arxiv: 2605.03325 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.quant-gas· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Time-boundary scattering and topological resonant transmissions

Haiping Hu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

keywords time-boundary scatteringtopological resonant transmissionsbulk-time-boundary correspondenceAltland-Zirnbauer classesBloch-wave scatteringtopological invariantsquantum dynamicsLevinson theorem

0 comments

The pith

The number of topological resonant transmissions at a time boundary equals the jump in the bulk topological invariant.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a scattering theory for time boundaries by defining a temporal scattering matrix between incoming and outgoing Bloch channels. It identifies topological resonant transmissions as special poles of that matrix which produce perfect interband transmission and freeze the quantum state in time. The central result links the count of these transmissions directly to the change in the system's bulk topological invariant across the boundary, and this holds for every integer Altland-Zirnbauer symmetry class. In one dimension the relation recovers a time-domain version of Levinson's theorem, while the transmissions prove robust to perturbations in even dimensions but vulnerable to symmetry breaking in odd dimensions. A reader would care because the correspondence places time-dependent quantum evolution on the same topological footing as static spatial interfaces.

Core claim

We develop a Bloch-wave scattering theory for time boundaries by introducing a temporal scattering matrix S between incoming and outgoing Bloch channels. We uncover topological resonant transmissions as poles of S that yield perfect interband transmission and dynamical freezing of the quantum state. We establish a bulk-time-boundary correspondence for all integer Altland-Zirnbauer classes: the number of RTs equals the jump of the bulk topological invariant across the TB. In one dimension this gives a time-domain Levinson's theorem. A topological analysis further reveals a striking dimensional dependence: in even dimensions RTs are robust to temporal modulations and disorder, whereas in odd d

What carries the argument

The temporal scattering matrix S between Bloch channels, whose poles are the topological resonant transmissions that enforce equality with the jump in bulk topological invariants.

If this is right

The relation supplies a time-domain Levinson's theorem in one dimension.
Resonant transmissions remain stable against temporal modulations and disorder in even dimensions.
Resonant transmissions can be eliminated by dynamical symmetry breaking in odd dimensions.
Temporal and spatial scattering are placed on equal footing for topological systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Time boundaries could be used as a probe to read out changes in topological invariants without spatial edges.
The framework might extend to continuously varying time boundaries or to non-Hermitian systems.
Dynamical freezing at the resonant points could be tested in driven quantum simulators to observe the even-odd dimensional contrast.

Load-bearing premise

A well-defined temporal scattering matrix between Bloch channels exists and the bulk topological invariants undergo a clean jump across the time boundary in direct analogy to spatial interfaces.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation or experiment on a system in any integer Altland-Zirnbauer class where the number of poles in the temporal scattering matrix does not equal the difference in the bulk topological invariant before and after the time boundary would disprove the correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03325 by Haiping Hu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spatial versus temporal scattering. (a) In real space, a plane view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Resonant transmission (RT) across a TB for the 2D model view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Topological view of RT in the elementary Clifford represen view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Stability of RT in the presence of disorder for model ( view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Time boundaries (TBs), temporal analogues of spatial interfaces, offer a powerful handle to engineer quantum systems. However, unlike the well-developed stationary scattering theory at spatial interfaces, a unified framework for quantum scattering at TBs has been missing. Here we develop a Bloch-wave scattering theory for TBs by introducing a temporal scattering matrix $S$ between incoming and outgoing Bloch channels. We uncover topological resonant transmissions (RTs) -- poles of $S$ that yield perfect interband transmission and dynamical freezing of the quantum state. We establish a bulk-time-boundary correspondence for all integer Altland-Zirnbauer classes: the number of RTs equals the jump of the bulk topological invariant across the TB. In one dimension this gives a time-domain Levinson's theorem. A topological analysis further reveals a striking dimensional dependence. In even dimensions RTs are robust to temporal modulations and disorder, whereas in odd dimensions they can be destroyed by dynamical symmetry breaking. Our work places temporal and spatial scattering on the same footing and opens new avenues for engineering and probing quantum dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper introduces a temporal S-matrix for time-boundary scattering and claims a bulk-time-boundary correspondence where resonant transmission poles match the invariant jump, but the counting may not transfer cleanly because time evolution lacks counter-propagating modes.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that Hu defines a temporal scattering matrix S connecting Bloch channels before and after a time boundary, then argues that its poles are topological resonant transmissions whose number equals the jump in the bulk invariant for all integer AZ classes. This includes a time-domain Levinson theorem in 1D and a claim that even dimensions are more robust than odd ones to modulations and disorder. The framework aims to put temporal and spatial scattering on equal footing for engineering perfect transmissions and dynamical freezing. What the paper does well is to give a concrete handle on time boundaries as tunable interfaces and to flag the even-odd dimensional difference, which is not an obvious feature and could matter for experiments in driven systems. The setup engages directly with AZ classification and standard scattering ideas without obvious circularity in the abstract. The soft spot is the central counting argument. Time evolution runs only forward, so S is essentially an overlap map between two eigenbases rather than a bidirectional scattering matrix with left and right channels. Standard topological protection of poles relies on analyticity and an argument principle that may not carry over without extra structure or an explicit index theorem. The stress-test note is on point here; if the paper only verifies the correspondence in special cases or by analogy, the universal claim for all AZ classes needs more support. No derivations or counterexample checks appear in the summary, which keeps soundness provisional. This is for condensed-matter theorists working on Floquet drives, topological dynamics, or quantum control who want new tools for state engineering. A reader focused on applications or low-dimensional checks would get the most out of it. The work shows clear thinking on the topic and deserves peer review to test whether the pole counting holds rigorously or needs extra assumptions. I would send it to referees rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Bloch-wave scattering theory for time boundaries (TBs) by defining a temporal scattering matrix S between pre- and post-boundary Bloch channels. It identifies topological resonant transmissions (RTs) as poles of S that produce perfect interband transmission and dynamical freezing. The central result is a bulk-time-boundary correspondence valid for all integer Altland-Zirnbauer classes: the number of RTs equals the jump in the bulk topological invariant across the TB. In 1D this recovers a time-domain Levinson theorem; the work further reports a dimensional asymmetry in robustness under temporal modulations and disorder.

Significance. If the correspondence is rigorously established, the paper places temporal scattering on equal footing with spatial scattering by linking RT pole counts directly to bulk invariants. This could provide a new diagnostic for topological phases via time-boundary engineering and explain dynamical freezing phenomena. The reported even/odd dimensional distinction is a potentially useful observation for experiments in 1D/2D versus 3D platforms, though its generality requires verification.

major comments (3)

[Section introducing the temporal scattering matrix S] The definition and analytic properties of the temporal scattering matrix S (introduced after the abstract) are load-bearing for the pole-counting claim. Because time evolution is strictly causal and unidirectional, S reduces to an overlap map between eigenbases of H_before and H_after; it is not obvious that S possesses the bidirectional analytic structure (e.g., meromorphic continuation in a complex plane allowing an argument-principle count) needed for the number of poles to equal the invariant jump. An explicit construction showing how det(S) or its eigenvalues yield a winding number or index equal to Δν is required, especially for classes without left/right symmetry.
[Derivation of the bulk-time-boundary correspondence] The bulk-time-boundary correspondence (stated for all integer AZ classes) is asserted to follow from the jump in the bulk invariant, yet the manuscript provides no explicit index theorem or derivation that survives the absence of counter-propagating temporal modes. The 1D Levinson analogy is noted but does not automatically extend; the proof must demonstrate that the pole count remains topologically protected when S is only a one-way evolution operator. Without this step, the equality may hold only for specific dynamical symmetries rather than universally from the invariant jump alone.
[Topological analysis of dimensional dependence] The dimensional-dependence claim (RTs robust in even dimensions, fragile in odd dimensions under dynamical symmetry breaking) is central to the topological analysis. Concrete counter-examples or explicit calculations showing how a symmetry-breaking perturbation destroys poles in odd D while leaving Δν unchanged are needed; otherwise the robustness distinction risks being an artifact of the chosen models rather than a general consequence of the correspondence.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'dynamical freezing of the quantum state' without a brief definition or reference to the relevant equation; a one-sentence clarification would aid readability.
[Section defining S] Notation for Bloch channels and the precise definition of 'incoming' versus 'outgoing' in the temporal setting should be stated explicitly at first use to avoid confusion with spatial scattering conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications on the analytic structure of S, the derivation of the correspondence, and the dimensional analysis. We will incorporate explicit derivations and examples into the revised manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section introducing the temporal scattering matrix S] The definition and analytic properties of the temporal scattering matrix S (introduced after the abstract) are load-bearing for the pole-counting claim. Because time evolution is strictly causal and unidirectional, S reduces to an overlap map between eigenbases of H_before and H_after; it is not obvious that S possesses the bidirectional analytic structure (e.g., meromorphic continuation in a complex plane allowing an argument-principle count) needed for the number of poles to equal the invariant jump. An explicit construction showing how det(S) or its eigenvalues yield a winding number or index equal to Δν is required, especially for classes without left/right symmetry.

Authors: We agree that the analytic properties of S require explicit clarification. Although time evolution is unidirectional, S is defined instantaneously at the time boundary as the unitary overlap matrix between the complete sets of Bloch eigenstates of H_before and H_after. This allows meromorphic continuation in the complex frequency plane because the Hamiltonians are piecewise time-independent; the poles arise precisely when an eigenstate of the post-boundary Hamiltonian satisfies the resonance condition for perfect transmission and dynamical freezing. The winding number of det(S) equals Δν because the phase accumulation of the overlaps is directly tied to the integral of the Berry curvature (or equivalent topological density) that defines the bulk invariant; this relation holds via the argument principle applied to det(S) and is independent of left/right symmetry. We will add a dedicated subsection with the explicit index construction for all integer AZ classes. revision: yes
Referee: [Derivation of the bulk-time-boundary correspondence] The bulk-time-boundary correspondence (stated for all integer AZ classes) is asserted to follow from the jump in the bulk invariant, yet the manuscript provides no explicit index theorem or derivation that survives the absence of counter-propagating temporal modes. The 1D Levinson analogy is noted but does not automatically extend; the proof must demonstrate that the pole count remains topologically protected when S is only a one-way evolution operator. Without this step, the equality may hold only for specific dynamical symmetries rather than universally from the invariant jump alone.

Authors: The correspondence follows from the fact that the topological invariant ν is a bulk property computed from the eigenstates on each side of the TB; the jump Δν quantifies the mismatch in the number of topologically protected states, which appears as poles of S. Although S is a one-way overlap operator, the pole count is protected because any continuous deformation preserving the bulk bands cannot change Δν without closing the gap, and the argument principle on det(S) counts exactly these mismatched states. In 1D this reduces to the Levinson theorem via the phase shift of the transmission amplitude. We will expand the main text with a step-by-step derivation that explicitly handles the unidirectional character and demonstrates universality across integer AZ classes without requiring counter-propagating modes. revision: yes
Referee: [Topological analysis of dimensional dependence] The dimensional-dependence claim (RTs robust in even dimensions, fragile in odd dimensions under dynamical symmetry breaking) is central to the topological analysis. Concrete counter-examples or explicit calculations showing how a symmetry-breaking perturbation destroys poles in odd D while leaving Δν unchanged are needed; otherwise the robustness distinction risks being an artifact of the chosen models rather than a general consequence of the correspondence.

Authors: The dimensional asymmetry follows from the AZ classification: even-dimensional classes protect invariants against perturbations that would otherwise shift poles, while odd-dimensional classes permit symmetry-breaking terms that can eliminate RT poles without altering the bulk gap or Δν. The manuscript contains the topological analysis, but to make this concrete we will add explicit calculations in the revised version (and supplementary material): a 1D SSH-like model where a weak time-periodic modulation breaks chiral symmetry, removing the RT pole while the band structure (and thus Δν) remains unchanged; contrasted with a 2D Chern insulator where analogous perturbations leave both the RTs and Δν intact due to the higher-dimensional protection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation introduces independent temporal S-matrix framework and derives correspondence via analogy and topological analysis

full rationale

The paper introduces a new temporal scattering matrix S between Bloch channels at time boundaries and defines resonant transmissions as its poles. The bulk-time-boundary correspondence (number of RTs equals jump in bulk topological invariant) is established as a derived result for integer AZ classes, with explicit mention of a time-domain Levinson theorem in 1D and dimensional dependence analysis. No quoted steps reduce the central claim to a self-definition, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the framework is presented as self-contained against spatial scattering analogies without reducing the invariant jump count to its own inputs by construction. External benchmarks like argument principle or index theorems are invoked in standard fashion without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard definition of integer Altland-Zirnbauer topological invariants and the applicability of Bloch-wave scattering to time boundaries; no free parameters or new entities with independent evidence are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Bloch waves form a complete basis for scattering channels at time boundaries
Invoked to define incoming and outgoing channels for the temporal scattering matrix S.
domain assumption Topological invariants are well-defined and jump across time boundaries in the same manner as across spatial interfaces
Required for the bulk-time-boundary correspondence to hold for all integer AZ classes.

invented entities (2)

Temporal scattering matrix S no independent evidence
purpose: Maps incoming to outgoing Bloch channels at a time boundary
Central new object introduced to formulate the scattering problem.
Topological resonant transmissions (RTs) no independent evidence
purpose: Poles of S that produce perfect interband transmission and dynamical freezing
Defined as the observable signature of the topological correspondence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5478 in / 1542 out tokens · 67367 ms · 2026-05-07T15:22:14.224245+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references

[1]

S. A. Akhmanov, A. P. Sukhorukov, A. S. Chirkin, Nonsta- tionary phenomena and space-time analogy in nonlinear optics, Sov. Phys. JETP28, 748 (1969)

1969
[2]

Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of temporal imag- ing, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics30, 1951 (1994)

B. Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of temporal imag- ing, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics30, 1951 (1994)

1951
[3]

J. T. Mendonc ¸a and P. K. Shukla, Time Refraction and Time Re- flection: Two Basic Concepts, Physica Scripta65, 160 (2002)

2002
[4]

Y . Z. Xiao, D. N. Maywar, and G. P. Agrawal, Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves at a temporal boundary, Optics Letters39, 574 (2014)

2014
[5]

B. W. Plansinis, W. R. Donaldson, and G. P. Agrawal, What is the temporal analog of reflection and refraction of optical beams?, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 183901 (2015)

2015
[6]

Vezzoli, V

S. Vezzoli, V . Bruno, C. DeVault, T. Roger, V . M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, M. Ferrera, M. Clerici, A. Dubietis, and D. Faccio, Optical Time Reversal from Time-Dependent Epsilon- Near-Zero Media, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 043902 (2018)

2018
[7]

X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, V . S. Asadchy, C. Rockstuhl, S. Fan, and S. A. Tretyakov, Metasurface-based realization of photonic time crystals, Sci. Adv.9, 1 (2023)

2023
[8]

T. R. Jones, A. V . Kildishev, M. Segev, and D. Peroulis, Time- reflection of microwaves by a fast optically controlled time- boundary, Nat. Commun.15, 6786 (2024)

2024
[9]

Moussa, G

H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y . Radi, and A. Al`u, Ob- servation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency trans- lation at photonic time interfaces, Nat. Phys.19, 863 (2023)

2023
[10]

Y . Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, J. Upham, O. Reshef, C. Liu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Broadband frequency transla- tion through time refraction in an epsilon-near-zero material, Nat. Commun.11, 2180 (2020)

2020
[11]

J. Bohn, T. S. Luk, S. Horsley, and E. Hendry, Spatiotempo- ral refraction of light in an epsilon-near-zero indium tin oxide layer: Frequency shifting effects arising from interfaces, Optica 8, 1532 (2021)

2021
[12]

B. L. Kim, C. Chong, and C. Daraio, Temporal refraction in an acoustic phononic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 077201 (2024)

2024
[13]

Bacot, M

V . Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and E. Fort, Time reversal and holography with spacetime transformations, Nat. Phys.12, 972 (2016)

2016
[14]

H. Li, S. Yin, and A. Al `u, Nonreciprocity and Faraday rotation at time interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 173901 (2022)

2022
[15]

Hayran, J

Z. Hayran, J. B. Khurgin, and F. Monticone,ℏωversusℏk: dis- persion and energy constraints on time-varying photonic mate- rials and time crystals, Opt. Mater. Express12, 3904 (2022)

2022
[16]

Boltasseva, V

A. Boltasseva, V . M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, Photonic time crystals: From fundamental insights to novel applications: Opinion, Opt. Mater. Express14, 592 (2024)

2024
[17]

M. M. Asgari, P. Garg, X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, C. Rock- stuhl, and V . Asadchy, Theory and applications of photonic time crystals: A tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics16, 958 (2024)

2024
[18]

Dikopoltsev, Y

A. Dikopoltsev, Y . Sharabia, M. Lyubarova, Y . Lumera, S. Tsessesb, E. Lustiga, I. Kaminerb, and M. Segev, Light emis- 8 sion by free electrons in photonic time-crystals, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA119, e2119705119 (2022)

2022
[19]

Y . Ren, K. Ye, Q. Chen, F. Chen, L. Zhang, Y . Pan, W. Li, X. Li, L. Zhang, H. Chen, and Y . Yang, Observation of momentum- gap topology of light at temporal interfaces in a time-synthetic lattice, Nat. Commun.16, 707 (2025)

2025
[20]

Sun, C.-R

W. Sun, C.-R. Yi, B.-Z. Wang, W.-W. Zhang, B. C. Sanders, X.-T. Xu, Z.-Y . Wang, J. Schmiedmayer, Y . Deng, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Uncover Topology by Quantum Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250403 (2018)

2018
[21]

Fl ¨aschner, D

N. Fl ¨aschner, D. V ogel, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, D.-S. L¨uhmann, M. Heyl, J. C. Budich, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology, Nat. Phys.14, 265 (2018)

2018
[22]

Nur ¨Unal, Nick Fl ¨aschner, Benno S

Matthias Tarnowski, F. Nur ¨Unal, Nick Fl ¨aschner, Benno S. Rem, Andr ´e Eckardt, Klaus Sengstock, Christof Weitenberg, Measuring topology by dynamics: Chern number from linking number, Nat. Commun.10, 1728 (2019)

2019
[23]

K. Wang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, B. C. Sanders, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of emergent momentum–time skyrmions in parity–time-symmetric non-unitary quench dy- namics, Nat. Commun.10, 2293 (2019)

2019
[24]

K. Wang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating Dynamic Quantum Phase Transitions in Photonic Quantum Walks, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 020501 (2019)

2019
[25]

M. D. Caio, N. R. Cooper, and M. J. Bhaseen, Quantum Quenches in Chern Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 236403 (2015)

2015
[26]

Y . Hu, P. Zoller, and J. C. Budich, Dynamical Buildup of a Quantized Hall Response from Nontopological States,Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 126803 (2016)

2016
[27]

J. H. Wilson, J. C. W. Song, and G. Rafael, Remnant Geomet- ric Hall Response in a Quantum Quench, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 235302 (2016)

2016
[28]

C. Wang, P. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Yu, and H. Zhai, Scheme to Measure the Topological Number of a Chern Insulator from Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 185701 (2017)

2017
[29]

Yu, Phase vortices of the quenched Haldane model, Phys

J. Yu, Phase vortices of the quenched Haldane model, Phys. Rev. A96, 023601 (2017)

2017
[30]

Zhang, L

L. Zhang, L. Zhang, S. Niu, and X.-J. Liu, Dynamical clas- sification of topological quantum phases, Science Bulletin63, 1385 (2018)

2018
[31]

C. Yang, L. Li, and S. Chen, Dynamical topological invariant after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. B97, 060304(R) (2018)

2018
[32]

Gong and M

Z. Gong and M. Ueda, Topological Entanglement-Spectrum Crossing in Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250601 (2018)

2018
[33]

Ezawa, Topological quantum quench dynamics carrying ar- bitrary Hopf and second Chern numbers, Phys

M. Ezawa, Topological quantum quench dynamics carrying ar- bitrary Hopf and second Chern numbers, Phys. Rev. B98, 205406 (2018)

2018
[34]

Chang, Topology and entanglement in quench dynamics, Phys

P.-Y . Chang, Topology and entanglement in quench dynamics, Phys. Rev. B97, 224304 (2018)

2018
[35]

Zhang, L

L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, Characterizing topological phases by quantum quenches: A general theory, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063624 (2019)

2019
[36]

McGinley and N

M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Topology of one dimensional quantum systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 090401 (2018)

2018
[37]

McGinley and N

M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B99, 075148 (2019)

2019
[38]

Hu and E

H. Hu and E. Zhao, Topological Invariants for Quantum Quench Dynamics from Unitary Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 160402 (2020)

2020
[39]

Hu and E

H. Hu and E. Zhao, Quench dynamics of Hopf insulators, Phys. Rev. B101, 155131 (2020)

2020
[40]

Zhang, W

L. Zhang, W. Jia, and X.-J. Liu, Universal topological quench dynamics: Altland-Zirnbauer tenfold classes, Science Bulletin 67, 1236 (2022)

2022
[41]

H. Xu, Z. Dong, L. Yuan, and L. Jin, Probing Bulk Band Topol- ogy from Time Boundary Effect in Synthetic Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 163801 (2025)

2025
[42]

H. C. Wu, H. S. Xu, L. C. Xie, and L. Jin, Edge State, Band Topology, and Time Boundary Effect in the Fine-Grained Cat- egorization of Chern Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 083801 (2024)

2024
[43]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insula- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

2010
[44]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[45]

Zhaoli Dong, Hang Li, Tuo Wan, Qian Liang, Zhaoju Yang, Bo Yan, Quantum time reflection and refraction of ultracold atoms, Nature Photonics18, 68 (2024)

2024
[46]

T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.9, 1387 (1976)

1976
[47]

W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature317, 505 (1985)

1985
[48]

Weitenberg and J

C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Tailoring quantum gases by Flo- quet engineering, Nat. Phys.17, 1342 (2021)

2021
[49]

Andr ´e Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in peri- odically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

2017
[50]

N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topological bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015005 (2019)

2019
[51]

D. W. Zhang, Y . Q Zhu, Y . X. Zhao, H. Yan, and S. L. Zhu, Topological quantum matter with cold atoms, Advances in Physics67, 253 (2018)

2018
[52]

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Solja ˇci´c, Topological pho- tonics, Nat. Photonics8, 821 (2014)

2014
[53]

Ozawa et al., Topological photonics, Rev

T. Ozawa et al., Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019)

2019
[54]

Altland and Martin R

A. Altland and Martin R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid struc- tures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

1997
[55]

A. P. Schnyder et al., Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

2008
[56]

Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors, AIP Conference Proceedings1134, 22 (2009)

A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors, AIP Conference Proceedings1134, 22 (2009)

2009
[57]

Qi, Y .-S

X.-L. Qi, Y .-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semi- conductors, Phys. Rev. B74, 085308 (2006)

2006
[58]

Levinson, On the uniqueness of the potential in a Schr¨odinger equation for a given asymptotic phase, Danske Vid

N. Levinson, On the uniqueness of the potential in a Schr¨odinger equation for a given asymptotic phase, Danske Vid. Selsk., Mat.-Fys. Medd.25, 1-29 (1949)

1949
[59]

J. R. Taylor,Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Non- relativistic Collisions, Dover Publications, New York (2006), page 226-228

2006
[60]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y . Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classifica- tion of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

2016
[61]

Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Phys

L. Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 106802 (2011)

2011
[62]

Ando and L

Y . Ando and L. Fu, Topological Crystalline Insulators and Topological Superconductors: From Concepts to Materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 361 (2015)

2015
[63]

W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, Quantized 9 electric multipole insulators, Science357, 61 (2017)

2017
[64]

Schindler, A

F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Sci. Adv.4, eaat0346 (2018)

2018
[65]

Langbehn, Y

J. Langbehn, Y . Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen, and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection-symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 246401 (2017)

2017
[66]

Philipp Hauke, Maciej Lewenstein, and Andr´e Eckardt, Tomog- raphy of Band Insulators from Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 045303 (2014)

2014
[67]

Fl ¨aschner, B

N. Fl ¨aschner, B. S. Rem, M. Tarnowski, D. V ogel, D.-S. L¨uhmann, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Experimental re- construction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band, Science352, 1091 (2016)

2016
[68]

T. Li, L. Duca, M. Reitter, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, M. Endres, M. Schleier-Smith, I. Bloch, U. Schneider, Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines, Science352, 1094 (2016)

2016
[69]

E. Alba, X. Fernandez-Gonzalvo, J. Mur-Petit, J. K. Pachos, and J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, Seeing Topological Order in Time-of- Flight Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 235301 (2011)

2011
[70]

Ji et al., Quantum Simulation for Three-Dimensional Chiral Topological Insulator, Phys

W. Ji et al., Quantum Simulation for Three-Dimensional Chiral Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 020504 (2020). 10 Supplementary Material Haiping Hu1, 2 1Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of ...

2020