arxiv: 2605.04670 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational Waves from Higgs Preheating after Inflaton Z₂-Symmetry Breaking

Hua Zhou (Southwest University of Science , Technology) , Qing Yu (Southwest University of Science , Wei Cheng (Chongqing University of Posts , Telecommunications) , Ruo-Peng Zhang (Chongqing Vocational Institute of Engineering)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords gravitational wavespreheatingHiggs fieldinflatonZ2 symmetry breakinglattice simulationsparametric resonanceanisotropic stress

0 comments

The pith

Lattice simulations show that Higgs preheating after inflaton Z2 symmetry breaking produces a gravitational wave background peaking today at 10^9 Hz with amplitude 10^{-10}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper performs nonperturbative lattice simulations to track what happens to the Higgs field once the inflaton's Z2 symmetry is broken during inflation. The breaking introduces both trilinear and quartic inflaton-Higgs couplings that drive parametric resonance, amplifying Higgs inhomogeneities before backreaction ends the process. These inhomogeneities source gravitational waves through the transverse-traceless part of the anisotropic stress tensor. A reader would care because the resulting spectrum redshifts to a high-frequency peak that future resonant-cavity detectors might reach, offering a direct probe of post-inflationary dynamics in a concrete model.

Core claim

The simulations establish that the gravitational wave spectrum grows rapidly during parametric resonance, broadens through rescattering, and saturates in the nonlinear stage. For λ_φ = 10^{-13} and viable couplings (10 < q_φh < 10^4, q_h < 10^3, q_ε < 10^{-5}), the late-time spectrum develops a broad peak with Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6} at production; after redshifting to the present day this becomes a peak frequency f ∼ 10^9 Hz with amplitude Ω_gw,0 h² ∼ 10^{-10}.

What carries the argument

The transverse-traceless projection of the anisotropic stress tensor sourced by amplified Higgs inhomogeneities during parametric resonance and rescattering.

If this is right

Efficient preheating requires both a broad resonance band and delayed backreaction, occurring for the stated ranges of q_φh, q_h, and q_ε when λ_φ = 10^{-13}.
The GW spectrum saturates after the nonlinear stage with a broad peak of Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6} at production.
Redshifting places the peak at f ∼ 10^9 Hz today with present-day energy density parameter Ω_gw,0 h² ∼ 10^{-10}.
The resulting high-frequency signal lies in the range potentially accessible to future resonant-cavity detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Detection of a stochastic background near 10^9 Hz with this amplitude would directly constrain the inflaton-Higgs trilinear and quartic couplings in Z2-breaking inflation models.
The work illustrates how including both trilinear and quartic interactions changes the duration of preheating and the final GW spectrum relative to quartic-only cases.
Non-detection at the predicted frequency and strength would rule out the viable parameter window identified here for this class of models.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen lattice resolution and volume are sufficient to capture the full nonlinear rescattering stage and the transverse-traceless projection without significant numerical artifacts or missing long-wavelength modes.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation at substantially higher resolution or larger volume that yields a markedly different GW spectrum peak height or frequency would indicate that the reported amplitude and shape are influenced by discretization effects.

read the original abstract

In this paper, nonperturbative lattice simulations are used to study Higgs preheating and the associated gravitational wave (GW) background after the inflaton $Z_2$ symmetry is broken during inflation. This symmetry breaking generates both trilinear and quartic inflaton-Higgs interactions during preheating. The quartic inflaton-Higgs coupling is characterized by $q_{\phi h}\equiv \lambda_{\phi h}/\lambda_\phi$, while the trilinear interaction enters jointly through $q_{\phi h}$ and $q_\epsilon\equiv m_\phi/(\sqrt{\lambda_\phi}\phi_0)$. The Higgs self-coupling parameter $q_h\equiv \lambda_h/\lambda_\phi$ determines the onset of backreaction through the effective mass induced by Higgs self-interactions. Our simulations show that efficient preheating requires both a sufficiently broad resonance band and delayed backreaction. For $\lambda_\phi=10^{-13}$, the viable parameter region is approximately $10<q_{\phi h}<10^4$, $q_h<10^3$, and $q_\epsilon<10^{-5}$. Smaller $q_\epsilon$ keeps the system in a quartic-dominated regime and suppresses the rapid drift of resonance bands, while smaller $q_h$ delays the end of preheating by weakening self-interaction-induced backreaction. The amplified Higgs inhomogeneities source GW through the transverse-traceless part of the anisotropic stress tensor. The lattice results show that the GW spectrum grows rapidly during parametric resonance, broadens through rescattering, and saturates in the nonlinear stage. At late times, the spectrum develops a broad peak with amplitude $\Omega_{\rm gw}\sim10^{-6}$ at production. After redshifting to the present day, the peak frequency is $f\sim10^9\,{\rm Hz}$ with present-day amplitude $\Omega_{\rm gw,0} h^2 \sim 10^{-10}$. These results suggest that high-frequency GW from Higgs preheating may be detectable by future resonant-cavity detectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Lattice runs of GW from Higgs preheating after Z2 breaking give a concrete high-frequency target but omit every standard numerical check on the grid.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is a set of lattice simulations that follow Higgs preheating once the inflaton Z2 symmetry breaks and generates both trilinear and quartic inflaton-Higgs couplings. They scan the q parameters, locate a window where resonance stays broad long enough for efficient amplification before backreaction ends it, and then extract the GW spectrum sourced by the resulting Higgs inhomogeneities. The reported late-time broad peak at Omega_gw ~ 10^{-6} at production, redshifting to f ~ 10^9 Hz and Omega_gw,0 h^2 ~ 10^{-10} today, is the concrete output that could interest high-frequency detector groups.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper uses nonperturbative lattice simulations to study Higgs preheating after inflaton Z_2 symmetry breaking during inflation, which induces both trilinear and quartic inflaton-Higgs couplings. For λ_φ = 10^{-13}, it identifies a viable parameter window (roughly 10 < q_φh < 10^4, q_h < 10^3, q_ε < 10^{-5}) for efficient preheating before backreaction ends it, and reports that the resulting Higgs inhomogeneities source a GW spectrum that grows during parametric resonance, broadens via rescattering, and saturates with a broad peak of Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6} at production; after redshifting this yields a present-day peak at f ∼ 10^9 Hz with Ω_gw,0 h² ∼ 10^{-10}, potentially detectable by future resonant-cavity experiments.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work would be significant for extending GW predictions from inflation to the preheating epoch in a model with explicit Z_2 breaking, providing a concrete high-frequency signal that combines parametric resonance with nonlinear rescattering. The nonperturbative lattice treatment of the transverse-traceless anisotropic stress sourced by Higgs fluctuations is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)

[Numerical results and lattice setup] The lattice simulation parameters (volume, grid spacing, time-stepping, and convergence tests) are not reported in the section presenting the numerical results and GW spectra. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported saturation amplitude Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6}, the broadening of the spectrum, and the peak location after redshifting could be affected by UV cutoff artifacts or missing long-wavelength modes once backreaction and rescattering dominate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its potential significance. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The lattice simulation parameters (volume, grid spacing, time-stepping, and convergence tests) are not reported in the section presenting the numerical results and GW spectra. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported saturation amplitude Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6}, the broadening of the spectrum, and the peak location after redshifting could be affected by UV cutoff artifacts or missing long-wavelength modes once backreaction and rescattering dominate.

Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of the lattice parameters is necessary to allow readers to evaluate potential numerical artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (now Section 4.2) that specifies the comoving box size, number of grid points, spatial resolution, time-stepping scheme (second-order leapfrog with adaptive step-size control), and the convergence tests performed. These tests include runs at doubled and halved resolution, as well as larger and smaller volumes, confirming that the saturation value Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6}, the spectral broadening from rescattering, and the location of the peak remain stable once the infrared and ultraviolet cutoffs are varied within the range that still resolves the resonance bands and the backreaction scale. We have also added a brief discussion of why long-wavelength modes below the box size do not alter the reported GW amplitude in the parameter window we consider. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: GW spectrum and amplitudes are direct numerical outputs from lattice evolution with scanned input parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—the rapid growth of the GW spectrum during parametric resonance, broadening via rescattering, saturation in the nonlinear stage, and the specific late-time peak values Ω_gw ∼ 10^{-6} at production (redshifting to f ∼ 10^9 Hz and Ω_gw,0 h² ∼ 10^{-10})—are obtained as computed outputs from nonperturbative lattice simulations of the Higgs and inflaton field dynamics. The parameters q_φh, q_ε, and q_h are explicitly chosen as inputs to identify the viable region for efficient preheating (10 < q_φh < 10^4, q_h < 10^3, q_ε < 10^{-5} for λ_φ = 10^{-13}), and the transverse-traceless anisotropic stress is evolved forward in time to produce the GW spectrum. No step in the provided derivation reduces by construction to a fitted output, self-citation, or renamed ansatz; the results are independent numerical predictions from the chosen initial conditions and couplings. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmological assumptions plus the numerical evolution of the coupled inflaton-Higgs system; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)

λ_φ = 10^{-13}
Overall inflaton self-coupling scale chosen to set the post-inflationary energy density; the viable q windows are quoted relative to this value.
q_φh, q_h, q_ε
Dimensionless ratios scanned over several orders of magnitude to locate the region of efficient preheating.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard FRW background with oscillating inflaton after inflation
Invoked to set up the initial conditions for preheating.
domain assumption Higgs field remains in the broken phase with the given self-coupling
Required for the effective mass and back-reaction terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1515 out tokens · 43553 ms · 2026-05-08T17:39:27.414036+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 91, 99-102 (1980)

1980
[2]

The Inﬂationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

A. H. Guth, “The Inﬂationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 347-356 (1981)

1981
[3]

First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the exp ansion of the Universe,

K. Sato, “First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the exp ansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195, 467-479 (1981)

1981
[4]

Fluctuations in the New Inﬂationary Unive rse,

A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inﬂationary Unive rse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110-1113 (1982)

1982
[5]

The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS d ata set,

D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafe r and E. L. Wright, “The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS d ata set,” Astrophys. J. 473, 576 (1996)

1996
[6]

MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy on angular scales of 10 arcminutes to 5 deg rees,

S. Hanany, P. Ade, A. Balbi, J. Bock, J. Borrill, A. Boscaleri, P. de Bernardis, P. G. Ferreira, V. V. Hristov and A. H. Jaﬀe, et al. “MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy on angular scales of 10 arcminutes to 5 deg rees,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 545, L5 (2000)

2000
[7]

Estimates of cosmological parameters using the CMB angular power spectrum of ACBAR,

J. H. Goldstein, P. A. R. Ade, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, C. Cantalup o, C. R. Contaldi, M. D. Daub, W. L. Holzapfel, C. Kuo and A. E. Lange, et al. “Estimates of cosmological parameters using the CMB angular power spectrum of ACBAR,” Astr ophys. J. 599, 773-785 (2003)

2003
[8]

High sensitivity measurements of the CMB power spectrum with the extended Very Small Array,

C. Dickinson, R. A. Battye, P. Carreira, K. Cleary, R. D. Davies, R. J. Davis, R. Genova-Santos, K. Grainge, C. M. Gutierrez and Y. A. Hafez, et al. “High sensitivity measurements of the CMB power spectrum with the extended Very Small Array,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 353, 732 (2004)

2004
[9]

Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies,

D. J. Eisenstein et al. [SDSS], “Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies,” Astrophys. J. 633, 560-574 (2005)

2005
[10]

Implications of the cosmic background imager polarization data,

J. L. Sievers, C. Achermann, J. R. Bond, L. Bronfman, R. Bus tos, C. R. Contaldi, C. Dickinson, P. G. Ferreira, M. E. Jones and A. M. Lewis, et al. “Implications of the cosmic background imager polarization data,” Astrophys. J. 660, 976-987 (2007). – 17 –

2007
[11]

High resolution CMB power spectrum from the complete ACBAR data set,

C. L. Reichardt, P. A. R. Ade, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. A. Bre vik, C. R. Contaldi, M. D. Daub, J. T. Dempsey, J. H. Goldstein and W. L. Holzapfel, et al. “High resolution CMB power spectrum from the complete ACBAR data set,” Astrophy s. J. 694, 1200-1219 (2009)

2009
[12]

Cosmological Parameters from the QUaD CMB polarization experiment,

P. G. Castro et al. [QUaD], “Cosmological Parameters from the QUaD CMB polarization experiment,” Astrophys. J. 701, 857-864 (2009)

2009
[13]

Cosmological Constraints from the Clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 Luminous Red Galaxies,

B. A. Reid, W. J. Percival, D. J. Eisenstein, L. Verde, D. N. Sper gel, R. A. Skibba, N. A. Bahcall, T. Budavari, M. Fukugita and J. R. Gott, et al. “Cosmological Constraints from the Clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 Luminous Red Galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 404, 60-85 (2010)

2010
[14]

Measurement of CMB Polarization Power Spectra from Two Years of BICEP Data,

H. C. Chiang, P. A. R. Ade, D. Barkats, J. O. Battle, E. M. Bierm an, J. J. Bock, C. D. Dowell, L. Duband, E. F. Hivon and W. L. Holzapfel, et al. “Measurement of CMB Polarization Power Spectra from Two Years of BICEP Data,” Astrop hys. J. 711, 1123-1140 (2010)

2010
[15]

Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation,

E. Komatsu et al. [WMAP], “Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation,” Astrophys. J. Sup pl. 192, 18 (2011)

2011
[16]

Natural inﬂation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons,

K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto, “Natural inﬂation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3233-3236 (1990)

1990
[17]

Chaotic Inﬂation,

A. D. Linde, “Chaotic Inﬂation,” Phys. Lett. B 129, 177-181 (1983)

1983
[18]

Reheating cons traints on modiﬁed single-ﬁeld natural inﬂation models,

H. Zhou, Q. Yu, Y. Pan, R. Zhou and W. Cheng, “Reheating cons traints on modiﬁed single-ﬁeld natural inﬂation models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.7, 588 (2022)

2022
[19]

Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitation al Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

P. A. R. Ade et al. [BICEP and Keck], “Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitation al Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021)

2018
[20]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inﬂation,

Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inﬂation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020)

2018
[21]

Chaotic Inﬂationary Scenario in M odels Having Nonminimal Coupling With Curvature,

T. Futamase and K. i. Maeda, “Chaotic Inﬂationary Scenario in M odels Having Nonminimal Coupling With Curvature,” Phys. Rev. D 39, 399-404 (1989)

1989
[22]

Induced gravity inﬂat ion in the standard model of particle physics,

J. L. Cervantes-Cota and H. Dehnen, “Induced gravity inﬂat ion in the standard model of particle physics,” Nucl. Phys. B 442, 391-412 (1995)

1995
[23]

The Standard Model Hig gs boson as the inﬂaton,

F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Hig gs boson as the inﬂaton,” Phys. Lett. B 659, 703-706 (2008)

2008
[24]

Particle Productio n During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,

J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Particle Productio n During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,” Phys. Rev. D 42, 2491-2504 (1990)

1990
[25]

Unive rse reheating after inﬂation,

Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Unive rse reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 5438-5455 (1995)

1995
[26]

Reheating afte r inﬂation,

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating afte r inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195-3198 (1994)

1994
[27]

Inﬂaton decay an d heavy particle production with negative coupling,

B. R. Greene, T. Prokopec and T. G. Roos, “Inﬂaton decay an d heavy particle production with negative coupling,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 6484-6507 (1997)

1997
[28]

Relic gravitational waves p roduced after preheating,

S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, “Relic gravitational waves p roduced after preheating,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 653-660 (1997). – 18 –

1997
[29]

General relativ istic preheating after inﬂation,

B. A. Bassett, D. I. Kaiser and R. Maartens, “General relativ istic preheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Lett. B 455, 84-89 (1999)

1999
[30]

Gravity, parametric resonance an d chaotic inﬂation,

R. Easther and M. Parry, “Gravity, parametric resonance an d chaotic inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 103503 (2000)

2000
[31]

Metric perturbations at reheating : The Use of spherical symmetry,

F. Finelli and S. Khlebnikov, “Metric perturbations at reheating : The Use of spherical symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 043505 (2002)

2002
[32]

Equatio n of state and beginning of thermalization after preheating,

D. I. Podolsky, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and M. Peloso, “Equatio n of state and beginning of thermalization after preheating,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 023501 (2006)

2006
[33]

Stochastic gravitational wave prod uction after inﬂation,

R. Easther and E. A. Lim, “Stochastic gravitational wave prod uction after inﬂation,” JCAP 04, 010 (2006)

2006
[34]

Baryon Asymmetry in Inﬂationary Universe,

A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, “Baryon Asymmetry in Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 116, 329 (1982)

1982
[35]

Particle Production in th e New Inﬂationary Cosmology,

L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M. B. Wise, “Particle Production in th e New Inﬂationary Cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B 117, 29 (1982)

1982
[36]

Gravitational wave production from the decay of the standard model Higgs ﬁeld after inﬂation,

D. G. Figueroa, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido and F. Torrent ´ ı, “Gravitational wave production from the decay of the standard model Higgs ﬁeld after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 103521 (2016)

2016
[37]

Gravitational wave s from non-Abelian gauge ﬁelds at a tachyonic transition,

A. Tranberg, S. T¨ ahtinen and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational wave s from non-Abelian gauge ﬁelds at a tachyonic transition,” JCAP 04, 012 (2018)

2018
[38]

Gravitational wave s from kinetic preheating,

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, Jr. and A. Tishue, “Gravitational wave s from kinetic preheating,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 043536 (2024)

2024
[39]

Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inﬂation,

J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and J. P. Uz an, “Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inﬂation,” Phys. Re v. D 76, 123517 (2007)

2007
[40]

Detector conﬁguration of DECIGO/BBO and identiﬁcation of cosmological neutron-star binaries,

K. Yagi and N. Seto, “Detector conﬁguration of DECIGO/BBO and identiﬁcation of cosmological neutron-star binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 044011 (2011) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 95, 109901 (2017)]

2011
[41]

The status of DECIGO,

S. Sato, S. Kawamura, M. Ando, T. Nakamura, K. Tsubono, A. Araya, I. Funaki, K. Ioka, N. Kanda and S. Moriwaki, et al. “The status of DECIGO,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 840, no.1, 012010 (2017)

2017
[42]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,

D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Barsotti, G. B illingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne and R. Eisenstein, et al. “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc . 51, 035 (2019)

2019
[43]

Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ -Hz frequencies,

A. Sesana, N. Korsakova, M. A. Sedda, V. Baibhav, E. Baraus se, S. Barke, E. Berti, M. Bonetti, P. R. Capelo and C. Caprini, et al. “Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ -Hz frequencies,” Exper. Astron. 51, 1333-1383 (2021)

2021
[44]

Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,

M. Maggiore et al. [ET], “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 03, 050 (2020)

2020
[45]

Bridging the µ Hz Gap in the Gravitational-Wave Landscape with Binary Resonances,

D. Blas and A. C. Jenkins, “Bridging the µ Hz Gap in the Gravitational-Wave Landscape with Binary Resonances,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, no.10, 101103 (2022)

2022
[46]

A stochastic background of gravitational waves from hybrid preheating,

J. Garcia-Bellido and D. G. Figueroa, “A stochastic background of gravitational waves from hybrid preheating,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 061302 (2007)

2007
[47]

Gravitational Wave P roduction At The End Of Inﬂation,

R. Easther, J. T. Giblin, Jr. and E. A. Lim, “Gravitational Wave P roduction At The End Of Inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 221301 (2007). – 19 –

2007
[48]

LATTICEEASY: A Program for lat tice simulations of scalar ﬁelds in an expanding universe,

G. N. Felder and I. Tkachev, “LATTICEEASY: A Program for lat tice simulations of scalar ﬁelds in an expanding universe,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 929-932 (2008)

2008
[49]

A Gravitationa l Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inﬂation,

J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa and A. Sastre, “A Gravitationa l Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 043517 (2008)

2008
[50]

Gravitational wave productio n from preheating: parameter dependence,

D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, “Gravitational wave productio n from preheating: parameter dependence,” JCAP 10, 057 (2017)

2017
[51]

Spillway Preheating,

J. Fan, K. D. Lozanov and Q. Lu, “Spillway Preheating,” JHEP 05, 069 (2021)

2021
[52]

Phenomenology of spillway prehe ating: Equation of state and gravitational waves,

G. Mansﬁeld, J. Fan and Q. Lu, “Phenomenology of spillway prehe ating: Equation of state and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.2, 023542 (2024)

2024
[53]

The Universe after inﬂatio n: The Wide resonance case,

S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, “The Universe after inﬂatio n: The Wide resonance case,” Phys. Lett. B 390, 80-86 (1997)

1997
[54]

S tructure of resonance in preheating after inﬂation,

P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “S tructure of resonance in preheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 6175-6192 (1997)

1997
[55]

Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,

S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716, 30-61 (2012)

2012
[56]

Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standa rd Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,

G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standa rd Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716, 1-29 (2012)

2012
[57]

Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum,

J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto a nd A. Strumia, “Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum,” Phys. L ett. B 709, 222-228 (2012)

2012
[58]

The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I,

D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg, “The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I,” JCAP 04, 035 (2021)

2021
[59]

Cos moLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge ﬁeld dynamics in an expandin g universe,

D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg, “Cos moLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge ﬁeld dynamics in an expandin g universe,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 283, 108586 (2023)

2023
[60]

Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,

G. N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. L inde and I. Tkachev, “Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 011601 (2001)

2001
[61]

Tachyonic instability an d dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking,

G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, “Tachyonic instability an d dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 123517 (2001)

2001
[62]

Sy mmetry breaking and false vacuum decay after hybrid inﬂation,

J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Garcia Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, “Sy mmetry breaking and false vacuum decay after hybrid inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 103501 (2003)

2003
[63]

Challenges for inﬂaton dark matte r,

O. Lebedev and J. H. Yoon, “Challenges for inﬂaton dark matte r,” Phys. Lett. B 821, 136614 (2021)

2021
[64]

Classical decay of inﬂaton ,

S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, “Classical decay of inﬂaton ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 219-222 (1996)

1996
[65]

Lattice study of classical inﬂato n decay,

T. Prokopec and T. G. Roos, “Lattice study of classical inﬂato n decay,” Phys. Rev. D 55, 3768-3775 (1997)

1997
[66]

Non-thermal product ion of Dark Matter after Inﬂation,

N. Bernal, A. Chatterjee and A. Paul, “Non-thermal product ion of Dark Matter after Inﬂation,” JCAP 12, 020 (2018). – 20 –

2018
[67]

Towards the th eory of reheating after inﬂation,

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the th eory of reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258-3295 (1997)

1997
[68]

Gravity Wa ves from Tachyonic Preheating after Hybrid Inﬂation,

J. F. Dufaux, G. Felder, L. Kofman and O. Navros, “Gravity Wa ves from Tachyonic Preheating after Hybrid Inﬂation,” JCAP 03, 001 (2009)

2009
[69]

Detecting p lanetary-mass primordial black holes with resonant electromagnetic gravitational-wave detector s,

N. Herman, A. F¨ uzfa, L. Lehoucq and S. Clesse, “Detecting p lanetary-mass primordial black holes with resonant electromagnetic gravitational-wave detector s,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 023524 (2021)

2021
[70]

Electromagnetic ante nnas for the resonant detection of the stochastic gravitational wave background,

N. Herman, L. Lehoucq and A. F´ uzfa, “Electromagnetic ante nnas for the resonant detection of the stochastic gravitational wave background,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 124009 (2023)

2023
[71]

Euclid Definition Study Report

R. Laureijs et al. [EUCLID], “Euclid Deﬁnition Study Report,” [arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[72]

COrE (Cosmic Origins Explorer) A White Paper,

F. R. Bouchet et al. [COrE], “COrE (Cosmic Origins Explorer) A White Paper,” [arXiv:1102.2181 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[73]

Constrain ts on scalar and tensor spectra from Nef f,

I. Ben-Dayan, B. Keating, D. Leon and I. Wolfson, “Constrain ts on scalar and tensor spectra from Nef f,” JCAP 06, 007 (2019). – 21 –

2019