pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.28035 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

Claudio Bonanno , Claudio Bonati , Massimo D'Elia

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phhep-th
keywords QCDtheta dependencetopological susceptibilitylattice QCDstrong CP problemaxionchiral effective theorylarge-N QCD
0
0 comments X

The pith

QCD theta dependence follows from chiral effective theories, large-N arguments, semiclassical methods, and lattice simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This chapter introduces the theta term in the QCD action as the source of topological effects that explicitly violate CP symmetry except at specific values. It connects these effects to observable phenomena including the eta prime meson mass, the neutron electric dipole moment, the strong CP problem, and the axion mechanism proposed to solve it. Analytic predictions for the vacuum energy and topological susceptibility are surveyed from chiral perturbation theory at small quark masses, large-N expansions, and instanton-based semiclassical calculations, each with stated ranges of validity. Recent Monte Carlo results from lattice discretizations of QCD are presented to provide non-perturbative benchmarks, especially for the susceptibility at small theta. A reader cares because these quantities determine whether theta must be unnaturally small and shape experimental searches for axions.

Core claim

The theta dependence of the QCD vacuum energy is described by a set of analytic approaches whose regimes of validity are known, while lattice Monte Carlo simulations of the discretized theory supply direct numerical access to the topological susceptibility and its theta dependence.

What carries the argument

The topological susceptibility, obtained as the curvature of the vacuum free energy with respect to the theta angle at theta equals zero, which quantifies how the QCD vacuum responds to the topological charge term.

If this is right

  • The neutron electric dipole moment is directly proportional to theta, yielding the experimental upper bound of order 10 to the minus 10.
  • The eta prime mass arises from the topological susceptibility via the Witten-Veneziano relation in the large-N limit.
  • Axion potentials are fixed by the shape of the QCD vacuum energy as a function of theta, controlling axion mass and couplings.
  • Finite-temperature lattice studies of theta dependence can map changes across the QCD deconfinement transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice computations performed directly at finite theta could expose higher-order terms in the vacuum energy that are invisible at theta equals zero.
  • Precise values of the susceptibility and its derivatives supply input for axion dark-matter calculations that go beyond the simplest cosine potential.
  • Systematic comparison of lattice and analytic results may quantify the size of finite-volume and discretization effects still present in current simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The selected analytic predictions and numerical results are representative of the current literature and accurately reflect the state of the field without significant selection bias or omission of key recent developments.

What would settle it

A new lattice calculation of the topological susceptibility and its leading theta corrections at small but nonzero theta that deviates from the quadratic or quartic behavior predicted by chiral effective theory in the overlapping regime of validity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.28035 by Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, Massimo D'Elia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: extrapolation towards N → ∞ of χ/σ2 , with σ the string tension [87, 153, 157]. Best fit yields χ/σ2 = 0.02088(39) + 0.044(12)/N 2 + 0.293(83)/N 4 (source: Ref. [153]). Right: Extrapolation toward N → ∞ of b2 [147, 148] (source: Ref. [148]). Best fit according to b2 = b¯ 2/N 2 yields b2 = −0.193(10)/N 2 fixing the exponent c = 2 (dashed line). This result is stable within errors if the exponent is le… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: extrapolation towards the continuum limit of χ in 2 + 1 QCD with physical quark masses with gluonic and fermionic discretization of the topological charge (source: Ref. [164]). Right: chiral extrapolation of the continuum extrapolations of χ in 2 + 1 QCD obtained from a fermionic discretization (source: Ref. [165]). The x-axis reports the ratio of the degenerate light quark mass mℓ = mu = md with res… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of neutron EDM determinations from 2 + 1 lattice QCD [214–217] (square points), compared with the χPT result [21] (triangle point). The EDM is reported in units of 10−3 · θ e fm, with e the elementary electric charge. in turn requires very fine lattice spacings to keep T large. This exacerbates the topological freezing problem, and explains why most studies are limited to T ≲ 4Tc, while axion pheno… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison among the non-perturbative pure-glue and 2+1 QCD determinations of the sphaleron rate of [225, 226] with the new method [225] that addresses the resolution of the inverse problem, the non-perturbative pure-glue determination of [67] that avoided the reso￾lution of the inverse problem, and the semiclassical estimate of [66]. quantities, which also works for other kinetic coefficients. Let us intr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this chapter we provide a pedagogical introduction to the main theoretical aspects related to topology and $\theta$-dependence in Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD), and to their phenomenological relevance in the Standard Model ($\eta^\prime$ physics, neutron electric dipole moment) and beyond (strong CP problem and the axion solution). We then provide an overview of the main analytic predictions for $\theta$-dependence obtained using several different approaches (chiral effective theories, large-$N$ arguments, semiclassical methods) and their regimes of validity, as well as a selection of the most recent numerical results about QCD topology obtained via Monte Carlo simulations of the lattice-discretized theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review chapter provides a pedagogical introduction to topology and θ-dependence in QCD. It covers the strong-CP problem and axion physics, derives leading θ-dependence from chiral effective theories (including the explicit form of the topological susceptibility χ(θ) at small θ), discusses large-N scaling arguments and semiclassical/instanton methods with their regimes of validity, and surveys recent lattice Monte Carlo results on QCD topology from both quenched and dynamical simulations.

Significance. If the selected analytic expressions and lattice results accurately reflect the literature without distortion or major omissions, the chapter would provide a compact, accessible entry point for researchers working on axion phenomenology or lattice QCD topology. It reproduces standard results such as the chiral-limit topological susceptibility χ = Σ m_u m_d / (m_u + m_d) and compiles independent lattice determinations, which is useful for cross-checking regimes of validity across methods.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the chapter provides 'a selection of the most recent numerical results'; adding a brief statement in the introduction or lattice section on the cutoff date for included references (e.g., up to 2023 or 2024) would help readers assess completeness.
  2. [Chiral effective theories] In the chiral EFT section, the derivation of χ(θ) should explicitly reference the equation number when stating the small-θ expansion or the leading-order result in the two-flavor case to improve traceability.
  3. [Lattice results] Figure captions for lattice results should include the specific action, fermion discretization, and number of flavors for each data set shown, rather than relying solely on the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our pedagogical review and for the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review chapter: no original derivations or predictions present

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a pedagogical overview and survey of prior literature on θ-dependence in QCD. It summarizes known analytic results from chiral effective theories (e.g., standard χ = Σ m_u m_d / (m_u + m_d) in the chiral limit), large-N scaling, semiclassical instanton estimates, and lattice results from multiple independent collaborations. No new derivation chain, first-principles calculation, or prediction is claimed or performed; all expressions reproduce well-known external results. The central claim is to deliver an organized selection of existing work, with no internal steps that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes introduced within the paper itself. This is the standard honest outcome for a review chapter.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the standard axioms of QCD and lattice regularization; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption QCD is the fundamental theory of the strong interaction
    Invoked throughout the discussion of theta-dependence and topology.
  • domain assumption Lattice discretization provides a valid non-perturbative regularization of QCD
    Basis for the Monte Carlo results reviewed in the chapter.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5406 in / 1341 out tokens · 64136 ms · 2026-05-07T07:40:58.260531+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

290 extracted references · 281 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vicari, H

    E. Vicari, H. Panagopoulos,θdependence of SU(N)gauge theories in the presence of a topological term, Phys. Rept. 470 (2009) 93–150. arXiv:0803.1593,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.10.001 2009

  2. [2]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, Strong CP problem, Theta term and QCD topological properties, in: Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (to appear in the Encyclopedia of Particle Physics), Elsevier, 2026.arXiv:2510.03059,doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26598-3.00082-1

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26598-3.00082-1 2026

  3. [3]

    A. A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, Y . S. Tyupkin, Pseudoparticle solutions of the Y ang-Mills equations, Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 85–87.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-x 1975

  4. [4]

    Classical solutions of

    A. Actor, Classical solutions ofSU(2)yang–mills theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 461–525.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.461

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.461 1979

  5. [5]

    C. Vafa, E. Witten, Parity Conservation in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 535.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.535 1984

  6. [6]

    S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.2426

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.177.2426 1969

  7. [7]

    J. S. Bell, R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47–61.doi:10.1007/BF02823296

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02823296 1969

  8. [8]

    ’t Hooft, Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Symmetry Breaking Through Bell–Jackiw Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 8–11.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.8

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8 1976

  9. [9]

    Weinberg, The U(1) Problem, Phys

    S. Weinberg, The U(1) Problem, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 3583–3593.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3583

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.3583 1975

  10. [10]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0 1974

  11. [11]

    U(1) without instantons

    G. Veneziano,U(1)Without Instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 213–224.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90332-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90332-8 1979

  12. [12]

    Witten, LargeNChiral Dynamics, Annals Phys

    E. Witten, LargeNChiral Dynamics, Annals Phys. 128 (1980) 363.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90325-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90325-5 1980

  13. [13]

    Di Vecchia, G

    P . Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, Chiral Dynamics in the Large N Limit, Nucl. Phys. B 171 (1980) 253–272.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80) 90370-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80 1980

  14. [14]

    A. Pich, E. de Rafael, Strong CP violation in an effective chiral Lagrangian approach, Nucl. Phys. B 367 (1991) 313–333.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(91)90019-T

    1991

  15. [15]

    Borasoy, The Electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    B. Borasoy, The Electric dipole moment of the neutron in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 114017.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0004011,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.114017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.114017 2000

  16. [16]

    W. H. Hockings, U. van Kolck, The Electric dipole form factor of the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005) 273–278.arXiv:nucl-th/0508012, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.043 2005

  17. [17]

    Narison, A Fresh Look into the Neutron EDM and Magnetic Susceptibility, Phys

    S. Narison, A Fresh Look into the Neutron EDM and Magnetic Susceptibility, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 455–461.arXiv:0806.2618, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.083

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.083 2008

  18. [18]

    Ottnad, B

    K. Ottnad, B. Kubis, U. G. Meissner, F . K. Guo, New insights into the neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 42–47. arXiv:0911.3981,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.005 2010

  19. [19]

    de Vries, R

    J. de Vries, R. G. E. Timmermans, E. Mereghetti, U. van Kolck, The Nucleon Electric Dipole Form Factor From Dimension-Six Time- Reversal Violation, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 268–274.arXiv:1006.2304,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.042 2011

  20. [20]

    Mereghetti, J

    E. Mereghetti, J. de Vries, W. H. Hockings, C. M. Maekawa, U. van Kolck, The Electric Dipole Form Factor of the Nucleon in Chiral Perturbation Theory to Sub-leading Order, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 97–102.arXiv:1010.4078,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.018 2011

  21. [21]

    Guo, U.-G

    F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meissner, Baryon electric dipole moments from strong CP violation, JHEP 12 (2012) 097.arXiv:1210.5887,doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)097

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)097 2012

  22. [22]

    Bartolini, F

    L. Bartolini, F . Bigazzi, S. Bolognesi, A. L. Cotrone, A. Manenti,θdependence in Holographic QCD, JHEP 02 (2017) 029.arXiv: 1611.00048,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)029

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)029 2017

  23. [23]

    Abel, et al., Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys

    C. Abel, et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (8) (2020) 081803.arXiv: 2001.11966,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.081803 2020

  24. [24]

    W.-Y . Ai, J. S. Cruz, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, Consequences of the order of the limit of infinite spacetime volume and the sum over topological sectors for CP violation in the strong interactions, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136616.arXiv:2001.07152,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2021.136616

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2021

  25. [25]

    W.-Y . Ai, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, CP Conservation in the Strong Interactions, Universe 10 (5) (2024) 189.arXiv:2404.16026,doi: 10.3390/universe10050189

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10050189 2024

  26. [26]

    Nakamura, G

    Y . Nakamura, G. Schierholz, The strong CP problem solved by itself due to long-distance vacuum effects, Nucl. Phys. B 986 (2023) 116063.arXiv:2106.11369,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.116063

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.116063 2023

  27. [27]

    Schierholz, Repercussions of the Peccei-Quinn axion on QCD, Mod

    G. Schierholz, Repercussions of the Peccei-Quinn axion on QCD, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 40 (04) (2025) 2430009.arXiv:2307.08310, doi:10.1142/S021773232430009X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773232430009x 2025

  28. [28]

    Schierholz, Absence of strong CP violation, J

    G. Schierholz, Absence of strong CP violation, J. Phys. G 52 (4) (2025) 04LT01.arXiv:2403.13508,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adc31d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adc31d 2025

  29. [29]

    Albandea, G

    D. Albandea, G. Catumba, A. Ramos, Strong CP problem in the quantum rotor, Phys. Rev. D 110 (9) (2024) 094512.arXiv:2402.17518, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.094512 2024

  30. [30]

    D. E. Kaplan, T. Melia, S. Rajendran, What can solve the strong CP problem?, JHEP 08 (2025) 050.arXiv:2505.08358,doi:10.1007/ JHEP08(2025)050

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    J. N. Benabou, A. Hook, C. A. Manzari, H. Murayama, B. R. Safdi, Clearing up the Strong CP problem,preprint(2025).arXiv:2510.18951

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    V. V. Khoze, A note on instantons,θ-dependence and strong CP,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.06827

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gamboa, N

    J. Gamboa, N. A. T. Arellano, Strong CP as an Infrared Holonomy: TheθVacuum and Dressing in Y ang-Mills Theory,preprint(2025). arXiv:2512.24480

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Bhattacharya, Comment on the claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.10127

    T. Bhattacharya, Comment on the claim of physical irrelevance of the topological term,preprint(2025).arXiv:2512.10127

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    A. G. Williams, Perspectives on QCD, Topology and the Strong CP Problem,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.07165

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Aghaie, R

    M. Aghaie, R. Sato, A particle on a ring or: how I learned to stop worrying and loveθ-vacua,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.18248

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Ringwald, CP , or not CP , that is the question

    A. Ringwald, CP , or not CP , that is the question. . ., PoS COSMICWISPers2025 (2026) 001.arXiv:2601.04718

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Sannino, Strong CP and the QCD Axion: Lecture Notes via Effective Field Theory,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.19735

    F . Sannino, Strong CP and the QCD Axion: Lecture Notes via Effective Field Theory,preprint(2026).arXiv:2601.19735

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Strocchi, The strong CP problem revisited and solved by the gauge group topology,preprint(2024).arXiv:2404.19400

    F . Strocchi, The strong CP problem revisited and solved by the gauge group topology,preprint(2024).arXiv:2404.19400

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    D. B. Kaplan, Chiral Gauge Theory at the Boundary between Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (14) (2024) 141603.arXiv: 2312.01494,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.141603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.141603 2024

  41. [41]

    D. B. Kaplan, S. Sen, Weyl Fermions on a Finite Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (14) (2024) 141604.arXiv:2312.04012,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.141604

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    D. B. Kaplan, A. V. Manohar, Current Mass Ratios of the Light Quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56. 2004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56 1986

  43. [43]

    K. Choi, C. W. Kim, W. K. Sze, Mass Renormalization by Instantons and the Strong CP Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 794. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.794. 20Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.794 1988

  44. [44]

    Banks, Y

    T. Banks, Y . Nir, N. Seiberg, Missing (up) mass, accidental anomalous symmetries, and the strong CP problem, in: 2nd IFT Workshop on Yukawa Couplings and the Origins of Mass, 1994, pp. 26–41.arXiv:hep-ph/9403203

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994

  45. [45]

    Alexandrou, J

    C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, L. Funcke, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, F . Pittler, C. Urbach, Ruling Out the Massless Up-Quark Solution to the StrongCPCPCPProblem by Computing the Topological Mass Contribution with Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (23) (2020) 232001. arXiv:2002.07802,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.232001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.232001 2020

  46. [46]

    and others

    Y . Aoki, et al., FLAG Review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) (2022) 869.arXiv:2111.09849,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1 2021

  47. [47]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.38.1440

    1977

  48. [48]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1791

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1791 1977

  49. [49]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F . Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.40.279

    1978

  50. [50]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  51. [52]

    L. F . Abbott, P . Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83) 90638-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83 1983

  52. [53]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1 1983

  53. [54]

    Wantz, E

    O. Wantz, E. P . S. Shellard, Axion Cosmology Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123508.arXiv:0910.1066,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82. 123508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82 2010

  54. [55]

    Lattice QCD input for axion cosmology

    E. Berkowitz, M. I. Buchoff, E. Rinaldi, Lattice QCD input for axion cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 92 (3) (2015) 034507.arXiv:1505.07455, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.034507 2015

  55. [56]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117.arXiv:2003.01100, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 2020

  56. [57]

    N. H. Christ, Conservation Law Violation at High-Energy by Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 1591.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1591

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.1591 1980

  57. [58]

    F . R. Klinkhamer, N. S. Manton, A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2212.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.30.2212

    1984

  58. [59]

    F . R. Klinkhamer, P . Nagel, SU(3) sphaleron: Numerical solution, Phys. Rev. D 96 (1) (2017) 016006.arXiv:1704.07756,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.016006

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [60]

    Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle

    G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432–3450, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 18, 2199 (1978)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3432 1976

  60. [61]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Ques- tions,

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 339–376.arXiv:1802.04801,doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852 2018

  61. [62]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A 803 (2008) 227–253.arXiv:0711.0950,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298 2008

  62. [63]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, H. J. Warringa, The Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074033.arXiv:0808.3382,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.074033 2008

  63. [64]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, H. J. Warringa, Real-time dynamics of the Chiral Magnetic Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 212001. arXiv:1002.2495,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.212001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.212001 2010

  64. [65]

    D. E. Kharzeev, The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014) 133–151.arXiv:1312. 3348,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.01.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.01.002 2014

  65. [66]

    G. D. Moore, M. Tassler, The Sphaleron Rate in SU(N) Gauge Theory, JHEP 02 (2011) 105.arXiv:1011.1167,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2011)105

    work page arXiv 2011

  66. [67]

    Barroso Mancha, G

    M. Barroso Mancha, G. D. Moore, The sphaleron rate from 4D Euclidean lattices, JHEP 01 (2023) 155.arXiv:2210.05507,doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2023)155

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)155 2023

  67. [68]

    Y . Feng, S. A. Voloshin, F . Wang, Experimental search for the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: A perspective, Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (3) (2025) 031001.arXiv:2502.09742,doi:10.1103/xk4f-wm9s

    work page doi:10.1103/xk4f-wm9s 2025

  68. [69]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, P . Tribedy, Chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions: The present and future, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33 (09) (2024) 2430007.arXiv:2405.05427,doi:10.1142/9789811294679_0006

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811294679_0006 2024

  69. [70]

    Notari, F

    A. Notari, F . Rompineve, G. Villadoro, Improved Hot Dark Matter Bound on the QCD Axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (1) (2023) 011004. arXiv:2211.03799,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.011004 2023

  70. [71]

    Bianchini, G

    F . Bianchini, G. G. di Cortona, M. Valli, QCD axion: Some like it hot, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123527.arXiv:2310.08169,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123527

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123527 2024

  71. [72]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, Cosmology of axion dark matter, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 040.arXiv:2403.17697,doi:10.22323/1.454.0040

    work page doi:10.22323/1.454.0040 2024

  72. [73]

    Energy and momentum dependence of the soft-axion interaction rate

    K. Bouzoud, J. Ghiglieri, M. Laine, G. S. S. Sakoda, Energy and momentum dependence of the soft-axion interaction rate,preprint(2026). arXiv:2601.08221

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  73. [74]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, L. G. Y affe, QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981) 43.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.53.43

    1981

  74. [75]

    R. D. Pisarski, L. G. Y affe, The density of instantons at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980) 110–112.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80) 90559-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80 1980

  75. [76]

    Boccaletti, D

    A. Boccaletti, D. Nogradi, The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited, JHEP 03 (2020) 045.arXiv:2001.03383, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)045 2020

  76. [77]

    Witten,θ-dependence in the large-Nlimit of four-dimensional gauge theories, Phys

    E. Witten,θ-dependence in the large-Nlimit of four-dimensional gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2862–2865.arXiv:hep-th/ 9807109,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2862

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2862 1998

  77. [78]

    Vonk, F .-K

    T. Vonk, F .-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, Aspects of the QCDθ-vacuum, JHEP 06 (2019) 106, [Erratum: JHEP 028 (2019) 028].arXiv: 1905.06141,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)106

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2019)106 2019

  78. [79]

    The QCD topological charge and its thermal dependence: the role of the η′

    A. G ´omez Nicola, J. Ruiz De Elvira, A. Vioque-Rodr ´ıguez, The QCD topological charge and its thermal dependence: the role of theη ′, JHEP 11 (2019) 086.arXiv:1907.11734,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)086

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)086 2019

  79. [80]

    D’Adda, M

    A. D’Adda, M. L ¨uscher, P . Di Vecchia, A1/NExpandable Series of Nonlinear Sigma Models with Instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 146 (1978) 63–76.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90432-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90432-7 1978

  80. [81]

    L ¨uscher, The Secret Long Range Force in Quantum Field Theories With Instantons, Phys

    M. L ¨uscher, The Secret Long Range Force in Quantum Field Theories With Instantons, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 465–467.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(78)90487-2. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle21

    1978

Showing first 80 references.