pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04224 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Black-Hole Scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet: Numerical Relativity Meets Analytics

Shaun Swain , Tamanna Jain , Llibert Arest\'e Sal\'o
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords black hole scatteringEinstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravityeffective one bodynumerical relativitymodified gravityscattering anglestrong field dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The effective-one-body analytic model accurately reproduces the scattering angles from full numerical simulations of black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether an analytic framework called effective-one-body can describe the close encounters of two black holes when gravity includes an extra scalar field and Gauss-Bonnet term. Full nonlinear simulations provide the benchmark, and the analytic predictions match those results closely even when the fields are strong. If the match is reliable, it removes the need to run expensive simulations for every case and instead allows faster calculations of how the black holes deflect each other. This agreement also supplies a concrete route to building waveform models that could detect deviations from ordinary general relativity in future observations of compact-object pairs.

Core claim

We obtain excellent agreement between the scattering angle obtained from the first fully nonlinear black hole scattering simulations in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its effective-one-body analytic description, showing that the analytic framework accurately captures the strong-field scalar-gravitational dynamics.

What carries the argument

The effective-one-body analytic description extended to Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, which resums known post-Newtonian information to predict the scattering angle of hyperbolic black-hole encounters.

If this is right

  • The validated analytic model can be used to construct semi-analytical waveform templates for compact-object binaries in this modified theory.
  • Black-hole scattering angles become a practical probe of strong-field deviations from general relativity.
  • The same comparison method can be applied to other modified-gravity theories to check the reach of their effective-one-body descriptions.
  • Numerical simulations serve as a direct test that the analytic resummation works in regimes where the fields are intense.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the agreement continues to hold at higher post-Newtonian orders, the approach could supply rapid templates for analyzing gravitational-wave signals from modified-gravity scenarios.
  • The method might be extended to spinning or eccentric encounters to cover a wider range of astrophysical events.
  • Successful validation here suggests that effective-one-body models can be adapted for other scalar-tensor theories to accelerate data analysis pipelines.

Load-bearing premise

Extending the effective-one-body model by the single Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant is enough to reproduce the full nonlinear scalar-gravitational dynamics without missing higher-order theory-specific corrections.

What would settle it

A statistically significant difference between the analytic and numerical scattering angles at small impact parameters or large Gauss-Bonnet coupling would show that the effective-one-body description fails to capture the strong-field dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04224 by Llibert Arest\'e Sal\'o, Shaun Swain, Tamanna Jain.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Scattering angle comparison for impact parameter view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Convergence test for the Newman-Penrose Ψ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The study of hyperbolic binary black hole encounters yields an effective probe of the strong field regime of black holes, thus providing an additional channel to test General Relativity. We study the scattering of two black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, a well-motivated effective field theory of gravity, by comparing the scattering angle obtained from the first fully nonlinear black hole scattering simulations with its effective-one-body analytic description. We obtain excellent agreement between analytics and numerics, exhibiting accurate capturing of strong-field scalar-gravitational dynamics. Our work paves the way towards semi-analytical waveform templates of compact object binaries in modified theories of gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs the first fully nonlinear numerical relativity simulations of hyperbolic black-hole scattering in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and compares the extracted scattering angles to an effective-one-body (EOB) analytic model constructed for the same theory. The central claim is that the two approaches exhibit excellent agreement, thereby validating the EOB description of strong-field scalar-gravitational dynamics without additional theory-specific fitting beyond the single Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant.

Significance. If the agreement is shown to be quantitative and free of post-hoc calibration, the result supplies an independent test of the EOB resummation in a modified-gravity setting and opens a route to semi-analytic waveform templates for compact binaries in EsGB. The work is timely given the growing interest in strong-field probes of effective field theories of gravity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (Results): The assertion of 'excellent agreement' is not accompanied by quantitative error measures (relative differences, absolute residuals, or resolution-convergence data) for the scattering angles across the reported range of impact parameters and Gauss-Bonnet couplings. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the agreement is within the numerical truncation error or merely qualitative.
  2. [§3] §3 (EOB construction): The manuscript must explicitly state that no coefficients in the EOB Hamiltonian, effective potential, or scattering-angle resummation were varied to match the NR data. All parameters should be fixed solely by the EsGB action and the single coupling constant; any implicit calibration would convert the comparison into a consistency check rather than an independent validation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1: units and normalization of the reported scattering angles should be stated explicitly (e.g., whether angles are in radians and relative to the GR limit).
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the legend should distinguish the NR data points from the EOB curves by symbol and line style; current overlap makes visual assessment difficult.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We have carefully considered the comments and revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (Results): The assertion of 'excellent agreement' is not accompanied by quantitative error measures (relative differences, absolute residuals, or resolution-convergence data) for the scattering angles across the reported range of impact parameters and Gauss-Bonnet couplings. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the agreement is within the numerical truncation error or merely qualitative.

    Authors: We acknowledge that providing quantitative error measures would enhance the clarity of our claims. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new subsection in §4 detailing the relative differences between the numerical relativity (NR) scattering angles and the effective-one-body (EOB) predictions for all simulated configurations. We also include convergence tests demonstrating that the numerical errors are significantly smaller than the observed discrepancies, confirming that the agreement is quantitative and within truncation error. The abstract has been updated to state 'quantitative agreement within numerical uncertainties' instead of 'excellent agreement'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (EOB construction): The manuscript must explicitly state that no coefficients in the EOB Hamiltonian, effective potential, or scattering-angle resummation were varied to match the NR data. All parameters should be fixed solely by the EsGB action and the single coupling constant; any implicit calibration would convert the comparison into a consistency check rather than an independent validation.

    Authors: We confirm that the EOB model was constructed without any fitting to the NR data; all parameters are determined directly from the Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet action and the value of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant. To address this, we have added an explicit paragraph in §3 stating that 'No post-hoc calibration or fitting of EOB coefficients to the numerical data was performed; the comparison serves as an independent validation of the EOB resummation in this modified gravity theory.' This ensures the validation is independent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for EOB framework; NR-EOB comparison remains independent validation

full rationale

The paper's central result is the agreement between fully nonlinear NR scattering simulations in EsGB and an EOB analytic model. The EOB construction is extended from the modified action using the single Gauss-Bonnet coupling, with resummations and potentials fixed independently of the present NR data. No equation or section reduces the reported scattering angles to a fit performed on the same simulations. Self-citations to prior EOB work exist but are not load-bearing for the strong-field agreement claim, which rests on the numerical data being generated separately. This yields a low circularity score consistent with a genuine cross-check rather than a self-referential derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the effective-one-body framework can be extended to include the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet interaction without introducing uncontrolled errors in the strong-field regime. The Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant is a free parameter of the theory whose value is not specified in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant
    The strength of the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet interaction term is a free parameter in the Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet action; its specific value is not given in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective-one-body methods developed for general relativity can be extended to Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity while preserving accuracy in the strong-field regime.
    Invoked when claiming that the analytic model captures the scalar-gravitational dynamics observed in the simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1279 out tokens · 45927 ms · 2026-05-08T18:16:18.864115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. II. Parameter- ized Tests, (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests, (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. III. Tests of the Remnants, (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    C. P. Burgess,Introduction to Effective Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2020). 6

    2020

  10. [10]

    Kanti, N

    P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley, Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity, Phys. Rev. D54, 5049 (1996), arXiv:hep- th/9511071

    work page arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    Yunes and L

    N. Yunes and L. C. Stein, Non-Spinning Black Holes in Alternative Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83, 104002 (2011), arXiv:1101.2921 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in general- ized scalar-tensor gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 251102 (2014), arXiv:1312.3622 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Black hole hair in gener- alized scalar-tensor gravity: An explicit example, Phys. Rev. D90, 124063 (2014), arXiv:1408.1698 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    T. P. Sotiriou, Black Holes and Scalar Fields, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 214002 (2015), arXiv:1505.00248 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravi- tation, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2220 (1993)

    1993

  16. [16]

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018), arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Ex- tended Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131103 (2018), arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 231101 (2020), arXiv:2006.03095 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Spontaneous scalarization, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015004 (2024), arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-Posed Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 221101 (2020), arXiv:2003.04327 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D101, 124003 (2020), arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified har- monic formulation, Phys. Rev. D103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Dynamics of Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein-Scalar- Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2105.08571 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well- Posedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Singularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Puncture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and four-derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 spacetime dimensions,

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Punc- ture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity and four-derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108, 084018 (2023), arXiv:2306.14966 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Corman, J

    M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 024014 (2023), arXiv:2210.09235 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    D. D. Doneva, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Testing the limits of scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity through nonlinear evolutions of spin- induced scalarization, Phys. Rev. D108, 084017 (2023), arXiv:2307.06474 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    D. D. Doneva, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, and S. S. Yazadjiev, 3+1 nonlinear evolution of Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 024040 (2024), arXiv:2404.15526 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Black hole-neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    M. Corman and W. E. East, Black hole-neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 084065 (2024), arXiv:2405.18496 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Challenges in the nonlinear evolution of unequal mass binaries in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, D. D. Doneva, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Challenges in the nonlinear evolution of unequal mass binaries in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D112, 084022 (2025), arXiv:2507.13046 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    H. L. H. Shum, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Well-posed BSSN-type formula- tion for scalar-tensor theories of gravity with second- order field equations, Phys. Rev. D113, 104001 (2026), arXiv:2512.11034 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Signatures from metastable oppositely-charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    G. Laraet al., Signatures from metastable oppositely- charged black hole binaries in scalar Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity, (2025), arXiv:2505.14785 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, and K. Clough, Black hole binaries in shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity experience a slower merger phase, (2025), arXiv:2511.19073 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Dynamical hair growth in black hole binaries in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    L. Capuano, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazad- jiev, and E. Barausse, Dynamical hair growth in black hole binaries in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, (2026), arXiv:2602.02650 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Gravitational Radiation from Post- Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body aproach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), gr-qc/9811091

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  37. [37]

    T. Jain, P. Rettegno, M. Agathos, A. Nagar, and L. Turco, Effective-one-body Hamiltonian in scalar- tensor gravity at third post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D107, 084017 (2023), arXiv:2211.15580 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Jain, Nonlocal-in-time effective one body Hamiltonian in scalar-tensor gravity at third post-Newtonian order, Phys

    T. Jain, Nonlocal-in-time effective one body Hamiltonian in scalar-tensor gravity at third post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D107, 084018 (2023), arXiv:2301.01070 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Juli´ e, V

    F.-L. Juli´ e, V. Baibhav, E. Berti, and A. Buonanno, Third post-Newtonian effective-one-body Hamiltonian in scalar-tensor and Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 104044 (2023), arXiv:2212.13802 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Jain, Gravitational scattering up to third post- Newtonian approximation for conservative dynamics: Scalar-tensor theories, Phys

    T. Jain, Gravitational scattering up to third post- Newtonian approximation for conservative dynamics: Scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 104071 (2023), arXiv:2304.09052 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Bernard, T

    L. Bernard, T. Jain, and S. Mougiakakos, Scattering an- gle at 3PM in scalar-tensor theories using the PM-EFT formalism, (2026), arXiv:2601.17503 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    G. L. Almeida, Y. Du, Z. Liu, and H. Wang, Conser- vative binary dynamics to third post-Minkowskian order beyond General Relativity, (2026), arXiv:2602.08876 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Rettegno, G

    P. Rettegno, G. Pratten, L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt, and T. Damour, Strong-field scattering of two spin- ning black holes: Numerical relativity versus post- Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 124016 (2023), 7 arXiv:2307.06999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, Post- Minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one- body approach for two-body scattering, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044038 (2024), arXiv:2402.12342 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Swain, G

    S. Swain, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Strong field scat- tering of black holes: Assessing resummation strategies, Phys. Rev. D111, 064048 (2025), arXiv:2411.09652 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Clark and G

    A. Clark and G. Pratten, Strong field scattering of two black holes: Exploring gauge flexibility, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104074 (2025), arXiv:2508.12126 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    O. Long, H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakob- sen, G. Mogull, A. Ramos-Buades, H. R. R¨ uter, L. E. Kidder, and M. A. Scheel, Highly accurate simulations of asymmetric black-hole scattering and cross validation of effective-one-body models, Phys. Rev. D112, 124039 (2025), arXiv:2507.08071 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. Mogull, R. Patil, and L. Pompili, Post- Minkowskian Theory Meets the Spinning Effective-One- Body Approach for Bound-Orbit Waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211402 (2024), arXiv:2405.19181 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Damour, A

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, A. Placidi, and P. Rettegno, Novel Lagrange-multiplier approach to the effective-one-body dynamics of binary systems in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, 024042 (2026), arXiv:2503.05487 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  51. [51]

    Juli´e and E

    F.-L. Juli´ e and E. Berti, Post-Newtonian dynamics and black hole thermodynamics in Einstein-scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D100, 104061 (2019), arXiv:1909.05258 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Juli´ e, H

    F.-L. Juli´ e, H. O. Silva, E. Berti, and N. Yunes, Black hole sensitivities in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D105, 124031 (2022), arXiv:2202.01329 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    E. M. S¨ angeret al., Tests of general relativity with GW230529: A neutron star merging with a lower mass- gap compact object, Phys. Rev. D113, 084070 (2026), arXiv:2406.03568 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Songet al., A potential mass-gap black hole in a wide binary with a circular orbit, Nature Astron.8, 1583 (2024), arXiv:2409.06352 [astro-ph.SR]

    W. Songet al., A potential mass-gap black hole in a wide binary with a circular orbit, Nature Astron.8, 1583 (2024), arXiv:2409.06352 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Hopper, A

    S. Hopper, A. Nagar, and P. Rettegno, Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerics versus analytics, Phys. Rev. D107, 124034 (2023), arXiv:2204.10299 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Damour and P

    T. Damour and P. Rettegno, Strong-field scattering of two black holes: Numerical relativity meets post- Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 064051 (2023), arXiv:2211.01399 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    T. Damour, High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem, Phys. Rev. D97, 044038 (2018), arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Conservative dynamics of binary systems to third post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Conservative Dynam- ics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.- H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering Am- plitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dy- namics at O(G4), Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Con- servative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161104 (2022), arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order, JHEP08, 172, arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    GRFolres: A code for modified gravity simulations in strong gravity,

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, S. E. Brady, K. Clough, D. Doneva, T. Evstafyeva, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, L. Rossi, and S. Yao, GRFolres: A code for modified gravity simula- tions in strong gravity, J. Open Source Softw.9, 6369 (2024), arXiv:2309.06225 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Clough, P

    K. Clough, P. Figueras, H. Finkel, M. Kunesch, E. A. Lim, and S. Tunyasuvunakool, GRChombo : Numeri- cal Relativity with Adaptive Mesh Refinement, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 245011 (2015), arXiv:1503.03436 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    GRChombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics,

    T. Andradeet al., GRChombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics, J. Open Source Softw.6, 3703 (2021), arXiv:2201.03458 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Radia, U

    M. Radia, U. Sperhake, A. Drew, K. Clough, P. Figueras, E. A. Lim, J. L. Ripley, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, T. Fran¸ ca, and T. Helfer, Lessons for adaptive mesh refinement in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 135006 (2022), arXiv:2112.10567 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for mod- ified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D108, 104022 (2023), arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    P. J. Nee, G. Lara, H. P. Pfeiffer, and N. L. Vu, Quasis- tationary hair for binary black hole initial data in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 024061 (2025), arXiv:2406.08410 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Damour, F

    T. Damour, F. Guercilena, I. Hinder, S. Hopper, A. Na- gar, and L. Rezzolla, Strong-Field Scattering of Two Black Holes: Numerics Versus Analytics, Phys. Rev. D 89, 081503 (2014), arXiv:1402.7307 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, A new effective-one- body description of coalescing nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D90, 044018 (2014), arXiv:1406.6913 [gr-qc]. 8 APPENDICES A. Correction to the 3PM effective-one-body potentialw The Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet (EsGB) correction to the conservative sector of the 3PM effective-one-body poten...

    work page arXiv 2014