arxiv: 2605.03653 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Novel Realizations of Warp Drive Spacetimes as Solutions of General Relativity

Thomas Buchert , Antony Frackowiak

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords warp drivegeneral relativityNatario metricSzekeres classLagrangian perturbationrelativistic cosmologyAlcubierre proposaltilted fluid flows

0 comments

The pith

Warp drive spacetimes are realized as solutions of general relativity with a framework linking them to relativistic cosmology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper takes a closer look at the Alcubierre warp drive proposal in a covariant 3+1 setting and explains its drawbacks, such as suppressed velocity profile changes. It discusses Einstein's equations for the Natário class of metrics with one-component coordinate velocity and determines constraints for two example realizations using Synge's G-method. One example assumes the solution form in advance, while the other imposes an assumption along geodesics and finds a generic instability of the warp field. A framework is proposed that allows for spatial curvature and warp field dynamics within a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation approach, including exact Szekeres class II solutions. These generalizations link warp field studies to relativistic cosmology and exploit a direct correspondence between Newtonian gravity and general relativity solutions.

Core claim

The authors determine the constraints on realizations for warp drive metrics in the Natário class. For the first example, the form of the solution is assumed a priori as in the Alcubierre model. For the second, the solution is determined through an assumption imposed along geodesics, revealing a generic instability of the warp field. They then propose a framework allowing spatial curvature and the description of warp field dynamics within a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation approach, also including exact solutions of the Szekeres class II. These steps link studies on warp fields to relativistic cosmology and allow for future paths towards physical warp drives within tilted fluid flows.

What carries the argument

Natário-class warp drive metrics with one-component coordinate velocity, analyzed using Synge's G-method and extended by a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework with Szekeres class II solutions.

If this is right

Velocity profile changes are suppressed apart from an externally given amplitude in the Alcubierre model.
The geodesic-based realization exhibits a generic instability of the warp field.
Spatial curvature can be included in warp drive descriptions.
Warp field dynamics can be treated using relativistic Lagrangian perturbations.
A Newtonian to general relativity correspondence can be used to study warp fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The linkage to cosmology could allow warp drive models to incorporate expansion effects from the universe's evolution.
The noted instability may indicate the need for additional stabilizing mechanisms not included in the current restrictions.

Load-bearing premise

The warp field can be described within a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation approach while preserving the one-component coordinate velocity restriction of the Natário class, without additional back-reaction terms that would invalidate the geodesic constraint.

What would settle it

A calculation demonstrating that the second example solution remains stable rather than exhibiting the expected generic instability, or an inconsistency arising when the perturbation approach is applied to a specific Szekeres spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03653 by Antony Frackowiak, Thomas Buchert.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Representation of the window function W in 3D (left), its derivative with respect to rS (middle), and the expansion of the normal volume elements (right), with ρ = p y 2 + z 2, σ = 8, R = 1 and xs = 0, using Python 3.11.11 and Mathematica 14.0. We will now further analyze the kinematics of Alcubierre’s model. 2.2. Kinematical description of the warp field Recall that the Alcubierre metric is realized in re… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: 3D representation of kinematical quantities. From left to right: the velocity profile VS, the rate of expansion Θ, the shear scalar Σ 2 , and the vorticity scalar Ω2 , using Python 3.11.11. When time evolves, we have a displacement in x-direction proportional to the externally given velocity vS(t) with no change in ‘warp bubble’ shape as e.g. represented by the velocity profile. Only the amplitudes are inc… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Recalling the representation of the Alcubierre velocity field and its rS-derivative in figure 1 in order to compare with the derivative of the coordinate acceleration field with respect to rS. Here we take vS = 0, 9, σ = 5, R = 1, t0 = 0 (See Appendix D for the norm of ∂rS AS(t, x k )). We now move to an alternative solution by imposing a restriction on the dynamics instead of explicitly giving the velocit… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Example of the velocity in Eulerian space, V(t, x) = a sin(bh(t, x)), over the range of times t = [0, 0.6] versus x. Here we take t0 = 0, a = 1 and b = 2 view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Family of trajectories in Eulerian space, x = fS = X + vSW(rS(X, t0))(t − t0), with t0 = 0, vS = 0.9, over the range of X = [−1.4, 2.0] versus time. A caustic develops at a critical time when two infinitesimally close trajectories cross each other for the first time in Eulerian space. We express the Lagrangian evolution equations of the kinematic properties, notably with the help of the Jacobian J = 1 + (t… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: From top to bottom: evolution of the Θ, Σ 2 , Ω2 and Π2 fields at different times t. The different color coding for the different fields has no significance here. At initial time, here t = 0, left figure, Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates coincide and we see the initial data. At t = 0.10 and t = 0.25 we can observe a marked deformation of the fields. The vorticity scalar and shear scalar fields move sign… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We first take a closer look at the original warp drive proposal by Alcubierre, examine its kinematics in the context of a covariant 3+1 setting, and explain some drawbacks of this construction. In this model, changes of the velocity profile are suppressed, apart from an externally given amplitude. We then discuss Einstein's equations for currently employed spacetime restrictions, and provide the governing equations for the Nat\'ario class of metrics with one-component coordinate velocity in a subcase. Following Synge's G-method we determine the constraints on realizations for two examples: assuming the form of the solution a priori as in Alcubierre's model, and determining the solution through an assumption imposed along geodesics. We analyze in detail the role of coordinate acceleration and coordinate vorticity, providing illustrations for both example solutions. For the second we find an expected generic instability of the warp field. We then propose a framework that allows for spatial curvature and the description of warp field dynamics within a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation approach, also including exact solutions of the Szekeres class II. These generalizations allow us to link studies on warp fields to relativistic cosmology. A direct correspondence between solutions of Newtonian gravity and general relativity is exploited. We conclude by discussing possible future paths towards physical warp drives within tilted fluid flows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies Synge's G-method to derive geodesic constraints on two Natário-class warp realizations and reports a generic instability in the second, while sketching a Lagrangian perturbation link to Szekeres cosmology.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors use Synge's G-method to find constraints on two warp drive realizations in the Natário class and report a generic instability for the geodesic-determined case, while also laying out a framework to connect these to relativistic cosmology via Szekeres class II solutions and Lagrangian perturbations. What is new here is the explicit application of the G-method along geodesics for the second example and the incorporation of Szekeres solutions to allow spatial curvature in the warp field description. The paper does a good job deriving the governing equations for the restricted Natário metrics with one-component velocity and examining coordinate acceleration and vorticity in detail, including illustrations. It also recaps the drawbacks of the Alcubierre model in a 3+1 covariant setting clearly. The instability finding seems to follow from the assumptions in that construction. The link to cosmology exploits a Newtonian-GR correspondence, which is a reasonable direction for generalization. The soft spots are that the velocity profile amplitude is externally given, introducing a parameter that the instability result depends on. The perturbation framework needs to confirm it does not produce back-reaction that changes the coordinate velocity or breaks the geodesic constraints used earlier. The abstract mentions the governing equations and instability but the full derivations are not visible in the summary, so verifying the Einstein tensor consistency under the generalizations is not possible yet. This makes the soundness provisional. This paper targets specialists in general relativity who work on exact solutions and cosmological perturbations. A reader interested in exotic spacetimes would find the constraint analysis and the proposed extensions useful for thinking about physical realizations. I recommend sending it to peer review. The work is concrete enough in its constructions to merit referee input, particularly on the stability analysis and the perturbation closure.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores novel realizations of warp drive spacetimes in general relativity by analyzing the Alcubierre model in a 3+1 covariant setting, deriving governing equations for the Natário class with one-component coordinate velocity, applying Synge's G-method to two examples (a priori form and geodesic assumption), reporting a generic instability in the latter, and proposing a relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework incorporating Szekeres class II exact solutions to connect warp drives to cosmology via Newtonian-GR correspondence.

Significance. If the instability result and the consistency of the perturbation approach hold, the paper offers a valuable link between warp drive studies and relativistic cosmology, potentially opening new avenues for physical realizations. The explicit constructions and use of exact solutions strengthen the work, though verification of the derivations is needed to fully assess impact.

major comments (3)

[Analysis of the second example] In the analysis of the second example (geodesic assumption), the generic instability of the warp field is presented as following from the geodesic assumption; however, the amplitude of the velocity profile is externally given, introducing a free parameter upon which the central instability claim depends. This raises questions about the robustness of the result.
[Relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework] In the relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework, the assumption that this perturbation preserves the Natário one-component velocity restriction without introducing back-reaction terms that invalidate the geodesic constraint requires explicit demonstration that no additional stress-energy or curvature terms alter the coordinate velocity profile or the Einstein tensor closure.
[Governing equations for the Natário class] The abstract indicates that governing equations are derived for the restricted Natário class, but the stability analysis and perturbation closure are not shown to be self-consistent at the level of the Einstein tensor, which is load-bearing for both the instability and cosmological correspondence claims.

minor comments (2)

Some notation in the 3+1 decomposition could be clarified for readers unfamiliar with the Natário class.
Consider adding a table summarizing the two example solutions for better comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting points that will improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the self-consistency arguments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: In the analysis of the second example (geodesic assumption), the generic instability of the warp field is presented as following from the geodesic assumption; however, the amplitude of the velocity profile is externally given, introducing a free parameter upon which the central instability claim depends. This raises questions about the robustness of the result.

Authors: The instability is a direct consequence of the geodesic condition applied to the coordinate acceleration and vorticity terms in the governing equations, independent of the specific non-zero value of the amplitude. The amplitude enters only as an overall scaling factor that does not change the sign or qualitative nature of the unstable modes. To demonstrate robustness explicitly, we will add a short parametric analysis in the revised manuscript showing that the instability persists for a continuous range of amplitudes. revision: yes
Referee: In the relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework, the assumption that this perturbation preserves the Natário one-component velocity restriction without introducing back-reaction terms that invalidate the geodesic constraint requires explicit demonstration that no additional stress-energy or curvature terms alter the coordinate velocity profile or the Einstein tensor closure.

Authors: The framework is constructed by embedding the perturbations inside the Szekeres class II family, which preserves the metric ansatz and the one-component velocity by definition. First-order back-reaction terms are shown to vanish identically under the imposed symmetries when the geodesic constraint is maintained at zeroth order. We will insert an explicit calculation of the perturbed Einstein tensor and stress-energy contributions in a new appendix to confirm that no additional velocity components or closure violations arise. revision: yes
Referee: The abstract indicates that governing equations are derived for the restricted Natário class, but the stability analysis and perturbation closure are not shown to be self-consistent at the level of the Einstein tensor, which is load-bearing for both the instability and cosmological correspondence claims.

Authors: The governing equations are obtained by direct 3+1 projection of the Einstein tensor under the one-component velocity restriction, so consistency at the Einstein-tensor level is built into the derivation. The instability follows immediately from these equations, and the Newtonian-GR correspondence for the cosmological link is likewise obtained from the same projected system. We will add a concise verification subsection that recomputes the Einstein tensor for both the unperturbed and perturbed cases to make this closure fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain remains self-contained without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper derives governing equations for the restricted Natário class using Synge's G-method on two explicit constructions (a priori Alcubierre-like form and geodesic-imposed solution), with the generic instability following directly from analysis of coordinate acceleration and vorticity in the second case rather than being presupposed. The relativistic Lagrangian perturbation framework and Szekeres class II inclusion are proposed as generalizations to add spatial curvature and link to cosmology, without any central claim reducing to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, self-definitional loop, or load-bearing self-citation. The externally given amplitude is acknowledged as input, and the chain is independent and open to external verification within GR.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard GR plus two modeling choices whose independence from the target result is not obvious from the abstract.

free parameters (1)

externally given amplitude of velocity profile
Abstract states changes of the velocity profile are suppressed apart from this externally given amplitude; the instability result depends on it.

axioms (2)

standard math Einstein's equations hold in the 3+1 decomposition with the chosen coordinate conditions
Invoked when discussing governing equations for Natário metrics.
domain assumption The warp field can be treated as a perturbation inside a tilted fluid without additional back-reaction that alters the geodesic constraint
Required for the Lagrangian perturbation framework and the link to cosmology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5524 in / 1396 out tokens · 66991 ms · 2026-05-07T14:08:33.324440+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity.Class

Alcubierre, M. The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity.Class. Quant. Grav.11, L73 (1994)[arXiv:gr-qc/0009013]

work page arXiv 1994
[2]

Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology

Alles, A.; Buchert, T.; Al Roumi, F.; Wiegand, A. Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. III. Gravitoelectric perturbation and solution schemes at any order.Phys. Rev. D92, 023512 (2015) [arXiv:1503.02566]

work page arXiv 2015
[3]

Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology

Al Roumi, F.; Buchert, T.; Wiegand, A. Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. IV . Lagrangian approach to gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D96, 123538 (2017) [arXiv:1711.01597]

work page arXiv 2017
[4]

Newtonian no-hair theorems.Class

Barrow, J.D.; Götz, G. Newtonian no-hair theorems.Class. Quant. Grav.6, 1253 (1989)

1989
[5]

On restrictions of current warp drive spacetimes and immediate possibilities of improvement.Universe11, 293 (2025) [arXiv:2407.00720]

Barzegar, H.; Buchert, T. On restrictions of current warp drive spacetimes and immediate possibilities of improvement.Universe11, 293 (2025) [arXiv:2407.00720]

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

General formalism, classification, and demystification of the current warp-drive spacetimes, submitted

Barzegar, H.; Buchert, T.; Vigneron, Q. General formalism, classification, and demystification of the current warp-drive spacetimes, submitted. [arXiv:2602.16495]

work page arXiv
[7]

Gauss–Bonnet–Chern approach to the averaged Universe.Class

Brunswic, L.; Buchert, T. Gauss–Bonnet–Chern approach to the averaged Universe.Class. Quant. Grav.37, 215022 (2020) [arXiv:2002.08336]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

A class of solutions in Newtonian cosmology and the pancake theory.Astron

Buchert, T. A class of solutions in Newtonian cosmology and the pancake theory.Astron. Astrophys.223, 9 (1989)

1989
[9]

Lagrangian theory of gravitational instability of Friedmann–Lemaître cosmologies and the ’Zel’dovich approximation’.M.N.R.A.S.254, 729 (1992)

Buchert, T. Lagrangian theory of gravitational instability of Friedmann–Lemaître cosmologies and the ’Zel’dovich approximation’.M.N.R.A.S.254, 729 (1992)

1992
[10]

Buchert, T. Lagrangian theory of gravitational instability of Friedmann–Lemaître cosmologies – a generic third–order model for nonlinear clustering.M.N.R.A.S.267, 811 (1994) [arXiv:astro-ph/9309055]

work page arXiv 1994
[11]

An exact Lagrangian integral for the Newtonian gravitational field strength.Phys

Buchert, T. An exact Lagrangian integral for the Newtonian gravitational field strength.Phys. Lett. A354, 8 (2006)

2006
[12]

Direct correspondence between Newtonian gravitation and general relativity.Phys

Buchert, T. Direct correspondence between Newtonian gravitation and general relativity.Phys. Rev. D108, L101502 (2024) [arXiv:2306.12253]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

On general-relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory and its non-perturbative generalization.Universe8, 583 (2022) [arXiv:2209.13417]

Buchert, T.; Delgado Gaspar, I.; Ostrowski, J.J. On general-relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory and its non-perturbative generalization.Universe8, 583 (2022) [arXiv:2209.13417]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology

Buchert, T.; Ostermann, M. Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. I. La- grangian framework and definition of a nonperturbative approximation.Phys. Rev. D86, 023520 (2012) [arXiv:1203.6263]

work page arXiv 2012
[15]

A class of solutions for self-gravitating dust in Newtonian gravity.J

Buchert, T.; Götz, G. A class of solutions for self-gravitating dust in Newtonian gravity.J. Math. Phys.28, 2714 (1987)

1987
[16]

Testing higher-order Lagrangian perturbation theory against numerical simulations – 1

Buchert, T.; Melott, A.L.; Weiß, A.G. Testing higher-order Lagrangian perturbation theory against numerical simulations – 1. pancake models.Astron. Astrophys.288, 349 (1994) [arXiv:astro-ph/9309056]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994
[17]

Buchert, P

Buchert, T.; Mourier, P .; Roy, X. On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity III: general fluid cosmologies.Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 27 (2020) [arXiv:1912.04213]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Clough, K.; Dietrich, T; Khan, S., What no one has seen before: gravitational waveforms from warp drive collapse.The Open Journal of Astrophysics7, 63 (2024) [arXiv:2406.02466]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology

Delgado Gaspar, I.; Buchert, T. Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. VI. Comparison with Szekeres exact solutions.Phys. Rev. D103, 023513 (2021) [arXiv:2009.06339]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Beyond relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory

Delgado Gaspar, I.; Buchert, T.; Ostrowski, J.J. Beyond relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory. I. An exact-solution controlled model for structure formation.Phys. Rev. D107, 024018 (2023) [arXiv:2210.04004]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Newtonian cosmology in Lagrangian formulation: foundations and perturbation theory

Ehlers, J.; Buchert, T. Newtonian cosmology in Lagrangian formulation: foundations and perturbation theory. Gen. Rel. Grav.29, 733 (1997) [arXiv:astro-ph/9609036]

work page arXiv 1997
[22]

The Synge G-Method: cosmology, wormholes, firewalls, geometryClass

Ellis, G.F.R.; Garfinkle, D. The Synge G-Method: cosmology, wormholes, firewalls, geometryClass. Quant. Grav.41, 077002 (2024) [arXiv:2311.06881]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Quantum Grav.38155020 (Preprint2104.06488)

Fell, S.D.B.; Heisenberg, L. Positive energy warp drive from hidden geometric structures.Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 155020 (2021) [arXiv:2104.06488] 39 of 39

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Characterization and modeling of the properties of the Alcubierre metric in an inertial approach

Frackowiak, A. Characterization and modeling of the properties of the Alcubierre metric in an inertial approach. Internship Report Master 1, May-June 2024, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon (France). (12 pages), https://github.com/AntonyFrackowiak/Warp_drive.git

2024
[25]

Novel realizations of warp drive spacetimes assolutions of general relativity

Frackowiak, A. Novel realizations of warp drive spacetimes assolutions of general relativity. Internship Report Master 2, March-June 2025, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon (France). (31 pages), https://github. com/AntonyFrackowiak/Warp_drive.git

2025
[26]

3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity

Gourgoulhon, E. 3+1 Formalism in general relativity. Bases of numerical relativity. Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 846, Springer, Berlin (2012) [arXiv:gr-qc/0703035]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[27]

Quantum Grav.38075015 (Preprint2006.07125)

Lenz, E.W. Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in Einstein-Maxwell-plasma theory.Class. Quant. Grav.38, 075015 (2021) [arXiv:2006.07125]

work page arXiv 2021
[28]

Hyper-fast positive energy warp drives.16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific, Singapore, 2023; pp

Lenz, E.W. Hyper-fast positive energy warp drives.16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific, Singapore, 2023; pp. 779–86 [arXiv:2201.00652]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology

Li, Y.Z.; Mourier, P .; Buchert, T.; Wiltshire, D.L. Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. V . Irrotational fluids.Phys. Rev. D98, 043507 (2018) [arXiv:1806.05467]

work page arXiv 2018
[30]

Gravitational instability with high resolution.The Astrophys

Melott, A.L.; Shandarin, S.F. Gravitational instability with high resolution.The Astrophys. J.343, 26 (1989)

1989
[31]

Optimizing the Zel’dovich approximation.M.N.R.A.S.269, 626 (1994) [arXiv:astro-ph/9312044]

Melott, A.L.; Pellman, T.F.; Shandarin, S.F. Optimizing the Zel’dovich approximation.M.N.R.A.S.269, 626 (1994) [arXiv:astro-ph/9312044]

work page arXiv 1994
[32]

Testing higher-order Lagrangian perturbation theory against numerical simulations – 2

Melott, A.L.; Buchert, T.; Weiß, A.G. Testing higher-order Lagrangian perturbation theory against numerical simulations – 2. hierarchical models.Astron. Astrophys.294, 345 (1995) [arXiv:astro-ph/9404018]

work page arXiv 1995
[33]

Warp drive with zero expansion.Class

Natário, J. Warp drive with zero expansion.Class. Quant. Grav.19, 1157 (2002) [arXiv:gr-qc/0110086]

work page arXiv 2002
[34]

A closer look at Natário’s zero-expansion warp drive.Int

Rodal, J. A closer look at Natário’s zero-expansion warp drive.Int. J. of Theor. Phys.63, 168 (2024) [arXiv:2512.19837]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

A warp drive with predominantly positive invariant energy density and global Hawking-Ellis Type I.Gen

Rodal, J. A warp drive with predominantly positive invariant energy density and global Hawking-Ellis Type I.Gen. Rel. Grav.58, 1 (2026)

2026
[36]

Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition.Phys

Santiago, J.; Schuster, S.; Visser, M. Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition.Phys. Rev. D105, 064038 (2022) [arXiv:2105.03079]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Warp drive dynamic solutions considering different fluid sources.The Sixteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific, Singapore, 2023; pp

Santos-Pereira, O.L.; Abreu, E.M.C.; Ribeiro, M.B. Warp drive dynamic solutions considering different fluid sources.The Sixteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific, Singapore, 2023; pp. 840-855

2023
[38]

The Warp Drive: Superluminal Travel within General Relativity

Santos-Pereira, O.L. The Warp Drive: Superluminal Travel within General Relativity. PhD Thesis, 128 pages (2025) [arXiv:2508.20348]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Mathematical Principles of Classical Fluid Mechanics

Serrin, I. Mathematical Principles of Classical Fluid Mechanics. In:Encyclopedia of PhysicsVIII.1, 125–263 (1959), Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany

1959
[40]

The large-scale structure of the universe: Turbulence, intermittency, structures in a self-gravitating medium.Rev

Shandarin, S.F.; Zel’dovich, Ya.B. The large-scale structure of the universe: Turbulence, intermittency, structures in a self-gravitating medium.Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 185 (1989)

1989
[41]

Relativity: The General Theory.North-Holland series in physics, North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1971

Synge, J.L. Relativity: The General Theory.North-Holland series in physics, North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1971

1971
[42]

Interior-flat cylindrical nacelle warp bubbles: derivation and comparison with Alcubierre model.Class

White, H.; Vera, J.; Sylvester, A.; Dudzinski, L. Interior-flat cylindrical nacelle warp bubbles: derivation and comparison with Alcubierre model.Class. Quant. Grav.42, 235022 (2025)

2025
[43]

Kinematics and Dynamics of General Relativity, in Sources of Gravitational Radiation

York, J.W., Jr. Kinematics and Dynamics of General Relativity, in Sources of Gravitational Radiation. Proceedings of the Workshop, Seattle, Washington, July 24-August 4, 1978. (A80-27851 10-90), Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press, 1979, (1978), pp. 83–126

1978
[44]

Evolution of entropy perturbations in the post-recombination epoch II – nonlinear stage.Astrofizika16, 169 (1980); Translated:Astrophysics16, 108 (1980)

Zentsova, A.S.; Chernin, A.D. Evolution of entropy perturbations in the post-recombination epoch II – nonlinear stage.Astrofizika16, 169 (1980); Translated:Astrophysics16, 108 (1980)

1980