pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26925 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

The effect of spectral resolution on biosignature detection via reflected light observations of the Earth through time

Samantha Gilbert-Janizek , Jacob Lustig-Yaeger , Joshua Krissansen-Totton
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 10:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords biosignaturesspectral resolutionexoplanet atmospheresHabitable Worlds Observatoryreflected light spectroscopyatmospheric retrievalsEarth through timeO2 detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nominal resolutions of 140 in the visible and 70 in the near-infrared suffice to detect key biosignatures like oxygen across atmospheres from Archean to modern Earth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests how much detail in reflected light spectra is needed to spot gases that could indicate life or habitability on planets like Earth at different stages of its past. It combines calculations of signal detectability with full atmospheric retrievals and realistic noise models to show that moderate resolutions meet the requirements without forcing longer observation times or higher detector performance demands. The work matters because it directly informs the instrument design for NASA's planned Habitable Worlds Observatory, where choices about resolution affect whether the mission can feasibly search for life on many targets. If the findings hold, current baseline plans can proceed without major adjustments while still allowing reliable detection of oxygen in recent atmospheres and characterization of earlier ones.

Core claim

A resolving power of 140 in the visible band detects O2 in Phanerozoic-like atmospheres, while 70 in the near-infrared characterizes all Earth-through-time cases including avoidance of a CO-CO2 degeneracy that could produce false positives for abundant CO. Higher visible resolutions can shorten exposure times for low-O2 Proterozoic cases only if dark current drops by more than a factor of ten, yet they roughly double the time needed to detect H2O. Indirect inference of low-O2 atmospheres via O3 at R_UV around 7 offers a more efficient alternative. These outcomes support the observatory's current baseline resolution choices.

What carries the argument

Analytical detectability calculations across R from 20 to 5000 combined with rfast radiative transfer retrievals and pyEDITH wavelength-dependent noise modeling.

If this is right

  • O3 Hartley-Huggins bands allow indirect detection of low-O2 atmospheres at very low UV resolution around 7.
  • R_NIR of at least 40 is required to break the CO-CO2 degeneracy and prevent false positive CO detections.
  • The nominal settings balance biosignature detectability against exposure time and detector noise constraints for all historical Earth cases.
  • Increasing visible resolution beyond 140 offers limited gains for low-O2 cases while increasing H2O detection times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Instrument teams could prioritize reductions in detector dark current over further increases in spectral resolution for visible observations.
  • The modeling approach could be applied to other proposed exoplanet missions or to ground-based high-contrast imaging to guide their resolution choices.
  • Validation against actual reflected-light spectra of solar system bodies observed at comparable resolutions would test the noise and retrieval assumptions directly.
  • Emphasizing UV coverage for ozone alongside visible oxygen searches could strengthen overall biosignature strategies for future telescopes.

Load-bearing premise

The assumed atmospheric compositions for Archean, Proterozoic, and Phanerozoic epochs plus the pyEDITH noise model accurately represent real exoplanet observations and instrument performance without unmodeled systematics.

What would settle it

Retrieve atmospheric properties from synthetic spectra of a known Earth-like planet generated at R_Vis=140 and R_NIR=70 and check whether O2, O3, H2O, CH4, CO2 and CO are recovered at the predicted confidence levels without the expected exposure-time penalties or degeneracies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26925 by Jacob Lustig-Yaeger, Joshua Krissansen-Totton, Samantha Gilbert-Janizek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SNR as a function of wavelength for the visible and near-infrared resolution retrieval investigations using the exposure time calculator. When visible resolution is under investigation, the resolution in the near-infrared wavelengths is held at the nominal value (and vice versa when the near-infrared resolution is under investigation). Increased resolution leads to decreased SNR, while decreased resolution… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Exposure time required for gas detection as a function of resolution for key gases in corresponding band-passes for all Earth through time cases explored in this study, assuming the nominal dark current (3 × 10−5 e-/pixel/s) throughout. Here, “VIS” (top row) is shorthand for the visible band-pass, and “NIR” (bottom row) is shorthand for the near-infrared band￾pass. The dashed vertical lines indicate the no… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contour plots showing the relationship between dark current, visible band-pass resolution, and exposure time required for molecular detection. (a) High-CH4 Proterozoic Earth: (i) H2O, (ii) O2, (iii) O3. While higher visible resolution correlates with lower relative exposure times to detect O2 at low Proterozoic abundances, detection remains infeasible in a reasonable time for all cases. (b) Phanerozoic Ear… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Retrieval results with varying spectral resolution across Earth analog scenarios. (a) Proterozoic Earth, visible band-pass (NIR held at R = 70, t = 81.63 hrs). (b) Phanerozoic Earth, visible band-pass (NIR held at R = 70, t = 81.63 hrs). In both (a) and (b), no advantage is conferred by higher visible resolution for O2, O3, and H2O features. (c) Archean Earth, near-IR (VIS held at R = 140, t = 8163.27 hrs)… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A comparison of the marginal and covari￾ance plots of the retrieved CO2 and CO abundances for the Phanerozoic Earth, with RNIR = 20 and the nominal RNIR = 70. When the spectral resolution in the near-IR is lowered to 20, the retrieval results suggest that the data fa￾vors an inaccurately high abundance of CO combined with lower CO2 abundances. In the near-IR, we are primarily concerned with de￾tecting and/… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Full corner plot for the high-CH4 Proterozoic case, including the nominal spectral resolution (RVis = 140) and higher resolutions (RVis = 200, 500, and 1000) in the visible (VIS) wavelengths view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Full corner plot for the Phanerozoic case, including the nominal spectral resolution (RVis = 140) and higher resolutions (RVis = 200, 500, and 1000) in the visible (VIS) wavelengths view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Full corner plot for the Late Archean case, including the nominal spectral resolution (RNIR = 70) and lower resolutions (RVis = 60, 50, 40, and 20) in the near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Full corner plot for the Phanerozoic case, including the nominal spectral resolution (RNIR = 70) and lower resolutions (RVis = 60, 50, 40, and 20) in the near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cloud parameter retrieval diagnostics for the near-IR channel as a function of spectral resolution for the Phanerozoic (blue circles) and Late Archean (red diamonds) atmospheric cases. Each column shows a different cloud parameter: cloud-top pressure (pt), cloud opacity (τc), and cloud fraction (fc). The left-hand y-axis shows the posterior standard deviation and the right-hand y-axis shows the relative p… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cloud-top pressure (pt) retrieval diagnostics for the visible channel as a function of spectral resolution for the Phanerozoic (blue circles) and High-CH4 Proterozoic (orange squares) atmospheric cases. The left-hand y-axis shows posterior standard deviation and the right-hand y-axis shows relative precision (σ/ℓtrue), both computed in log10 space. Both atmospheric cases show modest but consistent improve… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

NASA's Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will search for biosignatures on Earth-like exoplanets using reflected light spectroscopy. A critical instrument design parameter is resolving power, which must balance biosignature detectability against exposure time and detector noise constraints. We assess the resolving power needed to detect and characterize key biosignature gases and habitability indicators including O$_2$, O$_3$, H$_2$O, CH$_4$, CO$_2$ and CO across atmospheres representing the Archean, Proterozoic, and Phanerozoic Earth. We combine analytical detectability calculations spanning spectral resolutions ($\lambda/\Delta{\lambda}$) $R=20$-$5000$ with atmospheric retrievals using the rfast radiative transfer model and pyEDITH exposure time calculator for realistic wavelength-dependent noise modeling. In the visible ($0.4$-$1.0$ $\mu$m), the nominal resolution $R_{Vis}=140$ is sufficient for detecting O$_2$ in Phanerozoic-like atmospheres. Higher resolutions could theoretically reduce exposure times for low-O$_2$ Proterozoic atmospheres, but require $>10\times$ reductions in dark current and could increase H$_2$O detection exposure times by $\sim 2\times$, penalizing the foundational habitability constraint that anchors downstream biosignature searches. The most efficient path for low-O$_2$ atmospheres may instead be indirect inference via O$_3$, whose Hartley-Huggins bands are detectable at $R_{UV}\sim 7$. In the near-IR ($1.0$-$1.7$ $\mu$m), $R_{NIR}\geq40$ is necessary to avoid a degeneracy between CO$_2$ and CO that could produce false positive detections of abundant CO. The nominal $R_{NIR}=70$ is sufficient for characterizing all Earth-through-time cases. These results support HWO's current baseline resolution choices and provide actionable guidance for finalizing spectrometer requirements while maintaining technological feasibility for the search for life on exoplanets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript assesses the spectral resolving power required to detect and characterize biosignatures (O2, O3, H2O, CH4, CO2, CO) and habitability indicators in reflected-light spectra of Earth through time (Archean, Proterozoic, Phanerozoic epochs). It combines analytical detectability calculations over R=20–5000 with rfast retrievals and pyEDITH wavelength-dependent noise modeling, concluding that nominal R_Vis=140 suffices for O2 detection in Phanerozoic-like atmospheres, R_NIR=70 suffices for all cases, and higher R offers limited benefit for low-O2 atmospheres without major dark-current improvements; indirect O3 detection at low R_UV is suggested as an alternative.

Significance. If the noise model and atmospheric assumptions hold, the work supplies concrete, actionable guidance for finalizing spectrometer requirements on the Habitable Worlds Observatory by quantifying resolution–exposure-time–dark-current trade-offs across geological epochs. The dual use of analytical SNR calculations and full retrievals, plus explicit discussion of model limitations, strengthens the support for current HWO baseline choices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Noise modeling / pyEDITH description] Noise modeling section: pyEDITH supplies wavelength-dependent noise but omits a full end-to-end treatment of stellar variability, pointing jitter, and detector persistence. If these systematics contribute at the 10–20 % level, the effective SNR at the O2 A-band drops and the resolution needed to maintain 5-sigma detection in Phanerozoic cases may exceed the nominal R_Vis=140.
  2. [Results (low-O2 atmospheres)] Results on low-O2 Proterozoic cases: the statement that higher R could reduce exposure times only if dark current falls >10× is presented as a model-dependent trade-off; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the exposure-time curves and detection thresholds are to plausible variations in the dark-current assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that R_NIR ≥40 avoids the CO2–CO degeneracy is stated separately from the nominal R_NIR=70; clarify whether 40 is the strict minimum or if 70 is adopted for additional characterization reasons.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends: ensure all panels explicitly label the three epochs and the exact R values tested so readers can directly map results to the text without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing honest responses based on the scope of our analysis. We have incorporated revisions where they strengthen the work without altering its core conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Noise modeling section: pyEDITH supplies wavelength-dependent noise but omits a full end-to-end treatment of stellar variability, pointing jitter, and detector persistence. If these systematics contribute at the 10–20 % level, the effective SNR at the O2 A-band drops and the resolution needed to maintain 5-sigma detection in Phanerozoic cases may exceed the nominal R_Vis=140.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation regarding the scope of our noise model. pyEDITH, as used in Section 2.3, incorporates wavelength-dependent photon noise, read noise, and dark current for the specified detector parameters, enabling the analytical SNR calculations and rfast retrievals presented. We agree that it does not include a full end-to-end treatment of additional systematics such as stellar variability, pointing jitter, or detector persistence. In the revised manuscript, we will add explicit language in the methods and limitations sections acknowledging that if these effects contribute at the 10-20% level, the effective SNR at the O2 A-band could decrease, potentially increasing the resolution or exposure time needed for 5-sigma detections in Phanerozoic cases. Our conclusions are framed within the assumptions of the current noise model, which we believe still provides actionable guidance for HWO requirements. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results on low-O2 Proterozoic cases: the statement that higher R could reduce exposure times only if dark current falls >10× is presented as a model-dependent trade-off; the manuscript should quantify how sensitive the exposure-time curves and detection thresholds are to plausible variations in the dark-current assumption.

    Authors: We agree that further quantification of the sensitivity to dark current assumptions would improve the clarity of the trade-off discussion for low-O2 Proterozoic atmospheres. The manuscript already notes the >10× dark current reduction requirement as a model-dependent result. In the revised version, we will add a sensitivity analysis, including updated exposure-time curves and detection threshold plots for dark current reduction factors of 1×, 5×, 10×, and 20×. This will explicitly show how the required resolutions and exposure times respond to variations in this parameter, allowing readers to better evaluate the robustness of the conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from external forward models and retrievals

full rationale

The paper derives resolution requirements via analytical detectability calculations and rfast retrievals fed by the pyEDITH noise model applied to fixed atmospheric compositions for Archean/Proterozoic/Phanerozoic epochs. No equations reduce outputs to inputs by construction, no parameters are fitted to the target claims, and no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked. The nominal R_Vis=140 and R_NIR=70 conclusions follow directly from the stated simulations rather than presupposing them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Claims rest on standard domain assumptions about past Earth atmospheres and instrument noise rather than new postulates; no free parameters are explicitly fitted to the detection results themselves.

free parameters (1)
  • Tested spectral resolution range
    R=20 to 5000 selected to bracket instrument design space; not fitted to data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Atmospheric compositions for Archean, Proterozoic, and Phanerozoic epochs match prior geological models
    Used as input for all detectability calculations.
  • domain assumption pyEDITH provides accurate wavelength-dependent noise for HWO-like instruments
    Underpins exposure time estimates and trade-off conclusions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5689 in / 1348 out tokens · 84743 ms · 2026-05-07T10:14:07.536139+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    flux densities

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2021

  4. [4]

    Alei, E., & Currie, M. H. 2025, pyEDITH : a Python -based coronagraphic exposure time calculator for the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) , Software documentation. https://pyedith.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    2025

  5. [5]

    M., Currie , M

    Alei , E., Mandell , A. M., Currie , M. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05279, 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05279

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.05279 2025

  6. [6]

    2025, Claude S onnet 4.6 [Large language model], Accessed 2025

    Anthropic. 2025, Claude S onnet 4.6 [Large language model], Accessed 2025. https://claude.ai

    2025

  7. [7]

    J., Hood, A

    Bellefroid, E. J., Hood, A. v. S., Hoffman, P. F., et al. 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 8104

    2018

  8. [8]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 753, 100

    Benneke, B., & Seager, S. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 753, 100

    2012

  9. [9]

    R., Jones, G

    Borges, S. R., Jones, G. G., & Robinson, T. D. 2024, Astrobiology, 24, 283

    2024

  10. [10]

    D., & Spiegel, D

    Brandt, T. D., & Spiegel, D. S. 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13278

    2014

  11. [11]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1008

    Carter, A., May, E., Espinoza, N., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1008

    2024

  12. [12]

    C., Kiang Nancy, Y., Robinson Tyler, D., Rushby Andrew, J., et al

    Catling, D. C., Kiang Nancy, Y., Robinson Tyler, D., Rushby Andrew, J., et al. 2018, Astrobiology

    2018

  13. [13]

    C., Zahnle, K

    Catling, D. C., Zahnle, K. J., & McKay, C. P. 2001, Science, 293, 839

    2001

  14. [14]

    2021, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 200

    Damiano, M., & Hu, R. 2021, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 200

    2021

  15. [15]

    2022, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 299

    ---. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 299

    2022

  16. [16]

    2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 157

    Damiano, M., Hu, R., & Mennesson, B. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 157

    2023

  17. [17]

    J., Harwit, M

    Des Marais, D. J., Harwit, M. O., Jucks, K. W., et al. 2002, Astrobiology, 2, 153

    2002

  18. [18]

    D., Segura, A., Claire, M

    Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Segura, A., Claire, M. W., Robinson, T. D., & Meadows, V. S. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 90

    2014

  19. [19]

    W., & Fournier, G

    Ebadirad, S., Lyons, T. W., & Fournier, G. P. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21919

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    D., Sitarski, B

    Feinberg, L. D., Sitarski, B. N., McElwain, M. W., et al. 2026, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11803

    work page arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    K., Robinson, T

    Feng, Y. K., Robinson, T. D., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 200

    2018

  22. [22]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306

    2013

  23. [23]

    D., Li, C., & Yung, Y

    Gao, P., Hu, R., Robinson, T. D., Li, C., & Yung, Y. L. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 249

    2015

  24. [24]

    S., Seager, S., Mennesson, B., et al

    Gaudi, B. S., Seager, S., Mennesson, B., et al. 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.06683

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    S., & Lustig-Yaeger, J

    Gilbert-Janizek, S., Meadows, V. S., & Lustig-Yaeger, J. 2024, The Planetary Science Journal, 5, 148

    2024

  26. [26]

    J., Lewis, N

    Gomez Barrientos, J., MacDonald, R. J., Lewis, N. K., & Kaltenegger, L. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 946, 96

    2023

  27. [27]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, e. R., et al. 2022, Journal of quantitative spectroscopy and radiative transfer, 277, 107949

    2022

  28. [28]

    M., et al

    Hagee , C., Latouf , N., Mandell , A. M., et al. 2026

    2026

  29. [29]

    Hall, S., Krissansen-Totton, J., Robinson, T., Salvador, A., & Fortney, J. J. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 254

    2023

  30. [30]

    G., Kent, R., Kaltenegger, L., & Rothschild, L

    Hegde, S., Paulino-Lima, I. G., Kent, R., Kaltenegger, L., & Rothschild, L. 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 3886

    2015

  31. [31]

    Hu, R., Peterson, L., & Wolf, E. T. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 888, 122

    2020

  32. [32]

    Kasting, J. F. 2005, Precambrian Research, 137, 119

    2005

  33. [33]

    J., Nimmo, F., & Wogan, N

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Fortney, J. J., Nimmo, F., & Wogan, N. 2021, AGU Advances, 2, e2020AV000294

    2021

  34. [34]

    L., & Fortney, J

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Thompson, M., Galloway, M. L., & Fortney, J. J. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 189

    2022

  35. [35]

    G., Frissell, M., et al

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Ulses, A. G., Frissell, M., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14771

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Kump, L. R. 2008, Nature, 451, 277

    2008

  37. [37]

    D., Mandell, A

    Latouf, N., Himes, M. D., Mandell, A. M., et al. 2025, The Astronomical Journal, 169, 50

    2025

  38. [38]

    M., Villanueva, G

    Latouf, N., Mandell, A. M., Villanueva, G. L., et al. 2023 a , The Astronomical Journal, 166, 129

    2023

  39. [39]

    2023 b , The Astronomical Journal, 167, 27

    ---. 2023 b , The Astronomical Journal, 167, 27

    2023

  40. [40]

    2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06219

    LUVOIR Team and others . 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06219

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    W., Reinhard, C

    Lyons, T. W., Reinhard, C. T., & Planavsky, N. J. 2014, Nature, 506, 307

    2014

  42. [42]

    2014, Educause Review

    McCartney, G., Hacker, T., & Yang, B. 2014, Educause Review. https://tinyurl.com/2fd6b934

    2014

  43. [43]

    S., & Crisp, D

    Meadows, V. S., & Crisp, D. 1996, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 101, 4595

    1996

  44. [44]

    S., Reinhard, C

    Meadows, V. S., Reinhard, C. T., Arney, G. N., et al. 2018, Astrobiology, 18, 630

    2018

  45. [45]

    2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s (The National Academies Press)

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . 2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s (The National Academies Press)

    2021

  46. [46]

    J., Reinhard, C

    Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., Wang, X., et al. 2014, science, 346, 635

    2014

  47. [47]

    Ragsdale, S. W. 2004, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 39, 165

    2004

  48. [48]

    W., Leung, M., Harman, C

    Ranjan, S., Schwieterman, E. W., Leung, M., Harman, C. E., & Hu, R. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 958, L15

    2023

  49. [49]

    D., & Salvador, A

    Robinson, T. D., & Salvador, A. 2023, The Planetary Science Journal, 4, 10

    2023

  50. [50]

    Characterizing Earth analogs may require a moderate or high-resolution spectrograph

    Ruffio, J.-B., Steiger, S., Spohn, C., et al. 2026, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17554

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    2018 a , arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02744

    Schwieterman, E., Reinhard, C., Olson, S., & Lyons, T. 2018 a , arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02744

    work page arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    W., & Leung, M

    Schwieterman, E. W., & Leung, M. 2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 465

    2024

  53. [53]

    W., Reinhard, C

    Schwieterman, E. W., Reinhard, C. T., Olson, S. L., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 874, 9

    2019

  54. [54]

    W., Kiang, N

    Schwieterman, E. W., Kiang, N. Y., Parenteau, M. N., et al. 2018 b , Astrobiology, 18, 663

    2018

  55. [55]

    L., Schafer, J., & Ford, E

    Seager, S., Turner, E. L., Schafer, J., & Ford, E. B. 2005, Astrobiology, 5, 372

    2005

  56. [56]

    C., Roberge, A., Mandell, A., & Robinson, T

    Stark , C. C., Roberge , A., Mandell , A., & Robinson , T. D. 2014, , 795, 122, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/122

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/122 2014

  57. [57]

    C., Steiger, S., Tokadjian, A., et al

    Stark, C. C., Steiger, S., Tokadjian, A., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18556

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    2026, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 12, 041005

    Steiger, S., Chen, P., & Pueyo, L. 2026, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 12, 041005

    2026

  59. [59]

    A., Krissansen-Totton, J., Wogan, N., Telus, M., & Fortney, J

    Thompson, M. A., Krissansen-Totton, J., Wogan, N., Telus, M., & Fortney, J. J. 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, e2117933119

    2022

  60. [60]

    2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 292

    Tokadjian, A., Hu, R., & Damiano, M. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 292

    2024

  61. [61]

    G., Krissansen-Totton, J., Robinson, T

    Ulses, A. G., Krissansen-Totton, J., Robinson, T. D., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 990, 48

    2025

  62. [62]

    2016, Icarus, 266, 15

    Wang, Y., Tian, F., Li, T., & Hu, Y. 2016, Icarus, 266, 15

    2016

  63. [63]

    C., Gao , P., Wogan , N., Saxena , P., & Wilkins , J

    Washington III , R. C., Gao , P., Wogan , N., Saxena , P., & Wilkins , J. 2026

    2026

  64. [64]

    F., & Catling, D

    Wogan, N. F., & Catling, D. C. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 892, 127

    2020

  65. [65]

    D., et al

    Young , A., Arney , G., Robinson , T. D., et al. 2026

    2026

  66. [66]

    V., Crouse, J., Arney, G., et al

    Young, A. V., Crouse, J., Arney, G., et al. 2024, The Planetary Science Journal, 5, 7

    2024

  67. [67]

    V., Robinson, T

    Young, A. V., Robinson, T. D., Krissansen-Totton, J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 206

    2025

  68. [68]

    S., & Catling, D

    Zahnle, K., Freedman, R. S., & Catling, D. C. 2011, Icarus, 212, 493

    2011

  69. [69]

    M., Catling, D

    Zahnle, K., Haberle, R. M., Catling, D. C., & Kasting, J. F. 2008, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 113

    2008