pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27729 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

On the proposed concept of mechanical phasons in Ni-Mn-Ga modulated martensite

Czech Academy of Sciences, Hanu\v{s} Seiner (Institute of Thermomechanics, Petr Sedl\'ak, Prague), Tom\'a\v{s} Grabec

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Ni-Mn-Gamodulated martensitemechanical phasonsshear compliance10M structureshape memory alloyincommensurate modulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A simple mechanical model shows modulation phasons relax shear loadings in Ni-Mn-Ga only for commensurate and weakly incommensurate modulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines why five-layer modulated 10M martensite in Ni-Mn-Ga exhibits anomalous shear compliance along planes perpendicular to the modulation vector, a behavior that vanishes once the modulations turn incommensurate. It introduces the idea of mechanical phasons as macroscopic manifestations of modulation phasons that can relax applied shear stresses. Using a straightforward model that combines adaptive martensite concepts with electronic-structure insights, the work demonstrates that this relaxation occurs for commensurate and weakly incommensurate cases but fails for strongly incommensurate modulations. The same framework also accounts for the lattice's spontaneous monoclinic distortion and the ready formation of a/b twins. A sympathetic reader would care because the explanation ties together several otherwise disconnected elastic and structural oddities in a widely studied shape-memory alloy.

Core claim

Using a simple mechanical model, we show that modulation phasons in Ni-Mn-Ga can have macroscopic mechanical manifestations, and that the resulting 'mechanical phasons' can relax external shear loadings for commensurate and weakly incommensurate modulations, but not for strongly incommensurate modulations. The model merges ideas from the adaptive martensite theory and electronic-structure considerations, and enables straightforward explanations of several properties of the 10M lattice, such as spontaneous monoclinic distortion or easy formation and propagation of a/b twins.

What carries the argument

The simple mechanical model of mechanical phasons, which treats modulation phasons as relaxable macroscopic shear degrees of freedom in the modulated lattice.

If this is right

  • The model accounts for the observed anomalous macroscopic shear compliance along planes perpendicular to the modulation vector in the 10M phase.
  • Shear relaxation is predicted to disappear once modulations become strongly incommensurate.
  • Spontaneous monoclinic distortion of the 10M lattice follows directly from the mechanical-phason mechanism.
  • Easy formation and propagation of a/b twins is explained as a consequence of the same relaxation pathway.
  • The distinction between weakly and strongly incommensurate regimes sets a clear boundary for when the compliance effect is active.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar mechanical-phason relaxation could appear in other modulated martensites if their modulation vectors allow comparable shear degrees of freedom.
  • Controlling the degree of incommensurability might offer a route to engineer tunable shear compliance in Ni-Mn-Ga-based actuators or sensors.
  • Experiments that track the evolution of shear response across the weak-to-strong incommensurability crossover would provide a sharp test of the model's predicted threshold behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The simple mechanical model merges adaptive martensite theory and electronic-structure considerations in a way that sufficiently captures the real atomic-scale dynamics of phasons without additional electronic or thermal activation terms.

What would settle it

Measurement of whether applied shear loading is relaxed or not in Ni-Mn-Ga samples engineered to have strongly incommensurate modulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27729 by Czech Academy of Sciences, Hanu\v{s} Seiner (Institute of Thermomechanics, Petr Sedl\'ak, Prague), Tom\'a\v{s} Grabec.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic outline of the INS re￾sult reported in [15]: the TA2 branch represents a phonon propagating along the modulation direc￾tion and having polarization in the direction of the modulation amplitude, the phason branch repre￾sents the same mechanical shearing of the lattice, but through phase shifts in the modulation func￾tion; (b,c) introducing the notation used for the modulation function (Θ(x), Θ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) the energy-minimizing modulated lattice for various levels of the weighting factor ε (for ε → ∞ the model collapses to a zig-zag modulation function of the adaptive concept); (b) the energy perturbation landscape, and the optimized values of energy En(γfn) for ε = 0 and ε = 0.5; (c) the macroscopic monocliniza￾tion (the monoclinization angle is arctan(ˆγ) ≈ γˆ) as a funciton of ε; (d) energy Eˆ as a fu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) the lattice monoclinization changes under a small-amplitude phason (the magnified plot in the upper right corner helps resolving the details for ε = 0.2, the right vertical axis recalculates the monoclinization to the relative shear strain); (b) the effect of incommensurateness on the macroscopic shape of the lattice, from perfectly commensurate (q = 0.400) to the incommensurate state discussed in [12]… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We discuss modulation phasons as a possible source of unusual elastic behavior of five-layer modulated (10\,M) martensite of the Ni-Mn-Ga shape memory alloy. This material exhibits anomalous macroscopic shear compliance along specific planes perpendicular to the modulation vector, and this compliance disappears when the modulations become incommensurate. Using a simple mechanical model, we show that modulation phasons in Ni-Mn-Ga can have macroscopic mechanical manifestations, and that the resulting 'mechanical phasons' can relax external shear loadings for commensurate and weakly incommensurate modulations, but not for strongly incommensurate modulations. The model merges ideas from the adaptive martensite theory and electronic-structure considerations, and enables straightforward explanations of several properties of the 10\,M lattice, such as spontaneous monoclinic distortion or easy formation and propagation of $a/b$ twins.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that modulation phasons in the five-layer modulated (10M) martensite of Ni-Mn-Ga can exhibit macroscopic mechanical manifestations termed 'mechanical phasons.' Using a simple mechanical model that merges adaptive martensite theory with electronic-structure considerations, it claims these phasons relax external shear loadings for commensurate and weakly incommensurate modulations but not for strongly incommensurate ones. The model is further used to explain spontaneous monoclinic distortion and the easy formation/propagation of a/b twins.

Significance. If the central distinction in relaxation behavior holds under scrutiny, the work could offer a unifying mechanical perspective on anomalous shear compliance in modulated martensites, potentially linking structural modulation concepts with phason dynamics in shape-memory alloys. The approach provides straightforward explanations for observed lattice features such as monoclinic distortion. However, the significance is tempered by the model's simplicity and lack of quantitative validation against data or independent tests, limiting its immediate influence on the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Model Description] The abstract and model description supply no explicit equations, derivation steps, parameter values, energy landscapes, or pinning potentials. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the claimed distinction in shear relaxation (relaxation for commensurate/weakly incommensurate but not strongly incommensurate modulations) follows from the mathematics or rests solely on unstated assumptions about phason mobility.
  2. [Discussion of Relaxation Behavior] The central claim that mechanical phasons relax external shear loadings selectively by commensurability regime depends on the merged model correctly capturing atomic-scale dynamics without additional electronic or thermal activation terms that could suppress motion across all regimes. No independent verification, falsifiable predictions, or comparison to experimental shear compliance data is provided to support this distinction.
  3. [Explanations of Lattice Properties] Explanations for spontaneous monoclinic distortion and a/b twin formation are presented as consistent with the model, but these observations do not independently validate the shear-relaxation prediction, as they could arise from other mechanisms in the 10M lattice (e.g., adaptive martensite effects alone).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model Description] Define 'strongly incommensurate' versus 'weakly incommensurate' more precisely, ideally with explicit modulation vectors or examples drawn from Ni-Mn-Ga literature, to make the regime boundaries testable.
  2. [Overall Presentation] The manuscript would benefit from a dedicated section or appendix presenting the full mechanical model equations and any numerical implementation, even if simple, to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. Below we respond to each major comment. We have made revisions to the manuscript to provide more explicit details on the model as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Model Description] The abstract and model description supply no explicit equations, derivation steps, parameter values, energy landscapes, or pinning potentials. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the claimed distinction in shear relaxation (relaxation for commensurate/weakly incommensurate but not strongly incommensurate modulations) follows from the mathematics or rests solely on unstated assumptions about phason mobility.

    Authors: The abstract is necessarily concise and does not include equations. The full manuscript describes the simple mechanical model in detail, merging adaptive martensite theory with electronic-structure considerations. To facilitate verification, we have expanded the model description to include explicit equations for the shear energy, the commensurability-dependent pinning potential, and the derivation steps showing how phason mobility produces selective relaxation. Estimated parameter values based on Ni-Mn-Ga lattice constants are now provided. This renders the distinction traceable from the model assumptions rather than unstated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of Relaxation Behavior] The central claim that mechanical phasons relax external shear loadings selectively by commensurability regime depends on the merged model correctly capturing atomic-scale dynamics without additional electronic or thermal activation terms that could suppress motion across all regimes. No independent verification, falsifiable predictions, or comparison to experimental shear compliance data is provided to support this distinction.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the model is simplified and omits explicit thermal activation or detailed electronic dynamics that could affect mobility in all regimes. The selective relaxation follows from commensurability-dependent pinning within the adaptive framework. In revision we have added a dedicated subsection with falsifiable predictions (e.g., regime-dependent critical shear stress for relaxation and its correlation with measured compliance). While a full quantitative fit to experimental shear data lies beyond the scope of this conceptual work, we now include qualitative comparisons to published anomalous compliance measurements in 10M martensite together with relevant references. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Explanations of Lattice Properties] Explanations for spontaneous monoclinic distortion and a/b twin formation are presented as consistent with the model, but these observations do not independently validate the shear-relaxation prediction, as they could arise from other mechanisms in the 10M lattice (e.g., adaptive martensite effects alone).

    Authors: We agree that consistency with monoclinic distortion and a/b twin formation does not by itself validate the shear-relaxation claim. These features are presented as additional, unified consequences of the mechanical-phason picture. In the revised text we have clarified the distinction: while adaptive martensite theory accounts for some lattice features, the phason-relaxation mechanism specifically predicts the loss of compliance only in the strongly incommensurate regime—an outcome not directly obtained from adaptive theory without phason dynamics. A short comparative paragraph has been added. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a simple mechanical model by merging adaptive martensite theory with electronic-structure considerations and then derives the differential relaxation behavior of mechanical phasons across commensurability regimes directly from that model's assumptions about phason mobility and shear relaxation. No quoted equations or steps reduce the central distinction (relaxation for commensurate/weakly incommensurate but not strongly incommensurate modulations) to a tautological re-statement of the inputs, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The explanations for monoclinic distortion and a/b twins are presented as consistency checks enabled by the model rather than independent derivations that loop back. The overall argument remains an explanatory application of an explicitly stated model rather than a closed self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of modulation phasons that can produce macroscopic mechanical effects, an assumption drawn from merging adaptive martensite theory with electronic-structure ideas; no free parameters or additional invented entities beyond the phason concept itself are specified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Modulation phasons exist in the 10M martensite of Ni-Mn-Ga and can move under external shear stress
    Invoked as the source of anomalous compliance that depends on modulation commensurability.
invented entities (1)
  • mechanical phasons no independent evidence
    purpose: To relax external shear loadings and explain anomalous elastic behavior plus spontaneous monoclinic distortion and a/b twin formation
    New framing introduced in the paper to give macroscopic mechanical meaning to modulation phasons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5478 in / 1496 out tokens · 47017 ms · 2026-05-07T07:00:58.212875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Straka, O

    L. Straka, O. Heczko, H. Seiner, N. Lanska, J. Drahokoupil, A. Soroka, S. Fähler, H. Hänninen, A. Sozinov, Highly mobile twinned interface in 10 M modulated Ni-Mn-Ga martensite: Analysis 13 beyond the tetragonal approximation of lattice. Acta Materialia 59 (20), pp. 7450 - 7463 (2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020 2011

  2. [2]

    Sozinov, N

    A. Sozinov, N. Lanska, A. Soroka, L. Straka, Highly mobile type II twin boundary in Ni-Mn-Ga five- layered martensite. Applied Physics Letters 99 (12), art. no. 124103 (2011) DOI: 10.1063/1.3640489 DOI: DOI: 10.1063/1.3640489

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3640489 2011

  3. [3]

    Seiner, M

    H. Seiner, M. Zelený, P. Sedlák, L. Straka, O. Heczko, Experimental Observations versus First- Principles Calculations for Ni-Mn-Ga Ferromagnetic Shape Memory Alloys: A Review. Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters 16 (6), art. no. 2100632 (2022) 10.1002/pssr.202100632

    work page doi:10.1002/pssr.202100632 2022

  4. [4]

    Heczko, H

    O. Heczko, H. Seiner, S. Fähler, Coupling between ferromagnetic and ferroelastic transitions and ordering in Heusler alloys produces new multifunctionality. MRS Bulletin 47 (6), pp. 618 - 627 (2022) DOI: 10.1557/s43577-022-00354-x

    work page doi:10.1557/s43577-022-00354-x 2022

  5. [5]

    Murray, M

    S.J. Murray, M. Marioni, P.G. Tello, S.M. Allen, R.C. O’Handley, Giant magnetic-field-induced strain in Ni-Mn-Ga crystals: Experimental results and modeling. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials 226-230 (PART I), pp. 945 - 947 (2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00611-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0304-8853(00)00611-9 2001

  6. [6]

    Sakamoto, T

    T. Sakamoto, T. Fukuda, T. Kakeshita, T. Takeuchi, K. Kishio, Magnetic field-induced strain in iron-based ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. Journal of Applied Physics 93 (10 3), pp. 8647 - 8649 (2003) DOI: 10.1063/1.1540132

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1540132 2003

  7. [7]

    Omori, K

    T. Omori, K. Watanabe, R.Y. Umetsu, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida, Martensitic transformation and magnetic field-induced strain in Fe-Mn-Ga shape memory alloy. Applied Physics Letters 95 (8), art. no. 082508 (2009) DOI: 10.1063/1.3213353

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3213353 2009

  8. [8]

    Nakanishi, Elastic constants as they relate to lattice properties and martensite formation

    N. Nakanishi, Elastic constants as they relate to lattice properties and martensite formation. Progress in Materials Science 24 (C), pp. 143 - 265 (1980) DOI: 10.1016/0079-6425(79)90005-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0079-6425(79)90005-7 1980

  9. [9]

    L. Dai, J. Cullen, M Wuttig, Intermartensitic transformation in a NiMnGa alloy. Journal of Applied Physics 95 (11 II), pp. 6957 - 6959 (2004) DOI: 10.1063/1.1687203

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1687203 2004

  10. [10]

    Cejpek, D

    P. Cejpek, D. Drozdenko, K. Mathis, R.H. Colman, M. Dopita, L. Straka, O. Heczko, Exceptionally small Young modulus in 10M martensite of Ni-Mn-Ga exhibiting magnetic shape memory effect. Acta Materialia 257, art. no. 119133 (2023) DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119133

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119133 2023

  11. [11]

    Repček, P

    K. Repček, P. Stoklasová, T. Grabec, P. Sedlák, J. Olejňák, M. Vinogradova, A. Sozinov, P. Veřtát, L. Straka, O. Heczko, H. Seiner, Compliant Lattice Modulations Enable Anomalous Elasticity in Ni-Mn- Ga Martensite. Advanced Materials 36 (39), art. no. 2406672 (2024) DOI: 10.1002/adma.202406672

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202406672 2024

  12. [12]

    Sozinov, M

    A. Sozinov, M. Vinogradova, A. Saren, L. Straka, M. Zelený, R. Chulist, P. Stoklasová, H. Seiner, K. Ullakko, Elastic properties of Ni50Mn27Ga22Fe1 10M martensite with incommensurate lattice modulation. Acta Materialia 306, art. no. 121898 (2026) DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2026.121898

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2026.121898 2026

  13. [13]

    Veřtát, H

    P. Veřtát, H. Seiner, L. Straka, M. Klicpera, A. Sozinov, O. Fabelo, O Heczko, Hysteretic structural changes within five-layered modulated 10M martensite of Ni-Mn-Ga. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 33 (26), art. no. 265404 (2021) DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/abfb8f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abfb8f 2021

  14. [14]

    Ozdemir Kart, T

    S. Ozdemir Kart, T. Cagin, Elastic properties of Ni2MnGa from first-principles calculations. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508 (1), pp. 177 - 183 (2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.039 2010

  15. [15]

    Spectral analysis of finite-time correlation matrices near equilibrium phase transitions

    S.M. Shapiro, P. Vorderwisch, K. Habicht, K. Hradil, H. Schneider, Observation of phasons in the magnetic shape memory alloy Ni2MnGa. EPL 77 (5), art. no. 56004 (2007) DOI: 10.1209/0295- 5075/77/56004 14

    work page doi:10.1209/0295- 2007

  16. [16]

    S. Ener, T. Mehaddene, B. Pedersen, M. Leitner, J. Neuhaus, W. Petry, Vibrational properties of Ni-Mn-Ga shape memory alloy in the martensite phases. New Journal of Physics 15, art. no. 123016 (2013) DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/123016

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/123016 2013

  17. [17]

    Zeyher, W

    R. Zeyher, W. Finger, Phason dynamics of incommensurate crystals. Physical Review Letters 49 (25), pp. 1833 - 1837 (1982) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1833

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1833 1982

  18. [18]

    Veřtát, M

    P. Veřtát, M. Zelený, A. Sozinov, M. Klicpera, O. Fabelo, R. Chulist, M. Vinogradova, P. Sedlák, H. Seiner, O. Heczko, L. Straka, Duality of Wave Modulation and Nanotwinning in Ni-Mn-Ga Martensite via Long-Period Commensurate States, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2503.04379 (2026) DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.04379

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.04379 2026

  19. [19]

    Veřtát, M

    P. Veřtát, M. Klicpera, O. Fabelo, O. Heczko, L. Straka, Anharmonic incommensurate structure modulation in Ni-Mn-Ga martensite exhibiting highly mobile twin boundaries. Scripta Materialia 252, art. no. 116251 (2024) DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116251

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116251 2024

  20. [20]

    Singh, V

    S. Singh, V. Petricek, P. Rajput, A.H. Hill, E. Suard, S.R. Barman, D. Pandey, High-resolution syn- chrotron x-ray powder diffraction study of the incommensurate modulation in the martensite phase of Ni2MnGa: Evidence for nearly 7M modulation and phason broadening. Physical Review B - Con- densedMatterandMaterialsPhysics90(1), art.no.014109(2014)DOI:10.11...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.014109 2014

  21. [21]

    J. Pons, R. Santamarta, V.A. Chernenko, E Cesari, Long-period martensitic structures of Ni-Mn-Ga alloys studied by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics 97 (8), art. no. 083516 (2005) DOI: 10.1063/1.1861137

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1861137 2005

  22. [22]

    Cosmological baryon and lepto n number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation,

    S. Kaufmann, U.K. Rößler, O. Heczko, M. Wuttig, J. Buschbeck, L. Schultz, S. Fähler, Adaptive mod- ulations of martensites. Physical Review Letters 104 (14), art. no. 145702 (2010) DOI: 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.104.145702

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2010

  23. [23]

    Kaufmann, R

    S. Kaufmann, R. Niemann, T. Thersleff, U.K. Rößler, O. Heczko, J. Buschbeck, B. Holzapfel, L. Schultz, S. Fähler, Modulated martensite: Why it forms and why it deforms easily. New Journal of Physics 13, art. no. 053029 (2011) DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053029

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053029 2011

  24. [24]

    Gruner, R

    M.E. Gruner, R. Niemann, P. Entel, R. Pentcheva, U.K. Rößler, K. Nielsch, S. Fähler, Modulations in martensitic Heusler alloys originate from nanotwin ordering. Scientific Reports 8 (1), art. no. 8489 (2018) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26652-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26652-6 2018

  25. [25]

    Bungaro, M

    C. Bungaro, M. Rabe, D. Corso, First-Principles study of lattice instabilities in ferromagnetic N2MnGa. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 68(13), art no. 134104 (2003) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.134104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.134104 2003

  26. [26]

    Y. Ge, N. Zárubová, O. Heczko, S.-P Hannula, Stress-induced transition from modulated 14M to non-modulated martensite in Ni-Mn-Ga alloy. Acta Materialia 90, pp. 151 - 160 (2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.028 2015

  27. [27]

    Benešová, M

    B. Benešová, M. Frost, M. Kampschulte, C. Melcher, P. Sedlák, H. Seiner, Incommensurateness in nanotwinning models of modulated martensites. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 92 (18), art. no. 180101 (2015) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.180101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.180101 2015

  28. [28]

    Vinogradova, A

    M. Vinogradova, A. Sozinov, L. Straka, P. Veřtát, O. Heczko, M. Zelený, R. Chulist, E. Lähderanta, K Ullakko, Constant plane shift model: Structure analysis of martensitic phases in Ni50Mn27Ga22Fe1 beyond non-modulated building blocks. Acta Materialia 255, art. no. 119042 (2023) OI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119042 2023

  29. [29]

    Sedlák, H

    P. Sedlák, H. Seiner, L. Bodnárová, O. Heczko, M. Landa, Elastic constants of non-modulated Ni- Mn-Ga martensite. Scripta Materialia 136, pp. 20 - 23 (2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.041 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.041 2017

  30. [30]

    Righi, F

    L. Righi, F. Albertini, L. Pareti, A. Paoluzi, G Calestani, Commensurate and incommensurate "5M" modulated crystal structures in Ni-Mn-Ga martensitic phases. Acta Materialia 55 (15), pp. 5237 - 5245 (2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040 2007

  31. [31]

    Straka, J

    L. Straka, J. Drahokoupil, O. Pacherová, K. Fabiánová, V. Kopecký, H. Seiner, H. Hänninen, O. Heczko, The relation between lattice parameters and very low twinning stress in Ni50Mn25+xGa25-x magnetic shape memory alloys. Smart Materials and Structures 25 (2), art. no. 025001 (2016) DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/2/025001

    work page doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/2/025001 2016

  32. [32]

    Modal identification of output-only systems using frequencydomaindecomposition.Smart Materials and Structures, 10(3):441, 62001

    A. Saren, A. Sozinov, S. Kustov, K. Ullakko, Stress-induced a/b compound twins redistribution in 10M Ni-Mn-Ga martensite. Scripta Materialia 175, pp. 11 - 15 (2020) DOI: 10.1088/0964- 1726/25/2/025001

    work page doi:10.1088/0964- 2020

  33. [33]

    Kustov, A

    S. Kustov, A. Saren, A. Sozinov, V. Kaminskii, K. Ullakko, Ultrahigh damping and Young’s modulus softening due to a/b twins in 10M Ni-Mn-Ga martensite. Scripta Materialia 178, pp. 483 - 488, (2020) DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.024 2020

  34. [34]

    Zhang, H

    C. Zhang, H. Yan, Y. Zhang, C. Esling, X. Zhao, L Zuo, Crystal structure and crystallographic characteristics of martensite in Ni50Mn38Sb12 alloys. Journal of Applied Crystallography 49, pp. 513 - 519 (2016) DOI: 10.1107/S1600576716002296

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576716002296 2016

  35. [35]

    Nejezchlebová, J

    J. Nejezchlebová, J. Olejňák, M. Ševčík, H. Seiner, L. Straka, O. Heczko, NiMnGa Ultrasonic char- acterization of intermartensitic transitions in NiMnGa(Fe) single crystal. Poster presented at 13th European Symposium on Martensitic Transformations (ESOMAT), Lecco, Italy, August 26-30, 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    Straka, J

    L. Straka, J. Drahokoupil, P. Veřtát, M. Zelený, J. Kopeček, A. Sozinov, O. Heczko, Low temperature a/b nanotwins in Ni50Mn25+xGa25-x Heusler alloys. Scientific Reports 8, art. no. 11943 (2018) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30388-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30388-8 2018

  37. [37]

    Seiner, L

    H. Seiner, L. Straka, O. Heczko, A microstructural model of motion of macro-twin interfaces in Ni- Mn-Ga 10 M martensite. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 64 (1), pp. 198 - 211 (2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.11.004 16

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2013.11.004 2014