arxiv: 2605.02477 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Singularity softening and avoidance by the action of thermal radiation in a generalized entropic cosmology

E. Elizalde , A.V. Yurov , A.V. Timoshkin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords entropic cosmologyBig Rip singularitythermal radiationHawking radiationviscous dark fluidsingularity avoidanceFriedmann equationsdark matter coupling

0 comments

The pith

Thermal radiation from Hawking effects can soften the Big Rip singularity or make it disappear in generalized entropic cosmology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how thermal radiation from Hawking processes influences singularities in generalized entropic cosmology with a logarithmic viscous equation of state for a dark fluid coupled to dark matter in a flat FLRW universe. It demonstrates that these effects produce either a milder form of the expected Big Rip or its complete avoidance. A sympathetic reader would care because the result offers a way to regulate future singularities using semi-classical radiation back-reaction rather than full quantum gravity. The work focuses on concrete scenarios near the singularity where the radiation term alters the finite-time behavior while staying inside the entropic framework.

Core claim

It is shown that a scenario arises where a qualitative change towards the good direction in the type of the singularity formed does occur, and another scenario is obtained where the singularity vanishes completely.

What carries the argument

The logarithmic viscous equation of state for the dark fluid that incorporates thermal radiation back-reaction from Hawking effects into the Friedmann equations.

If this is right

The finite-time Big Rip changes qualitatively to a less severe singularity type.
In some parameter choices the singularity is avoided entirely.
The dark matter coupling remains consistent under the added radiation effects.
The overall evolution stays within the generalized entropic model while the radiation term acts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same thermal back-reaction mechanism might regulate other cosmological singularities such as the Big Bang.
Semi-classical effects like Hawking radiation could prove important for regulating extreme regimes in late-universe dynamics.
Precise late-time expansion measurements might eventually reveal indirect signatures of such singularity softening.
The approach could be tested by extending the same radiation term to non-flat or more general entropic cosmologies.

Load-bearing premise

The thermal radiation back-reaction can be consistently added to the Friedmann equations via the given logarithmic viscous equation of state without altering the underlying entropic framework or requiring additional quantum-gravity corrections near the singularity.

What would settle it

An exact or numerical solution of the modified Friedmann equations that yields the same Big Rip singularity type with the thermal radiation term as without it would falsify the softening and avoidance claims.

read the original abstract

Some relevant aspects of a new form of generalized entropic cosmology, recently introduced by Nojiri, Odintsov and Faraoni, are considered. The setup is a logarithmic equation of state for a viscous dark fluid coupled with dark matter, in the ordinary Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker flat universe. The influence of thermal effects, caused by Hawking radiation, near the singularity, are carefully investigated. In particular, their role on the formation and specific type of the Big Rip expected to occur within a finite time. It is shown that a scenario arises, where a qualitative change towards the good direction, in the type of the singularity formed, does occur. On top of that, another very interesting scenario is obtained, where the singularity vanishes completely.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Thermal radiation softens or removes the Big Rip in the Nojiri-Odintsov-Faraoni entropic model, but the back-reaction is added phenomenologically without a clear check near the singularity.

read the letter

The paper extends the recent generalized entropic cosmology of Nojiri, Odintsov and Faraoni by including thermal effects from Hawking radiation in a flat FLRW universe with a logarithmic viscous equation of state for the dark fluid. It reports two concrete outcomes: the Big Rip can change to a milder singularity type, or it can be avoided entirely depending on how the thermal term enters the dynamics. This is the main new piece—an explicit demonstration that thermal back-reaction alters the future singularity in this specific setup. The calculations follow from augmenting the Friedmann equations and tracking the scale factor evolution, which gives clear scenarios for the universe's ultimate fate. That part is straightforward and useful for anyone already using viscous entropic models. The modeling choice is the soft spot. The thermal contribution is inserted via the given logarithmic viscous form, but the paper does not derive this from the underlying entropic framework or show that the same form remains valid when the Hubble rate diverges. Standard thermodynamic relations for viscosity can pick up uncontrolled corrections in that regime, and no extra quantum-gravity terms are added or tested. The stress-test concern lands here; the result is presented as following from the assumptions, yet the consistency near the singularity is assumed rather than verified. This is a limitation but not a fatal one for an incremental study. The work is aimed at researchers who already follow entropic or viscous dark-energy cosmologies and want to see how thermal radiation might regulate singularities in those frameworks. A reader in that niche will get value from the explicit cases. It deserves peer review because the claim is specific and falsifiable within the model, even if the back-reaction step needs tightening.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes a generalized entropic cosmology model (building on Nojiri-Odintsov-Faraoni) in a flat FLRW universe, employing a logarithmic viscous equation of state for the dark fluid coupled to dark matter. It examines the back-reaction of thermal radiation (Hawking radiation) near the Big Rip singularity and claims that these thermal effects induce either a qualitative softening of the singularity type or its complete avoidance.

Significance. If the derivation and consistency checks hold, the result would be significant for entropic cosmology: it supplies an explicit mechanism by which thermal effects can alter or eliminate a finite-time singularity within the existing framework, without requiring additional quantum-gravity corrections. This offers concrete, potentially falsifiable scenarios for singularity resolution and strengthens the link between entropic forces and thermodynamic back-reaction in late-universe dynamics.

major comments (1)

[Sections describing the incorporation of thermal effects and the modified Friedmann equations] The central claim—that thermal radiation produces softening or complete avoidance of the Big Rip—rests on augmenting the Friedmann equations with a specific logarithmic viscous equation of state to capture the back-reaction. This form is introduced to model thermal effects but is not derived from the generalized entropic framework; near the singularity the Hubble rate diverges, so the thermodynamic relations underlying the viscous term may receive uncontrolled corrections, yet no explicit verification that the logarithmic EoS survives in that regime is supplied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting an important point regarding the motivation and regime of validity of the logarithmic viscous equation of state. We address the comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our assumptions and consistency checks.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Sections describing the incorporation of thermal effects and the modified Friedmann equations] The central claim—that thermal radiation produces softening or complete avoidance of the Big Rip—rests on augmenting the Friedmann equations with a specific logarithmic viscous equation of state to capture the back-reaction. This form is introduced to model thermal effects but is not derived from the generalized entropic framework; near the singularity the Hubble rate diverges, so the thermodynamic relations underlying the viscous term may receive uncontrolled corrections, yet no explicit verification that the logarithmic EoS survives in that regime is supplied.

Authors: The logarithmic viscous equation of state is adopted as a concrete realization within the generalized entropic cosmology of Nojiri, Odintsov and Faraoni, where entropic forces naturally generate effective viscous contributions to the dark-fluid dynamics. While the precise logarithmic form is phenomenological (chosen to reproduce known thermodynamic limits), it is directly motivated by the entropic framework rather than introduced ad hoc to model thermal radiation. The thermal back-reaction itself is incorporated by augmenting the Friedmann equations with the Hawking-radiation term, independent of the viscous EoS. To address the regime of validity near the Big Rip, we have added an explicit asymptotic analysis (new subsection in Section 3 and Appendix B) demonstrating that the logarithmic form remains consistent within the effective-theory description even as H diverges; the leading corrections to the thermodynamic relations are shown to be sub-dominant under the same assumptions used throughout the paper. We agree that a first-principles derivation from the underlying entropic action would be desirable and note this limitation in the revised discussion. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model assumptions are explicit inputs

full rationale

The paper starts from the generalized entropic cosmology framework of Nojiri-Odintsov-Faraoni (external citation, no author overlap), adopts a logarithmic viscous equation of state as an explicit modeling choice to incorporate thermal radiation back-reaction, and then solves the resulting Friedmann equations to obtain singularity softening or avoidance. No step reduces the output to the input by construction: the EoS form is an ansatz for thermal effects rather than a redefinition of the singularity type, and the qualitative change in singularity behavior emerges from integrating the modified dynamics. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks once the EoS parameters are fixed; no self-citation chain or fitted prediction is load-bearing for the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the model rests on an unspecified logarithmic viscous equation of state and the addition of Hawking radiation back-reaction, but no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1152 out tokens · 43398 ms · 2026-05-08T18:40:19.920397+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Constants (RSUnits, ladder constants c=1, ℏ, G as φ-powers) RealityCertificate (constants forced as φ-powers; no free λ) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ρ_rad = λ H^4 ... 3H²/k² = ρ_eff + ρ_g + λ H^4
IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J(x)=½(x+x⁻¹)−1 is the unique calibrated reciprocal cost) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Generalized entropy S_g with parameters α±, γ, β, reducing to Tsallis/Barrow/Renyi/Kaniadakis/Sharma–Mittal in limits
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.AlphaCoordinateFixation alpha_pin_under_high_calibration (parameter-free pinning of α=1) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Logarithmic EoS p = A(ρ/ρ*)^l ln(ρ/ρ*) and viscous dark fluid analysis with multiple tunable parameters (μ, c, d, τ, ζ₀, λ, β)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

A.G. Riess et al . Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009–1038 (1998) doi:10.1086/300499

work page Pith review doi:10.1086/300499 1998
[2]

Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

S. Perlmutter et al . Measurem ents of omega and lambda from 42- redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565–586 (1999) doi:10.1086/307221

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999
[3]

C. Tsallis. Possible generalization Boltzmann-Gibbs statistic. J. Statist. Phys. 52, 479-487 (1988) doi:10.1007/bf01016429

work page doi:10.1007/bf01016429 1988
[4]

Trivedi, M

O. Trivedi, M. Khlopov a nd A.V. Timoshkin. Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with Power Law Ansatz Approach. Symmetry 16 no.4, 446 (2024) doi:10.3390/sym16040446

work page doi:10.3390/sym16040446 2024
[6]

Barrow, The area of rough black holes

J.D. Barrow, The area of rough black holes. B 808, 135643 (2020) doi:101007 /bf01016429

2020
[7]

Renyi, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, St atistics and Probability, University of California Press

A. Renyi, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, St atistics and Probability, University of California Press. 547 -56 (1960) doi:10.4236/jwarp.2023. 15719

work page doi:10.4236/jwarp.2023 1960
[8]

Kaniadakis, Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity

G. Kaniadakis, Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity. Phys. Rev. E 72, 036108 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036108

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.72.036108 2005
[9]

A., Moradpour, H., Morais Graça, J

Sayahian Jahrom i, S.A. Moosavi, H. Moradpour, J.P. Morais Graca, I.P. Lobo, I.G. Salako and A. Jawad, Generalized entropy formalism and a new holographic dark energy model. Phys. Lett. B 780, 21-24 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.052

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.052 2018
[10]

Majhi, Non -extensive statistical mechanics and black hole entropy from quantum geometry

A. Majhi, Non -extensive statistical mechanics and black hole entropy from quantum geometry. Phys. Lett. B 775, 32-36 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.043

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.043 2017
[11]

Nojiri, S.D

S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and F. Faraoni. From nonextensive statistics and black hole entropy to the holographic dark univers e. Phys. Rev. D 105 , no. 4, 044042 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044042

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.044042 2022
[12]

Odintsov and T

S.D. Odintsov and T. Paul, A non- singular generalized entropy and its implications on bounce cosmology, Phys. Dark Univ. 39, 101159 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101159

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101159 2023
[13]

Nojiri, S.D

S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and S. Tsujikawa. Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe. Phys. Rev. D 72, 023003 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063004

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.063004 2005
[14]

de Haro, S

J. de Haro, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou and S. Pan. Finite -time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe. Phys. Rept. 1034 1-114 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.003 2023
[15]

Brevik, M

I. Brevik, M. Khlopov, S.D. Odintsov, A.V. Timoshkin and O . Trivedi. Rips and regular future scenario with holographic dark energy: a comprehensive look. Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.12, 1269. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13601-z

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13601-z 2024
[16]

Capozziello, M

S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Classifying and avoidi ng singularities in the alternative gravity dark energy models, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124007 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.124007

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.124007 2009
[17]

Bamba, S

K. Bamba, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, The Universe future in modified gravity theories: Approac hing the finite -time future singu larity, JCAP 10, 045 (2008) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/045

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/045 2008
[18]

Odintsov and V.K

S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Dynamical systems perspective of cosmological finite-time singularities in f(R) gravity and interacting multifluid cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 98(2) 024013 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024013

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.024013 2018
[19]

Frampton, K.J

P.H. Frampton, K.J. Ludwick and R.J. Scherrer, The little rip, Phys. Rev. D 84 063003(2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.063003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.063003 2011
[20]

Frampton, K.J

P.H. Frampton, K.J. Ludwick and R.J. Scherrer, Pseudo -rip: Cosmological models intermediate between the cosmological constant and the little rip, Phys. Rev. D 85 083001(2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.083001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.083001 2012
[21]

P. H. Frampton, K.J. Ludwick, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and R.J. Scherrer, Models for little rip dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 708 204-211, (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2012.01.048

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2012
[22]

Trivedi and A.V

O. Trivedi and A.V. Timoshkin. Little rip, pseudo rip and bounce cosmology with generalized equation of state in non -standard backgrounds. Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.3, 277 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12640-w

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12640-w 2024
[23]

S.W. Hawking. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys., 43, 199- 220 (1975) doi:10.1007/BF02345020

work page doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975
[24]

Detecting the gravitational wave background from primordial black hole dark matter.Phys

S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov. The dark universe future and singularities: The account of thermal and quantum effects. Phys. Dark Univ., 30, 100695 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.dark. 2020.100695

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark 2020
[25]

Capozziello, S

S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov. Thermal effects and scalar modes in the cosmological propagation of gravitational waves. Phys. Dark Universe 33, 100867 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100867

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100867 2021
[26]

R.G. Cai, N. Ohta. Horizon thermodynamics and gravitational field equations in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 084061 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084061

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.084061 2010
[27]

Nojiri and S.D

S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Quantum de Sitt er cosmology and phantom matter. Phys. Lett. B 562 147-152 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00594-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00594-x 2003
[28]

Barrow and S

J.D. Barrow and S. Cotsakis, Ge odesics at sudden singularities. Phys. Rev. D 88 067301 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.067301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.067301 2013
[29]

Nojiri and S.D

S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Quantum escape of sudden future singularity, Phys.Lett . B 595, 1-8 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.060

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.060 2004
[30]

Mayer et al

B. Mayer et al. , Ab-initio calculation of the elastic constants and thermal expansion coefficients of laves phases, Intermetallics 11, 23 (2003) doi:10.1016/s0966- 97959(02)00127-09

work page doi:10.1016/s0966- 2003
[31]

Capozziello, R

S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino, R. Giamb and O. Luongo, Effective field description of the Anton -Schmidt cosmic fluid, Phys. Rev. D 99 023532 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023532

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.023532 2019
[32]

Chavanis

P.H. Chavanis. Is the universe logotropic? Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130 130 (2015) doi:101140 /epjp/i2015-15130-5

2015
[33]

Chavanis, The logotropic dark fluid as a unification of dark matter and dark energy, Phys

P.H. Chavanis, The logotropic dark fluid as a unification of dark matter and dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 758 59 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.042

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.042 2016
[34]

Odintsov, V.K

S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, A.V. Timoshkin, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, R. Myrzakulov. Cosmological fluids with logarithmic equation of state . Annals of Physics 398 238-253 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.09.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.09.015 2018
[35]

Brevik, A.V

I. Brevik, A.V. Timoshkin, K. Myrzakulov, A. Zhadyranova. Viscous coupled fluids in terms of a log -corrected equation of state . Int. J. Geom. Meth . Mod. Phys. Vol. 18, No. 12 2150198 (2021) doi:10.1142/S021988782150198X

work page doi:10.1142/s021988782150198x 2021
[36]

Capozziello, R

S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino and O. Luongo, Cosmic acceleration from a single fluid description, preprint (2017), arXiv:1712.04317 [gr-qc] doi:1048550/ arXiv:1712.04317

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Capozziello, V

S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Observational constraints on dark energy with generalized equations of state, Phys. Rev. D 73 043512 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.043512

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.043512 2006
[38]

Brevik, J

I. Brevik, J. de Haro, S.D. Odintsov and E.N. S aridakis. Viscous Cosmology for Early and Late Time Universe. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 no.14, 1730024 (2017) doi:10.1142/S0218271817300245

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271817300245 2017
[39]

, title =

D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 2333-2346 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973
[40]

Nojiri, Serg ei D

S. Nojiri, Serg ei D. Odintsov, T. Paul . Phys. Lett. Early and late universe holographic cosmology from new generalized entropy. B 831(6): 137189 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137189

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137189 2022
[41]

Brevik, A

I. Brevik, A. V. Timoshkin and Tanmoy Paul. The effect of thermal radiation on singularities in the dark universe. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.Vol. 18, No. 7 2150113 (2021) doi:10.1142/S0219887821501139

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887821501139 2021
[42]

Brevik and A.V

I. Brevik and A.V. Timoshkin. Singular Behavior of the Dark Universe under the Effect of Thermal Radiation in Curved Spacetime. Sym metry 15 no.2, 257 (2023) doi:10.3390/sym15020257

work page doi:10.3390/sym15020257 2023
[43]

Brevik, E

I. Brevik, E. Eliz alde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov. Viscous little rip cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 84, 103508 (2011) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.103508

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.103508 2011
[44]

Brevik, R

I. Brevik, R. Murzakulov, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov. Turbulence and little rip cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 86, 063007 (2012) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86. 063007

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86 2012
[45]

Elizalde, M

E. Elizalde, M. Khurshudyan and S. Nojiri, Cosmological singularities in interacting dark energy models with an ω(q) parametrization, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2018) doi:10.1142/S0218271819500196

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271819500196 2018
[46]

Brevik, A.N

I. Brevik, A.N. Makarenko, A.V. Timoshkin. Viscous Accelerating Universe with non- linear and Logarithmic equation of state fluid. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. Vol. 16, No. 10 1950150 (2019) doi:10.1142/S0219887819501500

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887819501500 2019
[47]

Khursudyan, M

M. Khursudyan, M. Hakobyan and A. Khursudyan, Nonlinear logarithmic interactions and a varying plytropic gas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 1850189 (2018) doi:10.1142/S0217732318501894

work page doi:10.1142/s0217732318501894 2018
[48]

Brevik, A.V

I. Brevik, A.V. Timoshkin. Holographic cosmology with logarithmic equation of state based on new generalized entropy. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2550214 (2025) doi:10.1142/S021988782550214

work page doi:10.1142/s021988782550214 2025
[49]

T. Paul. Origin of bulk viscosity in cosmology and its thermodynamic implications. Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 8, 083540 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083540

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083540 2025
[50]

Astashenok, S.D

A.V. Astashenok, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Dark energy and cosmological horizon thermal effects. Phys. Rev. D 103 043514 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043514

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043514 2021
[51]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou. Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late -time Evolution. Phys. Rept. 692, 1-104 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 2017
[52]

Odintsov

S.D. Odintsov. Modified gravity: the game of theories? Russ. Phys. J 68, 108- 112 (2025) doi.org/10.1007/s11182-025-03408-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11182-025-03408-0 2025