arxiv: 2604.26392 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Imaginarity-generating power of unitaries: A resource-theoretic approach

Akhil Kumar Awasthi , Mrinmoy Samanta , Sudipta Mondal , Ayan Patra , Aditi Sen De

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

keywords imaginarityresource theoryunitary dynamicsdynamical resourcesHilbert-Schmidt normHaar-random unitariesmonotonicityquantum states

0 comments

The pith

Unitary operations generate imaginarity from real states, with exact power formulas depending only on the unitary for pure inputs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper defines the imaginarity-generating power of a unitary as the maximum amount of imaginarity it can create in an initially real quantum state under a fixed purity constraint. The authors derive a closed-form expression for this quantity in any dimension and prove that for pure real input states the expression simplifies to depend only on intrinsic, experimentally accessible features of the unitary itself. They show that the chosen Hilbert-Schmidt measure of imaginarity is monotone under real unital operations, allowing the generating power to serve as a valid resource monotone in dynamical resource theory. They also characterize the unitaries that achieve the highest values and prove that Haar-random unitaries concentrate near this maximum in high dimensions with small fluctuations.

Core claim

The authors introduce the imaginarity-generating power (IGP) of unitary dynamics, quantified as the maximum Hilbert-Schmidt imaginarity inducible from real input states of fixed purity. They obtain an exact expression for the purity-constrained IGP that, for pure real inputs, reduces to quantities determined solely by the unitary. The IGP is shown to obey the monotonicity and other axioms required of a resource monotone in the dynamical resource theory of imaginarity. For Haar-random unitaries the IGP concentrates near its upper bound in large dimensions.

What carries the argument

The imaginarity-generating power (IGP) of a unitary, defined as the maximum Hilbert-Schmidt imaginarity it can produce from real states of given purity.

If this is right

Closed-form expressions allow direct computation of IGP without numerical optimization.
IGP qualifies as a resource monotone for the dynamical theory of imaginarity.
Unitaries that maximize IGP are fully characterized, supplying explicit upper bounds.
Haar-random unitaries achieve IGP values that concentrate near the maximum in high dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The dependence on only intrinsic unitary properties for pure inputs may simplify laboratory verification of imaginarity generation.
The concentration result implies that generic high-dimensional dynamics will reliably produce high imaginarity without fine-tuning.
The framework could be extended to quantify how well typical quantum channels generate imaginarity beyond the unitary case.

Load-bearing premise

The Hilbert-Schmidt norm measure of imaginarity is monotone under real unital operations.

What would settle it

An explicit unitary together with a pure real input state for which the measured Hilbert-Schmidt imaginarity after the evolution differs from the value predicted by the closed-form expression, or a real unital operation that increases the measure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26392 by Aditi Sen De, Akhil Kumar Awasthi, Ayan Patra, Mrinmoy Samanta, Sudipta Mondal.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Imaginarity, stemming from the complex structure of quantum mechanics, has recently emerged as a fundamental resource, yet its dynamical generation remains largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce the notion of imaginarity-generating power (IGP) of unitary dynamics, which quantifies the ability of unitary operations to produce imaginarity from initially real quantum states. To quantify imaginarity, we employ a measure based on the Hilbert--Schmidt norm, which we show to be monotone under real unital operations. Within the framework of dynamical resource theories, we derive an exact expression for the purity-constrained IGP in arbitrary dimensions and show that, for pure real input states, it depends solely on intrinsic and experimentally accessible properties of the unitary. We further analyze its average behavior over ensembles of states with varying purity under both uniform and Hilbert--Schmidt distributions. We prove that it satisfies the essential properties of a valid resource monotone within the dynamical resource theory of imaginarity. We also characterize the unitaries that maximize the IGP and determine the corresponding bounds. Moreover, for Haar-random unitaries, we show that the IGP concentrates near its maximal value in high dimensions with small fluctuations, indicating that typical high-dimensional quantum dynamics are highly effective at generating imaginarity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines imaginarity-generating power of unitaries, derives an exact purity-constrained expression, and shows concentration for Haar-random cases in high dimensions.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work introduces the imaginarity-generating power (IGP) of unitaries and works out a closed-form expression for it under a purity constraint on the input state. For pure real inputs the quantity reduces to properties of the unitary alone, which they note are experimentally accessible. They also prove the Hilbert-Schmidt norm measure of imaginarity is monotone under real unital maps, establish that IGP satisfies the required resource-monotone properties, characterize the maximizing unitaries, and show that Haar-random unitaries concentrate near the maximum IGP value with small fluctuations in high dimensions. The average behavior over uniform and Hilbert-Schmidt state ensembles is analyzed as well. These pieces fit together without obvious circularity or internal contradictions. The derivations appear to rest on direct properties of unitaries and standard concentration tools, and the monotonicity step is handled independently. The concentration claim is the sort of result that makes the concept practically relevant for typical high-dimensional dynamics. The main limitation is that everything is tied to the Hilbert-Schmidt norm choice for imaginarity; other measures might behave differently, though the paper does not claim universality. The experimental-accessibility statement for pure inputs is plausible but lacks a worked example of how one would extract the relevant unitary properties in the lab. No load-bearing gaps show up in the logical chain. This is for people already working in quantum resource theories who care about imaginarity or dynamical resources. A reader looking for concrete formulas and typicality results on unitary generation of complex structure will find usable content. It deserves a serious referee because the new notion is developed with explicit expressions and supporting proofs rather than hand-waving. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the imaginarity-generating power (IGP) of unitary dynamics within the dynamical resource theory of imaginarity. It employs a Hilbert-Schmidt norm-based measure of imaginarity, which is shown to be monotone under real unital operations. An exact expression for the purity-constrained IGP is derived in arbitrary dimensions, reducing for pure real input states to intrinsic and experimentally accessible properties of the unitary. The average behavior is analyzed over state ensembles of varying purity under uniform and Hilbert-Schmidt distributions. The IGP is proven to satisfy the properties of a valid resource monotone, the maximizing unitaries and corresponding bounds are characterized, and concentration of the IGP near its maximum (with small fluctuations) is established for Haar-random unitaries in high dimensions.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant for providing a rigorous resource-theoretic framework to quantify the dynamical generation of imaginarity from real states. The exact expressions, monotonicity proofs, and high-dimensional concentration results are notable strengths that offer concrete, falsifiable characterizations and could guide experimental protocols. The reduction to unitary-intrinsic properties for pure inputs and the analysis under different distributions add practical value to the dynamical resource theory of imaginarity.

minor comments (2)

The abstract is information-dense; splitting some sentences would improve readability without altering content.
Notation for the purity-constrained IGP and related quantities should be introduced with explicit definitions in the main text to avoid any ambiguity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment, which highlights the significance of the imaginarity-generating power framework, the exact expressions derived, the monotonicity proofs, and the high-dimensional concentration results. We are pleased that the referee recommends acceptance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces IGP as the maximum imaginarity (via HS-norm distance to real states) generatable by a unitary from real inputs, subject to purity constraint. The exact expression for pure real inputs is obtained by direct computation of the HS distance after unitary action, reducing only to the unitary's matrix elements in the real basis (experimentally accessible via real/imaginary parts). Monotonicity of the HS imaginarity measure under real unital maps is established by explicit inequality proof using the definition of the norm and properties of real operations, without invoking prior results as load-bearing. Average behavior over state ensembles follows from integration over uniform/HS measures on the state space. Concentration for Haar unitaries uses standard Levy concentration on the unitary group, independent of the target IGP value. No step equates a derived quantity to a fitted input or renames a known result; all reductions are explicit algebraic or analytic derivations from the stated definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the work builds on the recently emerged concept of imaginarity as a resource and the standard framework of dynamical resource theories in quantum mechanics. No explicit free parameters beyond the purity constraint are detailed.

free parameters (1)

purity level
IGP analysis is performed under purity constraints on input states, serving as a parameter in the exact expression and averages.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Hilbert-Schmidt norm provides a valid measure of imaginarity that is monotone under real unital operations.
Explicitly stated as shown in the work to support the resource theory approach.
domain assumption Dynamical resource theories provide the appropriate framework for analyzing generation of imaginarity by unitaries.
The entire analysis is framed within this approach.

invented entities (1)

Imaginarity-generating power (IGP) no independent evidence
purpose: To quantify the ability of unitary operations to produce imaginarity from initially real quantum states.
Newly introduced quantity in this work; no independent evidence outside the paper is mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1580 out tokens · 106065 ms · 2026-05-07T13:14:14.723828+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

={Θ : Λ d1→d2 Θ − →Λd′ 1→d′ 2 }while preserv- ing the complete positivity and trace preservation [76, 77]. We now describe the general framework of a dynamical re- source theory, consisting of three key components: (i)Free superoperations(Fdyn O ⊆Π (d1,d2)→(d′ 1,d′ 2)) – a class of higher- order maps that transform quantum channels inΛ d1→d2 into quantum ...
[2]

In essence, it serves as a quantitative measure of the resource present in a given channel within the underlying resource-theoretic frame- work

∈ F dyn O , i.e.,F dyn S F dyn O − − → Fdyn S ; (iii)Dynamical resource monotone(f) – a function that as- signs a non-negative real value to each quantum channel, i.e.,f: Λ d1→d2 →R ≥0, with the defining property that it does not increase under free superoperations, namely, i.e., f(Λ d1→d2)≥f(Θ(Λ d1→d2))∀Θ∈ F SO. In essence, it serves as a quantitative me...
[3]

In the preceding discussion, we derived the IGP, ¯IB(U) P , for a fixed purityP, as given in Eq

Average of ¯IB(U) P over the purityP Let us evaluate the IGP of a unitary operatorUover the set of all real states. In the preceding discussion, we derived the IGP, ¯IB(U) P , for a fixed purityP, as given in Eq. (7). We now extend this notion by averaging over all possible values ofP, thereby obtaining the IGP ofUover the entire set of real states. Since...
[4]

Prepare a maximally entangled state|ϕ +⟩= 1√ d Pd i=1 |ii⟩. 6
[5]

Prepare two copies ofUand apply them locally, i.e., implementU⊗Uon the state|ϕ +⟩, leading to the output stateρ out =U⊗U|ϕ +⟩⟨ϕ+|U † ⊗U †
[6]

Measure the fidelityF=⟨ϕ +|ρout|ϕ+⟩of the resulting state with respect to|ϕ +⟩from which one immediately obtains|Tr U †U ∗ |2 =d 2 F[89–93]. 1 2Apply local unitaries 3Measure ﬁdelity |ϕ+⟩=1 d d ∑i |ii⟩ (U⊗U)|ϕ+⟩ F=|⟨ϕ+|U⊗U|ϕ+⟩|2 A1 A2 U U |ϕ+⟩ Maximally entangled Still maximally entangled U⊗U|ϕ+⟩ Projection on |ϕ+⟩ Prepare Bell state FIG. 1.Schematic illu...
[7]

Technology Vertical - Quantum Communi- cation

= 1 2 Tr(ρ2 R)−Tr(U 1ρR U † 1 U ∗ 1 ρR U T 1 ) = 1 2 Tr(ρ2 R)−Tr(M ∗ 1 ρR M1ρR) ,(17) whereM 1 = (O 1U O2)†(O1U O2)∗ =O T 2 U †U ∗O2 = OT 2 M O2, withM=U †U ∗, andU ∗ denoting the complex conjugate ofUin the basisB. 7 We now perform the Haar average over the setΣ1, yielding ¯IB(U1) = 1 2 Tr(ρ2 R) ρR ∈Σ1 − Tr(M∗ 1 ρR M1ρR) ρR ∈Σ1 = 1 2 Tr(ρ′2 R ) ρ′ R ∈Σ1 ...

2024
[8]

Chitambar and G

E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019)

2019
[9]

C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schu- macher, Concentrating partial entanglement by local opera- 15 tions, Phys. Rev. A53, 2046 (1996)

2046
[10]

C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error cor- rection, Phys. Rev. A54, 3824 (1996)

1996
[11]

Vedral, M

V . Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Quan- tifying entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2275 (1997)

1997
[12]

Vedral and M

V . Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement measures and pu- rification procedures, Phys. Rev. A57, 1619 (1998)

1998
[13]

Vidal, Entanglement of pure states for a single copy, Phys

G. Vidal, Entanglement of pure states for a single copy, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1046 (1999)

1999
[15]

Vidal, Entanglement monotones, Journal of Modern Optics 47, 355 (2000)

G. Vidal, Entanglement monotones, Journal of Modern Optics 47, 355 (2000)

2000
[16]

Baumgratz, M

T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. Plenio, Quantifying coher- ence, Physical Review Letters113, 140401 (2014)

2014
[17]

Streltsov, G

A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium : Quantum coherence as a resource, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 041003 (2017)

2017
[18]

Winter and D

A. Winter and D. Yang, Operational resource theory of coher- ence, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120404 (2016)

2016
[19]

Streltsov, U

A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, and G. Adesso, Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement, Physical Review Letters115, 020403 (2015)

2015
[20]

Streltsov, H

A. Streltsov, H. Kampermann, S. W ¨olk, M. Gessner, and D. Bruß, Maximal coherence and the resource theory of pu- rity, New Journal of Physics20, 053058 (2018)

2018
[21]

F. G. S. L. Brand ˜ao, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equilibrium, Physical Review Letters 111, 250404 (2013)

2013
[22]

Janzing, P

D. Janzing, P. Wocjan, R. Zeier, R. Geiss, and T. Beth, Ther- modynamic cost of reliability and low temperatures: Tight- ening landauer’s principle and the second law, International Journal of Theoretical Physics39, 2717 (2000)

2000
[23]

Masanes and J

L. Masanes and J. Oppenheim, A general derivation and quan- tification of the third law of thermodynamics, Nature Commu- nications8, 14538 (2017)

2017
[24]

Brand ˜ao, M

F. Brand ˜ao, M. Horodecki, N. Ng, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, The second laws of quantum thermodynamics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 3275 (2015)

2015
[25]

G. Gour, D. Jennings, F. Buscemi, R. Duan, and I. Marvian, Quantum majorization and a complete set of entropic condi- tions for quantum thermodynamics, Nature Communications 9, 5352 (2018)

2018
[26]

N. H. Y . Ng and M. P. Woods, Resource theory of quantum thermodynamics: Thermal operations and second laws (2018) pp. 625–650

2018
[27]

Veitch, S

V . Veitch, S. A. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation, New Journal of Physics16, 013009 (2014)

2014
[28]

Howard and E

M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 090501 (2017)

2017
[29]

Knill, Fault-tolerant postselected quantum computation: Schemes (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0402171 [quant-ph]

E. Knill, Fault-tolerant postselected quantum computation: Schemes (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0402171 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2004
[30]

Liu and A

Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-body quantum magic, PRX Quantum3, 020333 (2022)

2022
[31]

Leone and L

L. Leone and L. Bittel, Stabilizer entropies are monotones for magic-state resource theory, Phys. Rev. A110, L040403 (2024)

2024
[32]

Bravyi and A

S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Physical Review A71, 022316 (2005)

2005
[33]

Hickey and G

A. Hickey and G. Gour, Quantifying the imaginarity of quan- tum mechanics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical51, 414009 (2018)

2018
[34]

W. K. Wootters, Entanglement sharing in real-vector-space quantum theory, Foundations of Physics42, 19 (2012)

2012
[35]

Hardy and W

L. Hardy and W. K. Wootters, Limited holism and real-vector- space quantum theory, Foundations of Physics42, 454 (2012)

2012
[36]

Aleksandrova, V

A. Aleksandrova, V . Borish, and W. K. Wootters, Real-vector- space quantum theory with a universal quantum bit, Phys. Rev. A87, 052106 (2013)

2013
[37]

W. K. Wootters, Optimal information transfer and real-vector- space quantum theory (2013), arXiv:1301.2018 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[38]

Moretti and M

V . Moretti and M. Oppio, Quantum theory in real hilbert space: How the complex hilbert space structure emerges from poincar´e symmetry, Reviews in Mathematical Physics29, 1750021 (2017)

2017
[39]

Renou, D

M.-O. Renou, D. Trillo, M. Weilenmann, T. P. Le, A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, A. Ac´ın, and M. Navascu´es, Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified, Nature600, 625 (2021)

2021
[40]

Li, Y .-L

Z.-D. Li, Y .-L. Mao, M. Weilenmann, A. Tavakoli, H. Chen, L. Feng, S.-J. Yang, M.-O. Renou, D. Trillo, T. P. Le, N. Gisin, A. Ac ´ın, M. Navascu ´es, Z. Wang, and J. Fan, Testing real quantum theory in an optical quantum network, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 040402 (2022)

2022
[41]

M.-C. Chen, C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, J.-W. Wang, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, Y . Wu, M. Gong, H. Deng, F.-T. Liang, Q. Zhang, C.- Z. Peng, X. Zhu, A. Cabello, C.-Y . Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 040403 (2022)

2022
[42]

Wu, Y .-F

D. Wu, Y .-F. Jiang, X.-M. Gu, L. Huang, B. Bai, Q.-C. Sun, X. Zhang, S.-Q. Gong, Y . Mao, H.-S. Zhong, M.-C. Chen, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, C.-Y . Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental refutation of real-valued quantum mechanics under strict lo- cality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 140401 (2022)

2022
[43]

Bednorz and J

A. Bednorz and J. Batle, Optimal discrimination between real and complex quantum theories, Phys. Rev. A106, 042207 (2022)

2022
[44]

J. Yao, H. Chen, Y .-L. Mao, Z.-D. Li, and J. Fan, Proposals for ruling out real quantum theories in an entanglement-swapping quantum network with causally independent sources, Phys. Rev. A109, 012211 (2024)

2024
[45]

K.-D. Wu, T. V . Kondra, S. Rana, C. M. Scandolo, G.-Y . Xi- ang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Operational re- source theory of imaginarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 090401 (2021)

2021
[46]

Zhu, Hiding and masking quantum information in com- plex and real quantum mechanics, Phys

H. Zhu, Hiding and masking quantum information in com- plex and real quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033176 (2021)

2021
[47]

Miyazaki and K

J. Miyazaki and K. Matsumoto, Imaginarity-free quantum multiparameter estimation, Quantum6, 665 (2022)

2022
[48]

Sajjan, V

M. Sajjan, V . Singh, R. Selvarajan, and S. Kais, Imaginary components of out-of-time-order correlator and information scrambling for navigating the learning landscape of a quantum machine learning model, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013146 (2023)

2023
[49]

Budiyono and H

A. Budiyono and H. K. Dipojono, Quantifying quantum coher- ence via kirkwood-dirac quasiprobability, Phys. Rev. A107, 022408 (2023)

2023
[50]

Wei and S.-M

Z.-W. Wei and S.-M. Fei, Nonlocal advantages of quantum imaginarity, Phys. Rev. A110, 052202 (2024)

2024
[51]

T. Haug, K. Bharti, and D. E. Koh, Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust, Quantum9, 1759 (2025). 16

2025
[52]

Zanardi, C

P. Zanardi, C. Zalka, and L. Faoro, Entangling power of quan- tum evolutions, Phys. Rev. A62, 030301 (2000)

2000
[53]

Linowski, G

T. Linowski, G. Rajchel-Mieldzio ´c, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Entangling power of multipartite unitary gates, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 125303 (2020)

2020
[54]

Eisert, Entangling power and quantum circuit complexity, Phys

J. Eisert, Entangling power and quantum circuit complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 020501 (2021)

2021
[55]

X. Qiu, Z. Song, and L. Chen, Multipartite entangling power by von neumann entropy, Phys. Rev. A111, 022407 (2025)

2025
[56]

Mondal, S

S. Mondal, S. K. Hazra, and A. Sen(De), Imperfect entangling power of quantum gates, Phys. Rev. A112, 012417 (2025)

2025
[57]

Samanta, S

M. Samanta, S. Mondal, S. K. Hazra, and A. Sen (De), Hier- archies among genuine multipartite entangling capabilities of quantum gates, Phys. Rev. A113, 012612 (2026)

2026
[58]

Samanta, S

M. Samanta, S. Mondal, and A. S. De, Disparity between multipartite entangling and disentangling powers of unitaries: Even vs odd (2025), arXiv:2505.18539 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Cho and J

K. Cho and J. Bang, Entangling power and its deviation: A quantitative analysis on input-state dependence and variability in entanglement generation, Phys. Rev. A113, 012442 (2026)

2026
[60]

Zanardi, G

P. Zanardi, G. Styliaris, and L. Campos Venuti, Coherence- generating power of quantum unitary maps and beyond, Phys. Rev. A95, 052306 (2017)

2017
[61]

Zanardi, G

P. Zanardi, G. Styliaris, and L. Campos Venuti, Measures of coherence-generating power for quantum unital operations, Phys. Rev. A95, 052307 (2017)

2017
[62]

Styliaris, L

G. Styliaris, L. Campos Venuti, and P. Zanardi, Coherence- generating power of quantum dephasing processes, Phys. Rev. A97, 032304 (2018)

2018
[63]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012
[64]

T. J. Elliott, Strict advantage of complex quantum theory in a communication task, Phys. Rev. A111, 062401 (2025)

2025
[65]

K.-D. Wu, T. V . Kondra, C. M. Scandolo, S. Rana, G.-Y . Xi- ang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Resource theory of imaginarity in distributed scenarios, Communications Physics 7, 171 (2024)

2024
[66]

M. B. Ruskai, S. Szarek, and E. Werner, An analysis of completely-positive trace-preserving maps on m2, Linear Al- gebra and its Applications347, 159 (2002)

2002
[67]

Kraus, A

K. Kraus, A. B ¨ohm, J. D. Dollard, and W. H. Wootters, eds., States, Effects, and Operations Fundamental Notions of Quan- tum Theory, V ol. 190 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1983)

1983
[68]

Du and Z

S. Du and Z. Bai, Quantifying imaginarity in terms of pure- state imaginarity, Phys. Rev. A111, 022405 (2025)

2025
[69]

Wu and Z

C. Wu and Z. Wu, Two imaginarity monotones induced by unified(α, β)-relative entropy, Communications in Theoreti- cal Physics77, 095101 (2025)

2025
[70]

M. Guo, S. Huang, B. Li, and S. Fei, Quantifying the imaginar- ity via different distance measures, Advanced Quantum Tech- nologies8, 10.1002/qute.202400562 (2025)

work page doi:10.1002/qute.202400562 2025
[71]

Q. Chen, T. Gao, and F. Yan, Measures of imaginarity and quantum state order, Science China Physics, Mechanics amp; Astronomy66, 10.1007/s11433-023-2126-9 (2023)

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2126-9 2023
[72]

B. Zhou, M. Chen, H. Wen, and H. Cao, Geometric robustness and infidelity of imaginarity, Laser Physics Letters22, 115205 (2025)

2025
[73]

P ´erez-Garc´ıa, M

D. P ´erez-Garc´ıa, M. M. Wolf, D. Petz, and M. B. Ruskai, Contractivity of positive and trace-preserving maps under lp norms, Journal of Mathematical Physics47, 10.1063/1.2218675 (2006)

work page doi:10.1063/1.2218675 2006
[74]

Wang and S

X. Wang and S. G. Schirmer, Contractivity of the hilbert- schmidt distance under open-system dynamics, Physical Re- view A79, 052326 (2009)

2009
[75]

Gour and C

G. Gour and C. M. Scandolo, Dynamical resources (2020), arXiv:2101.01552 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[76]

Gour and C

G. Gour and C. M. Scandolo, Dynamical entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180505 (2020)

2020
[77]

Ji and E

K. Ji and E. Chitambar, Entropic and operational characteri- zations of dynamic quantum resources, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory71, 7753–7787 (2025)

2025
[78]

Hsieh, Resource preservability, Quantum4, 244 (2020)

C.-Y . Hsieh, Resource preservability, Quantum4, 244 (2020)

2020
[79]

Saxena, E

G. Saxena, E. Chitambar, and G. Gour, Dynamical resource theory of quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023298 (2020)

2020
[80]

Skrzypczyk and N

P. Skrzypczyk and N. Linden, Robustness of measurement, discrimination games, and accessible information, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140403 (2019)

2019
[81]

Liu and A

Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Resource theories of quantum channels and the universal role of resource erasure (2019), arXiv:1904.04201 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.