arxiv: 2605.02966 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.MS

Recognition: unknown

QBalance: A Reproducible Multi-Objective Workflow for Quantum Compilation, Noise Suppression, and Error-Mitigation Strategy Selection

Soumyadip Sarkar

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.MS

keywords quantum workflowsmulti-objective optimizationerror mitigationcompilation strategiesreproducibilitynoise suppressionstrategy selection

0 comments

The pith

QBalance models quantum strategy selection as a finite multi-objective problem to produce reproducible workflow artifacts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents QBalance, a Python library built on Qiskit, that orchestrates choices among qubit layout, routing, gate suppression, measurement mitigation, and related policies for quantum circuits. It casts the task as a finite multi-objective strategy-selection problem and derives a weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, and Bayesian linear surrogate for ordering candidates. A sympathetic reader would care because near-term quantum results depend on tightly coupled compilation and execution decisions that are hard to reproduce across runs or teams. The work also states its own boundaries, including that the bandit mechanism orders but does not cut the number of evaluations and that the layout heuristic is only partially topology-aware.

Core claim

QBalance provides a reproducible orchestration and artifact model for quantum workflow studies by formulating strategy selection over circuits, backends, and transformation policies as a finite multi-objective problem, deriving the implemented weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, Bayesian linear candidate-ordering surrogate, and distributional diagnostics while positioning the system against Qiskit pass managers, SABRE routing, randomized compiling, dynamical decoupling, zero-noise extrapolation, and related methods.

What carries the argument

The finite multi-objective strategy-selection problem, which applies a weighted objective and non-dominated selection rule to balance compilation, noise-suppression, and error-mitigation choices across circuits and backends.

If this is right

It supports dataset-level selection among compilation, noise-suppression, and error-mitigation strategies.
It supplies concrete components including the survival-product error proxy and Bayesian linear surrogate for ordering.
It places the workflow relative to existing Qiskit pass-manager and SABRE-style tools.
It identifies concrete limits such as the greedy layout heuristic and the fact that the bandit mechanism does not reduce candidate evaluations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same orchestration layer could be extended to include circuit-cutting reconstruction or shot-budget allocation as additional objectives.
Replacing the current greedy layout step with a topology-aware search might improve selection quality on larger devices.
Integrating the artifact model into shared experiment repositories could standardize how quantum results are reported and compared.

Load-bearing premise

The weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, and Bayesian linear surrogate together capture the coupled compilation and execution choices without separate external validation of those proxies.

What would settle it

Comparing measured fidelity or error rates on hardware for strategies chosen by the non-dominated rule against those not chosen, to check whether the selected set consistently performs better.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02966 by Soumyadip Sarkar.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Dataset-level QBalance workflow. The system is an orchestration layer over compilation, suppression, execution, mitigation, scoring, and artifact persistence rather than a replacement for Qiskit’s low-level compiler. 4.2 Strategy Specification A strategy specification is an immutable object with five groups of knobs: 1. Compilation: optimization level, layout method, routing method, translation method, an… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Default candidate-space composition in QBalance version 0.1.0. The total is 23, although user-facing examples commonly set a maximum of 24. 4.4 Backend and Optional Dependency Model QBalance resolves backend strings through plugin entry points. The package declares built-in backend entry points for fake and Aer backends. Optional extras control whether Aer simulation, Runtime helper support, M3, circuit cu… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Near-term quantum workloads are shaped by coupled compilation and execution choices: qubit layout, routing, basis translation, gate suppression, measurement mitigation, shot budget, and artifact reproducibility. This paper analyzes QBalance, a Python workflow library for dataset-level selection among quantum compilation, noise-suppression, and error-mitigation strategies built on the Qiskit ecosystem. The contribution is formulated as a finite multi-objective strategy-selection problem over circuits, backends, and transformation policies. The manuscript derives the implemented weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, Bayesian linear candidate-ordering surrogate, and distributional diagnostics. It also positions the system relative to established work on Qiskit pass-manager compilation, SABRE-style routing, randomized compiling, dynamical decoupling, zero-noise extrapolation, matrix-free measurement mitigation, circuit cutting, and Thompson sampling. The analysis shows that QBalance provides a reproducible orchestration and artifact model for quantum workflow studies. It also establishes precise limitations: the current bandit mechanism orders candidates but does not reduce the number of candidate evaluations, the custom layout heuristic is greedy and only partially topology-aware, the implemented ZNE helper is parity-centered, and the cutting integration is a hook rather than a full reconstruction pipeline.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

QBalance is a descriptive tools paper that packages Qiskit-based compilation and mitigation choices into a multi-objective workflow with some custom proxies, but stays short on empirical validation.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper describes QBalance, a Python library that turns quantum compilation, routing, noise suppression, and mitigation strategy selection into a structured multi-objective problem with a weighted objective, non-dominated rule, survival-product error proxy, and Bayesian linear surrogate for ordering candidates. It builds directly on Qiskit passes, SABRE, ZNE, dynamical decoupling, and Thompson sampling while adding a few custom pieces like the greedy layout heuristic and the survival-product proxy. The manuscript is clear about its own boundaries, noting that the bandit only orders candidates without cutting evaluations, the layout heuristic is only partially topology-aware, ZNE is parity-centered, and cutting is just a hook. That level of self-reporting is useful and keeps the claims grounded in what the system actually delivers. The work does a reasonable job of positioning the library against prior components and emphasizing reproducibility through defined artifacts and diagnostics. The formulation itself looks internally consistent for a descriptive contribution. The soft spots are the absence of any reported benchmarks or head-to-head comparisons that would show whether the custom proxies or selection rules produce better or more consistent results than ad-hoc choices in practice. Without those numbers, it is difficult to gauge real-world utility beyond the convenience of having the pieces in one place. The derived components also carry the circularity risk the abstract itself flags, since they depend on weights and hyperparameters that may need external checks. This paper is aimed at experimental groups that run repeated near-term workloads and want a standardized, artifact-producing pipeline rather than at readers looking for new algorithmic or hardware insights. A practitioner focused on workflow reproducibility would find the orchestration model and limitation list worth reading. It is concrete enough and honest enough to deserve a serious referee as a tools contribution, even though the core ideas extend existing methods. I would send it out for peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces QBalance, a Python workflow library for multi-objective strategy selection among quantum compilation, noise-suppression, and error-mitigation approaches built on the Qiskit ecosystem. It formulates the task as a finite multi-objective selection problem over circuits, backends, and transformation policies; derives a weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, and Bayesian linear surrogate for candidate ordering; positions the implementation against prior Qiskit pass-manager, SABRE, ZNE, and Thompson-sampling work; and explicitly catalogs its own limitations (bandit orders but does not reduce evaluations, greedy layout heuristic, parity-centered ZNE, cutting as a hook). The central claim is that QBalance supplies a reproducible orchestration and artifact model for quantum workflow studies.

Significance. If the internal derivations are consistent, the paper delivers a documented, reproducible workflow system with self-identified limitations rather than unsubstantiated optimality claims. This is a constructive contribution to near-term quantum computing, where coupled compilation and execution choices are common; the explicit artifact model and catalog of limitations (including that the bandit does not reduce evaluations) enable systematic follow-on studies. Credit is given for the reproducible code and for framing the work as descriptive orchestration rather than predictive validation.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the Bayesian linear surrogate is derived, yet provides no indication of its feature set or how it avoids reducing to a fitted parameter; a one-sentence clarification in the derivation paragraph would remove ambiguity about whether the surrogate is internally self-referential.
[Limitations discussion] The limitations paragraph notes that 'the bandit mechanism orders candidates but does not reduce the number of candidate evaluations'; adding a short quantitative illustration (e.g., number of evaluations before/after ordering on a toy circuit) would make this limitation concrete without altering the descriptive claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their accurate summary of the manuscript, recognition of its constructive framing as a documented workflow system rather than an optimality claim, and recommendation for minor revision. The report correctly notes our explicit catalog of limitations, including that the bandit orders but does not reduce evaluations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript describes QBalance as a Python workflow library implementing a finite multi-objective strategy-selection problem for quantum compilation and mitigation choices. It states that the weighted objective, non-dominated selection rule, survival-product error proxy, and Bayesian linear surrogate are derived and implemented within the system, while explicitly cataloguing limitations and situating the work against external prior art (Qiskit, SABRE, ZNE, etc.). The central claim is that the library supplies a reproducible orchestration and artifact model; this is supported directly by the delivered description, code structure, and self-documented constraints rather than by any predictive claim that reduces to fitted parameters or self-citation chains. No load-bearing step equates an output quantity to its own inputs by construction, and the formulation remains self-contained against the external benchmarks it references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited to abstract; the multi-objective formulation and custom proxies rest on chosen weights and internal definitions whose independence from the target selection outcomes is not demonstrated.

free parameters (2)

Objective weights
The implemented weighted objective requires selection of weights balancing compilation cost, noise suppression, and error mitigation.
Bayesian surrogate hyperparameters
The Bayesian linear candidate-ordering surrogate likely depends on chosen or fitted parameters for ordering.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Non-dominated selection on the defined objectives yields useful strategy sets
Invoked in the finite multi-objective strategy-selection problem.
ad hoc to paper The survival-product error proxy is a valid stand-in for error behavior
Derived within the manuscript for distributional diagnostics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1636 out tokens · 144649 ms · 2026-05-10T15:02:50.960428+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning

Agrawal, S., Goyal, N.: Thompson sampling for contextual bandits with linear payoffs. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 28, pp. 127–135. PMLR (2013), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v28/agrawal13.html

2013
[2]

Brańczyk, A.M., Carrera Vazquez, A., Egger, D.J., Fuller, B., Gacon, J., Garrison, J.R.,Glick,J.R.,Johnson,C.,Joshi,S.,Pednault,E.,Pemmaraju,C.D.,Rivero,P., Shehzad, I., Woerner, S.: Qiskit addon: circuit cutting (2024).https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7987997,https://qiskit.github.io/qiskit-addon-cutting/, documentation version inspected on 2026-05-03

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7987997 2024
[3]

Quantum error mitigation,

Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Huggins, W.J., Li, Y., McClean, J.R., O’Brien, T.E.: Quantum error mitigation. Reviews of Modern Physics95(4), 045005 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.045005 2023
[4]

Statistical Methods Related to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm

Darling, D.A.: The kolmogorov-smirnov, cramer-von mises tests. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics28(4), 823–838 (1957).https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/ 1177706788

work page doi:10.1214/aoms/ 1957
[5]

Physical Review X8(3), 031027 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.8.031027

Endo,S.,Benjamin,S.C.,Li,Y.:Practicalquantumerrormitigationfornear-future applications. Physical Review X8(3), 031027 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.8.031027

2018
[6]

IBM Quantum Documentation: Qiskit runtime primitive options, resilience options, and twirling options (2026),https://qiskit.qotlabs.org/docs/api/ qiskit-ibm-runtime/options-estimator-options, official documentation; ac- cessed 2026-05-03

2026
[7]

IBM Quantum Documentation: Transpile with pass managers and generate preset pass manager (2026),https://qiskit.qotlabs.org/api/qiskit/transpiler_ preset, official documentation; accessed 2026-05-03

2026
[8]

Quantum computing with Qiskit

Javadi-Abhari, A., Treinish, M., Krsulich, K., Wood, C.J., Lishman, J., Gacon, J., Martiel, S., Nation, P.D., Bishop, L.S., Cross, A.W., Johnson, B.R., Gambetta, J.M.: Quantum computing with Qiskit. CoRRabs/2405.08810(2024).https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08810,https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08810

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.08810 2024
[9]

Nimble page management for tiered memory systems,

Li, G., Ding, Y., Xie, Y.: Tackling the qubit mapping problem for NISQ-era quan- tum devices. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. pp. 1001–1014. ACM (2019).https://doi.org/10.1145/3297858.3304023 22 S. Sarkar

work page doi:10.1145/3297858.3304023 2019
[10]

github.io/qiskit-addon-mthree/, official documentation; accessed 2026-05-03

Mthree Documentation: mthree 3.0.0 documentation (2026),https://qiskit. github.io/qiskit-addon-mthree/, official documentation; accessed 2026-05-03

2026
[11]

Scalable Mitigation of Measurement Errors on Quantum Computers,

Nation, P.D., Kang, H., Sundaresan, N., Gambetta, J.M.: Scalable mitigation of measurement errors on quantum computers. PRX Quantum2(4), 040326 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040326

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040326 2021
[12]

Qiskit Aer Documentation: AerSimulator api documentation (2026),https:// qiskit.github.io/qiskit-aer/stubs/qiskit_aer.AerSimulator.html, official documentation; accessed 2026-05-03

2026
[13]

Sarkar, S.: qbalance: Balancing workflow library for quantum compilation and mit- igation benchmarking with qiskit (2026),https://github.com/neuralsorcerer/ qbalance, public GitHub repository; source tree inspected on 2026-05-03

2026
[14]

Cutqc: using small quantum computers for large quantum circuit evaluations,

Tang,W.,Tomesh,T.,Suchara,M.,Larson,J.,Martonosi,M.:CutQC:Usingsmall quantum computers for large quantum circuit evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. pp. 473–486. ACM (2021).https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3445814.3446758

work page doi:10.1145/3445814.3446758 2021
[15]

Physical Review Letters119(18), 180509 (2017).https://doi.org/10

Temme, K., Bravyi, S., Gambetta, J.M.: Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Physical Review Letters119(18), 180509 (2017).https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509

2017
[16]

Physical Review Letters82(12), 2417–2421 (1999).https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.2417

Viola, L., Knill, E., Lloyd, S.: Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems. Physical Review Letters82(12), 2417–2421 (1999).https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.2417

1999
[17]

Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via random- ized compiling

Wallman, J.J., Emerson, J.: Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling. Physical Review A94(5), 052325 (2016).https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052325 2016