arxiv: 2604.26033 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det

Recognition: unknown

A new diffuse reflector filament for additive manufacturing of 3D printing finely-segmented plastic scintillator

A. Boyarintsev, A. de Roeck, A. Krech, A. Rubbia, B. Grynyov, B. Li, D. Sgalaberna, E. Boillat, J. W\"uthrich, M. Sibilyev, N. Karavaeva, S. Berns, S. Hugon, S. Minenko, T. Dieminger, T. Sibilieva, T. Weber, U. Kose, X. Zhao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det

keywords 3D printingplastic scintillatorreflective filamentadditive manufacturinglight crosstalkFDMTiO2PTFE

0 comments

The pith

A new 3D-printable reflective filament enables compact segmented plastic scintillators with lower crosstalk and higher light yield than previous printed versions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops and tests a white reflective filament made from polycarbonate and polymethyl methacrylate loaded with titanium dioxide and polytetrafluoroethylene. Layers printed by fused deposition modeling were measured for reflection and transmittance, then a small prototype scintillator was printed by fused injection modeling and exposed to cosmic rays. The results show reduced optical crosstalk and increased light yield compared with earlier 3D-printed scintillators, reaching performance levels close to conventionally made plastic scintillators. If the approach holds, it would let experimenters build finely segmented detectors in custom shapes without machining, lowering barriers to modular detector design.

Core claim

The central claim is that the new TiO2- and PTFE-loaded PC/PMMA filament, when extruded into reflective layers by FDM, provides sufficient diffuse reflectivity to separate scintillator segments. When a prototype detector is printed by FIM and read out with cosmic rays, the measured light yield and inter-segment crosstalk match or exceed values from standard plastic scintillators and earlier printed attempts.

What carries the argument

The TiO2- and PTFE-loaded PC/PMMA reflective filament printed by FDM to form diffuse optical barriers between scintillator voxels.

If this is right

Compact modular detectors can be produced by additive manufacturing instead of machining.
Light crosstalk drops and light yield rises relative to prior 3D-printed scintillators.
Finely segmented geometries become practical without custom molds or cutting tools.
Performance reaches levels comparable to conventional plastic scintillator detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Fully printed detector assemblies that combine scintillator, reflector, and light guides in one build could become routine.
On-demand production of custom-shaped detectors may reduce lead times and costs for small experiments.
The same filament approach might extend to other optical components such as light pipes or wavelength shifters in particle detectors.

Load-bearing premise

That optical tests on flat printed layers and cosmic-ray data from one small prototype will predict light collection and crosstalk in larger detectors operated for long periods under varying conditions.

What would settle it

A larger printed detector module that shows crosstalk above a few percent or light yield below the prototype level under realistic readout would falsify the claim of analogous performance.

read the original abstract

This study presents the development and the characterization of novel white reflective filaments suitable for additive manufacturing of finely segmented plastic scintillators. The filament is based on polycarbonate (PC) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymers loaded with titanium dioxide (TiO$_2$) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to enhance reflectivity. A range of filament compositions and thicknesses was evaluated through optical reflection and transmittance measurements of reflective layers made with the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technique. A 3D-segmented plastic scintillator prototype was made with fused injection modeling (FIM) and tested with cosmic rays to assess the light yield and the optical crosstalk. The results demonstrate the feasibility of producing compact and modular 3D-printed scintillator detectors with a performance analogous to standard plastic scintillator detectors. Owing to the improved optical properties of the new reflector filament, a lower light crosstalk and a higher light yield, compared to past works, is obtained.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New TiO2/PTFE-loaded PC/PMMA filament gives measurable gains in light yield and crosstalk for small 3D-printed segmented scintillators, but scaling and durability remain untested.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this group has produced a specific reflective filament for FDM and FIM printing that improves optical performance in finely segmented plastic scintillators. Flat-layer tests show decent reflectivity and transmittance across compositions and thicknesses, and the single small cosmic-ray prototype delivered higher light yield with lower crosstalk than earlier printed versions, reaching levels close to standard detectors.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the development and characterization of a new white reflective filament made from polycarbonate (PC) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) loaded with titanium dioxide (TiO2) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). This filament is intended for additive manufacturing of finely segmented plastic scintillators using fused deposition modeling (FDM) for reflective layers and fused injection modeling (FIM) for the scintillator prototype. Optical measurements of reflection and transmittance were conducted on flat printed layers with different compositions and thicknesses. A small 3D-segmented scintillator prototype was tested with cosmic rays to evaluate light yield and optical crosstalk. The authors claim that this approach produces detectors with performance analogous to standard plastic scintillators, with improved light yield and reduced crosstalk compared to previous 3D-printed efforts.

Significance. This work has potential significance for the field of particle detector instrumentation by demonstrating a practical method for 3D printing segmented scintillators with custom geometries. The experimental validation through optical tests and cosmic-ray measurements on a working prototype is a strength, providing concrete evidence of feasibility. If the performance scales to larger systems, it could enable more modular and cost-effective detector designs for applications in high-energy physics experiments and beyond. The paper credits the direct measurements and prototype demonstration as key to supporting the feasibility claim.

major comments (2)

Cosmic-ray test results: The central claim that the prototype achieves performance analogous to standard detectors with higher light yield and lower crosstalk relies on the cosmic-ray measurements of one small FIM-printed prototype. However, the manuscript does not provide a direct side-by-side comparison with a reference detector using commercial reflectors under identical conditions, nor does it report quantitative values with uncertainties for the light yield and crosstalk. This makes it challenging to evaluate the improvement over past works and the scalability to full-scale detectors.
Optical characterization: The reflection and transmittance measurements are performed on flat layers, but the paper does not include tests on the optical properties within the complex 3D geometries of the segmented scintillator, such as multiple internal interfaces in a multi-segment array. This is a load-bearing assumption for the claim that the filament enables finely-segmented detectors with low crosstalk.

minor comments (3)

The abstract mentions 'a range of filament compositions' but does not specify the exact percentages of TiO2 and PTFE or the number of compositions tested; including these details would improve clarity.
The manuscript would benefit from additional references to prior work on 3D-printed scintillators to better contextualize the improvements in light yield and crosstalk.
Ensure that all figures showing optical data include error bars and clear legends for different compositions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to strengthen the quantitative support and discussion of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Cosmic-ray test results: The central claim that the prototype achieves performance analogous to standard detectors with higher light yield and lower crosstalk relies on the cosmic-ray measurements of one small FIM-printed prototype. However, the manuscript does not provide a direct side-by-side comparison with a reference detector using commercial reflectors under identical conditions, nor does it report quantitative values with uncertainties for the light yield and crosstalk. This makes it challenging to evaluate the improvement over past works and the scalability to full-scale detectors.

Authors: We agree that a direct side-by-side comparison would strengthen the claims. Our study prioritized demonstrating the new filament in an FIM-printed prototype, so such a comparison was outside the immediate scope. The manuscript already reports light yield and crosstalk from the cosmic-ray tests; in revision we will explicitly quote the numerical values with uncertainties and add a comparison table against both literature values for standard plastic scintillators and prior 3D-printed efforts. We will also expand the discussion of scalability limitations and the additional engineering steps required for larger systems. revision: partial
Referee: Optical characterization: The reflection and transmittance measurements are performed on flat layers, but the paper does not include tests on the optical properties within the complex 3D geometries of the segmented scintillator, such as multiple internal interfaces in a multi-segment array. This is a load-bearing assumption for the claim that the filament enables finely-segmented detectors with low crosstalk.

Authors: The flat-layer measurements establish the intrinsic reflectivity and transmittance of the material. Direct validation in the actual geometry is provided by the cosmic-ray test of the multi-segment prototype, which exhibited the reported low crosstalk. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing how the flat-sample results translate to the segmented structure, including any simplifying assumptions and the empirical support from the prototype data. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental development with direct measurements

full rationale

This paper is an experimental materials-development study. It fabricates filaments of varying TiO2/PTFE-loaded PC/PMMA compositions, prints flat layers by FDM, measures their reflectance and transmittance as functions of thickness and loading, prints one small segmented scintillator prototype by FIM, and records cosmic-ray light yield and crosstalk. All performance claims are grounded in these direct laboratory measurements; no equations, fitted parameters, model predictions, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce to the input data by construction. Self-citations to prior work on similar filaments are present but are not load-bearing for any derivation. The extrapolation concern raised by the skeptic is a question of external validity, not circularity in the reported chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No theoretical derivations or free parameters; the work is purely experimental development and characterization. Standard assumptions about polymer processing and optical measurement techniques are used but not invented for this paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1037 out tokens · 40604 ms · 2026-05-07T13:48:19.777014+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Betancourt, A

C. Betancourt, A. Blondel, R. Brundler, A. Daetwyler, Y. Favre, D. Gascon et al.,Application of large area SiPMs for the readout of a plastic scintillator based timing detector,JINST12(2017) P11023 [arXiv:1709.08972]

work page arXiv 2017
[2]

Korzenev et al.,A 4𝜋time-of-flight detector for the ND280/T2K upgrade,JINST17(2022) P01016 [2109.03078]

A. Korzenev et al.,A 4𝜋time-of-flight detector for the ND280/T2K upgrade,JINST17(2022) P01016 [2109.03078]

work page arXiv 2022
[3]

Amaudruz et al.,The T2K Fine-Grained Detectors,Nucl

P.-A. Amaudruz et al.,The T2K Fine-Grained Detectors,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A696(2012) 1 [1204.3666]. [4]MINERvAcollaboration,Design, Calibration, and Performance of the MINERvA Detector,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A743(2014) 130 [arXiv:1305.5199]. [5]MINOScollaboration,The Magnetized steel and scintillator calorimeters of the MINOS experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth...

work page arXiv 2012
[4]

Allan et al.,The Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the T2K Near Detector ND280,JINST8(2013) P10019 [1308.3445]

D. Allan et al.,The Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the T2K Near Detector ND280,JINST8(2013) P10019 [1308.3445]

work page arXiv 2013
[5]

Joram, U

C. Joram, U. Uwer, B.D. Leverington, T. Kirn, S. Bachmann, R.J. Ekelhof et al.,LHCb Scintillating Fibre Tracker Engineering Design Review Report: Fibres, Mats and Modules, Tech. Rep. LHCb-PUB-2015-008, CERN-LHCb-PUB-2015-008, CERN, Geneva (2015)

2015
[6]

Andreev et al.,A high-granularity plastic scintillator tile hadronic calorimeter with APD readout for a linear collider detector,Nucl

V. Andreev et al.,A high-granularity plastic scintillator tile hadronic calorimeter with APD readout for a linear collider detector,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A564(2006) 144. [9]SoLidcollaboration,A novel segmented-scintillator antineutrino detector,JINST12(2017) P04024 [1703.01683]

work page arXiv 2006
[7]

Blondel et al., A fully active fine grained detector with three readout views, JINST13(2018) P02006 [1707.01785]

A. Blondel et al.,A fully active fine grained detector with three readout views,JINST13(2018) P02006 [1707.01785]. [11]T2Kcollaboration,The Super Fine-Grained Detector for the T2K neutrino oscillation experiment, 2603.14921

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

T. Kikawa,The superfgd for the upgraded t2k near detector — operation and performance,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment1080(2025) 170616

2025
[9]

Agarwal et al.,Total neutron cross-section measurement on CH with a novel 3D-projection scintillator detector,Phys

A. Agarwal et al.,Total neutron cross-section measurement on CH with a novel 3D-projection scintillator detector,Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137843 [2207.02685]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

Gwon et al.,Neutron detection and application with a novel 3D-projection scintillator tracker in the future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments,Phys

S. Gwon et al.,Neutron detection and application with a novel 3D-projection scintillator tracker in the future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 032012 [2211.17037]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Harper and E

C. Harper and E. Petrie,Plastics Materials and Processes: A Concise Encyclopedia, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (09, 2003), 10.1002/0471459216

work page doi:10.1002/0471459216 2003
[12]

Appel, G

R. Appel, G. Atoyan, B. Bassalleck, E. Battiste, D. Bergman, K. Bösiger et al.,A large acceptance, high-resolution detector for rare k+-decay experiments,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment479(2002) 349

2002
[13]

Thevenin, L

J. Thevenin, L. Allemand, E. Locci, P. Micolon, S. Palanque and M. Spiro,Extruded polystyrene, a new scintillator,Nuclear Instruments and Methods169(1980) 53. – 10 –

1980
[14]

Pla-Dalmau, A.D

A. Pla-Dalmau, A.D. Bross and K.L. Mellott,Low-cost extruded plastic scintillator,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A466(2001) 482

2001
[15]

Boyarintsev et al.,Demonstrating a single-block 3D-segmented plastic-scintillator detector,JINST 16(2021) P12010 [2108.11897]

A. Boyarintsev et al.,Demonstrating a single-block 3D-segmented plastic-scintillator detector,JINST 16(2021) P12010 [2108.11897]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Berns, A

S. Berns, A. Boyarintsev, S. Hugon, U. Kose, D. Sgalaberna, A. De Roeck et al.,A novel polystyrene-based scintillator production process involving additive manufacturing,JINST15(2020) 10 [arXiv:2011.09859]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Berns, E

S. Berns, E. Boillat, A. Boyarintsev, A.D. Roeck, S. Dolan, A. Gendotti et al.,Additive manufacturing of fine-granularity optically-isolated plastic scintillator elements,Journal of Instrumentation17 (2022) P10045

2022
[18]

Sibilieva, A

T. Sibilieva, A. Boyarintsev, A. Krech et al.,Development of reflective filaments based on polycarbonate with the addition of PTFE and TiO2 for 3D printing of finely segmented plastic scintillators,Functional Materials31 (4)(2024) 646

2024
[19]

Sibilieva et al.,3D printing of inorganic scintillator-based particle detectors,JINST18(2023) P03007 [2212.13394]

T. Sibilieva et al.,3D printing of inorganic scintillator-based particle detectors,JINST18(2023) P03007 [2212.13394]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Lynch, T

N. Lynch, T. Monajemi and J.L. Robar,Characterization of novel 3d printed plastic scintillation dosimeters,Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express6(2020) 055014

2020
[21]

A. Barr, C. Da Vià, M. Binte Shawkat, M. Taylor, S. Watts, J. Allison et al.,A neutron sensitive detector using 3d-printed scintillators,Journal of Instrumentation20(2025) P10012

2025
[22]

Mishnayot, M

Y. Mishnayot, M. Layani, I. Cooperstein, S. Magdassi and G. Ron,Three-dimensional printing of scintillating materials,Review of Scientific Instruments85(2014) 085102 [https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891703]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4891703 2014
[23]

Y. Kim, N. Zaitseva, M.J. Ford, L. Carman, A. Glenn, M. Febbraro et al.,3d printable polyvinyltoluene-based plastic scintillators with pulse shape discrimination,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment1055(2023) 168537

2023
[24]

Chandler, D.H

C. Chandler, D.H. Porcincula, M.J. Ford, C. Hook, X. Zhang, J. Brodsky et al.,Plastic scintillators via rapid photoinitiated cationic polymerization of vinyltoluene,ACS Applied Polymer Materials4 (2022) 4069 [https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c00316]

work page doi:10.1021/acsapm.2c00316 2022
[25]

Frandsen, M

B.G. Frandsen, M. Febbraro, T. Ruland, T.W. Stephens, P.A. Hausladen, J.J. Manfredi et al.,Fast-, light-cured scintillating plastic for 3d-printing applications,Journal of Nuclear Engineering4(2023) 241

2023
[26]

geon Kim, S

D. geon Kim, S. Lee, J. Park, J. Son, T.H. Kim, Y.H. Kim et al.,Performance of 3d printed plastic scintillators for gamma-ray detection,Nuclear Engineering and Technology52(2020) 2910

2020
[27]

Stowell, Z

P. Stowell, Z. Kutz, S. Fargher and L. Thompson,3d printing neutron detectors using scintillating bn/zns resin,Journal of Instrumentation16(2021) P01003

2021
[28]

Doležal, J.J

T.D. Doležal, J.J. Manfredi, B.G. Frandsen, J.E. Bevins, C. Gautam, T.W. Stephens et al., Manufacturing and characterization of a boron-loaded fast-cured plastic organic scintillator,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment1056(2023) 168602

2023
[29]

Chandler, D.H

C. Chandler, D.H. Porcincula, M.J. Ford, T.J. Kolibaba, B. Fein-Ashley, J. Brodsky et al.,Influence of fluorescent dopants on the vat photopolymerization of acrylate-based plastic scintillators for applicationinneutron/gammapulseshapediscrimination,AdditiveManufacturing73(2023)103688. – 11 –

2023
[30]

Weber, A

T. Weber, A. Boyarintsev, U. Kose, B. Li, D. Sgalaberna, T. Sibilieva et al.,Additive manufacturing of a 3d-segmented plastic scintillator detector for tracking and calorimetry of elementary particles, Communications Engineering4(2025) 41

2025
[31]

Li et al.,Beam test results of a fully 3D-printed plastic scintillator particle detector prototype, JINST20(2025) P04008 [2412.10174]

B. Li et al.,Beam test results of a fully 3D-printed plastic scintillator particle detector prototype, JINST20(2025) P04008 [2412.10174]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Extruder Noztek Pro HT

“Extruder Noztek Pro HT.”https://noztek.com/product/noztek-pro/
[33]

Noztek Filament Winder 1.0

“Noztek Filament Winder 1.0.” https://noztek.com/product/noztek-filament-winder-1-0/
[34]

3D printer Creatbot F430

“3D printer Creatbot F430.”https://www.creatbot.com/en/creatbot-f430.html
[35]

Rosa3D filament

“Rosa3D filament.”https://rosa3dfrance.fr
[36]

CAEN DT5202

“CAEN DT5202.”https://www.caen.it/products/dt5202/. A Contributions A.K.,T.S.,A.B.,B.G.,N.K.,S.M.,M.S.conceptualized,developedandproducedthenewfilament, performed the formal analysis, made the test samples for transmittance and reflectivity tests and performed the measurements. They also provided the equipment at ISMA. T.W. 3D printed the SuperLayer proto...