pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01443 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP· quant-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A position dependent mass Hamiltonian and abstract ladder operators

Antonino Faddetta, Emanuele Balistreri, Fabio Bagarello

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MPquant-ph
keywords position-dependent massabstract ladder operatorspseudo-bosonic operatorsbi-coherent statesnon-self-adjoint Hamiltonianfactorizable operatorsquantum mechanics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Abstract ladder operators find eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a position-dependent mass Hamiltonian that is factorizable, even if not self-adjoint, via pseudo-bosonic operators and attached bi-coherent states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the method of abstract ladder operators to a one-dimensional Hamiltonian for a particle whose mass varies with position. It restricts attention to factorizable cases and drops the usual self-adjointness requirement. Under these conditions the ladder operators generate pseudo-bosonic operators whose action yields the energy eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The same operators allow the explicit construction of bi-coherent states. A reader would care because the setting covers physically relevant models in which mass is not constant and the operator may fail to be Hermitian.

Core claim

We consider the Hamiltonian H of a particle in one dimension with a position dependent mass for which we apply the recent strategy of the so-called abstract ladder operators, in the attempt to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We don't assume that H is self-adjoint, while we focus on the case of a factorizable operator. We show then that pseudo-bosonic operators play a relevant role in this analysis, and we construct bi-coherent states attached to these operators.

What carries the argument

Abstract ladder operators defined on a factorizable position-dependent-mass Hamiltonian, which produce pseudo-bosonic operators and permit construction of bi-coherent states.

If this is right

  • The eigenvalues of such Hamiltonians can be found algebraically without solving a differential equation.
  • The corresponding eigenvectors are obtained by applying the ladder operators to a reference state.
  • Bi-coherent states exist and are explicitly constructible for the pseudo-bosonic operators that arise.
  • The procedure remains valid for non-self-adjoint operators that are still factorizable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ladder-operator technique may apply to other non-Hermitian Hamiltonians that arise in effective models with variable coefficients.
  • Bi-coherent states could be used to study time evolution or resolution of the identity in position-dependent-mass systems.
  • The construction suggests a route for defining coherent-state bases in any quantum system whose Hamiltonian is factorizable but not necessarily Hermitian.

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian must admit a factorization that lets abstract ladder operators be defined and applied to extract the spectrum.

What would settle it

A concrete factorizable position-dependent-mass Hamiltonian whose eigenvalues or eigenvectors cannot be recovered by repeated action of the abstract ladder operators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01443 by Antonino Faddetta, Emanuele Balistreri, Fabio Bagarello.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: |ψ(z; x)| 2 (in orange) and |α(z, λ)φ(z1; x)| 2 (in blue) for m(x) = m0e −x 2 . On the top we fix x = 1 and λ = −2 and we plot the functions for zr, zi , and γ = 1 (top left) and γ = 1+2i (top right). Bottom: we plot the functions for x, zi and zR = 3, λR = −2, γ = 1 with λ = −2 (left) and λ = −2 + 2i (right). and it follows from (C.5) Nφ,0 = Nψ,0 =  ℏ r π −λ e − γ 2ℏ 2 λ − 1 2 . In this case the square-… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: depicts the same difference already observed in view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows again the same differences beween self-adjoint and non self-adjoint cases for bi-coherent states view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the Hamiltonian $H$ of a particle in one dimension with a position dependent mass for which we apply the recent strategy of the so-called {\em abstract ladder operators}, in the attempt to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We don't assume that $H$ is self-adjoint, while we focus on the case of a factorizable operator. We show then that pseudo-bosonic operators play a relevant role in this analysis, and we construct bi-coherent states attached to these operators. Explicit examples are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers a one-dimensional Hamiltonian with position-dependent mass that is factorizable (but not necessarily self-adjoint). It applies the abstract ladder operator technique to determine eigenvalues and eigenvectors, establishes the relevance of pseudo-bosonic operators in this setting, constructs associated bi-coherent states, and illustrates the results with explicit examples.

Significance. If the constructions are correct, the work extends abstract ladder and pseudo-boson methods to a physically relevant class of non-Hermitian position-dependent-mass operators. The explicit examples provide concrete verification and could facilitate applications in variable-mass quantum models. The approach is grounded in the factorizability assumption rather than ad-hoc fitting.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that explicit examples are discussed, but the introduction or §2 could briefly name the specific forms of the mass function m(x) and potential used in those examples to orient the reader.
  2. [§3] Notation for the abstract ladder operators A and A† (and their pseudo-bosonic counterparts) should be introduced with a short comparison table or explicit commutation relations to avoid confusion with standard bosonic operators.
  3. [§4] In the construction of bi-coherent states, the overlap or resolution-of-identity property is asserted; a one-line reference to the relevant prior result (or a short derivation) would strengthen readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the scope and contributions of the work on abstract ladder operators for a factorizable position-dependent mass Hamiltonian, including the role of pseudo-bosonic operators and bi-coherent states.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of abstract ladder/pseudo-boson framework; central application to factorizable PDM Hamiltonian remains independent

full rationale

The paper applies the abstract ladder operator method to a position-dependent-mass Hamiltonian that is factorizable (but not necessarily self-adjoint), derives the relevance of pseudo-bosonic operators, and constructs attached bi-coherent states, with explicit examples provided. These techniques originate in prior literature that overlaps with the authors, but the load-bearing steps are the explicit factorization assumption on H and the direct construction of eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and states for the new Hamiltonian class. No step reduces by definition to a fitted parameter, self-referential renaming, or unverified self-citation chain; the result is a concrete application rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The factorizability of the operator and the existence of abstract ladder operators are invoked but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5379 in / 1110 out tokens · 23768 ms · 2026-05-08T19:25:58.984477+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references

  1. [1]

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher,Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT- Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243-5246, (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    Bender, A

    C. Bender, A. Fring, U. G¨ uenther, H. Jones Eds,Special issue on quantum physics with non-Hermitian operators, J. Phys. A: Math. and Ther.,45(2012)

    2012

  3. [4]

    C. M. Bender,P TSymmetry In Quantum and Classical Physics, World Scientific Pub- lishing Europe Ltd., London (2019)

    2019

  4. [5]

    Bagarello, J

    F. Bagarello, J. P. Gazeau, F. H. Szafraniec e M. Znojil Eds.,Non-selfadjoint operators in quantum physics: Mathematical aspects, John Wiley and Sons (2015)

    2015

  5. [6]

    Bagarello, R

    F. Bagarello, R. Passante, C. Trapani,Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics; Selected Contributions from the 15th International Conference on Non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians in Quantum Physics, Palermo, Italy, 18-23 May 2015, Springer (2016) 29

    2015

  6. [7]

    Bagarello,Pseudo-Bosons and Their Coherent States, Springer, Mathematical Physics Studies, 2022

    F. Bagarello,Pseudo-Bosons and Their Coherent States, Springer, Mathematical Physics Studies, 2022

    2022

  7. [8]

    Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-hermitian quantum mechanics, Int

    A. Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-hermitian quantum mechanics, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.,7, 1191-1306 (2010)

    2010

  8. [9]

    von Roos,Position-dependent effective masses in semiconductor theory, Phys

    O. von Roos,Position-dependent effective masses in semiconductor theory, Phys. Rev. B, 27, 7547–7552 (1983)

    1983

  9. [10]

    Bagchi, A

    B. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, C. Quesne, V. M. Tkachuk,Deformed shape invariance and exactly solvable Hamiltonians with position-dependent effective mass, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,38, 2929–2945 (2005)

    2005

  10. [11]

    Cruz y Cruz, O

    S. Cruz y Cruz, O. Rosas-Ortiz,Position-dependent mass oscillators and coherent states, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.,42, 185205 (2009)

    2009

  11. [12]

    M. I. Estrada-Delgado, Z. I. Blanco-Garcia,Oscillator Algebra in Complex Position- Dependent Mass Systems, Symmetry,17, 10, 1690 (2025)

    2025

  12. [13]

    D. S. Takou, A. Y. Mora, I. Nonkan´ e, L. M. Lawson, G. Y. H. Avossevou,Gazeau-Klauder coherent states for a harmonic position-dependent mass, J. Comput. Electron.,24, 191 (2025)

    2025

  13. [14]

    Quesne,Semi-infinite quantum wells in a position-dependent mass background, Quan- tum Stud.: Math

    C. Quesne,Semi-infinite quantum wells in a position-dependent mass background, Quan- tum Stud.: Math. Found.10237-244, (2023)

    2023

  14. [15]

    Mustafa, S

    O. Mustafa, S. H. Mazharimousavi,Complexified von Roos Hamiltonian’sη-weak-pseudo- Hermiticity, isospectrality and exact solvability, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41244020 (2008)

    2008

  15. [16]

    Mustafa, S

    O. Mustafa, S. H. Mazharimousavi,First-Order Intertwining Operators with Position De- pendent Mass andη-Weak-Pseudo-Hermiticity Generators, Int J Theor Phys47, 446–454 (2008)

    2008

  16. [17]

    Ballesteros, R

    A. Ballesteros, R. Ram´ ırez, M. Reboiro,Non-standard quantum algebras and infinite- dimensional PT-symmetric systemsJ. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58, 455301 (2025)

    2025

  17. [18]

    F. C. E. Lima, L. N. Monteiro, C. A. S. Almeida,Non-Hermitian fermions with effective mass, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures,150, 115682 (2023) 30

    2023

  18. [19]

    Jia, A de Souza Dutra,Position-dependent effective mass Dirac equations with PT- symmetric and non-PT-symmetric potentials, J

    C.-S. Jia, A de Souza Dutra,Position-dependent effective mass Dirac equations with PT- symmetric and non-PT-symmetric potentials, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.39, 11877–11887 (2006)

    2006

  19. [20]

    F. M. Fernandez,Algebraic treatment of PT-symmetric coupled oscillators, Int. J. Theor. Phys.543871-3876 (2015)

    2015

  20. [21]

    F. M. Fernandez,Symmetric quadratic Hamiltonians with pseudo-Hermitian matrix repre- sentation, Ann. Phys.369, 168-176 (2016)

    2016

  21. [22]

    F. M. Fernandez,Algebraic treatment of non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonians, J. Math. Chem.,58, 2094–2107 (2020)

    2094

  22. [23]

    Bagarello,Abstract ladder operators and their applications, J

    F. Bagarello,Abstract ladder operators and their applications, J. Phys. A,54, 445203 (2021)

    2021

  23. [24]

    Bagarello,Abstract ladder operators for non self-adjoint Hamiltonians, with applica- tions, Ann

    F. Bagarello,Abstract ladder operators for non self-adjoint Hamiltonians, with applica- tions, Ann. of Phys.,468, 169727 (2024)

    2024

  24. [25]

    S. Reed, B. Simon,Methods of modern mathematical physics, Vol I:Functional analysis, Academic, New York (1975)

    1975

  25. [26]

    Barton,Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator potential, Ann

    G. Barton,Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator potential, Ann. of Phys.,166, 322-363 (1986)

    1986

  26. [27]

    Krason, J

    P. Krason, J. Milewski,On eigenproblem for inverted harmonic oscillators, Banach Center Publications,124, 61-73 (2021)

    2021

  27. [28]

    Subramanyan, S

    V. Subramanyan, S. S. Hegde, S. Vishveshwara, B. Bradlyn,Physics of the inverted har- monic oscillator: from the lowest Landau level to event horizons, Ann. of Phys.,435, 168470 (2021)

    2021

  28. [29]

    Sriram Sundaram, C. P. Burgess, D. H. J. O’Dell,Duality between the quantum inverted harmonic oscillator and inverse square potentials, New J. Phys.26(2024) 053023

    2024

  29. [30]

    Fujita, Y

    T. Fujita, Y. Kaku, A. Matsumura, Y. Michimura,Inverted oscillators for testing gravity- induced quantum entanglement, Class. Quantum Grav.42, 165003 (2025)

    2025

  30. [31]

    Bagarello,A Swanson-like Hamiltonian and the inverted harmonic oscillator, J

    F. Bagarello,A Swanson-like Hamiltonian and the inverted harmonic oscillator, J. Phys. A,55. 225204 (2022) 31

    2022

  31. [32]

    Bagarello, E

    F. Bagarello, E. Balistreri, S.Ku˙ zel,An unified approach for the (inverted) quantum har- monic oscillator and the Berry-Keating hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys., submitted

  32. [33]

    Bagarello,Examples of Pseudo-bosons in quantum mechanics, Phys

    F. Bagarello,Examples of Pseudo-bosons in quantum mechanics, Phys. Lett. A,374, 3823- 3827 (2010)

    2010

  33. [34]

    Bagarello,Deformed canonical (anti-)commutation relations and non hermitian Hamil- tonians, in Non-selfadjoint operators in quantum physics: Mathematical aspects, F

    F. Bagarello,Deformed canonical (anti-)commutation relations and non hermitian Hamil- tonians, in Non-selfadjoint operators in quantum physics: Mathematical aspects, F. Bagarello, J. P. Gazeau, F. H. Szafraniec and M. Znojil Eds., Wiley (2015)

    2015

  34. [35]

    Kolmogorov and S

    A. Kolmogorov and S. Fomine,El´ ements de la th´ eorie des fonctions et de l’analyse fonc- tionnelle, Mir (1973) 32

    1973