularization of localization. It also introduces a characteristic lengthscale ratio between the nonlocal and correlation lengthscales, that enables modeling at the limit of random or spatially correlated microstructures. Finite element simulations of confined compression and indentation show that heterogeneity fundamentally alters phase nucleation, localization morphology, and macroscopic response. Overall, the proposed framework provides a unified approach for linking stochastic material variability to instability-driven mechanics in architected metamaterials, enabling improved understanding of imperfection sensitivity, stability and design. It showcases how heterogeneity alone can influence characteristic features of the response, such as stability, slope of the plateau region, and elimination of the initial elastic regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper layers Gaussian random fields onto an existing nonlocal gradient model to control heterogeneity in metamaterials and reports shifts in nucleation, localization, and plateau response, but the physicality of those fields is the key open question.

read the letter

The core addition is extending a gradient-enhanced nonlocal continuum model by imposing Gaussian random fields on selected constitutive parameters, with independent knobs for fluctuation amplitude, spatial correlation length, and a new ratio between nonlocal and correlation lengthscales. Finite-element runs on confined compression and indentation then show heterogeneity changing phase nucleation sites, localization patterns, and macroscopic features such as loss of the initial elastic regime or altered plateau slope. That lengthscale ratio is the clearest new modeling handle, letting the setup span from fully random to spatially correlated microstructures without changing the base formulation much. The simulations are presented as evidence that heterogeneity alone can drive these effects, which aligns with practical concerns about manufacturing variability in lattices and foams. The framework keeps the regularization properties of the original nonlocal model, at least on paper. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags: Gaussian fields are unbounded and can generate negative values for parameters that must stay positive. The abstract claims thermodynamic consistency is preserved, yet gives no detail on truncation, log-normal mapping, or post-processing to enforce positivity. If the full methods section does not show that the observed changes survive when only physical realizations are kept, the results risk being artifacts rather than genuine heterogeneity effects. Error bars or robustness checks across random seeds are also not mentioned in the summary. This is incremental work rather than a new paradigm, but the controls and the lengthscale ratio make the numerics reproducible in principle. It is aimed at computational mechanicians who already use nonlocal models for metamaterials and want to add stochastic imperfections without starting from scratch. The claims are concrete enough to be checked by referees, so it deserves a serious review even if revisions on the random-field implementation are needed.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that extending a gradient-enhanced nonlocal continuum formulation to incorporate stochastic material heterogeneity through Gaussian random fields on selected constitutive parameters enables independent control of fluctuation amplitude and spatial correlation, introduces a characteristic lengthscale ratio between nonlocal and correlation lengths, and that finite-element simulations of confined compression and indentation demonstrate heterogeneity fundamentally alters phase nucleation, localization morphology, and macroscopic response features such as stability, plateau slope, and elimination of the initial elastic regime in architected metamaterials.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides a useful unified framework linking stochastic variability to instability-driven mechanics in metamaterials, with concrete simulation examples showing how heterogeneity alone influences key response characteristics. The independent controls and lengthscale ratio for modeling random versus correlated microstructures represent a modeling strength that could aid design accounting for manufacturing imperfections.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and model formulation section] Abstract and model formulation section: The claim that the Gaussian random field extension 'preserves thermodynamic consistency and regularization of localization' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the text provides no description of how negative realizations are prevented or corrected for parameters that must remain positive (e.g., moduli or length-scale coefficients). Unbounded Gaussian fields can produce non-physical values, raising the possibility that reported changes in nucleation and plateau behavior are simulation artifacts rather than genuine heterogeneity effects; explicit truncation, transformation, or post-processing steps are needed to substantiate the assertion.
[Numerical results section (simulation descriptions)] Numerical results section (simulation descriptions): The demonstrations of altered localization morphology and macroscopic features rely on single or limited realizations without reported statistics across ensembles, error bars, or sensitivity to the lengthscale ratio; this weakens the strength of the 'fundamentally alters' claim, as variability in outcomes could be dominated by particular random field draws rather than systematic heterogeneity influence.

minor comments (2)

Figure captions for the compression and indentation results could more explicitly state the specific values of amplitude, correlation length, and lengthscale ratio used in each panel to improve reproducibility.
Notation for the random field parameters (amplitude, correlation) is introduced clearly but could benefit from a dedicated table summarizing the independent controls and their ranges explored.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential utility of our framework. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and model formulation section] Abstract and model formulation section: The claim that the Gaussian random field extension 'preserves thermodynamic consistency and regularization of localization' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the text provides no description of how negative realizations are prevented or corrected for parameters that must remain positive (e.g., moduli or length-scale coefficients). Unbounded Gaussian fields can produce non-physical values, raising the possibility that reported changes in nucleation and plateau behavior are simulation artifacts rather than genuine heterogeneity effects; explicit truncation, transformation, or post-processing steps are needed to substantiate the assertion.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not provide an explicit description of the procedure used to ensure non-negative parameter values. In the underlying implementation, a log-normal transformation is applied to the Gaussian field realizations for parameters such as moduli and length-scale coefficients; this maps the unbounded Gaussian to strictly positive values while preserving the prescribed mean and variance. The transformation ensures that the constitutive relations remain thermodynamically consistent and that the nonlocal regularization (via positive internal length scales) is retained. We will revise the model formulation section to include the explicit transformation equations, verification steps, and a brief discussion confirming that the energy functional remains well-posed. revision: yes
Referee: [Numerical results section (simulation descriptions)] Numerical results section (simulation descriptions): The demonstrations of altered localization morphology and macroscopic features rely on single or limited realizations without reported statistics across ensembles, error bars, or sensitivity to the lengthscale ratio; this weakens the strength of the 'fundamentally alters' claim, as variability in outcomes could be dominated by particular random field draws rather than systematic heterogeneity influence.

Authors: We agree that ensemble statistics and sensitivity analysis would strengthen the robustness of the claims. The reported simulations employ representative realizations that illustrate the systematic qualitative changes; however, to directly address the concern we have generated additional realizations and will incorporate ensemble-averaged macroscopic responses, standard deviations, and a parametric study of the nonlocal-to-correlation lengthscale ratio in the revised numerical results section. These additions will demonstrate that the observed shifts in nucleation, localization morphology, and features such as plateau slope are consistent effects of heterogeneity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent model extension with direct simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper extends an existing gradient-enhanced nonlocal formulation by superimposing Gaussian random fields on selected constitutive parameters, introducing independent controls for fluctuation amplitude, spatial correlation length, and the ratio of nonlocal to correlation lengthscales. No quoted equations, derivations, or simulation protocols reduce any claimed outcome (altered nucleation, localization morphology, or macroscopic features) to a fitted parameter or input by construction. The abstract and description present the framework as a direct modeling choice that preserves thermodynamic consistency and regularization properties without invoking self-citations, uniqueness theorems from prior author work, or renaming of known results. Simulations of compression and indentation are treated as forward predictions from the extended model rather than statistical fits to the same data. This constitutes a self-contained extension whose central claims rest on the independent stochastic inputs and finite-element implementation, not on circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim relies on standard continuum mechanics assumptions extended with free parameters for heterogeneity; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)

amplitude of material fluctuations
Controls the strength of the stochastic heterogeneity imposed on constitutive parameters.
spatial correlation of material fluctuations
Determines the spatial scale over which the random variations are correlated.
characteristic lengthscale ratio
Ratio between the nonlocal lengthscale and the correlation lengthscale, introduced to model limits of random or correlated microstructures.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The gradient-enhanced nonlocal continuum formulation regularizes localization and preserves thermodynamic consistency when extended with Gaussian random fields.
Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the extension.
domain assumption Finite element simulations can capture the effects of heterogeneity on phase nucleation and macroscopic response.
Underlying the simulation results presented.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1514 out tokens · 131195 ms · 2026-05-07T16:21:54.803045+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

Flexible mechanical metamaterials,

K.Bertoldi, V.Vitelli, J.Christensen, M.VanHecke, Flexiblemechanicalmetamaterials 2 (11) 17066.doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.66. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/natrevmats201766

work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 2017
[2]

Z. Lin, L. S. Novelino, H. Wei, N. A. Alderete, G. H. Paulino, H. D. Espinosa, S. Krish- naswamy, Folding at the microscale: Enabling multifunctional 3d origami-architected metamaterials 16 (35) 2002229.doi:10.1002/smll.202002229. URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smll.202002229

work page doi:10.1002/smll.202002229
[3]

S. Joe, H. Wang, M. Totaro, L. Beccai, Development of ultralight hybrid pneumatic artificial muscle for large contraction and high payload, IEEE, pp. 27–32.doi:10. 1109/RoboSoft48309.2020.9116044. URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9116044/

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

T. Zhao, X. Dang, K. Manos, S. Zang, J. Mandal, M. Chen, G. H. Paulino, Modular chiral origami metamaterials 640 (8060) 931–940.doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08851-0. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08851-0

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08851-0
[5]

L. J. Gibson, Mechanical behavior of metallic foams 30 (1) 191–227.doi:10.1146/ annurev.matsci.30.1.191. URLhttps://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191
[6]

L. Gong, S. Kyriakides, W.-Y. Jang, Compressive response of open-cell foams. part i: Morphology and elastic properties 42 (5) 1355–1379.doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004. 07.023. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020768304004305

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004 2004
[7]

F. Han, Z. Zhu, J. Gao, Compressive deformation and energy absorbing characteristic of foamed aluminum 29 (10) 2497–2502.doi:10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z. URLhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z

work page doi:10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z
[8]

Andrews, W

E. Andrews, W. Sanders, L. Gibson, Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams 270 (2) 113–124.doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-7. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921509399001707

work page doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00170-7
[9]

Mills, H

N. Mills, H. Zhu, The high strain compression of closed-cell polymer foams 47 (3) 669– 695.doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00007-6. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509698000076

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(98)00007-6
[10]

Deshpande, N

V. Deshpande, N. Fleck, Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams 48 (6) 1253– 1283.doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00082-4. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509699000824 39

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00082-4
[11]

Bastawros, Experimental analysis of deformation mechanisms in a closed-cell alu- minum alloy foam 48 (2) 301–322.doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-6

A. Bastawros, Experimental analysis of deformation mechanisms in a closed-cell alu- minum alloy foam 48 (2) 301–322.doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-6. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509699000356

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00035-6
[12]

Bardenhagen, A

S. Bardenhagen, A. Brydon, J. Guilkey, Insight into the physics of foam densification via numerical simulation 53 (3) 597–617.doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2004.09.003. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509604001759

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2004.09.003 2004
[13]

Schüler, S

P. Schüler, S. F. Fischer, A. Bührig-Polaczek, C. Fleck, Deformation and failure be- haviour of open cell al foams under quasistatic and impact loading 587 250–261. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.030. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921509313009155

work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.030 2013
[14]

K. Liu, L. S. Novelino, P. Gardoni, G. H. Paulino, Big influence of small random im- perfections in origami-based metamaterials 476 (2241) 20200236.doi:10.1098/rspa. 2020.0236. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2020.0236

work page doi:10.1098/rspa 2020
[15]

S. D. Rapaka, M. Pandey, R. K. Annabattula, Effect of defects on the dynamic compres- sive behavior of cellular solids 170 105365.doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105365. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020740319331996

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105365 2019
[16]

L. Sang, W. Wu, Y. Yao, X. Dong, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Tuneable mechanical perfor- mance and reusability of 4d-printed heterogeneous metamaterials using shape memory biomass-derived polymer 19 (1) e2372620.doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2372620. URLhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17452759.2024.2372620

work page doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2372620 2024
[17]

R. N. Glaesener, S. Kumar, C. Lestringant, T. Butruille, C. M. Portela, D. M. Kochmann, Predicting the influence of geometric imperfections on the mechanical re- sponse of 2d and 3d periodic trusses, Acta materialia 254 (2023) 118918

2023
[18]

L. Gong, S. Kyriakides, Compressive response of open cell foams part ii: Initiation and evolution of crushing, International Journal of Solids and Structures 42 (5-6) (2005) 1381–1399

2005
[19]

Hilyard, , A

N. Hilyard, , A. Cunningham, Low density cellular plastics: physical basis of behaviour, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

2012
[20]

E. Chen, S. Luan, S. Gaitanaros, On the strength of brittle foams with uniform and gradient densities, Extreme Mechanics Letters 51 (2022) 101598

2022
[21]

V. S. Deshpande, N. A. Fleck, M. F. Ashby, Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 49 (8) (2001) 1747–1769

2001
[22]

U. G. Wegst, H. Bai, E. Saiz, A. P. Tomsia, R. O. Ritchie, Bioinspired structural materials, Nature materials 14 (1) (2015) 23–36. 40

2015
[23]

S. Bi, E. Chen, S. Gaitanaros, Additive manufacturing and characterization of brittle foams, Mechanics of Materials 145 (2020) 103368

2020
[24]

Zheng, W

X. Zheng, W. Smith, J. Jackson, B. Moran, H. Cui, D. Chen, J. Ye, N. Fang, N. Ro- driguez, T. Weisgraber, et al., Multiscale metallic metamaterials, Nature materials 15 (10) (2016) 1100–1106

2016
[25]

Roland, G

T. Roland, G. Ginot, M. Dabo, C. Gauthier, W. Drenckhan, P. Kékicheff, Physically- based modeling of polymer foam microstructures: from realistic cellular microstructures and their variabilities to mechanical properties, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 206 (2026) 106387.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106387. URLhttps://www.scienced...

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106387 2026
[26]

Torquato, et al., Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties, Vol

S. Torquato, et al., Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties, Vol. 16, Springer, 2002

2002
[27]

Deshpande, N

V. Deshpande, N. Fleck, Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams, Acta materialia 49 (10) (2001) 1859–1866

2001
[28]

C. Chen, N. Fleck, Size effects in the constrained deformation of metallic foams, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 50 (5) (2002) 955–977

2002
[29]

C. Yang, S. Kyriakides, Continuum modeling of crushing of low density foams, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 136 (2020) 103688

2020
[30]

Zhang, N

J. Zhang, N. Kikuchi, V. Li, A. Yee, G. Nusholtz, Constitutive modeling of poly- meric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading 21 (5) 369–386.doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0734743X97000870

work page doi:10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00087-0
[32]

Koumlis, L

S. Koumlis, L. Lamberson, Strain rate dependent compressive response of open cell polyurethane foam 59 (7) 1087–1103.doi:10.1007/s11340-019-00521-3. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11340-019-00521-3

work page doi:10.1007/s11340-019-00521-3
[33]

Markert, A biphasic continuum approach for viscoelastic high-porosity foams: Comprehensive theory, numerics, and application 15 (4) 371–446.doi:10.1007/ s11831-008-9023-0

B. Markert, A biphasic continuum approach for viscoelastic high-porosity foams: Comprehensive theory, numerics, and application 15 (4) 371–446.doi:10.1007/ s11831-008-9023-0. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11831-008-9023-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11831-008-9023-0
[34]

Khajehtourian, D

R. Khajehtourian, D. M. Kochmann, A continuum description of substrate-free dissipa- tive reconfigurable metamaterials, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 147 (2021) 104217. 41

2021
[35]

Khajehtourian, D

R. Khajehtourian, D. M. Kochmann, Soft adaptive mechanical metamaterials, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2021) 673478

2021
[36]

Gaitanaros, S

S. Gaitanaros, S. Kyriakides, A. M. Kraynik, On the crushing response of random open- cell foams, International Journal of Solids and Structures 49 (19-20) (2012) 2733–2743

2012
[37]

Gaitanaros, S

S. Gaitanaros, S. Kyriakides, On the effect of relative density on the crushing and energy absorption of open-cell foams under impact, International Journal of Impact Engineering 82 (2015) 3–13

2015
[38]

Hooshmand-Ahoor, M

Z. Hooshmand-Ahoor, M. G. Tarantino, K. Danas, Mechanically-grown morphogenesis of voronoi-type materials: Computer design, 3d-printing and experiments, Mechanics of Materials 173 (2022) 104432

2022
[39]

Hooshmand-Ahoor, H

Z. Hooshmand-Ahoor, H. Luo, K. Danas, M-voronoi and other random open and closed- cell elasto-plastic cellular materials: Geometry generation and numerical study at small and large strains, International Journal of Solids and Structures 290 (2024) 112680

2024
[40]

Gallup, K

L. Gallup, K. N. Long, D. J. Roach, W. D. Reinholtz, A. Cook, C. M. Hamel, A meshing framework for digital twins for extrusion based additive manufacturing, Additive Manu- facturing 121 (2026) 105137.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2026.105137. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860426000631

work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2026.105137 2026
[41]

P. Viot, I. Iordanoff, D. Bernard, Multiscale description of polymeric foam behavior: A new approach based on discrete element modeling 50 (6) 679–689.doi:10.1134/ S0965545X08060114. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0965545X08060114

work page doi:10.1134/s0965545x08060114
[42]

Miehe, C

C. Miehe, C. Bayreuther, On multiscale fe analyses of heterogeneous structures: from homogenization to multigrid solvers, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 71 (10) (2007) 1135–1180

2007
[43]

M. G. Geers, V. G. Kouznetsova, K. Matouš, J. Yvonnet, Homogenization methods and multiscale modeling: nonlinear problems, Encyclopedia of computational mechanics second edition (2017) 1–34

2017
[44]

Fritzen, M

F. Fritzen, M. Leuschner, Nonlinear reduced order homogenization of materials includ- ing cohesive interfaces, Computational Mechanics 56 (1) (2015) 131–151

2015
[45]

P. Neff, S. Forest, A geometrically exact micromorphic model for elastic metallic foams accounting for affine microstructure. modelling, existence of minimizers, identification of moduli and computational results, Journal of Elasticity 87 (2) (2007) 239–276

2007
[46]

C. Combescure, Selecting generalized continuum theories for nonlinear periodic solids based on the instabilities of the underlying microstructure, Journal of Elasticity 154 (1) (2023) 421–441. 42

2023
[47]

Iltchev, V

A. Iltchev, V. Marcadon, S. Kruch, S. Forest, Computational homogenisation of pe- riodic cellular materials: application to structural modelling, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 93 (2015) 240–255

2015
[48]

Sperling, T

S. Sperling, T. Guo, R. Peerlings, V. Kouznetsova, M. Geers, O. Rokoš, Enriched com- putational homogenization schemes applied to pattern-transforming elastomeric me- chanical metamaterials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10952 (2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

T. Guo, V. G. Kouznetsova, M. G. Geers, K. Veroy, O. Rokoš, Reduced-order modeling for second-order computational homogenization with applications to geometrically pa- rameterized elastomeric metamaterials, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 126 (1) (2025) e7604

2025
[50]

Maraghechi, O

S. Maraghechi, O. Rokoš, R. Peerlings, M. Geers, J. Hoefnagels, Harvesting deformation modes for micromorphic homogenization from experiments on mechanical metamateri- als, International Journal of Solids and Structures 301 (2024) 112916

2024
[51]

van Bree, O

S. van Bree, O. Rokoš, R. H. Peerlings, M. Doškář, M. G. Geers, A newton solver for micromorphic computational homogenization enabling multiscale buckling analysis of pattern-transforming metamaterials, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 372 (2020) 113333

2020
[52]

I. Jeon, T. Asahina, The effect of structural defects on the compressive behavior of closed-cell al foam 53 (12) 3415–3423.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.010. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359645405002089

work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.010 2005
[53]

I. Jeon, K. Katou, T. Sonoda, T. Asahina, K.-J. Kang, Cell wall mechanical properties of closed-cell al foam 41 (1) 60–73.doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.08.002. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167663608001087

work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.08.002 2008
[54]

Y. Duan, X. Zhao, B. Du, X. Shi, H. Zhao, B. Hou, Y. Li, Quasi-static compressive be- havior and constitutive model of graded foams 177 105603.doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci. 2020.105603. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020740319336720

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci 2020
[55]

F. Yao, M. Joshi, M. Bland-Rothgeb, P. Cripton, D. Cronin, J. Magliaro, Mechanical and material heterogeneity, strain localization and deformation rate effects in crushable expanded polystyrene foams 11 1718011.doi:10.3389/fmech.2025.1718011. URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmech.2025.1718011/ full

work page doi:10.3389/fmech.2025.1718011 2025
[56]

Avalle, G

M. Avalle, G. Belingardi, R. Montanini, Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram 25 (5) 455– 472.doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0734743X00000609 43

work page doi:10.1016/s0734-743x(00)00060-9
[57]

A. K. Landauer, X. Li, C. Franck, D. L. Henann, Experimental characterization and hyperelastic constitutive modeling of open-cell elastomeric foams 133 103701.doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103701. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509619303825

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103701 2019
[58]

J. Tao, X. Li, A. K. Landauer, D. Henann, C. Franck, Characterization of the vis- coelastic response of closed-cell foam materials, in: Challenges in Mechanics of Time Dependent Materials, Volume 2: Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Conference on Ex- perimental and Applied Mechanics, Springer, 2021, pp. 1–3

2020
[59]

Zheng, D

L. Zheng, D. M. Kochmann, S. Kumar, Hypercan: Hypernetwork-driven deep param- eterized constitutive models for metamaterials, Extreme Mechanics Letters 72 (2024) 102243

2024
[60]

Fernández, M

M. Fernández, M. Jamshidian, T. Böhlke, K. Kersting, O. Weeger, Anisotropic hy- perelastic constitutive models for finite deformations combining material theory and data-driven approaches with application to cubic lattice metamaterials, Computational Mechanics 67 (2) (2021) 653–677

2021
[61]

Fernández, F

M. Fernández, F. Fritzen, O. Weeger, Material modeling for parametric, anisotropic finite strain hyperelasticity based on machine learning with application in optimization of metamaterials, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 123 (2) (2022) 577–609

2022
[62]

Y. Wang, A. M. Cuitiño, Full-field measurementsof heterogeneous deformation patterns on polymeric foams using digital image correlation 39 (13) 3777–3796.doi:10.1016/ S0020-7683(02)00176-2. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020768302001762
[63]

Pierron, Identification of poisson’s ratios of standard and auxetic low-density polymeric foams from full-field measurements 45 (4) 233–253.doi:10.1243/ 03093247JSA613

F. Pierron, Identification of poisson’s ratios of standard and auxetic low-density polymeric foams from full-field measurements 45 (4) 233–253.doi:10.1243/ 03093247JSA613. URLhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/03093247JSA613

work page doi:10.1243/03093247jsa613
[64]

Gioia, Y

G. Gioia, Y. Wang, A. M. Cuitiño, The energetics of heterogeneous deformation in open-cell solid foams 457 (2009) 1079–1096.doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0707. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2000.0707

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0707 2009
[65]

Joshi, S

S. Joshi, S. M. Mousavi, C. M. Hamel, S. Gaitanaros, P. K. Purohit, R. Alberdi, N. Bouklas, Instabilities and phase transitions in architected metamaterials: a gradient- enhancedcontinuumapproach, ComputerMethodsinAppliedMechanicsandEngineer- ing 452 (2026) 118719

2026
[66]

Y. Sun, B. Amirrasouli, S. Razavi, Q. Li, T. Lowe, P. Withers, The variation in elastic modulus throughout the compression of foam materials 110 161–174.doi:10.1016/j. 44 actamat.2016.03.003. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359645416301446

work page doi:10.1016/j 2016
[67]

Wriggers, J

P. Wriggers, J. Korelc, P. Junker, A third medium approach for contact using first and second order finite elements, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 436 (2025) 117740

2025
[68]

Z. P. Bažant, M. Jirásek, Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress, Journal of engineering mechanics 128 (11) (2002) 1119–1149

2002
[69]

Pijaudier-Cabot, Z

G. Pijaudier-Cabot, Z. P. Bažant, Nonlocal damage theory, Journal of engineering mechanics 113 (10) (1987) 1512–1533

1987
[70]

M. E. Gurtin, Generalized ginzburg-landau and cahn-hilliard equations based on a microforce balance, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 92 (3-4) (1996) 178–192

1996
[71]

Richtmyer, A proposed method for the calculation of shocks, Los Alamos Nat

R. Richtmyer, A proposed method for the calculation of shocks, Los Alamos Nat. Lab., Los Alamos: NM, LAMS 671 (1948)

1948
[72]

A method for the numerical calculation of hydro- dynamic shocks

J. VonNeumann, R. D. Richtmyer, A method for the numerical calcula- tion of hydrodynamic shocks, Journal of Applied Physics 21 (3) (1950) 232– 237.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/21/3/232/18309197/ 232_1_online.pdf,doi:10.1063/1.1699639. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699639

work page doi:10.1063/1.1699639 1950
[73]

Miehe, M

C. Miehe, M. Hofacker, F. Welschinger, A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 199 (45-48) (2010) 2765–2778

2010
[74]

Lindgren, H

F. Lindgren, H. Rue, J. Lindström, An explicit link between gaussian fields and gaussian markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 73 (4) (2011) 423–498

2011
[75]

Roininen, J

L. Roininen, J. M. Huttunen, S. Lasanen, Whittle-matérn priors for bayesian statistical inversion with applications in electrical impedance tomography., Inverse Problems & Imaging 8 (2) (2014)

2014
[76]

J. Tan, D. Faghihi, A scalable framework for multi-objective pde-constrained design of building insulation under uncertainty, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 419 (2024) 116628

2024
[77]

Logg, K.-A

A. Logg, K.-A. Mardal, G. Wells, Automated solution of differential equations by the finite element method: The FEniCS book, Vol. 84, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. 45

2012
[78]

M. S. Alnæs, J. Blechta, J. Hake, A. Johansson, B. Kehlet, A. Logg, C. Richardson, J. Ring, M. E. Rognes, G. N. Wells, The fenics project version 1.5, Archive of Numerical Software 3 (100) (2015).doi:10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553

work page doi:10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553 2015
[79]

M. S. Alnæs, A. Logg, K. B. Ølgaard, M. E. Rognes, G. N. Wells, Unified form language: A domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 40 (2) (Mar. 2014).doi:10.1145/2566630. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1145/2566630

work page doi:10.1145/2566630 2014
[80]

Wriggers, J

P. Wriggers, J. Korelc, P. Junker, First order finite element formulations for third medium contact.doi:10.2139/ssrn.5130173. URLhttps://www.ssrn.com/abstract=5130173

work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.5130173
[81]

Liang, J

X. Liang, J. Shin, D. Magagnosc, Y. Jiang, S. J. Park, A. J. Hart, K. Turner, D. S. Gianola, P. K. Purohit, Compression and recovery of carbon nanotube forests described as a phase transition, International Journal of Solids and Structures 122 (2017) 196–209

2017

Showing first 80 references.