pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02848 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying into the Higgs boson and a new scalar particle in the bbar{b}bbar{b} final state using proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords heavy scalar resonanceHiggs bosonbbbb final statebeyond standard modelupper limitsCMS detector13 TeVsupersymmetric models
0
0 comments X

The pith

CMS search finds no significant signal for new heavy scalar X decaying to Higgs and Y in bbbb final state

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a search for a new heavy scalar resonance X decaying into the standard model Higgs boson and a new scalar Y, both decaying to bottom quark pairs, using proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment. With an integrated luminosity of 138 inverse femtobarns, the analysis examines the four b-jet final state over a broad range of masses for X from 400 GeV to 1.6 TeV and Y from 60 GeV to 1.4 TeV. The data shows good agreement with the expected standard model backgrounds, and no new resonance is discovered. Although a local excess of 3.47 standard deviations appears at X=600 GeV and Y=400 GeV, the global significance is only 2.44 standard deviations, indicating it is likely a statistical fluctuation. The study derives 95% confidence level upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction for the signal process.

Core claim

The observations are in agreement with the background-only hypothesis. The largest excess, with a local (global) significance of 3.47 (2.44) standard deviations, is observed for hypothetical X and Y masses of 600 and 400 GeV, respectively. Upper limits at 95% confidence level on the production cross section times branching fraction are presented for signal mass hypotheses in the range of the search. Results are interpreted within the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model scenario.

What carries the argument

The reconstruction of two dijet systems from four b-tagged jets to identify the Higgs boson and the new scalar Y, with a search for a peak in the distribution of the invariant mass of the combined system corresponding to the heavy resonance X.

If this is right

  • The results constrain possible new scalar particles in extensions of the standard model.
  • Upper limits exclude certain production rates for X and Y in the probed mass ranges.
  • No evidence supports the existence of such resonances in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model.
  • Additional data from future LHC runs could improve these limits or reveal a signal if present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed mild excess might be investigated further with more data or different analysis techniques to confirm if it persists.
  • This search complements other LHC analyses looking for extended Higgs sectors in different final states.
  • If similar excesses appear in independent channels, it could motivate dedicated follow-up studies on potential new physics.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo simulations used to model the standard model backgrounds and signal efficiencies provide an accurate description of the observed data in the four b-jet events.

What would settle it

A reanalysis or new dataset showing the local significance at 600 and 400 GeV masses rising above 5 standard deviations globally would indicate the presence of a new resonance rather than a background fluctuation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02848 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Depiction of the process under investigation, X view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Event distributions in the validation regions for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Event distributions in the signal region for view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distributions of the events in the (mXreco, mYreco) plane observed in the SR(4b). The upper plots show events in data (left) and the background model (right). The lower plot shows the distribution of events for the signal hypothesis corresponding to mX = 700 GeV and mY = 400 GeV. In each plot, there are empty bins in the high-mXreco and low-mYreco region. These areas have been excluded because the events h… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Expected (left) and observed (right) 95% CL upper limits on view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A search for a new heavy scalar resonance (X) decaying into the 125 GeV standard model Higgs boson (H) and a new scalar particle (Y) in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV is presented. The analysis is performed using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the CMS detector during LHC Run 2. The $\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}$ final state is used as a probe to search for phenomena beyond the standard model where, in the X $\to$ YH process, the Y and H each decay into a bottom quark-antiquark pair. A range of masses from 400 GeV to 1.6 TeV for the resonance X and from 60 GeV to 1.4 TeV for the scalar Y is investigated. The observations are in agreement with the background-only hypothesis. The largest excess, with a local (global) significance of 3.47 (2.44) standard deviations, is observed for hypothetical X and Y masses of 600 and 400 GeV, respectively. Upper limits at 95% confidence level on the production cross section times branching fraction are presented for signal mass hypotheses in the range of the search. Results are interpreted within the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model scenario.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a search for a new heavy scalar resonance X decaying to the 125 GeV SM Higgs boson H and a new scalar Y, with both H and Y decaying to b b-bar pairs, using 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp collision data recorded with the CMS detector. The search spans X masses 400 GeV–1.6 TeV and Y masses 60 GeV–1.4 TeV in the bbbb final state. No significant excess over the background-only hypothesis is found; the largest deviation has local (global) significance 3.47 (2.44) sigma at m_X=600 GeV, m_Y=400 GeV. 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction are reported for all tested mass hypotheses, with results interpreted in the NMSSM.

Significance. If the background modeling and limit-setting procedure hold, the result meaningfully constrains extended Higgs sectors, particularly NMSSM scenarios with additional scalars. The analysis uses standard CMS MC-based signal modeling, data-driven background estimation, and asymptotic CL_s limits with proper local-to-global significance correction, providing a clean null result that strengthens exclusion bounds in the bbbb channel.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the global significance correctly but does not explicitly note the number of trials or the look-elsewhere effect calculation method; adding a brief clause referencing the asymptotic formula or toy-based procedure used would improve clarity for readers.
  2. Section on systematic uncertainties (presumably §6 or equivalent) should tabulate the dominant sources (e.g., b-tagging efficiency, jet energy scale) with their impact on the final limits for the benchmark point at 600/400 GeV to allow direct assessment of robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript, including the recognition that the analysis employs standard CMS techniques for signal modeling, data-driven background estimation, and asymptotic CL_s limits with appropriate significance corrections. We appreciate the recommendation to accept the paper, as it confirms that the null result provides meaningful constraints on extended Higgs sectors such as the NMSSM.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct data-to-MC comparison with standard statistical interpretation

full rationale

The paper reports a search for X → YH → bbbb using 138 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV data. The central claim (agreement with background-only hypothesis, local/global significances, and 95% CL upper limits) is obtained by comparing observed events in data to Monte Carlo predictions for SM backgrounds and signal hypotheses, followed by a standard profile-likelihood fit and asymptotic CLs limit setting. No equation or procedure reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that bears the result, and the background modeling is not defined in terms of the signal excess being tested. The analysis chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (collision data and independently generated MC).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The search rests on standard Monte Carlo modeling of backgrounds and signal acceptance; no new free parameters are introduced beyond conventional fit parameters for limits.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model background processes are correctly modeled by Monte Carlo simulations in the bbbb final state
    Invoked to estimate expected background yields and shapes for the significance calculation.
invented entities (2)
  • Heavy scalar resonance X no independent evidence
    purpose: Hypothesized new particle decaying to YH
    Postulated signal hypothesis for which limits are set; no independent evidence provided.
  • New scalar particle Y no independent evidence
    purpose: Hypothesized decay product of X that also decays to bb
    Part of the signal model; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5583 in / 1361 out tokens · 36865 ms · 2026-05-08T02:13:41.645802+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model higgs boson with the atlas detector at the lhc.Physics Letters B2012;716(1):1–29

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Phys.Lett

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model”,Phys. Rep.496(2010) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001, arXiv:0910.1785. References 17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 2010

  5. [5]

    The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed

    M. Maniatis, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 3505,doi:10.1142/S0217751X10049827, arXiv:0906.0777

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x10049827 2010

  6. [6]

    Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios

    T. Robens, T. Stefaniak, and J. Wittbrodt, “Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 151, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x,arXiv:1908.08554

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x 2020

  7. [7]

    Gravity particles from warped extra dimensions, predictions for LHC

    A. Carvalho, “Gravity particles from warped extra dimensions, predictions for LHC”, 2014.arXiv:1404.0102

    work page arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Simultaneous search for extra light and heavy Higgs bosons via cascade decays

    U. Ellwanger and M. Rodriguez-Vazquez, “Simultaneous search for extra light and heavy Higgs bosons via cascade decays”,JHEP11(2017) 008, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)008,arXiv:1707.08522

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)008 2017

  9. [9]

    Probing the CP-even Higgs sector viaH 3 →H 2H1 in the natural next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model

    Z. Kang et al., “Probing the CP-even Higgs sector viaH 3 →H 2H1 in the natural next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model”,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 015006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.015006,arXiv:1301.0453

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.015006 2013

  10. [10]

    Discovery prospects for NMSSM Higgs bosons at the high-energy Large Hadron Collider

    S. F. King, M. M ¨uhlleitner, R. Nevzorov, and K. Walz, “Discovery prospects for NMSSM Higgs bosons at the high-energy Large Hadron Collider”,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 095014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.095014,arXiv:1408.1120

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.095014 2014

  11. [11]

    Alignment limit of the NMSSM Higgs sector

    M. Carena et al., “Alignment limit of the NMSSM Higgs sector”,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 035013,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.035013,arXiv:1510.09137

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.035013 2016

  12. [12]

    Discovery prospects of a light scalar in the NMSSM

    U. Ellwanger and M. Rodriguez-Vazquez, “Discovery prospects of a light scalar in the NMSSM”,JHEP02(2016) 096,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)096, arXiv:1512.04281

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)096 2016

  13. [13]

    Singlet extensions of the standard model at LHC Run 2: benchmarks and comparison with the NMSSM

    R. Costa, M. M ¨uhlleitner, M. O. P . Sampaio, and R. Santos, “Singlet extensions of the standard model at LHC Run 2: benchmarks and comparison with the NMSSM”,JHEP 06(2016) 034,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)034,arXiv:1512.05355

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)034 2016

  14. [14]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a resonance decaying into a scalar particle and a Higgs boson in the final state with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP11(2024) 047, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)047,arXiv:2404.12915

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)047 2024

  15. [15]

    Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP05(2024) 316,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)316, arXiv:2310.01643

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)316 2024

  16. [16]

    Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into two lighter Higgs bosons in theττbb final state at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into two lighter Higgs bosons in theττbb final state at 13 TeV”,JHEP11(2021) 057, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)057,arXiv:2106.10361

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)057 2021

  17. [17]

    Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology”,Phys. Lett. B842 (2023) 137392,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137392,arXiv:2204.12413

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137392 2023

  18. [18]

    Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances

    CMS Collaboration, “Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances”,Phys. Rept.(2025) 368,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004, arXiv:2403.16926. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004 2025

  19. [19]

    Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models

    C. Cs ´aki, J. Hubisz, and S. J. Lee, “Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models”,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 125015,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.125015, arXiv:0705.3844

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.125015 2007

  20. [20]

    Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production

    M. Gouzevitch et al., “Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production”,JHEP07(2013) 148, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)148,arXiv:1303.6636

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2013)148 2013

  21. [21]

    Exploring the Higgs sector of a most natural NMSSM

    R. Barbieri et al., “Exploring the Higgs sector of a most natural NMSSM”,Phys. Rev. D 87(2013) 115018,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.115018,arXiv:1304.3670

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.115018 2013

  22. [22]

    Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV”,JHEP08(2018) 152, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)152,arXiv:1806.03548

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2018)152 2018

  23. [23]

    Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the b bbb final state using proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the b bbb final state using proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP01 (2019) 30,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)030,arXiv:1804.06174

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)030 2019

  24. [24]

    Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in theb ¯bb¯b final state usingppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in theb ¯bb¯b final state usingppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 092002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.092002,arXiv:2202.07288

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.092002 2022

  25. [25]

    Search for Higgs boson pair production in events with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson pair production in events with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B778 (2018) 101,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.001,arXiv:1707.02909

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.001 2018

  26. [26]

    Combination of searches for heavy resonances decaying into bosonic and leptonic final states using 36 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Combination of searches for heavy resonances decaying into bosonic and leptonic final states using 36 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 052008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.052008,arXiv:1808.02380

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.052008 2018

  27. [27]

    Search for Higgs boson pair production in theγγb b final state in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson pair production in theγγb b final state in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 7, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.056,arXiv:1806.00408

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.056 2019

  28. [28]

    Search for resonant and nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbℓνℓνfinal state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for resonant and nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbℓνℓνfinal state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP01(2018) 54, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)054,arXiv:1708.04188

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)054 2018

  29. [29]

    Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in thebbZZ channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in thebbZZ channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 032003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.032003,arXiv:2006.06391

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.032003 2020

  30. [30]

    Search for Higgs boson pairs decaying to WW*WW*, WW*ττ, and ττττ in proton-proton collisions at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson pairs decaying to WW*WW*, WW*ττ, and ττττin proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP07(2023) 095, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)095,arXiv:2206.10268

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)095 2023

  31. [31]

    Combination of searches for resonant Higgs boson pair production using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Combination of searches for resonant Higgs boson pair production using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(2024) 231801,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.231801,arXiv:2311.15956

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.231801 2024

  32. [32]

    Combination of Searches for Higgs Boson Pair Production in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math> Collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> with the ATLAS Detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Combination of searches for Higgs boson pair production in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 101801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.101801,arXiv:2406.09971. References 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.101801 2024

  33. [33]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.154245

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.154245 2026

  34. [34]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  35. [35]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  36. [36]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  37. [37]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  38. [38]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  39. [39]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  40. [40]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  41. [41]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  42. [42]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005,arXiv:1809.02816

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10005 2018

  43. [43]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  44. [44]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  45. [45]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  46. [46]

    Cacciari, G.P

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  47. [47]

    Cacciari, G.P

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097. 20

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  48. [48]

    The CMS Phase-1 pixel detector - experience and lessons learned from two years of operation

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS Phase-1 pixel detector - experience and lessons learned from two years of operation”,JINST14(2019) C07008, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/C07008

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/c07008 2019

  49. [49]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018,arXiv:2003.00503

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018 2020

  50. [50]

    Jet flavour classification using DeepJet

    E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”,JINST15(2020) P12012, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012,arXiv:2008.10519

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020

  51. [51]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018

  52. [52]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  53. [53]

    Ball, et al., JHEP04, 040 (2015)

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  54. [54]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428

    work page Pith review doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017

  55. [55]

    NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP07(2008) 060, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060,arXiv:0805.4802

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060 2008

  56. [56]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  57. [57]

    Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders”,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021,arXiv:1112.5675

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021 2014

  58. [58]

    Vector boson pair production at the LHC

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, “Vector boson pair production at the LHC”, JHEP07(2011) 018,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)018,arXiv:1105.0020

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2011)018 2011

  59. [59]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  60. [60]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  61. [61]

    Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-16-003, 2017

    2017

  62. [62]

    A Deep Neural Network for Simultaneous Estimation of b Jet Energy and Resolution

    CMS Collaboration, “A deep neural network for simultaneous estimation of b jet energy and resolution”,Comput. Softw. Big Sci.4(2020) 10, doi:10.1007/s41781-020-00041-z,arXiv:1912.06046

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-020-00041-z 2020

  63. [63]

    Fitting of event topologies with external kinematic constraints in CMS

    J. D’Hondt et al., “Fitting of event topologies with external kinematic constraints in CMS”, CMS Note CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-023, 2006. References 21

    2006

  64. [64]

    Reweighting with boosted decision trees

    A. Rogozhnikov, “Reweighting with boosted decision trees”,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.762(2016) 012036,doi:10.1088/1742-6596/762/1/012036,arXiv:1608.05806

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/762/1/012036 2016

  65. [65]

    Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Volume I

    I. M. Chakravarti, R. G. Laha, and J. Roy, “Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Volume I”. John Wiley and Sons, 1967

    1967

  66. [66]

    Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2018) 161,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161, arXiv:1802.02613

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)161 2018

  67. [67]

    Search for Higgs Boson Pair Production in the Four <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math> Quark Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson pair production in the four b quark final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 081802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.081802,arXiv:2202.09617

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.081802 2022

  68. [68]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015

  69. [69]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    2017

  70. [70]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    2018

  71. [71]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024

  72. [72]

    The RooFit toolkit for data modeling

    W. Verkerke and D. P . Kirkby, “The RooFit toolkit for data modeling”,eConf0303241 (2003) MOLT007,doi:10.48550/arXiv.physics/0306116, arXiv:physics/0306116

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0306116 2003

  73. [73]

    The ROOSTATSproject

    L. Moneta et al., “The RooStats Project”,PoSACAT2010(2010) 057, doi:10.22323/1.093.0057,arXiv:1009.1003

    work page doi:10.22323/1.093.0057 2010

  74. [74]

    Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    work page Pith review doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999

  75. [75]

    Presentation of search results: the CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: theCL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002

  76. [76]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  77. [77]

    Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics

    E. Gross and O. Vitells, “Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 525,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8, arXiv:1005.1891

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8 2010

  78. [78]

    Estimating the significance of a signal in a multi-dimensional search

    O. Vitells and E. Gross, “Estimating the significance of a signal in a multi-dimensional search”,Astropart. Phys.35(2011) 230, doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2011.08.005,arXiv:1105.4355. 22

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2011.08.005 2011

  79. [79]

    Benchmark planes for Higgs-to-Higgs decays in the NMSSM

    U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, “Benchmark planes for Higgs-to-Higgs decays in the NMSSM”,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 406,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10364-3, arXiv:2203.05049. 23 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, Austria W. Adam , L. Benato ...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10364-3 2022