pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27797 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black hole

Ikhtiyor Eshtursunov , Sanjar Shaymatov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords magnetic reconnectionfive-dimensional Kerr black holeenergy extractionsingle rotationtwo-rotation configurationBlandford-Znajek mechanismplasma magnetizationastrophysical phenomena
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic reconnection enables more efficient energy extraction from five-dimensional Kerr black holes in single-rotation setups.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies the magnetic reconnection mechanism to rapidly rotating five-dimensional Kerr black holes to study how energy can be extracted from their rotation. It finds that single-rotation black holes achieve higher extraction efficiency than two-rotation ones and can exceed the output of the standard Blandford-Znajek process. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to a potentially powerful way for black holes in higher-dimensional spacetimes to drive energetic astrophysical events. The results depend on the black hole spin, where reconnection occurs, how magnetized the plasma is, and the orientation of the magnetic field. If the findings hold, five-dimensional single-rotation black holes become attractive candidates for explaining high-energy cosmic sources.

Core claim

We employ the Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection mechanism to investigate energy extraction from a rapidly rotating five-dimensional Kerr black hole with single- and two-rotation configurations. We analyze the efficiency, phase-space structure of accelerated and decelerated plasma energies, and the extracted power as functions of the spin parameter, reconnection location, plasma magnetization, and magnetic field orientation. We show that MR significantly enhances energy extraction from a five-dimensional BH with a single rotation and that the extraction efficiency is higher in the single rotation configuration than in the two-rotation case. We also evaluate the extraction rate and compare

What carries the argument

The Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection mechanism applied within the five-dimensional Kerr spacetime, which accelerates plasma by releasing magnetic energy near the event horizon.

If this is right

  • The extraction efficiency is higher in the single-rotation configuration than in the two-rotation case.
  • The extracted power can exceed that of the Blandford-Znajek process in the single-rotation configuration.
  • Efficiency and power vary with spin parameter, reconnection location, plasma magnetization, and magnetic field orientation.
  • Five-dimensional Kerr black holes with single rotation are promising candidates for powering high-energy astrophysical phenomena.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If extra dimensions are present, single-rotation black holes may serve as more efficient energy sources than in four dimensions.
  • This could influence models of high-energy astrophysical sources in higher-dimensional theories.
  • Applying the mechanism to other higher-dimensional spacetimes might yield similar enhancements in energy extraction.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic reconnection process as formulated in four-dimensional spacetime applies directly to the five-dimensional Kerr black hole geometry and the surrounding plasma and magnetic fields without essential modifications.

What would settle it

Finding through numerical simulations or analytical calculations that the energy extraction rate from magnetic reconnection in five-dimensional Kerr black holes is lower than the Blandford-Znajek rate across the relevant parameter space would falsify the claim of significant improvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27797 by Ikhtiyor Eshtursunov, Sanjar Shaymatov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The relation between accelerated and decelerated view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The behavior of energies at infinity per enthalpy of accelerated and decelerated plasma against the orientation angle view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The areas of phase-space for the energies of accelerated ( view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The power extracted from five-dimensional Kerr BH by using MR is shown when rotation parameters maximally view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The efficiencies of energy extraction via the MR mechanism from a five-dimensional Kerr BH are plotted as a function view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The efficiency distribution of energy extraction via the MR mechanism from a five-dimensional Kerr BH is plotted view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. A comparison of two energy extraction mechanisms showing their extracted powers as a function of magnetization view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we employ the Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection (MR) mechanism to investigate energy extraction from a rapidly rotating five-dimensional Kerr black hole (BH) with single- and two-rotation configurations. We analyze the efficiency, phase-space structure of accelerated and decelerated plasma energies, and the extracted power as functions of the spin parameter, reconnection location, plasma magnetization, and magnetic field orientation. We show that MR significantly enhances energy extraction from a five-dimensional BH with a single rotation and that the extraction efficiency is higher in the single rotation configuration than in the two-rotation case. We also evaluate the extraction rate and compare it with the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) mechanism, showing that the extracted power can exceed that of the BZ process in the single-rotation configuration. Our analysis shows that MR can significantly improve energy extraction in five-dimensional Kerr BHs with a single rotation, making them promising candidates for powering high-energy astrophysical phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection (MR) mechanism to energy extraction from five-dimensional Kerr black holes with single- and two-rotation configurations. It computes efficiency, the phase-space structure of accelerated and decelerated plasma energies, and extracted power as functions of spin parameter, reconnection location, plasma magnetization, and magnetic-field orientation. The central claims are that MR significantly enhances extraction in the single-rotation case, that efficiency is higher for single rotation than for two rotations, and that the extracted power can exceed the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) power in the single-rotation configuration.

Significance. If the quantitative results survive scrutiny, the work would indicate that single-rotation five-dimensional Kerr black holes can be more efficient energy extractors via magnetic reconnection than either their two-rotation counterparts or the BZ process, thereby identifying a class of higher-dimensional spacetimes as plausible engines for high-energy astrophysical phenomena. The comparative study of rotation parameters in 5D supplies a concrete illustration of how dimensionality and the number of independent rotations affect extraction efficiency.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (reconnection formalism) and §4 (energy and power expressions): the manuscript inserts the five-dimensional Kerr metric components (g_tt, g_tφ, ergosphere radius) directly into the four-dimensional Comisso-Asenjo formulas for pre- and post-reconnection energies E_in/out, Lorentz factors, magnetization σ, and power P ∝ σ B² v_rec A. No re-derivation of the electromagnetic invariants F_μν F^μν, the stress-energy tensor, or the local reconnection rate v_rec is provided for the 5D manifold. Because the Maxwell tensor and the Killing vectors now involve an extra coordinate and a second rotation parameter, the phase-space boundaries and the numerical advantage claimed for single-rotation configurations may receive O(1) corrections that are not quantified.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (power comparison with BZ): the statement that MR power exceeds BZ power for single-rotation 5D Kerr relies on the same unsubstantiated substitution. Without an explicit 5D calculation of the reconnection rate and the extracted ΔE, the claimed superiority cannot be regarded as established.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction should state the numerical ranges explored for spin a, magnetization σ, and reconnection radius r_rec so that readers can assess the domain of the reported trends.
  2. [§2] Notation: clarify whether Greek indices run over 0–4 and whether the extra-dimensional coordinate is treated as ignorable; this affects the definition of conserved quantities along Killing vectors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate clarifications and caveats.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (reconnection formalism) and §4 (energy and power expressions): the manuscript inserts the five-dimensional Kerr metric components (g_tt, g_tφ, ergosphere radius) directly into the four-dimensional Comisso-Asenjo formulas for pre- and post-reconnection energies E_in/out, Lorentz factors, magnetization σ, and power P ∝ σ B² v_rec A. No re-derivation of the electromagnetic invariants F_μν F^μν, the stress-energy tensor, or the local reconnection rate v_rec is provided for the 5D manifold. Because the Maxwell tensor and the Killing vectors now involve an extra coordinate and a second rotation parameter, the phase-space boundaries and the numerical advantage claimed for single-rotation configurations may receive O(1) corrections that are not quantified.

    Authors: We agree that the original Comisso-Asenjo analysis was performed in four dimensions and that a complete re-derivation of the reconnection dynamics from the 5D Einstein-Maxwell equations would be desirable. In the present work we generalize the conserved energies E_in/out by contracting the four-velocity with the timelike and azimuthal Killing vectors of the 5D Kerr metric, using the explicit 5D line element to evaluate the normalization and the ergosphere boundary. The electromagnetic invariants are computed with the 5D metric for an asymptotically uniform magnetic field. However, the local reconnection rate v_rec is adopted from the 4D literature as an order-of-magnitude estimate. We will add a new paragraph in §3 that explicitly lists these assumptions, notes that O(1) corrections to the quantitative efficiencies and power ratios may arise from a full 5D MHD treatment, and states that the qualitative ordering between single- and double-rotation cases is driven by the metric components in the ergoregion, which are correctly incorporated. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (power comparison with BZ): the statement that MR power exceeds BZ power for single-rotation 5D Kerr relies on the same unsubstantiated substitution. Without an explicit 5D calculation of the reconnection rate and the extracted ΔE, the claimed superiority cannot be regarded as established.

    Authors: We accept that the comparison with the Blandford-Znajek process must be qualified. The BZ power is evaluated using the standard 5D expressions for horizon area and angular velocity available in the higher-dimensional literature. The MR power employs the same approximate v_rec and area scaling. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit statement that both mechanisms are treated at the same level of approximation, that a self-consistent 5D calculation of the reconnection rate is not performed, and that the claim of MR exceeding BZ holds only under the adopted approximations for the single-rotation case. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A complete first-principles derivation of the reconnection rate v_rec and the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor from the five-dimensional Maxwell equations and relativistic MHD.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies the established Comisso-Asenjo 4D reconnection formulas to the 5D Kerr metric by direct substitution of metric components (g_tt, g_tφ, ergosphere radius) into expressions for pre/post-reconnection energies E_in/out, Lorentz factors, and power P ∝ σ B² v_rec A. This constitutes a model application rather than a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations reduce by construction to their inputs; the efficiency and power comparisons to BZ emerge from the substituted 5D geometry under the stated assumptions. The derivation remains self-contained as an extension of prior external results, with no ansatz smuggling or renaming of known patterns presented as new unification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the direct transfer of the four-dimensional Comisso-Asenjo reconnection model to five-dimensional Kerr spacetime together with standard assumptions about stationary axisymmetric plasma and magnetic-field geometry; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Comisso-Asenjo magnetic reconnection mechanism applies directly to five-dimensional Kerr spacetime without modification
    The abstract states that the mechanism is employed to investigate the five-dimensional case.
  • domain assumption Plasma magnetization, magnetic-field orientation, and reconnection location can be treated as independent parameters in the five-dimensional geometry
    These quantities are listed as variables in the efficiency and power analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1427 out tokens · 70948 ms · 2026-05-07T07:50:32.132328+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collab- oration), Astrophys. J.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collab- oration), Astrophys. J.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    A. R. King, M. B. Davies, M. J. Ward, G. Fabbiano, and M. Elvis, Astrophys. J.552, L109 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0104333 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    B. M. Peterson,An Introduction to Active Galactic Nu- clei(1997)

    1997

  7. [7]

    Meszaros, Rept

    P. Meszaros, Rept. Prog. Phys.69, 2259 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605208

    work page arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    R. P. Fender, T. M. Belloni, and E. Gallo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.355, 1105 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409360 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    Auchettl, J

    K. Auchettl, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, As- trophys. J.838, 149 (2017), arXiv:1611.02291 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    The IceCube Collaboration and et al., Science361, eaat1378 (2018), arXiv:1807.08816 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Penrose, Riv

    R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cim.1, 252 (1969)

    1969

  12. [12]

    M. Bhat, S. Dhurandhar, and N. Dadhich, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy6, 85 (1985)

    1985

  13. [13]

    Parthasarathy, S

    S. Parthasarathy, S. M. Wagh, S. V. Dhurandhar, and N. Dadhich, Atrophys. J.307, 38 (1986)

    1986

  14. [14]

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.179, 433 (1977)

    1977

  15. [15]

    M. J. Rees, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.22, 471 (1984)

    1984

  16. [16]

    J. C. McKinney and R. Narayan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.375, 531 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607576 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    A. A. Abdujabbarov, B. J. Ahmedov, S. R. Shayma- tov, and A. S. Rakhmatov, Astrophys Space Sci334, 237 (2011), arXiv:1105.1910 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    S. V. Dhurandhar and N. Dadhich, Phys. Rev. D29, 2712 (1984)

    1984

  19. [19]

    S. V. Dhurandhar and N. Dadhich, Phys. Rev. D30, 1625 (1984)

    1984

  20. [20]

    S. M. Wagh, S. V. Dhurandhar, and N. Dadhich, Astro- phys. J.290, 12 (1985)

    1985

  21. [21]

    Tursunov and N

    A. Tursunov and N. Dadhich, Universe5, 125 (2019), arXiv:1905.05321 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Shaymatov, Phys

    S. Shaymatov, Phys. Rev. D110, 044042 (2024), arXiv:2402.02471 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Xamidov, S

    T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, and B. Ahme- dov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1300 (2024), arXiv:2407.19800 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Dadhich, A

    N. Dadhich, A. Tursunov, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchl´ ık, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478, L89 (2018), arXiv:1804.09679 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, and A. Tursunov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1015 (2024), arXiv:2404.06870 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Shaymatov, P

    S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, R. Becerril, U. Nucamendi, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D106, 024039 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Xamidov, P

    T. Xamidov, P. Sheoran, S. Shaymatov, and T. Zhu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 053 (2025), arXiv:2412.03885 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Koide and K

    S. Koide and K. Arai, Astrophys. J.682, 1124 (2008), arXiv:0805.0044 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Parfrey, A

    K. Parfrey, A. Philippov, and B. Cerutti, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 035101 (2019), arXiv:1810.03613 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani,Superradiance. New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Vol. 971 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    R. D. Blandford and D. G. Payne, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.199, 883 (1982)

    1982

  32. [32]

    A. P. Marscheret al., Nature452, 966 (2008)

    2008

  33. [33]

    The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays

    K. Kotera and A. V. Olinto, Annual Reviews49, 119 (2011), arXiv:1101.4256 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    G. E. Romero, (2008), arXiv:0805.2082 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Comisso and F

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, Phys. Rev. D103, 023014 (2021), arXiv:2012.00879 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Liu, Astrophys

    W. Liu, Astrophys. J.925, 149 (2022), arXiv:2204.07338 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Wei, H.-M

    S.-W. Wei, H.-M. Wang, Y.-P. Zhang, and Y.-X. Liu, JCAP2022, 050 (2022), arXiv:2201.12729 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Carleo, G

    A. Carleo, G. Lambiase, and L. Mastrototaro, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 776 (2022), arXiv:2206.12988 [gr-qc]. 10

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Khodadi, Phys

    M. Khodadi, Phys. Rev. D105, 023025 (2022), arXiv:2201.02765 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Wang, C.-Q

    C.-H. Wang, C.-Q. Pang, and S.-W. Wei, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124050 (2022), arXiv:2209.08837 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Khodadi, D

    M. Khodadi, D. F. Mota, and A. Sheykhi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2023, 034 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Shaymatov, M

    S. Shaymatov, M. Alloqulov, B. Ahmedov, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D110, 044005 (2024), arXiv:2307.03012 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Zhang, J

    S.-J. Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024, 042 (2024), arXiv:2405.16941 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    B. Chen, Y. Hou, J. Li, and Y. Shen, Phys. Rev. D110, 063003 (2024), arXiv:2405.11488 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Shen and H.-Y

    Y. Shen and H.-Y. YuChih, Phys. Rev. D111, 023003 (2025), arXiv:2412.03010 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    F. Long, S. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 26 (2025), arXiv:2409.11942 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Rodriguez, A

    S. Rodriguez, A. Sidler, L. Rodriguez, and L. R. Ram-Mohan, Phys. Dark Universe48, 101961 (2025), arXiv:2407.15347 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: Bumblebee gravity

    H.-Y. YuChih and Y. Shen, Phys. Rev. D112, 104016 (2025), arXiv:2510.23292 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Wang and X.-X

    K. Wang and X.-X. Zeng, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2025, 026 (2025), arXiv:2508.11934 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Zeng and K

    X.-X. Zeng and K. Wang, Phys. Rev. D112, 064032 (2025), arXiv:2507.21777 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Zeng and K

    X.-X. Zeng and K. Wang, Phys. Rev. D112, 064080 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Cheng, S

    Z. Cheng, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1130 (2025), arXiv:2507.11859 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Eshtursunov and S

    I. Eshtursunov and S. Shaymatov, (2026), arXiv:2603.17928 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)172, 304 (1986)

    1986

  55. [55]

    Chong, M

    Z.-W. Chong, M. Cvetiˇ c, H. L¨ u, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. D72, 041901 (2005), hep-th/0505112

    work page arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Nozawa and K.-I

    M. Nozawa and K.-I. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D71, 084028 (2005), hep-th/0502166

    work page arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Prabhu and N

    K. Prabhu and N. Dadhich, Phys. Rev. D81, 024011 (2010), arXiv:0902.3079 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Abdujabbarov, N

    A. Abdujabbarov, N. Dadhich, B. Ahmedov, and H. Eshkuvatov, Phys. Rev. D88, 084036 (2013), arXiv:1310.4494 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Dadhich and S

    N. Dadhich and S. Shaymatov, Phys. Dark Universe35, 100986 (2022), arXiv:2104.00427 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    J. An, J. Shan, H. Zhang, and S. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104007 (2018), arXiv:1711.04310 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, and B. Ahmedov, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 585 (2019), arXiv:1809.10457 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D101, 044028 (2020), arXiv:1908.07799 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Shaymatov, N

    S. Shaymatov, N. Dadhich, B. Ahmedov, and M. Jamil, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 481 (2020), arXiv:1908.01195 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Dadhich and S

    N. Dadhich and S. Shaymatov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D.31, 2150120 (2022)

    2022

  65. [65]

    Shaymatov and N

    S. Shaymatov and N. Dadhich, Phys. Dark Universe31, 100758 (2021), arXiv:2004.09242 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and M. M. Taylor- Robinson, Phys. Rev. D59, 064005 (1999), hep- th/9811056

    work page arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Black Hole Spin and the Radio Loud/Quiet Dichotomy of Active Galactic Nuclei

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Astrophys. J.711, 50 (2010), arXiv:0911.2228 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010