pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02382 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: unknown

State-Specific Kinetic Modeling of Atomic H for H₂/ He Entry Flows

Alex T. Carroll , Guillaume Blanquart , Aaron M. Brandis , Brett A. Cruden
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.plasm-ph
keywords state-specific kineticsatomic hydrogenthermochemical modelshock tuberadiance profilesionizationH2-He mixturesplanetary entry
0
0 comments X

The pith

An 11-species thermochemical model with state-specific kinetics for atomic hydrogen reproduces experimental radiance profiles in H2-He shock flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops and tests a kinetic model for hydrogen-helium mixtures that tracks individual excited states of atomic hydrogen to simulate chemistry, ionization, and radiation during high-speed atmospheric entry. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate non-equilibrium predictions matter for designing thermal protection systems on probes entering ice giant or gas giant atmospheres. The authors compile literature rate constants, implement the model in a one-dimensional space-marching shock code that includes boundary-layer effects, and compare results directly to radiance measurements from the EAST shock tube. The simulations match observed radiance levels and the distinct induction-zone delay seen in experiments while outperforming earlier models on ionization and radiation profiles. A sensitivity study of the rates and boundary-layer treatment points to specific paths for refinement.

Core claim

The central claim is that an 11-species thermochemical model incorporating state-specific excitation and ionization kinetics for atomic hydrogen produces radiance profiles that match EAST experimental data reasonably well at conditions relevant to ice and gas giant entry, while correctly reproducing the observed induction zone behavior and yielding more accurate ionization and radiation predictions than alternate literature models.

What carries the argument

The 11-species thermochemical model with state-specific kinetics for atomic H, implemented in a space-marching code that accounts for shock-tube boundary layer effects.

If this is right

  • The model captures the distinct induction zone behavior observed in the experiments.
  • Ionization and radiation profiles are predicted with improved accuracy relative to alternate models from the literature.
  • A sensitivity analysis identifies specific kinetic rates and boundary-layer treatments that most affect the results and can guide refinements.
  • The approach enables more reliable simulation of entry flows for ice and gas giant atmospheres.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same state-specific treatment could be tested on shock data from other gas mixtures to check whether the induction-zone capture generalizes.
  • Obtaining new heavy-particle rate constant measurements would directly reduce the largest uncertainty identified in the model.
  • If the improved radiation predictions hold, the model could be coupled to multi-dimensional flow solvers to assess heat-shield performance under realistic entry trajectories.

Load-bearing premise

Heavy-particle-impact rate constants drawn from the limited and discrepant literature values are assumed to be accurate enough for reliable predictions.

What would settle it

A new set of EAST-style radiance measurements at comparable H2-He conditions in which the model either misses the induction-zone delay or deviates substantially from measured peak radiance values would falsify the accuracy claim.

read the original abstract

An 11-species thermochemical model for H$_2$/ He mixtures with state-specific kinetics for atomic H is developed and used to simulate 1-D shocks at conditions relevant for ice and gas giant entry flows. To implement this kinetic model, a literature review of the state-specific excitation and ionization rate constants of atomic H is first performed. While electron-impact rate constants from various sources are found to be in good agreement, large discrepancies are found in the limited data available on heavy-particle-impact rate constants. To validate the kinetic model, 1-D steady shocks are simulated using a space-marching code that explicitly accounts for shock tube boundary layer effects. The resulting radiance profiles are compared to experimental data from the NASA Ames Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) facility, and are found to reproduce the measured values reasonably accurately while capturing the distinct induction zone behavior observed in the experiments. A sensitivity analysis of the kinetic rates and boundary layer treatment reveals avenues for further improvement of the model. Finally, a comparison to alternate models from the literature underscores the improved accuracy of the present model in predicting ionization and radiation profiles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops an 11-species thermochemical model for H2/He mixtures incorporating state-specific kinetics for atomic H. It reviews literature excitation and ionization rate constants (noting agreement for electron-impact rates but large discrepancies for heavy-particle rates), performs 1-D steady shock simulations with a space-marching code that accounts for boundary-layer effects, validates the resulting radiance profiles against EAST experimental data (reproducing measured values reasonably well and capturing the induction zone), conducts a sensitivity analysis on rates and boundary-layer treatment, and shows improved accuracy over alternate literature models for ionization and radiation predictions.

Significance. If the central validation holds, the work supplies a state-specific kinetic model with direct experimental grounding that can improve predictions of radiative heating and ionization in gas-giant entry flows; the explicit comparison to EAST data and to alternate models is a strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Literature review of rate constants and validation results] The validation success and claim of improved accuracy over alternate models rest on the selected heavy-particle-impact rate constants. Although the abstract and results section note large discrepancies in the limited literature data for these rates and mention a sensitivity analysis, the manuscript reports the match to EAST radiance profiles and the induction-zone behavior only for the chosen rate set; no explicit test is shown that the agreement persists (or that superiority over alternate models is retained) when other plausible literature rate sets are substituted. This leaves open whether the reported improvements arise primarily from the state-specific treatment or from the particular rate selection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential value of the state-specific model. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the validation results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The validation success and claim of improved accuracy over alternate models rest on the selected heavy-particle-impact rate constants. Although the abstract and results section note large discrepancies in the limited literature data for these rates and mention a sensitivity analysis, the manuscript reports the match to EAST radiance profiles and the induction-zone behavior only for the chosen rate set; no explicit test is shown that the agreement persists (or that superiority over alternate models is retained) when other plausible literature rate sets are substituted. This leaves open whether the reported improvements arise primarily from the state-specific treatment or from the particular rate selection.

    Authors: We agree that the referee has identified a gap in the current validation. Our sensitivity analysis varied selected rates within the ranges reported in the literature, but we did not substitute complete alternative heavy-particle rate sets and re-validate the full radiance and induction-zone predictions against EAST data. In the revised manuscript we will add these explicit comparisons using other plausible literature rate sets. This will demonstrate that the agreement with experiment and the improved ionization/radiation predictions relative to alternate models are retained, thereby clarifying that the state-specific treatment is the primary source of the improvement rather than the particular rate choice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper selects heavy-particle and electron-impact rate constants from external literature sources (noting discrepancies but choosing specific values), implements an 11-species state-specific kinetic model, runs forward 1-D space-marching shock simulations that include boundary-layer effects, and validates the output radiance profiles against independent experimental data from the NASA Ames EAST facility. A sensitivity analysis and comparison to alternate literature models are also performed. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claims rest on external benchmarks and forward computation rather than renaming or re-predicting the same quantities used to build the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model depends on literature-derived rate constants with acknowledged uncertainties in heavy-particle impacts and assumptions about the simulation code's boundary layer treatment.

free parameters (1)
  • selected heavy-particle impact rate constants
    Chosen from limited literature data despite large discrepancies noted in the review
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The space-marching code accurately accounts for shock tube boundary layer effects
    Used in the 1-D steady shock simulations to match experimental conditions
  • domain assumption The 11-species thermochemical model sufficiently captures the relevant chemistry for the entry flow conditions
    Basis for the kinetic model development and validation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1425 out tokens · 83143 ms · 2026-05-08T02:46:31.223991+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Approximations for Collisional and Rad iative Transition Rates in Atomic Hydrogen,

    Johnson, L. C., “Approximations for Collisional and Rad iative Transition Rates in Atomic Hydrogen,” The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 174, 1972, p. 227. https://doi.org/10.1086/151486

    work page doi:10.1086/151486 1972

  2. [2]

    Test Time in Low-Pressure Shock Tubes,

    Mirels, H., “Test Time in Low-Pressure Shock Tubes,” The Physics of Fluids , Vol. 6, No. 9, 1963, p. 1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1706887

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1706887 1963

  3. [3]

    https://doi.org/10.17226/1 3117

    National Research Council, Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013- 2022, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/1 3117

    work page doi:10.17226/1 2013

  4. [4]

    https://doi.org/10.17226/26522, URL https://doi.org/10.17226/26522

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medic ine, Origins, Worlds, and Life: A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology 2023-2032, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17226/26522. 39

    work page doi:10.17226/26522 2023

  5. [5]

    Aeroheating U ncertainties in Uranus and Saturn Entries by the Monte Carlo Method,

    Palmer, G., Prabhu, D., and Cruden, B. A., “Aeroheating U ncertainties in Uranus and Saturn Entries by the Monte Carlo Method,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets , Vol. 51, No. 3, 2014, pp. 801–814. https://doi.org/10.251 4/1.a32768

    2014

  6. [6]

    Shock Radiation Test s for Saturn and Uranus Entry Probes,

    Cruden, B. A., and Bogdanoff, D. W., “Shock Radiation Test s for Saturn and Uranus Entry Probes,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2017, pp. 1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.2 514/1.a33891

    2017

  7. [7]

    Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Shock Simulation of Saturn Entry Probe Conditions,

    Higdon, K. J., Cruden, B. A., Brandis, A. M., Liechty, D. S ., Goldstein, D. B., and Varghese, P. L., “Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Shock Simulation of Saturn Entry Probe Conditions,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer , Vol. 32, No. 3, 2018, pp. 680–690. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t5275

    work page doi:10.2514/1.t5275 2018

  8. [8]

    Ioni zation kinetic model for Hydrogen-Helium atmospheres in hypersonic shock tubes,

    Colonna, G., Pietanza, L. D., and Laricchiuta, A., “Ioni zation kinetic model for Hydrogen-Helium atmospheres in hypersonic shock tubes,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer , Vol. 156, 2020, p. 119916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119916

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119916 2020

  9. [9]

    Using Aerothermodynamic Similarity to Experimentally Study Nonequilibrium Giant Planet Entry,

    Liu, Y ., James, C. M., Morgan, R. G., and McIntyre, T. J., “ Using Aerothermodynamic Similarity to Experimentally Study Nonequilibrium Giant Planet Entry,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets , Vol. 57, No. 5, 2020, p. 1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a34713

    work page doi:10.2514/1.a34713 2020

  10. [10]

    Electron Number Density Measure ments in a Saturn Entry Condition,

    Liu, Y ., James, C. M., Morgan, R. G., Jacobs, P. A., Gollan, R., and McIntyre, T. J., “Electron Number Density Measure ments in a Saturn Entry Condition,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2022, p. 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.25 14/1.j060560

    2022

  11. [11]

    Analysis of Chemical Kinetic Parameters for Hydrogen Atmospheres,

    Hansson, K., Carroll, A. T., Poovathingal, S. J., and Bo yd, I. D., “Analysis of Chemical Kinetic Parameters for Hydrogen Atmospheres,” AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum , American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021 . https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0706

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2021-0706 2021

  12. [12]

    Stagnation Point Co nvective Heating Correlations for Entry into H 2/He Atmospheres,

    Carroll, A. T., and Brandis, A. M., “Stagnation Point Co nvective Heating Correlations for Entry into H 2/He Atmospheres,” AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum , American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023 . https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0208

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2023-0208 2023

  13. [13]

    Aerothermodynamic ana lysis of Neptune ballistic entry and aerocapture flows,

    Coelho, J., and da Silva, M. L., “Aerothermodynamic ana lysis of Neptune ballistic entry and aerocapture flows,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 71, No. 8, 2023, pp. 3408–3432. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.asr.2022.12.024

    2023

  14. [14]

    A eroheating Environment of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters,

    Scoggins, J. B., Hinkle, A. D., and Shellabarger, E., “A eroheating Environment of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters,” AIAA Scitech 2024 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024 . https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-0951

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2024-0951 2024

  15. [15]

    Commissioning of Upgrades to T6 to Study Giant Planet Entry ,

    Steer, J., Collen, P., Glenn, A., Hambidge, C., Doherty , L. J., McGilvray, M., Sopek, T., Loehle, S., and Walpot, L., “Commissioning of Upgrades to T6 to Study Giant Planet Entry ,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets , 2024, p. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a35893

    work page doi:10.2514/1.a35893 2024

  16. [16]

    Investigation on the Usab ility of Arc-Jet Generators for the Experimental Simulation of Gian t Planet Entry,

    Steuer, D. C., Donaldson, N., Dürnhofer, C. A., Leiser, D., Fasoulas, S., and Loehle, S., “Investigation on the Usab ility of Arc-Jet Generators for the Experimental Simulation of Gian t Planet Entry,” AIAA Aviation FORUM AND ASCEND 2024 , American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-3552. 40

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2024-3552 2024

  17. [17]

    Uncert ainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Ice Giant A erocap- ture Aerothermodynamics,

    Rataczak, J. A., Boyd, I. D., and McMahon, J. W., “Uncert ainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Ice Giant A erocap- ture Aerothermodynamics,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer , 2025, p. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t7134

    work page doi:10.2514/1.t7134 2025

  18. [18]

    Hypersonic Blunt-B ody Flows in Hydrogen-Neon Mixtures,

    Stalker, R. J., and Edwards, B. P., “Hypersonic Blunt-B ody Flows in Hydrogen-Neon Mixtures,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1998, p. 729–735. https://doi.org/10.2514 /2.3399

    1998

  19. [19]

    Measurements of the structure of an i onizing shock wave in a hydrogen-helium mixture,

    Leibowitz, L. P., “Measurements of the structure of an i onizing shock wave in a hydrogen-helium mixture,” The Physics of Fluids, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1973, pp. 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1694174

    1973

  20. [20]

    Ionizational Nonequ ilibrium Heating During Outer Planetary Entries,

    Leibowitz, L. P., and Kuo, T.-J., “Ionizational Nonequ ilibrium Heating During Outer Planetary Entries,” AIAA Journal , Vol. 14, No. 9, 1976, pp. 1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.25 14/3.61465

    1976

  21. [21]

    Chemical-Kin etic Parameters of Hyperbolic Earth Entry,

    Park, C., Jaffe, R. L., and Partridge, H., “Chemical-Kin etic Parameters of Hyperbolic Earth Entry,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2001, pp. 76–90. https://doi.org/10.2514/ 2.6582

    2001

  22. [22]

    Monte Carlo simulation of nonequilibrium flow in a low-power hydrogen arcjet,

    Boyd, I. D., “Monte Carlo simulation of nonequilibrium flow in a low-power hydrogen arcjet,” Physics of Fluids , Vol. 9, No. 10, 1997, pp. 3086–3095. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.8 69474

    work page doi:10.1063/1.8 1997

  23. [23]

    K., Langer, W

    Janev, R. K., Langer, W. D., Post, D. E., and Evans, K., Elementary Processes in Hydrogen-Helium Plasmas, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-7 1935-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-7 1987

  24. [24]

    K., and Smith, J

    Janev, R. K., and Smith, J. J., Cross sections for collision processes of hydrogen atoms wi th electrons, protons and multiply charged ions, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 1993

    1993

  25. [25]

    Collision proce sses in low-temperature hydrogen plasmas,

    Janev, R. K., Reiter, D., and Samm, U., “Collision proce sses in low-temperature hydrogen plasmas,” Tech. rep., Ins titut für Plasmaphysik EURATOM Association, Trilateral Euregio Clu ster, 2003

    2003

  26. [26]

    Treatment of Thermal Nonequilibrium Dissociatio n: Theory and Application to H 2,

    Carroll, A. T., Blanquart, G., Brandis, A. M., and Crude n, B. A., “Treatment of Thermal Nonequilibrium Dissociatio n: Theory and Application to H 2,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2026, p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t7242

    work page doi:10.2514/1.t7242 2026

  27. [27]

    Treatment of Thermal Nonequilibrium Dissociation: Rate Constant Review for H 2,

    Carroll, A. T., Wolmer, J., Blanquart, G., Brandis, A. M ., and Cruden, B. A., “Treatment of Thermal Nonequilibrium Dissociation: Rate Constant Review for H 2,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer , 2026 (in press)

    2026

  28. [28]

    Monte Carlo Trajectory Cal culations of Atomic Excitation and Ionization by Thermal Electrons,

    Mansbach, P., and Keck, J., “Monte Carlo Trajectory Cal culations of Atomic Excitation and Ionization by Thermal Electrons,” Physical Review, Vol. 181, No. 1, 1969, pp. 275–289. https://doi.org/10.11 03/physrev.181.275

    1969

  29. [29]

    Electron impact excitation rate coefficients for hydrogen, helium and alkali atoms,

    Park, C., “Electron impact excitation rate coefficients for hydrogen, helium and alkali atoms,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1971, pp. 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0 022-4073(71)90158-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0 1971

  30. [30]

    Cross-section and rat e formulas for electron-impact ionization, excitation, de - excitation, and total depopulation of excited atoms,

    Vriens, L., and Smeets, A. H. M., “Cross-section and rat e formulas for electron-impact ionization, excitation, de - excitation, and total depopulation of excited atoms,” Physical Review A , Vol. 22, No. 3, 1980, pp. 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.22.940. 41

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.22.940 1980

  31. [31]

    T., Calculation of Electron Scattering on Hydrogenic Targets , Elsevier, 1995, p

    Bray, I., and Stelbovics, A. T., Calculation of Electron Scattering on Hydrogenic Targets , Elsevier, 1995, p. 209–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-250x(08)60164-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s1049-250x(08)60164-0 1995

  32. [32]

    Computational methods for electron–a tom collisions in plasma applications,

    Bartschat, K., “Computational methods for electron–a tom collisions in plasma applications,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 46, No. 33, 2013, p. 334004. https://doi.org/10.1088 /0022-3727/46/33/334004

    2013

  33. [33]

    Effective collision strengths for 1s–2s and 1s–2p ele c- tron–hydrogen atom scattering,

    Scholz, T. T., Walters, H. R. J., Burke, P. G., and Scott, M. P., “Effective collision strengths for 1s–2s and 1s–2p ele c- tron–hydrogen atom scattering,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , Vol. 242, No. 4, 1990, pp. 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/242.4.692

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/242.4.692 1990

  34. [34]

    Electron collision cross section s at low energies for all transitions between the n=1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 levels of atomic hydrogen,

    Aggarwal, K. M., Berrington, K. A., Burke, P. G., Kingst on, A. E., and Pathak, A., “Electron collision cross section s at low energies for all transitions between the n=1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 levels of atomic hydrogen,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1991, pp. 1385–1410. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/24/6/024

    1991

  35. [35]

    Effective Collision Strengths for Hydro gen and Hydrogen-Like Ions,

    Callaway, J., “Effective Collision Strengths for Hydro gen and Hydrogen-Like Ions,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , Vol. 57, No. 1-2, 1994, pp. 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1006/ adnd.1994.1009

    work page arXiv 1994

  36. [36]

    An R-matrix with pseudo-states approach to the el ectron- impact excitation of H I for diagnostic applications in fusi on plasmas,

    Anderson, H., Ballance, C. P., Badnell, N. R., and Summe rs, H. P., “An R-matrix with pseudo-states approach to the el ectron- impact excitation of H I for diagnostic applications in fusi on plasmas,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/33/6/311

    2000

  37. [37]

    An R-matrix with pseudo-states approach to the el ectron- impact excitation of H I for diagnostic applications in fusi on plasmas,

    Anderson, H., Ballance, C. P., Badnell, N. R., and Summe rs, H. P., “An R-matrix with pseudo-states approach to the el ectron- impact excitation of H I for diagnostic applications in fusi on plasmas,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1613–1615. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/35/6/701

    2002

  38. [38]

    Non-LTE Line Formation for Hydrogen Revisited,

    Przybilla, N., and Butler, K., “Non-LTE Line Formation for Hydrogen Revisited,” The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 609, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1086/421316

    work page doi:10.1086/421316 2004

  39. [39]

    The validity of classical trajectory and perturbative quantal methods for electron- impact ionization from excited states in H-like ions,

    Griffin, D. C., Ballance, C. P., Pindzola, M. S., Robichea ux, F., Loch, S. D., Ludlow, J. A., Witthoeft, M. C., Colgan, J ., Fontes, C. J., and Schultz, D. R., “The validity of classical trajectory and perturbative quantal methods for electron- impact ionization from excited states in H-like ions,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physic...

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/ 2005

  40. [40]

    Total ionization cross section for electron-hydrogen scattering using a tim e-dependent close-coupling method,

    Pindzola, M. S., and Robicheaux, F., “Total ionization cross section for electron-hydrogen scattering using a tim e-dependent close-coupling method,” Physical Review A, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1996, p. 2142–2145. https://doi.org/10.11 03/physreva.54.2142

    1996

  41. [41]

    Electron-impact ionizat ion of atomic hydrogen from the 1S and 2S states,

    Bartschat, K., and Bray, I., “Electron-impact ionizat ion of atomic hydrogen from the 1S and 2S states,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 29, No. 15, 1996, p. L577–L583. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/29/15/005

    1996

  42. [43]

    Pulsed c rossed-beam study of the ionisation of atomic hydrogen by electron impact,

    Shah, M. B., Elliott, D. S., and Gilbody, H. B., “Pulsed c rossed-beam study of the ionisation of atomic hydrogen by electron impact,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics , Vol. 20, No. 14, 1987, p. 3501–3514. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/20/14/022

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/20/14/022 1987

  43. [44]

    Electron impact ionisation of metastable atomic hydrogen ,

    Defrance, P., Claeys, W., Cornet, A., and Poulaert, G., “Electron impact ionisation of metastable atomic hydrogen ,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics , Vol. 14, No. 1, 1981, p. 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1088 /0022-3700/14/1/013

    1981

  44. [45]

    Non-LTE Balmer line formation in late- type spectra: effects of atomic processes involving hydroge n atoms,

    Barklem, P. S., “Non-LTE Balmer line formation in late- type spectra: effects of atomic processes involving hydroge n atoms,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 466, No. 1, 2007, pp. 327–337. https://doi.org/10.10 51/0004-6361:20066686

    2007

  45. [46]

    1s-2s excitat ion of fast hydrogen atoms in collisions with atomic and molecular hydrogen,

    Hill, J., Geddes, J., and Gilbody, H. B., “1s-2s excitat ion of fast hydrogen atoms in collisions with atomic and molecular hydrogen,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics , Vol. 12, No. 17, 1979, p. 2875–2882. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/12/17/016

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/12/17/016 1979

  46. [47]

    Excitation of fast metastable hydrogen atoms to the n=3 state in pas- sage through gases,

    Hill, J., Geddes, J., and Gilbody, H. B., “Excitation of fast metastable hydrogen atoms to the n=3 state in pas- sage through gases,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics , Vol. 13, No. 5, 1980, p. 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/13/5/020

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/13/5/020 1980

  47. [48]

    Atomic data for fus ion,

    Hunter, H. T., Kirkpatrick, M. I., Alvarez, I., Cisnero s, C., Phaneuf, R. A., and Barnett, C. F., “Atomic data for fus ion,” Tech. rep., Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United S tates), 07 1990. https://doi.org/10.2172/6570226

    work page doi:10.2172/6570226 1990

  48. [49]

    Excitation and ioniza tion in H(1s)-H(1s) collisions,

    Riley, M. E., and Ritchie, A. B., “Excitation and ioniza tion in H(1s)-H(1s) collisions,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , Vol. 32, No. 22, 1999, p. 5279–5288. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/32/22/306

    1999

  49. [50]

    Excitation cross sec tions in a collision between two ground-state hydro- gen atoms,

    Al Atawneh, S. J., and Tőkési, K., “Excitation cross sec tions in a collision between two ground-state hydro- gen atoms,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , Vol. 54, No. 6, 2021, p. 065202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/abece3

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/abece3 2021

  50. [51]

    Vibrational kine t- ics of electronically excited states in H 2 discharges,

    Colonna, G., Pietanza, L. D., D’ Ammando, G., Celiberto , R., Capitelli, M., and Laricchiuta, A., “Vibrational kine t- ics of electronically excited states in H 2 discharges,” The European Physical Journal D , Vol. 71, No. 11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2017-80080-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2017-80080-3 2017

  51. [52]

    Mod eling plasma heating by ns laser pulse,

    Colonna, G., Laricchiuta, A., and Pietanza, L. D., “Mod eling plasma heating by ns laser pulse,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, Vol. 141, 2018, pp. 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sa b.2018.01.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sa 2018

  52. [53]

    Influence of atom-atom collisions on the collisional-radiative ionization and recombination coeffi - cients of hydrogen plasmas,

    Drawin, H. W., “Influence of atom-atom collisions on the collisional-radiative ionization and recombination coeffi - cients of hydrogen plasmas,” Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and nuclei , Vol. 225, No. 5, 1969, pp. 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01392775

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01392775 1969

  53. [54]

    Atom-atom excitation and io nization in shock waves of the noble gases,

    Drawin, H., and Emard, F., “Atom-atom excitation and io nization in shock waves of the noble gases,” Physics Letters A , Vol. 43, No. 4, 1973, pp. 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1016 /0375-9601(73)90331-9. 43

    1973

  54. [55]

    Ionization by moving electrified particl es,

    Thomson, J., “Ionization by moving electrified particl es,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine a nd Journal of Science, Vol. 23, No. 136, 1912, pp. 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1 080/14786440408637241

    1912

  55. [56]

    On inelas- tic hydrogen atom collisions in stellar atmospheres,

    Barklem, P. S., Belyaev, A. K., Guitou, M., Feautrier, N ., Gadéa, F. X., and Spielfiedel, A., “On inelas- tic hydrogen atom collisions in stellar atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics , Vol. 530, 2011, p. A94. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116745

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116745 2011

  56. [57]

    On Drawin /quotesingle.ts1 s formula for ionization in atom-atom collisions,

    Fleischmann, H. H., and Dehmel, R. C., “On Drawin /quotesingle.ts1 s formula for ionization in atom-atom collisions,” Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 252, No. 5, 1972, pp. 435–442. https://doi.org/10.100 7/bf01379737

    1972

  57. [58]

    Statistical equilib rium of lithium in cool stars of different metallicity,

    Steenbock, W., and Holweger, H., “Statistical equilib rium of lithium in cool stars of different metallicity,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 130, No. 2, 1984, pp. 319–323

    1984

  58. [59]

    Quantitative stellar spectroscopy wi th large optical telescopes,

    Lambert, D. L., “Quantitative stellar spectroscopy wi th large optical telescopes,” Physica Scripta , Vol. T47, 1993, pp. 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/1993/t47/ 030

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1993/t47/ 1993

  59. [60]

    Cross sections for l ow-energy inelastic H + Li collisions,

    Belyaev, A. K., and Barklem, P. S., “Cross sections for l ow-energy inelastic H + Li collisions,” Physical Review A , Vol. 68, No. 6, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.68.062703

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062703 2003

  60. [61]

    Inelas tic H+Li and H− +Li+ collisions and non-LTE Li I line formation in stel- lar atmospheres,

    Barklem, P. S., Belyaev, A. K., and Asplund, M., “Inelas tic H+Li and H− +Li+ collisions and non-LTE Li I line formation in stel- lar atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 409, No. 2, 2003, p. L1–L4. https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:20031199

    2003

  61. [63]

    Orig- inally published in: doi:10.1051/0004-63 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A

    Barklem, P. S., Belyaev, A. K., Dickinson, A. S., and Gad éa, F. X., “Inelastic Na+H collision data for non-LTE applic ations in stellar atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 519, 2010, p. A20. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-63 61/201015152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-63 2010

  62. [64]

    Inelastic Mg+H collision processes at low energies,

    Guitou, M., Belyaev, A. K., Barklem, P. S., Spielfiedel, A., and Feautrier, N., “Inelastic Mg+H collision processes at low energies,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , Vol. 44, No. 3, 2011, p. 035202. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/3/035202

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/3/035202 2011

  63. [65]

    Inelastic Mg+H collision data for non-LTE applications in stellar atmospheres,

    Barklem, P. S., Belyaev, A. K., Spielfiedel, A., Guitou, M., and Feautrier, N., “Inelastic Mg+H collision data for non-LTE applications in stellar atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics , Vol. 541, 2012, p. A80. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219081

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219081 2012

  64. [66]

    Nonequilibrium Ionization and Radiation in Hydrogen-Helium Mixtures,

    Park, C., “Nonequilibrium Ionization and Radiation in Hydrogen-Helium Mixtures,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2012, pp. 231–243. https://doi.org/10.251 4/1.t3689

    2012

  65. [67]

    Relaxation Dista nce and Equilibrium Electron Density Measurements in Hydro gen- Helium Plasmas,

    Livingston, F. R., and Poon, P. T. Y ., “Relaxation Dista nce and Equilibrium Electron Density Measurements in Hydro gen- Helium Plasmas,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 9, 1976, pp. 1335–1337. https://doi.org/10.2 514/3.61466. 44

    1976

  66. [68]

    The rate coefficients for the processes of (n-n ’)-mixing in collisions of Rydberg atoms H*(n) with H(1s) atoms,

    Mihajlov, A. A., Ignjatović, L. M., Djurić, Z., and Ljep ojević, N. N., “The rate coefficients for the processes of (n-n ’)-mixing in collisions of Rydberg atoms H*(n) with H(1s) atoms,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , Vol. 37, No. 22, 2004, pp. 4493–4506. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0953-4075/37/22/008

    2004

  67. [69]

    The role of some collisional processes in AGNs: Rate coefficients needed for modeling,

    Dimitrijević, M. S., Srećković, V . A., Ignjatović, L. M ., and Marinković, B. P., “The role of some collisional processes in AGNs: Rate coefficients needed for modeling,” New Astronomy , Vol. 84, 2021, p. 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2020.101529

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2020.101529 2021

  68. [70]

    Chemi-Ionization in Solar Photosph ere: Influence on the Hydrogen Atom Excited States Population,

    Mihajlov, A. A., Ignjatović, L. M., Srećković, V . A., an d Dimitrijević, M. S., “Chemi-Ionization in Solar Photosph ere: Influence on the Hydrogen Atom Excited States Population,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , Vol. 193, No. 1, 2011, p. 2. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/2

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/2 2011

  69. [71]

    Atom-Rydberg atom chemi-ionization/recombinatio n processes in the hydrogen clouds in Broad Line Region of AGNs,

    Srećković, V . A., Dimitrijević, M. S., and Ignjatović, L. M., “Atom-Rydberg atom chemi-ionization/recombinatio n processes in the hydrogen clouds in Broad Line Region of AGNs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2256

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2256 2018

  70. [72]

    Excitation and deexc itation processes in slow collisions of Rydberg atoms with ground-state parent atoms,

    Janev, R. K., and Mihajlov, A. A., “Excitation and deexc itation processes in slow collisions of Rydberg atoms with ground-state parent atoms,” Physical Review A, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1979, p. 1890–1904. https://doi.org/10.11 03/physreva.20.1890

    1979

  71. [73]

    Tsupko, G.S

    Birely, J. H., and McNeal, R. J., “Formation of H ( 2/u1D45D) and H ( 2/u1D460) in Collisions of 1-25-keV Hydrogen Atoms with the Rare Gases,” Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 5, 1972, pp. 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys RevA.5.257

    work page doi:10.1103/phys 1972

  72. [74]

    Small-angle scattering of metastable hydrogen formed by collisions of neutral hydr ogen atoms with gas targets,

    Sauers, I., and Thomas, E. W., “Small-angle scattering of metastable hydrogen formed by collisions of neutral hydr ogen atoms with gas targets,” Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 10, 1974, pp. 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1103/Phy sRevA.10.822

    work page doi:10.1103/phy 1974

  73. [75]

    Hydrogen 2s and 2p excitat ion in low energy H, D+, He collisions,

    Grosser, J., and Krüger, W., “Hydrogen 2s and 2p excitat ion in low energy H, D+, He collisions,” Zeitschrift für Physik. A, Atoms and nuclei, Vol. 318, No. 1, 1984, pp. 25–30

    1984

  74. [76]

    Fowler, Matteo Mariantoni, John M

    Van Zyl, B., and Gealy, M. W., “Lyman- /u1D6FCemission from low-energy H impact on rare-gas atoms,” Phys. Rev. A , Vol. 35, 1987, pp. 3741–3748. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 35.3741

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 1987

  75. [77]

    Theoretical investigation of metastable hydrogen de-excitation in collisions with He and Ne,

    Vegiri, A., “Theoretical investigation of metastable hydrogen de-excitation in collisions with He and Ne,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , Vol. 31, No. 3, 1998, p. 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1088 /0953-4075/31/3/015

    1998

  76. [78]

    Inelastic Heavy Particl e Collisions Involving the Crossing of Potential Energy Cur ves III: Charge Transfer from Negative Ions of Atomic Hydrogen to Protons,

    Bates, D. R., and Lewis, J. T., “Inelastic Heavy Particl e Collisions Involving the Crossing of Potential Energy Cur ves III: Charge Transfer from Negative Ions of Atomic Hydrogen to Protons,” Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, Vol. 68, No. 3, 1955, p. 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-12 98/68/3/306

    work page doi:10.1088/0370-12 1955

  77. [79]

    Experimental study of the mutual neutralisation of H+and H - between 5 and 2000 eV ,

    Szucs, S., Karemera, M., Terao, M., and Brouillard, F., “Experimental study of the mutual neutralisation of H+and H - between 5 and 2000 eV ,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics , Vol. 17, No. 8, 1984, p. 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/17/8/021. 45

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/17/8/021 2000

  78. [80]

    Mutual neutr alization in low-energy H + + H− collisions: A quantum ab initio study,

    Stenrup, M., Larson, A., and Elander, N., “Mutual neutr alization in low-energy H + + H− collisions: A quantum ab initio study,” Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 79, 2009, p. 012713. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR evA.79.012713

    work page doi:10.1103/physr 2009

  79. [81]

    Nonequilibrium Calculation of High-Te mperature Radiating H 2-He Flowfield,

    Furudate, M., “Nonequilibrium Calculation of High-Te mperature Radiating H 2-He Flowfield,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2009, p. 651–659. https://doi.org/10.2514 /1.43961

    2009

  80. [82]

    Flow Nonuniformity in Shock Tubes Operati ng at Maximum Test Times,

    Mirels, H., “Flow Nonuniformity in Shock Tubes Operati ng at Maximum Test Times,” The Physics of Fluids , Vol. 9, No. 10, 1966, p. 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1761542

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1761542 1966

Showing first 80 references.