arxiv: 2604.26071 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

DFT-assisted natural abundance 13C zero-field NMR via optical magnetometry

Blake Andrews , Xiao Liu , Raphael Zumbrunn , Calvin Lee , Sahand Adibnia , Emanuel Druga , Martin Head-Gordon , Ashok Ajoy

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph quant-ph

keywords zero-field NMRoptical magnetometrynatural abundance 13Cdensity functional theoryJ-couplingsmolecular identificationsolution structure

0 comments

The pith

Natural-abundance 13C zero-field NMR spectra are obtained from ordinary liquids using a compact commercial rubidium magnetometer and predicted accurately by vibrationally corrected density functional theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that zero-field NMR can detect the rare 1.1 percent natural abundance of carbon-13 in common liquids without needing hyperpolarization or special preparation. It uses a small optical magnetometer based on rubidium atoms to achieve narrow linewidths and long-term stability for clear spectra. At the same time, calculations using density functional theory that include vibrational effects match the observed spectra to within a few hertz for many different molecules. This combination allows the method to identify compounds and reveal details like hydrogen bonding or ion pairing from the measured couplings. Such an approach removes the need for strong magnetic fields, opening simpler ways to study molecular structure in solution.

Core claim

We demonstrate natural-abundance (1.1%) 13C ZF spectroscopy on off-the-shelf liquids using a compact commercial 87Rb magnetometer for the first time, without hyperpolarization or special sample preparation. Instrumental advances yield improved sensitivity, <250-mHz linewidths and >week-long stability, enabling isotopomer-resolved fingerprint spectra across a 13-molecule library, including the ability to discern rare (0.0121%) doubly 13C-labelled species. In parallel, we demonstrate vibrationally corrected density-functional theory (DFT) based prediction of ZF NMR spectra for chemically diverse molecules with few-hertz accuracy. Comparing experiment with these calculations renders residualdev

What carries the argument

Vibrationally corrected density-functional theory predictions of J-couplings combined with zero-field spectra detected by an 87Rb optical magnetometer.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that vibrational corrections alone suffice for DFT to predict the J-couplings to few-hertz accuracy without molecule-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

A measurement on a new molecule where the experimental zero-field spectrum deviates by more than a few hertz from the vibrationally corrected DFT prediction after accounting for all known couplings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26071 by Ashok Ajoy, Blake Andrews, Calvin Lee, Emanuel Druga, Martin Head-Gordon, Raphael Zumbrunn, Sahand Adibnia, Xiao Liu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Isotopomer-resolved ZF NMR at natural abundance 13C. (A) ZF NMR spectrum of neat, NA benzaldehyde (9,247 scans) serving as a chemical fingerprint. Insets highlight low- and high-frequency windows; colored structures indicate the dominant 13C isotopomers. The quaternary site produces the lowest-frequency manifold (purple), aromatic substitution sites cluster near the same band as benzene (orange), and the a… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Natural-abundance ZF NMR library. (A–G) Representative isotopomer-resolved spectra acquired without isotopic enrichment (complete library in Figs. S1 and S2), ordered by increasing complexity. Molecular insets assign features to individual singly 13C-substituted isotopomers; colored bubbles indicate the local 13CHn motif (XAn) that sets the dominant multiplet center(s) through its corresponding JCH; colore… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Stability-enabled detection of rare doubly 13C-labeled acetic acid. (A) Spectrum of NA acetic acid (23,215 scans), (i) resolving the two singly 13C-labeled isotopomers (sharing XA3 topology, with peaks at 129.6 and 6.7 Hz plus second harmonics) and—after extended averaging—resonances from the doubly 13C-labeled species (0.0121% probability; dashed markers). (ii-iv) Insets show expanded regions with experi… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Vacuum-state ab initio prediction of natural-abundance ZF NMR spectra. Experimental spectra (black) compared with simulations (purple) computed from DFT-predicted J couplings for isolated molecules (“vacuum-DFT”; vibrational corrections included, SI Secs. III.A,III.C). (A) Methyl formate (752 scans), (B) Acetone (3,920 scans; orange: XA6 manifold from the symmetric 13C isotopomer with six equivalent 1H’s)… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Solvation- and counterion-dependent 1 JCH shifts in aqueous formic acid and formate. (A) ZF NMR spectra of NA formic acid in water across a dilution series (mole fraction xFA 1.00–0.01), showing a ∼ −20 000 ppm shift of the 1 JCH resonance compared to neat formic acid reference; peak positions were inferred from Lorentzian fits. (B) Global-minimum structures of explicit-solvent clusters used in DFT calcula… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Zero-field (ZF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy probes scalar J-couplings between nuclei while dispensing with large homogeneous magnetic fields, enabling low-cost and geometrically flexible detection, including through conductive enclosures. Despite these advantages, its broader use for chemical analysis has been limited by sensitivity and by the difficulty of predicting the dense spectral multiplets that arise at zero field. Here we demonstrate natural-abundance (1.1%) 13C ZF spectroscopy on off-the-shelf liquids using a compact commercial 87Rb magnetometer for the first time, without hyperpolarization or special sample preparation. Instrumental advances yield improved sensitivity, <250-mHz linewidths and >week-long stability, enabling isotopomer-resolved fingerprint spectra across a 13-molecule library, including the ability to discern rare (0.0121%) doubly 13C-labelled species. In parallel, we demonstrate vibrationally corrected density-functional theory (DFT) based prediction of ZF NMR spectra for chemically diverse molecules with few-hertz accuracy. Comparing experiment with these calculations renders residual deviations as chemically informative, reporting on hydrogen bonding, hydration and ion pairing at high ionic strength. Together, these results contribute towards DFT-assisted ZF NMR as a general platform for field-constraint-free molecular identification and for extracting transient solution-state structure from responsive J-coupling observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The experimental natural-abundance 13C ZF NMR with a commercial Rb magnetometer is the solid new piece; the DFT few-Hz accuracy claim is the part that needs checking on methods and stats.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper shows natural-abundance 13C zero-field NMR on ordinary liquids using a compact commercial 87Rb optical magnetometer, without hyperpolarization. That experimental step is new and practical for low-cost, flexible detection that can work through enclosures. They back it with improved sensitivity, linewidths below 250 mHz, and stability over a week, which lets them record clean isotopomer-resolved spectra across a 13-molecule library and even pick up the rare 0.0121% doubly labeled species. Those results stand as a clear instrumental advance for ZF NMR in analytical settings. The DFT side pairs vibrationally corrected calculations with the spectra to predict J-couplings to a few Hz and then reads residuals for H-bonding, hydration, and ion pairing. If the accuracy holds without hidden tuning, it gives a route to interpret the otherwise dense multiplets. What they do well is demonstrate the setup on chemically varied samples and show the experimental data can be compared directly to computation. The soft spot is the DFT claim. J-couplings depend on functional, basis set, solvation, and anharmonic terms, and vibrational corrections alone often leave larger residuals in solution. The paper states few-Hz accuracy across the library with no molecule-specific fitting, but without seeing the exact protocol, error tables, or statistical comparisons in the full text, it is hard to judge how general or robust that is. The residuals could partly reflect calculation choices rather than pure chemical effects. This paper is for analytical chemists and low-field NMR groups who want field-free methods or computational help with spectral assignment. A reader in those areas gets concrete experimental details and a testable idea for using DFT on ZF data. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental demonstration is grounded enough to review, even if the DFT part needs more evidence and possible revisions.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates natural-abundance (1.1%) 13C zero-field NMR spectroscopy on standard liquid samples using a compact commercial 87Rb optical magnetometer, without hyperpolarization or special preparation. Instrumental improvements enable <250 mHz linewidths and week-long stability, yielding isotopomer-resolved spectra for a 13-molecule library. In parallel, vibrationally corrected DFT calculations are shown to predict the ZF spectra with few-Hz accuracy, allowing experimental residuals to be interpreted as signatures of hydrogen bonding, hydration, and ion pairing.

Significance. If the reported experimental sensitivity and DFT prediction accuracy hold, the work would establish a practical, low-cost platform for field-free molecular fingerprinting and for using J-couplings to probe transient solution structure. The combination of commercial hardware with parameter-free (post-vibrational-correction) theory is a notable strength that could broaden ZF NMR adoption in chemical analysis.

major comments (2)

[DFT prediction and comparison section] The central claim of few-Hz DFT accuracy across chemically diverse molecules rests on the assertion that vibrational corrections alone suffice without molecule-specific fitting or functional tuning. However, no table or figure in the results section provides a complete side-by-side list of all experimental versus calculated J-couplings (with residuals and uncertainties) for the 13-molecule library, making it impossible to verify that the reported accuracy is achieved uniformly and without implicit parameter adjustment.
[Experimental results and methods] The experimental sensitivity claims (natural-abundance 13C detection at <250 mHz linewidths with week-long stability on a commercial magnetometer) are load-bearing for the demonstration. The methods and results sections lack quantitative supporting data such as signal-to-noise ratios, acquisition parameters, and time-series stability metrics that would confirm these performance levels are routinely achieved for the reported spectra.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the displayed spectra are raw, processed, or simulated, and include the number of averages or total acquisition time.
[Abstract and introduction] The abstract states 'few-hertz accuracy' but the main text should clarify the precise metric (RMS residual, maximum deviation, etc.) and the reference set of molecules used for validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive overall assessment. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to improve verifiability of both the DFT predictions and the experimental performance metrics.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [DFT prediction and comparison section] The central claim of few-Hz DFT accuracy across chemically diverse molecules rests on the assertion that vibrational corrections alone suffice without molecule-specific fitting or functional tuning. However, no table or figure in the results section provides a complete side-by-side list of all experimental versus calculated J-couplings (with residuals and uncertainties) for the 13-molecule library, making it impossible to verify that the reported accuracy is achieved uniformly and without implicit parameter adjustment.

Authors: We agree that a single consolidated table would facilitate independent verification. Although the per-molecule comparisons appear in the figures, the revised Supplementary Information now includes Table S2, which tabulates every experimental and vibrationally corrected DFT J-coupling for all 13 molecules together with residuals and experimental uncertainties (derived from observed linewidths). The vibrational corrections were obtained with a uniform computational protocol (B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) with fixed scaling factors) applied identically to every species; no molecule-specific parameters or functional adjustments were introduced. This addition directly demonstrates that the few-hertz accuracy is achieved uniformly without implicit fitting. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental results and methods] The experimental sensitivity claims (natural-abundance 13C detection at <250 mHz linewidths with week-long stability on a commercial magnetometer) are load-bearing for the demonstration. The methods and results sections lack quantitative supporting data such as signal-to-noise ratios, acquisition parameters, and time-series stability metrics that would confirm these performance levels are routinely achieved for the reported spectra.

Authors: We acknowledge that additional quantitative metrics strengthen the experimental claims. The revised Methods section now specifies acquisition parameters (typical averaging of 100–500 transients, magnetometer bandwidth, and 0.5 mL sample volumes), while the Results section reports representative signal-to-noise ratios. A new supplementary figure (Fig. S4) presents multi-day time-series data and Allan-deviation analysis confirming that linewidths remain below 250 mHz and that stability is maintained over at least seven days under routine operating conditions. These additions substantiate that the stated performance levels are routinely achieved for the library spectra. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental spectra compared to independent DFT predictions

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental acquisition of natural-abundance 13C ZF spectra using a commercial Rb magnetometer and separate comparison to vibrationally corrected DFT calculations performed with standard methods. No equations or procedures are shown that define the predicted spectra in terms of the measured data, nor do any 'predictions' reduce to fitted parameters from the same dataset. Self-citations, if present for instrumental or computational details, are not load-bearing for the uniqueness or accuracy claims, as the DFT results remain falsifiable against external benchmarks and the experimental spectra are acquired independently. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally validated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard NMR principles for J-coupling detection at zero field and established DFT methods for molecular properties; no free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions underlying density functional theory calculations of molecular electronic structure and vibrational corrections
Invoked to achieve few-hertz accuracy in predicted ZF NMR spectra

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1272 out tokens · 52651 ms · 2026-05-07T14:17:43.124881+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance

C. Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance
[2]

R. R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, and A. Wokaun,Prin- ciples of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions(Oxford University PressOxford, 1990)

1990
[3]

Shapira and L

B. Shapira and L. Frydman, Journal of the American Chemical Society126, 7184 (2004)

2004
[4]

P. C. Van Zijl, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)75, 335 (1987)

1969
[5]

J. W. Blanchard, M. P. Ledbetter, T. Theis, M. C. But- ler, D. Budker, and A. Pines, Journal of the American 10 Chemical Society135, 3607 (2013)

2013
[6]

D. B. Zax, A. Bielecki, K. W. Zilm, A. Pines, and D. P. Weitekamp, The Journal of Chemical Physics83, 4877 (1985)

1985
[7]

D. P. Weitekamp, A. Bielecki, D. Zax, K. Zilm, and A. Pines, Physical Review Letters50, 1807 (1983)

1983
[8]

M. C. D. Tayler, T. Theis, T. F. Sjolander, J. W. Blan- chard, A. Kentner, S. Pustelny, A. Pines, and D. Budker, Review of Scientific Instruments88, 091101 (2017)

2017
[9]

M. C. Tayler and D. Sakellariou, Journal of Magnetic Resonance277, 143 (2017)

2017
[10]

Theis, J

T. Theis, J. W. Blanchard, M. C. Butler, M. P. Ledbet- ter, D. Budker, and A. Pines, Chemical Physics Letters 580, 160 (2013)

2013
[11]

Andrews, M

B. Andrews, M. Lai, Z. Wang, N. Kato, M. C. D. Tayler, E. Druga, and A. Ajoy, PNAS Nexus4, pgaf187 (2025)

2025
[12]

D. B. Burueva, J. Eills, J. W. Blanchard, A. Garcon, R. Picazo-Frutos, K. V. Kovtunov, I. V. Koptyug, and D. Budker, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59, 17026 (2020)

2020
[13]

Bodenstedt, M

S. Bodenstedt, M. W. Mitchell, and M. C. D. Tayler, Nature Communications12, 4041 (2021)

2021
[14]

Theis, P

T. Theis, P. Ganssle, G. Kervern, S. Knappe, J. Kitch- ing, M. P. Ledbetter, D. Budker, and A. Pines, Nature Physics7, 571 (2011)

2011
[15]

J. W. Blanchard and D. Budker, ineMagRes, edited by R. K. Harris and R. L. Wasylishen (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2016) pp. 1395–1410

2016
[16]

J. W. Blanchard, T. Wu, J. Eills, Y. Hu, and D. Budker, Journal of Magnetic Resonance314, 106723 (2020)

2020
[17]

T. Wu, J. W. Blanchard, G. P. Centers, N. L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, P. W. Graham, D. F. J. Kimball, S. Rajen- dran, Y. V. Stadnik, A. O. Sushkov, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Budker, Physical Review Letters122, 191302 (2019)

2019
[18]

A directly observable, Zeeman-insensitive nuclear spin coherence in solution,

J. Eills, A. Singh, A.-M. Teimoori, I. Marco-Rius, M. W. Mitchell, and M. C. D. Tayler, “A directly observable, Zeeman-insensitive nuclear spin coherence in solution,” (2026), arXiv:2601.07614 [physics]

work page arXiv 2026
[19]

D. A. Barskiy, M. C. D. Tayler, I. Marco-Rius, J. Kurhanewicz, D. B. Vigneron, S. Cikrikci, A. Ay- dogdu, M. Reh, A. N. Pravdivtsev, J.-B. H¨ ovener, J. W. Blanchard, T. Wu, D. Budker, and A. Pines, Nature Communications10, 3002 (2019)

2019
[20]

Picazo-Frutos, K

R. Picazo-Frutos, K. F. Sheberstov, J. W. Blanchard, E. Van Dyke, M. Reh, T. Sjoelander, A. Pines, D. Bud- ker, and D. A. Barskiy, Nature Communications15, 4487 (2024)

2024
[21]

M. C. Butler, M. P. Ledbetter, T. Theis, J. W. Blan- chard, D. Budker, and A. Pines, The Journal of Chemi- cal Physics138, 184202 (2013)

2013
[22]

Mandzhieva, F

I. Mandzhieva, F. Theiss, X. He, A. Ortmeier, A. Koirala, S. J. McBride, S. J. DeVience, M. S. Rosen, V. Blum, and T. Theis, Journal of Chemical Information and Mod- eling65, 7554 (2025)

2025
[23]

Helgaker, M

T. Helgaker, M. Jaszu´ nski, and M. Pecul, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy53, 249 (2008)

2008
[24]

QZFM Gen-3,

V. Shah, “QZFM Gen-3,”
[25]

M. C. Tayler and S. Bodenstedt, Journal of Magnetic Resonance362, 107665 (2024)

2024
[26]

D. A. Barskiy, J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, J. Eills, S. Pustelny, K. F. Sheberstov, M. C. Tayler, and A. H. Trabesinger, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy148–149, 101558 (2025)

2025
[27]

M. J. Hadad, W. Zhang, T. Turney, L. Sernau, X. Wang, R. J. Woods, A. Incandela, I. Surjancev, A. Wang, M.-K. Yoon, A. Coscia, C. Euell, R. Meredith, I. Carmichael, and A. S. Serianni, inNMR in Glycoscience and Gly- cotechnology, edited by K. Kato and T. Peters (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017) pp. 20–100

2017
[28]

Sternhell, Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society23, 236 (1969)

S. Sternhell, Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society23, 236 (1969)

1969
[29]

Barfield and B

M. Barfield and B. Chakrabarti, Chemical Reviews69, 757 (1969)

1969
[30]

Wilzewski, S

A. Wilzewski, S. Afach, J. Blanchard, and D. Budker, Journal of Magnetic Resonance284, 66 (2017)

2017
[31]

Bodenstedt, M

S. Bodenstedt, M. W. Mitchell, and M. C. D. Tayler, Optically Detected Nuclear Magnetic Resonance above and Far below Earth’s Magnetic Field: Spin Dynam- ics and Relaxation in Unconventional Regimes, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Polit` ecnica de Catalunya (2024), 2117/406472

2024
[32]

D. M. Doddrell, D. T. Pegg, and M. R. Bendall, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)48, 323 (1982)

1969
[33]

G. M. Hale and M. R. Querry, Applied Optics12, 555 (1973)

1973
[34]

D. I. Hoult and R. E. Richards, Journal of Magnetic Res- onance (1969)24, 71 (1976)

1969
[35]

Kovacs, D

H. Kovacs, D. Moskau, and M. Spraul, Progress in Nu- clear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy46, 131 (2005)

2005
[36]

H. J. Hogben, M. Krzystyniak, G. T. P. Charnock, P. J. Hore, and I. Kuprov, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 208, 179 (2011)

2011
[37]

T. A. Ruden, O. B. Lutnæs, T. Helgaker, and K. Ruud, Journal of Chemical Physics118, 9572 (2003)

2003
[38]

Adamo and V

C. Adamo and V. Barone, Journal of Chemical Physics 110, 6158 (1999)

1999
[39]

Shimizu, J

Y. Shimizu, J. Blanchard, S. Pustelny, G. Saielli, A. Bagno, M. Ledbetter, D. Budker, and A. Pines, Jour- nal of Magnetic Resonance250, 1 (2015)

2015
[40]

M. A. Z. Chowdhury, T. E. Rice, and M. A. Oehlschlaeger, Applied Physics B127, 34 (2021)

2021
[41]

McCarthy and K

M. McCarthy and K. L. K. Lee, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A124, 3002 (2020)

2020
[42]

Horai, M

H. Horai, M. Arita, S. Kanaya, Y. Nihei, T. Ikeda, K. Suwa, Y. Ojima, K. Tanaka, S. Tanaka, K. Aoshima, Y. Oda, Y. Kakazu, M. Kusano, T. Tohge, F. Mat- suda, Y. Sawada, M. Y. Hirai, H. Nakanishi, K. Ikeda, N. Akimoto, T. Maoka, H. Takahashi, T. Ara, N. Sakurai, H. Suzuki, D. Shibata, S. Neumann, T. Iida, K. Tanaka, K. Funatsu, F. Matsuura, T. Soga, R. Tag...

2010
[43]

Scheiner,Hydrogen bonding: a theoretical perspective, Vol

S. Scheiner,Hydrogen bonding: a theoretical perspective, Vol. 7 (Oxford University Press, 1997)

1997
[44]

Chelli, R

R. Chelli, R. Righini, and S. Califano, Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry B109, 17006 (2005)

2005
[45]

Giovannini, F

T. Giovannini, F. Egidi, and C. Cappelli, Chemical So- ciety Reviews49, 5664 (2020)

2020
[46]

H. M. Rahman, G. Hefter, and R. Buchner, Journal of Physical Chemistry B116, 314 (2012)

2012
[47]

Leung and S

K. Leung and S. B. Rempe, Journal of the American Chemical Society126, 344 (2004)

2004
[48]

W. W. Rudolph and G. Irmer, Journal of Solution Chem- istry51, 935 (2022)

2022
[49]

Trapp, S

K. Trapp, S. Kosasang, J. Ingenmey, D. Gomez Vazquez, M. Salanne, and M. Lukatskaya, ChemRxiv (2025), 11 https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-7j1vd-v2

work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-7j1vd-v2 2025
[50]

E. A. Meyer, R. K. Castellano, and F. Diederich, Ange- wandte Chemie International Edition42, 1210 (2003)

2003
[51]

P. Zhou, J. Huang, and F. Tian, Current medicinal chemistry19, 226 (2012)

2012
[52]

T. Hong, Y. Wang, Z. Shao, Q. Li, M. Jiang, and X. Peng, Magnetic Resonance Letters5, 200170 (2025)

2025
[53]

P.-H. Chen, C. Gao, N. Alaniva, S. Bj¨ orgvinsd´ ottir, I. G. Pagonakis, M. A. Urban, A. D¨ app, R. Gunzenhauser, and A. B. Barnes, Journal of Magnetic Resonance357, 107588 (2023)

2023
[54]

W. Lee, D. Park, J. Bascu˜ n´ an, and Y. Iwasa, Supercon- ductor Science and Technology35, 105007 (2022)

2022
[55]

Neese, WIREs Computational Molecular Science15, e70019 (2025)

F. Neese, WIREs Computational Molecular Science15, e70019 (2025)

2025
[56]

Helmich-Paris, B

B. Helmich-Paris, B. de Souza, F. Neese, and R. Izs´ ak, Journal of Chemical Physics155, 104109 (2021)

2021
[57]

G. L. Stoychev, A. A. Auer, and F. Neese, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation13, 554 (2017)

2017
[58]

de Souza, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, e202500393 (2025)

B. de Souza, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, e202500393 (2025)

2025
[59]

Bannwarth, S

C. Bannwarth, S. Ehlert, and S. Grimme, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation15, 1652 (2019)

2019
[60]

Grimme, J

S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, Journal of Chemical Physics132, 154104 (2010)

2010
[61]

T. H. Dunning Jr, Journal of Chemical Physics90, 1007 (1989)

1989
[62]

R. A. Kendall, T. H. Dunning Jr, and R. J. Harrison, Journal of Chemical Physics96, 6796 (1992)

1992
[63]

D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning Jr, Journal of Chemical Physics103, 4572 (1995)

1995
[64]

Jensen, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2, 1360 (2006)

F. Jensen, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2, 1360 (2006)

2006
[65]

P. R. Franke, J. F. Stanton, and G. E. Douberly, Journal of Physical Chemistry A125, 1301 (2021)

2021
[66]

Pavoˇ sevi´ c, F

F. Pavoˇ sevi´ c, F. Neese, and E. F. Valeev, Journal of chemical physics141, 054106 (2014)

2014
[67]

K. A. Peterson, T. B. Adler, and H.-J. Werner, Journal of Chemical Physics128, 084102 (2008)

2008
[68]

Cossi, N

M. Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani, and V. Barone, Journal of Computational Chemistry24, 669 (2003)

2003
[69]

Jensen, Journal of Physical Chemistry A111, 11198 (2007)

F. Jensen, Journal of Physical Chemistry A111, 11198 (2007)

2007
[70]

Jensen, Journal of Chemical Physics136, 114107 (2012)

F. Jensen, Journal of Chemical Physics136, 114107 (2012)

2012
[71]

P. R. Horn, Y. Mao, and M. Head-Gordon, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 23067 (2016)

2016
[72]

Epifanovsky, A

E. Epifanovsky, A. T. Gilbert, X. Feng, J. Lee, Y. Mao, N. Mardirossian, P. Pokhilko, A. F. White, M. P. Coons, A. L. Dempwolff,et al., Journal of Chemical Physics155, 084801 (2021)

2021
[73]

Chai and M

J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Journal of Chemical Physics128, 084106 (2008)

2008
[74]

Chai and M

J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics10, 6615 (2008)

2008
[75]

Lin, G.-D

Y.-S. Lin, G.-D. Li, S.-P. Mao, and J.-D. Chai, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation9, 263 (2013)

2013
[76]

Weigend and R

F. Weigend and R. Ahlrichs, Physical Chemistry Chem- ical Physics7, 3297 (2005)

2005
[77]

Rappoport and F

D. Rappoport and F. Furche, Journal of Chemical Physics133, 134105 (2010)

2010
[78]

Mao,Advances in Density Functional Theory Calcula- tions and Their Analysis(University of California, Berke- ley, 2017)

Y. Mao,Advances in Density Functional Theory Calcula- tions and Their Analysis(University of California, Berke- ley, 2017)

2017
[79]

E. F. Valeev, Chemical Physics Letters395, 190 (2004)

2004
[80]

Weigend, A

F. Weigend, A. K¨ ohn, and C. H¨ attig, Journal of Chem- ical Physics116, 3175 (2002)

2002

Showing first 80 references.