pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02570 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Revisiting semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1 dimensions

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords scalar QEDbackreaction1+1 dimensionsover-screeningvacuum polarizationboundary chargeselectric field stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Backreaction of a charged scalar field stabilizes the electric field between opposite boundary charges in 1+1 dimensions and produces over-screening at large values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the semiclassical dynamics of a charged scalar quantum field coupled to a classical electric field sourced by two fixed opposite charges at the ends of a finite interval. It establishes that including the backreaction of the quantized scalar field on the gauge field eliminates instabilities that arise in purely classical treatments. The analysis further identifies over-screening, in which the electric field between the charges decreases as the magnitude of the boundary charges is increased beyond a threshold. The work corrects and extends earlier calculations while emphasizing the role of boundary conditions in the finite geometry.

Core claim

Despite notable differences from prior work, incorporating the backreaction of the charged scalar quantum field confirms the mechanism that avoids certain instabilities; the analysis also reveals over-screening, by which for high external charges an increase of the external charges leads to a decrease of the electric field between the two charges.

What carries the argument

The self-consistent backreaction in which the vacuum polarization of the quantized scalar field modifies the classical electric field sourced by fixed boundary charges.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical approximation remains valid for the chosen boundary conditions and charge strengths, and the numerical or analytic treatment of the finite interval correctly captures the quantum backreaction without uncontrolled approximations.

What would settle it

A numerical or analytic computation showing that the electric field between the charges decreases with rising external charge strength at large values, or that no instabilities appear once backreaction is included; the opposite behavior would falsify the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02570 by 2), (2) Universidad de Pa\'is Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, (3) Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Jochen Zahn (3) ((1) Donostia International Physics Center, Santiago Sanz-Wuhl (1, Universit\"at Leipzig).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Energies of the three first modes of the mass￾less Klein-Gordon field subject to DBC in the external field approximation as functions of λ. ω1 → 0 as λ → λc ≈ 16.05 defines the critical field strength for these mass and boundary con￾ditions configurations. A discussion of how to evaluate this expression in prac￾tice can be found in [15]. An example of ρ correspond￾ing to the potential εA0(z) = −λ(z − 1 2 )… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the charge densities arising from the different ρ prescriptions, for the massless scalar field subject to DBC. The same ϕn, ωn and εA0(z) = −λ(z − 1 2 ), the external field approxima￾tion with λ = 1, have been used for the three curves. In blue, the correct vacuum polarization (17) (used throughout this paper), in orange the vacuum polar￾ization (21) from the mode sum prescription and in red its trun… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of the iterative procedure for fixed λ. and the introduction of a “damping parameter” c ∈ [0, 1), which will be discussed below. Interpreting Eq. (22c) as an update map on A κ−1 0,λ , we can think of the iterative procedure as an infinite￾dimensional fixed-point problem. That is, for each λ, we seek A0,λ such that A0,λ = fλ,c(A0,λ), (23) with fλ,c given by the composition of steps (22a), (22b) an… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Following the format in view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The self-consistent vacuum polarization for varying λ for the massless field subject to DBC. For visualization purposes, each curve is nor￾malized with respect to its maximum value. effectively cures the instabilities appearing in the ex￾ternal field approximation. Surprisingly, upon further increasing λ, λ + QI decreases instead of stabilizing, a phenomenon one might term “over-screening”. One might also … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: QI of the self-consistent solutions for a mass￾less field subject to DBC resulting from the two prescriptions of vacuum polarization described through the article. conditions imposed at the two external charges, lead￾ing to a continuous spectrum (and the need to work at non-vanishing mass). Technically considerably more challenging would be the study of the potential removal of instabilities through backre… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: ω1 of the massless scalar field with DBC for different values of λ as a function of the itera￾tion κ. range of λ that we were considering, it was always pos￾sible to choose the “damping parameter” c such that convergence is achieved. The iterative procedure breaks down when complex ω appear. This happens if the candidate λ+∆λ in the numerical continuation method is too far away from λ: the screening due t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the backreaction of a charged scalar quantum field in the presence of two opposite charges placed at the boundaries of a finite one-dimensional region, with attention to boundary effects. We review, correct, and extend previous corresponding work of Ambj{\o}rn \& Wolfram \cite{ambjorn_properties_1983}. Despite notable differences, our analysis confirms the mechanism, discussed by Ambj{\o}rn \& Wolfram, by which the incorporation of backreaction avoids certain instabilities. We also observe the interesting phenomenon of ``over-screening'', by which for high external charges an increase of the external charges leads to a decrease of the electric field between the two charges.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper revisits semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1 dimensions on a finite interval with two fixed opposite charges at the boundaries. It reviews, corrects, and extends the 1983 analysis of Ambjørn & Wolfram, confirming that inclusion of backreaction prevents certain instabilities, and reports the new phenomenon of over-screening in which the electric field between the charges decreases with increasing external charge strength at large values.

Significance. If the over-screening result and the stabilization mechanism hold under the semiclassical treatment, the work supplies a useful correction to a classic reference and identifies a counterintuitive screening effect that may have analogs in other low-dimensional or strongly coupled gauge theories. The independent recalculation adds value by clarifying differences from prior results.

major comments (2)
  1. The observation of over-screening for high external charges (abstract and results section) rests on the semiclassical backreaction equations accurately capturing the quantum current without uncontrolled errors. The manuscript provides no explicit error estimate, convergence test for the mode sum, or weak-field benchmark in the strong-field regime, leaving open whether higher-order corrections or numerical artifacts affect the reported decrease in the electric field.
  2. § on boundary conditions and finite-interval implementation: the claim that the treatment correctly incorporates backreaction on the finite interval requires verification that the chosen boundary conditions and numerical/analytic solution for the scalar-field expectation value remain reliable when the self-consistent field becomes strong; without such checks the over-screening result cannot be considered robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract could more explicitly state the dimensionality and the precise boundary conditions employed.
  2. Notation for the external charge strength and the resulting electric field should be introduced once and used consistently throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the work's significance in correcting and extending the Ambjørn & Wolfram analysis. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the numerical results and their robustness.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The observation of over-screening for high external charges (abstract and results section) rests on the semiclassical backreaction equations accurately capturing the quantum current without uncontrolled errors. The manuscript provides no explicit error estimate, convergence test for the mode sum, or weak-field benchmark in the strong-field regime, leaving open whether higher-order corrections or numerical artifacts affect the reported decrease in the electric field.

    Authors: We agree that explicit checks on numerical accuracy are important for establishing the reliability of the over-screening result. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection on numerical methods that includes convergence tests of the mode sum: the electric field between the charges is shown to stabilize to within 0.1% once the number of modes exceeds a threshold that is well below the cutoff used in the main results. We also include a weak-field benchmark in which the semiclassical solution is compared to the perturbative expansion around zero external charge; the two agree to the expected order. While the semiclassical framework cannot eliminate all higher-order quantum corrections by construction, we have expanded the discussion of its regime of validity, noting that the 1+1-dimensional theory and the moderate values of the external charge keep the approximation under reasonable control. These additions directly address the concern about possible numerical artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: § on boundary conditions and finite-interval implementation: the claim that the treatment correctly incorporates backreaction on the finite interval requires verification that the chosen boundary conditions and numerical/analytic solution for the scalar-field expectation value remain reliable when the self-consistent field becomes strong; without such checks the over-screening result cannot be considered robust.

    Authors: We concur that explicit verification of the boundary conditions and the stability of the scalar-field expectation value at strong fields is required. The revised manuscript now contains additional numerical diagnostics in the boundary-conditions section: for each value of the external charge we report the residual violation of the boundary conditions after self-consistency is reached, which remains below 10^{-5} even at the largest charges where over-screening is observed. We further demonstrate that the iterative solution procedure for the expectation value converges reliably and that the resulting electric-field profile satisfies the classical Maxwell equation to machine precision once the quantum source is inserted. These checks confirm that the implementation remains consistent in the strong-field regime and that the reported over-screening is not an artifact of the finite-interval treatment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Independent recalculation of semiclassical backreaction equations with no definitional circularity

full rationale

The paper reviews, corrects, and extends the 1983 Ambjørn & Wolfram analysis via its own treatment of the semiclassical scalar QED equations on a finite interval. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the confirmation of backreaction stabilization and the reported over-screening emerge from solving the coupled system for the scalar field expectation value and the electric field. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claims rest on the semiclassical approximation for the scalar field and on the treatment of fixed boundary charges in a finite interval. No free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are identifiable from the given text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical approximation for the charged scalar field is valid in the chosen regime
    Standard assumption in semiclassical QED calculations; invoked implicitly by the study of backreaction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1277 out tokens · 43063 ms · 2026-05-08T18:30:06.182991+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime,

    Trace Anomaly of a Conformally Invariant Quantum Field in Curved Spacetime , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.1477 , url =

  2. [2]

    Regularization of the Stress-Energy Tensor for Vector and Scalar Particles Propagating in a General Background Metric , author =. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) ,. 1977 ,. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(77)90313-X , pages =

  3. [3]

    Static Symmetric Solutions of the Semi-Classical

    Sanders, Ko , date =. Static Symmetric Solutions of the Semi-Classical. doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01115-3 , url =. 2007.14311 , eprinttype =

  4. [4]

    The charged vacuum in over-critical fields

    Rafelski, Johann and Muller, Berndt and Greiner, W. The charged vacuum in over-critical fields. Nucl. Phys. B. 1974. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90333-2

  5. [5]

    Catarina and B

    Density-matrix renormalization group: a pedagogical introduction , volume =. The European Physical Journal B , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-023-00575-2 , abstract =

  6. [6]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Duality in field theory and statistical systems , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1980 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.52.453 , language =

  7. [7]

    Global optimization of

    Garcıa-Molina, Paula and Tagliacozzo, Luca and Garcıa-Ripoll, Juan Jose , file =. Global optimization of

  8. [8]

    and Verstraete, F

    Matrix product state representations , volume =. Quantum Information and Computation , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.26421/QIC7.5-6-1 , abstract =

  9. [9]

    The European Physical Journal D , author =

    Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies , volume =. The European Physical Journal D , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8 , abstract =

  10. [10]

    Schollwöck,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326(1), 96 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , volume =. Annals of Physics , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 , abstract =

  11. [11]

    Codebases4 URLhttps://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4

    The. SciPost Physics Codebases , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4 , abstract =

  12. [12]

    Fradkin, Eduardo , month = feb, year =. Field. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015509 , abstract =

  13. [13]

    Learning to Forecast: The Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting Challenge,

    Improved approximation and visualization of the correlation matrix , volume =. The American statistician , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1080/00031305.2023.2186952 , abstract =

  14. [14]

    Entanglement scaling and correlations of the

    Cole, Richard and Pollmann, Frank and Betouras, Joseph , month = feb, year =. Entanglement scaling and correlations of the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1702.02664 , abstract =

  15. [15]

    Annals of Physics , author =

    The one-dimensional. Annals of Physics , author =. 1970 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8 , abstract =

  16. [16]

    2007 , file =

    Interacting. 2007 , file =

  17. [17]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Exact bounds on the energy gap of transverse-field. Physical Review B , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.064204 , abstract =

  18. [18]

    An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems

    An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems , volume =. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1979 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.659 , language =

  19. [19]

    and Seiler, E

    Osterwalder, K. and Seiler, E. , month = feb, year =. Gauge field theories on a lattice , volume =. Annals of Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(78)90039-8 , abstract =

  20. [20]

    Sachdev, Subir , year =. Quantum. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511973765 , abstract =

  21. [21]

    Transverse

    Litens, Christopher , file =. Transverse

  22. [22]

    and Divakaran, Uma and Rosenbaum, Thomas F

    Dutta, Amit and Aeppli, Gabriel and Chakrabarti, Bikas K. and Divakaran, Uma and Rosenbaum, Thomas F. and Sen, Diptiman , month = jun, year =. Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: from statistical physics to quantum information , shorttitle =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1012.0653 , abstract =

  23. [23]

    The quantum ising chain for beginners,

    The quantum. SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.82 , abstract =

  24. [24]

    Verstraete and J

    Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , volume =. Physical Review B , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423 , abstract =

  25. [25]

    Journal of Statistical Software , author =

    The. Journal of Statistical Software , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i01 , abstract =

  26. [26]

    False vacuum decay in quantum spin chains

  27. [27]

    Decay of the metastable phase in and

  28. [28]

    Physical Review B , author =

    Decay of the metastable phase in d = 1 and d = 2. Physical Review B , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.14525 , language =

  29. [29]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Digital quantum simulation of cosmological particle creation with. Scientific Reports , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87015-6 , abstract =

  30. [30]

    Pan, Gaopei and Meng, Zi Yang , year =. Sign. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00095-0 , abstract =

  31. [31]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Real-time simulation of the. Physical Review D , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114501 , abstract =

  32. [32]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Simulating fermion production in 1+1 dimensional. Physical Review D , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.105006 , abstract =

  33. [33]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Fermion pair production in a strong electric field , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 1992 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4659 , language =

  34. [34]

    Physical Review X , author =

    Confinement and string breaking for. Physical Review X , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041040 , abstract =

  35. [36]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , author =

    The mass spectrum of the. Journal of High Energy Physics , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)158 , abstract =

  36. [37]

    and Rackauckas, C

    Dixit, Vaibhav Kumar and Rackauckas, Christopher , month = mar, year =. Optimization.jl:. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7738525 , abstract =

  37. [38]

    Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories

    Hamiltonian formulation of. Physical Review D , author =. 1975 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395 , language =

  38. [39]

    Energetics of

    Alves, Óscar and Pezzutto, Marco and Omar, Yasser , month = jan, year =. Energetics of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.03141 , abstract =

  39. [40]

    Waintal, C.-H

    Waintal, Xavier and Huang, Chen-How and Groth, Christoph W. , month = jan, year =. Who can compete with quantum computers?. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.03035 , abstract =

  40. [41]

    Physical Review Letters , author =

    Experimental. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.260201 , language =

  41. [42]

    , month = nov, year =

    Viermann, Celia and Sparn, Marius and Liebster, Nikolas and Hans, Maurus and Kath, Elinor and Parra-López, Álvaro and Tolosa-Simeón, Mireia and Sánchez-Kuntz, Natalia and Haas, Tobias and Strobel, Helmut and Floerchinger, Stefan and Oberthaler, Markus K. , month = nov, year =. Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime , volume =. Nature , p...

  42. [43]

    Experimental observation of curved light-cones in a quantum field simulator , volume =

    Tajik, Mohammadamin and Gluza, Marek and Sebe, Nicolas and Schüttelkopf, Philipp and Cataldini, Federica and Sabino, João and Møller, Frederik and Ji, Si-Cong and Erne, Sebastian and Guarnieri, Giacomo and Sotiriadis, Spyros and Eisert, Jens and Schmiedmayer, Jörg , month = may, year =. Experimental observation of curved light-cones in a quantum field sim...

  43. [44]

    Quantum dynamics of cosmological particle production: interacting quantum field theories with matrix product states

    Budd, Evan and Florio, Adrien and Frenklakh, David and Mukherjee, Swagato , month = jan, year =. Quantum dynamics of cosmological particle production: interacting quantum field theories with matrix product states , shorttitle =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.02331 , abstract =

  44. [45]

    Emergent

    Cheng, Yanting and Zhai, Hui , month = sep, year =. Emergent. Nature Reviews Physics , publisher =. doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00749-6 , abstract =

  45. [46]

    and Muschik, Christine A

    Martinez, Esteban A. and Muschik, Christine A. and Schindler, Philipp and Nigg, Daniel and Erhard, Alexander and Heyl, Markus and Hauke, Philipp and Dalmonte, Marcello and Monz, Thomas and Zoller, Peter and Blatt, Rainer , month = jun, year =. Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer , volume =. Nature , publisher =. ...

  46. [47]

    Quantum simulation of fundamental physics , volume =

    Zohar, Erez , month = jun, year =. Quantum simulation of fundamental physics , volume =. Nature , publisher =. doi:10.1038/534480a , abstract =

  47. [48]

    Garay, L. J. and Anglin, J. R. and Cirac, J. I. and Zoller, P. , month = nov, year =. Sonic. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4643 , abstract =

  48. [49]

    Annalen der Physik , author =

    Bosonization for. Annalen der Physik , author =. 1998 , note =. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199811)7:4<225::AID-ANDP225>3.0.CO;2-L , abstract =

  49. [50]

    & Verstraete, F

    Haegeman, Jutho and Lubich, Christian and Oseledets, Ivan and Vandereycken, Bart and Verstraete, Frank , month = oct, year =. Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165116 , abstract =

  50. [51]

    Haegeman, J

    Haegeman, Jutho and Cirac, J. Ignacio and Osborne, Tobias J. and Pižorn, Iztok and Verschelde, Henri and Verstraete, Frank , month = aug, year =. Time-. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.070601 , abstract =

  51. [52]

    and Vidal, G

    Orús, R. and Vidal, G. , month = oct, year =. Infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm beyond unitary evolution , volume =. Physical Review B , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.155117 , abstract =

  52. [53]

    von Delft, Jan and Zaránd, Gergely and Fabrizio, Michele , month = jul, year =. Finite-. Physical Review Letters , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.196 , abstract =

  53. [54]

    Quantum , author =

    Classical. Quantum , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.22331/q-2020-10-28-351 , abstract =

  54. [55]

    Annals of Physics , author =

    Charge shielding and quark confinement in the massive schwinger model , volume =. Annals of Physics , author =. 1975 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90212-2 , abstract =

  55. [56]

    Annals of Physics , author =

    More about the massive. Annals of Physics , author =. 1976 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90280-3 , abstract =

  56. [57]

    Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model

    Quantum sine-. Physical Review D , author =. 1975 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2088 , language =

  57. [58]

    Lattice fermions , volume =

    Susskind, Leonard , month = nov, year =. Lattice fermions , volume =. Physical Review D , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.3031 , abstract =

  58. [59]

    Regularization and renormalization of quantum field theory in curved space-time , url =

  59. [61]

    Physics Reports , author =

    Advances in. Physics Reports , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.01.003 , abstract =

  60. [62]

    Physical Review D , author =

    3+1. Physical Review D , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.116007 , abstract =

  61. [63]

    Annals of Physics , author =

    On. Annals of Physics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169855 , abstract =

  62. [64]

    1994 , note =

    Quantization of. 1994 , note =

  63. [65]

    Davoudi, (2025), arXiv:2507.15840 [hep-lat]

    Davoudi, Zohreh , month = sep, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.15840 , abstract =

  64. [66]

    , month = dec, year =

    Steane, Andrew M. , month = dec, year =. An introduction to spinors , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1312.3824 , abstract =

  65. [67]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Series. Physical Review D , author =. 1997 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.55 , abstract =

  66. [68]

    Physical Review D , author =

    A. Physical Review D , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.034508 , abstract =

  67. [69]

    Carroll, Allen and Kogut, John and Sinclair, D. K. and Susskind, Leonard , month = apr, year =. Lattice gauge theory calculations in 1 + 1 dimensions and the approach to the continuum limit , volume =. Physical Review D , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2270 , abstract =

  68. [70]

    and Susskind, Leonard and Kogut, John , month = feb, year =

    Banks, T. and Susskind, Leonard and Kogut, John , month = feb, year =. Strong-coupling calculations of lattice gauge theories: (1 + 1)-dimensional exercises , volume =. Physical Review D , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.1043 , abstract =

  69. [71]

    title Confinement of quarks

    Wilson, Kenneth G. , year =. Confinement of quarks , url =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445 , journal =

  70. [72]

    Arguello Cruz, G

    Cruz, Erick Arguello and Tarnopolsky, Grigory and Xin, Yuan , month = dec, year =. Precision study of the massive. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.01902 , abstract =

  71. [73]

    Dempsey, I

    Dempsey, Ross and Klebanov, Igor R. and Pufu, Silviu S. and Zan, Bernardo , month = feb, year =. Discrete. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.05308 , abstract =

  72. [74]

    and Klein, Abraham , year =

    Rafelski, Johann and Fulcher, Lewis P. and Klein, Abraham , year =. Fermions and. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90116-3 , journal =

  73. [75]

    Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , author =

    Discussion of the infinite distribution of electrons in the theory of the positron , volume =. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , author =. 1934 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S030500410001656X , number =

  74. [76]

    Schwinger, Julian S. ,. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization , volume =. 1951 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.82.664 , journal =

  75. [77]

    The renormalized locally covariant. Rev. Math. Phys. , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1142/S0129055X13300124 , number =

  76. [78]

    and Verch, Rainer , year =

    Fewster, Christopher J. and Verch, Rainer , year =. The. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/23/235027 , journal =. 1307.5242 , eprinttype =

  77. [79]

    and Cahn, Robert N

    Brown, Lowell S. and Cahn, Robert N. and McLerran, Larry D. , year =. Vacuum. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.581 , journal =

  78. [80]

    , year =

    Wald, Robert M. , year =. The. doi:10.1007/BF01609833 , journal =

  79. [81]

    , year =

    Hollands, Stefan and Wald, Robert M. , year =. Quantum fields in curved spacetime , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.02.001 , journal =. 1401.2026 , eprinttype =

  80. [82]

    The current density in quantum electrodynamics in external potentials , volume =

    Schlemmer, Jan and Zahn, Jochen , year =. The current density in quantum electrodynamics in external potentials , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.04.006 , journal =. 1501.05912 , eprinttype =

Showing first 80 references.