pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00476 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

A consistent formulation of stochastic inflation I: Non-Markovian effects and issues beyond linear perturbations

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords stochasticcontributionformulationinflationtermsdeterministicnoisenon-markovian
0
0 comments X

The pith

The conventional truncation in stochastic inflation is inconsistent because quadratic-noise contributions are the same perturbative order as the deterministic non-Markovian corrections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Stochastic inflation treats the long-wavelength part of the inflaton field as a random process driven by short-wavelength fluctuations. Using the Schwinger-Keldysh approach, the short-wavelength modes evolve on top of the random long-wavelength background. Because that evolution remembers the history of the background, the effective noise felt by the long modes is non-Markovian. The authors split the noise into a deterministic piece coming from the linear response of the short modes and a stochastic piece coming from terms quadratic in the noise itself. In the usual approximation that keeps only the deterministic piece, the dynamics looks Markovian on attractor backgrounds but history-dependent otherwise. The key finding is that the quadratic-noise piece enters at exactly the same order in perturbation theory, so dropping it is not justified when one wants nonlinear corrections.

Core claim

We finally show that the stochastic contribution is of the same perturbative order as the deterministic one, which indicate that the conventional truncation is generically inconsistent and quadratic-noise terms may be required for a consistent treatment of nonlinear perturbations in stochastic inflation.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that UV-mode solutions can be derived perturbatively up to second order on a stochastic IR background while neglecting higher-order back-reaction and that the decomposition into deterministic and stochastic noise parts remains valid beyond linear order.

read the original abstract

We investigate the origin of non-Markovianity in stochastic inflation and its implications for nonlinear perturbation theory. In the Schwinger--Keldysh formulation, the noise terms sourcing the infrared (IR) Langevin equations are determined by ultraviolet (UV) modes evolving on top of the stochastic IR background. Since the UV-mode evolution generally depends on the past history of the IR sector, the resulting stochastic dynamics is intrinsically non-Markovian. Working perturbatively, we derive the UV-mode solutions up to second order and decompose the corresponding noise contributions into two parts. The first is a ``deterministic'' contribution, generated by the functional Taylor expansion of the first-order UV solution around the background trajectory. The second is a genuinely ``stochastic'' contribution, originating from terms in the UV-mode equations that are quadratic in the noise variables and are usually neglected in the standard formulation of stochastic inflation. Under this conventional truncation, the deterministic contribution reduces to a Markovian correction in attractor backgrounds, whereas it could become history dependent in non-attractor phases and gives rise to non-Markovian terms involving integrals over first-order IR perturbations. We finally show that the stochastic contribution is of the same perturbative order as the deterministic one, which indicate that the conventional truncation is generically inconsistent and quadratic-noise terms may be required for a consistent treatment of nonlinear perturbations in stochastic inflation. Our analysis clarifies the perturbative structure of non-Markovianity and provides the basis for a systematic treatment of quadratic-noise effects beyond the standard formulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates non-Markovian effects in stochastic inflation within the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. It derives second-order solutions for UV modes evolving on a stochastic IR background, decomposes the resulting noise into a deterministic part (from functional Taylor expansion of the first-order UV solution) and a stochastic part (from quadratic noise terms usually neglected), and shows that the stochastic contribution enters at the same perturbative order as the deterministic one. This leads to the claim that the conventional truncation is generically inconsistent for nonlinear perturbations, with quadratic-noise terms required for consistency; non-Markovianity arises from the deterministic part in non-attractor phases.

Significance. If the central perturbative order-counting result holds, the work identifies a structural inconsistency in standard stochastic inflation beyond linear order and supplies a systematic basis for including quadratic-noise effects. This would be relevant for accurate modeling in non-attractor regimes and for the reliability of nonlinear perturbation predictions in inflationary cosmology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of second-order UV solutions (abstract and presumed §3-4)] The central claim that the stochastic (quadratic-noise) contribution is of the same perturbative order as the deterministic one rests on the order counting in the Schwinger-Keldysh equations for UV modes on the stochastic IR background. The manuscript asserts that higher-order back-reaction can be neglected within the stated expansion, but without explicit verification of truncation validity or numerical cross-checks this order counting remains unconfirmed and is load-bearing for the inconsistency conclusion.
  2. [UV-mode evolution and noise decomposition] The weakest assumption is that UV-mode solutions can be derived perturbatively to second order while the decomposition into deterministic and stochastic noise parts remains valid beyond linear order. This needs stronger justification, particularly when the IR background is itself stochastic and in non-attractor phases where history dependence is claimed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Clarify notation for the deterministic versus stochastic noise decomposition to prevent overlap with standard stochastic-inflation terminology.
  2. [Introduction] Add a brief discussion or reference to prior literature on non-Markovian stochastic inflation to situate the new decomposition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. The feedback has helped us identify areas where the presentation can be improved. Below, we provide detailed responses to the major comments and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Derivation of second-order UV solutions (abstract and presumed §3-4)] The central claim that the stochastic (quadratic-noise) contribution is of the same perturbative order as the deterministic one rests on the order counting in the Schwinger-Keldysh equations for UV modes on the stochastic IR background. The manuscript asserts that higher-order back-reaction can be neglected within the stated expansion, but without explicit verification of truncation validity or numerical cross-checks this order counting remains unconfirmed and is load-bearing for the inconsistency conclusion.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In our derivation, the perturbative order is determined by expanding the UV mode solutions in powers of the IR fluctuations, which are assumed small. The deterministic part arises from the first-order UV solution's dependence on the IR background via functional Taylor expansion, while the stochastic part comes from quadratic terms in the noise within the second-order equations. These quadratic terms are indeed of the same order as the deterministic corrections at second order. Higher-order back-reaction effects, involving cubic or higher interactions, are suppressed by additional powers of the small parameter and are neglected consistently. To address the concern about verification, we have included in the revised manuscript an explicit estimation of the magnitude of the neglected terms in the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism, demonstrating that they are higher order. While numerical cross-checks would be valuable, they lie outside the analytical scope of the current work; we have noted this as a direction for future research. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [UV-mode evolution and noise decomposition] The weakest assumption is that UV-mode solutions can be derived perturbatively to second order while the decomposition into deterministic and stochastic noise parts remains valid beyond linear order. This needs stronger justification, particularly when the IR background is itself stochastic and in non-attractor phases where history dependence is claimed.

    Authors: We agree that stronger justification is beneficial. The perturbative solution for UV modes is obtained by iteratively solving the mode equations, treating the stochastic IR background as a perturbation. The decomposition is valid at second order because the deterministic contribution is linear in the first-order IR perturbations (via the Taylor expansion), and the stochastic contribution is quadratic in the first-order noise, both entering at the same perturbative level. In non-attractor phases, the non-Markovianity stems from the time-nonlocal integrals in the deterministic part, but this does not invalidate the perturbative expansion as long as the IR amplitude remains perturbatively small. We have added further details and clarifications in sections 3 and 4 of the revised manuscript to elaborate on the validity of this approach in both attractor and non-attractor regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript derives UV-mode solutions perturbatively to second order on a stochastic IR background using the standard Schwinger-Keldysh formalism, then decomposes noise into deterministic (from functional Taylor expansion) and stochastic (quadratic-noise) parts. The order-counting argument that quadratic-noise terms enter at the same perturbative order follows directly from the structure of the Schwinger-Keldysh equations and the perturbative expansion without any self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. All steps remain independent of the target result and are externally verifiable against the underlying field-theory equations. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions of perturbative quantum field theory on a stochastic background and the Schwinger-Keldysh contour; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption UV modes can be solved perturbatively to second order on a stochastic IR background
    Invoked to derive the noise decomposition and order counting.
  • standard math Schwinger-Keldysh formalism correctly captures the noise sourced by UV modes
    Basis for determining the IR Langevin noise from UV evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1323 out tokens · 65411 ms · 2026-05-09T19:07:40.646908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A generalized Fokker-Planck equation for stochastic inflation is derived from a Polchinski-type renormalization group flow on the density matrix, incorporating dissipative and diffusive corrections beyond the leading order.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Stochastic De Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107–126

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the de Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357–6368, [astro-ph/9407016]

  3. [3]

    Perreault Levasseur,Lagrangian formulation of stochastic inflation: Langevin equations, one-loop corrections and a proposed recursive approach,Phys

    L. Perreault Levasseur,Lagrangian formulation of stochastic inflation: Langevin equations, one-loop corrections and a proposed recursive approach,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 083537, [1304.6408]

  4. [4]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato and M. Williams,EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,JHEP03(2015) 090, [1408.5002]

  5. [5]

    Burgess, R

    C. Burgess, R. Holman and G. Tasinato,Open EFTs, IR effects & late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,JHEP01(2016) 153, [1512.00169]

  6. [6]

    Moss and G

    I. Moss and G. Rigopoulos,Effective long wavelength scalar dynamics in de Sitter,JCAP05 (2017) 009, [1611.07589]. – 19 –

  7. [7]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochastic attractor?, JCAP05(2017) 045, [1703.00447]

  8. [8]

    Gorbenko and L

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,λϕ 4 in dS,1911.00022

  9. [9]

    Baumgart and R

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum,De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time,JHEP 07(2020) 119, [1912.09502]

  10. [10]

    Mirbabayi,Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,JCAP12(2020) 006 [1911.00564]

    M. Mirbabayi,Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,JCAP12(2020) 006, [1911.00564]

  11. [11]

    Mirbabayi,Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,JCAP09(2021) 038 [2010.06604]

    M. Mirbabayi,Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,JCAP09(2021) 038, [2010.06604]

  12. [12]

    Cohen and D

    T. Cohen and D. Green,Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,JHEP12(2020) 041, [2007.03693]

  13. [13]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green, A. Premkumar and A. Ridgway,Stochastic Inflation at NNLO,JHEP09 (2021) 159, [2106.09728]

  14. [14]

    Cruces, C

    D. Cruces, C. Germani and T. Prokopec,Failure of the stochastic approach to inflation beyond slow-roll,JCAP03(2019) 048, [1807.09057]

  15. [15]

    Cruces and C

    D. Cruces and C. Germani,Stochastic inflation at all order in slow-roll parameters: Foundations,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 023533, [2107.12735]

  16. [16]

    Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, 29 Universe8, 334 (2022), arXiv:2203.13852 [gr-qc]

    D. Cruces,Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation,Universe8(2022) 334, [2203.13852]

  17. [17]

    Li,Stochastic Inflation as an Open Quantum System,Phys

    Y.-Z. Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system,2507.02070

  18. [18]

    Tsamis and R.P

    N. Tsamis and R. Woodard,Stochastic quantum gravitational inflation,Nucl. Phys. B724 (2005) 295–328, [gr-qc/0505115]

  19. [19]

    Enqvist, S

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, D. Podolsky and G. Rigopoulos,On the divergences of inflationary superhorizon perturbations,JCAP04(2008) 025, [0802.0395]

  20. [20]

    Seery,Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions,Class

    D. Seery,Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 124005, [1005.1649]

  21. [21]

    Garbrecht, G

    B. Garbrecht, G. Rigopoulos and Y. Zhu,Infrared correlations in de Sitter space: Field theoretic versus stochastic approach,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 063506, [1310.0367]

  22. [22]

    Garbrecht, F

    B. Garbrecht, F. Gautier, G. Rigopoulos and Y. Zhu,Feynman Diagrams for Stochastic Inflation and Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 063520, [1412.4893]

  23. [23]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Statistical nature of infrared dynamics on de Sitter background, JCAP02(2018) 014, [1708.01734]

  24. [24]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Can all the infrared secular growth really be understood as increase of classical statistical variance?,JCAP11(2018) 022, [1806.03262]

  25. [25]

    Honda, R

    M. Honda, R. Jinno, L. Pinol and K. Tokeshi,Borel resummation of secular divergences in stochastic inflation,JHEP08(2023) 060, [2304.02592]

  26. [26]

    C´ espedes, A.-C

    S. C´ espedes, A.-C. Davis and D.-G. Wang,On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction,JHEP04(2024) 004, [2311.17990]

  27. [27]

    G. A. Palma and S. Sypsas,Non-Gaussian statistics of de Sitter spectators: a perturbative derivation of stochastic dynamics,JHEP12(2025) 170, [2309.16474]

  28. [28]

    G. A. Palma and S. Sypsas,Revisiting stochastic inflation with perturbation theory, 2311.17644

  29. [29]

    G. A. Palma, S. Sypsas and D. Tapia,Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism,2507.21310

  30. [30]

    Nakao, Y

    K.-i. Nakao, Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki,Stochastic Dynamics of New Inflation,Prog. Theor. Phys.80(1988) 1041. – 20 –

  31. [31]

    Generation of fluctuations during inflation: comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca and G. Venturi,Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 044007, [0808.1786]

  32. [32]

    , JCAP 08 (2019) 001 [arXiv:1904.11917]. T. Tenkanen,\Dark matter from scalar eld uctuations

    T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, S. Stopyra and T. Tenkanen,Scalar correlation functions in de Sitter space from the stochastic spectral expansion,JCAP08(2019) 001, [1904.11917]

  33. [33]

    Markkanen and A

    T. Markkanen and A. Rajantie,Scalar correlation functions for a double-well potential in de Sitter space,JCAP03(2020) 049, [2001.04494]

  34. [34]

    Cable and A

    A. Cable and A. Rajantie,Free scalar correlators in de Sitter space via the stochastic approach beyond the slow-roll approximation,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103511, [2011.00907]

  35. [35]

    Cable and A

    A. Cable and A. Rajantie,Second-order stochastic theory for self-interacting scalar fields in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 123522, [2209.02545]

  36. [36]

    Cable and A

    A. Cable and A. Rajantie,Stochastic parameters for scalar fields in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 045017, [2310.07356]

  37. [37]

    Bhattacharya and N

    S. Bhattacharya and N. Joshi,Non-perturbative analysis for a massless minimal quantum scalar with V(ϕ) =λϕ 4/4! +βϕ 3/3! in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime,JCAP03(2023) 058, [2211.12027]

  38. [38]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tada and T. Takesako,A new algorithm for calculating the curvature perturbations in stochastic inflation,JCAP12(2013) 036, [1308.4754]

  39. [39]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki and Y. Tada,Non-perturbative approach for curvature perturbations in stochasticδNformalism,JCAP10(2014) 030, [1405.2187]

  40. [40]

    Vennin and A

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky,Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 413, [1506.04732]

  41. [41]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175–178

  42. [42]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,JETP Lett.42(1985) 152–155

  43. [43]

    A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations produced during Inflation

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart,A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations Produced during Inflation,Progress of Theoretical Physics95(01, 1996) 71, [astro-ph/9507001]

  44. [44]

    Super-Horizon Scale Dynamics of Multi-Scalar Inflation

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation,Prog. Theor. Phys.99(1998) 763–782, [gr-qc/9801017]

  45. [45]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik and M. Sasaki,A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation,JCAP05(2005) 004, [astro-ph/0411220]

  46. [46]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,JCAP10(2017) 046, [1707.00537]

  47. [47]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and V. Vennin,The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes,JCAP03(2020) 029, [1912.05399]

  48. [48]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Rey, M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Stochastic inflationary dynamics beyond slow-roll and consequences for primordial black hole formation,JCAP08(2020) 043, [2006.14597]

  49. [49]

    D. G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 101302, [2012.06551]

  50. [50]

    D. G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Implications of stochastic effects for primordial black hole production in ultra-slow-roll inflation,JCAP05(2022) 027, [2111.07437]. – 21 –

  51. [51]

    Tomberg, Stochastic constant-roll inflation and pri- mordial black holes, Phys

    E. Tomberg,Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 043502, [2304.10903]

  52. [52]

    S. S. Mishra, E. J. Copeland and A. M. Green,Primordial black holes and stochastic inflation beyond slow roll. Part I. Noise matrix elements,JCAP09(2023) 005, [2303.17375]

  53. [53]

    Tada and M

    Y. Tada and M. Yamada,Stochastic dynamics of multi-waterfall hybrid inflation and formation of primordial black holes,JCAP11(2023) 089, [2306.07324]

  54. [54]

    Mizuguchi, T

    Y. Mizuguchi, T. Murata and Y. Tada,STOLAS: STOchastic LAttice Simulation of cosmic inflation,JCAP12(2024) 050, [2405.10692]

  55. [55]

    Murata and Y

    T. Murata and Y. Tada,Stochastic-tail of the curvature perturbation in hybrid inflation, 2507.22439

  56. [56]

    Kuroda, A

    T. Kuroda, A. Naruko, V. Vennin and M. Yamaguchi,Primordial black holes from a curvaton: the role of bimodal distributions,JCAP07(2025) 052, [2504.09548]

  57. [57]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Effect of stochastic kicks on primordial black hole abundance and mass via the compaction function,2510.09303

  58. [58]

    Ando and V

    K. Ando and V. Vennin,Power spectrum in stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2021) 057, [2012.02031]

  59. [59]

    Tada and V

    Y. Tada and V. Vennin,Statistics of coarse-grained cosmological fields in stochastic inflation, JCAP02(2022) 021, [2111.15280]

  60. [60]

    Kitajima, Y

    N. Kitajima, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama and C.-M. Yoo,Primordial black holes in peak theory with a non-Gaussian tail,JCAP10(2021) 053, [2109.00791]

  61. [61]

    Hooshangi, M

    S. Hooshangi, M. H. Namjoo and M. Noorbala,Rare events are nonperturbative: Primordial black holes from heavy-tailed distributions,Phys. Lett. B834(2022) 137400, [2112.04520]

  62. [62]

    A. D. Gow, H. Assadullahi, J. H. P. Jackson, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands, Non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,EPL142(2023) 49001, [2211.08348]

  63. [63]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. R¨ as¨ anen and E. Tomberg,Primordial Black Hole Compaction Function from Stochastic Fluctuations in Ultraslow-Roll Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 121403, [2312.12911]

  64. [64]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin,Clustering of primordial black holes from quantum diffusion during inflation,JCAP08(2024) 026, [2402.08642]

  65. [65]

    Vennin and D

    V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation, 2402.12672

  66. [66]

    J. H. P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A. D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll: noise modelling and importance sampling,2410.13683

  67. [67]

    Animali, P

    C. Animali, P. Auclair, B. Blachier and V. Vennin,Harvesting primordial black holes from stochastic trees withFOREST,2501.05371

  68. [68]

    Choudhury,Stochastic origin of primordial fluctuations in the Sky,2503.17635

    S. Choudhury,Stochastic origin of primordial fluctuations in the Sky,2503.17635

  69. [69]

    Murata and Y

    T. Murata and Y. Tada,STOchastic LAttice Simulation of hybrid inflation,2603.04850

  70. [70]

    P. Saha, Y. Tada and Y. Urakawa,Nonlinear Lattice Framework for Inflation: Bridging stochastic inflation and theδNformalism,2604.00978

  71. [71]

    Morikawa,Dissipation and Fluctuation of Quantum Fields in Expanding Universes,Phys

    M. Morikawa,Dissipation and Fluctuation of Quantum Fields in Expanding Universes,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 1027–1034

  72. [72]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada,A manifestly covariant theory of multifield stochastic inflation in phase space,JCAP04(2021) 048, [2008.07497]. – 22 –

  73. [73]

    R. K. Panda, S. Panda and A. Tinwala,Revisiting Lagrangian Formulation of Stochastic inflation,2510.03171

  74. [74]

    Y. L. Launay, G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard,Bunch-Davies initial conditions and nonperturbative inflationary dynamics in numerical relativity,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043518, [2502.06783]

  75. [75]

    Y. L. Launay, G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard,Stochastic Inflation in Numerical Relativity,2512.14649

  76. [76]

    Kawasaki and T

    M. Kawasaki and T. Kuroda,Numerical simulation of the stochastic formalism including non-Markovianity,2602.11652

  77. [77]

    Tomberg,Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise,JCAP04(2023) 042, [2210.17441]

    E. Tomberg,Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise,JCAP04(2023) 042, [2210.17441]

  78. [78]

    Tomberg,Itˆ o, Stratonovich, and zoom-in schemes in stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2025) 035, [2411.12465]

    E. Tomberg,Itˆ o, Stratonovich, and zoom-in schemes in stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2025) 035, [2411.12465]

  79. [79]

    Brahma, J

    S. Brahma, J. Calder´ on-Figueroa, X. Luo and D. Seery,The special case of slow-roll attractors in de Sitter: non-Markovian noise and evolution of entanglement entropy,JCAP04(2025) 050, [2411.08632]

  80. [80]

    Calder´ on-Figueroa and D

    J. Calder´ on-Figueroa and D. Seery,Stochastic instantons and the tail of the inflationary density perturbation,2510.04707

Showing first 80 references.