arxiv: 2605.04143 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Composite top partners in exotic colour representations

Aldo Deandrea, Benjamin Fuks, Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Jan Hadlik, Manuel Kunkel, Mark Goodsell, Rosy Caliri, Werner Porod

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords composite Higgspartial compositenesscolor sextetstop partnersfermionic resonancesLHC phenomenologyexotic representations

0 comments

The pith

Color sextet top partners in composite Higgs models are excluded up to 2-2.5 TeV by current LHC data, with HL-LHC sensitivity reaching 3 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines color-sextet fermionic resonances that arise in certain composite Higgs models with partial compositeness. These states decay mainly through colored pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons, producing final states rich in top quarks along with possible b-jets and missing energy. The authors reinterpret existing ATLAS and CMS searches for high-multiplicity events to set mass limits on these particles. A sympathetic reader would care because these limits show that LHC data is already probing the parameter space of UV-complete models, and future runs could exclude or discover them at higher masses.

Core claim

In the minimal model classes where they arise, color-sextet fermions predominantly decay through colored pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons, leading to top-rich final states. Reinterpretation of ATLAS and CMS high-multiplicity searches excludes individual sextet components up to 2-2.5 TeV, with stronger bounds when the full multiplet is considered, and conservative HL-LHC extrapolations indicate a reach close to 3 TeV.

What carries the argument

Color-sextet fermionic resonances, whose low-energy interactions and characteristic decay patterns through pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons produce distinctive signatures used to derive LHC constraints.

If this is right

Current LHC data already excludes these sextet components in the 2-2.5 TeV mass range for benchmark spectra.
Stronger exclusion limits apply when considering the complete sextet multiplet rather than individual components.
HL-LHC data should extend the sensitivity to masses around 3 TeV under conservative assumptions.
Color-sextet fermions serve as a powerful and largely unexplored probe of composite Higgs models with partial compositeness.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Discovery of such states would favor specific hypercolor constructions over others that lack sextets.
The top-rich decay channels could be used to distinguish sextet partners from more commonly studied triplet or octet resonances.
Targeted analyses including b-jet and missing transverse energy channels might further improve the bounds beyond current reinterpretations.

Load-bearing premise

The reinterpretation of existing ATLAS and CMS high-multiplicity searches accurately captures signal efficiencies and backgrounds for the derived sextet decay channels without significant kinematic mismatches or unaccounted systematics.

What would settle it

A dedicated search for high-multiplicity top-rich final states at the LHC that finds no excess above Standard Model backgrounds in the kinematic regions where 2 TeV sextet signals are predicted, or conversely observes a signal rate inconsistent with the model's decay branching ratios.

read the original abstract

Composite Higgs models with partial compositeness generically predict coloured fermionic resonances associated with the strong dynamics responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking. While most phenomenological studies have focused on colour-triplet and colour-octet top partners, several UV-complete hypercolour constructions also contain fermionic colour sextets. We present a systematic study of these states in the minimal model classes where they arise, constructing the relevant low-energy interactions and deriving their characteristic decay patterns. The sextets predominantly decay through coloured pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons, leading to top-rich final states, while additional channels with $b$-jets and missing transverse energy can be important. We reinterpret existing ATLAS and CMS searches for high-multiplicity final states to derive the dedicated constraints on these resonances. For the benchmark spectra considered, current LHC data exclude individual sextet components up to masses in the $2-2.5$ TeV regime, with stronger bounds when the full sextet multiplet is included, while conservative extrapolations to the HL-LHC indicate a reach close to $3$ TeV. Our results therefore show that colour-sextet fermions provide a powerful and largely unexplored probe of composite Higgs models with partial compositeness.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives the first systematic limits on colour-sextet top partners from recast LHC searches, but the efficiency assumptions in the reinterpretation need checking.

read the letter

The punchline is that this is the first dedicated study of colour-sextet fermionic resonances in minimal composite Higgs models with partial compositeness. The authors build the low-energy interactions, work out that the sextets decay mainly through coloured pNGBs into top-rich final states plus some b-jet and MET modes, and then recast existing ATLAS and CMS high-multiplicity searches to claim exclusions around 2-2.5 TeV for single components, tighter when the full multiplet is considered, and up to about 3 TeV at HL-LHC for the benchmarks they pick. That fills a clear gap, since most prior work stayed with triplets and octets. They do the effective-theory construction in a standard way and the decay patterns follow logically from the quantum numbers. The recast itself is the part that supplies the actual numbers, and they are careful to note the benchmark dependence. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags: the limits rest on how well the signal efficiencies and background shapes from the original searches match the kinematics of these particular decay chains. Jet multiplicity, pT spectra, b-tagging, and MET tails could differ enough to shift the bounds, and without seeing the detailed validation tables it is hard to judge the size of that uncertainty. The paper does not appear to introduce new data or independent cross-checks, so the quantitative reach is only as good as the recast. This is useful reading for anyone working on composite Higgs phenomenology or exotic coloured resonances at the LHC. A reader who wants concrete mass limits on these states will get something concrete to cite or build on. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, even if the limits section will probably need some extra scrutiny on the efficiency side.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates fermionic colour-sextet resonances predicted in composite Higgs models with partial compositeness. It constructs the relevant low-energy effective interactions, derives the dominant decay patterns (primarily via coloured pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons into top-rich final states, with subdominant b-jet and MET channels), and reinterprets existing ATLAS and CMS high-multiplicity jet + b-jet + MET searches. For the benchmark spectra considered, current LHC data are shown to exclude individual sextet components up to 2-2.5 TeV, with stronger bounds when the full multiplet is included; conservative HL-LHC extrapolations indicate a reach near 3 TeV.

Significance. If the recast is robust, the work is significant because it addresses an under-explored sector of composite-Higgs phenomenology. Colour-triplet and octet top partners have received extensive study, but sextets appear in several UV-complete hypercolour constructions yet lack dedicated constraints. The derivation of characteristic decay topologies and the concrete mass limits provide falsifiable predictions that can directly inform experimental search strategies.

major comments (2)

[§5.1] §5.1 (recast of CMS high-multiplicity search): The efficiency for the sextet signal is obtained from the authors' simulation of the derived decay chains, but no validation plots or tables compare the resulting jet-multiplicity, pT spectra, b-tagging rates, or MET distributions against the original search's signal models. Without this, it is unclear whether the quoted 2-2.5 TeV exclusion accurately accounts for possible kinematic mismatches between the sextet topology and the search's assumptions.
[§4.2] §4.2 (decay patterns): The branching ratios and final-state kinematics depend sensitively on the mass hierarchy between the sextet and the coloured pNGBs. The benchmark spectra are presented, but no systematic variation or uncertainty band is shown for how shifts in these masses alter the signal efficiencies used in the recast; this directly affects the robustness of the central exclusion claim.

minor comments (2)

The introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the hypercolour groups and representations that give rise to the sextets, to make the UV motivation clearer for readers unfamiliar with the specific constructions.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 (branching-ratio plots): Adding a second panel or overlay showing the effect of varying the pNGB-sextet mass splitting would help readers assess the stability of the top-rich final-state dominance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the significance of the work on colour-sextet top partners. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve the presentation of the recast and the robustness analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§5.1] §5.1 (recast of CMS high-multiplicity search): The efficiency for the sextet signal is obtained from the authors' simulation of the derived decay chains, but no validation plots or tables compare the resulting jet-multiplicity, pT spectra, b-tagging rates, or MET distributions against the original search's signal models. Without this, it is unclear whether the quoted 2-2.5 TeV exclusion accurately accounts for possible kinematic mismatches between the sextet topology and the search's assumptions.

Authors: We agree that explicit validation strengthens the recast. In the revised manuscript we have added a new figure and accompanying table in Section 5.1 that compare the jet multiplicity, leading jet pT, b-tagging rates and MET distributions obtained from our simulated sextet events to the corresponding distributions published for the CMS signal models. While the sextet topology produces a higher multiplicity of top quarks and therefore slightly harder pT spectra than some of the original models, the distributions overlap sufficiently in the high-multiplicity region relevant to the search. We also quantify the effect of any residual kinematic differences on the signal efficiency and show that the quoted exclusion limits shift by less than 10% under conservative variations. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (decay patterns): The branching ratios and final-state kinematics depend sensitively on the mass hierarchy between the sextet and the coloured pNGBs. The benchmark spectra are presented, but no systematic variation or uncertainty band is shown for how shifts in these masses alter the signal efficiencies used in the recast; this directly affects the robustness of the central exclusion claim.

Authors: The referee is correct that the results are sensitive to the assumed mass hierarchy. We have revised Section 4.2 to include a systematic scan over the pNGB masses within the range allowed by the underlying hypercolour models. The corresponding variation in branching ratios and signal efficiencies is now shown explicitly, and uncertainty bands reflecting this variation have been added to the exclusion curves in Section 5. For the benchmark spectra chosen, which are representative of the minimal UV completions, the 2–2.5 TeV exclusion remains stable; the bands illustrate the modest weakening that occurs only for extreme hierarchies that are already disfavoured by other constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; exclusions derived from external LHC searches

full rationale

The paper constructs low-energy interactions for colour-sextet fermions from the composite Higgs model with partial compositeness, derives their decay patterns (primarily through coloured pNGBs to top-rich states), and then reinterprets independent ATLAS/CMS high-multiplicity searches to obtain mass exclusions. The central claims (exclusions to 2-2.5 TeV, HL-LHC reach ~3 TeV) rest on external data rather than fitting parameters to that data or reducing by construction to the model's inputs. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatze smuggled via prior work are present. Benchmark spectra introduce parameter dependence for illustration but do not render the data-driven bounds tautological. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the generic prediction of coloured fermionic resonances in composite Higgs models with partial compositeness and on the validity of the low-energy effective theory used to derive sextet decays; benchmark spectra introduce mass and coupling parameters whose specific values are not detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

Sextet benchmark masses and couplings
Masses and mixing parameters in the benchmark spectra used to derive the quoted exclusion limits.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Composite Higgs models with partial compositeness generically predict coloured fermionic resonances associated with the strong dynamics.
Invoked in the opening sentence of the abstract as the starting point for the study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5529 in / 1492 out tokens · 35561 ms · 2026-05-08T18:12:15.564418+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Phenomenology of electroweak spin-1 resonances
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Composite Higgs models with SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R predict spin-1 resonances mixing with electroweak bosons that remain viable at the LHC down to masses of about 1.5 TeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Implications of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking,

S. Weinberg, “Implications of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking,”Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 974–996. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 19, 1277–1280 (1979)]

1976
[2]

Mass Without Scalars,

S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, “Mass Without Scalars,”Nucl. Phys. B155(1979) 237–252

1979
[3]

Dynamical Breaking of Weak Interaction Symmetries,

E. Eichten and K. D. Lane, “Dynamical Breaking of Weak Interaction Symmetries,”Phys. Lett. B 90(1980) 125–130

1980
[4]

SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment,

D. B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, “SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment,”Phys. Lett. B136 (1984) 183–186

1984
[5]

Composite Higgs Scalars,

D. B. Kaplan, H. Georgi, and S. Dimopoulos, “Composite Higgs Scalars,”Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 187–190

1984
[6]

Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,

D. B. Kaplan, “Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,”Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 259–278

1991
[7]

Higgs as a Holographic Pseudo-Goldstone Boson

R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol, “Higgs as a Holographic Pseudo Goldstone Boson,”Nucl. Phys. B671(2003) 148–174,arXiv:hep-ph/0306259

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[8]

The Minimal Composite Higgs Model

K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The Minimal composite Higgs model,”Nucl. Phys. B 719(2005) 165–187,arXiv:hep-ph/0412089

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[9]

A Custodial symmetry forZb ¯b,

K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold, and A. Pomarol, “A Custodial symmetry forZb ¯b,”Phys. Lett. B641(2006) 62–66,arXiv:hep-ph/0605341

work page arXiv 2006
[10]

Dynamical Gauge Symmetry Breaking as the Casimir Effect,

Y. Hosotani, “Dynamical Gauge Symmetry Breaking as the Casimir Effect,”Phys. Lett. B129 (1983) 193–197

1983
[11]

Dynamical symmetry breaking in gauge Higgs unification on orbifold,

N. Haba, Y. Hosotani, Y. Kawamura, and T. Yamashita, “Dynamical symmetry breaking in gauge Higgs unification on orbifold,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 015010,arXiv:hep-ph/0401183. – 32 –

work page arXiv 2004
[12]

Higgs boson mass and electroweak-gravity hierarchy from dynamical gauge-Higgs unification in the warped spacetime,

Y. Hosotani and M. Mabe, “Higgs boson mass and electroweak-gravity hierarchy from dynamical gauge-Higgs unification in the warped spacetime,”Phys. Lett. B615(2005) 257–265, arXiv:hep-ph/0503020

work page arXiv 2005
[13]

The Alignment of the Vacuum in Theories of Technicolor,

M. E. Peskin, “The Alignment of the Vacuum in Theories of Technicolor,”Nucl. Phys. B175 (1980) 197–233

1980
[14]

Subgroup Alignment in Hypercolor Theories,

J. Preskill, “Subgroup Alignment in Hypercolor Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B177(1981) 21–59

1981
[15]

Cacciapaglia and F

G. Cacciapaglia and F. Sannino, “Fundamental Composite (Goldstone) Higgs Dynamics,”JHEP04 (2014) 111,arXiv:1402.0233 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[16]

UV Completions of Partial Compositeness: The Case for a SU(4) Gauge Group,

G. Ferretti, “UV Completions of Partial Compositeness: The Case for a SU(4) Gauge Group,” JHEP06(2014) 142,arXiv:1404.7137 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[17]

Top quark induced effective potential in a composite Higgs model,

M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, “Top quark induced effective potential in a composite Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D91no. 9, (2015) 094506,arXiv:1502.00390 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[18]

Ferretti, JHEP06(2016), 107 [arXiv:1604.06467 [hep-ph]]

G. Ferretti, “Gauge theories of Partial Compositeness: Scenarios for Run-II of the LHC,”JHEP06 (2016) 107,arXiv:1604.06467 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[19]

Agugliaroet al.,JHEP02(2019), 089 [arXiv:1808.10175 [hep-ph]]

A. Agugliaro, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, and S. De Curtis, “Vacuum misalignment and pattern of scalar masses in the SU(5)/SO(5) composite Higgs model,”JHEP02(2019) 089, arXiv:1808.10175 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[20]

Barnard, T

J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta, and T. S. Ray, “UV descriptions of composite Higgs models without elementary scalars,”JHEP02(2014) 002,arXiv:1311.6562 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[21]

Ferretti and D

G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, “Fermionic UV completions of Composite Higgs models,”JHEP03 (2014) 077,arXiv:1312.5330 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[22]

A UV complete partially composite-pNGB Higgs,

J. Galloway, A. L. Kagan, and A. Martin, “A UV complete partially composite-pNGB Higgs,” Phys. Rev. D95no. 3, (2017) 035038,arXiv:1609.05883 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[23]

UV complete composite Higgs models,

A. Agugliaro, O. Antipin, D. Becciolini, S. De Curtis, and M. Redi, “UV complete composite Higgs models,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 3, (2017) 035019,arXiv:1609.07122 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[24]

Fundamental Composite 2HDM: SU(N) with 4 flavours,

T. Ma and G. Cacciapaglia, “Fundamental Composite 2HDM: SU(N) with 4 flavours,”JHEP03 (2016) 211,arXiv:1508.07014 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[25]

A partially composite Goldstone Higgs,

T. Alanne, D. Buarque Franzosi, and M. T. Frandsen, “A partially composite Goldstone Higgs,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 9, (2017) 095012,arXiv:1709.10473 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[26]

Towards a fundamental safe theory of composite Higgs and Dark Matter,

G. Cacciapaglia, T. Ma, S. Vatani, and Y. Wu, “Towards a fundamental safe theory of composite Higgs and Dark Matter,”Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 11, (2020) 1088,arXiv:1812.04005 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Composite Higgs Meets Planck Scale: Partial Compositeness from Partial Unification,

G. Cacciapaglia, S. Vatani, and C. Zhang, “Composite Higgs Meets Planck Scale: Partial Compositeness from Partial Unification,”Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136177,arXiv:1911.05454 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[28]

Tumbling to the Top,

G. Cacciapaglia, S. Vatani, and Z.-W. Wang, “Tumbling to the Top,”arXiv:1909.08628 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1909
[29]

The Techni-Pati-Salam Composite Higgs,

G. Cacciapaglia, S. Vatani, and C. Zhang, “The Techni-Pati-Salam Composite Higgs,”Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 055001,arXiv:2005.12302 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Composite leptoquarks and anomalies inB-meson decays,

B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, and S. A. Renner, “Composite leptoquarks and anomalies inB-meson decays,”JHEP05(2015) 006,arXiv:1412.1791 [hep-ph]. – 33 –

work page arXiv 2015
[31]

A dangerous irrelevant UV-completion of the composite Higgs,

L. Vecchi, “A dangerous irrelevant UV-completion of the composite Higgs,”JHEP02(2017) 094, arXiv:1506.00623 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[32]

Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental Composite Higgs Model,

D. Marzocca, “Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental Composite Higgs Model,” JHEP07(2018) 121,arXiv:1803.10972 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[33]

Panico and A

G. Panico and A. Wulzer,The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, vol. 913. Springer, 2016. arXiv:1506.01961 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[34]

Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,

G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica, and F. Sannino, “Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,”Phys. Rept.877(2020) 1–70,arXiv:2002.04914 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[35]

On the Tuning and the Mass of the Composite Higgs,

G. Panico, M. Redi, A. Tesi, and A. Wulzer, “On the Tuning and the Mass of the Composite Higgs,”JHEP03(2013) 051,arXiv:1210.7114 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[36]

On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology,

R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo, and R. Rattazzi, “On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology,”JHEP10(2011) 081,arXiv:1109.1570 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[37]

Classification of NLO operators for composite Higgs models,

T. Alanne, N. Bizot, G. Cacciapaglia, and F. Sannino, “Classification of NLO operators for composite Higgs models,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 7, (2018) 075028,arXiv:1801.05444 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[38]

Ayyaret al.,Phys

V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, M. Golterman, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Spectroscopy of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 7, (2018) 074505,arXiv:1710.00806 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2018
[39]

Ayyaret al.,Phys

V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Partial compositeness and baryon matrix elements on the lattice,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 9, (2019) 094502, arXiv:1812.02727 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Ayyaret al.,Phys

V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Finite-temperature phase structure of SU(4) gauge theory with multiple fermion representations,” Phys. Rev. D97no. 11, (2018) 114502,arXiv:1802.09644 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2018
[41]

Ayyaret al.,Phys

V. Ayyar, T. Degrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Baryon spectrum of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations,”Phys. Rev. D 97no. 11, (2018) 114505,arXiv:1801.05809 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[42]

Ayyaret al.,Phys

V. Ayyar, M. F. Golterman, D. C. Hackett, W. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Radiative Contribution to the Composite-Higgs Potential in a Two-Representation Lattice Model,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 9, (2019) 094504,arXiv:1903.02535 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

Hasenfratzet al.,Phys

A. Hasenfratz, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, B. Svetitsky, and O. Witzel, “Infrared fixed point and anomalous dimensions in a composite Higgs model,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 11, (2023) 114504, arXiv:2304.11729 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Bennettet al.,JHEP03(2018), 185 [arXiv:1712.04220 [hep-lat]]

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Sp(4) gauge theory on the lattice: towards SU(4)/Sp(4) composite Higgs (and beyond),”JHEP03(2018) 185,arXiv:1712.04220 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2018
[45]

Bennettet al.,Phys

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.-J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, J. Rantaharju, and D. Vadacchino, “Sp(4) gauge theories on the lattice: quenched fundamental and antisymmetric fermions,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 7, (2020) 074516,arXiv:1912.06505 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[46]

Bennettet al.,JHEP12(2019), 053 [arXiv:1909.12662 [hep-lat]]

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Sp(4) gauge theories on the lattice:N f = 2 dynamical fundamental fermions,”JHEP12(2019) 053, arXiv:1909.12662 [hep-lat]. – 34 –

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

Bennettet al.,Phys

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Lattice studies of the Sp(4) gauge theory with two fundamental and three antisymmetric Dirac fermions,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 1, (2022) 014501,arXiv:2202.05516 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Kulkarniet al.,SciPost Phys.14(2023) no.3, 044 [arXiv:2202.05191 [hep-ph]]

S. Kulkarni, A. Maas, S. Mee, M. Nikolic, J. Pradler, and F. Zierler, “Low-energy effective description of darkSp(4) theories,”SciPost Phys.14no. 3, (2023) 044,arXiv:2202.05191 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

Bennettet al.,Phys

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Lattice investigations of the chimera baryon spectrum in the Sp(4) gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. D 109no. 9, (2024) 094512,arXiv:2311.14663 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Bennettet al., Phys

E. Bennett, N. Forzano, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, D. Vadacchino, and F. Zierler, “Mixing between flavor singlets in lattice gauge theories coupled to matter fields in multiple representations,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 7, (2024) 074504, arXiv:2405.05765 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Bennettet al.,Phys

E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Meson spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions,”Phys. Rev. D 111no. 7, (2025) 074511,arXiv:2412.01170 [hep-lat]. [52]TELOSCollaboration, E. Bennettet al., “Chimera baryons and mesons on the lattice: A spectral density analysis...

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Erdmengeret al.,Phys

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dynamics for composite Higgs models and the top mass,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 7, (2021) 071602,arXiv:2009.10737 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

Erdmengeret al.,JHEP02(2021), 058 [arXiv:2010.10279 [hep-ph]]

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dual dynamics for the strongly coupled sector of composite Higgs models,”JHEP02058,arXiv:2010.10279 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[54]

Elanderet al.,JHEP03(2021), 182 [arXiv:2011.03003 [hep-ph]]

D. Elander, M. Frigerio, M. Knecht, and J.-L. Kneur, “Holographic models of composite Higgs in the Veneziano limit. Part I. Bosonic sector,”JHEP03(2021) 182,arXiv:2011.03003 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

Elanderet al.,JHEP05(2022), 066 [arXiv:2112.14740 [hep-ph]]

D. Elander, M. Frigerio, M. Knecht, and J.-L. Kneur, “Holographic models of composite Higgs in the Veneziano limit. Part II. Fermionic sector,”JHEP05(2022) 066,arXiv:2112.14740 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Erdmengeret al.,Universe9(2023) no.6, 289 [arXiv:2304.09190 [hep-th]]

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, Y. Liu, and W. Porod, “Holographic Non-Abelian Flavour Symmetry Breaking,”Universe9no. 6, (2023) 289,arXiv:2304.09190 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

Erdmengeret al.,JHEP07(2024), 169 [arXiv:2404.14480 [hep-ph]]

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, Y. Liu, and W. Porod, “Holography for Sp(2N c) gauge dynamics: from composite Higgs to technicolour,”JHEP07(2024) 169,arXiv:2404.14480 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Cacciapagliaet al.,JHEP12(2022), 087 [arXiv:2210.01826 [hep-ph]]

G. Cacciapaglia, T. Flacke, M. Kunkel, W. Porod, and L. Schwarze, “Exploring extended Higgs sectors via pair production at the LHC,”JHEP12(2022) 087,arXiv:2210.01826 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[59]

Flackeet al.,JHEP11(2023), 009 [arXiv:2304.09195 [hep-ph]]

T. Flacke, J. H. Kim, M. Kunkel, P. Ko, J. S. Pi, W. Porod, and L. Schwarze, “Uncovering doubly charged scalars with dominant three-body decays using machine learning,”JHEP11(2023) 009, arXiv:2304.09195 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Singlets in composite Higgs models in light of the LHC 750 GeV diphoton excess,

A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, T. Flacke, A. Parolini, and H. Serˆ odio, “Singlets in composite Higgs models in light of the LHC 750 GeV diphoton excess,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 1, (2016) 015004, arXiv:1512.07242 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[61]

Belyaevet al.,JHEP01(2017), 094 [erratum: JHEP12(2017), 088] [arXiv:1610.06591 [hep-ph]]

A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke, A. Parolini, and H. Serodio, “Di-boson signatures as Standard Candles for Partial Compositeness,”JHEP01(2017) 094, arXiv:1610.06591 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 088 (2017)]. – 35 –

work page arXiv 2017
[62]

Light scalars in composite Higgs models,

G. Cacciapaglia, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke, and H. Serˆ odio, “Light scalars in composite Higgs models,” Front. in Phys.7(2019) 22,arXiv:1902.06890 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

Future lepton collider prospects for a ubiquitous composite pseudoscalar,

A. S. Cornell, A. Deandrea, B. Fuks, and L. Mason, “Future lepton collider prospects for a ubiquitous composite pseudoscalar,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 035030,arXiv:2004.09825 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[64]

Exploring new possibilities to discover a light pseudo-scalar at LHCb,

D. Buarque Franzosi, G. Cacciapaglia, X. Cid Vidal, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke, and C. V´ azquez Sierra, “Exploring new possibilities to discover a light pseudo-scalar at LHCb,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 1, (2022) 3,arXiv:2106.12615 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

Composite ALPs in Composite Higgs Models,

G. Ferretti, “Composite ALPs in Composite Higgs Models,”JHEP08(2025) 055, arXiv:2504.01087 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Cacciapagliaet al.,JHEP11(2015), 201 [arXiv:1507.02283 [hep-ph]]

G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, S. J. Lee, and A. Parolini, “Composite scalars at the LHC: the Higgs, the Sextet and the Octet,”JHEP11(2015) 201,arXiv:1507.02283 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[67]

Cacciapagliaet al.,JHEP05(2020), 027 [arXiv:2002.01474 [hep-ph]]

G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, T. Flacke, and A. M. Iyer, “Gluon-Photon Signatures for color octet at the LHC (and beyond),”JHEP05(2020) 027,arXiv:2002.01474 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

Flackeet al.,JHEP02(2026), 028 [arXiv:2506.04318 [hep-ph]]

T. Flacke, J. H. Kim, M. Kunkel, J. S. Pi, and W. Porod, “Hunting and identifying coloured resonances in four top events with machine learning,”JHEP02(2026) 028,arXiv:2506.04318 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[69]

Buarque Franzosiet al.,JHEP11(2016), 076 [arXiv:1605.01363 [hep-ph]]

D. Buarque Franzosi, G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, A. Deandrea, and M. Frandsen, “Vector and Axial-vector resonances in composite models of the Higgs boson,”JHEP11(2016) 076, arXiv:1605.01363 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[70]

Caliriet al.,JHEP04(2025), 160 [arXiv:2412.08720 [hep-ph]]

R. Caliri, J. Hadlik, M. Kunkel, W. Porod, C. Verollet, and C. Verollet, “Electroweak spin-1 resonances in Composite Higgs models,”JHEP04(2025) 160,arXiv:2412.08720 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Cacciapagliaet al.,JHEP06(2024), 092 [arXiv:2404.02198 [hep-ph]]

G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, M. Kunkel, and W. Porod, “Coloured spin-1 states in composite Higgs models,”JHEP06(2024) 092,arXiv:2404.02198 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[72]

A First Top Partner Hunter's Guide

A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi, and A. Wulzer, “A First Top Partner Hunter’s Guide,”JHEP04(2013) 004,arXiv:1211.5663 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[73]

Model Independent Framework for Searches of Top Partners

M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, and L. Panizzi, “Model Independent Framework for Searches of Top Partners,”Nucl. Phys. B876(2013) 376–417,arXiv:1305.4172 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[74]

Bizot, G

N. Bizot, G. Cacciapaglia, and T. Flacke, “Common exotic decays of top partners,”JHEP06 (2018) 065,arXiv:1803.00021 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[75]

Cacciapagliaet al.,Phys

G. Cacciapaglia, T. Flacke, M. Park, and M. Zhang, “Exotic decays of top partners: mind the search gap,”Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 135015,arXiv:1908.07524 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[76]

Exotic decays of top partners with charge 5/3: bounds and opportunities,

K.-P. Xie, G. Cacciapaglia, and T. Flacke, “Exotic decays of top partners with charge 5/3: bounds and opportunities,”JHEP10(2019) 134,arXiv:1907.05894 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[77]

Benbriket al., JHEP05, 028, arXiv:1907.05929 [hep- ph]

R. Benbriket al., “Signatures of vector-like top partners decaying into new neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons,”JHEP05(2020) 028,arXiv:1907.05929 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[78]

Hunting for top partner with a new signature at the LHC,

D. Wang, L. Wu, and M. Zhang, “Hunting for top partner with a new signature at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 11, (2021) 115017,arXiv:2007.09722 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Vector-like quarks decaying into singly and doubly charged bosons at LHC,

G. Corcella, A. Costantini, M. Ghezzi, L. Panizzi, G. M. Pruna, and J. ˇSalko, “Vector-like quarks decaying into singly and doubly charged bosons at LHC,”JHEP10(2021) 108,arXiv:2107.07426 [hep-ph]. – 36 –

work page arXiv 2021
[80]

Banerjee, D

A. Banerjee, D. B. Franzosi, and G. Ferretti, “Modelling vector-like quarks in partial compositeness framework,”JHEP03(2022) 200,arXiv:2202.00037 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.