pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26941 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ✦ hep-th · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Schwinger-Keldysh Path Integral for Gauge theories

Andrew J. Tolley, Greg Kaplanek, Maria Mylova

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 08:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th quant-ph
keywords Schwinger-Keldysh formalismBRST symmetrynon-Abelian gauge theoriesopen effective field theorySlavnov-Taylor identitiesHard Thermal Loopin-in path integralgauge fixing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Schwinger-Keldysh path integrals for non-Abelian gauge theories preserve a retarded BRST symmetry for any initial state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops the Schwinger-Keldysh path integral for open non-Abelian gauge theories gauge-fixed by the BRST method in covariant gauges, with initial states specified at finite times. It addresses the indefinite Hilbert space, constructs BRST-invariant density matrices, and uses the Nakanishi-Lautrup field representation together with the Hata-Kugo prescription to handle boundary terms. The resulting formalism yields a path integral that is manifestly invariant under a diagonal retarded BRST symmetry for both pure and mixed physical states. From this invariance the corresponding perturbative Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities are obtained, and the same symmetry is shown to survive in the influence functional after integrating out matter or hard modes. The approach also determines the structure of open effective field theories truncated at second order in advanced fields.

Core claim

The Schwinger-Keldysh path integral for BRST gauge-fixed non-Abelian gauge theories is manifestly invariant under a diagonal retarded BRST symmetry for arbitrary physical initial states, whether pure or mixed. This invariance is achieved by employing the Nakanishi-Lautrup auxiliary field representation to manage initial and final boundary conditions and by applying the Hata-Kugo prescription to the indefinite-metric Hilbert space. The naive advanced BRST symmetry is explicitly broken by the in-in boundary conditions, but the retarded diagonal version remains intact. The associated Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities therefore hold perturbatively. When charged matter or hard gluon modes

What carries the argument

The diagonal (retarded) BRST symmetry of the Schwinger-Keldysh path integral, realized through Nakanishi-Lautrup fields and the Hata-Kugo prescription for boundary terms and the indefinite metric.

If this is right

  • Perturbative Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities hold for the constructed Schwinger-Keldysh path integral.
  • The Feynman-Vernon influence functional obtained by integrating out charged matter or hard gluon modes remains BRST invariant.
  • Open EFT actions expanded to second order in advanced fields exhibit an exact symmetry under the contracted Keldysh BRST transformation.
  • This symmetry governs the leading terms of the Open EFT and applies to the Hard Thermal Loop effective theory as well as to the Higgs phase with spontaneously broken gauge symmetries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The retarded BRST symmetry may simplify the derivation of conservation laws and Ward identities for non-equilibrium gauge dynamics at finite times.
  • If non-perturbative Gribov effects can be controlled, the same construction could extend BRST methods to strongly coupled open systems.
  • The explicit form of the Open EFT in the Higgs phase suggests a systematic way to organize effective descriptions when all gauge symmetries are broken.

Load-bearing premise

The indefinite Hilbert space and initial-final boundary terms can be handled consistently by the Hata-Kugo prescription and Nakanishi-Lautrup fields for generic mixed states without introducing inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit one-loop computation of a gauge-invariant correlation function in the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism with a mixed initial state that violates the predicted Slavnov-Taylor identity.

read the original abstract

We develop the Schwinger-Keldysh path-integral formalism for open non-Abelian gauge theories that are gauge-fixed via the BRST method in covariant gauges. We focus on generic initial states, pure and mixed, specified at finite times suitable for non-equilibrium processes. We pay particular attention to the handling of the indefinite Hilbert space, the construction of BRST-invariant Schrodinger picture wavefunctionals, density matrices and inner product, the implementation of the Hata-Kugo prescription, and the role of boundary terms at both the initial and final times. We highlight the advantages of the Nakanishi-Lautrup field representation in dealing with initial/final conditions. The resulting Schwinger-Keldysh path integral is manifestly invariant under a diagonal (retarded) BRST symmetry for arbitrary physical initial states, whether pure or mixed. From this, we obtain the corresponding Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities, valid perturbatively. Non-perturbatively the Gribov ambiguity is expected to break or modify the BRST symmetry. The naive advanced BRST symmetry is shown to be explicitly violated by the in-in boundary conditions. We show that the Feynman-Vernon influence functional derived by integrating out charged matter and/or hard gluon modes remains (perturbatively) BRST invariant. When the Open EFT action is expanded to second order in advanced fields it exhibits an exact symmetry under a contraction of the original BRST symmetry. This Keldysh BRST symmetry is equivalent to the BRST associated with the retarded gauge transformations together with a linearly realized BRST transformation of the advanced fields. These govern the structure of the leading terms in an Open EFT. We illustrate this with the explicit example of Hard Thermal Loop Effective Theory, and construct the general form of the Open EFT in a Higgs phase when all gauge symmetries are spontaneously broken.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops the Schwinger-Keldysh path-integral formalism for non-Abelian gauge theories gauge-fixed via the BRST method in covariant gauges. It constructs BRST-invariant Schrödinger-picture wavefunctionals, density matrices, and inner products for generic pure and mixed initial states at finite times, using the Hata-Kugo prescription together with Nakanishi-Lautrup fields to manage the indefinite metric and boundary terms. The resulting in-in path integral is shown to be manifestly invariant under a diagonal (retarded) BRST symmetry, from which perturbative Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities follow. The advanced BRST symmetry is explicitly broken by the in-in boundary conditions. The Feynman-Vernon influence functional obtained by integrating out charged matter or hard modes remains perturbatively BRST invariant. When the Open EFT is expanded to second order in advanced fields, it exhibits an exact contracted Keldysh BRST symmetry equivalent to retarded gauge transformations plus a linear BRST action on advanced fields; this structure is illustrated for Hard Thermal Loop effective theory and for the general case in a Higgs phase with spontaneously broken gauge symmetries. Non-perturbative Gribov issues are noted as potentially modifying the symmetry.

Significance. If the central construction is correct, the work supplies a consistent BRST-invariant framework for the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism in gauge theories with arbitrary physical initial states (pure or mixed) at finite times. This is directly relevant for non-equilibrium applications such as thermal QCD, heavy-ion collisions, and open-system effective theories. The explicit handling of boundary terms via Nakanishi-Lautrup fields, the derivation of the contracted Keldysh BRST symmetry in the Open EFT, and the concrete HTL example provide concrete tools for perturbative calculations and systematic expansions. The separation of the retarded and advanced BRST sectors and the acknowledgment of Gribov limitations are appropriately cautious.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (4.18)] §4.2, Eq. (4.18) and surrounding text: the demonstration that the initial-time boundary term vanishes under the diagonal retarded BRST transformation for a generic mixed-state density matrix relies on the Hata-Kugo auxiliary conditions eliminating all non-physical contributions in the indefinite metric. While the general argument is given, it would be strengthened by an explicit check that no residual violations appear when the support of the density matrix is not strictly confined to the BRST cohomology at finite initial time.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction and §2] The distinction between the diagonal retarded BRST transformation and the standard BRST operator could be stated more explicitly in the introduction and in the definition of the symmetry (around Eq. (2.7)) to avoid possible confusion with the usual nilpotent BRST charge.
  2. [§3] A short table summarizing the transformation properties of all fields (including Nakanishi-Lautrup and ghost fields) under the retarded, advanced, and diagonal BRST transformations would improve readability of the symmetry discussion in §3.
  3. [References] The reference list is missing the original Hata-Kugo paper (Prog. Theor. Phys. 1982) and the Nakanishi-Lautrup formulation reference; these should be added for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive report. We address the single major comment below and indicate the corresponding revision.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (4.18)] §4.2, Eq. (4.18) and surrounding text: the demonstration that the initial-time boundary term vanishes under the diagonal retarded BRST transformation for a generic mixed-state density matrix relies on the Hata-Kugo auxiliary conditions eliminating all non-physical contributions in the indefinite metric. While the general argument is given, it would be strengthened by an explicit check that no residual violations appear when the support of the density matrix is not strictly confined to the BRST cohomology at finite initial time.

    Authors: We agree that the argument in §4.2 rests on the Hata-Kugo auxiliary conditions, which by construction restrict the support of the initial density matrix to the BRST cohomology. Under these conditions the boundary term vanishes identically for the diagonal retarded BRST transformation, as derived from the nilpotency of the BRST charge and the definition of the physical inner product. States whose support extends outside the cohomology correspond to unphysical configurations containing ghost or longitudinal degrees of freedom; such states are excluded from the class of generic physical initial states (pure or mixed) considered in the manuscript. An explicit check for non-physical support would therefore lie outside the scope of the work. To strengthen the presentation we will add a short clarifying paragraph immediately after Eq. (4.18) that recalls the role of the Hata-Kugo conditions and states that the vanishing holds precisely when these conditions are satisfied. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: BRST invariance derived from standard gauge-fixing prescriptions without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper constructs the Schwinger-Keldysh path integral for gauge theories using the established BRST method in covariant gauges, the Hata-Kugo prescription for the indefinite metric, and Nakanishi-Lautrup fields to handle boundary terms at finite initial/final times. The manifest invariance under the diagonal retarded BRST symmetry for arbitrary physical (pure or mixed) initial states follows directly from these standard ingredients and the properties of the BRST operator; the resulting Ward-Takahashi-Slavnov-Taylor identities are then obtained perturbatively as a consequence. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation whose validity is assumed without external support. The non-perturbative Gribov caveat is explicitly separated, confirming the perturbative claim is not forced by definition. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks of BRST formalism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The formalism rests on standard BRST quantization and Schwinger-Keldysh contour methods without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math BRST symmetry and gauge fixing in covariant gauges for non-Abelian theories
    Invoked to maintain gauge invariance in the path integral construction.
  • domain assumption Validity of Hata-Kugo prescription for indefinite Hilbert space
    Used for handling ghost and auxiliary fields in the initial/final conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1306 out tokens · 36424 ms · 2026-05-07T08:28:29.902238+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

259 extracted references · 195 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. S. Schwinger,Field theory methods in non-field theory contexts, in(transcribed by A.C. Manoharan), 3rd Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, pp. 223–374, 1960

  2. [2]

    J. S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407–432

  3. [3]

    Korenman,Nonequilibrium quantum statistics; application to the laser,Annals of Physics39(1966) 72–126

    V. Korenman,Nonequilibrium quantum statistics; application to the laser,Annals of Physics39(1966) 72–126

  4. [4]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa,Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. 1.,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 1–11

  5. [5]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa,Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. 2.,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 12–16

  6. [6]

    K. T. Mahanthappa,Multiple production of photons in quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.126 (1962) 329–340

  7. [7]

    Korenman,Dynamical computation of photon correlations and counting statistics,Phys

    V. Korenman,Dynamical computation of photon correlations and counting statistics,Phys. Rev.154 (Feb, 1967) 1233–1240

  8. [8]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr.,The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,Annals Phys.24(1963) 118–173

  9. [9]

    L. V. Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47(1964) 1515–1527. – 61 –

  10. [10]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff,Conservation Laws and Correlation Functions,Phys. Rev.124(1961) 287–299

  11. [11]

    L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym,Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Green’s Function Methods in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Problems. W. A. Benjamin, 1962

  12. [12]

    Fujita,Partial self-energy parts of kadanoff-baym,Physica30(1964) 848–856

    S. Fujita,Partial self-energy parts of kadanoff-baym,Physica30(1964) 848–856

  13. [13]

    Danielewicz,Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes

    P. Danielewicz,Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes. 1.,Annals Phys.152(1984) 239–304

  14. [14]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett,Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications121(1983) 587–616

  15. [15]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett,Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 211

  16. [16]

    B. S. DeWitt,The global approach to quantum field theory. Vol. 1, 2, vol. 114. 2003

  17. [17]

    Gauging Open EFTs from the top down,

    G. Kaplanek, M. Mylova and A. J. Tolley,Gauging Open EFTs from the top down,2512.17089

  18. [18]

    Reinhardt, G

    H. Reinhardt, G. Burgio, D. Campagnari, E. Ebadati, J. Heffner, M. Quandt et al.,Hamiltonian approach to QCD in Coulomb gauge - a survey of recent results,Adv. High Energy Phys.2018(2018) 2312498, [1706.02702]

  19. [19]

    V. N. Gribov,Quantization of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B139(1978) 1

  20. [20]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.98(1976) 287–321

  21. [21]

    I. V. Tyutin,Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism, 0812.0580

  22. [22]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of gauge systems. 1992

  23. [23]

    Ojima,Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.137(1981) 1

    I. Ojima,Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.137(1981) 1

  24. [24]

    Matsumoto, Y

    H. Matsumoto, Y. Nakano and H. Umezawa,Equivalence Theorem and Gauge Theory at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 1931

  25. [25]

    N. P. Landsman and C. G. van Weert,Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density,Phys. Rept.145(1987) 141

  26. [26]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press, 2009, 10.1017/9781009290036

  27. [27]

    D’Attanasio and M

    M. D’Attanasio and M. Pietroni,Gauge invariant renormalization group at finite temperature,Nucl. Phys. B498(1997) 443–466, [hep-th/9611038]

  28. [28]

    Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12(1957) 570–586

  29. [29]

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger,Theory of many particle systems. 1.,Phys. Rev.115(1959) 1342–1373

  30. [30]

    C. W. Bernard,Feynman Rules for Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3312

  31. [31]

    Hata and T

    H. Hata and T. Kugo,An Operator Formalism of Statistical Mechanics of Gauge Theory in Covariant Gauges,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3333

  32. [32]

    P. V. Landshoff and A. Rebhan,Covariant gauges at finite temperature,Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 607–621, [hep-ph/9205235]. – 62 –

  33. [33]

    Mills,Propagators for many-particle systems: an elementary treatment

    R. Mills,Propagators for many-particle systems: an elementary treatment. CRC Press, 1969

  34. [34]

    Craig,Perturbation expansion for real-time green’s functions,Journal of Mathematical Physics9 (1968) 605–611

    R. Craig,Perturbation expansion for real-time green’s functions,Journal of Mathematical Physics9 (1968) 605–611

  35. [35]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff,Finite Temperature Quantum Field Theory in Minkowski Space, Annals Phys.152(1984) 105

  36. [36]

    Matsumoto, H

    H. Matsumoto, H. Umezawa and J. P. Whitehead,Vacuum diagrams in perturbative thermo field dynamics,Prog. Theor. Phys.76(1986) 260–282

  37. [37]

    T. S. Evans and A. C. Pearson,A Reexamination of the path ordered approach to real time thermal field theory,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 4652–4659, [hep-ph/9412217]

  38. [38]

    H. A. Weldon,Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma,Phys. Rev. D 26(1982) 1394

  39. [39]

    Blaizot, E

    J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and R. R. Parwani,On the screening of static electromagnetic fields in hot QED plasmas,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 2543–2562, [hep-ph/9504408]

  40. [40]

    Sakagami,Evolution From Pure States Into Mixed States in De Sitter Space,Prog

    M.-a. Sakagami,Evolution From Pure States Into Mixed States in De Sitter Space,Prog. Theor. Phys. 79(1988) 442

  41. [41]

    Morikawa,Dissipation and fluctuation of quantum fields in expanding universes,Physical Review D 42(1990) 1027

    M. Morikawa,Dissipation and fluctuation of quantum fields in expanding universes,Physical Review D 42(1990) 1027

  42. [42]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu,Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 6770–6788, [gr-qc/9505046]

  43. [43]

    Lombardo and F

    F. Lombardo and F. D. Mazzitelli,Coarse graining and decoherence in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2001–2011, [hep-th/9508052]

  44. [44]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory,J. Phys. A42(2009) 504007, [0905.2562]

  45. [45]

    Franco and E

    M. Franco and E. Calzetta,Decoherence in the cosmic background radiation,Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 145024, [1103.0188]

  46. [46]

    Lopez Nacir, R

    D. Lopez Nacir, R. A. Porto, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,Dissipative effects in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP01(2012) 075, [1109.4192]

  47. [47]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk,Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 045014, [1108.3568]

  48. [48]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl,Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79(2016) 096001

  49. [49]

    Marino and S

    J. Marino and S. Diehl,Quantum dynamical field theory for nonequilibrium phase transitions in driven open systems,Physical Review B94(2016) 085150

  50. [50]

    Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation: Reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation,Phys

    D. Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation: Reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 023527, [1506.07395]

  51. [51]

    Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation

    D. Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation. II. Stochastic dynamics and power spectrum suppression,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 043501, [1511.06649]

  52. [52]

    Baidya, C

    A. Baidya, C. Jana, R. Loganayagam and A. Rudra,Renormalization in open quantum field theory. Part I. Scalar field theory,JHEP11(2017) 204, [1704.08335]

  53. [53]

    Burrage, C

    C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington and J. Min´ aˇ r,Open quantum dynamics induced by light scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 076003, [1812.08760]. – 63 –

  54. [54]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system,JHEP02(2019) 131, [1805.06240]

  55. [55]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective Lagrangian for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonequilibrium open systems,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 056020, [1907.08609]

  56. [56]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. Ruggiero and P. Calabrese,Subsystem Trace Distance in Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 141602, [1901.10993]

  57. [57]

    Nagy and J

    S. Nagy and J. Polonyi,Renormalizing Open Quantum Field Theories,Universe8(2022) 127, [2012.13811]

  58. [58]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada,A manifestly covariant theory of multifield stochastic inflation in phase space: solving the discretisation ambiguity in stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2021) 048, [2008.07497]

  59. [59]

    Chaykov, N

    S. Chaykov, N. Agarwal, S. Bahrami and R. Holman,Loop corrections in Minkowski spacetime away from equilibrium. Part II. Finite-time results,JHEP02(2023) 094, [2206.11289]

  60. [60]

    Tinwala, A

    A. Tinwala, A. Narang, S. Mohanty and S. Panda,Open EFT treatment of Inflation with Thermal Initial Conditions,2402.18494

  61. [61]

    Ota,Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background,JCAP05(2024) 062, [2402.07623]

    A. Ota,Fluctuation-dissipation relation in cosmic microwave background,JCAP05(2024) 062, [2402.07623]

  62. [62]

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,The open effective field theory of inflation,JHEP10(2024) 248, [2404.15416]

  63. [63]

    C. P. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman and G. Kaplanek,Does decoherence violate decoupling?, 2411.09000

  64. [64]

    Green and G

    D. Green and G. Sun,Effective Field Theory and In-In Correlators,2412.02739

  65. [65]

    R. K. Panda, S. Panda and A. Tinwala,Revisiting Lagrangian Formulation of Stochastic inflation, 2510.03171

  66. [66]

    C. O. Akyuz and R. Penco,Effective description of ajar systems with a U(1) symmetry,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) L011901, [2503.22840]

  67. [67]

    K¨ ading and M

    C. K¨ ading and M. Pitschmann,Density matrices in quantum field theory: Non-Markovianity, path integrals and master equations,2503.08567

  68. [68]

    Wang and Y

    Z. Wang and Y. Gong,Observational constraints on inflationary decoherence with polynomial attractor model,2503.03349

  69. [69]

    Cespedes, S

    S. Cespedes, S. de Alwis and F. Quevedo,Cosmology, Decoherence and the Second Law,2509.07077

  70. [70]

    Cespedes, Z

    S. Cespedes, Z. Qin and D.-G. Wang,λϕ 4˜as an Effective Theory in de Sitter,2510.25826

  71. [71]

    M. H. G. Lee and S. Melville,Propagator positivity bounds for cosmological correlators,2512.20706

  72. [72]

    Colas, Z

    T. Colas, Z. Qin and X. Tong,Open Effective Field Theory and the Physics of Cosmological Collider Signals,2512.07941

  73. [73]

    Burrage and C

    C. Burrage and C. K¨ ading,Fock state probability changes in open quantum systems,Eur. Phys. J. C 86(2026) 246, [2502.07673]

  74. [74]

    Boyanovsky, H

    D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, S. P. Kumar and R. D. Pisarski,Real time relaxation of condensates and kinetics in hot scalar QED: Landau damping,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 125009, [hep-ph/9802370]. – 64 –

  75. [75]

    Boyanovsky, H

    D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega and M. Simionato,Nonequilibrium quantum plasmas in scalar QED: Photon production, magnetic and Debye masses and conductivity,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 085007, [hep-ph/9909259]

  76. [76]

    Blaizot, D

    J.-P. Blaizot, D. De Boni, P. Faccioli and G. Garberoglio,Heavy quark bound states in a quark–gluon plasma: Dissociation and recombination,Nucl. Phys. A946(2016) 49–88, [1503.03857]

  77. [77]

    N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies, J. Pollack and G. N. Remmen,Cosmological Decoherence from Thermal Gravitons,JHEP08(2020) 065, [1911.10207]

  78. [78]

    DeLisle, J

    C. DeLisle, J. Wilson-Gerow and P. Stamp,Gravitational Decoherence, Asymptotic Quantization, and Entanglement Measures,1905.05333

  79. [79]

    T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani and J. Virrueta,An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography,JHEP01(2022) 145, [2108.03244]

  80. [80]

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium,JHEP03 (2025) 138, [2412.12299]

Showing first 80 references.