pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01955 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On the Dust Substructures Triggered by Two Super-Earths Migrating in Low-viscosity Disks

Zijia Cui , Ewa Szuszkiewicz
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords dust substructuressuper-Earth migrationprotoplanetary disksplanetesimal formation2:1 resonancelow-viscosity disksdust feedbackplanetary commensurability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two super-Earths migrating near a 2:1 resonance in a low-viscosity disk accumulate dust into a narrow ring between their orbits and a broad, time-evolving multiple-ring structure outside the outer planet, with local dust-to-gas ratios often

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how two super-Earths, migrating while staying close to a 2:1 orbital commensurability in a low-viscosity protoplanetary disk, shape the distribution of dust particles of different sizes. Two-dimensional two-fluid simulations that include dust feedback and diffusion reveal strong dust accumulation in two distinct zones, producing dust-to-gas ratios near or above one for larger grains. These concentrations matter because they mark locations where dust may clump into planetesimals, the building blocks of new planets. The work also tracks how the dust back-reacts on the planets, altering migration speeds, resonance capture, and the stability of the commensurability itself.

Core claim

In two-dimensional two-fluid hydrodynamic simulations of two super-Earths migrating in a low-viscosity disk near 2:1 commensurability, using single-size dust grains from submillimeter to centimeter scales together with dust feedback and diffusion, significant particle accumulation occurs in a narrow dust ring located between the two planetary orbits and in a broad feature outside the orbit of the outer planet that develops over time into multiple ring substructures, reaching dust-to-gas ratios close to or exceeding unity for the largest grains examined.

What carries the argument

Two-dimensional two-fluid hydrodynamic simulations that incorporate dust feedback and diffusion for single-size grains while the planets migrate near 2:1 commensurability.

If this is right

  • The two identified dust concentrations are favorable sites for planetesimal formation.
  • Dust feedback modifies the rate of planetary migration and the stability of the 2:1 commensurability.
  • The broad outer dust feature evolves temporally into a multiple-ring substructure.
  • The outcome of resonance passage and libration overstability can be altered by the presence of dust.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These specific dust-ring patterns could be searched for in ALMA images of disks that host pairs of planets with near-resonant orbits.
  • If planetesimals form at these sites, the resulting debris might later influence the final spacing and masses of the observed planets.
  • Varying the disk viscosity or dust size distribution in follow-up simulations would test how robust the two accumulation zones remain.
  • Vertical settling in three dimensions could further increase the local dust densities beyond the values found in the 2D runs.

Load-bearing premise

Two-dimensional simulations that treat one dust grain size at a time with included diffusion and feedback can accurately represent the three-dimensional behavior of disks containing a full range of particle sizes.

What would settle it

High-resolution submillimeter observations of a protoplanetary disk containing two planets near 2:1 orbital spacing that show dust-to-gas ratios remaining well below one in both the inter-planet region and the zone exterior to the outer planet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01955 by Ewa Szuszkiewicz, Zijia Cui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the semi-major axis of the planet in a purely gaseous disk and in the disks of gas and dust with different sd. The top and bottom panels show the results of the simulations for the planet of q = 1.5 × 10−5 with rp,0 = 1.23 and q = 3 × 10−5 with rp,0 = 2.0, respectively. The legend to the top panel applies also to the bottom one. The red line in each panel represents the Type I migration calcul… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The relevant gas and dust surface density Σg/Σg−e, Σd/Σd−e around the planet at t = 5000 orbits in the simulations for a single planet with various sd and in the gas case. The description of lines are the same in both panels. The dashed red vertical line in each panel indicates the position of the planet. The dashed light blue horizontal line represents the unperturbed background surface density. a very sh… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: From left to right: contour plots of Σd in the vicinity of the planet in the disk with sd = 0.01 cm, 0.1 cm, 1 cm, 2 cm and 4 cm at t = 5000 orbits. Top panels show the cases of q = 1.5 × 10−5 with rp,0 = 1.23 while bottom panels show the cases of q = 3.0 × 10−5 with rp,0 = 2.0. The planet is located in the center of each panel. comparison between the sd = 2 and sd = 4 cm cases. Moreover, the dust-void is … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: From left to right: Evolution of the period ratios, semi-major axes and eccentricities of two planets in the purely gaseous disk and in the disks of gas and dust with different sd. In the middle and right panels we show the most relevant part of the evolution, omitting the first 5000 orbits during which no significant differences can be seen. The viscous parameter α0 is taken to be 10−5 . The horizontal da… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top and middle: azimuthally averaged gas and dust surface density as a function of r at t = 8000 and 10000 orbits in the simulations with various sd, which are indicated respectively by the red and black lines in each panel. Bottom: the quantity d ln P/d ln r at t = 8000 and 10000 orbits in each case. The violet dashed line in the top panel denotes Σg at t = 10000 orbits in the gas case. The dashed light b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The gas torque acting on the inner and outer planets as a function of time in the cases with various sd and in the gas case. The orange and violet dashed vertical lines have the same meaning as in view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The total torque, the gas torque and the dust torque acting on the inner (top panel) and outer (bottom panel) planets as a function of time in the simulations with different sd. The pink dashed vertical lines in the panels for sd = 1, 2 and 4 cm indicate the moments when ϵ at the peak of the dust ring between planets exceeds unity. The blue dashed vertical lines represent the moments when the occurrence of… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The dust torques from different parts of the disk acting on the outer planet in the simulations with sd = 2 cm (top panel) and 4 cm (bottom panel). See text for more details. The orange dashed line has the same meaning as in view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The contour plots of Σd in the vicinity of the outer planet at t = 13000, 15000 and 18000 orbits in the sd = 2 cm case (top panels) and the sd = 4 cm case (bottom panels). We find that in the sd = 2 cm case (top panels), the dust void on the left side of the planet at t = 13000 orbits is small, much smaller compared to its size at the earlier times of the evolution (not shown in the fig￾ure). As the calcu… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Evolution of the period ratios (P2/P1), the semi-major axes (a1, a2) and eccentricities (e1, e2) of two planets in the purely gaseous disk and in the disks of gas and dust with different sd. For the semi-major axes and eccentricities we show the most relevant part of the evolution, omitting the first 5000 orbits during which no significant differences can be seen. The viscous parameter α0 is taken to be 1… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top and middle: The azimuthally averaged gas and dust surface density of the disk in the simulations of the gas case and the cases with various sd at t = 18000 orbits. Bottom: the quantity d ln P/d ln r at t = 18000 orbits. The dashed light blue horizontal line denotes the initial value of the logarithmic pressure gradient and the orange dashed line shows where this quantity is equal zero. The viscous par… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The contour plots of dust surface density Σd in the simulations with various sd and two values of the viscosity parameter α0: 10−5 (at 10000 orbits - upper panel and at 18000 orbits - middle panel) and 10−3 (at 18000 orbits - lower panel). From left to right sd is taken to be 0.01, 0.1, 1, 2 and 4 cm, respectively. The green circles denote the positions of two planets. not completed yet. In the disk with … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The multi-planetary systems which contain two planets outside the 2:1 MMR (orange) chosen to illustrate the possibility to form two additional planets in the sand￾wiched (blue) and sequential (violet) planet formation sce￾narios. The size of the circles represents the planetary mass obtained from NASA Exoplanet Archive. The red vertical lines indicate the position of the 2:1 MMR relative to the inner oran… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The total dust mass in the computational domain of the simulations with different sd as a function of time. The solid and dashed lines indicate the results obtained with α0 = 10−5 and 10−3 , respectively. The evolution of Md for the disks with 0.01 and 0.1 cm grains is very similar, so the green and cyan lines practically overlap each other. B. THE EFFECTS OF THE NUMERICAL RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN THE SIMULA… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: From top to bottom: The evolution of the semi-major axis of a single planet with q = 1.5 × 10−5 and r0 = 1.23, the gas and dust surface density as a function of r/rp at t = 1000 orbits in the simulations with the resolution of 1024 × 700 and 2048 × 1400 for different sd. The dashed vertical light blue line in the middle and the bottom panels indicates the position of the planet. two adopted resolutions ar… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Left: Stokes number at the location of two planets as a function of time in the simulations with sd = 2 cm and sd = 4 cm. The viscous parameter α = 10−5 . The empty and solid circles denote the St number at the positions of the inner planet and outer planet in each case, respectively. Right: Stokes number as a function of r in the simulations with different sd at t = 0 and 18000 orbits, which are indicate… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate dust substructure formation induced by two super-Earths migrating in a low-viscosity disk with single-size dust grains selected from the submillimeter to centimeter range of sizes. The orbital evolution of planets takes place in the vicinity of the 2:1 commensurability, which allows to determine, in addition to the dust substructure properties, the dust impact on the rate of migration, the resonance capture, the libration overstability and the outcome of passage through the commensurability. Using two-dimensional two-fluid hydrodynamic simulations with dust feedback and dust diffusion taken into account, we identify two specific regions in the disk where the accumulation of dust particles is significant, leading to dust substructure formation with the dust-to-gas ratio values close to or even higher than 1 for large grains. The first region, with a narrow dust ring, is located between the planetary orbits and the second one, with a broad feature, evolving in time in a multiple ring substructure, is situated outside the orbit of the outer planet. Our results indicate that these two locations are favorable for planetesimal formation. We discuss the properties of the dust substructures formed in our simulations and outline possible consequences of their evolution for the observed architectures of multi-planetary systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents 2D two-fluid hydrodynamic simulations of two super-Earths migrating near the 2:1 commensurability in a low-viscosity protoplanetary disk, incorporating single-size dust grains (submillimeter to centimeter), dust feedback, and diffusion. It identifies two dust accumulation regions—a narrow ring between the planetary orbits and a broad, time-evolving multiple-ring feature outside the outer planet—where dust-to-gas ratios reach or exceed unity for larger grains, concluding these sites are favorable for planetesimal formation. The work also examines dust effects on migration rates, resonance capture, libration overstability, and passage through the commensurability.

Significance. If the numerical findings hold, the results offer concrete predictions for dust substructures induced by migrating planets in low-viscosity disks, with direct implications for planetesimal formation and the architectures of observed multi-planet systems. The inclusion of dust feedback on migration and resonance dynamics adds value beyond static planet cases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods section: The setup description provides no grid resolution, convergence tests, or validation against analytic limits (e.g., dust trapping in fixed-planet cases). This is load-bearing because the central claims of dust-to-gas ratios ≳1 and specific substructure morphologies rest entirely on these unverified runs.
  2. [Results] Results section (discussion of 2D two-fluid runs): The single-size dust treatment omits vertical settling (which concentrates large grains near the midplane in 3D) and coagulation/fragmentation (which alters effective diffusion and feedback). A minimal test—e.g., one 3D or multi-size comparison run near 2:1—would be required to confirm that the reported narrow inter-planet ring and outer broad feature persist.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'single-size dust grains selected from the submillimeter to centimeter range' should list the exact sizes simulated and the criterion for selection to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several panels showing dust surface density lack explicit color-bar scales or time stamps, making it hard to track the evolution of the outer multiple-ring feature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work and for the constructive major comments. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns on numerical details and model limitations. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical Methods section: The setup description provides no grid resolution, convergence tests, or validation against analytic limits (e.g., dust trapping in fixed-planet cases). This is load-bearing because the central claims of dust-to-gas ratios ≳1 and specific substructure morphologies rest entirely on these unverified runs.

    Authors: We agree that these details are essential. We have updated the Numerical Methods section to specify the grid resolution employed. We have also added a discussion of convergence, based on resolution studies performed as part of the project, showing that the dust substructures and dust-to-gas ratios remain consistent. In addition, we have included a brief validation against the expected dust trapping behavior for fixed planets, which matches analytic predictions for pressure bumps. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section (discussion of 2D two-fluid runs): The single-size dust treatment omits vertical settling (which concentrates large grains near the midplane in 3D) and coagulation/fragmentation (which alters effective diffusion and feedback). A minimal test—e.g., one 3D or multi-size comparison run near 2:1—would be required to confirm that the reported narrow inter-planet ring and outer broad feature persist.

    Authors: We acknowledge the limitations of the 2D single-size dust model, including the absence of vertical settling and grain evolution processes. We have expanded the discussion in the revised Results section to explicitly address these caveats and their possible influence on quantitative dust-to-gas ratios. While we agree that 3D or multi-size runs would provide additional confirmation, such simulations are computationally intensive and lie outside the scope of the present study. We maintain that the qualitative locations of the narrow inter-planet ring and broad outer feature are robust, being driven primarily by the gas dynamics and planetary perturbations captured in our two-fluid runs, and we have added references to related 3D work for context. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of stated 2D hydrodynamic simulations

full rationale

The paper presents results from two-dimensional two-fluid hydrodynamic simulations with dust feedback and diffusion for single-size grains. The identified dust accumulation regions (narrow ring between planets, broad evolving feature outside outer planet) with dust-to-gas ratios ≳1 are reported as simulation outcomes, not derived via equations that reduce to inputs by construction. No self-definitional relations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or method description. The work is self-contained against its numerical benchmarks with explicitly stated physics; external 3D/multi-grain concerns are separate from circularity analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger extracted from abstract description of simulation setup; many numerical choices remain implicit.

free parameters (3)
  • disk viscosity
    Chosen in the low-viscosity regime to enable migration and resonance dynamics
  • dust grain size
    Single size selected from submillimeter to centimeter range for each run
  • planet masses
    Two planets in the super-Earth mass range
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dust treated as a pressureless fluid in 2D hydrodynamics
    Two-fluid simulations with dust feedback and diffusion
  • domain assumption Orbital evolution occurs near 2:1 commensurability
    Planets migrate in the vicinity of 2:1 resonance

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1430 out tokens · 44316 ms · 2026-05-08T19:29:15.474349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024, A&A, 686, 277, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348826

    Afkanpour , Z., Ataiee , S., Ziampras , A., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, 277, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348826

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348826 2024

  2. [2]

    2015 , pages =

    ALMA Partnership , Brogan , C., P \'e rez , L., et al. 2015, , 808, L3, 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L3

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/l3 2015

  3. [3]

    Andrews , S. M. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 483, 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302 2020

  4. [4]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Andrews , S. M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L., et al. 2018, , 869, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Auddy , S., Dey , R., Lin , M. K., Carrera , D., & Simon , J. B. 2022, , 936, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a3c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a3c 2022

  6. [6]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Bae , J., Isella , A., Zhu , Z., et al. 2023, Protostars and Planets VII, ASP Conference Series, 534, 423, 10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13314 2023

  7. [7]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Baruteau , C., & Masset , F. 2008, , 678, 483, 10.1086/529487

    work page doi:10.1086/529487 2008

  8. [8]

    2024, , 167, 70, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1330

    Beard , C., Robertson , P., Dai , F., et al. 2024, , 167, 70, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1330

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad1330 2024

  9. [9]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Benisty , M., Dominik , C., Follette , K., et al. 2023, Protostars and Planets VII, ASP Conference Series, 534, 605, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09991 2023

  10. [10]

    2019, , 241, 25, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab0a0e

    Ben \'i tez-Llambay , P., Krapp , L., & Pessah , M. 2019, , 241, 25, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab0a0e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab0a0e 2019

  11. [11]

    arXiv , author =:1801.07913 , journal =

    Ben \'i tez-Llambay , P., & Pessah , M. 2018, , 855, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ae

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ae 2018

  12. [12]

    2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 Cañas, M

    Birnstiel , T. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 2024

  13. [13]

    B., Li, R., Kretke, K

    Carrera , D., Simon , J., Li , R., Kretke , K., & Klahr , H. 2021, , 161, 96, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd4d9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd4d9 2021

  14. [14]

    2025, A&A, 698, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451869

    Chametla , R., Chrenko , O., Masset , F., D'Angelo , G., & Nesvorn \'y , D. 2025, A&A, 698, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451869

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451869 2025

  15. [15]

    2024, A&A, 690, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450922

    Chrenko , O., Chametla , R., Masset , F., Baruteau , C., & Broz , M. 2024, A&A, 690, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450922

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450922 2024

  16. [16]

    R., Jones, H

    de Val-Borro , M., Edgar , R. G., Artymowicz , P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 529, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10488.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10488.x 2006

  17. [17]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 843, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f2

    Dong , R., Li , S., Chiang , E., & Li , H. 2017, , 843, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f2 2017

  18. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    ---. 2018, , 866, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aadadd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadadd 2018

  19. [19]

    2015, , 809, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/93

    Dong , R., Zhu , Z., & Whitney , B. 2015, , 809, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/93

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/93 2015

  20. [20]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Drazkowska , J., Bitsch , B., Lambrechts , M., et al. 2023, Protostars and Planets VII, ASP Conference Series, 534, 717, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09759 2023

  21. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Dullemond , C., Birnstiel , T., Huang , J., et al. 2018, , 869, L46, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 2018

  22. [22]

    C., Lissauer, J

    Fabrycky , D., Lissauer , J., Ragozzine , D., et al. 2014, , 790, 146, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/146

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146 2014

  23. [23]

    The full census of planet-forming disks with GTO and DESTINYS programs

    Garufi , A., Ginski , C., van Holstein , R., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347586

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347586 2024

  24. [24]

    2025, A&A, 694, A290, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

    Garufi , A., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Mac \'i as , E., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A290, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452496 2025

  25. [25]

    Goldreich , P., & Schlichting , H. E. 2014, , 147, 32, 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/32

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/32 2014

  26. [26]

    Goldreich , P., & Ward , W. R. 1973, , 183, 1051, 10.1086/152291

    work page doi:10.1086/152291 1973

  27. [27]

    2023, , 953, 97, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd2cb

    Guilera , O., Benitez-Llambay , P., Miller Bertolami , M., & Pessah , M. 2023, , 953, 97, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd2cb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd2cb 2023

  28. [28]

    2025, , 986, 199, 10.3847/1538-4357/add92a

    ---. 2025, , 986, 199, 10.3847/1538-4357/add92a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add92a 2025

  29. [29]

    2012, , 758, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/L19

    Hashimoto , J., Dong , R., Kudo , T., et al. 2012, , 758, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/L19

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/l19 2012

  30. [30]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , year = 1981, month = jan, volume =

    Hayashi , C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 35, 10.1143/PTPS.70.35

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.70.35 1981

  31. [31]

    2009, A&A, 502, 385, 110.1051/0004-6361/200911865

    Hersant , F. 2009, A&A, 502, 385, 110.1051/0004-6361/200911865

    2009

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2115 , eprint =

    Hsieh , H. F., & Lin , M. K. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 2425, 10.1093/mnras/staa2115

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2115 2020

  33. [33]

    Kanagawa , K. D. 2019, , 879, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a0f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a0f 2019

  34. [34]

    D., Takayuki , M., Satoshi , O., et al

    Kanagawa , K. D., Takayuki , M., Satoshi , O., et al. 2018, , 868, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae837

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae837 2018

  35. [35]

    D., Ueda , T., Muto , T., & Okuzumi , S

    Kanagawa , K. D., Ueda , T., Muto , T., & Okuzumi , S. 2017, , 844, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ca1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ca1 2017

  36. [36]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243849

    Kuwahara , A., Kurokawa , H., Tanigawa , T., & Ida , S. 2022, A&A, 665, A122, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243849

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243849 2022

  37. [37]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Kuwahara , A., Lambrechts , M., Kurokawa , H., Okuzumi , S., & Tanigawa , T. 2024, A&A, 692, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451159

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451159 2024

  38. [38]

    2024, A&A, 688, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450464

    Lau , T., Birnstiel , T., Drazkowska , J., & Stammler , S. 2024, A&A, 688, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450464

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450464 2024

  39. [39]

    J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D

    Lissauer , J., Ragozzine , D., Fabrycky , D., et al. 2011, , 197, 8, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/8

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/8 2011

  40. [40]

    2013, , 770, 131, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/131

    Lissauer , J., Jontof-Hutter , D., Rowe , J., et al. 2013, , 770, 131, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/131

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/131 2013

  41. [41]

    2026, Nature, 649, 310, 10.1038/s41586-025-09840-z

    Livingston , J., Petigura , E., David , T., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 310, 10.1038/s41586-025-09840-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09840-z 2026

  42. [42]

    2020, A&A, 641, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038297

    Marzari , F., & D'Angelo , G. 2020, A&A, 641, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038297

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038297 2020

  43. [43]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 2913, 10.1093/mnras/stad313

    ---. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2913, 10.1093/mnras/stad313

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad313 2023

  44. [44]

    2012, A&A, 541, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118737

    Muller , T., Kley , W., & Meru , F. 2012, A&A, 541, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118737

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118737 2012

  45. [45]

    2009, MNRAS, 396, 1383, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14843.x

    Paardekooper , S.-J., Baruteau , C., Crida , A., & Kley , W. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1950, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15782.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15782.x 2010

  46. [46]

    and Ogilvie, Gordon and Tanaka, Hidekazu , month = mar, year =

    Paardekooper , S.-J., Dong , R., Duffell , P., et al. 2023, Protostars and Planets VII, ASP Conference Series, 534, 685, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09595

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09595 2023

  47. [47]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Paardekooper , S.-J., & Mellema , G. 2004, A&A, 425, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361:200400053

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400053 2004

  48. [48]

    2006, A&A, 453, 1129, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054449

    ---. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054449

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054449 2006

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Pinilla , P., Pascucci , I., & Marino , S. 2020, A&A, 635, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937003

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937003 2020

  50. [50]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 6538, 10.1093/mnras/stad3163

    Pritchard , M., Meru , F., Rowther , S., Armstrong , D., & Randall , K. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6538, 10.1093/mnras/stad3163

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3163 2024

  51. [51]

    2020, , 497, 5540, 10.1093/mnras/staa2181

    Regaly , Z. 2020, , 497, 5540, 10.1093/mnras/staa2181

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2181 2020

  52. [52]

    2025, A&A, 694, 279, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452806

    Regaly , Z., N \'e meth , A., Krup \'a nszky , G., & S \'a ndor , Z. 2025, A&A, 694, 279, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452806

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452806 2025

  53. [53]

    2022, , 164, 109, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7be4

    Rich , E., Monnier , J., Aarnio , A., et al. 2022, , 164, 109, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7be4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7be4 2022

  54. [54]

    2025, A&A, 703, 270, 10.1051/0004-6361/202556463

    Roatti , V., Picogna , G., & Marzari , F. 2025, A&A, 703, 270, 10.1051/0004-6361/202556463

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556463 2025

  55. [55]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Shakura , N. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  56. [56]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Sierra , A., Lizano , S., Mac \'i as , E., et al. 2019, , 876, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1265 2019

  57. [57]

    H., & Hwang, J

    Steffen , J., & Hwang , J. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1956, 10.1093/mnras/stv104

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv104 2015

  58. [58]

    Takeuchi , T., & Lin , D. N. C. 2005, , 623, 482, 10.1086/428378

    work page doi:10.1086/428378 2005

  59. [59]

    2016, A&A, 591, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527732

    Taki , T., Fujimoto , M., & Ida , S. 2016, A&A, 591, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527732

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527732 2016

  60. [60]

    Tanaka , H., Takeuchi , T., & Ward , W. R. 2002, , 565, 1257, 10.1086/324713

    work page doi:10.1086/324713 2002

  61. [61]

    2018, , 854, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab63

    Weber , P., Ben \'i tez-Llambay , P., Gressel , O., Krapp , L., & Pessah , M. 2018, , 854, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab63

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaab63 2018

  62. [62]

    2019, , 884, 178, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab412f

    Weber , P., P \'e rez , S., Ben \'i tez-Llambay , P., et al. 2019, , 884, 178, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab412f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab412f 2019

  63. [63]

    N., & Goodman, J

    Youdin , A., & Goodman , J. 2005, , 620, 459, 10.1086/426895

    work page doi:10.1086/426895 2005

  64. [64]

    2002, , 580, 494, 10.1086/343109

    Youdin , A., & Shu , F. 2002, , 580, 494, 10.1086/343109

    work page doi:10.1086/343109 2002