pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00790 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ⚛️ physics.comp-ph

Recognition: unknown

Unsupervised Learning of Quantum Phase Transitions for Bose-Hubbard lattice systems

Bihui Zhu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 14:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.comp-ph
keywords diffusion mapsunsupervised learningBose-Hubbard modelquantum phase transitionssymmetry-protected topological phasesmany-body localizationquantum simulationultracold atoms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Diffusion maps applied to raw simulation snapshots can distinguish quantum phases and transitions in Bose-Hubbard lattice systems without order parameters or handcrafted features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that diffusion maps, when applied to configuration snapshots from Bose-Hubbard lattice simulations, automatically group data into clusters that correspond to distinct quantum phases. This identification succeeds across ground-state transitions, including those with symmetry-protected topological order, and across nonequilibrium dynamics that separate ergodic from many-body localized regimes. A sympathetic reader would care because quantum simulators routinely generate large volumes of measurement data whose phase content is otherwise hard to extract without first guessing the right observables. The method therefore offers a route to phase discovery that starts from the data rather than from theoretical preconceptions about the Hamiltonian.

Core claim

An unsupervised learning approach based on diffusion maps identifies phase structure across distinct settings in bosonic lattice systems described by Bose-Hubbard type models without prior knowledge of order parameters or handcrafted observables, including ground-state transitions involving symmetry-protected topological phases and nonequilibrium regimes distinguishing ergodic and many-body localized behavior.

What carries the argument

Diffusion maps that embed high-dimensional lattice configuration snapshots into a lower-dimensional space according to their diffusion distances, thereby revealing clusters that align with physical phases.

If this is right

  • The same pipeline detects ground-state transitions that involve symmetry-protected topological phases.
  • Nonequilibrium dynamics can be partitioned into ergodic versus many-body localized regimes directly from the data.
  • The approach requires no explicit knowledge of the Hamiltonian or choice of order parameter.
  • Results obtained on classical simulations indicate the method can be applied to raw measurement records from ultracold-atom experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar embedding techniques might be tested on other lattice models or higher-dimensional systems where order parameters are unknown.
  • Application to real experimental data will likely require checks for robustness against shot noise and finite sampling that are not addressed in the simulations.
  • If the method succeeds on noisy data, it could shorten the loop between data collection and phase identification in current quantum simulators.

Load-bearing premise

The input data snapshots from Bose-Hubbard simulations contain sufficient information for diffusion maps to separate phases without additional feature engineering or knowledge of the underlying Hamiltonian.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be a collection of Bose-Hubbard snapshots from a system with a known, well-characterized phase transition that, after diffusion-map embedding and standard parameter choices, yields a single connected component with no separable clusters corresponding to the distinct phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00790 by Bihui Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the application of diffusion map approach for learning quantum phase transitions. Measure view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Ground state phase diagram for the 1D extended Bose Hubbard model at unit filling. The color bar represents the view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Quantum phase transition between two crystalline SPTs in model Eq. (6). The blue (red) line is the string order view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dynamical phases in a disordered Bose Hubbard chain. Left: DM results for quench dynamics from the density-wave view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamical phases in a disordered chain: comparison between different initial states. Results colored in orange (green) view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Phase diagram obtained from the PCA analysis for the model in Sec. III A of the main text. The colorbar indicates view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Characterizing quantum many-body phase structure is a major goal for quantum simulation. Here, we employ an unsupervised learning approach based on diffusion maps to learn phase transitions in bosonic lattice systems described by Bose-Hubbard type models, which can be realized in ultracold atoms and related quantum simulation platforms. We demonstrate that this approach identifies phase structure across distinct settings without prior knowledge of order parameters or handcrafted observables, including ground-state transitions involving symmetry-protected topological phases and nonequilibrium regimes distinguishing ergodic and many-body localized behavior. Our results indicate that the approach has the potential for direct application to experimentally accessible measurement data for learning quantum phases in current quantum simulators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an unsupervised learning method using diffusion maps applied to raw simulation snapshots from Bose-Hubbard lattice models to identify quantum phase transitions. It demonstrates the method's ability to detect phase structures in various settings, including ground-state transitions with symmetry-protected topological phases and nonequilibrium regimes separating ergodic and many-body localized behaviors, without relying on prior knowledge of order parameters or handcrafted observables.

Significance. If the results hold, this approach could provide a valuable tool for directly analyzing experimental data from quantum simulators such as ultracold atoms, enabling phase discovery with minimal theoretical assumptions. The fixed hyperparameters across examples and alignment of embeddings with known boundaries strengthen the unsupervised claim and reproducibility.

minor comments (2)
  1. The description of input data preparation (local density or correlation snapshots) should explicitly state the spatial resolution and system sizes used in each example to allow readers to assess information content without additional feature engineering.
  2. In the results sections showing embeddings and clustering, include quantitative metrics (e.g., silhouette scores or adjusted Rand index against known boundaries) alongside visualizations to strengthen the claim of successful phase separation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work, for highlighting its potential applicability to experimental data from quantum simulators, and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that fixed hyperparameters and alignment with known phase boundaries support the unsupervised nature of the method.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core procedure applies diffusion maps directly to unlabeled simulation snapshots (local densities or correlations) from Bose-Hubbard models. The resulting low-dimensional embedding and subsequent clustering are produced solely from the intrinsic geometry of the input data matrix; no phase labels, order parameters, or target quantities enter the diffusion-map construction or eigenvalue problem. Validation against known phase boundaries occurs only after the unsupervised step and serves as external consistency check rather than input to the algorithm. Hyperparameters are held fixed across examples, and no self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to close the derivation. Consequently the claimed separation of ground-state and nonequilibrium phases is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mathematical properties of diffusion maps and the assumption that simulation snapshots are representative of the phases; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Diffusion maps embed high-dimensional data according to a diffusion process that reveals underlying manifold structure corresponding to distinct phases.
    Invoked implicitly when claiming the method identifies phase structure from raw data without prior knowledge.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5395 in / 1247 out tokens · 24129 ms · 2026-05-09T14:39:53.291129+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    We also acknowledge the OU Supercomputing Center for Education & Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma (OU), on which part of the computing for this work was performed. Appendix A: Learning many-body localization In the case of learning MBL and thermal phases, the dataset can contain large density variations in the samples space, because the samp...

  2. [2]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Demler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriksson, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier-Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds, M. S...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579 (2017). 9

    2017

  5. [5]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho,et al., Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven rydberg atom arrays, Science371, 1355 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho,et al., Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koyluoglu, J. Feldmeier,et al., Quantum coarsening and collective dynamics on a programmable simulator, Nature638, 86 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, et al., Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Smith, A

    J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Hess, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nature Physics12, 907 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator, Nature551, 601 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth,et al., Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor, Science374, 1237 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    T. I. Andersen, N. Astrakhantsev, A. H. Karamlou, J. Berndtsson, J. Motruk, A. Szasz, J. A. Gross, A. Schuckert, T. Westerhout, Y. Zhang,et al., Thermalization and criticality on an analogue–digital quantum simulator, Nature638, 79 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, C. Quintana, A. Greene, Z. Chen, J. Gross, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush,et al., Time-crystalline eigenstate order on a quantum processor, Nature601, 531 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Lebrat, M

    M. Lebrat, M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, P. Seetharaman, I. Morera, E. Khatami, E. Demler, and M. Greiner, Observation of nagaoka polarons in a fermi–hubbard quantum simulator, Nature629, 317 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature619, 495 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, G. Ji, R. T. Scalettar, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, Frustration-and doping- induced magnetism in a fermi–hubbard simulator, Nature620, 971 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  19. [19]

    Jaksch, C

    D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998)

    1998

  20. [20]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  21. [21]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature462, 74 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic mott insulator, Nature467, 68 (2010)

    2010

  24. [24]

    Gross and W

    C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nature Physics17, 1316 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, B. Ye, F. Machado, J. Kemp, K. Srakaew, S. Hollerith, J. Rui, S. Gopalakrishnan, N. Y. Yao, et al., Quantum gas microscopy of kardar-parisi-zhang superdiffusion, Science376, 716 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Quantum-gas microscopy and Talbot interferometry of the Bose-glass phase

    L. Koehn, C. Parsonage, C. W. Duncan, P. Kirton, A. J. Daley, T. Hilker, E. Haller, A. La Rooij, and S. Kuhr, Quantum-gas microscopy of the bose-glass phase, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13040 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    L. Su, R. Sahay, M. Szurek, A. Douglas, O. Markovic, C. B. Dag, R. Verresen, and M. Greiner, Topological Phase Transitions and Mixed State Order in a Hubbard Quantum Simulator (2025), arXiv:2505.17009 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, A dissipatively stabilized mott insulator of photons, Nature566, 51 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Zhang, E

    X. Zhang, E. Kim, D. K. Mark, S. Choi, and O. Painter, A superconducting quantum simulator based on a photonic- bandgap metamaterial, Science379, 278 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    B. Du, R. Suresh, S. L´ opez, J. Cadiente, and R. Ma, Probing site-resolved current in strongly interacting superconducting circuit lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 060601 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    B. Du, Q. Guo, S. L´ opez, and R. Ma, Tunneling spectroscopy in superconducting circuit lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022038 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    S. Kim, B. Kang, P. Segura, Y. Li, E. Lake, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Multi-particle quantum walks in a dipole-conserving bose-hubbard model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02343 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    D. Wei, D. Adler, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of brane parity order in programmable optical lattices, Phys. Rev. X13, 021042 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Rubio-Abadal, M

    A. Rubio-Abadal, M. Ippoliti, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, J. Rui, S. L. Sondhi, V. Khemani, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Floquet prethermalization in a bose-hubbard system, Phys. Rev. X10, 021044 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011). 10

    2011

  38. [38]

    Lukinet al., Probing entanglement in a many-body–localized system, Science364, 256 (2019)

    A. Lukinet al., Probing entanglement in a many-body–localized system, Science364, 256 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science353, 794 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  41. [41]

    Z.-P. Cian, H. Dehghani, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, G. Zhu, M. Barkeshli, P. Zoller, and M. Hafezi, Many-body chern number from statistical correlations of randomized measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 050501 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Elben, J

    A. Elben, J. Yu, G. Zhu, M. Hafezi, F. Pollmann, P. Zoller, and B. Vermersch, Many-body topological invariants from randomized measurements in synthetic quantum matter, Science advances6, eaaz3666 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Carrasquilla and R

    J. Carrasquilla and R. G. Melko, Machine learning phases of matter, Nature Physics13, 431 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    E. P. Van Nieuwenburg, Y.-H. Liu, and S. D. Huber, Learning phase transitions by confusion, Nature Physics13, 435 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    B. S. Rem, N. K¨ aming, M. Tarnowski, L. Asteria, N. Fl¨ aschner, C. Becker, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Identifying quantum phase transitions using artificial neural networks on experimental data, Nature Physics15, 917 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Wang, Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning, Phys

    L. Wang, Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning, Phys. Rev. B94, 195105 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    W. Hu, R. R. P. Singh, and R. T. Scalettar, Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination, Phys. Rev. E95, 062122 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    S. J. Wetzel, Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: From principal component analysis to variational autoencoders, Phys. Rev. E96, 022140 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    K¨ aming, A

    N. K¨ aming, A. Dawid, K. Kottmann, M. Lewenstein, K. Sengstock, A. Dauphin, and C. Weitenberg, Unsupervised machine learning of topological phase transitions from experimental data, Machine Learning: Science and Technology2, 035037 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Ch’ng, N

    K. Ch’ng, N. Vazquez, and E. Khatami, Unsupervised machine learning account of magnetic transitions in the Hubbard model, Physical Review E97, 013306 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva and M. S. Scheurer, Identifying topological order through unsupervised machine learning, Nature Physics15, 790 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Lidiak and Z

    A. Lidiak and Z. Gong, Unsupervised Machine Learning of Quantum Phase Transitions Using Diffusion Maps, Physical Review Letters125, 225701 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Y. Che, C. Gneiting, T. Liu, and F. Nori, Topological quantum phase transitions retrieved through unsupervised machine learning, Physical Review B102, 134213 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Yu, S.-Y

    L.-W. Yu, S.-Y. Zhang, P.-X. Shen, and D.-L. Deng, Unsupervised learning of interacting topological phases from experi- mental observables, Fundamental Research4, 1086 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    R. Ziv, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, D. Adler, A. Keselman, E. Lustig, R. Talmon, J. Zeiher, I. Bloch, and M. Segev, Unsuper- vised Machine Learning for Experimental Detection of Quantum-Many-Body Phase Transitions (2025), arXiv:2512.01091 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Kuo and H

    E.-J. Kuo and H. Dehghani, Unsupervised learning of interacting topological and symmetry-breaking phase transitions, Physical Review B105, 235136 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Baier, M

    S. Baier, M. J. Mark, D. Petter, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, Z. Cai, M. Baranov, P. Zoller, and F. Ferlaino, Extended Bose-Hubbard models with ultracold magnetic atoms, Science352, 201 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    Fersterer, A

    P. Fersterer, A. Safavi-Naini, B. Zhu, L. Gabardos, S. Lepoutre, L. Vernac, B. Laburthe-Tolra, P. B. Blakie, and A. M. Rey, Dynamics of an itinerant spin-3 atomic dipolar gas in an optical lattice, Physical Review A100, 033609 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. H´ ebert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dickerson, F. Ferlaino, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner, Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a Hubbard quantum simulator, Nature 622, 724 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Berg, and E. Altman, Hidden Order in 1D Bose Insulators, Physical Review Letters97, 260401 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    Ejima, F

    S. Ejima, F. Lange, and H. Fehske, Spectral and Entanglement Properties of the Bosonic Haldane Insulator, Physical Review Letters113, 020401 (2014)

    2014

  62. [62]

    E. Berg, E. G. Dalla Torre, T. Giamarchi, and E. Altman, Rise and fall of hidden string order of lattice bosons, Physical Review B77, 245119 (2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    Rossini and R

    D. Rossini and R. Fazio, Phase diagram of the extended Bose–Hubbard model, New Journal of Physics14, 065012 (2012)

    2012

  64. [64]

    Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Physical Review Letters106, 106802 (2011)

    L. Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Physical Review Letters106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    T. L. Hughes, E. Prodan, and B. A. Bernevig, Inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Physical Review B83, 245132 (2011)

    2011

  66. [66]

    A. M. Turner, Y. Zhang, and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement and inversion symmetry in topological insulators, Physical Review B82, 241102 (2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    Rispoli, A

    M. Rispoli, A. Lukin, R. Schittko, S. Kim, M. E. Tai, J. L´ eonard, and M. Greiner, Quantum critical behaviour at the many-body localization transition, Nature573, 385 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Annals of Physics321, 1126 (2006)

    2006

  69. [69]

    D. A. Abanin and Z. Papi´ c, Recent progress in many-body localization, Annalen der Physik529, 1700169 (2017)

    2017

  70. [70]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 15 (2015). 11

    2015

  71. [71]

    D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, and V. Oganesyan, Phenomenology of fully many-body-localized systems, Physical Review B90, 174202 (2014)

    2014

  72. [72]

    T. B. Wahl, A. Pal, and S. H. Simon, Signatures of the many-body localized regime in two dimensions, Nature Physics 15, 164 (2019)

    2019

  73. [73]

    Alet and N

    F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics, Comptes Rendus. Physique19, 498 (2018)

    2018

  74. [74]

    Sierant and J

    P. Sierant and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization of bosons in optical lattices, New Journal of Physics20, 043032 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    Yao and J

    R. Yao and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization in the Bose-Hubbard model: Evidence for mobility edge, Physical Review B102, 014310 (2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of Slow Dynamics near the Many-Body Localization Transition in One-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems, Physical Review Letters119, 260401 (2017)

    2017

  77. [77]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science349, 842 (2015)

    2015

  78. [78]

    J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science352, 1547 (2016), arXiv:1604.04178 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, W. Xu, and B. DeMarco, Disorder-Induced Localization in a Strongly Correlated Atomic Hubbard Gas, Physical Review Letters114, 083002 (2015)

    2015

  80. [80]

    Pal and D

    A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization phase transition, Physical Review B82, 174411 (2010)

    2010

Showing first 80 references.