pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26108 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph

Recognition: unknown

Implementation of the hybrid exchange-correlation functionals in the SIESTA code

Yann Pouillon , Bill Clintone Oyomo , James Sifuna , Mar\'ia Camarasa-G\'omez , Xinming Qin , Carlos Beltr\'an , Fernando G\'omez-Ortiz , Honghui Shang
show 1 more author
Javier Junquera
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords hybrid functionalsSIESTAexact exchangenumerical atomic orbitalsLIBINTHSE06band gaps
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid functionals are now implemented in SIESTA for large systems by fitting numerical atomic orbitals to Gaussians for exact exchange.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes an implementation of hybrid exchange-correlation functionals inside the SIESTA code that combines Hartree-Fock exact exchange with the code's strictly localized numerical atomic orbitals. It achieves this by expanding the orbitals in a Gaussian basis so that four-center repulsion integrals can be evaluated analytically with the LIBINT library, then folds the result into SIESTA's existing real-space grid and sparse-matrix machinery together with screening. The authors also derive fully analytical forces and a dynamic parallel scheme. Benchmark tests on semiconductors, insulators and two-dimensional materials show that the HSE06 functional produces band gaps closer to G0W0 and experiment than the PBE functional, while the cost remains manageable for extended systems.

Core claim

By representing numerical atomic orbitals as linear combinations of Gaussian-type orbitals, four-center electron-repulsion integrals can be computed analytically with LIBINT, allowing hybrid functionals to be evaluated efficiently inside SIESTA's sparse real-space infrastructure with controlled screening and scalable parallelism.

What carries the argument

Gaussian fit of numerical atomic orbitals enabling analytical four-center ERIs via LIBINT.

If this is right

  • HSE06 calculations become practical for systems containing hundreds to thousands of atoms.
  • Structural relaxations and molecular-dynamics runs can use hybrid functionals with analytic forces.
  • Users can trade accuracy against cost by adjusting the number of Gaussians and the integral-screening thresholds.
  • Results for semiconductors and 2D materials lie close to G0W0 and experiment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fitting strategy could be reused to add other exact-exchange-based methods to NAO-based codes.
  • Parallel scaling data imply that even larger supercells or defect supercells are now within reach.
  • The reported trade-off curves can serve as a practical guide for choosing parameters on new materials.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian expansion reproduces the numerical orbitals accurately enough that the resulting exact-exchange contributions do not change band gaps or forces beyond acceptable numerical tolerances.

What would settle it

Direct comparison on a small periodic system where the hybrid band gap or force differs by more than a few percent from the same quantity computed with an all-electron code that uses exact numerical orbitals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26108 by Bill Clintone Oyomo, Carlos Beltr\'an, Fernando G\'omez-Ortiz, Honghui Shang, James Sifuna, Javier Junquera, Mar\'ia Camarasa-G\'omez, Xinming Qin, Yann Pouillon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an efficient and accurate implementation of hybrid exchange-correlation (XC) functionals in the SIESTA code, enabling large-scale simulations based on Hartree-Fock-type exact exchange combined with strictly localized numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs). Our approach exploits a fitted representation of the NAOs in terms of Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs), which allows for the analytical evaluation of four-center electron repulsion integrals (ERIs) via the LIBINT library. This framework is seamlessly integrated with SIESTA's real-space grid and sparse-matrix infrastructure, and is combined with multiple screening techniques to control the computational complexity. We also introduce a fully analytical formulation of hybrid-functional forces and a dynamic parallel distribution scheme that ensures excellent scalability. We validate our implementation through benchmark calculations on a broad set of systems (including semiconductors, insulators, and two-dimensional materials) and demonstrate that the HSE06 functional significantly improves the prediction of band gaps compared to PBE, in close agreement with G0W0 and experimental data. We analyze in detail the trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency as a function of the number of Gaussians, basis set range, and integral screening thresholds. Our results confirm that hybrid functional calculations in SIESTA are now feasible for large extended systems, making accurate first-principles predictions of electronic and structural properties accessible at scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper describes an implementation of hybrid XC functionals (e.g., HSE06) in the SIESTA code. NAOs are fitted to GTOs to enable analytic four-center ERIs via LIBINT; this is combined with SIESTA's real-space grid, sparse matrices, integral screening, a fully analytic force formulation, and dynamic parallel distribution. Benchmarks on semiconductors, insulators, and 2D materials are reported to show that HSE06 band gaps improve over PBE and agree with G0W0 and experiment; trade-offs with number of Gaussians, basis range, and screening thresholds are analyzed.

Significance. If the NAO-to-GTO fit and screening preserve the accuracy of the exact-exchange contribution, the work would make hybrid-functional calculations routinely feasible for large periodic systems in a widely used localized-basis code, addressing a practical need in materials modeling where semilocal functionals often fail for band gaps and defect levels.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Implementation of the NAO-GTO fit and ERI evaluation): the central accuracy claim rests on the fitted GTO representation reproducing the exact-exchange matrix elements of the original NAOs to sufficient precision, yet no explicit error metric (e.g., maximum deviation in exchange energy or matrix elements relative to an unfitted NAO reference) is supplied as a function of the number of Gaussians; without this, agreement with external G0W0/experimental data could mask compensating errors.
  2. [§4] §4 (Benchmark calculations): while HSE06 results are stated to agree with G0W0 and experiment, the manuscript provides no side-by-side comparison against an independent hybrid-functional implementation (plane-wave or other NAO code) on the same periodic cells; such a cross-code validation would be required to confirm that fit-induced and screening-induced errors remain below the reported band-gap improvements.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.3] The description of the dynamic parallel distribution scheme would benefit from a short pseudocode or timing table showing load balance across nodes for a representative large system.
  2. [Figures 4-6] Figure captions for the basis-range and screening-threshold convergence plots should explicitly state the system, functional, and property (band gap or total energy) being plotted.
  3. [§3.2] A brief statement on the memory scaling of the LIBINT ERI storage relative to the sparse-matrix infrastructure would clarify the practical limits for very large cells.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the major comments and will revise the manuscript accordingly to address the concerns regarding the accuracy of the NAO-GTO fit and the need for cross-validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Implementation of the NAO-GTO fit and ERI evaluation): the central accuracy claim rests on the fitted GTO representation reproducing the exact-exchange matrix elements of the original NAOs to sufficient precision, yet no explicit error metric (e.g., maximum deviation in exchange energy or matrix elements relative to an unfitted NAO reference) is supplied as a function of the number of Gaussians; without this, agreement with external G0W0/experimental data could mask compensating errors.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. While our manuscript analyzes the trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency as a function of the number of Gaussians (including effects on band gaps), we acknowledge that we did not provide a direct, explicit error metric for the reproduction of exact-exchange matrix elements or energies by the fitted GTOs compared to the original NAOs. To address this, in the revised manuscript we will include a dedicated analysis, such as a table or plot, showing the maximum deviation in the exchange energy and selected matrix elements as a function of the number of Gaussians for benchmark systems. This will demonstrate that the fitting errors are well-controlled and do not compromise the reported improvements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Benchmark calculations): while HSE06 results are stated to agree with G0W0 and experiment, the manuscript provides no side-by-side comparison against an independent hybrid-functional implementation (plane-wave or other NAO code) on the same periodic cells; such a cross-code validation would be required to confirm that fit-induced and screening-induced errors remain below the reported band-gap improvements.

    Authors: We agree that direct cross-code validation would provide stronger evidence that the implementation errors are negligible compared to the functional improvements. Although our results show good agreement with G0W0 and experimental band gaps, this does not explicitly rule out compensating errors from the fit or screening. In the revision, we will add comparisons with results from established hybrid-functional implementations (such as VASP or other codes) for a selection of the smaller periodic systems studied, using identical unit cells and k-point sampling where possible. This will help confirm the reliability of our approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: implementation validated against external references

full rationale

The paper presents a software implementation of hybrid XC functionals in SIESTA via NAO-to-GTO fitting for analytic ERIs with LIBINT, combined with screening and parallelization. Its central feasibility claim for large systems rests on benchmark results for band gaps and forces that are compared directly to independent G0W0 calculations and experimental values, not to any quantity derived from the paper's own fitted parameters or prior self-citations. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted input renamed as a prediction, nor does any uniqueness theorem or ansatz depend on self-referential citations. The Gaussian-fit accuracy is treated as an engineering assumption whose quality is assessed externally rather than enforced internally.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum-chemistry integral techniques and the assumption that a modest Gaussian expansion of each NAO is accurate enough for hybrid exchange. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • number of Gaussians per NAO
    Chosen to balance accuracy and cost; the value is a tunable parameter of the implementation.
  • integral screening thresholds
    Control which ERIs are neglected; directly affect both speed and accuracy.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A Gaussian expansion of the numerical atomic orbitals permits sufficiently accurate analytical evaluation of the four-center electron-repulsion integrals required for exact exchange.
    Invoked when the authors state that the fitted representation allows use of LIBINT without loss of essential accuracy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1508 out tokens · 51785 ms · 2026-05-07T15:45:50.847583+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    within the PBE flavor, and available in the Pseudo- Dojo periodic table [ 129, 130]. Although these pseu- dopotentials are not strictly consistent with the hy- brid exchange–correlation functional, previous system- atic studies have shown that the resulting errors in struc- tural and electronic properties are typically small (of the order of 1%) and well ...

  2. [2]

    A larger NG reduces the goal function that mea- sures the difference between the sum of Gaussians and the original radial part of the native NAOs [metric ˜G, defined in Eq

    Number of Gaussians The number of Gaussians used to expand the radial components of the NAOs significantly impacts the effi- ciency of hybrid functional simulations, as illustrated in Table-II. A larger NG reduces the goal function that mea- sures the difference between the sum of Gaussians and the original radial part of the native NAOs [metric ˜G, define...

    2004

  3. [3]

    Table- IV explores the effect of varying the cutoff radius rc used to truncate the orbitals, controlled via the ϵGauss parameter defined in Sec

    Range of the radial parts of the atomic orbitals The spatial extent of the NAOs plays a crucial role in determining the sparsity of the Hamiltonian matrix and, by extension, the computational efficiency of hybrid functional calculations. Table- IV explores the effect of varying the cutoff radius rc used to truncate the orbitals, controlled via the ϵGauss p...

    2046

  4. [4]

    Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics (CosmoVerse)

    Integral screening thresholds To assess the impact of integral screening on the accu- racy and efficiency of hybrid functional calculations, we perform a systematic benchmark by varying the screen- ing thresholds discussed in Sec. IV. In particular, we set the Schwarz pair-list threshold ϵpair−list and the density screening threshold ϵSchwartz [cf. Eqs. ( ...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 1970

  5. [5]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  6. [6]

    R. M. Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Kohanoff, Electronic Structure Calculations for Solids and Molecules: Theory and Computational Methods (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    J. Kohanoff, Electronic Structure Calculations for Solids and Molecules: Theory and Computational Methods (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density F unctional T heory of Atoms and M olecules (Oxford University Press, 1989)

    1989

  9. [9]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  10. [10]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)

    1980

  11. [11]

    J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)

    1981

  12. [12]

    J. P. Perdew and K. Burke, Comparison shopping for a gradient-corrected density functional, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 57, 309 (1996)

    1996

  13. [13]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  14. [14]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Erratum: Generalized gradient approximation made simple [phys. rev. lett. 77, 3865 (1996)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

    1996

  15. [15]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Zhang, A

    G.-X. Zhang, A. M. Reilly, A. Tkatchenko, and M. Scheffler, Performance of various density-functional approximations for cohesive properties of 64 bulk solids, New J. Phys. 20, 063020 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    J. P. Perdew and K. Schmidt, Jacob’s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy, AIP Conf. Proc. 577, 1 (2001)

    2001

  18. [18]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sánchez, and W. Yang, Insights into current limitations of density functional theory, Sci- ence 321, 792 (2008)

    2008

  19. [19]

    J. P. Perdew and M. Levy, Physical content of the exact Kohn-Sham orbital energies: Band gaps and derivative discontinuities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1884 (1983)

    1983

  20. [20]

    L. J. Sham and M. Schlüter, Density-functional theory of the energy gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)

    1983

  21. [21]

    Mori-Sánchez, A

    P. Mori-Sánchez, A. J. Cohen, and W. Yang, Local- ization and delocalization errors in density functional theory and implications for band-gap prediction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 146401 (2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    Anisimov, Strong Coulomb Correlations in Electronic Structure Calculations , Advances in Condensed Matter 23 Science (Taylor & Francis, 2000)

    V. Anisimov, Strong Coulomb Correlations in Electronic Structure Calculations , Advances in Condensed Matter 23 Science (Taylor & Francis, 2000)

    2000

  23. [23]

    A. D. Becke, A new mixing of Hartree-Fock and lo- cal density‐functional theories, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372 (1993)

    1993

  24. [24]

    P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski, and M. J. Frisch, Ab initio calculation of vibrational ab- sorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11623 (1994)

    1994

  25. [25]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone, Toward reliable density func- tional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158 (1999)

    1999

  26. [26]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  27. [27]

    Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb po- tential

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb po- tential” [ J C hem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)], J. Chem. Phys. 124, 219906 (2006)

    2003

  28. [28]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    Schimka, J

    L. Schimka, J. Harl, and G. Kresse, Improved hybrid functional for solids: The HSEsol functional, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 024116 (2011)

    2011

  30. [30]

    B. G. Janesko, T. M. Henderson, and G. E. Scuse- ria, Screened hybrid density functionals for solid-state chemistry and physics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 443 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    A. J. Garza and G. E. Scuseria, Predicting band gaps with hybrid density functionals, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4165 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    Borlido, T

    P. Borlido, T. Aull, A. W. Huran, F. Tran, M. A. L. Marques, and S. Botti, Large-scale benchmark of exchange–correlation functionals for the determination of electronic band gaps of solids, J. Chem. Theory Com- put. 15, 5069 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    J. Yang, S. Falletta, and A. Pasquarello, Range- separated hybrid functionals for accurate prediction of band gaps of extended systems, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 108 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Paier, M

    J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. Ángyán, Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids

    J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. Ángyán, Erratum: “screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids” [j. chem. phys. 124, 154709 (2006)], The Journal of Chemical Physics 125, 249901 (2006)

    2006

  36. [36]

    Lany and A

    S. Lany and A. Zunger, Polaronic hole localization and multiple hole binding of acceptors in oxide wide-gap semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 80, 085202 (2009)

    2009

  37. [37]

    Chen and A

    W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, Correspondence of de- fect energy levels in hybrid density functional theory and many-body perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. B 88, 115104 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    Chen and A

    W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, Accuracy of GW for cal- culating defect energy levels in solids, Phys. Rev. B 96, 020101 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    H. Guo, X. Zhang, and G. Lu, Moiré excitons in defec- tive van der Waals heterostructures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2105468118 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    W. Chen, S. M. Griffin, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hau- tier, Nonunique fraction of Fock exchange for defects in two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B 106, L161107 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    S. Ke, S. E. Gant, L. Kronik, and J. B. Neaton, Accurate point defect energy levels from non-empirical screened range-separated hybrid functionals: The case of native vacancies in ZnO, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053806 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Sagredo, M

    F. Sagredo, M. Camarasa-Gómez, F. Ricci, A. Cham- pagne, L. Kronik, and J. B. Neaton, The reliability of hybrid functionals for accurate fundamental and opti- cal gap prediction of bulk solids and surfaces, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 5009 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Gonze, F

    X. Gonze, F. Jollet, F. Abreu Araujo, D. Adams, B. Amadon, T. Applencourt, C. Audouze, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, A. Bokhanchuk, E. Bousquet, F. Bruneval, D. Caliste, M. Côté, F. Dahm, F. Da Pieve, M. Delaveau, M. Di Gennaro, B. Dorado, C. Es- pejo, G. Geneste, L. Genovese, A. Gerossier, M. Gi- antomassi, Y. Gillet, D. Hamann, L. He, G. Jomard, J. Laflamme ...

    2016

  44. [44]

    Lin, Adaptively compressed exchange operator, J

    L. Lin, Adaptively compressed exchange operator, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 2242 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Duchemin and F

    I. Duchemin and F. Gygi, A scalable and accurate al- gorithm for the computation of Hartree–Fock exchange, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 855 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    R. A. DiStasio, B. Santra, Z. Li, X. Wu, and R. Car, The individual and collective effects of exact exchange and dispersion interactions on the ab initio structure of liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 084502 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    T. A. Barnes, T. Kurth, P. Carrier, N. Wichmann, D. Prendergast, P. R. Kent, and J. Deslippe, Improved treatment of exact exchange in Quantum espresso, Comput. Phys. Commun. 214, 52 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    X. Wu, A. Selloni, and R. Car, Order- N implementation of exact exchange in extended insulating systems, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085102 (2009)

    2009

  49. [49]

    Natan, Fock-exchange for periodic structures in the real-space formalism and the KLI approximation, Phys

    A. Natan, Fock-exchange for periodic structures in the real-space formalism and the KLI approximation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 31510 (2015)

    2015

  50. [50]

    N. M. Boffi, M. Jain, and A. Natan, Efficient Computa- tion of the Hartree–Fock Exchange in Real-Space with Projection Operators, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 3614 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scal- mani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnen- berg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Ki- tao, H. N...

    2009

  52. [52]

    Valiev, E

    M. Valiev, E. Bylaska, N. Govind, K. Kowalski, T. Straatsma, H. V. Dam, D. Wang, J. Nieplocha, E. Apra, T. Windus, and W. de Jong, NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 181, 1477 (2010)

    2010

  53. [53]

    VandeVondele, M

    J. VandeVondele, M. Krack, F. Mohamed, M. Par- rinello, T. Chassaing, and J. Hutter, Quickstep: Fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed gaussian and plane waves approach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 103 (2005)

    2005

  54. [54]

    I. J. Bush, S. Tomic, B. G. Searle, G. Mallia, C. L. Bailey, B. Montanari, L. Bernasconi, J. M. Carr, and N. M. Harrison, Parallel implementation of the ab initio crystal program: electronic structure calculations for periodic systems, Proc. R. Soc. A 467, 2112 (2011)

    2011

  55. [55]

    G. t. Te Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. Fonseca Guerra, S. J. van Gisbergen, J. G. Sni- jders, and T. Ziegler, Chemistry with ADF, J. Comput. Chem. 22, 931 (2001)

    2001

  56. [56]

    V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molec- ular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2175 (2009)

    2009

  57. [57]

    V. Havu, V. Blum, P. Havu, and M. Scheffler, Efficient integration for all-electron electronic structure calcula- tion using numeric basis functions, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 8367 (2009)

    2009

  58. [58]

    X. Ren, P. Rinke, V. Blum, J. Wieferink, A. Tkatchenko, A. Sanfilippo, K. Reuter, and M. Schef- fler, Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hybrid density functionals, RPA, MP2 and GW with numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions, New J. Phys. 14, 053020 (2012)

    2012

  59. [59]

    X. Qin, H. Shang, L. Xu, W. Hu, J. Yang, S. Li, and Y. Zhang, The static parallel distribution algorithms for hybrid density-functional calculations in honpas package, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 34, 159 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    Guidon, J

    M. Guidon, J. Hutter, and J. VandeVondele, Auxiliary density matrix methods for Hartree-Fock exchange cal- culations, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 2348 (2010)

    2010

  61. [61]

    Schwegler and M

    E. Schwegler and M. Challacombe, Linear scaling com- putation of the Hartree–Fock exchange matrix, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2726 (1996)

    1996

  62. [62]

    J. C. Burant, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, A linear scaling method for Hartree–Fock exchange calculations of large molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 8969 (1996)

    1996

  63. [63]

    Schwegler, M

    E. Schwegler, M. Challacombe, and M. Head-Gordon, Linear scaling computation of the Fock matrix. II. rigor- ous bounds on exchange integrals and incremental Fock build, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9708 (1997)

    1997

  64. [64]

    Ochsenfeld, C

    C. Ochsenfeld, C. A. White, and M. Head-Gordon, Lin- ear and sublinear scaling formation of Hartree–Fock- type exchange matrices, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1663 (1998)

    1998

  65. [65]

    Polly, H.-J

    R. Polly, H.-J. Werner, F. R. Manby, and P. J. Knowles, Fast Hartree–Fock theory using local density fitting ap- proximations, Mol. Phys. 102, 2311 (2004)

    2004

  66. [66]

    Sodt and M

    A. Sodt and M. Head-Gordon, Hartree-Fock exchange computed using the atomic resolution of the identity approximation, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 104106 (2008)

    2008

  67. [67]

    Merlot, R

    P. Merlot, R. Izsák, A. Borgoo, T. Kjærgaard, T. Hel- gaker, and S. Reine, Charge-constrained auxiliary- density-matrix methods for the Hartree-Fock exchange contribution, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 094104 (2014)

    2014

  68. [68]

    X. Liu, A. Patel, and E. Chow, A new scalable parallel algorithm for Fock matrix construction, in 2014 IEEE 28th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IEEE, 2014)

    2014

  69. [69]

    E. Chow, X. Liu, M. Smelyanskiy, and J. R. Ham- mond, Parallel scalability of Hartree–Fock calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 104103 (2015)

    2015

  70. [70]

    See: http://gaussian.com

  71. [71]

    Hutter, M

    J. Hutter, M. Iannuzzi, F. Schiffmann, and J. Vande- Vondele, cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed mat- ter systems, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 15 (2014)

    2014

  72. [72]

    Guidon, F

    M. Guidon, F. Schiffmann, J. Hutter, and J. VandeVon- dele, Ab initio molecular dynamics using hybrid density functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 214104 (2008)

    2008

  73. [73]

    T. D. Kühne, M. Iannuzzi, M. Del Ben, V. V. Ry- bkin, P. Seewald, F. Stein, T. Laino, R. Z. Khaliullin, O. Schütt, F. Schiffmann, et al. , cp2k: An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package- quickstep: Efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 194103 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    Iannuzzi, J

    M. Iannuzzi, J. Wilhelm, F. Stein, A. Bussy, H. El- gabarty, D. Golze, A. Hehn, M. Graml, S. Marek, B. S. Gökmen, C. Schran, H. Forbert, R. Z. Khaliullin, A. Kozhevnikov, M. Taillefumier, R. Meli, V. Rybkin, M. Brehm, R. Schade, O. Schütt, J. V. Pototschnig, H. Mirhosseini, A. Knüpfer, D. Marx, M. Krack, J. Hut- ter, and T. D. Kühne, The cp2k program pack...

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    See: https://www.cp2k.org

  76. [76]

    I. J. Bush, S. Tomić, B. G. Searle, G. Mallia, C. L. Bailey, B. Montanari, L. Bernasconi, J. M. Carr, and N. M. Harrison, Parallel implementation of the ab initio crystal program: Electronic structure calculations for periodic systems, Proc. R. Soc. A 467, 2112 (2011)

    2011

  77. [77]

    Dovesi, F

    R. Dovesi, F. Pascale, B. Civalleri, K. Doll, N. M. Har- rison, I. Bush, P. D’Arco, Y. Noël, M. Rérat, P. Car- bonnière, M. Causà, S. Salustro, V. Lacivita, B. Kirt- man, A. M. Ferrari, F. S. Gentile, J. Baima, M. Ferrero, R. Demichelis, and M. De La Pierre, The crystal code, 1976–2020 and beyond, a long story, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 204111 (2020)

    1976

  78. [78]

    A. Erba, J. K. Desmarais, S. Casassa, B. Civalleri, L. Donà, I. J. Bush, B. Searle, L. Maschio, L. Edith- Daga, A. Cossard, et al. , crystal23: A program for computational solid state physics and chemistry, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 6891 (2022)

    2022

  79. [79]

    See: https://www.crystal.unito.it/index.php

  80. [80]

    J. M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. García, J. Jun- quera, P. Ordejón, and D. Sánchez-Portal, The siesta method for ab initio order-N materials simulation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2745 (2002)

    2002

Showing first 80 references.