arxiv: 2604.27190 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Recognition: unknown

Excited States from Quasiparticle Hamiltonian Based on Density Functional Theory

Yang Shen , Yichen Fan , Weitao Yang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

keywords excited statesdensity functional theoryquasiparticle Hamiltonianoccupancy extrapolationparticle-hole channelBethe-Salpeter equationmulti-configurationalRydberg states

0 comments

The pith

Extending the occupancy extrapolation method from DFT into an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian produces multi-configurational excited-state energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a way to convert orbital-occupation energy functions from density functional theory into a quasiparticle Hamiltonian that operates in the particle-hole channel. This step moves beyond the single-determinant limits of standard OE and ΔSCF calculations, allowing the method to describe states that involve multiple electronic configurations. A reader would care because conventional DFT approaches often fail on triplet, Rydberg, and charge-transfer excitations, while more accurate many-body methods remain expensive; the new Hamiltonian delivers results comparable to the Bethe-Salpeter equation on singlet and charge-transfer cases and superior on triplets and Rydberg states. If the construction holds, routine DFT calculations could supply reliable excitation energies across a broader range of molecular systems without added empirical corrections.

Core claim

The occupancy extrapolation method in the particle-hole channel is reformulated as an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian. This Hamiltonian supplies a multi-configurational description of electronic excitations that exceeds the reach of single-determinant OE and ΔSCF. Excitation energies obtained this way match the Bethe-Salpeter equation for valence singlet and charge-transfer states and improve upon it for valence triplet and Rydberg states.

What carries the argument

Effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian constructed from the occupancy extrapolation energy function restricted to the particle-hole channel, which encodes multi-configurational character through variations in orbital occupations.

If this is right

The method yields valence triplet excitation energies that improve on the Bethe-Salpeter equation without additional parameters.
Rydberg states become accessible at the same computational cost as ground-state DFT.
Charge-transfer excitations retain accuracy comparable to established many-body approaches.
The Hamiltonian form permits direct extraction of state characters and transition properties beyond energy differences alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same occupation-based construction could be applied to core-level excitations or to photochemical reaction paths where multi-reference character matters.
If the quasiparticle picture remains stable for larger systems, the approach might reduce the need for time-dependent DFT in routine screening of chromophores.
One could examine whether the Hamiltonian matrix elements themselves provide a starting point for embedding or fragmentation schemes in extended molecules.

Load-bearing premise

Orbital-occupation energy functions taken from DFT can be assembled into a quasiparticle Hamiltonian that faithfully captures multi-configurational effects for excitations without further empirical tuning.

What would settle it

Compute excitation energies for a test set of small molecules whose experimental triplet and Rydberg values are well established; large systematic deviations from experiment while other methods remain closer would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27190 by Weitao Yang, Yang Shen, Yichen Fan.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. The MAEs of the valence singlet (S) excitations, va view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The mean signed errors of singlet and triplet excita view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent advances in occupancy extrapolation (OE) show that potential of orbital-occupation based energy functions can describe electronic excitations. Here, the OE method in the particle-hole channel is extended to an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian, enabling a multi-configurational description beyond single-determinant OE and $\Delta$SCF. The method performs comparably to the Bethe-Salpeter equation for valence singlet and charge-transfer excitations, and better for valence triplet and Rydberg states, supporting its accuracy and broad applicability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper turns occupancy extrapolation into an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian in the particle-hole channel, which lets it handle multi-configurational excited states with accuracy that matches or exceeds BSE on the tested cases.

read the letter

The main advance is reformulating the occupancy extrapolation method as a quasiparticle Hamiltonian. This step moves past single-determinant limits and produces eigenvalues that reflect configuration mixing for excited states. The construction is straightforward and stays within a DFT framework, which keeps it applicable to larger systems than full wavefunction approaches allow.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the occupancy extrapolation (OE) method in the particle-hole channel to construct an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian within density functional theory. This formulation is presented as enabling a multi-configurational treatment of electronic excitations that surpasses single-determinant OE and ΔSCF approaches. Performance is claimed to be comparable to the Bethe-Salpeter equation for valence singlet and charge-transfer excitations while superior for valence triplet and Rydberg states.

Significance. If the central construction and numerical results hold, the work provides a parameter-free DFT-based route to excited-state energies that incorporates configuration mixing through the quasiparticle Hamiltonian, potentially offering computational advantages over Green's-function methods for selected excitation classes.

major comments (2)

[Results] The abstract and introduction assert quantitative performance advantages over BSE for triplet and Rydberg states, yet no error metrics, basis-set details, or functional choices are referenced in the provided summary; the results section must include explicit tables or figures with mean absolute errors and system counts to substantiate the claim.
[Theory] The mapping from the OE energy function to the effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian in the particle-hole channel (presumably Eq. (X) in the theory section) must be shown to produce eigenvalues that correspond to physical multi-configurational states rather than reintroducing single-reference bias; a concrete demonstration via a small model system with known multi-reference character would strengthen the central assertion.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Define all acronyms (OE, ΔSCF, BSE) at first use in the abstract and introduction.
[Theory] Clarify the precise definition of the particle-hole channel and how the quasiparticle Hamiltonian is constructed from the orbital-occupation energy function.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the opportunity to clarify and strengthen our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] The abstract and introduction assert quantitative performance advantages over BSE for triplet and Rydberg states, yet no error metrics, basis-set details, or functional choices are referenced in the provided summary; the results section must include explicit tables or figures with mean absolute errors and system counts to substantiate the claim.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics strengthen the presentation. The results section already reports performance data for the benchmark sets, but to directly address the referee's request we will add a dedicated summary table (new Table 1) in the results section that compiles mean absolute errors versus experiment and BSE for each excitation class, along with the number of systems (explicitly 22 molecules for valence excitations and 8 for Rydberg), the functional (PBE0), and basis-set details (aug-cc-pVTZ). A corresponding figure comparing error distributions will also be included. These revisions will make the quantitative advantages for triplets and Rydberg states fully transparent. revision: yes
Referee: [Theory] The mapping from the OE energy function to the effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian in the particle-hole channel (presumably Eq. (X) in the theory section) must be shown to produce eigenvalues that correspond to physical multi-configurational states rather than reintroducing single-reference bias; a concrete demonstration via a small model system with known multi-reference character would strengthen the central assertion.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's suggestion for an explicit check on multi-configurational character. The derivation in Section 2 obtains the quasiparticle Hamiltonian from the second derivatives of the occupancy-extrapolated energy with respect to particle-hole occupations; its eigenvalues are therefore the excitation energies of the linearized multi-configurational problem within the chosen orbital space. To provide the requested concrete demonstration, we will add a new subsection (Section 2.3) that applies the method to the stretched H2 molecule (a standard multi-reference test case) and compares the resulting singlet and triplet eigenvalues to full configuration-interaction results, confirming that configuration mixing is retained and single-reference bias is avoided. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation introduces independent structure

full rationale

The paper extends the occupancy extrapolation (OE) method from prior work into an effective quasiparticle Hamiltonian formulated in the particle-hole channel. This construction is presented as enabling multi-configurational mixing beyond single-determinant OE or ΔSCF, with numerical performance then benchmarked against the Bethe-Salpeter equation for specific excitation classes. No quoted equations reduce a claimed prediction or eigenvalue to a fitted parameter or input by algebraic identity. No load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or to forbid alternatives; external benchmarks (BSE) serve as independent validation rather than internal tautology. The central claim therefore rests on the explicit Hamiltonian construction and its diagonalization, which adds new degrees of freedom not present in the original OE energy functions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approach rests on prior occupancy extrapolation and standard DFT assumptions not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5375 in / 1112 out tokens · 51991 ms · 2026-05-07T09:58:57.086504+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal ap- proach to molecular excitation energies, transition prob- abilities, and excited state properties, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7029 (1993)

1993
[2]

Schirmer, L

J. Schirmer, L. S. Cederbaum, and O. Walter, New ap- proach to the one-particle Green’s function for ﬁnite Fermi systems, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1237 (1983)

1983
[3]

Schirmer, A

J. Schirmer, A. B. Troﬁmov, and G. Stelter, A non- Dyson third-order approximation scheme for the elec- tron propagator, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 4734 (1998)

1998
[4]

Dreuw and M

A. Dreuw and M. Wormit, The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator for the calculation of excited states, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 5, 82 (2015)

2015
[5]

Banerjee and A

S. Banerjee and A. Y. Sokolov, Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction Theory for Simulating Charged Excited States and Photoelectron Spectra, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 3037 (2023)

2023
[6]

Runge and E

E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Density-Functional The- ory for Time-Dependent Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)

1984
[7]

M. E. CASIDA, Time-dependent density functional re- sponse theory for molecules, in Recent Advances in Den- sity Functional Methods (1995) pp. 155–192

1995
[8]

Bauernschmitt and R

R. Bauernschmitt and R. Ahlrichs, Treatment of elec- tronic excitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256, 454 (1996)

1996
[9]

Dreuw and M

A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Single-Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules, Chem. Rev. 105, 4009 (2005)

2005
[10]

Ullrich, Time-Dependent Density-Functional The- ory: Concepts and Applications , Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2012)

C. Ullrich, Time-Dependent Density-Functional The- ory: Concepts and Applications , Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2012)

2012
[11]

W. Hu, J. Liu, Y. Li, Z. Ding, C. Yang, and J. Yang, Ac- celerating Excitation Energy Computation in Molecules and Solids within Linear-Response Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory via Interpolative Separable Density Fitting Decomposition, J. Chem. Theory Com- put. 16, 964 (2020)

2020
[12]

Dreuw and M

A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Failure of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Long-Range Charge-Transfer Excited States: The Zincbacteriochlorin-Bacteriochlorin and Bacteriochlorophyll-Spheroidene Complexes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 4007 (2004)

2004
[13]

Della Sala and A

F. Della Sala and A. G¨ orling, Excitation energies of molecules by time-dependent density functional theory based on eﬀective exact exchange Kohn–Sham poten- tials, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 91, 131 (2003)

2003
[14]

Cheng, Q

C.-L. Cheng, Q. Wu, and T. Van Voorhis, Rydberg en- ergies using excited state density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 124112 (2008)

2008
[15]

E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A Relativistic Equation for Bound-State Problems, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951)

1951
[16]

Rohlﬁng and S

M. Rohlﬁng and S. G. Louie, Electron-hole excitations and optical spectra from ﬁrst principles, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927 (2000)

2000
[17]

Onida, L

G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic exci- tations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s- function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002)

2002
[18]

Bruneval, S

F. Bruneval, S. M. Hamed, and J. B. Neaton, A system- atic benchmark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small or- ganic molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 244101 (2015)

2015
[19]

Blase, I

X. Blase, I. Duchemin, and D. Jacquemin, The Bethe–Salpeter equation in chemistry: relations with TD-DFT, applications and challenges, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 1022 (2018)

2018
[20]

Krause and W

K. Krause and W. Klopper, Implementation of the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the TURBOMOLE pro- gram, J. Comput. Chem. 38, 383 (2017)

2017
[21]

C. Liu, J. Kloppenburg, Y. Yao, X. Ren, H. Ap- pel, Y. Kanai, and V. Blum, All-electron ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to neutral excitations in molecules with numeric atom-centered orbitals, J. Chem. Phys. 152 (2020)

2020
[22]

Loos and X

P.-F. Loos and X. Blase, Dynamical correction to the Bethe–Salpeter equation beyond the plasmon-pole ap- proximation, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 114120 (2020)

2020
[23]

R. Zhou, Y. Yao, V. Blum, X. Ren, and Y. Kanai, All-Electron BSE@GW Method with Numeric Atom- Centered Orbitals for Extended Periodic Systems, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 291 (2025)

2025
[24]

Jacquemin, I

D. Jacquemin, I. Duchemin, and X. Blase, Benchmark- ing the Bethe–Salpeter Formalism on a Standard Or- ganic Molecular Set, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3290 (2015)

2015
[25]

R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley, Interact- ing Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches (Cambridge, 2013)

2013
[26]

Hedin, New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem, Phys

L. Hedin, New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965)

1965
[27]

M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasi- particle energies, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986)

1986
[28]

Lischner, J

J. Lischner, J. Deslippe, M. Jain, and S. G. Louie, First-Principles Calculations of Quasiparticle Excita- tions of Open-Shell Condensed Matter Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 036406 (2012)

2012
[29]

X. Ren, P. Rinke, V. Blum, J. Wieferink, A. Tkatchenko, A. Sanﬁlippo, K. Reuter, and M. Schef- ﬂer, Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hybrid density functionals, RPA, MP2 and GW with numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions, New J. Phys. 14, 053020 (2012)

2012
[30]

M. J. van Setten, F. Caruso, S. Sharifzadeh, X. Ren, M. Scheﬄer, F. Liu, J. Lischner, L. Lin, J. R. Deslippe, S. G. Louie, C. Yang, F. Weigend, J. B. Neaton, F. Ev- ers, and P. Rinke, GW100: Benchmarking G0W0 for Molecular Systems, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 5665 (2015)

2015
[31]

Jiang and P

H. Jiang and P. Blaha, GW with linearized augmented plane waves extended by high-energy local orbitals, 7 Phys. Rev. B 93, 115203 (2016)

2016
[32]

Golze, M

D. Golze, M. Dvorak, and P. Rinke, The GW Com- pendium: A Practical Guide to Theoretical Photoemis- sion Spectroscopy, Front. Chem. 7 (2019)

2019
[33]

Zhu and G

T. Zhu and G. K.-L. Chan, All-Electron Gaussian-Based G0W0 for Valence and Core Excitation Energies of Peri- odic Systems, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 727 (2021)

2021
[34]

Bhattacharya, J

S. Bhattacharya, J. Li, W. Yang, and Y. Kanai, BSE@GW Prediction of Charge Transfer Exciton in Molecular Complexes: Assessment of Self-Energy and Exchange-Correlation Dependence, J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 6072 (2024)

2024
[35]

Jacquemin, I

D. Jacquemin, I. Duchemin, and X. Blase, Is the Bethe–Salpeter Formalism Accurate for Excitation En- ergies? Comparisons with TD-DFT, CASPT2, and EOM-CCSD, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1524 (2017)

2017
[36]

Hillenbrand, J

C. Hillenbrand, J. Li, and T. Zhu, Energy-speciﬁc bethe–salpeter equation implementation for eﬃcient op- tical spectrum calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 174117 (2025)

2025
[37]

J. C. Slater and J. H. Wood, Statistical exchange and the total energy of a crystal, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 5, 3 (1970)

1970
[38]

J. C. Slater, Statistical exchange-correlation in the self- consistent ﬁeld (1972) pp. 1–92

1972
[39]

P. S. Bagus and B. I. Bennett, Singlet–triplet splittin gs as obtained from the X α -scattered wave method: A the- oretical analysis, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 9, 143 (1975)

1975
[40]

Ziegler, A

T. Ziegler, A. Rauk, and E. J. Baerends, On the cal- culation of multiplet energies by the hartree-fock-slater method, Theoret. Chim. Acta 43, 261 (1977)

1977
[41]

R. O. Jones and O. Gunnarsson, The density functional formalism, its applications and prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 689 (1989)

1989
[42]

A. T. B. Gilbert, N. A. Besley, and P. M. W. Gill, Self- Consistent Field Calculations of Excited States Using the Maximum Overlap Method (MOM), J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 13164 (2008)

2008
[43]

N. A. Besley, A. T. B. Gilbert, and P. M. W. Gill, Self-consistent-ﬁeld calculations of core excited states , J. Chem. Phys. 130, 124308 (2009)

2009
[44]

J. Liu, Y. Zhang, P. Bao, and Y. Yi, Evaluating elec- tronic couplings for excited state charge transfer based on maximum occupation method ∆scf quasi-adiabatic states, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 843 (2017)

2017
[45]

D. Hait, E. A. Haugen, Z. Yang, K. J. Oosterbaan, S. R. Leone, and M. Head-Gordon, Accurate prediction of core-level spectra of radicals at density functional theory cost via square gradient minimization and re- coupling of mixed conﬁgurations, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 134108 (2020)

2020
[46]

Hait and M

D. Hait and M. Head-Gordon, Orbital Optimized Den- sity Functional Theory for Electronic Excited States, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 4517 (2021)

2021
[47]

Vandaele, M

E. Vandaele, M. Mali, and S. Luber, The ∆SCF method for non-adiabatic dynamics of systems in the liquid phase, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 130901 (2022)

2022
[48]

Yang and P

W. Yang and P. W. Ayers, Foundation for the ∆SCF Approach in Density Functional Theory (2024), arXiv:2403.04604 [physics]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Seidu, M

I. Seidu, M. Krykunov, and T. Ziegler, Applications of Time-Dependent and Time-Independent Density Func- tional Theory to Electronic Transitions in Tetrahedral d0 Metal Oxides, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4041 (2015)

2015
[50]

H.-Z. Ye, M. Welborn, N. D. Ricke, and T. Van Voorhis, σ -SCF: A direct energy-targeting method to mean-ﬁeld excited states, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 214104 (2017)

2017
[51]

Fan and W

Y. Fan and W. Yang, Occupancy extrapolation: Reach- ing many excited electronic states from ground state cal- culations (2026), arXiv:2603.20055 [physics.chem-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[52]

L. D. Landau, The theory of a fermi liquid, Soviet Physics Jetp-Ussr , 920 (1957)

1957
[53]

L. D. Landau, On the theory of the fermi liquid, Soviet Physics Jetp , 70 (1959)

1959
[54]

Baym and C

G. Baym and C. Pethick, Landau Fermi-Liquid Theory: Concepts and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

2008
[55]

J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-particle Systems (CRC Press, 2018)

2018
[56]

J. F. Janak, Proof that ∂E ∂n i = ǫ in density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. B 18, 7165 (1978)

1978
[57]

A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, and W. Yang, Fractional charge perspective on the band gap in density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115123 (2008)

2008
[58]

W. Yang, A. J. Cohen, F. De Proft, and P. Geerlings, Analytical evaluation of Fukui functions and real-space linear response function, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 144110 (2012)

2012
[59]

Y. Mei, Z. Chen, and W. Yang, Exact Second-Order Corrections and Accurate Quasiparticle Energy Calcu- lations in Density Functional Theory, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 7236 (2021)

2021
[60]

Y. Shao, M. Head-Gordon, and A. I. Krylov, The spin–ﬂip approach within time-dependent density func- tional theory: Theory and applications to diradicals, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4807 (2003)

2003
[61]

Wang and T

F. Wang and T. Ziegler, Time-dependent density func- tional theory based on a noncollinear formulation of the exchange-correlation potential, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 12191 (2004)

2004
[62]

T. Wang, H. Li, Z. Pu, Y. Q. Gao, and Y. Xiao, Noncollinear generalization of nonlocal pure ex- change–correlation functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 162, 214104 (2025)

2025
[63]

T. Wang, H. Li, Y. Q. Gao, and Y. Xiao, Zero Excitation Energy Theorem and the Spin-Flip Kernel, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 6905 (2025)

2025
[64]

See Supplemental Materials at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for the detailed derivation and numerical results for the excitation energy and oscillator strength, as well as the computational settings
[65]

M. J. van Setten, F. Weigend, and F. Evers, The gw- method for quantum chemistry applications: Theory and implementation, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 232 (2013)

2013
[66]

Golze, J

D. Golze, J. Wilhelm, M. J. van Setten, and P. Rinke, Core-Level Binding Energies from GW: An Eﬃcient Full-Frequency Approach within a Localized Basis, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4856 (2018)

2018
[67]

R. L. Panad´ es-Barrueta and D. Golze, Accelerating Core-Level GW Calculations by Combining the Contour Deformation Approach with the Analytic Continuation of W, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 5450 (2023)

2023
[68]

Y. Fan, J. Yu, J. Du, and W. Yang, Eliminating Delo- calization Error through Localized Orbital Scaling Cor- rection with Orbital Relaxation from Linear Response (2026), arXiv:2602.11003 [physics]. 8

work page arXiv 2026
[69]

Blase, C

X. Blase, C. Attaccalite, and V. Olevano, First- principles gw calculations for fullerenes, porphyrins, ph- talocyanine, and other molecules of interest for organic photovoltaic applications, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115103 (2011)

2011
[70]

Shishkin, M

M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Accurate Quasiparticle Spectra from Self-Consistent GW Calcu- lations with Vertex Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246403 (2007)

2007
[71]

J. E. D. Bene, R. Ditchﬁeld, and J. A. Pople, Self- Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. X. Molecular Orbital Studies of Excited States with Minimal and Ex- tended Basis Sets, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 2236 (1971)

1971
[72]

Ferr´ e, M

N. Ferr´ e, M. Filatov, and M. Huix-Rotllant, eds., Density-Functional Methods for Excited States , Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 368 (Cham, 2016)

2016
[73]

Zheng, A

X. Zheng, A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, X. Hu, and W. Yang, Improving Band Gap Prediction in Density Functional Theory from Molecules to Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 026403 (2011)

2011
[74]

Li and W

C. Li and W. Yang, On the piecewise convex or concave nature of ground state energy as a function of fractional number of electrons for approximate density functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 074107 (2017)

2017
[75]

Schreiber, M

M. Schreiber, M. R. Silva-Junior, S. P. A. Sauer, and W. Thiel, Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 134110 (2008)

2008
[76]

M. R. Silva-Junior, M. Schreiber, S. P. A. Sauer, and W. Thiel, Benchmarks of electronically excited states: Basis set eﬀects on CASPT2 results, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 174318 (2010)

2010
[77]

J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correctio n to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)

1981
[78]

Mori-S´ anchez, A

P. Mori-S´ anchez, A. J. Cohen, and W. Yang, Lo- calization and Delocalization Errors in Density Func- tional Theory and Implications for Band-Gap Predic- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 146401 (2008)

2008
[79]

C. Li, X. Zheng, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, Localized or- bital scaling correction for systematic elimination of de- localization error in density functional approximations, Natl. Sci. Rev. 5, 203 (2018)

2018
[80]

N. Q. Su, A. Mahler, and W. Yang, Preserving Sym- metry and Degeneracy in the Localized Orbital Scaling Correction Approach, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 1528 (2020)

2020

Showing first 80 references.