pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25630 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ω_c(3120) via femtoscopy correlation functions

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords femtoscopycorrelation functionshadronic moleculesOmega resonancesdynamically generated stateseffective potentialscoupled channels
0
0 comments X

The pith

Femtoscopic correlation functions exhibit enhancements that directly evidence the hadronic molecular nature of the Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors model the interactions between particles like Ξ and K using effective potentials that include both s-wave and d-wave components. They then compute the correlation functions that would be measured in particle collisions for the relevant channels. Clear peaks and enhancements appear in the low-momentum region for the Ξ⁰K⁻ and Ξc⁺K⁻ systems, matching the positions of the known resonances. These structures are interpreted as signatures that the resonances are bound states of the lighter hadrons rather than elementary particles. Such calculations provide a new observable for experiments to test the internal structure of these excited states.

Core claim

Using effective potential models for the coupled channels, the calculated femtoscopy correlation functions display pronounced enhancements in the Ξ⁰K⁻ and Ξc⁺K⁻ channels, which serve as direct evidence for the dynamically generated Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) states. Significant low-momentum enhancements in the Ξ*⁰K⁻ and Ξ*⁰K*⁻ channels are attributed to the Ω(2012) and Ω(2380) resonances.

What carries the argument

Effective potential models incorporating s- and d-wave interactions to calculate correlation functions in coupled channels associated with the resonances.

If this is right

  • Pronounced enhancements in the Ξ⁰K⁻ correlation functions provide direct evidence for the Ω(2012) as a dynamically generated molecular state.
  • Enhancements in the Ξc⁺K⁻ correlation functions support the molecular interpretation of the Ωc(3120).
  • Low-momentum enhancements in the Ξ*⁰K⁻ and Ξ*⁰K*⁻ channels are linked to the Ω(2012) and Ω(2380) resonances.
  • The theoretical results offer guidance for high-precision measurements at the LHC and RHIC to probe these states' structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method of using femtoscopy could be applied to other exotic hadron candidates to test for molecular components.
  • Confirmation of the enhancements would support the idea that many excited baryons arise from dynamic generation via hadron interactions.
  • The predictions could be tested in heavy-ion collision data where femtoscopic measurements are routine.
  • It may help differentiate between molecular and other possible internal structures for these resonances.

Load-bearing premise

The effective potential models with the selected s- and d-wave interactions accurately represent the hadron dynamics and that the enhancements uniquely diagnose the molecular nature.

What would settle it

A measurement of the Ξ⁰K⁻ correlation function at the LHC or RHIC that lacks the predicted pronounced enhancement at low momenta would falsify the claim that this signals the molecular Ω(2012).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25630 by Ju-Jun Xie, Si-Wei Liu, Wen-Tao Lyu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The calculated correlation functions for the relevant channels. The grey bands represent the theoretical uncertainties, which incorporate view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the femtoscopic correlation functions of systems associated with the $\Omega(2012)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega_c(3120)$ resonances, with the aim of elucidating their internal structures. By employing effective potential models that incorporate both $s$-wave and $d$-wave interactions, we calculate the correlation functions for the relevant coupled channels. Our numerical results reveal pronounced enhancement structures in the $\Xi^0K^-$ and $\Xi_c^+K^-$ correlation functions, which provide direct evidences for the dynamically generated $\Omega(2012)$ and $\Omega_c(3120)$ states. Furthermore, significant low-momentum enhancements are observed in the $\Xi^{*0}K^-$ and $\Xi^{*0}K^{*-}$ channel, which are attributed to the $\Omega(2012)$ and $\Omega(2380)$ resonances. These theoretical calculations provide crucial insights for future high-precision measurements at the LHC and RHIC, offering a novel and independent approach to determine the dynamically generated hadronic molecular nature of these $\Omega$ excited states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper employs effective potential models incorporating s- and d-wave interactions to dynamically generate the Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ωc(3120) as hadronic molecular states. It solves the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to obtain T-matrices and computes femtoscopic correlation functions C(q) for relevant coupled channels such as Ξ⁰K⁻, Ξc⁺K⁻, Ξ*⁰K⁻, and Ξ*⁰K*⁻. Numerical results show low-momentum enhancements attributed to the resonance poles, which the authors interpret as direct evidence for the molecular nature of these states and as guidance for future LHC/RHIC measurements.

Significance. If the enhancements can be demonstrated to be diagnostic of the molecular interpretation rather than generic resonance effects, the work would provide a useful complementary observable for hadron spectroscopy. Femtoscopy is an active experimental technique, so model predictions for specific channels could inform data analysis even if the uniqueness claim requires strengthening.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the assertion that the calculated enhancements in the Ξ⁰K⁻ and Ξc⁺K⁻ correlation functions constitute 'direct evidences for the dynamically generated Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) states' is not yet supported. The effective potentials and cutoffs are chosen to produce the resonance poles; the low-q rise in C(q) then follows directly from the resonant T-matrix. No parallel computation is reported that replaces the molecular T-matrix with a Breit-Wigner or quark-model amplitude possessing the same pole position and width but lacking the coupled-channel molecular dynamics. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim that the structures uniquely diagnose the hadronic molecular nature.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods section] The manuscript should explicitly list the numerical values of the strength and range parameters used in the effective potentials, together with any fitting procedure to known masses or widths, to allow reproducibility.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the correlation function C(q) and the source function should be defined once at first use and used consistently; the current presentation mixes q and p* without a clear conversion statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. The major point concerning the interpretation of the correlation-function enhancements is addressed below, together with the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and results section: the assertion that the calculated enhancements in the Ξ⁰K⁻ and Ξc⁺K⁻ correlation functions constitute 'direct evidences for the dynamically generated Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) states' is not yet supported. The effective potentials and cutoffs are chosen to produce the resonance poles; the low-q rise in C(q) then follows directly from the resonant T-matrix. No parallel computation is reported that replaces the molecular T-matrix with a Breit-Wigner or quark-model amplitude possessing the same pole position and width but lacking the coupled-channel molecular dynamics. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim that the structures uniquely diagnose the hadronic molecular nature.

    Authors: We agree that the low-momentum enhancement in C(q) is a direct consequence of the resonant pole in the T-matrix obtained from our Lippmann-Schwinger solution. Within our framework the T-matrix encodes the specific coupled-channel dynamics generated by the effective potentials that realize the molecular picture, and the correlation functions are computed consistently from this unitary amplitude. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that a side-by-side comparison with a Breit-Wigner or quark-model parametrization sharing the same pole position and width but lacking the underlying molecular dynamics would provide a stronger test of uniqueness. Because such an extended comparative study exceeds the scope of the present work, we will revise the abstract and the results section to replace the phrase 'direct evidences' with more cautious wording indicating that the enhancements are consistent with the dynamically generated molecular states obtained in our model. A short paragraph will also be added to the conclusions noting that future comparisons with non-molecular amplitudes would further establish the diagnostic capability of femtoscopy. These changes constitute a partial revision that directly responds to the referee's concern. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Correlation enhancements follow by construction from resonant poles built into the effective potentials

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "By employing effective potential models that incorporate both s-wave and d-wave interactions, we calculate the correlation functions for the relevant coupled channels. Our numerical results reveal pronounced enhancement structures in the Ξ^0K^- and Ξ_c^+K^- correlation functions, which provide direct evidences for the dynamically generated Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) states."

    The potentials are explicitly constructed to produce the resonances as poles; the correlation functions are then evaluated from the resulting T-matrix. The enhancements are therefore expected once the poles are reproduced and do not constitute independent evidence for the molecular nature.

full rationale

The paper tunes effective s- and d-wave potentials to dynamically generate the Ω(2012) and Ωc(3120) as poles in the T-matrix obtained from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation, then computes the femtoscopic correlation functions from the same T-matrix. The low-q enhancements in C(q) for the Ξ⁰K⁻ and Ξc⁺K⁻ channels are therefore a direct kinematic consequence of the input resonance poles rather than an independent diagnostic of molecular structure. No parallel calculation with a non-molecular amplitude (e.g., Breit-Wigner with identical mass and width) is reported, so the claim of 'direct evidences' reduces to a re-expression of the model's fitted dynamics. This is partial circularity of the fitted-input-called-prediction type; the central derivation remains internally consistent but does not furnish an external test of the molecular interpretation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on model-dependent effective potentials whose parameters are chosen to place resonance poles at the observed masses, plus the standard assumption that correlation functions are computed from the two-particle wave function via the Koonin-Pratt formalism.

free parameters (1)
  • strength and range parameters of the effective potentials
    These are adjusted so that the coupled-channel scattering produces poles at the positions of the Ω resonances.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Ω resonances are dynamically generated poles in the meson-baryon scattering amplitude.
    This is both the hypothesis under test and the mechanism built into the potential models.
  • standard math The femtoscopic correlation function is obtained from the scattering amplitude via the standard integral transform (Koonin-Pratt formula).
    This is the conventional relation used in femtoscopy studies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1513 out tokens · 39316 ms · 2026-05-08T03:28:06.030562+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)

  2. [2]

    Loring, B

    U. Loring, B. C. Metsch, and H. R. Petry, The Light baryon spectrum in a relativistic quark model with instanton induced quark forces: The Strange baryon spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. A10, 447 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0103290

  3. [3]

    Klempt and J.-M

    E. Klempt and J.-M. Richard, Baryon spectroscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1095 (2010), arXiv:0901.2055 [hep-ph]

  4. [4]

    Crede and W

    V . Crede and W. Roberts, Progress towards understanding baryon resonances, Rept. Prog. Phys.76, 076301 (2013), arXiv:1302.7299 [nucl-ex]

  5. [5]

    K.-T. Chao, N. Isgur, and G. Karl, Strangeness -2 and -3 Baryons in a Quark Model With Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D23, 155 (1981)

  6. [6]

    Pervin and W

    M. Pervin and W. Roberts, Strangeness -2 and -3 baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C77, 025202 (2008), 7 arXiv:0709.4000 [nucl-th]

  7. [7]

    R. N. Faustov and V . O. Galkin, Strange baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D92, 054005 (2015), arXiv:1507.04530 [hep-ph]

  8. [8]

    G. P. Engel, C. B. Lang, D. Mohler, and A. Sch ¨afer (BGR), QCD with Two Light Dynamical Chirally Improved Quarks: Baryons, Phys. Rev. D87, 074504 (2013), arXiv:1301.4318 [hep-lat]

  9. [9]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

  10. [10]

    Yeltonet al.(Belle), Observation of an ExcitedΩ − Baryon, Phys

    J. Yeltonet al.(Belle), Observation of an ExcitedΩ − Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 052003 (2018), arXiv:1805.09384 [hep- ex]

  11. [11]

    Liet al.(Belle), Evidence for the decayΩ 0 c → π+Ω(2012)− →π +( ¯KΞ) −, Phys

    Y . Liet al.(Belle), Evidence for the decayΩ 0 c → π+Ω(2012)− →π +( ¯KΞ) −, Phys. Rev. D104, 052005 (2021), arXiv:2106.00892 [hep-ex]

  12. [12]

    Jiaet al.(Belle), Observation ofΩ(2012) −→Ξ(1530)K¯ and measurement of the effective couplings ofΩ(2012) − to Ξ(1530)K¯andΞK¯, Phys

    S. Jiaet al.(Belle), Observation ofΩ(2012) −→Ξ(1530)K¯ and measurement of the effective couplings ofΩ(2012) − to Ξ(1530)K¯andΞK¯, Phys. Lett. B860, 139224 (2025), arXiv:2207.03090 [hep-ex]

  13. [13]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Evidence for Two ExcitedΩ- Hy- perons, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Evidence for Two ExcitedΩ- Hy- perons, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 131903 (2025), arXiv:2411.11648 [hep-ex]

  14. [14]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Observation of theΩ(2012) baryon at the LHC, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Observation of theΩ(2012) baryon at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D112, 092002 (2025), arXiv:2502.18063 [hep-ex]

  15. [15]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of five new narrowΩ 0 c states decaying toΞ + c K −, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of five new narrowΩ 0 c states decaying toΞ + c K −, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 182001 (2017), arXiv:1703.04639 [hep-ex]

  16. [16]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of excitedΩ 0 c baryons in Ω− b →Ξ + c K −π−decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of excitedΩ 0 c baryons in Ω− b →Ξ + c K −π−decays, Phys. Rev. D104, L091102 (2021), arXiv:2107.03419 [hep-ex]

  17. [17]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of NewΩ 0 c States Decaying to theΞ + c K − Final State, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of NewΩ 0 c States Decaying to theΞ + c K − Final State, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 131902 (2023), arXiv:2302.04733 [hep-ex]

  18. [18]

    Yeltonet al.(Belle), Observation of ExcitedΩ c Charmed Baryons ine +e− Collisions, Phys

    J. Yeltonet al.(Belle), Observation of ExcitedΩ c Charmed Baryons ine +e− Collisions, Phys. Rev. D97, 051102 (2018), arXiv:1711.07927 [hep-ex]

  19. [19]

    Xiao and X.-H

    L.-Y . Xiao and X.-H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observedΩ(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D98, 034004 (2018), arXiv:1805.11285 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    Wang, L.-C

    Z.-Y . Wang, L.-C. Gui, Q.-F. L ¨u, L.-Y . Xiao, and X.-H. Zhong, Newly observedΩ(2012)state and strong decays of the low-lyingΩexcitations, Phys. Rev. D98, 114023 (2018), arXiv:1810.08318 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    Liu, K.-L

    M.-S. Liu, K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. L ¨u, and X.-H. Zhong,Ωbaryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D101, 016002 (2020), arXiv:1910.10322 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    M. V . Polyakov, H.-D. Son, B.-D. Sun, and A. Tandogan, Ω(2012) through the looking glass of flavour SU (3), Phys. Lett. B792, 315 (2019), arXiv:1806.04427 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y . Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D105, 094006 (2022), arXiv:2201.10427 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Menapara and A

    C. Menapara and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopic study of strangeness = –3Ω – baryon*, Chin. Phys. C46, 103102 (2022), arXiv:2108.05071 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Wang, Q.-F

    K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. L ¨u, J.-J. Xie, and X.-H. Zhong, To- ward discovering the excitedΩbaryons through nonlep- tonic weak decays ofΩ c, Phys. Rev. D107, 034015 (2023), arXiv:2203.04458 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Zhong, R.-H

    H.-H. Zhong, R.-H. Ni, M.-Y . Chen, X.-H. Zhong, and J.-J. Xie, Further study of within a chiral quark model*, Chin. Phys. C47, 063104 (2023), arXiv:2209.09398 [hep-ph]

  27. [27]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Radial Excitations of the Decuplet Baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 222 (2017), arXiv:1612.03661 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y . Sarac, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the newly discoveredΩ(2012), Phys. Rev. D98, 014031 (2018), arXiv:1806.01626 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y . Sarac, and H. Sundu, Nature of the Ω(2012)through its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 894 (2018), arXiv:1807.02145 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    Su, H.-X

    N. Su, H.-X. Chen, P. Gubler, and A. Hosaka, Investigation on theΩ(2012) from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D110, 034007 (2024), arXiv:2405.06958 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    M. P. Valderrama,Ω(2012)as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D98, 054009 (2018), arXiv:1807.00718 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Lin and B.-S

    Y .-H. Lin and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observedΩ ∗ state, Phys. Rev. D98, 056013 (2018), arXiv:1807.00997 [hep-ph]

  34. [34]

    Huang, M.-Z

    Y . Huang, M.-Z. Liu, J.-X. Lu, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Strong decay modes ¯KΞand ¯KΞπof theΩ(2012)in the ¯KΞ(1530) andηΩmolecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D98, 076012 (2018), arXiv:1807.06485 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    Pavao and E

    R. Pavao and E. Oset, Coupled channels dynamics in the gener- ation of theΩ(2012)resonance, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 857 (2018), arXiv:1808.01950 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Lu, C.-H

    J.-X. Lu, C.-H. Zeng, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Revis- iting theΩ(2012)as a hadronic molecule and its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 361 (2020), arXiv:2003.07588 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    Shen, J.-X

    Q.-H. Shen, J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, X. Liu, and J.-J. Xie, Radia- tive decays of theΩ(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D113, 036014 (2026), arXiv:2510.13623 [hep-ph]

  38. [38]

    Ikeno, G

    N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Molecular picture for theΩ(2012)revisited, Phys. Rev. D101, 094016 (2020), arXiv:2003.07580 [hep-ph]

  39. [39]

    X. Liu, H. Huang, J. Ping, and D. Chen, InvestigatingΩ(2012) as a molecular state, Phys. Rev. C103, 025202 (2021), arXiv:2010.15398 [hep-ph]

  40. [40]

    Song, W.-H

    J. Song, W.-H. Liang, C.-W. Xiao, J. M. Dias, and E. Oset, Test- ing the molecular nature of theΩ(2012)with theψ(3770)→ ¯Ω ¯KΞandψ(3770)→ ¯Ω ¯KΞ ∗(1530)(¯Ω ¯KπΞ)reactions, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1311 (2024), arXiv:2410.23204 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    Hofmann and M

    J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, D-wave baryon resonances with charm from coupled-channel dynamics, Nucl. Phys. A776, 17 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0601249

  42. [42]

    Sarkar, E

    S. Sarkar, E. Oset, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Baryonic res- onances from baryon decuplet-meson octet interaction, Nucl. Phys. A750, 294 (2005), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 780, 90–90 (2006)], arXiv:nucl-th/0407025

  43. [43]

    Xie and L.-S

    J.-J. Xie and L.-S. Geng, TheΩ(2012) as a Hadronic Molecule, Chin. Phys. Lett.41, 081402 (2024), arXiv:2406.17481 [hep- ph]

  44. [44]

    Zeng, J.-X

    C.-H. Zeng, J.-X. Lu, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Theoretical study of theΩ(2012)state in theΩ 0 c → π+Ω(2012)− →π +( ¯KΞ) − andπ +( ¯KΞπ) − decays, Phys. Rev. D102, 076009 (2020), arXiv:2006.15547 [hep-ph]

  45. [45]

    Ikeno, W.-H

    N. Ikeno, W.-H. Liang, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Interpretation of theΩc→π+Ω(2012)→π+(K¯Ξ) relative toΩc→π+K¯Ξ from theΩ(2012) molecular perspective, Phys. Rev. D106, 034022 (2022), arXiv:2204.13396 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Search for a common baryon source in high-multiplicity pp collisions at the LHC, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Search for a common baryon source in high-multiplicity pp collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B811, 8 135849 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 861, 139233 (2025)], arXiv:2004.08018 [nucl-ex]

  47. [47]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Constraining the ¯KNcoupled chan- nel dynamics using femtoscopic correlations at the LHC, Eur

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Constraining the ¯KNcoupled chan- nel dynamics using femtoscopic correlations at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 340 (2023), arXiv:2205.15176 [nucl-ex]

  48. [48]

    Isshiki (STAR), Measurements of p-Ξ,Λ-Λ, andΞ-ΞCor- relation in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC- STAR, EPJ Web Conf.259, 11015 (2022), arXiv:2109.10953 [nucl-ex]

    M. Isshiki (STAR), Measurements of p-Ξ,Λ-Λ, andΞ-ΞCor- relation in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC- STAR, EPJ Web Conf.259, 11015 (2022), arXiv:2109.10953 [nucl-ex]

  49. [49]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS),K 0 S andΛ( ¯Λ) two-particle femto- scopic correlations in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS),K 0 S andΛ( ¯Λ) two-particle femto- scopic correlations in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B857, 138936 (2024), arXiv:2301.05290 [nucl-ex]

  50. [50]

    Aamodtet al.(ALICE), Femtoscopy ofppcollisions at√s= 0.9and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations, Phys

    K. Aamodtet al.(ALICE), Femtoscopy ofppcollisions at√s= 0.9and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations, Phys. Rev. D84, 112004 (2011), arXiv:1101.3665 [hep-ex]

  51. [51]

    Abelevet al.(ALICE), Charged kaon femtoscopic correla- tions inppcollisions at √s= 7TeV, Phys

    B. Abelevet al.(ALICE), Charged kaon femtoscopic correla- tions inppcollisions at √s= 7TeV, Phys. Rev. D87, 052016 (2013), arXiv:1212.5958 [hep-ex]

  52. [52]

    Adamet al.(ALICE), One-dimensional pion, kaon, and pro- ton femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE), One-dimensional pion, kaon, and pro- ton femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C92, 054908 (2015), arXiv:1506.07884 [nucl-ex]

  53. [53]

    Adamet al.(ALICE), Two-pion femtoscopy in p-Pb colli- sions at √sNN = 5.02TeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(ALICE), Two-pion femtoscopy in p-Pb colli- sions at √sNN = 5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C91, 034906 (2015), arXiv:1502.00559 [nucl-ex]

  54. [54]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Study of theΛ-Λinteraction with femtoscopy correlations in pp and p-Pb collisions at the LHC, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Study of theΛ-Λinteraction with femtoscopy correlations in pp and p-Pb collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B797, 134822 (2019), arXiv:1905.07209 [nucl-ex]

  55. [55]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), p-p, p-ΛandΛ-Λcorrelations stud- ied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at √s= 7 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), p-p, p-ΛandΛ-Λcorrelations stud- ied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at √s= 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024001 (2019), arXiv:1805.12455 [nucl-ex]

  56. [56]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Investigation of the p–Σ 0 interac- tion via femtoscopy in pp collisions, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Investigation of the p–Σ 0 interac- tion via femtoscopy in pp collisions, Phys. Lett. B805, 135419 (2020), arXiv:1910.14407 [nucl-ex]

  57. [57]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Scattering studies with low-energy kaon-proton femtoscopy in proton-proton collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 092301 (2020), arXiv:1905.13470 [nucl-ex]

  58. [58]

    Collaborationet al.(ALICE), Unveiling the strong interac- tion among hadrons at the LHC, Nature588, 232 (2020), [Erra- tum: Nature 590, E13 (2021)], arXiv:2005.11495 [nucl-ex]

    A. Collaborationet al.(ALICE), Unveiling the strong interac- tion among hadrons at the LHC, Nature588, 232 (2020), [Erra- tum: Nature 590, E13 (2021)], arXiv:2005.11495 [nucl-ex]

  59. [59]

    Adamczyket al.(STAR),ΛΛCorrelation Function in Au+Au collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR),ΛΛCorrelation Function in Au+Au collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 022301 (2015), arXiv:1408.4360 [nucl-ex]

  60. [60]

    Adamet al.(STAR), The Proton-Ωcorrelation function in Au+Au collisions at √sNN=200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), The Proton-Ωcorrelation function in Au+Au collisions at √sNN=200 GeV, Phys. Lett. B790, 490 (2019), arXiv:1808.02511 [hep-ex]

  61. [61]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y .-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.- S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1 (2025), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep- ph]

  62. [62]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), First Observation of an Attractive Interaction between a Proton and a Cascade Baryon, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), First Observation of an Attractive Interaction between a Proton and a Cascade Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 112002 (2019), arXiv:1904.12198 [nucl-ex]

  63. [63]

    Morita, T

    K. Morita, T. Furumoto, and A. Ohnishi,ΛΛinteraction from relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C91, 024916 (2015), arXiv:1408.6682 [nucl-th]

  64. [64]

    Liu and J.-J

    S.-W. Liu and J.-J. Xie, Studying the KΛstrong interaction us- ing femtoscopic correlation functions and theN ∗(1535), Phys. Rev. D112, 034027 (2025), arXiv:2503.22453 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    Molina, C.-W

    R. Molina, C.-W. Xiao, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, Correlation functions for theN ∗(1535)and the inverse problem, Phys. Rev. D109, 054002 (2024), arXiv:2310.12593 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Liu, J.-X

    Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, Distinguish- ing the spins ofP c(4440)andP c(4457)with femtoscopic correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D108, L031503 (2023), arXiv:2305.19048 [hep-ph]

  67. [67]

    Liu, J.-X

    Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Study of the DK interac- tion with femtoscopic correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D107, 074019 (2023), arXiv:2302.01046 [hep-ph]

  68. [68]

    Albaladejo, A

    M. Albaladejo, A. Feijoo, I. Vida ˜na, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Inverse problem in femtoscopic correlation func- tions: theT cc(3875)+ state, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 187 (2025), arXiv:2307.09873 [hep-ph]

  69. [69]

    Xie, Z.-W

    J.-M. Xie, Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, H. Liang, and L.-S. Geng, Off- shell Chiral Dynamics in theΛ(1405)Resonance andK −p Femtoscopic Correlations, (2026), arXiv:2604.00791 [nucl-th]

  70. [70]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Encarnaci ´on, A. Feijoo, and M. Albaladejo, Sig- natures of theΩ(2012) − state inΞ ∗ ¯KCorrelation Functions, (2026), arXiv:2603.18610 [hep-ph]

  71. [71]

    Y .-Y . Li, A. Feijoo, and E. Oset, TheΩ(2380)as a partner of theΩ(2012), (2026), arXiv:2601.21536 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    Ikeno, W.-H

    N. Ikeno, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, Molecular nature of the Ωc(3120)and its analogy with theΩ(2012), Phys. Rev. D109, 054023 (2024), arXiv:2312.13732 [hep-ph]

  73. [73]

    Liu and J.-J

    S.-W. Liu and J.-J. Xie, Femtoscopic correlation functions for general partial waves: Application to theΛ(1520)resonance, (2026), arXiv:2601.22695 [hep-ph]

  74. [74]

    Aceti and E

    F. Aceti and E. Oset, Wave functions of composite hadron states and relationship to couplings of scattering amplitudes for general partial waves, Phys. Rev. D86, 014012 (2012), arXiv:1202.4607 [hep-ph]

  75. [75]

    Gamermann, J

    D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Cou- plings in coupled channels versus wave functions: application to the X(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D81, 014029 (2010), arXiv:0911.4407 [hep-ph]

  76. [76]

    Yamagata-Sekihara, J

    J. Yamagata-Sekihara, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Couplings in cou- pled channels versus wave functions in the case of resonances: application to the twoΛ(1405)states, Phys. Rev. D83, 014003 (2011), arXiv:1007.3923 [hep-ph]

  77. [77]

    Xie, B.-S

    J.-J. Xie, B.-S. Zou, and H.-C. Chiang, The Role ofN ∗(1535) inpp→ppϕandπ −p→nϕreactions, Phys. Rev. C77, 015206 (2008), arXiv:0705.3950 [nucl-th]

  78. [78]

    D. L. Mihaylov, V . Mantovani Sarti, O. W. Arnold, L. Fabbi- etti, B. Hohlweger, and A. M. Mathis, A femtoscopic Correla- tion Analysis Tool using the Schr¨odinger equation (CATS), Eur. Phys. J. C78, 394 (2018), arXiv:1802.08481 [hep-ph]

  79. [79]

    Ge, Z.-W

    D.-L. Ge, Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Deuteron- deuteron interaction and correlation function, Phys. Rev. C112, 034003 (2025), arXiv:2502.18872 [nucl-th]

  80. [80]

    Encarnaci ´on, A

    P. Encarnaci ´on, A. Feijoo, V . M. Sarti, and A. Ramos, Femto- scopic study of theS=−1meson-baryon interaction:K −p, π−Λ, andK +Ξ− correlations, Phys. Rev. D111, 114013 (2025), arXiv:2412.20880 [hep-ph]