arxiv: 2605.04693 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: unknown

Superconductivity in moir\'e transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers: comparison of two distinct theoretical approaches

Waseem Akbar , Micha{\l} Zegrodnik

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords superconductivitymoiré bilayerstwisted WSe2Hubbard modelt-J-U modelgap symmetrystrong correlationstransition metal dichalcogenides

0 comments

The pith

Two models for superconductivity in twisted WSe2 predict different gap symmetries and correlation strengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares superconductivity in moiré transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, focusing on twisted WSe2, through two theoretical approaches. One uses the negative-U Hubbard model to describe a conventional pairing scenario that produces an isotropic s-wave gap with no direct effect from strong repulsion. The other uses the t-J-U model to incorporate substantial Coulomb repulsion effects that renormalize the electronic bands and allow unconventional gap symmetries. Contrasting the resulting superconducting states shows how the choice of framework changes predicted properties such as gap structure and the role of correlations, which can then be checked against existing experimental data on these systems.

Core claim

Superconductivity in twisted WSe2 is examined by contrasting a negative-U Hubbard model, in which strong electron-electron repulsion does not directly affect the paired state and an isotropic s-wave gap emerges, with a t-J-U model that incorporates strong correlation effects through substantial renormalization induced by Coulomb repulsion and permits unconventional gap symmetries; the key properties obtained in each framework are compared to evaluate consistency with available experimental observations in moiré TMD bilayers.

What carries the argument

The negative-U Hubbard model for conventional isotropic s-wave pairing versus the t-J-U model for correlated unconventional pairing, each used to compute the superconducting state in twisted WSe2.

If this is right

The negative-U Hubbard model produces a conventional isotropic s-wave gap while the t-J-U model can produce unconventional symmetries.
Substantial band renormalization from Coulomb repulsion appears only in the t-J-U framework and alters the effective bandwidth and pairing scale.
Experimental probes of gap anisotropy or the response to doping and interaction strength can distinguish the two descriptions.
The comparison indicates that strong correlations may be necessary to explain certain features seen in moiré TMD superconductivity experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If experiments favor the t-J-U results, calculations that add spin-fluctuation or phonon channels on top of the t-J-U framework would be a logical next step.
The same two-model comparison could be applied to other moiré TMDs such as twisted MoS2 to test whether the pattern of conventional versus correlated pairing is material-dependent.
Quantitative mapping of the predicted critical temperatures and gap magnitudes from each model onto existing transport data would tighten the constraints on which framework is more realistic.
The distinction between the models suggests that future microscopic derivations starting from the continuum moiré Hamiltonian should explicitly track whether strong-repulsion renormalization is retained or projected out.

Load-bearing premise

The negative-U Hubbard and t-J-U models, with their respective interaction terms, sufficiently capture the essential physics of electron pairing in twisted WSe2 without requiring additional interaction channels or material-specific corrections.

What would settle it

A measurement showing either a clearly nodal or highly anisotropic gap, or a strong dependence of the critical temperature on the strength of Coulomb repulsion, would favor one model over the other.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04693 by Micha{\l} Zegrodnik, Waseem Akbar.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (a) The values of the direction dependent factor view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Superconducting gap amplitude as a function of displacement field ( view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The gap amplitudes for the obtained mixed singlet-triplet paired state as view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Superconductivity has recently been observed in moir\'e transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers. Here, we investigate the superconducting state in twisted WSe$_2$ using two complementary theoretical approaches. The first is based on the negative $U$-Hubbard model and represents a relatively conventional pairing scenario, in which strong electron-electron repulsion does not directly affect the paired state and an isotropic $s$-$wave$ gap emerges. The second approach employs the $t$-$J$-$U$ model, allowing for unconventional gap symmetries and incorporating strong correlation effects via substantial renormalization induced by Coulomb repulsion. We compare the key properties of the superconducting states obtained within these two frameworks and discuss their implications in light of available experimental observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper runs a side-by-side comparison of the negative-U Hubbard and t-J-U models on twisted WSe2 superconductivity and flags how their gap symmetries and correlation handling differ.

read the letter

The core point is that the negative-U Hubbard approach produces conventional isotropic s-wave pairing while the t-J-U model brings in unconventional symmetries plus strong renormalization from Coulomb repulsion, and the authors map those differences onto existing experiments in moiré TMDs. That contrast is the main thing a reader takes away. The work applies both frameworks to the same material and keeps the discussion tied to measurable quantities like gap structure, which is a reasonable exercise. It does not invent new interactions or solve the models from scratch, but it does organize the predictions clearly enough that experimental groups can see where the two pictures diverge. The models themselves are standard, so the advance is in the direct application and the experimental implications rather than in new formalism. The abstract states the comparison without showing equations or sample outputs, which leaves the quantitative weight of the differences unclear until the full text is checked. If the paper only reproduces known qualitative distinctions without fresh numbers or tighter experimental links, the added value stays limited. Readers already working on moiré superconductors will find this useful as a quick reference for model choice. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the literature honestly, so it merits a serious referee. I would send it for review but ask the authors to add explicit results or plots that make the claimed distinctions concrete.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares superconductivity in twisted WSe2 moiré bilayers using two distinct theoretical frameworks. The negative-U Hubbard model is employed to describe a conventional scenario yielding an isotropic s-wave gap in which strong electron-electron repulsion does not directly influence the paired state. The t-J-U model is used to incorporate strong correlation effects through renormalization, permitting unconventional gap symmetries. The authors compare key properties of the resulting superconducting states from each approach and discuss implications relative to existing experimental observations in moiré TMD systems.

Significance. If the reported comparison is accurate, the work provides a useful side-by-side examination of conventional versus strongly correlated pairing scenarios in recently discovered moiré superconductivity. This can assist in identifying which predicted features (such as gap symmetry or renormalization effects) are model-dependent and which may be more robust for experimental tests. The paper is credited for treating the two frameworks as complementary without asserting that either constitutes a complete microscopic description.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that 'key properties' are compared but does not name even one concrete example (e.g., gap symmetry, critical temperature, or quasiparticle density of states). Adding such specificity would improve clarity without altering the central claim.
Notation for the interaction terms (negative U, t-J-U) should be defined explicitly at first use in the main text, even if standard in the field, to aid readers from adjacent subfields.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment. We appreciate the recognition that our comparison of the negative-U Hubbard and t-J-U models provides a useful side-by-side examination of conventional versus strongly correlated pairing in twisted WSe2, and we are pleased with the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in model comparison

full rationale

The paper conducts a side-by-side comparison of superconducting states obtained from two distinct frameworks—the negative-U Hubbard model (yielding isotropic s-wave pairing) and the t-J-U model (allowing unconventional symmetries with correlation effects)—without deriving one set of results from the other or fitting parameters of one to outputs of the other. The abstract and structure treat the models as independent theoretical approaches whose key properties are computed separately and then contrasted against experimental observations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the central claim remains a straightforward comparative exercise that is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Assessment limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are described beyond the standard interaction terms (U, J) already present in the cited Hubbard and t-J-U literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1090 out tokens · 62957 ms · 2026-05-08T16:47:05.936725+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

[1]

Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Nature, 579:353 – 358, 2020

Yanhao Tang, Lizhong Li, Tingxin Li, Yang Xu, Song Liu, Katayun Bar- mak, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Allan H Macdonald, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Nature, 579:353 – 358, 2020. main printed on May 7, 202611

2020
[2]

Evidence of topo- logical Kondo insulating state in MoTe 2/WSe2 moir´ e bilayers, 2025

Zhongdong Han, Yiyu Xia, Zhengchao Xia, Wenjin Zhao, Yichi Zhang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Evidence of topo- logical Kondo insulating state in MoTe 2/WSe2 moir´ e bilayers, 2025

2025
[3]

Gate-tunable heavy fermions in a moir´ e kondo lattice.Nature, 616:61–65, 2023

Wenjin Zhao, Bowen Shen, Zui Tao, Zhongdong Han, Kaifei Kang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Mak, Fai, and Jie Shan. Gate-tunable heavy fermions in a moir´ e kondo lattice.Nature, 616:61–65, 2023

2023
[4]

Foutty, Carlos R

Benjamin A. Foutty, Carlos R. Kometter, Trithep Devakul, Aidan P. Reddy, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, and Benjamin E. Feld- man. Mapping twist-tuned multiband topology in bilayer WSe 2.Science, 384(6693):343–347, 2024

2024
[5]

Observation of in- teger and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2

Fan Xu, Zheng Sun, Tongtong Jia, Chang Liu, Cheng Xu, Chushan Li, Yu Gu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Bingbing Tong, Jinfeng Jia, Zhiwen Shi, Shengwei Jiang, Yang Zhang, Xiaoxue Liu, and Tingxin Li. Observation of in- teger and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Phys. Rev. X, 13:031037, Sep 2023

2023
[6]

Robinson, Allan H

Fan Zhang, Nicol´ as Morales-Dur´ an, Yanxing Li, Wang Yao, Jung-Jung Su, Yu-Chuan Lin, Chengye Dong, Xiaohui Liu, Fu-Xiang Rikudo Chen, Hyunsue Kim, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Xiaoqin Li, Joshua A. Robinson, Allan H. Macdonald, and Chih-Kang Shih. Experimental signature of layer skyrmions and implications for band topology in twisted WSe 2 bilayers, 2025

2025
[7]

Quantum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands

Tingxin Li, Shengwei Jiang, Bowen Shen, Yang Zhang, Lizhong Li, Zui Tao, Trithep Devakul, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Quantum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands. Nature, 600(7890):641–646, December 2021

2021
[8]

Realization of the Haldane Chern insulator in a moir´ e lattice, 2022

Wenjin Zhao, Kaifei Kang, Lizhong Li, Charles Tschirhart, Evgeny Redekop, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Andrea Young, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Realization of the Haldane Chern insulator in a moir´ e lattice, 2022

2022
[9]

Interplay between topology and electron-electron interactions in the moir´ e MoTe2/WSe2 heter- obilayer.Phys

Palash Saha, Louk Rademaker, and Micha l Zegrodnik. Interplay between topology and electron-electron interactions in the moir´ e MoTe2/WSe2 heter- obilayer.Phys. Rev. B, 112:045147, Jul 2025

2025
[10]

Emergent quantum valley hall insulator from electron interactions in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers, 2025

Palash Saha and Micha l Zegrodnik. Emergent quantum valley hall insulator from electron interactions in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers, 2025

2025
[11]

Reddy, Trithep Devakul, Renee Sailus, Rounak Banerjee, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Sefaattin Tongay, Alex Zettl, Liang Fu, Michael F

Hongyuan Li, Ziyu Xiang, Aidan P. Reddy, Trithep Devakul, Renee Sailus, Rounak Banerjee, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Sefaattin Tongay, Alex Zettl, Liang Fu, Michael F. Crommie, and Feng Wang. Wigner Molecular Crystals from Multi-electron Moir´ e Artificial Atoms, 2023

2023
[12]

Regan, Danqing Wang, Chenhao Jin, M

Emma C. Regan, Danqing Wang, Chenhao Jin, M. Iqbal Bakti Utama, Beini Gao, Xin Wei, Sihan Zhao, Wenyu Zhao, Zuocheng Zhang, Kentaro Yumigeta, Mark Blei, Johan D. Carlstr¨ om, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Se- faattin Tongay, Michael Crommie, Alex Zettl, and Feng Wang. Mott and generalized wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices.Natur...

2020
[13]

Electrically tunable localized versus delo- 12main printed on May 7, 2026 calized intralayer moir´ e excitons and trions in a twisted mos2 bilayer.ACS Nano, 16(6):8983–8992, 2022

Medha Dandu, Garima Gupta, Pushkar Dasika, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Kausik Majumdar. Electrically tunable localized versus delo- 12main printed on May 7, 2026 calized intralayer moir´ e excitons and trions in a twisted mos2 bilayer.ACS Nano, 16(6):8983–8992, 2022. PMID: 35679485

2026
[14]

Localization-enhanced moir´ e exciton in twisted transition metal dichalco- genide heterotrilayer superlattices.Light: Science & Applications, 12(1):117, May 2023

Haihong Zheng, Biao Wu, Shaofei Li, Junnan Ding, Jun He, Zongwen Liu, Chang-Tian Wang, Jian-Tao Wang, Anlian Pan, and Yanping Liu. Localization-enhanced moir´ e exciton in twisted transition metal dichalco- genide heterotrilayer superlattices.Light: Science & Applications, 12(1):117, May 2023

2023
[15]

Bichromatic moir´ e superlattices for tunable quadrupolar trions and correlated states, 2025

Mingfeng Chen, Runtong Li, Haonan Wang, Yuliang Yang, Yiyang Lai, Chaowei Hu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Jiaqiang Yan, Jiun-Haw Chu, Erik Henriksen, Chuanwei Zhang, Li Yang, and Xi Wang. Bichromatic moir´ e superlattices for tunable quadrupolar trions and correlated states, 2025

2025
[16]

Rhodes, Chengand Tan, Martin Claassen, Dante M

Lei Wang, En-Min Shih, Augusto Ghiotto, Lede Xian, Daniel A. Rhodes, Chengand Tan, Martin Claassen, Dante M. Kennes, Yusong Bai, Bumho Kim, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Xiaoyang Zhu, James Hone, Angel Rubio, and Cory R. Pasupathy, Abhay N. amd Dean. Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature Materials, 19...

2020
[17]

Superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2.Nature, 637(8047):833–838, Jan 2025

Yiyu Xia, Zhongdong Han, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak. Superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2.Nature, 637(8047):833–838, Jan 2025

2025
[18]

Mandrus, Katayun Barmak, James Hone, Andrew J

Yinjie Guo, Jordan Pack, Joshua Swann, Luke Holtzman, Matthew Cothrine, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, David G. Mandrus, Katayun Barmak, James Hone, Andrew J. Millis, Abhay Pasupathy, and Cory R. Dean. Su- perconductivity in 5.0°twisted bilayer wse2.Nature, 637(8047):839–845, Jan 2025

2025
[19]

Simulating high- temperature superconductivity in moir´ e wse2, 2025

Yiyu Xia, Zhongdong Han, Jiacheng Zhu, Yichi Zhang, Patrick Kn¨ uppel, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan. Simulating high- temperature superconductivity in moir´ e wse2, 2025

2025
[20]

Kennes, Andrew J

Yinjie Guo, John Cenker, Ammon Fischer, Daniel Mu˜ noz-Segovia, Jordan Pack, Luke Holtzman, Lennart Klebl, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Katayun Barmak, James Hone, Angel Rubio, Dante M. Kennes, Andrew J. Millis, Abhay Pasupathy, and Cory R. Dean. Angle evolution of the super- conducting phase diagram in twisted bilayer wse2, 2025

2025
[21]

Signatures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insulators, 2025

Fan Xu, Zheng Sun, Jiayi Li, Ce Zheng, Cheng Xu, Jingjing Gao, Tongtong Jia, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Bingbing Tong, Li Lu, Jinfeng Jia, Zhiwen Shi, Shengwei Jiang, Yuanbo Zhang, Yang Zhang, Shiming Lei, Xi- aoxue Liu, and Tingxin Li. Signatures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insulators, 2025

2025
[22]

J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller. Possible highT c superconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B: Condensed Matter, 64:189–193, 1986

1986
[23]

Spa lek, M

J. Spa lek, M. Fidrysiak, M. Zegrodnik, and A. Biborski. Superconductivity in high-tc and related strongly correlated systems from variational perspective: Beyond mean field theory.Physics Reports, 959:1–117, 2022. main printed on May 7, 202613

2022
[24]

Zegrodnik and A

M. Zegrodnik and A. Biborski. Mixed singlet-triplet superconducting state within the moir´ et−j−umodel applied to twisted bilayer wse2.Phys. Rev. B, 108:064506, Aug 2023

2023
[25]

Topological superconductivity with mixed singlet-triplet pairing in moir´ e tran- sition metal dichalcogenide bilayers.Phys

Waseem Akbar, Andrzej Biborski, Louk Rademaker, and Micha l Zegrodnik. Topological superconductivity with mixed singlet-triplet pairing in moir´ e tran- sition metal dichalcogenide bilayers.Phys. Rev. B, 110:064516, Aug 2024

2024
[26]

Daniele Guerci, Daniel Kaplan, Julian Ingham, J. H. Pixley, and Andrew J. Millis. Topological superconductivity from repulsive interactions in twisted wse2, 2024

2024
[27]

Theory of topological superconductivity and antiferromagnetic correlated insulators in twisted bilayer wse2, 2024

Chuyi Tuo, Ming-Rui Li, Zhengzhi Wu, Wen Sun, and Hong Yao. Theory of topological superconductivity and antiferromagnetic correlated insulators in twisted bilayer wse2, 2024

2024
[28]

Scherer, and Dante M

Lennart Klebl, Ammon Fischer, Laura Classen, Michael M. Scherer, and Dante M. Kennes. Competition of density waves and superconductivity in twisted tungsten diselenide.Phys. Rev. Res., 5:L012034, Mar 2023

2023
[29]

Wehling, Antoine Georges, Dante M

Ammon Fischer, Lennart Klebl, Valentin Cr´ epel, Siheon Ryee, Angel Ru- bio, Lede Xian, Tim O. Wehling, Antoine Georges, Dante M. Kennes, and Andrew J. Millis. Theory of intervalley-coherent afm order and topological superconductivity in twse2.Phys. Rev. X, 15:041055, Dec 2025

2025
[30]

Topological chiral superconduc- tivity mediated by intervalley antiferromagnetic fluctuations in twisted bilayer wse2.Phys

Wei Qin, Wen-Xuan Qiu, and Fengcheng Wu. Topological chiral superconduc- tivity mediated by intervalley antiferromagnetic fluctuations in twisted bilayer wse2.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:246002, Dec 2025

2025
[31]

Valentin Cr´ epel, Daniele Guerci, Jennifer Cano, J. H. Pixley, and Andrew Mil- lis. Topological superconductivity in doped magnetic moir´ e semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:056001, Aug 2023

2023
[32]

Singlet, triplet and pair density wave supercon- ductivity in the doped triangular-lattice moir´ e system, 2023

Feng Chen and Donna Sheng. Singlet, triplet and pair density wave supercon- ductivity in the doped triangular-lattice moir´ e system, 2023

2023
[33]

Optimal superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse 2 where the van hove singu- larity crosses half-filling, 2025

Micha l Zegrodnik, Waseem Akbar, Andrzej Biborski, and Louk Rademaker. Optimal superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse 2 where the van hove singu- larity crosses half-filling, 2025

2025
[34]

Theory of correlated insulators and superconductor atν= 1 in twisted wse2, 2025

Sunghoon Kim, Juan Felipe Mendez-Valderrama, Xuepeng Wang, and Deban- jan Chowdhury. Theory of correlated insulators and superconductor atν= 1 in twisted wse2, 2025

2025
[35]

Superconductivity in the twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenide wse2: A quantum cluster study.Phys

Mathieu B´ elanger, J´ erˆ ome Fournier, and David S´ en´ echal. Superconductivity in the twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenide wse2: A quantum cluster study.Phys. Rev. B, 106:235135, Dec 2022

2022
[36]

Superconduc- tivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers.Phys

Jihang Zhu, Yang-Zhi Chou, Ming Xie, and Sankar Das Sarma. Superconduc- tivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers.Phys. Rev. B, 111:L060501, Feb 2025

2025
[37]

Robaszkiewicz, R

S. Robaszkiewicz, R. Micnas, and K. A. Chao. Hartree theory for the negative- uextended hubbard model: Ground state.Phys. Rev. B, 24:4018–4024, Oct 1981

1981
[38]

Micnas, J

R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz. Superconductivity in narrow- band systems with local nonretarded attractive interactions.Rev. Mod. Phys., 62:113–171, Jan 1990. 14main printed on May 7, 2026

1990
[40]

Universal properties of high-temperature superconductors from real-space pairing:t−j−umodel and its quantitative comparison with experiment.Phys

J´ ozef Spa lek, Micha l Zegrodnik, and Jan Kaczmarczyk. Universal properties of high-temperature superconductors from real-space pairing:t−j−umodel and its quantitative comparison with experiment.Phys. Rev. B, 95:024506, Jan 2017

2017
[41]

J. Hubbard. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 276(1365):238–257, 11 1963

1963
[42]

N. Bulut. d x 2 - y 2 superconductivity and the hubbard model.Advances in Physics, 51(7):1587–1667, 2002

2002
[43]

Kinetic exchange interaction in a narrow s-band.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 10(10):L271, may 1977

K A Chao, J Spalek, and A M Oles. Kinetic exchange interaction in a narrow s-band.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 10(10):L271, may 1977

1977
[44]

The t-j model for the oxide high-tc superconductors.Reports on Progress in Physics, 71(3):036501, March 2008

Masao Ogata and Hiroshi Fukuyama. The t-j model for the oxide high-tc superconductors.Reports on Progress in Physics, 71(3):036501, March 2008

2008
[45]

Band topology, hubbard model, heisenberg model, and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in twisted bi- layer wse2.Phys

Haining Pan, Fengcheng Wu, and Sankar Das Sarma. Band topology, hubbard model, heisenberg model, and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in twisted bi- layer wse2.Phys. Rev. Res., 2:033087, Jul 2020

2020
[46]

Variational study of fermi surface deformations in hubbard models.Europhysics Letters, 98(2):27006, apr 2012

J¨ org B¨ unemann, Tobias Schickling, and Florian Gebhard. Variational study of fermi surface deformations in hubbard models.Europhysics Letters, 98(2):27006, apr 2012

2012
[47]

Kaczmarczyk

J. Kaczmarczyk. Comparison of two approaches for the treatment of gutzwiller variational wave functions.Philosophical Magazine, 95(5-6):563–573, 2015

2015