Recognition: unknown
Scattering of electromagnetic field in quasi-topological gravity
Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:46 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity shift electromagnetic absorption spectra away from the singular Tangherlini case.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central discovery is that regularity effects lead to systematic deviations from the singular Tangherlini solution, manifested in shifts of the absorption spectrum and modifications of the effective photon sphere radius. Increasing the number of spacetime dimensions suppresses these deviations, driving the system toward the classical limit and reducing the number of multipoles required for convergence. In the high-frequency regime the absorption cross section approaches the geometric-optics limit, while at low frequencies it is strongly suppressed due to diminished transmission probabilities.
What carries the argument
The WKB-based computation of transmission probabilities for electromagnetic perturbations on the regular black hole background.
If this is right
- Deviations from the singular solution decrease as spacetime dimensionality rises.
- Absorption cross sections match the geometric-optics limit at high frequencies.
- Low-frequency absorption remains strongly suppressed by low transmission probabilities.
- The number of multipoles needed for accurate results drops in higher dimensions.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same transmission calculation could be repeated for other field types to check whether the regularity signatures are universal.
- Precision measurements of black-hole shadows or ringdown signals might eventually constrain the strength of the higher-curvature corrections.
- If the four-dimensional brane picture holds, similar absorption shifts could appear in effective lower-dimensional descriptions of higher-dimensional gravity.
Load-bearing premise
The approximate method used to calculate transmission probabilities remains accurate for electromagnetic waves across the relevant frequencies on these regular backgrounds.
What would settle it
A full numerical integration of the electromagnetic wave equation on the same background that finds absorption cross sections identical to the Tangherlini solution would falsify the reported systematic shifts.
read the original abstract
We investigate the absorption cross sections of electromagnetic perturbations propagating on a four-dimensional brane in the background of higher-dimensional regular black holes arising in quasi-topological gravity. Employing a WKB-based approach for the computation of greybody factors, we analyze the impact of higher-curvature corrections and spacetime dimensionality on the scattering properties of the system. We show that regularity effects lead to systematic deviations from the singular Tangherlini solution, manifested in shifts of the absorption spectrum and modifications of the effective photon sphere radius. Increasing the number of spacetime dimensions suppresses these deviations, driving the system toward the classical limit and reducing the number of multipoles required for convergence. In the high-frequency regime, the absorption cross section approaches the geometric-optics limit, while at low frequencies it is strongly suppressed due to diminished transmission probabilities. Our results demonstrate that the interplay between regularity and higher-curvature effects leaves distinct imprints on the absorption characteristics, providing a sensitive probe of the underlying gravitational theory.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies absorption cross-sections of electromagnetic perturbations on a 4D brane in higher-dimensional regular black-hole backgrounds sourced by quasi-topological gravity. Using a WKB approximation to evaluate greybody factors, it reports that regularity produces systematic shifts in the absorption spectrum and effective photon-sphere radius relative to the singular Tangherlini solution, with these deviations suppressed as the spacetime dimension increases; low-frequency absorption is suppressed while the high-frequency limit recovers the geometric-optics value.
Significance. If the WKB-derived deviations are robust, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable signature of regularity and higher-curvature corrections in wave scattering, which could be tested in analog gravity systems or high-energy astrophysical observations. The dimensional trend toward the classical limit is a useful consistency check, but the overall significance is limited by the absence of any validation of the approximation method itself.
major comments (2)
- [§4] §4 (WKB computation of greybody factors): the paper applies the WKB formula to the effective potential for electromagnetic perturbations but supplies neither error estimates, convergence checks with increasing WKB order, nor direct numerical integration of the radial wave equation for comparison. Because the claimed regularity-induced shifts are described as systematic yet potentially small, it is impossible to determine whether they exceed the uncontrolled truncation error of the asymptotic approximation.
- [§3.2] §3.2 (effective potential and photon-sphere radius): the modification of the photon-sphere radius is extracted from the peak of the potential barrier on the regular metric, yet no quantitative table or plot compares the exact location and height of this peak between the quasi-topological and Tangherlini cases across the frequency range used for the absorption cross-section. Without this, the assertion that regularity produces distinguishable shifts remains unquantified.
minor comments (2)
- [Figure 3] Figure 3 (absorption cross-section vs. frequency): the curves for different dimensions are difficult to distinguish at high frequencies; adding a zoomed inset or tabulated values at selected frequencies would improve readability.
- [§2] The notation for the regularity parameter (denoted variously as α or β in the text) should be unified and defined once in §2 before its appearance in the effective potential.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that additional validation of the WKB results and quantitative comparisons of the effective potentials would strengthen the presentation, and we will incorporate these elements in the revised version.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§4] §4 (WKB computation of greybody factors): the paper applies the WKB formula to the effective potential for electromagnetic perturbations but supplies neither error estimates, convergence checks with increasing WKB order, nor direct numerical integration of the radial wave equation for comparison. Because the claimed regularity-induced shifts are described as systematic yet potentially small, it is impossible to determine whether they exceed the uncontrolled truncation error of the asymptotic approximation.
Authors: We acknowledge the absence of explicit error estimates and numerical cross-checks in the current manuscript. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the expected truncation error of the WKB formula for the greybody factors, together with direct numerical integration of the radial wave equation for a representative set of multipoles, frequencies, and spacetime dimensions. These comparisons will be used to verify that the reported regularity-induced shifts lie outside the estimated numerical and approximation uncertainties. Where computationally feasible we will also report results from the next-to-leading WKB order to demonstrate convergence. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (effective potential and photon-sphere radius): the modification of the photon-sphere radius is extracted from the peak of the potential barrier on the regular metric, yet no quantitative table or plot compares the exact location and height of this peak between the quasi-topological and Tangherlini cases across the frequency range used for the absorption cross-section. Without this, the assertion that regularity produces distinguishable shifts remains unquantified.
Authors: We agree that a side-by-side quantitative comparison is needed to make the magnitude of the shifts explicit. The revised manuscript will include a new table (and, if space permits, an accompanying figure) that lists the radial location of the potential maximum and the value of the effective potential at that peak for both the quasi-topological regular solution and the Tangherlini background, for the same range of multipoles and frequencies employed in the absorption-cross-section calculations. This will directly quantify the differences induced by regularity. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity detected in derivation from background metric to scattering observables
full rationale
The paper solves the background metric from the quasi-topological gravity field equations (or adopts it from the theory's regular black-hole solutions), derives the effective potential for electromagnetic perturbations on that fixed geometry, and then applies the WKB approximation to obtain greybody factors and absorption cross sections. These steps form a one-way computational chain: the metric and potential are inputs independent of the WKB output, and the reported deviations from the Tangherlini solution are direct numerical consequences of the modified potential rather than redefinitions or fits. No self-citation is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that would force the result, and no parameter fitted to data is later presented as a prediction. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmark of the WKB method applied to the given metric.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Quasi-topological gravity provides a consistent higher-curvature extension of general relativity that admits regular black-hole solutions.
- domain assumption The WKB method yields reliable greybody factors for electromagnetic perturbations on the four-dimensional brane.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun
S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199
1975
-
[2]
Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class
H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) R159
1999
-
[3]
Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes
K.D. Kokkotas and B.G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2(1999) 2 [gr-qc/9909058]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
-
[4]
Bolokhov and M
S.V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Review of Analytic Results on Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes, Grav. Cosmol.31(2025) 423
2025
-
[5]
Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83 (2011) 793 [1102.4014]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
-
[6]
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A.O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001 [0905.2975]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2009
-
[7]
Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole, Phys
D.N. Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole, Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 198
1976
-
[8]
Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole
D.N. Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. 2. Massless Particles from a Rotating Hole, Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 3260
1976
-
[9]
P. Kanti and J. March-Russell, Calculable corrections to brane black hole decay. 1. The scalar case, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 024023 [hep-ph/0203223]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
-
[14]
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Dymnikova black hole from an infinite tower of higher-curvature corrections, Phys. Lett. B856 (2024) 138945 [2404.09063]
- [15]
-
[16]
All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities
J. Borissova, All 2Dgeneralised dilaton theories fromd≥4 gravities,2603.06786
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[17]
J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions, 2602.16773
-
[18]
J. Borissova and J. Magueijo, Modified Friedmann equations and non-singular cosmologies ind= 4 non-polynomial quasi-topological gravities, 2603.17654
-
[19]
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Infinite tower of higher-curvature corrections: Quasinormal modes and late-time behavior of D-dimensional regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 104005 [2403.07848]
-
[20]
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Convergence of Higher-Curvature Expansions Near the Horizon: Hawking Radiation from Regular Black Holes, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics1(2025) 5 [2507.22660]
-
[21]
J.P. Arbelaez, Quasinormal spectra of higher dimensional regular black holes in theories with infinite curvature corrections, 2509.25141
-
[22]
Grey-body factors of higher dimen- sional regular black holes in quasi-topological theories,
J.P. Arbelaez, Grey-body factors of higher dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological theories, 2601.22340
-
[23]
A. Dubinsky, Scattering of a scalar field in the four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.2(2026) 6 [2603.17644]
-
[24]
P. Kanti, Black holes in theories with large extra dimensions: A Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19(2004) 4899 [hep-ph/0402168]
-
[25]
Eiroa, A Braneworld black hole gravitational lens: Strong field limit analysis, Phys
E.F. Eiroa, A Braneworld black hole gravitational lens: Strong field limit analysis, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 083010 [gr-qc/0410128]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
-
[26]
Bulk and Brane Decay of a (4+n)-Dimensional Schwarzschild-De-Sitter Black Hole: Scalar Radiation
P. Kanti, J. Grain and A. Barrau, Bulk and brane decay of a (4+n)-dimensional Schwarzschild-de-Sitter black hole: Scalar radiation, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 104002 [hep-th/0501148]
work page Pith review arXiv 2005
-
[27]
C.M. Harris and P. Kanti, Hawking radiation from a (4+n)-dimensional rotating black hole, Phys. Lett. B633(2006) 106 [hep-th/0503010]
- [28]
-
[29]
Quasi-Normal Modes of Brane-Localised Standard Model Fields II: Kerr Black Holes
P. Kanti, R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasi-Normal Modes of Brane-Localised Standard Model Fields. II. Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064008 [gr-qc/0607048]
work page Pith review arXiv 2006
- [30]
-
[31]
L.C.B. Crispino, A. Higuchi and G.E.A. Matsas, Quantization of the electromagnetic field outside static black holes and its application to low-energy phenomena, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 124008 [gr-qc/0011070]. – 12 –
-
[32]
Iyer and C.M
S. Iyer and C.M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering, Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 3621
1987
-
[33]
Quasinormal behavior of the D-dimensional Schwarzshild black hole and higher order WKB approach
R.A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 024018 [gr-qc/0303052]
work page Pith review arXiv 2003
-
[34]
Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach
J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 024011 [1704.00361]
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[35]
J. Matyjasek and M. Telecka, Quasinormal modes of black holes. II. Pad´ e summation of the higher-order WKB terms, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 124006 [1908.09389]
-
[36]
Y. Hatsuda, Quasinormal modes of black holes and Borel summation, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 024008 [1906.07232]
-
[37]
Z. Malik, Gravitational Perturbations of the Hayward Spacetime and Testing the Correspondence between Quasinormal Modes and Grey-body Factors, Int. J. Theor. Phys.64(2025) 314 [2508.19178]
-
[38]
R.A. Konoplya, Quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of regular black holes with a scalar hair from the Effective Field Theory, JCAP07(2023) 001 [2305.09187]
-
[39]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Black Holes in Proca-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with Primary Hair: Particle Motion, Shadows, and Grey-Body Factors, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys1(2025) 4 [2507.09246]
-
[40]
S.V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of spherically symmetric traversable wormholes, JCAP04(2025) 025 [2412.11166]
-
[41]
A. Dubinsky and A.F. Zinhailo, Analytic expressions for grey-body factors of the general parametrized spherically symmetric black holes, EPL149(2025) 69004 [2410.15232]
-
[42]
R.A. Konoplya and A.F. Zinhailo, Hawking radiation of non-Schwarzschild black holes in higher derivative gravity: a crucial role of grey-body factors, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 104060 [1904.05341]
-
[43]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, E.U. Saka, A. Shermatov, J. Rayimbaev, I. Ibragimov and S. Muminov, Proper-time approach in asymptotic safety via black hole quasinormal modes and grey-body factors, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1190 [2509.15923]
-
[44]
A. Dubinsky, Gravitational perturbations of Dymnikova black holes: Grey-body factors and absorption cross-sections, Annals Phys.485(2026) 170299 [2509.11017]
-
[45]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Grey-Body Factors and Absorption Cross-Sections of Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Vicinity of Dilaton-De Sitter Black Hole, Fortsch. Phys.74(2026) e70074 [2510.10579]
-
[46]
M. Skvortsova, Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 854 [2411.06007]
-
[47]
R.A. Konoplya, Black holes in galactic centers: Quasinormal ringing, grey-body factors and Unruh temperature, Phys. Lett. B823(2021) 136734 [2109.01640]. – 13 –
-
[48]
Z. Malik, Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Electrodynamics, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.1(2025) 6 [2509.15995]
-
[49]
A. Dubinsky, Gray-body factors for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations around Gibbons–Maeda–Garfinkle–Horowitz–Strominger black holes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(2025) 2550111 [2412.00625]
-
[50]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Long-lived quasinormal modes and gray-body factors of black holes and wormholes in dark matter inspired Weyl gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 486 [2503.16087]
-
[51]
S.V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Gravitational Quasinormal Modes and Grey-Body Factors of Bonanno-Reuter Regular Black Holes, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.1(2025) 3 [2507.07196]
-
[52]
Long life of Gauss-Bonnet corrected black holes
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Long life of Gauss-Bonnet corrected black holes, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 084003 [1004.3772]
work page Pith review arXiv 2010
-
[53]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Long-lived quasinormal modes, grey-body factors and absorption cross-section of the black hole immersed in the Hernquist galactic halo, Phys. Lett. B872(2026) 140082 [2510.25969]
-
[54]
Malik, JCAP 04, 042 (2025), arXiv:2412.19443 [gr-qc]
Z. Malik, Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors for massive fields in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime, JCAP04(2025) 042 [2412.19443]
-
[55]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Quasinormal modes and gray-body factors for gravitational perturbations in asymptotically safe gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 39 [2505.06966]
-
[56]
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors in the eikonal limit and beyond, Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 245005 [2309.02560]
-
[57]
B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Non-minimal Einstein–Yang–Mills black holes: fundamental quasinormal mode and grey-body factors versus outburst of overtones, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 630 [2504.18482]
-
[58]
Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes,
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes, JCAP09(2024) 068 [2406.11694]
-
[59]
R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal frequencies for rotating black holes, Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139288 [2408.11162]
-
[60]
R.A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko and A.F. Zinhailo, Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 155002 [1904.10333]
work page Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[61]
R.A. Konoplya, J. Matyjasek and A. Zhidenko, An efficient higher-order WKB code for quasinormal modes and greybody factors, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.2(2026) 5 [2603.12466]
-
[62]
L.C.B. Crispino, A. Higuchi and G.E.A. Matsas, Low-frequency absorption cross section of the electromagnetic waves for the extreme Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 124038 [1004.4018]. – 14 –
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.