pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03026 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tunable Odd-Parity Spin Splittings in Altermagnets

Yue Yu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetsodd-parity spin splittingloop-current ordertwo-color drivingFloquet theoryspintronicsPT symmetryspin Hall conductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase-locked two-color light induces a static (P,T)=(-,-) order in altermagnets that yields controllable mixed-parity spin textures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a way to add odd-parity spin splitting to collinear altermagnets, which normally show only even-parity splitting due to their (P,T)=(+,-) symmetry. It does this by inducing a static (P,T)=(-,-) order either through properly phase-locked two-color linearly polarized light or by coupling to a translationally invariant P-odd loop-current order. A reader would care because the resulting mixed-parity spin texture can be tuned by the strength of the drive or the coupling, allowing electrical and optical control over spin-polarized currents. The same mechanism applied to collinear PT-symmetric magnets produces a distinct (P,T)=(+,+) state that carries nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity. The arguments rest on group theory together with microscopic Floquet theory.

Core claim

We develop a theoretical framework to induce odd-parity spin splittings in collinear altermagnets through two mechanisms: driving by a two-color linearly polarized light field or coupling to a P-odd loop-current order. Properly phase-locked two-color driving induces a static (P,T)=(-,-) order, symmetry-equivalent to a translationally invariant P-odd loop-current order. Coupling this order to an altermagnet produces a controllable mixed-parity spin texture. The same mechanism applied to a collinear PT-symmetric magnet induces a distinct (P,T)=(+,+) state with a nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity. Group-theory and microscopic Floquet theory highlight the emergent

What carries the argument

The induced static (P,T)=(-,-) order, symmetry-equivalent to a translationally invariant P-odd loop-current order, which couples to the altermagnet's existing order to generate the mixed-parity spin texture.

If this is right

  • Controllable mixed-parity spin textures become available in the more abundant class of collinear altermagnets.
  • Electrical and optical manipulation of spin-polarized currents is enabled through the tunable order parameter.
  • A distinct (P,T)=(+,+) state with nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity appears in PT-symmetric magnets.
  • New routes open for symmetry-based engineering of spin responses in spintronics devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-engineering principle could be applied to other collinear magnetic systems to combine previously incompatible parity properties.
  • Dynamic control of the induced order via light intensity or phase offers a path to reconfigurable spintronic elements without static structural changes.
  • Experimental tests would likely focus on materials already known to host altermagnetic or PT-symmetric order and that can sustain the required driving fields.

Load-bearing premise

The (P,T)=(-,-) order induced by light or loop current can be realized and coupled to the altermagnet in real materials while preserving the original collinear magnetic order and without invalidating the symmetry analysis or Floquet description.

What would settle it

Observation of momentum-dependent mixed-parity spin splitting in the band structure of a two-color-driven altermagnet, or measurement of nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity in a PT-symmetric magnet under the corresponding driving or coupling conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03026 by Yue Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Four classes of magnetic states classified by ( view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spin-split Fermi surfaces. (Left panel) In the ab view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Light-induced nonrelativistic dissipationless anoma view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The honeycomb lattice for a view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Translationally invariant P-odd loop-current order on bipartite square lattice. Inversion symmetry is on-site. (Left) view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Momentum-dependent spin splitting and its relation to inversion ($P$) and time-reversal ($T$) symmetries are central to nonrelativistic spintronics. Representative examples include collinear altermagnets with $(P,T)=(+,-)$ and non-collinear odd-parity magnets with $(P,T)=(-,+)$. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework to induce odd-parity spin splittings in the more abundant collinear altermagnets through two mechanisms: driving by a two-color linearly polarized light field or coupling to a $P$-odd loop-current order. Properly phase-locked two-color driving induces a static $(P,T)=(-,-)$ order, symmetry-equivalent to a translationally invariant $P$-odd loop-current order. Coupling this order to an altermagnet produces a controllable mixed-parity spin texture, opening new avenues for the electrical and optical manipulation of spin-polarized currents in spintronics applications. The same mechanism applied to a collinear $PT$-symmetric magnet induces a distinct $(P,T)=(+,+)$ state with a nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity. We present group-theory and microscopic Floquet theory to highlight the emergent responses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework to induce odd-parity spin splittings in collinear altermagnets (P,T)=(+,-) via two mechanisms: phase-locked two-color linearly polarized light driving, which generates a static (P,T)=(-,-) order, or coupling to a translationally invariant P-odd loop-current order. This produces a controllable mixed-parity spin texture. The same mechanism applied to collinear PT-symmetric magnets yields a distinct (P,T)=(+,+) state featuring nonrelativistic dissipationless anomalous spin Hall conductivity. The claims rest on group-theory classification of symmetries and microscopic Floquet theory derivations of the emergent responses.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work offers a symmetry-based route to extend nonrelativistic spintronics to the more common class of collinear altermagnets, enabling electrical and optical control of spin-polarized currents through mixed-parity textures. The explicit mapping of light-induced order to loop-current order and the prediction of a dissipationless anomalous spin Hall effect in the PT case provide falsifiable signatures that could guide experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the induced (P,T)=(-,-) order can be superimposed on a collinear altermagnet while preserving its original magnetic order and the validity of the Floquet/symmetry analysis is load-bearing. The group-theory classification and microscopic Floquet derivation treat the altermagnetic order parameter as fixed when adding the new term, but no self-consistent minimization of the total energy or perturbative stability analysis is provided to confirm that back-reaction does not induce canting, alter the altermagnetic wavevector, or generate additional spin-orbit terms that would change the predicted mixed-parity spin texture.
  2. In the microscopic Floquet theory section, the effective Hamiltonian after two-color driving is derived under the assumption that the driving remains perturbative and does not destabilize the underlying collinear order. An explicit check (e.g., via the Floquet-Magnus expansion or self-consistent mean-field treatment) that the induced static order remains compatible with the original altermagnetic symmetry without generating higher-order corrections would strengthen the controllability claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that group-theory and microscopic Floquet theory are presented, but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit section roadmap (e.g., §II for group theory, §III for Floquet) to guide readers through the two complementary approaches.
  2. Notation for the (P,T) classifications is clear in the abstract but could be reinforced with a summary table early in the text listing the symmetry properties and resulting spin-splitting types for each case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the stability assumptions in our symmetry and Floquet analyses. We address the two major comments point by point below, clarifying the scope of our perturbative and symmetry-based approach while making partial revisions to strengthen the discussion of validity regimes.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the induced (P,T)=(-,-) order can be superimposed on a collinear altermagnet while preserving its original magnetic order and the validity of the Floquet/symmetry analysis is load-bearing. The group-theory classification and microscopic Floquet derivation treat the altermagnetic order parameter as fixed when adding the new term, but no self-consistent minimization of the total energy or perturbative stability analysis is provided to confirm that back-reaction does not induce canting, alter the altermagnetic wavevector, or generate additional spin-orbit terms that would change the predicted mixed-parity spin texture.

    Authors: The group-theoretical classification is based solely on the combined symmetry group and remains valid whenever the altermagnetic order and the induced (P,T)=(-,-) order coexist while preserving the overall symmetries; it does not depend on microscopic energetics or self-consistency. The Floquet derivation is performed explicitly in the perturbative regime, where the driving amplitude is small compared to the altermagnetic exchange scale, so that the leading-order effective Hamiltonian generates the mixed-parity texture without altering the underlying collinear order at this order. We acknowledge that a full self-consistent energy minimization would provide further reassurance and have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the perturbative validity, estimating that back-reaction effects (canting or wavevector shifts) enter only at higher orders in the driving strength. This addresses the concern without requiring a complete microscopic model. revision: partial

  2. Referee: In the microscopic Floquet theory section, the effective Hamiltonian after two-color driving is derived under the assumption that the driving remains perturbative and does not destabilize the underlying collinear order. An explicit check (e.g., via the Floquet-Magnus expansion or self-consistent mean-field treatment) that the induced static order remains compatible with the original altermagnetic symmetry without generating higher-order corrections would strengthen the controllability claim.

    Authors: Our derivation uses the Floquet-Magnus expansion truncated at the lowest order that produces the static (P,T)=(-,-) term. This leading term is symmetry-compatible with the altermagnet by construction, as it arises from the phase-locked driving that respects the required transformation properties. Higher-order terms in the expansion are parametrically smaller for weak driving and do not generate symmetry-breaking corrections at the order considered. We have revised the manuscript to include an explicit statement clarifying this perturbative compatibility and a qualitative argument that no destabilizing canting or additional spin-orbit terms appear in the leading effective Hamiltonian. A quantitative self-consistent mean-field analysis would necessitate a specific lattice Hamiltonian and lies beyond the present symmetry-focused scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation rests on standard group theory and Floquet methods

full rationale

The paper's framework applies established group-theory classification of (P,T) symmetries and microscopic Floquet theory to derive induced odd-parity spin splittings in collinear altermagnets. These tools are external to the paper and do not reduce any prediction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The claimed symmetry equivalence between phase-locked two-color driving and P-odd loop-current order is presented as a direct consequence of the symmetry analysis rather than a tautological renaming or ansatz imported from prior author work. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit a load-bearing reduction to the paper's own inputs; the central results remain independent of any self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only abstract available, so ledger is inferred from mentioned concepts; full paper likely contains additional domain assumptions in the microscopic theory.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard magnetic point-group symmetry classification under P and T operations.
    Used to identify allowed (P,T) states and spin-splitting textures.
  • domain assumption Validity of Floquet theory for describing periodic light-driven systems in solids.
    Invoked for the two-color light mechanism to induce static order.
invented entities (1)
  • P-odd loop-current order no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide a static, translationally invariant order equivalent to the light-induced (P,T)=(-,-) state.
    Introduced as a symmetry-equivalent alternative mechanism for coupling to altermagnets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1514 out tokens · 62274 ms · 2026-05-08T17:34:45.626167+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear anti- ferromagnetic ordering,

    Satoru Hayami, Yuki Yanagi, and Hiroaki Kusunose, “Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear anti- ferromagnetic ordering,” journal of the physical society of japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromag- nets,

    Lin-Ding Yuan, Zhi Wang, Jun-Wei Luo, Emmanuel I Rashba, and Alex Zunger, “Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromag- nets,” Physical Review B102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Pre- diction of unconventional magnetism in doped fesb2,

    Igor I Mazin, Klaus Koepernik, Michelle D Johannes, Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and LiborˇSmejkal, “Pre- diction of unconventional magnetism in doped fesb2,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry,” Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,” Phys- ical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,

    J Krempask` y, L ˇSmejkal, SW D’souza, M Hajlaoui, G Springholz, K Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F Alarab, PC Constantinou, V Strocov, D Usanov, et al., “Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,” Nature626, 517–522 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism,

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V` yborn` y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn` y, “Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism,” Physical Review Letters126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Electrical 180 switching of n´ eel vec- tor in spin-splitting antiferromagnet,

    Lei Han, Xizhi Fu, Rui Peng, Xingkai Cheng, Jiankun Dai, Liangyang Liu, Yidian Li, Yichi Zhang, Wenxuan Zhu, Hua Bai, et al., “Electrical 180 switching of n´ eel vec- tor in spin-splitting antiferromagnet,” Science Advances 10, eadn0479 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets,

    Qirui Cui, Bowen Zeng, Ping Cui, Tao Yu, and Hongxin Yang, “Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets,” Physical Review B108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Crystal time-reversal symme- try breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear an- tiferromagnets,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Tom´ aˇ s Jung- wirth, and Jairo Sinova, “Crystal time-reversal symme- try breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear an- tiferromagnets,” Science advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets,

    Merc` e Roig, Yue Yu, Rune C. Ekman, Andreas Kreisel, Brian M. Andersen, and Daniel F. Agter- berg, “Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets,” Physical Review Letters135(2025), 10.1103/839n-rckn

    work page doi:10.1103/839n-rckn 2025

  12. [12]

    Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders,

    Yi Jiang, Ziyin Song, Tiannian Zhu, Zhong Fang, Hong- ming Weng, Zheng-Xin Liu, Jian Yang, and Chen Fang, “Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders,” Physical Review X14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Spin space groups: Full classification and applications,

    Zhenyu Xiao, Jianzhou Zhao, Yanqi Li, Ryuichi Shindou, and Zhi-Da Song, “Spin space groups: Full classification and applications,” Physical Review X14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups,

    Xiaobing Chen, Jun Ren, Yanzhou Zhu, Yutong Yu, Ao Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Jiayu Li, Yuntian Liu, Caiheng Li, and Qihang Liu, “Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups,” Physical Review X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Symmetry analy- sis with spin crystallographic groups: Disentangling ef- fects free of spin-orbit coupling in emergent electromag- netism,

    Hikaru Watanabe, Kohei Shinohara, Takuya Nomoto, Atsushi Togo, and Ryotaro Arita, “Symmetry analy- sis with spin crystallographic groups: Disentangling ef- fects free of spin-orbit coupling in emergent electromag- netism,” Physical Review B109, 094438 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Birk Hellenes, T

    Anna Birk Hellenes, Tom´ aˇ s Jungwirth, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Atasi Chakraborty, Jairo Sinova, and Libor ˇSmejkal, “P-wave magnets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01607 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Multiferroic collinear antiferromagnets with hidden al- termagnetic spin splitting,

    Jin Matsuda, Hikaru Watanabe, and Ryotaro Arita, “Multiferroic collinear antiferromagnets with hidden al- termagnetic spin splitting,” Physical Review Letters134 (2025), 10.1103/vgcs-bn8g

    work page doi:10.1103/vgcs-bn8g 2025

  18. [18]

    Minimal models and transport properties of unconventional p-wave magnets,

    Bjørnulf Brekke, Pavlo Sukhachov, Hans Gløckner Giil, Arne Brataas, and Jacob Linder, “Minimal models and transport properties of unconventional p-wave magnets,” Physical Review Letters133, 236703 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Odd-parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange,

    Yue Yu, Magnus B Lyngby, Tatsuya Shishidou, Merc` e Roig, Andreas Kreisel, Michael Weinert, Brian M An- dersen, and Daniel F Agterberg, “Odd-parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange,” Physical Review Letters135, 046701 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Luo, J.-X

    Xun-Jiang Luo, Jin-Xin Hu, and KT Law, “Spin sym- metry criteria for odd-parity magnets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05512 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    New perspec- tives for rashba spin–orbit coupling,

    Aurelien Manchon, Hyun Cheol Koo, Junsaku Nitta, Sergey M Frolov, and Rembert A Duine, “New perspec- tives for rashba spin–orbit coupling,” Nature materials 14, 871–882 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    Non- relativistic torque and edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets,

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Philipp Ritzinger, Karel V` yborn` y, JakubˇZelezn` y, and Aur´ elien Manchon, “Non- relativistic torque and edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets,” Nature Communications15, 7663 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Spin hall and edelstein effects in chiral non-collinear altermag- nets,

    Mengli Hu, Oleg Janson, Claudia Felser, Paul McClarty, Jeroen van den Brink, and Maia G. Vergniory, “Spin hall and edelstein effects in chiral non-collinear altermag- nets,” Nature Communications16, 8529 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Highly efficient non-relativistic edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,

    Atasi Chakraborty, Anna Birk Hellenes, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Tom´ as Jungwirth, LiborˇSmejkal, and Jairo Sinova, “Highly efficient non-relativistic edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets,” Nature Communica- tions16, 7270 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals,

    Xiuwen Zhang, Qihang Liu, Jun-Wei Luo, Arthur J Free- man, and Alex Zunger, “Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals,” Nature Physics10, 387–393 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    Nonlinear elec- tric transport in odd-parity magnetic multipole systems: Application to mn-based compounds,

    Hikaru Watanabe and Youichi Yanase, “Nonlinear elec- tric transport in odd-parity magnetic multipole systems: Application to mn-based compounds,” Physical Review Research2, 043081 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Magnetic parity violation and parity-time-reversal-symmetric magnets,

    Hikaru Watanabe and Youichi Yanase, “Magnetic parity violation and parity-time-reversal-symmetric magnets,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 373001 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Nonlinear spin hall effect in pt-symmetric collinear magnets,

    Satoru Hayami, Megumi Yatsushiro, and Hiroaki Kusunose, “Nonlinear spin hall effect in pt-symmetric collinear magnets,” Physical Review B106, 024405 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Lin, Odd-parity altermagnetism through sublattice currents: From Haldane-Hubbard model to general bipartite lattices, arXiv:2503.09602 (2025)

    Yu-Ping Lin and Marc Vila, “Odd-parity altermag- netism through sublattice currents: From haldane- hubbard model to general bipartite lattices,” (2026), arXiv:2503.09602 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Transition from antiferromagnets to altermagnets: Symmetry-breaking theory,

    P. Zhou, X. N. Peng, Y. Z. Hu, B. R. Pan, S. M. Liu, P. B. Lyu, and L. Z. Sun, “Transition from antiferromagnets to altermagnets: Symmetry-breaking theory,” Physical Review B112, 144419 (2025). 6

    2025

  31. [31]

    Floquet odd-parity collinear magnets,

    Tongshuai Zhu, Di Zhou, Huaiqiang Wang, and Jiawei Ruan, “Floquet odd-parity collinear magnets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02542 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Floquet Spin Splitting and Spin Generation in Antiferromagnets

    Bo Li, Ding-Fu Shao, and Alexey A Kovalev, “Floquet spin splitting and spin generation in antiferromagnets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22884 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Light-induced Odd-parity Magnetism in Conventional Collinear Antiferromagnets

    Shengpu Huang, Zheng Qin, Fangyang Zhan, Dong-Hui Xu, Da-Shuai Ma, and Rui Wang, “Light-induced odd- parity magnetism in conventional collinear antiferromag- nets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20705 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics,

    Ling Bai, Wanxiang Feng, Siyuan Liu, Libor ˇSmejkal, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Yugui Yao, “Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics,” Advanced Functional Materials34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    & Šmejkal, L

    Igor Mazin, Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and Libor ˇSmejkal, “Induced monolayer altermagnetism in mnp (s, se) 3 and fese,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02355 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Spin-orbit torques in co/pt(111) and mn/w(001) mag- netic bilayers from first principles,

    Frank Freimuth, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Spin-orbit torques in co/pt(111) and mn/w(001) mag- netic bilayers from first principles,” Phys. Rev. B90, 174423 (2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    Spin-orbit torques in locally and globally noncentrosymmetric crystals: Antiferromagnets and fer- romagnets,

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, H. Gao, Aur´ elien Manchon, Frank Freimuth, Yuriy Mokrousov, J. Zemen, J. Maˇ sek, Jairo Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Spin-orbit torques in locally and globally noncentrosymmetric crystals: Antiferromagnets and fer- romagnets,” Phys. Rev. B95, 014403 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Systematic analysis method for nonlinear response tensors,

    Rikuto Oiwa and Hiroaki Kusunose, “Systematic analysis method for nonlinear response tensors,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 014701 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Generation of optical harmonics,

    eg PA Franken, Alan E Hill, CW el Peters, and Gabriel Weinreich, “Generation of optical harmonics,” Physical review letters7, 118 (1961)

    1961

  40. [40]

    Surface properties probed by second- harmonic and sum-frequency generation,

    YR Shen, “Surface properties probed by second- harmonic and sum-frequency generation,” Nature337, 519–525 (1989)

    1989

  41. [41]

    Nonlinear optics,

    Robert W Boyd, Alexander L Gaeta, and Enno Giese, “Nonlinear optics,” in Springer handbook of atomic, molecular, and optical physics (Springer, 2008) pp. 1097–1110

    2008

  42. [42]

    Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates,

    CM Varma, “Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 155113 (2006)

    2006

  43. [43]

    Loop currents in av 3 sb 5 kagome metals: Multipolar and toroidal magnetic or- ders,

    Morten H Christensen, Turan Birol, Brian M Andersen, and Rafael M Fernandes, “Loop currents in av 3 sb 5 kagome metals: Multipolar and toroidal magnetic or- ders,” Physical Review B106, 144504 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Parity and time-reversal invari- ant ising spin ordering,

    Yue Yu, Jin Matsuda, Hikaru Watanabe, Ryotaro Arita, and Daniel F Agterberg, “Parity and time-reversal invari- ant ising spin ordering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12330 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    Mohsen Yarmohammadi, Pei-Hao Fu, and James K Freericks, “Efficient two-color floquet control of the rkky interaction in altermagnets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20862 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Landau Theory of Altermagnetism,

    Paul A. McClarty and Jeffrey G. Rau, “Landau Theory of Altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets,

    Daniil S Antonenko, Rafael M Fernandes, and J¨ orn WF Venderbos, “Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets,” Physical review letters134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Minimal models for altermag- netism,

    Merc` e Roig, Andreas Kreisel, Yue Yu, Brian M Andersen, and Daniel F Agterberg, “Minimal models for altermag- netism,” Physical Review B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets,

    Makoto Naka, Satoru Hayami, Hiroaki Kusunose, Yuki Yanagi, Yukitoshi Motome, and Hitoshi Seo, “Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets,” Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Per- ovskite as a spin current generator,

    Makoto Naka, Yukitoshi Motome, and Hitoshi Seo, “Per- ovskite as a spin current generator,” Physical Review B 103, 125114 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semicon- ducting mno 2: A density functional calculation,

    Yusuke Noda, Kaoru Ohno, and Shinichiro Nakamura, “Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semicon- ducting mno 2: A density functional calculation,” Physi- cal Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 13294–13303 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum- dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling,

    Lin-Ding Yuan, Zhi Wang, Jun-Wei Luo, and Alex Zunger, “Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum- dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling,” Physical Review Materials5, 014409 (2021). 7 METHOD The eigenvalue equation Eq. 2 can be written in matrix form asH| ⃗ϕ⟩=ε| ⃗ϕ⟩, with H=   ... ...

    2021

  53. [53]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 +J 0( A2√

  54. [54]

    cos ky√ 3 + 4J1( A1 2 )J2( A2 2 √

  55. [55]

    sin kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3) t(1) x =t 1(−2J0( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  56. [56]

    cos kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 −J 1( A2√

  57. [57]

    sin ky√ 3 + 2J1( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  58. [58]

    sin kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3) t(2) x =t 1(−2J1( A1 2 )J0( A2 2 √

  59. [59]

    sin kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 −2J 0( A1 2 )J2( A2 2 √

  60. [60]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 −J 2( A2√

  61. [61]

    cos ky√ 3) t(3) x =t 1(2J1( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  62. [62]

    sin kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 + 2J0( A1 2 )J3( A2 2 √

  63. [63]

    cos kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 +J 3( A2√

  64. [64]

    sin ky√ 3 + 2J2( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  65. [65]

    cos kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3) t(4) x =t 1(−2J2( A1 2 )J0( A2 2 √

  66. [66]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 + 2J1( A1 2 )J2( A2 2 √

  67. [67]

    sin kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3) (11) t(0) y =t 1(−2J0( A1 2 )J0( A2 2 √

  68. [68]

    cos kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 +J 0( A2√

  69. [69]

    sin ky√ 3 −4J 1( A1 2 )J2( A2 2 √

  70. [70]

    sin kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3) t(1) y =t 1(−2J0( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  71. [71]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 +J 1( A2√

  72. [72]

    cos ky√ 3 + 2J1( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  73. [73]

    sin kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3) t(2) y =t 1(2J1( A1 2 )J0( A2 2 √

  74. [74]

    sin kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 + 2J0( A1 2 )J2( A2 2 √

  75. [75]

    cos kx 2 sin ky 2 √ 3 −J 2( A2√

  76. [76]

    sin ky√ 3) t(3) y =t 1(2J1( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  77. [77]

    sin kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 + 2J0( A1 2 )J3( A2 2 √

  78. [78]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3 −J 3( A2√

  79. [79]

    cos ky√ 3 + 2J2( A1 2 )J1( A2 2 √

  80. [80]

    cos kx 2 cos ky 2 √ 3) t(4) y =t 1(2J2( A1 2 )J0( A2 2 √

Showing first 80 references.