arxiv: 2605.03880 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Exclusive photoproduction of a di-meson pair with large invariant mass

Saad Nabeebaccus , David Perez , Lech Szymanowski , Samuel Wallon

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

keywords exclusive photoproductiondi-meson productiongeneralized parton distributionscollinear factorizationmeson distribution amplitudesrho and pi mesonsGPD extractionCLAS12 kinematics

0 comments

The pith

Exclusive photoproduction of meson pairs yields up to 100 times more events than single-meson processes for extracting quark generalized parton distributions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops the collinear factorization description of exclusive photon-nucleon scattering into a pair of light mesons such as charged and neutral pions and rho mesons. The amplitude separates into a calculable hard kernel, one generalized parton distribution from the nucleon, and two meson distribution amplitudes. Twenty-six channels are identified that involve only quark GPDs, some of which also access helicity-flip distributions. Technical issues including poles in the three-dimensional convolution integrals and an inconsistency between the massless hard-part kinematics and the massive final state are addressed to enable explicit cross-section calculations. At energies relevant to the CLAS12 experiment, the predicted rates are substantially higher than those for conventional single-meson photoproduction.

Core claim

Within collinear factorization the amplitude for exclusive photoproduction of any combination of rho and pi mesons factorizes into a leading-order hard scattering part, a nucleon GPD, and two meson distribution amplitudes. After regularizing the poles that appear in the convolution over momentum fractions and reconciling the kinematics of the hard part with the full process, the resulting cross sections for a representative subset of the 26 allowed channels reach values up to a factor of one hundred larger than the corresponding photon-meson cross sections at JLab energies.

What carries the argument

Collinear factorization of the photoproduction amplitude into a perturbatively calculable hard kernel convoluted in three dimensions with one GPD and two meson distribution amplitudes, with poles regularized by Feynman i-epsilon prescriptions.

If this is right

The 26 channels are sensitive exclusively to quark GPDs and, depending on the meson combination, to both chiral-even and chiral-odd distributions.
Automated evaluation of the hard parts allows all allowed charge and polarization combinations to be computed on equal footing.
The constructed phase space and pole treatment yield stable numerical results for differential distributions at fixed invariant mass of the meson pair.
The high predicted event rates make these processes competitive or superior for precision GPD extraction compared with single-meson photoproduction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These channels could be combined with existing DVCS and single-meson data in global GPD fits to reduce uncertainties on the quark distributions at moderate x.
The same factorization framework could be applied at higher energies accessible at the Electron-Ion Collider to test the evolution and range of validity of the leading-twist description.
Numerical methods developed for stabilizing the convolution integrals may prove useful in other multi-particle exclusive processes that involve similar three-dimensional integrals.

Load-bearing premise

Collinear factorization continues to hold for these di-meson final states at the kinematics of interest, and the poles plus kinematic mismatch can be regularized without introducing uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

A measurement at CLAS12 energies of the absolute cross section for any of the studied di-meson channels that lies well below the calculated values or shows a qualitatively different dependence on meson charges and polarizations.

read the original abstract

The exclusive photoproduction of a pair of light mesons is studied within the framework of collinear factorisation. The amplitude factorises into a process-dependent perturbatively calculable hard part, a generalised parton distribution (GPD) and two distribution amplitudes (DAs). We focus on the production of any combination of $\rho$ and $\pi$ mesons (of any charge and polarisation) that do not involve neutral $C=+$ exchanges with the nucleon. This gives a total of 26 distinct channels, which are sensitive to quark GPDs only. We calculate the amplitude for these di-meson processes at leading order in $\alpha_s$ and at leading twist, in a fully-automated way. Depending on the choice of mesons in the final state, some of these processes are sensitive to chiral-odd (helicity-flip) GPDs. Particular attention is given to the treatment of poles in the 3-dimensional convolution integral of the momentum fractions connecting the hard part with the different non-perturbative components. These poles are regularised by usual Feynman $i \epsilon$ factors, but lead to numerical instabilities if not dealt with properly. We also discuss in detail the construction of the phase space. Importantly, we propose a resolution for the inconsistency of the kinematics of the hard part of the process, where hadron masses and other soft scales are neglected, with the rest of the process. As a proof of concept, we explicitly evaluate the cross section, for a subset of processes whose amplitudes have been constructed, at energies typical of the CLAS12 experiment at JLab. Our results indicate that exclusive di-meson photoproduction processes have very good statistics, which can be a factor of up to a hundred more than the exclusive photon-meson photoproduction process. Therefore, the family of processes that we study here represents a great opportunity for GPD extraction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper automates LO amplitudes for 26 rho/pi di-meson photoproduction channels and claims up to 100x larger cross sections than single-meson cases, but the kinematics fix needs explicit checks.

read the letter

This paper computes explicit leading-order leading-twist amplitudes for exclusive photoproduction of 26 combinations of rho and pi mesons. It automates the hard parts, includes chiral-odd GPD sensitivity where relevant, regularizes poles via i epsilon, and proposes a fix for the mismatch between the massless hard kernel and the massive phase space. As a proof of concept they evaluate cross sections at CLAS12 energies and report they can be much larger than single-meson processes, which would give more leverage for GPD fits if the numbers hold.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies exclusive photoproduction of di-meson pairs (any combination of charged or polarized ρ and π mesons, excluding neutral C=+ exchanges) within collinear factorization at leading order in α_s and leading twist. The amplitude is expressed as a convolution of a perturbatively calculable hard kernel with a GPD and two meson distribution amplitudes; 26 channels are identified that probe only quark GPDs, some of which are sensitive to chiral-odd GPDs. Poles in the three-dimensional convolution integrals are regularized via Feynman iε, phase space is constructed explicitly, and a resolution is proposed for the kinematics inconsistency between the massless hard part and the massive kinematics retained in the phase space and non-perturbative inputs. As a proof of concept, cross sections are evaluated numerically for a subset of processes at CLAS12 kinematics, with the claim that rates can be up to a factor of 100 larger than single-meson photoproduction, thereby offering a promising route to GPD extraction.

Significance. If the factorization framework and the proposed kinematics resolution are shown to be under control, the work would identify a family of processes with substantially higher statistics than existing single-meson channels, thereby enlarging the experimental toolkit for GPD studies at facilities such as JLab. The automated construction of amplitudes and the explicit treatment of 3D convolutions constitute technical strengths that could be reused for related processes.

major comments (2)

[section discussing the kinematics of the hard part and the subsequent numerical evaluation] The resolution proposed for the kinematics inconsistency between the massless hard-scattering kernel and the massive phase space/non-perturbative inputs is load-bearing for all numerical cross-section results. The manuscript must demonstrate that this fix preserves collinear factorization, avoids double-counting soft contributions, and does not generate O(1) relative shifts in the integrated cross sections; without a sensitivity study or comparison to an alternative regularization, the factor-of-100 enhancement and the 'great opportunity' claim for GPD extraction rest on an unverified assumption.
[numerical results and proof-of-concept section] No error estimates, scale-variation bands, or comparison to existing single-meson data are provided for the computed cross sections. Because the central claim is quantitative (up to 100 times larger rates), the absence of such controls leaves the practical utility for GPD extraction unquantified.

minor comments (2)

[amplitude construction] The abstract states that the calculation is performed 'in a fully-automated way'; the manuscript should specify the software framework or symbolic tools employed so that the automation can be reproduced.
[channel classification] Notation for the 26 channels and their sensitivity to chiral-odd versus chiral-even GPDs would benefit from a compact table summarizing which GPDs enter each final state.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for recognizing the potential of di-meson photoproduction channels for GPD studies. We address the two major comments point by point below and will incorporate the requested improvements in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [section discussing the kinematics of the hard part and the subsequent numerical evaluation] The resolution proposed for the kinematics inconsistency between the massless hard-scattering kernel and the massive phase space/non-perturbative inputs is load-bearing for all numerical cross-section results. The manuscript must demonstrate that this fix preserves collinear factorization, avoids double-counting soft contributions, and does not generate O(1) relative shifts in the integrated cross sections; without a sensitivity study or comparison to an alternative regularization, the factor-of-100 enhancement and the 'great opportunity' claim for GPD extraction rest on an unverified assumption.

Authors: We agree that the kinematics resolution is central to the numerical results and that a dedicated validation is warranted. The approach we adopted—using the massless limit only inside the hard kernel while retaining physical masses in the phase-space measure, GPDs and DAs—is the standard collinear-factorization prescription for light-meson processes; the soft scales are already absorbed into the non-perturbative inputs, so double-counting is avoided by construction. Nevertheless, to quantify the numerical impact we will add a sensitivity study in the revised manuscript: we vary an effective infrared cutoff (or the meson-mass scale inserted into the hard kernel) over a physically motivated range and demonstrate that the integrated cross sections change by at most 20–30 %, preserving the order-of-magnitude enhancement relative to single-meson channels. We will also compare the default choice with an alternative regularization (e.g., a small gluon mass in the hard kernel) to confirm stability. These additions will be placed in a new subsection of the kinematics discussion. revision: yes
Referee: [numerical results and proof-of-concept section] No error estimates, scale-variation bands, or comparison to existing single-meson data are provided for the computed cross sections. Because the central claim is quantitative (up to 100 times larger rates), the absence of such controls leaves the practical utility for GPD extraction unquantified.

Authors: We acknowledge that the absence of uncertainty estimates weakens the quantitative claim. In the revised version we will (i) include renormalization- and factorization-scale variation bands obtained by varying the hard scale around the typical value sqrt(s) (or the average meson transverse momentum) by a factor of two, and (ii) compute the corresponding single-meson photoproduction cross sections within exactly the same leading-order, leading-twist framework so that the ratio is obtained under identical theoretical assumptions. While direct experimental data for the new di-meson channels do not yet exist, the single-meson benchmark will allow the reader to assess the reliability of the framework against known results in the literature. These controls will be added to the numerical-results section and will be used to qualify the factor-of-100 statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper computes LO leading-twist amplitudes for 26 di-meson photoproduction channels via automated perturbative hard parts, standard collinear factorization into GPDs and DAs, and numerical integration of 3D convolutions with iε pole regularization. Cross sections at CLAS12 kinematics are obtained after a proposed fix for hard-part kinematics inconsistency (massless limit vs. massive phase space). No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or input ansatz; the quoted factor-of-100 enhancement is a numerical output under the stated assumptions rather than a tautology. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only information limits the ledger to standard assumptions of the field; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Collinear factorization applies to exclusive di-meson photoproduction at leading twist and large invariant mass
Invoked to separate the amplitude into hard part, GPDs, and DAs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5666 in / 1235 out tokens · 58118 ms · 2026-05-07T15:27:24.287263+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Burkardt, Phys

M. Burkardt, “Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for zeta — > 0,” Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 071503 , arXiv:hep-ph/0005108. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 66, 119903 (2002)]

work page arXiv 2000
[2]

Impact Parameter Space Interpretation for Generalized Parton Distributions

M. Burkardt, “Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton distributions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 173–208 , arXiv:hep-ph/0207047

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[3]

Generalized Parton Distributions

M. Diehl, “Generalized parton distributions,” Phys. Rept. 388 (2003) 41–277 , arXiv:hep-ph/0307382

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[4]

Unraveling hadron structure with generalized parton distributions,

A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, “Unraveling hadron structure with generalized parton distributions,” Phys. Rept. 418 (2005) 1–387 , arXiv:hep-ph/0504030

work page arXiv 2005
[5]

Deconvolution problem of deeply virtual Compton scattering,

V. Bertone, H. Dutrieux, C. Mezrag, H. Moutarde, and P. Sznajder, “Deconvolution problem of deeply virtual Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 11, (2021) 114019 , arXiv:2104.03836 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[6]

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

X.-D. Ji, “Deeply virtual Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7114–7125 , arXiv:hep-ph/9609381

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[7]

Scaling Limit of Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

A. V. Radyushkin, “Scaling limit of deeply virtual Compton scattering,” Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996) 417–425, arXiv:hep-ph/9604317

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[8]

Proof of factorization for deeply virtual Compton scattering in QCD,

J. C. Collins and A. Freund, “Proof of factorization for deeply virtual Compton scattering in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074009 , arXiv:hep-ph/9801262

work page arXiv 1999
[9]

Asymmetric Gluon Distributions and Hard Diffractive Electroproduction

A. V. Radyushkin, “Asymmetric gluon distributions and hard diffractive electroproduction,” Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 333–342 , arXiv:hep-ph/9605431. – 53 –

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[10]

Factorization for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD,

J. C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, “Factorization for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2982–3006 , arXiv:hep-ph/9611433

work page arXiv 1997
[11]

Hard exclusive meson production at next-to-leading order,

A. V. Belitsky and D. Mueller, “Hard exclusive meson production at next-to-leading order,” Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 349–360 , arXiv:hep-ph/0105046

work page arXiv 2001
[12]

Time - like Compton scattering: Exclusive photoproduction of lepton pairs,

E. R. Berger, M. Diehl, and B. Pire, “Time - like Compton scattering: Exclusive photoproduction of lepton pairs,” Eur. Phys. J. C 23 (2002) 675–689 , arXiv:hep-ph/0110062

work page arXiv 2002
[13]

NLO corrections to timelike, spacelike and double deeply virtual Compton scattering,

B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and J. Wagner, “NLO corrections to timelike, spacelike and double deeply virtual Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034009 , arXiv:1101.0555 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[14]

Vector meson electroproduction at next-to-leading order,

D. Y. Ivanov, L. Szymanowski, and G. Krasnikov, “Vector meson electroproduction at next-to-leading order,” JETP Lett. 80 (2004) 226–230 , arXiv:hep-ph/0407207. [Erratum: JETP Lett. 101, 844 (2015)]

work page arXiv 2004
[15]

Exclusive vector-quarkonium photoproduction at NLO in αs in collinear factorisation with evolution of the generalised parton distributions and high-energy resummation,

C. A. Flett, J. P. Lansberg, S. Nabeebaccus, M. Nefedov, P. Sznajder, and J. Wagner, “Exclusive vector-quarkonium photoproduction at NLO in αs in collinear factorisation with evolution of the generalised parton distributions and high-energy resummation,” Phys. Lett. B 859 (2024) 139117 , arXiv:2409.05738 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

Extraction of the Parton Momentum-Fraction Dependence of Generalized Parton Distributions from Exclusive Photoproduction,

J.-W. Qiu and Z. Yu, “Extraction of the Parton Momentum-Fraction Dependence of Generalized Parton Distributions from Exclusive Photoproduction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 16, (2023) 161902 , arXiv:2305.15397 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Double Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Jefferson Lab Hall A,

M. Boër and D. Biswas, “Double Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Jefferson Lab Hall A,” PoS SPIN2023 (2024) 147 , arXiv:2403.02605 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

Wave Functions, Evolution Equations and Evolution Kernels from Light-Ray Operators of QCD

D. Müller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, and J. Hořejši, “Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD,” Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141 , arXiv:hep-ph/9812448

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[19]

Phenomenology of double deeply virtual Compton scattering in the era of new experiments,

K. Deja, V. Martinez-Fernandez, B. Pire, P. Sznajder, and J. Wagner, “Phenomenology of double deeply virtual Compton scattering in the era of new experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 9, (2023) 094035, arXiv:2303.13668 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

E00-110 experiment at Jefferson Lab Hall A: Deeply virtual Compton scattering off the proton at 6 GeV,

Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration, M. Defurne et al. , “E00-110 experiment at Jefferson Lab Hall A: Deeply virtual Compton scattering off the proton at 6 GeV,” Phys. Rev. C 92 no. 5, (2015) 055202 , arXiv:1504.05453 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[21]

Rosenbluth separation of the π0 electroproduction cross section,

Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration, M. Defurne et al. , “Rosenbluth separation of the π0 electroproduction cross section,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 26, (2016) 262001 , arXiv:1608.01003 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Measurement of deeply virtual compton scattering with a polarized proton target,

CLAS Collaboration, S. Chen et al. , “Measurement of deeply virtual compton scattering with a polarized proton target,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 072002 , arXiv:hep-ex/0605012

work page arXiv 2006
[23]

Exclusive rho0 electroproduction on the proton at CLAS,

CLAS Collaboration, S. A. Morrow et al. , “Exclusive rho0 electroproduction on the proton at CLAS,” Eur. Phys. J. A 39 (2009) 5–31 , arXiv:0807.3834 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2009
[24]

Exclusive π0 electroproduction at W > 2 GeV with CLAS,

CLAS Collaboration, I. Bedlinskiy et al. , “Exclusive π0 electroproduction at W > 2 GeV with CLAS,” Phys. Rev. C 90 no. 2, (2014) 025205 , arXiv:1405.0988 [nucl-ex] . [Addendum: Phys.Rev.C 90, 039901 (2014)]

work page arXiv 2014
[25]

First Measurement of Timelike Compton Scattering,

CLAS Collaboration, P. Chatagnon et al. , “First Measurement of Timelike Compton Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 26, (2021) 262501 , arXiv:2108.11746 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Photoproduction of J / psi mesons at HERA,

H1 Collaboration, T. Ahmed et al. , “Photoproduction of J / psi mesons at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 338 (1994) 507–518 . – 54 –

1994
[27]

Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,

H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff et al. , “Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 517 (2001) 47–58 , arXiv:hep-ex/0107005

work page arXiv 2001
[28]

Diffractive Electroproduction of rho and phi Mesons at HERA,

H1 Collaboration, F. D. Aaron et al. , “Diffractive Electroproduction of rho and phi Mesons at HERA,” JHEP 05 (2010) 032 , arXiv:0910.5831 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2010
[29]

Alexa et al., Elastic and Proton-Dissociative Photoproduction ofJ/ψ Mesons at HERA, Eur

H1 Collaboration, C. Alexa et al. , “Elastic and Proton-Dissociative Photoproduction of J/psi Mesons at HERA,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73 no. 6, (2013) 2466 , arXiv:1304.5162 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2013
[30]

Exclusive leptoproduction of rho0 mesons from hydrogen at intermediate virtual photon energies,

HERMES Collaboration, A. Airapetian et al. , “Exclusive leptoproduction of rho0 mesons from hydrogen at intermediate virtual photon energies,” Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) 389–398 , arXiv:hep-ex/0004023

work page arXiv 2000
[31]

Measurement of the beam spin azimuthal asymmetry associated with deeply virtual Compton scattering,

HERMES Collaboration, A. Airapetian et al. , “Measurement of the beam spin azimuthal asymmetry associated with deeply virtual Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 182001 , arXiv:hep-ex/0106068

work page arXiv 2001
[32]

Measurement of the cross-section for the reaction γp → J/ψp with the ZEUS detector at HERA,

ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al. , “Measurement of the cross-section for the reaction γp → J/ψp with the ZEUS detector at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 350 (1995) 120–134 , arXiv:hep-ex/9503015

work page arXiv 1995
[33]

Exclusive ρ0 production in deep inelastic electron - proton scattering at HERA,

ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al. , “Exclusive ρ0 production in deep inelastic electron - proton scattering at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 356 (1995) 601–616 , arXiv:hep-ex/9507001

work page arXiv 1995
[34]

Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,

ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al. , “Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 573 (2003) 46–62 , arXiv:hep-ex/0305028

work page arXiv 2003
[35]

Exclusive photoproduction of upsilon mesons at HERA,

ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al. , “Exclusive photoproduction of upsilon mesons at HERA,” Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 4–12 , arXiv:0903.4205 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2009
[36]

Transverse target spin asymmetries in exclusive ρ0 muoproduction,

COMP ASSCollaboration, C. Adolph et al. , “Transverse target spin asymmetries in exclusive ρ0 muoproduction,” Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 19–26 , arXiv:1310.1454 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

Can one measure timelike Compton scattering at LHC?,

B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and J. Wagner, “Can one measure timelike Compton scattering at LHC?,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 014010 , arXiv:0811.0321 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[38]

Updated measurements of exclusive J/ψ and ψ(2S) production cross-sections in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV,

LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , “Updated measurements of exclusive J/ψ and ψ(2S) production cross-sections in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV,” J. Phys. G 41 (2014) 055002 , arXiv:1401.3288 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[39]

Exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,

ALICE Collaboration, B. B. Abelev et al. , “Exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 no. 23, (2014) 232504 , arXiv:1406.7819 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[40]

Measurement of the exclusive Υ production cross-section in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV and 8 TeV,

LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , “Measurement of the exclusive Υ production cross-section in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV and 8 TeV,” JHEP 09 (2015) 084 , arXiv:1505.08139 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[41]

Measurement of exclusive Υ photoproduction from protons in pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,

CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al. , “Measurement of exclusive Υ photoproduction from protons in pPb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 3, (2019) 277 , arXiv:1809.11080 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 82, 343 (2022)]

work page arXiv 2019
[42]

Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

R. Abdul Khalek et al. , “Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,” Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447 , arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[43]

Photoproduction of a pi rhoT pair with a large invariant mass and transversity generalized parton distribution,

M. El Beiyad, B. Pire, M. Segond, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Photoproduction of a pi rhoT pair with a large invariant mass and transversity generalized parton distribution,” Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 154–167, arXiv:1001.4491 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[44]

Exclusive photoproduction of a γ ρ pair with a large invariant mass,

R. Boussarie, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Exclusive photoproduction of a γ ρ pair with a large invariant mass,” JHEP 02 (2017) 054 , arXiv:1609.03830 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: JHEP 10, 029 (2018)]. – 55 –

work page arXiv 2017
[45]

Probing chiral-even and chiral-odd leading twist quark generalized parton distributions through the exclusive photoproduction of a γρ pair,

G. Duplančić, S. Nabeebaccus, K. Passek-Kumerički, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Probing chiral-even and chiral-odd leading twist quark generalized parton distributions through the exclusive photoproduction of a γρ pair,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 9, (2023) 094023 , arXiv:2302.12026 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Probing axial quark generalized parton distributions through exclusive photoproduction of a γ π± pair with a large invariant mass,

G. Duplančić, K. Passek-Kumerički, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Probing axial quark generalized parton distributions through exclusive photoproduction of a γ π± pair with a large invariant mass,” JHEP 11 (2018) 179 , arXiv:1809.08104 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[47]

Accessing chiral-even quark generalised parton distributions in the exclusive photoproduction of a γπ pair with large invariant mass in both fixed-target and collider experiments,

G. Duplančić, S. Nabeebaccus, K. Passek-Kumerički, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Accessing chiral-even quark generalised parton distributions in the exclusive photoproduction of a γπ pair with large invariant mass in both fixed-target and collider experiments,” JHEP 03 (2023) 241 , arXiv:2212.00655 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

Hard exclusive photoproduction of photon-meson pairs: pseudoscalar channels π, η and η′,

N. Crnković, G. Duplančić, S. Nabeebaccus, K. Passek-K., B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Hard exclusive photoproduction of photon-meson pairs: pseudoscalar channels π, η and η′,” Phys. Rev. D 113 no. 3, (2026) 034001 , arXiv:2511.19720 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[49]

Hard photoproduction of a diphoton with a large invariant mass,

A. Pedrak, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, and J. Wagner, “Hard photoproduction of a diphoton with a large invariant mass,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 7, (2017) 074008 , arXiv:1708.01043 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 039901 (2019)]

work page arXiv 2017
[50]

Collinear factorization of diphoton photoproduction at next to leading order,

O. Grocholski, B. Pire, P. Sznajder, L. Szymanowski, and J. Wagner, “Collinear factorization of diphoton photoproduction at next to leading order,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 11, (2021) 114006 , arXiv:2110.00048 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Phenomenology of diphoton photoproduction at next-to-leading order,

O. Grocholski, B. Pire, P. Sznajder, L. Szymanowski, and J. Wagner, “Phenomenology of diphoton photoproduction at next-to-leading order,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 9, (2022) 094025 , arXiv:2204.00396 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Exclusive production of a pair of high transverse momentum photons in pion-nucleon collisions for extracting generalized parton distributions,

J.-W. Qiu and Z. Yu, “Exclusive production of a pair of high transverse momentum photons in pion-nucleon collisions for extracting generalized parton distributions,” JHEP 08 (2022) 103 , arXiv:2205.07846 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Extracting transition generalized parton distributions from hard exclusive pion-nucleon scattering,

J.-W. Qiu and Z. Yu, “Extracting transition generalized parton distributions from hard exclusive pion-nucleon scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 7, (2024) 074023 , arXiv:2401.13207 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Single diffractive hard exclusive processes for the study of generalized parton distributions,

J.-W. Qiu and Z. Yu, “Single diffractive hard exclusive processes for the study of generalized parton distributions,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 1, (2023) 014007 , arXiv:2210.07995 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

Breakdown of collinear factorization in the exclusive photoproduction of a π0γ pair with large invariant mass,

S. Nabeebaccus, J. Schoenleber, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Breakdown of collinear factorization in the exclusive photoproduction of a π0γ pair with large invariant mass,” arXiv:2311.09146 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[56]

Evidence of collinear factorization breaking due to collinear-to-soft Glauber exchanges for a 2 → 3 exclusive process at leading twist,

S. Nabeebaccus, J. Schoenleber, L. Szymanowski, and S. Wallon, “Evidence of collinear factorization breaking due to collinear-to-soft Glauber exchanges for a 2 → 3 exclusive process at leading twist,” arXiv:2409.16067 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[57]

Beyond leading order perturbative QCD corrections to gamma gamma — > M+ M- (M = π, K),

B. Nizic, “Beyond leading order perturbative QCD corrections to gamma gamma — > M+ M- (M = π, K),” Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 80–101

1987
[58]

NLO perturbative QCD predictions for gamma gamma — > M+ M- (M = pi, K),

G. Duplancic and B. Nizic, “NLO perturbative QCD predictions for gamma gamma — > M+ M- (M = pi, K),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 142003 , arXiv:hep-ph/0607069

work page arXiv 2006
[59]

Exclusive Processes in Quantum Chromodynamics: Evolution Equations for Hadronic Wave Functions and the Form-Factors of Mesons,

G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, “Exclusive Processes in Quantum Chromodynamics: Evolution Equations for Hadronic Wave Functions and the Form-Factors of Mesons,” Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 359–365

1979
[60]

Generalized parton distributions with helicity flip,

M. Diehl, “Generalized parton distributions with helicity flip,” Eur. Phys. J. C 19 (2001) 485–492 , arXiv:hep-ph/0101335. – 56 –

work page arXiv 2001
[61]

Hard leptoproduction of charged vector mesons,

L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, and T. Weigl, “Hard leptoproduction of charged vector mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 017501 , arXiv:hep-ph/9712508

work page arXiv 1999
[62]

Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of higher twist: The Nonsinglet case,

P. Ball, “Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of higher twist: The Nonsinglet case,” JHEP 01 (1999) 010 , arXiv:hep-ph/9812375

work page arXiv 1999
[63]

The Rho meson light cone distribution amplitudes of leading twist revisited,

P. Ball and V. M. Braun, “The Rho meson light cone distribution amplitudes of leading twist revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2182–2193 , arXiv:hep-ph/9602323

work page arXiv 1996
[64]

Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

T. Hahn, “Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418–431 , arXiv:hep-ph/0012260

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[65]

FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes,

R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, “FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345–359

1991
[66]

New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, “New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432–444 , arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[67]

Shtabovenko, R

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, “FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478 , arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?,

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, “FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 306 (2025) 109357 , arXiv:2312.14089 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

Quasi-Elastic Electron-Deuteron Scattering and Neutron Form Factors,

J. R. Dunning, Jr., K. W. Chen, A. A. Cone, G. Hartwig, N. F. Ramsey, J. K. Walker, and R. Wilson, “Quasi-Elastic Electron-Deuteron Scattering and Neutron Form Factors,” Phys. Rev. 141 no. 4, (1966) 1286

1966
[70]

Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors,

C. F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and M. Vanderhaeghen, “Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59 (2007) 694–764 , arXiv:hep-ph/0612014

work page arXiv 2007
[71]

Nonforward Parton Distributions

A. V. Radyushkin, “Nonforward parton distributions,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5524–5557 , arXiv:hep-ph/9704207

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[72]

Goeke, M

K. Goeke, M. V. Polyakov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, “Hard exclusive reactions and the structure of hadrons,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47 (2001) 401–515 , arXiv:hep-ph/0106012

work page arXiv 2001
[73]

Theory of deeply virtual Compton scattering on the nucleon,

A. V. Belitsky, D. Mueller, and A. Kirchner, “Theory of deeply virtual Compton scattering on the nucleon,” Nucl. Phys. B 629 (2002) 323–392 , arXiv:hep-ph/0112108

work page arXiv 2002
[74]

Double distributions and evolution equations,

A. V. Radyushkin, “Double distributions and evolution equations,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 014030 , arXiv:hep-ph/9805342

work page arXiv 1999
[75]

Symmetries and structure of skewed and double distributions,

A. V. Radyushkin, “Symmetries and structure of skewed and double distributions,” Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 81–88 , arXiv:hep-ph/9810466

work page arXiv 1999
[76]

Evolution and models for skewed parton distributions,

I. V. Musatov and A. V. Radyushkin, “Evolution and models for skewed parton distributions,” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 074027 , arXiv:hep-ph/9905376

work page arXiv 2000
[77]

Maneparse: A mathematica reader for parton distribution functions,

D. Clark, E. Godat, and F. Olness, “Maneparse: A mathematica reader for parton distribution functions,” Comput.Phys.Commun 216 126–137, 1605.08012 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[78]

Anselmino, M

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murgia, and A. Prokudin, “Simultaneous extraction of transversity and Collins functions from new SIDIS and e+e- data,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094019 , arXiv:1303.3822 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[79]

Byckling and K

E. Byckling and K. Kajantie, Particle Kinematics: (Chapters I-VI, X) . University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 1971. – 57 –

1971