arxiv: 2605.01921 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Hunting for Bbar B molecular state X_{b0} via radiative transition of Upsilon(10753)

Yuan-Jun Gao , Gang Li , Shi-Dong Liu , Qi Wu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 16:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords radiative decayUpsilon(10753)X_b0B B-bar moleculemeson loopsNREFTbottomoniumexotic hadrons

0 comments

The pith

The Υ(10753) radiatively decays to a photon and the X_b0 BB-bar molecule with a branching fraction of 10^{-6} to 10^{-5}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the rate for the radiative decay Υ(10753) → γ X_b0, where the X_b0 is modeled as a loosely bound molecule of B and anti-B mesons. The Υ(10753) is treated as a mixture of S-wave and D-wave states, and the transition is computed through loops of intermediate B(*) and B1(') mesons using nonrelativistic effective field theory. The results show that P-wave B1(') loops dominate, yielding a partial width of 0.2-1.5 keV for binding energies from 0 to 10 MeV. This corresponds to a branching fraction in the 10^{-6} to 10^{-5} range, independent of the B1' width, and positions the decay as a practical search channel for the X_b0.

Core claim

Within the nonrelativistic effective field theory framework, treating the Υ(10753) as an S-D mixed state and the X_b0 as a weakly bound B B-bar molecule with J^{PC}=0^{++}, the radiative decay Υ(10753) → γ X_b0 proceeds via intermediate meson loops involving S-wave B(*) and P-wave B1(') mesons; the process is dominated by the B1(') loops, producing a partial decay width of 0.2-1.5 keV for binding energy ε_X = 0-10 MeV and a branching fraction of 10^{-6}-10^{-5}, insensitive to the full width of the B1' meson.

What carries the argument

Intermediate meson loops of S-wave B(*) and P-wave B1(') mesons in nonrelativistic effective field theory, combined with S-D mixing of the Υ(10753).

If this is right

The B1(') meson loops dominate the decay amplitude.
The predicted width is insensitive to the full width of the B1' meson.
The radiative decay provides a promising experimental channel to search for the X_b0.
Confirmation would test heavy-quark symmetries and clarify the bottom-sector exotic spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A positive signal would favor molecular interpretations of X_b0 over compact tetraquark or other exotic assignments.
Similar loop calculations could be applied to radiative transitions from other excited bottomonium states to map additional molecular candidates.
Belle II data on Υ(10753) decays could set the first limits or measure the binding energy through the photon energy spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The X_b0 exists as a weakly bound BB-bar molecule with J^{PC}=0++ and the decay occurs through the assumed S-D mixing of the Υ(10753) plus the specified intermediate meson loops.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement finding the branching fraction for Υ(10753) → γ X_b0 either far below 10^{-6} or consistent with zero at the luminosity needed to probe 10^{-5} would contradict the predicted rate under the molecular and loop assumptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01921 by Gang Li, Qi Wu, Shi-Dong Liu, Yuan-Jun Gao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for Υ(10753) view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Feynman diagrams for Υ(10753) view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Partial widths of the radiative decay Υ(10753) view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of the partial width as a function of the view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the radiative decay $\Upsilon(10753) \to \gamma X_{b0}$ within the framework of nonrelativistic effective field theory (NREFT). The $\Upsilon(10753)$ is treated as an $S$-$D$ mixed state of the $\Upsilon(4S)$ and $\YD$, while the $X_{b0}$ is interpreted as a weakly bound $B\bar{B}$ molecule with $J^{PC}=0^{++}$. The decay process was assumed to occur via the intermediate meson loops involving the $S$-wave $B^{(*)}$ and $P$-wave $B_1^{(\prime)}$ mesons. Our calculated results indicate that the decay $\Upsilon(10753) \to \gamma X_{b0}$ is dominated by the $B_1^{(\prime)}$ meson loops. The partial decay width is predicted to be $0.2-1.5~\mathrm{keV}$ for a binding energy range of $\epsilon_X=0-10~\mathrm{MeV}$, corresponding to a branching fraction of $10^{-6}-10^{-5}$. The decay width is found to be insensitive to the full width of the $B_1^{\prime}$ meson. Our study suggests that the radiative decay of the $\Upsilon(10753)$ is a promising channel to search for the $X_{b0}$ state, which is crucial for testing heavy-quark symmetries and understanding the exotic hadron spectrum in the bottom sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper supplies a concrete width prediction for Υ(10753) → γ X_b0 under the molecular hypothesis, but the number largely follows from the scanned binding energy.

read the letter

The central result is a partial width of 0.2-1.5 keV for the radiative decay, with the B1(') loops providing the main contribution and the width staying stable against changes in the B1' total width. The branching fraction sits in the 10^{-6} to 10^{-5} ballpark for binding energies from 0 to 10 MeV. The work applies the established NREFT meson-loop machinery, already used in charmonium studies, to this bottom-sector channel while treating the initial state as an S-D mixture. That produces a specific, falsifiable number that experimental groups can use to plan searches. The calculation is internally consistent within its stated assumptions and includes one limited robustness check. The main limitation is that the quoted interval is generated by varying the binding energy input rather than deriving it. The result therefore stands or falls with the molecular interpretation of X_b0 and the choice of that parameter range. No direct comparison appears to non-molecular mechanisms or to other decay topologies, and the paper does not quantify how well the loop approximation holds across the full energy window. This is useful reading for theorists who already work with molecular assignments for heavy exotics and want a ready estimate for bottomonium radiative channels. A reader looking for model-independent statements or new data will find less value. The calculation is grounded enough in a standard framework and produces an experimentally accessible number, so it merits peer review rather than desk rejection. Referees can then judge whether the parameter choices and loop treatment are reasonable given the assumptions.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the radiative decay Υ(10753) → γ X_b0 in nonrelativistic effective field theory (NREFT). The Υ(10753) is modeled as an S-D mixed state of Υ(4S) and Υ(3D), while X_b0 is taken as a weakly bound B B-bar molecule with J^PC=0++. The decay is assumed to proceed via intermediate loops involving S-wave B(*) and P-wave B1(') mesons. Numerical results indicate dominance by the B1(') loops, yielding a partial width of 0.2-1.5 keV (branching fraction 10^{-6}-10^{-5}) for binding energies ε_X = 0-10 MeV. The width is reported insensitive to the B1' full width, and the channel is proposed as promising for experimental searches of X_b0.

Significance. If the molecular interpretation of X_b0 and the NREFT loop mechanism hold, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the branching fraction that could guide searches at Belle II or LHCb and test heavy-quark symmetry relations in the bottom sector. The explicit robustness check against variation of the B1' width is a positive feature within the model framework.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and numerical results] Abstract and numerical results: the quoted partial-width interval 0.2-1.5 keV is generated by direct variation of the input binding energy ε_X over 0-10 MeV. Because ε_X is a free parameter fixed by the molecular assumption, the output range is not an independent derivation but a direct reflection of the chosen input interval; this limits the predictive power of the central claim.

minor comments (3)

The abstract and introduction should state all model assumptions (S-D mixing coefficients, cutoff scheme, loop regularization) more explicitly at the outset to improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with the NREFT framework.
Notation such as ΥD in the abstract is undefined; it should be written out (presumably Υ(3D)) on first use.
A table or figure panel breaking down the separate contributions of the B, B*, B1, and B1' loops would make the dominance statement quantitative and easier to verify.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comment. We address the major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and numerical results] Abstract and numerical results: the quoted partial-width interval 0.2-1.5 keV is generated by direct variation of the input binding energy ε_X over 0-10 MeV. Because ε_X is a free parameter fixed by the molecular assumption, the output range is not an independent derivation but a direct reflection of the chosen input interval; this limits the predictive power of the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the quoted interval 0.2-1.5 keV is obtained by direct variation of the input parameter ε_X over the range 0-10 MeV, which is chosen on the basis of the molecular interpretation of X_b0 as a shallow bound state. This variation is performed to exhibit the dependence of the partial width on the binding energy within the phenomenologically expected window. While we acknowledge that the result is therefore not a parameter-free prediction, the calculation still supplies a concrete, model-dependent estimate that can be confronted with experiment once the binding energy is better constrained or measured. We will revise the abstract and the discussion of numerical results to state explicitly that the reported range corresponds to this variation of ε_X, thereby clarifying the nature of the prediction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; width range is explicit parameter scan

full rationale

The paper computes the radiative decay width in NREFT under the stated molecular and mixing assumptions, with the binding energy ε_X scanned over 0-10 MeV to produce the quoted 0.2-1.5 keV interval. This is a transparent model output conditional on the input range rather than a reduction by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The result remains self-contained as a conditional prediction within the chosen framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central prediction rests on the molecular interpretation of X_b0, the S-D mixing ansatz for Υ(10753), and the dominance of specific meson loops; these are introduced without independent experimental anchors in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

binding energy ε_X = 0-10 MeV
Scanned from 0 to 10 MeV to produce the quoted width interval; directly controls the molecular binding and therefore the decay rate.
S-D mixing angle or coefficients for Υ(10753)
Assumed to treat Υ(10753) as mixture of Υ(4S) and ΥD; value not specified in abstract but required for the amplitude.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Nonrelativistic effective field theory applies to the radiative transition via intermediate B(*) and B1(') meson loops
Invoked to justify the loop calculation and the dominance of B1(') contributions.
domain assumption X_b0 is a weakly bound B B-bar molecule with J^PC = 0++
Core interpretation that defines the final state and enables the molecular loop mechanism.

invented entities (1)

X_b0 as B B-bar molecule no independent evidence
purpose: To interpret the exotic state and compute its production via radiative decay
Postulated on the basis of analogy with other exotics; no independent mass or width measurement is cited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1612 out tokens · 56081 ms · 2026-05-09T16:27:22.074219+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

[1]

It is seen that the radiative decay width exhibits only a weak dependence on the width of theB ′
[2]

The decay width first increases and then decreases with the increase of theB ′ 1 width and reach their maximum around ΓB′ 1 ≃35 MeV

Within the considered range, its variation falls into 1.02–1.12 keV. The decay width first increases and then decreases with the increase of theB ′ 1 width and reach their maximum around ΓB′ 1 ≃35 MeV. It should be noted that the pos- sible variation of the couplings resulting from the change of theB (′) 1 width is not considered in our calculations, whic...
[3]

Navas et al

S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[4]

Godfrey and S

S. Godfrey and S. L. Olsen, The ExoticXY Z Charmonium-Like Mesons, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.58, 51 (2008), arXiv:0801.3867 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[5]

Liu, An overview ofXY Znew particles, Chin

X. Liu, An overview ofXY Znew particles, Chin. Sci. Bull.59, 3815 (2014), arXiv:1312.7408 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[6]

R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy- Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.93, 143 (2017), arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[7]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Brambilla, S

N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical sta- tus and perspectives, Phys. Rept.873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), Observation of a Narrow Char- moniumlike State in ExclusiveB ± →K ±π+π−J/ψDe- cays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0309032

work page arXiv 2003
[11]

Aaij et al

R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Determination of theX(3872) Meson Quantum Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 222001 (2013), arXiv:1302.6269 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2013
[12]

Hou, Searching for the bottom counterparts of X(3872) andY(4260) viaπ +π−Υ, Phys

W.-S. Hou, Searching for the bottom counterparts of X(3872) andY(4260) viaπ +π−Υ, Phys. Rev. D74, 017504 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606016

work page arXiv 2006
[13]

Ozpineci, C

A. Ozpineci, C. W. Xiao, and E. Oset, Hidden beauty molecules within the local hidden gauge approach and heavy quark spin symmetry, Phys. Rev. D88, 034018 (2013), arXiv:1306.3154 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[14]

Yang, Z.-Y

Y.-C. Yang, Z.-Y. Tan, J. Ping, and H.-S. Zong, Possible D(∗) ¯D(∗) andB (∗) ¯B(∗) molecular states in the extended constituent quark models, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 575 (2017), arXiv:1703.09718 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[15]

Ding, H.-Y

Z.-M. Ding, H.-Y. Jiang, and J. He, Molecular states from D(∗) ¯D(∗)/B(∗) ¯B(∗) andD (∗)D(∗)/ ¯B(∗) ¯B(∗) interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1179 (2020), arXiv:2011.04980 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Zhao, Z.-Y

M.-J. Zhao, Z.-Y. Wang, C. Wang, and X.-H. Guo, In- vestigation of the possibleD ¯D∗/B ¯B∗ andDD ∗/ ¯B ¯B∗ bound states, Phys. Rev. D105, 096016 (2022), arXiv:2112.12633 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Chatrchyan et al

S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Search for a new bot- tomonium state decaying to Υ(1S)π +π− in pp colli- sions at √s= 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B727, 57 (2013), arXiv:1309.0250 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2013
[18]

Aad et al

G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Search for theX b and other hidden-beauty states in theπ +π−Υ(1S) channel at AT- LAS, Phys. Lett. B740, 199 (2015), arXiv:1410.4409 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[19]

Guo, U.-G

F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, W. Wang, and Z. Yang, Pro- duction of the bottom analogs and the spin partner of theX(3872) at hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3063 (2014), arXiv:1402.6236 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[20]

Li and W

G. Li and W. Wang, Hunting for theX b via radiative decays, Phys. Lett. B733, 100 (2014), arXiv:1402.6463 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[21]

Li and Z

G. Li and Z. Zhou, Hunting for theX b via hidden bottomonium decays, Phys. Rev. D91, 034020 (2015), arXiv:1502.02936 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

X. H. He et al. (Belle), Observation ofe +e− → π+π−π0χbJ and Search forX b →ωΥ(1S) at √s= 10.867 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 142001 (2014), arXiv:1408.0504 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[23]

Adachi et al

I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Observation ofe +e− → ωχbJ(1P) and Search forX b →ωΥ(1S) at √snear 10.75 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091902 (2023), arXiv:2208.13189 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Jia, Z.-H

Z.-S. Jia, Z.-H. Zhang, W.-H. Qin, and G. Li, Hunting for Xb via hidden bottomonium decaysX b →ππχ bJ, Phys. Rev. D109, 034017 (2024), arXiv:2311.15527 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Wang, Z.-X

X.-Y. Wang, Z.-X. Cai, G. Li, S.-D. Liu, C.-S. An, and J.- 9 J. Xie, Production ofX b via Υ(5S,6S) radiative decays, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 186 (2023), arXiv:2301.07365 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Liu, H.-D

S.-D. Liu, H.-D. Cai, Z.-X. Cai, H.-S. Gao, G. Li, F. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Production ofX b via radiative transition of Υ(10753), Phys. Rev. D109, 094045 (2024), arXiv:2403.01676 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Adachi et al

I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Observation ofe +e− → ηΥ(2S) and search fore +e− →ηΥ(1S),γX b at √s near 10.75 GeV, Phys. Rev. D113, L051102 (2026), arXiv:2509.01917 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[28]

N. A. Tornqvist, From the deuteron to deusons, an anal- ysis of deuteronlike meson-meson bound states, Z. Phys. C61, 525 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9310247

work page arXiv 1994
[29]

Ebert, R

D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Masses of heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Lett. B634, 214 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512230

work page arXiv 2006
[30]

R. D. Matheus, S. Narison, M. Nielsen, and J. M. Richard, Can theX(3872) be a 1 ++ four-quark state?, Phys. Rev. D75, 014005 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608297

work page arXiv 2007
[31]

A. Ali, C. Hambrock, I. Ahmed, and M. J. Aslam, A case for hiddenb ¯btetraquarks based one +e− →b ¯bcross section between √s= 10.54 and 11.20 GeV, Phys. Lett. B684, 28 (2010), arXiv:0911.2787 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[32]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Consequences of heavy-quark symmetries for hadronic molecules, Phys. Rev. D88, 054007 (2013), arXiv:1303.6608 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[33]

Aushev et al., Physics at Super B Factory, (2010), arXiv:1002.5012 [hep-ex]

T. Aushev et al., Physics at Super B Factory, (2010), arXiv:1002.5012 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2010
[34]

Ablikim et al

M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation ofe +e− → γX(3872) at BESIII, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 092001 (2014), arXiv:1310.4101 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[35]

Ke, X.-Q

H.-W. Ke, X.-Q. Li, Y.-L. Shi, G.-L. Wang, and X.-H. Yuan, IsZ b(10610) a molecular state?, JHEP04, 056, arXiv:1202.2178 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[36]

Liu and Z.-Y

Y.-R. Liu and Z.-Y. Zhang, Bound state problem ofS- wave heavy quark meson-aitimeson systems, Phys. Rev. C80, 015208 (2009), arXiv:0810.1598 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[37]

M. T. Li, W. L. Wang, Y. B. Dong, and Z. Y. Zhang, PossibleD ¯DAndB ¯BMolecular States In A Chiral Quark Model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A27, 1250161 (2012), arXiv:1206.0523 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[38]

A. L. M. Britto and L. M. Abreu, Production of aB ¯B bound state via Υ(4S) radiative decays, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056008 (2024), arXiv:2406.03289 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Production of theX(3872) in charmo- nia radiative decays, Phys. Lett. B725, 127 (2013), arXiv:1306.3096 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[40]

Mizuk et al

R. Mizuk et al. (Belle), Observation of a new structure near 10.75 GeV in the energy dependence of thee +e− → Υ(nS)π +π−(n= 1,2,3) cross sections, JHEP10, 220, arXiv:1905.05521 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 1905
[41]

Li, Z.-Y

Y.-S. Li, Z.-Y. Bai, Q. Huang, and X. Liu, Hidden- bottom hadronic decays of Υ(10753) with aη (′) orωemission, Phys. Rev. D104, 034036 (2021), arXiv:2106.14123 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

Li, Z.-Y

Y.-S. Li, Z.-Y. Bai, and X. Liu, Investigating the Υ(10753)→Υ(1 3DJ)ηtransitions, Phys. Rev. D105, 114041 (2022), arXiv:2205.04049 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Bai, Y.-S

Z.-Y. Bai, Y.-S. Li, Q. Huang, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Υ(10753)→Υ(nS)π +π− decays induced by hadronic loop mechanism, Phys. Rev. D105, 074007 (2022), arXiv:2201.12715 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Adachi et al

I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Search for thee +e− →η b(1S)ω ande +e→χb0(1P)ωprocesses at √s= 10.745 GeV, Phys. Rev. D109, 072013 (2024), arXiv:2312.13043 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

B. Chen, A. Zhang, and J. He, Bottomonium spectrum in the relativistic flux tube model, Phys. Rev. D101, 014020 (2020), arXiv:1910.06065 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[46]

Wang, Vector hidden-bottom tetraquark candi- date:Y(10750), Chin

Z.-G. Wang, Vector hidden-bottom tetraquark candi- date:Y(10750), Chin. Phys. C43, 123102 (2019), arXiv:1905.06610 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

A. Ali, L. Maiani, A. Y. Parkhomenko, and W. Wang, Interpretation ofY b(10753) as a tetraquark and its pro- duction mechanism, Phys. Lett. B802, 135217 (2020), arXiv:1910.07671 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

Tarr´ us Castell` a, Spin structure of heavy-quark hybrids, AIP Conf

J. Tarr´ us Castell` a, Spin structure of heavy-quark hybrids, AIP Conf. Proc.2249, 020008 (2020), arXiv:1908.05179 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

A. M. Badalian, B. L. G. Bakker, and I. V. Danilkin, Possibility to observe highern 3D1 bottomonium states in thee +e− processes, Phys. Rev. D79, 037505 (2009), arXiv:0812.2136 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[50]

A. M. Badalian, B. L. G. Bakker, and I. V. Danilkin, Di- electron widths of theS-,D-vector bottomonium states, Phys. Atom. Nucl.73, 138 (2010), arXiv:0903.3643 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[51]

Godfrey and K

S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Bottomonium mesons and strategies for their observation, Phys. Rev. D92, 054034 (2015), arXiv:1507.00024 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[52]

Segovia, P

J. Segovia, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fern´ andez, Bottomonium spectrum revisited, Phys. Rev. D93, 074027 (2016), arXiv:1601.05093 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[53]

Wang, Z.-F

J.-Z. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Higher bottomonium zoo, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 915 (2018), arXiv:1802.04938 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[54]

Li, M.-S

Q. Li, M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. L¨ u, L.-C. Gui, and X.-H. Zhong, Canonical interpretation ofY(10750) and Υ(10860) in the Υ family, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 59 (2020), arXiv:1905.10344 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[55]

R.-H. Ni, Q. Deng, J.-J. Wu, and X.-H. Zhong, Bottomo- nia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D111, 114027 (2025), arXiv:2501.15110 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Luo, Y.-L

Z.-L. Luo, Y.-L. Song, and F.-K. Guo, Decays of Υ(10860) and Υ(10753) intoωχ bJ, Phys. Lett. B870, 139960 (2025), arXiv:2508.18720 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and A. V. Nefediev, Spin partners of the Z b (10610) and Zb (10650) revisited, JHEP06, 158, arXiv:1704.07332 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[58]

Liang, N

W.-H. Liang, N. Ikeno, and E. Oset, Υ(nl) decay intoB (∗) ¯B(∗), Phys. Lett. B803, 135340 (2020), arXiv:1912.03053 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[59]

Phenomenology of Heavy Meson Chiral Lagrangians

R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Rept.281, 145 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9605342

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[60]

Hu and T

J. Hu and T. Mehen, Chiral Lagrangian with heavy quark-diquark symmetry, Phys. Rev. D73, 054003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0511321

work page arXiv 2006
[61]

Gao, Z.-X

H.-S. Gao, Z.-X. Cai, G. Li, and S.-D. Liu, Light Hadronic Decays of Spin-0 Partner ofX(3872), Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 100201 (2025), arXiv:2508.01536 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Weinberg, Evidence That the Deuteron Is Not an El- 10 ementary Particle, Phys

S. Weinberg, Evidence That the Deuteron Is Not an El- 10 ementary Particle, Phys. Rev.137, B672 (1965)

1965
[63]

V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Y. Kalashnikova, and A. E. Kudryavtsev, Evidence that thea 0(980) and f0(980) are not elementary particles, Phys. Lett. B586, 53 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0308129

work page arXiv 2004
[64]

J. F. Amundson, C. G. Boyd, E. E. Jenkins, M. E. Luke, A. V. Manohar, J. L. Rosner, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Radiative D* decay using heavy quark and chi- ral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B296, 415 (1992), arXiv:hep- ph/9209241

work page arXiv 1992
[65]

Asghar, B

I. Asghar, B. Masud, E. S. Swanson, F. Akram, and M. Atif Sultan, Decays and spectrum of bottom and bot- tom strange mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A54, 127 (2018), arXiv:1804.08802 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[66]

Zhu, W.-Y

S.-L. Zhu, W.-Y. P. Hwang, and Z.-s. Yang,D ∗ →Dγ andB ∗ →Bγas Derived from QCD Sum Rules, Mod. Phys. Lett. A12, 3027 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9610412

work page arXiv 1997
[67]

Choi, Decay constants and radiative decays of heavy mesons in light-front quark model, Phys

H.-M. Choi, Decay constants and radiative decays of heavy mesons in light-front quark model, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073016 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701263

work page arXiv 2007
[68]

M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fern´ andez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nieves, and D.- L. Yao, Towards a new paradigm for heavy-light me- son spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D98, 094018 (2018), arXiv:1712.07957 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[69]

Wu, D.-Y

Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen, and F.-K. Guo, Production of the Z (′) b states from the Υ(5S,6S) decays, Phys. Rev. D99, 034022 (2019), arXiv:1810.09696 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[70]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Effect of charmed meson loops on charmo- nium transitions, Phys. Rev. D83, 034013 (2011), arXiv:1008.3632 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[71]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Novel analysis of the decaysψ ′ →h cπ0 andη ′ c →χ c0π0, Phys. Rev. D82, 034025 (2010), arXiv:1002.2712 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[72]

Guo and U.-G

F.-K. Guo and U.-G. Meißner, Light Quark Mass Depen- dence in Heavy Quarkonium Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 062001 (2012), arXiv:1203.1116 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012