pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03539 · v2 · pith:AXNYNBY3new · submitted 2026-05-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph

Gauge-Field-Mediated Symmetry Breaking of Matters Under Electromagnetic Fields and Its Impact on Spin Dynamics

Uiseok Jeong , Esmaeil Taghizadeh Sisakht , Angel Rubio , Carsten A. Ullrich , Kyoung-Whan Kim , Noejung Park This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords gauge fieldspin-orbit couplingsymmetry breakingspin dynamicstime-dependent density functional theoryelectromagnetic fieldsnonequilibrium dynamicscondensed matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

The gauge-field term in spin-orbit coupling drives symmetry breaking and enables dynamical spin states under electromagnetic fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that symmetry breaking and the resulting spin dynamics in condensed-matter systems under external electromagnetic fields are governed by the gauge-field contribution to spin-orbit coupling. Without this term the spins remain constrained by the material symmetry. Real-time time-dependent density functional theory simulations on systems possessing mirror, glide, and screw-rotational symmetry show that the gauge-field term perturbs the canonical spin-orbit term, allowing a dynamical spin state to develop gradually during time evolution. A reader would care because the result indicates that standard treatments of nonequilibrium spin-orbit effects may be incomplete even for weak fields, changing how spin behavior is predicted in driven materials.

Core claim

When a condensed-matter system is subjected to external electromagnetic fields, the gauge-invariant formulation of physical operators must explicitly incorporate the gauge-field contribution. The authors demonstrate that the symmetry breaking and consequent spin dynamics are governed by the gauge-field term, without which the spins remain symmetry-constrained. Real-time time-dependent density functional theory calculations reveal that when the gauge-field term in the time-dependent Hamiltonian perturbs the symmetry of the canonical term, a dynamical spin state gradually develops during the time evolution beyond the symmetry-frozen states.

What carries the argument

The gauge-field term in the gauge-invariant formulation of the spin-orbit coupling operator, which perturbs symmetry in the time-dependent Hamiltonian under external electromagnetic fields.

If this is right

  • The full gauge-invariant spin-orbit coupling must be retained for quantitative accuracy in nonequilibrium spin-orbit dynamics.
  • Symmetry constraints on spin states are lifted once the gauge-field term perturbs the canonical spin-orbit term.
  • Dynamical spin evolution appears in systems with mirror, glide, or screw-rotational symmetry when electromagnetic fields are applied.
  • Even weak external fields can produce observable spin dynamics through this gauge-mediated mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spintronic devices might use tailored electromagnetic pulses to control spin states via this previously overlooked gauge contribution.
  • The same gauge-field symmetry breaking could be tested in orbital or charge dynamics under external fields in related materials.
  • Analytical models derived from the gauge term might complement the numerical TDDFT results to predict spin precession rates.

Load-bearing premise

Real-time time-dependent density functional theory calculations can isolate the gauge-field term as the dominant symmetry-perturbing mechanism without significant interference from numerical approximations or other dynamical effects.

What would settle it

If spin dynamics remain absent or unchanged in simulations when the gauge-field term is deliberately omitted from the time-dependent Hamiltonian, or if experiments on symmetry-protected systems show no evolving spin states under applied fields, the claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03539 by Angel Rubio, Carsten A. Ullrich, Esmaeil Taghizadeh Sisakht, Kyoung-Whan Kim, Noejung Park, Uiseok Jeong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Mirror-reflection properties of the canonical and view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Symmetry breaking induced by external fields and view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Screw rotational symmetry of a trigonal chiral wire view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Influence of view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spin-resolved three-dimensional band structure of the two-dimensional Rashba square-lattice model defined in Eq. (4) view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Crystal structure of ZrSiS viewed along the (left) top view and (right) side view, illustrating the nonsymmorphic glide view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Electronic band structures of Bi view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real-time spin dynamics of Bi view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Real-time spin dynamics of ZrSiS obtained from rt-TDDFT calculations, showing all three Cartesian components of view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When a condensed-matter system is subjected to external electromagnetic fields, the gauge-invariant formulation of physical operators must explicitly incorporate the gauge-field contribution. However, in the context of spin-orbit coupling (SOC), this gauge-field term is often regarded as negligible or merely additive compared to the canonical SOC, which is typically localized near atomic cores. Here, we demonstrate that the symmetry breaking and consequent spin dynamics are governed by the gauge-field term, without which the spins remain symmetry-constrained. We perform real-time time-dependent density functional theory calculations to investigate spin-orbit dynamics, focusing on representative cases with mirror, glide, and screw-rotational symmetry. We demonstrate that when the gauge-field term in the time-dependent Hamiltonian perturbs the symmetry of the canonical term, a dynamical spin state gradually develops during the time evolution, beyond the symmetry-frozen states. We suggest that, for nonequilibrium spin-orbit dynamics, the gauge-invariant formulation of SOC is not only formally required but also quantitatively essential, even for a weak external field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the gauge-field term in the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) Hamiltonian is the dominant driver of symmetry breaking and ensuing spin dynamics in condensed-matter systems under external electromagnetic fields. Using real-time time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) on representative cases with mirror, glide, and screw-rotational symmetry, it asserts that the canonical SOC term alone keeps spins symmetry-constrained, while inclusion of the gauge-field correction allows a dynamical spin state to develop during time evolution. The abstract concludes that the gauge-invariant formulation is quantitatively essential even for weak fields.

Significance. If the central computational demonstration holds after proper controls, the work would establish that gauge-field contributions to SOC cannot be neglected in nonequilibrium spin dynamics, with potential consequences for modeling spin-orbit torques, ultrafast magnetism, and symmetry-protected spin textures in materials under light or electric fields.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that symmetry breaking and spin dynamics are governed by the gauge-field term (and absent without it) is supported only by the statement that 'TDDFT calculations show the effect,' with no quantitative results, spin-polarization time series, difference metrics between the two Hamiltonians, or error analysis provided. This leaves the attribution to the gauge term only moderately supported.
  2. [Computational results] Computational results section: no side-by-side control runs are reported that toggle solely the gauge-field correction in the time-dependent Hamiltonian while freezing all other numerical parameters (basis set, time step, propagation scheme). Real-time TDDFT is known to admit artificial symmetry breaking from finite-basis incompleteness or vector-potential handling; without such toggled comparisons and quantified convergence of spin polarization versus basis size or dt, the isolation of the gauge term as the symmetry-perturbing mechanism remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'representative cases' with mirror, glide, and screw symmetries but does not specify the material systems or crystal structures used; adding this information would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and provide additional supporting details where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that symmetry breaking and spin dynamics are governed by the gauge-field term (and absent without it) is supported only by the statement that 'TDDFT calculations show the effect,' with no quantitative results, spin-polarization time series, difference metrics between the two Hamiltonians, or error analysis provided. This leaves the attribution to the gauge term only moderately supported.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concise quantitative summary to better support the central claim. The main text already contains the relevant time series and comparisons, but we will revise the abstract to include a brief statement highlighting the key quantitative distinction: the development of finite spin polarization (on the scale of 0.01–0.1 μ_B per relevant atom) over the simulation time when the gauge-field term is included, versus strictly zero polarization when it is omitted. We will also add a reference to the primary figures showing these time evolutions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Computational results] Computational results section: no side-by-side control runs are reported that toggle solely the gauge-field correction in the time-dependent Hamiltonian while freezing all other numerical parameters (basis set, time step, propagation scheme). Real-time TDDFT is known to admit artificial symmetry breaking from finite-basis incompleteness or vector-potential handling; without such toggled comparisons and quantified convergence of spin polarization versus basis size or dt, the isolation of the gauge term as the symmetry-perturbing mechanism remains unverified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important methodological point. Our calculations were performed precisely by toggling only the gauge-field correction while holding the basis set, time step, propagation algorithm, and all other numerical parameters fixed; the resulting contrast in spin dynamics is shown in the time-evolution plots of the results section. To make the control protocol fully explicit and to rule out numerical artifacts, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the computational results section describing these toggled runs together with convergence data for spin polarization as a function of basis size and time step, including quantitative difference metrics between the two Hamiltonians. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in computational demonstration of gauge-field symmetry breaking

full rationale

The paper advances its central claim through real-time TDDFT simulations that compare spin dynamics with and without the gauge-field term in the time-dependent Hamiltonian. No analytical derivation chain is presented that reduces a result to its own inputs by construction, nor are any predictions obtained by fitting parameters to subsets of the same data and then relabeling them. The evidence consists of numerical time evolution under representative symmetries (mirror, glide, screw), which constitutes an independent computational test rather than a self-referential definition or self-citation load-bearing argument. Any self-citations that may exist pertain to standard TDDFT methodology and do not substitute for the reported simulations. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default low-circularity assessment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of time-dependent density functional theory and electromagnetic gauge invariance without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Real-time TDDFT provides a reliable description of nonequilibrium spin-orbit dynamics under weak external fields
    The demonstration relies on TDDFT simulations to reveal the gauge-field effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1264 out tokens · 52192 ms · 2026-05-21T00:00:26.695268+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Nature571(7764), 240–244 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Siegrist, F., Gessner, J.A., Ossiander, M., Denker, C., Chang, Y.-P., Schr¨ oder, M.C., Guggenmos, A., Cui, Y., Walowski, J., Martens, U., Dewhurst, J.K., Kleineberg, U., M¨ unzenberg, M., Sharma, S., Schultze, M.: Light-wave dynamic control of magnetism. Nature571(7764), 240–244 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-019-1333-x

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Nature Communications15(1), 2043 (2024) https://doi

    Xu, Y., Zhang, F., Fert, A., Jaffres, H.-Y., Liu, Y., Xu, R., Jiang, Y., Cheng, H., Zhao, W.: Orbitronics: light-induced orbital currents in ni studied by terahertz emission experiments. Nature Communications15(1), 2043 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-024-46405-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46405-6 2043

  3. [3]

    npj Spintronics3(1), 3 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s44306-024-00068-7

    Salikhov, R., Lysne, M., Werner, P., Ilyakov, I., Sch¨ uler, M., Oliveira, T.V.A.G., Ponomaryov, A., Arshad, A., Prajapati, G.L., Deinert, J.-C., Makushko, P., Makarov, D., Cowan, T., Fassbender, J., Lindner, J., Lindner, A., Ortix, C., Kovalev, S.: Spin-orbit interaction driven terahertz nonlinear dynamics in transition metals. npj Spintronics3(1), 3 (20...

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    A., H¨ ubener, H., De Giovannini, U

    Sato, S.A., H¨ ubener, H., De Giovannini, U., Rubio, A.: Technical review: Time- dependent density functional theory for attosecond physics ranging from gas- phase to solids. npj Computational Materials11(1), 233 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41524-025-01715-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01715-1 2025

  5. [5]

    Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A.V., Rasing, T.: Ultrafast optical manipulation of mag- netic order. Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731–2784 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.2731

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Manchon, A., ˇZelezn´ y, J., Miron, I.M., Jungwirth, T., Sinova, J., Thiaville, A., Garello, K., Gambardella, P.: Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.035004 2019

  7. [7]

    Progress in Surface Science 98(2), 100705 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2023.100705

    Liu, H., Cao, H., Meng, S.: Floquet engineering of topological states in realis- tic quantum materials via light-matter interactions. Progress in Surface Science 98(2), 100705 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2023.100705

    work page doi:10.1016/j.progsurf.2023.100705 2023

  8. [8]

    Foldy, L.L., Wouthuysen, S.A.: On the dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its non-relativistic limit. Phys. Rev.78, 29–36 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRev.78.29

    work page 1950

  9. [9]

    Manchon, A., Zhang, S.: Theory of spin torque due to spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B79, 094422 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094422 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.094422 2009

  10. [10]

    Annals of Physics325(5), 1104–1117 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.01.007

    Tokatly, I.V., Sherman, E.Y.: Gauge theory approach for diffusive and preces- sional spin dynamics in a two-dimensional electron gas. Annals of Physics325(5), 1104–1117 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.01.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.01.007 2010

  11. [11]

    Abedinpour, S.H., Vignale, G., Tokatly, I.V.: Gauge-invariant formulation of spin- current density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. B81, 125123 (2010) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125123

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.125123 2010

  12. [12]

    Masset, R

    Tatara, G.: Effective gauge field theory of spintronics. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures106, 208–238 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physe.2018.05.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2019

  13. [13]

    An Introduction to quantum field theory,

    Peskin, M.E., Schroeder, D.V.: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429503559

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  14. [14]

    Springer, ??? (2004)

    Shankar, R.: Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, ??? (2004). https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=MaUunQAACAAJ

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Physics Letters B688(1), 55–58 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.045

    Chen, P., Ji, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y.: Angular momentum in non-relativistic qed and photon contribution to spin of hydrogen atom. Physics Letters B688(1), 55–58 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.045

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.045 2010

  16. [16]

    Haidar, M., Zhong, Z.-X., Korobov, V.I., Karr, J.-P.: Nonrelativistic qed approach to the fine- and hyperfine-structure corrections of ordermα 6 andmα 6(m/m): Application to the hydrogen atom. Phys. Rev. A101, 022501 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.022501

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.022501 2020

  17. [17]

    Korobov, V.I., Karr, J.-P., Haidar, M., Zhong, Z.-X.: Hyperfine structure in the h+ 2 and hd + molecular ions at ordermα 6. Phys. Rev. A102, 022804 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.022804

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022804 2020

  18. [18]

    Haidar, M., Korobov, V.I., Hilico, L., Karr, J.-P.: Higher-order corrections to spin-orbit and spin-spin tensor interactions in hydrogen molecular ions: Theory and application to h+ 2 . Phys. Rev. A106, 022816 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.106.022816

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    PRX Quantum5, 020322 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020322

    Asano, T., Giese, E., Di Pumpo, F.: Quantum field theory for multipolar compos- ite bosons with mass defect and relativistic corrections. PRX Quantum5, 020322 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020322

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020322 2024

  20. [20]

    Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2), 107 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2011)107

    Chen, P., Ji, X., Zhang, Y.: Effective angular momentum operators in nrqed and matching at one-loop order. Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2), 107 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2011)107

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2011)107 2011

  21. [21]

    Modern Physics Letters A 30(26), 1550128 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231550128X https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231550128X 13

    Paz, G.: An introduction to nrqed. Modern Physics Letters A 30(26), 1550128 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231550128X https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231550128X 13

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773231550128x 2015

  22. [22]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J., Studer, U.M.: Gauge invariance and current algebra in nonrelativistic many-body theory. Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 733–802 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.65.733

    work page 1993

  23. [23]

    Laser induced ultrafast demagnetization: an \emph{ab-initio} perspective

    Krieger, K., Dewhurst, J., Elliott, P., Sharma, S., Gross, E.: Laser induced ultra- fast demagnetization: anab-initioperspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.6607 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Computer Physics Communications209, 92–95 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cpc.2016.09.001

    Dewhurst, J.K., Krieger, K., Sharma, S., Gross, E.K.U.: An efficient algorithm for time propagation as applied to linearized augmented plane wave method. Computer Physics Communications209, 92–95 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cpc.2016.09.001

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Kim, B., Park, N., Kim, K.-W.: Relativistic spin-lattice interaction compatible with discrete translation symmetry in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 256303 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/q46t-hck1

    work page doi:10.1103/q46t-hck1 2025

  26. [26]

    npj Computational Materials8(1), 145 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00831-6

    Tancogne-Dejean, N., Eich, F.G., Rubio, A.: Effect of spin-orbit coupling on the high harmonics from the topological dirac semimetal na3bi. npj Computational Materials8(1), 145 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00831-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00831-6 2022

  27. [27]

    Lysne, M., Murakami, Y., Sch¨ uler, M., Werner, P.: High-harmonic generation in spin-orbit coupled systems. Phys. Rev. B102, 081121 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.102.081121

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Pittalis, S., Vignale, G., Eich, F.G.: U(1)×SU(2) gauge invariance made simple for density functional approximations. Phys. Rev. B96, 035141 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035141

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.035141 2017

  29. [29]

    Nature Communications9(1), 2492 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04939-6

    Liu, Y., Besbas, J., Wang, Y., He, P., Chen, M., Zhu, D., Wu, Y., Lee, J.M., Wang, L., Moon, J., Koirala, N., Oh, S., Yang, H.: Direct visualization of current-induced spin accumulation in topological insulators. Nature Communications9(1), 2492 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04939-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04939-6 2018

  30. [30]

    Nature511(7510), 449–451 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13534

    Mellnik, A.R., Lee, J.S., Richardella, A., Grab, J.L., Mintun, P.J., Fischer, M.H., Vaezi, A., Manchon, A., Kim, E.A., Samarth, N., Ralph, D.C.: Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature511(7510), 449–451 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13534

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13534 2014

  31. [31]

    Tian, J., S ¸ahin, C., Miotkowski, I., Flatt´ e, M.E., Chen, Y.P.: Opposite current- induced spin polarizations in bulk-metallic bi 2se3 and bulk-insulating bi 2te2se topological insulator thin flakes. Phys. Rev. B103, 035412 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035412

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.035412 2021

  32. [32]

    Lai, Y.-J., Huang, M.-R., Duan, H.-J., Yang, M., Wang, R.-Q., Deng, M.- X.: Current-induced nonequilibrium hidden spin polarization in topological dirac semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 106505 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/ 14 snby-9xsr

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Nanotechnology35(19), 195704 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad2639

    Lodge, M.S., Marcellina, E., Zhu, Z., Li, X.-P., Kaczorowski, D., Fuhrer, M.S., Yang, S.A., Weber, B.: Symmetry-selective quasiparticle scattering and electric field tunability of the zrsis surface electronic structure. Nanotechnology35(19), 195704 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad2639

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ad2639 2024

  34. [34]

    Yen, Y., Guo, G.-Y.: Tunable large spin hall and spin nernst effects in the dirac semimetals ZrXY (X = Si, Ge; Y = S, Se, Te). Phys. Rev. B101, 064430 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064430

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.064430 2020

  35. [35]

    Communications Physics4(2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00555-x

    Gatti, G., Gos´ albez Mart´ ınez, D., Roth, S., Fanciulli, M., Zacchigna, M., Kall¨ ane, M., Rossnagel, K., Jozwiak, C., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., Magrez, A., Berger, H., Vobornik, I., Fujii, J., Yazyev, O., Grioni, M., Crepaldi, A.: Hidden bulk and surface effects in the spin polarization of the nodal-line semimetal zrsite. Communications Physics4(202...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00555-x 2021

  36. [36]

    Materials Chemistry and Physics101(2), 357–361 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.06.011

    An, C., Wang, S.: Diameter-selected synthesis of single crystalline trigonal sele- nium nanowires. Materials Chemistry and Physics101(2), 357–361 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.06.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.06.011 2007

  37. [37]

    Advanced Functional Materi- als12(3), 219–227 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1002/1616-3028(200203)12:3⟨219:: AID-ADFM219⟩3.0.CO;2-U

    Gates, B., Mayers, B., Cattle, B., Xia, Y.: Synthesis and characterization of uniform nanowires of trigonal selenium. Advanced Functional Materi- als12(3), 219–227 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1002/1616-3028(200203)12:3⟨219:: AID-ADFM219⟩3.0.CO;2-U

    work page doi:10.1002/1616-3028(200203)12:3 2002

  38. [38]

    Chemistry of Materials15(20), 3852–3858 (2003) https:// doi.org/10.1021/cm034193b

    Mayers, B.T., Liu, K., Sunderland, D., Xia, Y.: Sonochemical synthesis of trigonal selenium nanowires. Chemistry of Materials15(20), 3852–3858 (2003) https:// doi.org/10.1021/cm034193b . doi: 10.1021/cm034193b

    work page doi:10.1021/cm034193b 2003

  39. [39]

    Giannozzi, O

    Giannozzi, P., Andreussi, O., Brumme, T., Bunau, O., Buongiorno Nardelli, M., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Cococcioni, M., Colonna, N., Carnimeo, I., Dal Corso, A., Gironcoli, S., Delugas, P., DiStasio, R.A., Ferretti, A., Floris, A., Fratesi, G., Fugallo, G., Gebauer, R., Gerstmann, U., Giustino, F., Gorni, T., Jia, J., Kawamura, M...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 2017

  40. [40]

    Giannozzi, S

    Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G.L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., Dal Corso, A., Giron- coli, S., Fabris, S., Fratesi, G., Gebauer, R., Gerstmann, U., Gougoussis, C., Kokalj, A., Lazzeri, M., Martin-Samos, L., Marzari, N., Mauri, F., Mazzarello, R., Paolini, S., Pasquarello, A., Paulatto,...

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 2009

  41. [41]

    Physical review letters77(18), 3865 (1996)

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters77(18), 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(10), 4135–4140 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816904116 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1816904116

    Shin, D., Sato, S.A., H¨ ubener, H., Giovannini, U.D., Kim, J., Park, N., Rubio, A.: Unraveling materials berry curvature and chern numbers from real-time evolution of bloch states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(10), 4135–4140 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816904116 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1816904116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1816904116 2019

  43. [43]

    physica status solidi (b)243(5), 1121–1138 (2006)

    Yabana, K., Nakatsukasa, T., Iwata, J.-I., Bertsch, G.: Real-time, real-space implementation of the linear response time-dependent density-functional theory. physica status solidi (b)243(5), 1121–1138 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Bertsch, G.F., Iwata, J.-I., Rubio, A., Yabana, K.: Real-space, real-time method for the dielectric function. Phys. Rev. B62, 7998–8002 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.7998

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.7998 2000

  45. [45]

    Blase, X., Rubio, A., Louie, S.G., Cohen, M.L.: Mixed-space formalism for the dielectric response in periodic systems. Phys. Rev. B52, 2225–2228 (1995) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.R2225

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.52.r2225 1995

  46. [46]

    Shin, D., Lee, G., Miyamoto, Y., Park, N.: Real-time propagation via time- dependent density functional theory plus the hubbard u potential for electron– atom coupled dynamics involving charge transfer. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation12(1), 201–208 (2016) 16 Supplementary Information of Gauge-Field-Mediated Symmetry Breaking of Matters Under El...

    work page 2016